Skip to contentSkip to conversation

drm/amdkfd: Remove vla

PATCH In review Laura Abbott 3 participants 4 messages Apr 9, 2018 – Apr 10, 2018

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 drm/amdkfd: Remove vla

There's an ongoing effort to remove VLAs[1] from the kernel to eventually turn on -Wvla. The single VLA usage in the amdkfd driver is actually constant across all current platforms. Switch to a constant size array instead.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_interrupt.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_interrupt.c +5 -3
index 035c351f47c5..c9863858f343 100644
@@ -139,10 +139,12 @@ static void interrupt_wq(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct kfd_dev *dev = container_of(work, struct kfd_dev,
 						interrupt_work);
+	uint32_t ih_ring_entry[4];
 
-	uint32_t ih_ring_entry[DIV_ROUND_UP(
-				dev->device_info->ih_ring_entry_size,
-				sizeof(uint32_t))];
+	if (dev->device_info->ih_ring_entry_size > (4 * sizeof(uint32_t))) {
+		dev_err(kfd_chardev(), "Ring entry too small\n");
+		return;
+	}
 
 	while (dequeue_ih_ring_entry(dev, ih_ring_entry))
 		dev->device_info->event_interrupt_class->interrupt_wq(dev,
Signature · 6 lines
2.14.3

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
maintainer
#1 lore raw

Am 09.04.2018 um 23:06 schrieb Laura Abbott:

Quoted 3 lines

There's an ongoing effort to remove VLAs[1] from the kernel to eventually turn on -Wvla. The single VLA usage in the amdkfd driver is actually constant across all current platforms.

Actually that isn't correct.

Could be that we haven't upstreamed KFD support for them, but Vega10 have a different interrupt ring entry size and so would cause the error message here.

Quoted 2 lines

Switch to a constant size array
instead.

I would say to just make make the array bigger.

Regards,
Christian.

Quoted 28 lines

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621

---
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_interrupt.c | 8 +++++---
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_interrupt.c +5 -3
index 035c351f47c5..c9863858f343 100644
@@ -139,10 +139,12 @@ static void interrupt_wq(struct work_struct *work)
  {
  	struct kfd_dev *dev = container_of(work, struct kfd_dev,
  						interrupt_work);
+	uint32_t ih_ring_entry[4];
 
-	uint32_t ih_ring_entry[DIV_ROUND_UP(
-				dev->device_info->ih_ring_entry_size,
-				sizeof(uint32_t))];
+	if (dev->device_info->ih_ring_entry_size > (4 * sizeof(uint32_t))) {
+		dev_err(kfd_chardev(), "Ring entry too small\n");
+		return;
+	}
 
  	while (dequeue_ih_ring_entry(dev, ih_ring_entry))
  		dev->device_info->event_interrupt_class->interrupt_wq(dev,
maintainer
#2 lore raw

Thanks Christian for catching that. I'm working on a patch series to upstream Vega10 support, about 95% done. It will add this ASIC info for Vega10:

static const struct kfd_device_info vega10_device_info = {
.asic_family = CHIP_VEGA10,
.max_pasid_bits = 16,
.max_no_of_hqd = 24,
.doorbell_size = 8,
.ih_ring_entry_size = 8 * sizeof(uint32_t), /* !!! IH ring entry size is bigger on Vega10 !!! */ .event_interrupt_class = &event_interrupt_class_v9,
.num_of_watch_points = 4,
.mqd_size_aligned = MQD_SIZE_ALIGNED,
.supports_cwsr = true,
.needs_iommu_device = false,
.needs_pci_atomics = false,
};

If you change it to uint32_t ih_ring_entry[8] and update the check, it should be reasonably future proof.

Regards,
  Felix

Quoted 45 lines · Christian König

Am 09.04.2018 um 23:06 schrieb Laura Abbott:

Quoted 4 lines

There's an ongoing effort to remove VLAs[1] from the kernel to eventually
turn on -Wvla. The single VLA usage in the amdkfd driver is actually constant across all current platforms.

Actually that isn't correct.

Could be that we haven't upstreamed KFD support for them, but Vega10 have a different interrupt ring entry size and so would cause the error message here.

Quoted 2 lines

Switch to a constant size array
instead.

I would say to just make make the array bigger.

Regards,
Christian.

Quoted 25 lines

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621

---
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_interrupt.c | 8 +++++---

  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_interrupt.c +1 -0
index 035c351f47c5..c9863858f343 100644
@@ -139,10 +139,12 @@ static void interrupt_wq(struct work_struct *work)
   {
       struct kfd_dev *dev = container_of(work, struct kfd_dev,
                           interrupt_work);
+    uint32_t ih_ring_entry[4];

  -    uint32_t ih_ring_entry[DIV_ROUND_UP(
-                dev->device_info->ih_ring_entry_size, -                sizeof(uint32_t))];
+    if (dev->device_info->ih_ring_entry_size > (4 * sizeof(uint32_t))) {
+        dev_err(kfd_chardev(), "Ring entry too small\n"); +        return;

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines

+    }
        while (dequeue_ih_ring_entry(dev, ih_ring_entry)) dev->device_info->event_interrupt_class->interrupt_wq(dev,

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

#3 lore raw
In reply to Christian König
Quoted 9 lines · Christian König

Am 09.04.2018 um 23:06 schrieb Laura Abbott:

Quoted 3 lines

There's an ongoing effort to remove VLAs[1] from the kernel to eventually turn on -Wvla. The single VLA usage in the amdkfd driver is actually constant across all current platforms.

Actually that isn't correct.

Could be that we haven't upstreamed KFD support for them, but Vega10 have a different interrupt ring entry size and so would cause the error message here.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Switch to a constant size array
instead.

I would say to just make make the array bigger.

Regards,
Christian.

What array size would accommodate future chips?

Quoted 18 lines
Quoted 18 lines

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621

---
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_interrupt.c | 8 +++++---

  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_interrupt.c +1 -1
index 035c351f47c5..c9863858f343 100644
@@ -139,10 +139,12 @@ static void interrupt_wq(struct work_struct *work)
   {
       struct kfd_dev *dev = container_of(work, struct kfd_dev,
                           interrupt_work);
+    uint32_t ih_ring_entry[4];
-    uint32_t ih_ring_entry[DIV_ROUND_UP(
Quoted 9 lines

drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_interrupt.c static void interrupt_wq(struct work_struct *work) · line 150

Quoted 8 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_interrupt.c +4 -2
-                dev->device_info->ih_ring_entry_size,
-                sizeof(uint32_t))];
+    if (dev->device_info->ih_ring_entry_size > (4 * sizeof(uint32_t))) {
+        dev_err(kfd_chardev(), "Ring entry too small\n");
+        return;
+    }
       while (dequeue_ih_ring_entry(dev, ih_ring_entry))
           dev->device_info->event_interrupt_class->interrupt_wq(dev,

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx