Skip to contentSkip to conversation

btrfs: Only check first key for committed tree blocks

PATCH In review Qu Wenruo 2 participants 2 messages Apr 12, 2018 – Apr 13, 2018 Btrfs file system

lore
Share & tools
lore

Qu Wenruo

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 btrfs: Only check first key for committed tree blocks

When looping btrfs/074 with many cpus (>= 8), it's possible to trigger kernel warning due to first key verification:

[ 4239.523446] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 2381 at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:460 btree_read_extent_buffer_pages+0x1ad/0x210
[ 4239.523830] Modules linked in:
[ 4239.524630] RIP: 0010:btree_read_extent_buffer_pages+0x1ad/0x210
[ 4239.527101] Call Trace:
[ 4239.527251]  read_tree_block+0x42/0x70
[ 4239.527434]  read_node_slot+0xd2/0x110
[ 4239.527632]  push_leaf_right+0xad/0x1b0
[ 4239.527809]  split_leaf+0x4ea/0x700
[ 4239.527988]  ? leaf_space_used+0xbc/0xe0
[ 4239.528192]  ? btrfs_set_lock_blocking_rw+0x99/0xb0
[ 4239.528416]  btrfs_search_slot+0x8cc/0xa40
[ 4239.528605]  btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x71/0xc0
[ 4239.528798]  __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xa98/0x1680
[ 4239.529013]  btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x10b/0x1b0
[ 4239.529205]  btrfs_commit_transaction+0x33/0xaf0
[ 4239.529445]  ? start_transaction+0xa8/0x4f0
[ 4239.529630]  btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1b0/0x4e0
[ 4239.529833]  btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x54/0xa0
[ 4239.530045]  btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x25/0x70
[ 4239.531907]  btrfs_direct_IO+0x233/0x3d0
[ 4239.532098]  generic_file_direct_write+0xcb/0x170
[ 4239.532296]  btrfs_file_write_iter+0x2bb/0x5f4
[ 4239.532491]  aio_write+0xe2/0x180
[ 4239.532669]  ? lock_acquire+0xac/0x1e0
[ 4239.532839]  ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
[ 4239.533032]  do_io_submit+0x594/0x860
[ 4239.533223]  ? do_io_submit+0x594/0x860
[ 4239.533398]  SyS_io_submit+0x10/0x20
[ 4239.533560]  ? SyS_io_submit+0x10/0x20
[ 4239.533729]  do_syscall_64+0x75/0x1d0
[ 4239.533979]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7
[ 4239.534182] RIP: 0033:0x7f8519741697

The problem here is, at btree_read_extent_buffer_pages() we don't have acquired read/write lock on that extent buffer, only basic info like level/bytenr is reliable.

So race condition leads to such false alert.

However in current call site, it's impossible to acquire proper lock without race window.
To fix the problem, we only verify first key for committed tree blocks (whose generation is no larger than fs_info->last_trans_committed), so the content of such tree blocks will not change and there is no need to get read/write lock.

Reported-by Nikolay Borisov <[email protected]>
Fixes 581c1760415c ("btrfs: Validate child tree block's level and first key")
Signed-off-by Qu Wenruo <[email protected]>
---
 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +8 -0
index 07b5e6f7df67..23803102aa0d 100644
@@ -449,6 +449,14 @@ static int verify_level_key(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 	if (!first_key)
 		return 0;
 
+	/*
+	 * For live tree block (new tree blocks in current transaction),
+	 * we need proper lock context to avoid race, which is impossible here.
+	 * So we only checks tree blocks which is read from disk, whose
+	 * generation <= fs_info->last_trans_committed.
+	 */
+	if (btrfs_header_generation(eb) > fs_info->last_trans_committed)
+		return 0;
 	if (found_level)
 		btrfs_node_key_to_cpu(eb, &found_key, 0);
 	else
Signature · 1 line
2.17.0
#1 lore raw
Quoted 49 lines · Qu Wenruo

When looping btrfs/074 with many cpus (>= 8), it's possible to trigger kernel warning due to first key verification:

[ 4239.523446] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 2381 at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:460 btree_read_extent_buffer_pages+0x1ad/0x210
[ 4239.523830] Modules linked in:
[ 4239.524630] RIP: 0010:btree_read_extent_buffer_pages+0x1ad/0x210
[ 4239.527101] Call Trace:
[ 4239.527251]  read_tree_block+0x42/0x70
[ 4239.527434]  read_node_slot+0xd2/0x110
[ 4239.527632]  push_leaf_right+0xad/0x1b0
[ 4239.527809]  split_leaf+0x4ea/0x700
[ 4239.527988]  ? leaf_space_used+0xbc/0xe0
[ 4239.528192]  ? btrfs_set_lock_blocking_rw+0x99/0xb0
[ 4239.528416]  btrfs_search_slot+0x8cc/0xa40
[ 4239.528605]  btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x71/0xc0
[ 4239.528798]  __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xa98/0x1680
[ 4239.529013]  btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x10b/0x1b0
[ 4239.529205]  btrfs_commit_transaction+0x33/0xaf0
[ 4239.529445]  ? start_transaction+0xa8/0x4f0
[ 4239.529630]  btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1b0/0x4e0
[ 4239.529833]  btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x54/0xa0
[ 4239.530045]  btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x25/0x70
[ 4239.531907]  btrfs_direct_IO+0x233/0x3d0
[ 4239.532098]  generic_file_direct_write+0xcb/0x170
[ 4239.532296]  btrfs_file_write_iter+0x2bb/0x5f4
[ 4239.532491]  aio_write+0xe2/0x180
[ 4239.532669]  ? lock_acquire+0xac/0x1e0
[ 4239.532839]  ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
[ 4239.533032]  do_io_submit+0x594/0x860
[ 4239.533223]  ? do_io_submit+0x594/0x860
[ 4239.533398]  SyS_io_submit+0x10/0x20
[ 4239.533560]  ? SyS_io_submit+0x10/0x20
[ 4239.533729]  do_syscall_64+0x75/0x1d0
[ 4239.533979]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7
[ 4239.534182] RIP: 0033:0x7f8519741697

The problem here is, at btree_read_extent_buffer_pages() we don't have acquired read/write lock on that extent buffer, only basic info like level/bytenr is reliable.

So race condition leads to such false alert.

However in current call site, it's impossible to acquire proper lock without race window.
To fix the problem, we only verify first key for committed tree blocks (whose generation is no larger than fs_info->last_trans_committed), so the content of such tree blocks will not change and there is no need to get read/write lock.

Quoted 3 lines
Reported-by Nikolay Borisov <[email protected]>
Fixes 581c1760415c ("btrfs: Validate child tree block's level and first key")
Signed-off-by Qu Wenruo <[email protected]>

Thanks, qeueued for 4.17.