Skip to contentSkip to conversation

add support for the asus C201 chromebook (4GiB)

PATCH Superseded Marty E. Plummer 7 participants 36 messages May 6, 2018 – Jul 25, 2018 3 messages not in the archive

Subsystems (4)

v1 of 3 Superseded Latest is v3 →

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

cover add support for the asus C201 chromebook (4GiB)

Build and boot tested on my chromebook, which was generously altered by Simon Glass to have a servo header and also generously provided a servo board itself to do debugging with.

It ''works'', but has a few oddities. I can't seem to get it to see my external sdcard or a usb flash drive, so I've been having to ymodem my kernel, fdt, and initramfs over to test booting (which does work). The screen is a bit inconsistent on whether or not it activates any given power cycle, but when it does work, it works right.

The changes to sdram_common.c were taken from coreboot, as it has otherwise identical code (minus the if (!size_mb) block), and actually works on my hardware.

Marty E. Plummer (3):
sf: Add GigaDevice gd25q32b entry
rockchip: add support for veyron-speedy (ASUS Chromebook C201)
rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

 arch/arm/dts/Makefile                     |   1 +
 arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts     | 189 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c |   3 +-
 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288/Kconfig     |  11 ++
 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c     |  62 ++++---
 board/google/veyron/Kconfig               |  16 ++
 configs/chromebook_speedy_defconfig       |  96 +++++++++++
 drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash_ids.c           |   1 +
 8 files changed, 353 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts
 create mode 100644 configs/chromebook_speedy_defconfig
Signature · 6 lines
2.17.0

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20180506142513.19911-1-hanetzer-zVALfsKDk1AS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org

#2 lore raw

PATCH 1/3 sf: Add GigaDevice gd25q32b entry

Add entry for GigaDevice gd25q32b part.

---
 drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash_ids.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash_ids.c +1 -0
index ef55abb01d..de940645ed 100644
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ const struct spi_flash_info spi_flash_ids[] = {
 	{"en25s64",	   INFO(0x1c3817, 0x0, 64 * 1024,   128, 0) },
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_GIGADEVICE	/* GIGADEVICE */
+	{"gd25q32b",	   INFO(0xc84016, 0x0, 64 * 1024,    64, SECT_4K) },
 	{"gd25q64b",	   INFO(0xc84017, 0x0, 64 * 1024,   128, SECT_4K) },
 	{"gd25lq32",	   INFO(0xc86016, 0x0, 64 * 1024,    64, SECT_4K) },
 #endif
Signature · 1 line
2.17.0
#4 lore raw

PATCH 2/3 rockchip: add support for veyron-speedy (ASUS Chromebook C201)

In reply to a message not in the archive

This adds support for the ASUS C201, a RK3288-based clamshell device. The device tree comes from linus's linux tree at 87ef12027b9b1dd0e0b12cf311fbcb19f9d92539. The SDRAM parameters are for 4GB Samsung LPDDR3, decoded from coreboot's src/mainboard/google/veyron/sdram_inf/sdram-lpddr3-samsung-4GB.inc

---
 arch/arm/dts/Makefile                     |   1 +
 arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts     | 189 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c |   3 +-
 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288/Kconfig     |  11 ++
 board/google/veyron/Kconfig               |  16 ++
 configs/chromebook_speedy_defconfig       |  96 +++++++++++
 6 files changed, 315 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts
 create mode 100644 configs/chromebook_speedy_defconfig
arch/arm/dts/Makefile +1 -0
index ac7667b1e8..ee04d9bedd 100644
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += \
 	rk3288-veyron-jerry.dtb \
 	rk3288-veyron-mickey.dtb \
 	rk3288-veyron-minnie.dtb \
+	rk3288-veyron-speedy.dtb \
 	rk3288-vyasa.dtb \
 	rk3328-evb.dtb \
 	rk3368-lion.dtb \
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +189 -0

189 lines not on this page · raw message

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c +2 -1
index f3ea624277..9ae4802647 100644
@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ u32 spl_boot_device(void)
 fallback:
 #elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_JERRY) || \
 		defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBIT_MICKEY) || \
-		defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_MINNIE)
+		defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_MINNIE) || \
+		defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_SPEEDY)
 	return BOOT_DEVICE_SPI;
 #endif
 	return BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1;
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288/Kconfig +11 -0
index 6beb26fd7a..8d1d37895d 100644
@@ -30,6 +30,17 @@ config TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_MINNIE
 	  functions. It includes 2 or 4GB of SDRAM and 16 or 32GB of
 	  internal MMC. The product name is ASUS Chromebook Flip.
 
+config TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_SPEEDY
+	bool "Google/Rockchip Veyron-Speedy Chromebook"
+	select BOARD_LATE_INIT
+	help
+	  Speedy is a RK3288-based clamshell device with 2 USB 2.0 ports,
+	  micro HDMI, an 11.6 inch display, micro-SD card,
+	  HD camera, touchpad, wifi and Bluetooth. It includes a Chrome OS
+	  EC (Cortex-M3) to provide access to the keyboard and battery
+	  functions. It includes 2 or 4GB of SDRAM and 16GB of internal MMC.
+	  The product name is Asus Chromebook C201PA.
+
 config TARGET_EVB_RK3288
 	bool "Evb-RK3288"
 	select BOARD_LATE_INIT
board/google/veyron/Kconfig +16 -0
index 770e9aad28..7f55d78dac 100644
@@ -45,3 +45,19 @@ config BOARD_SPECIFIC_OPTIONS # dummy
 	def_bool y
 
 endif
+
+if TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_SPEEDY
+
+config SYS_BOARD
+	default "veyron"
+
+config SYS_VENDOR
+	default "google"
+
+config SYS_CONFIG_NAME
+	default "veyron"
+
+config BOARD_SPECIFIC_OPTIONS # dummy
+	def_bool y
+
+endif
configs/chromebook_speedy_defconfig new file +96 -0

96 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 1 line
2.17.0
#5 lore raw

PATCH 2/3 rockchip: add support for veyron-speedy (ASUS Chromebook C201)

arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts

Quoted 38 lines · Marty E. Plummer

This adds support for the ASUS C201, a RK3288-based clamshell device. The device tree comes from linus's linux tree at 87ef12027b9b1dd0e0b12cf311fbcb19f9d92539. The SDRAM parameters are for 4GB Samsung LPDDR3, decoded from coreboot's src/mainboard/google/veyron/sdram_inf/sdram-lpddr3-samsung-4GB.inc

---

arch/arm/dts/Makefile                     |   1 +
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts     | 189 ++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c |   3 +-
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288/Kconfig     |  11 ++
board/google/veyron/Kconfig               |  16 ++
configs/chromebook_speedy_defconfig       |  96 +++++++++++
6 files changed, 315 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts create mode 100644 configs/chromebook_speedy_defconfig

arch/arm/dts/Makefile +1 -0
index ac7667b1e8..ee04d9bedd 100644
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += \
 	rk3288-veyron-jerry.dtb \
 	rk3288-veyron-mickey.dtb \
 	rk3288-veyron-minnie.dtb \
+	rk3288-veyron-speedy.dtb \
 	rk3288-vyasa.dtb \
 	rk3328-evb.dtb \
 	rk3368-lion.dtb \
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +0 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..d5383cef0d

This file looks quite different then the one I see on kernel.org with that revision id. So you are sure you imported that one?

arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts line 6

Quoted 7 lines
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +6 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,189 @@
+/*
+ * Google Veyron Speedy Rev 1+ board device tree source
+ *
+ * Copyright 2015 Google, Inc
+ *
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier:	GPL-2.0

This file is dual licensed upstream, keep it that way.
The comment will claim it’s a X11 license but the license text below is actually MIT so you may want to use the MIT SPDX tag for that.

Quoted 53 lines
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +53 -0
+ */
+
+/dts-v1/;
+#include "rk3288-veyron-chromebook.dtsi"
+#include "cros-ec-sbs.dtsi"
+
+/ {
+	model = "Google Speedy";
+	compatible = "google,veyron-speedy-rev9", "google,veyron-speedy-rev8",
+		     "google,veyron-speedy-rev7", "google,veyron-speedy-rev6",
+		     "google,veyron-speedy-rev5", "google,veyron-speedy-rev4",
+		     "google,veyron-speedy-rev3", "google,veyron-speedy-rev2",
+		     "google,veyron-speedy", "google,veyron", "rockchip,rk3288";
+
+	chosen {
+		stdout-path = &uart2;
+	};
+
+	panel_regulator: panel-regulator {
+		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+		enable-active-high;
+		gpio = <&gpio7 RK_PB6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		pinctrl-0 = <&lcd_enable_h>;
+		regulator-name = "panel_regulator";
+		startup-delay-us = <100000>;
+		vin-supply = <&vcc33_sys>;
+	};
+
+	vcc18_lcd: vcc18-lcd {
+		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+		enable-active-high;
+		gpio = <&gpio2 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		pinctrl-0 = <&avdd_1v8_disp_en>;
+		regulator-name = "vcc18_lcd";
+		regulator-always-on;
+		regulator-boot-on;
+		vin-supply = <&vcc18_wl>;
+	};
+
+	backlight_regulator: backlight-regulator {
+		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+		enable-active-high;
+		gpio = <&gpio2 RK_PB4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		pinctrl-0 = <&bl_pwr_en>;
+		regulator-name = "backlight_regulator";
+		vin-supply = <&vcc33_sys>;
+		startup-delay-us = <15000>;
+	};
+};
+

arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts line 69

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +10 -0
+&dmc {
+	rockchip,pctl-timing = <0x215 0xc8 0x0 0x35 0x26 0x2 0x70 0x2000d
+		0x6 0x0 0x8 0x4 0x17 0x24 0xd 0x6
+		0x4 0x8 0x4 0x76 0x4 0x0 0x30 0x0
+		0x1 0x2 0x2 0x4 0x0 0x0 0xc0 0x4
+		0x8 0x1f4>;
+	rockchip,phy-timing = <0x48d7dd93 0x187008d8 0x121076
+		0x0 0xc3 0x6 0x1>;
+	rockchip,sdram-params = <0x20D266A4 0x5B6 6 533000000 6 13 0>;
+};

Not sure if this should go into a separate dtsi. One of the maintainer will have a preferred way I think, so lets see what they will add.

Quoted 288 lines
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +119 -0
+&gpio_keys {
+	power {
+		gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+	};
+};
+
+&backlight {
+	power-supply = <&backlight_regulator>;
+};
+
+&panel {
+	power-supply = <&panel_regulator>;
+};
+
+&rk808 {
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&pmic_int_l>;
+};
+
+&sdmmc {
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc_clk &sdmmc_cmd &sdmmc_cd_disabled &sdmmc_cd_gpio
+			&sdmmc_bus4>;
+	disable-wp;
+};
+
+&vcc_5v {
+	enable-active-high;
+	gpio = <&gpio7 RK_PC5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&drv_5v>;
+};
+
+&vcc50_hdmi {
+	enable-active-high;
+	gpio = <&gpio5 RK_PC3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&vcc50_hdmi_en>;
+};
+
+&edp {
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&edp_hpd>;
+};
+
+&pinctrl {
+	backlight {
+		bl_pwr_en: bl_pwr_en {
+			rockchip,pins = <2 12 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	buck-5v {
+		drv_5v: drv-5v {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 21 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	edp {
+		edp_hpd: edp_hpd {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 11 RK_FUNC_2 &pcfg_pull_down>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	emmc {
+		/* Make sure eMMC is not in reset */
+		emmc_deassert_reset: emmc-deassert-reset {
+			rockchip,pins = <2 9 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	hdmi {
+		vcc50_hdmi_en: vcc50-hdmi-en {
+			rockchip,pins = <5 19 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	lcd {
+		lcd_enable_h: lcd-en {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 14 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+
+		avdd_1v8_disp_en: avdd-1v8-disp-en {
+			rockchip,pins = <2 13 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	pmic {
+		dvs_1: dvs-1 {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 12 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_down>;
+		};
+
+		dvs_2: dvs-2 {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 15 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_down>;
+		};
+	};
+};
+
+&i2c4 {
+	status = "okay";
+
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&i2c4_xfer>;
+
+	trackpad at 15 {
+		compatible = "elan,i2c_touchpad";
+		interrupt-parent = <&gpio7>;
+		interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+		/*
+		 * Remove the inherited pinctrl settings to avoid clashing
+		 * with bus-wide ones.
+		 */
+		/delete-property/pinctrl-names;
+		/delete-property/pinctrl-0;
+		reg = <0x15>;
+		vcc-supply = <&vcc33_io>;
+		wakeup-source;
+	};
+};
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c +0 -0
index f3ea624277..9ae4802647 100644
@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ u32 spl_boot_device(void)

fallback:

#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_JERRY) || \
		defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBIT_MICKEY) || \
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c +2 -1
-		defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_MINNIE)
+		defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_MINNIE) || \
+		defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_SPEEDY)
	return BOOT_DEVICE_SPI;
#endif
	return BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1;
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288/Kconfig +11 -0
index 6beb26fd7a..8d1d37895d 100644
@@ -30,6 +30,17 @@ config TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_MINNIE
 	  functions. It includes 2 or 4GB of SDRAM and 16 or 32GB of
 	  internal MMC. The product name is ASUS Chromebook Flip.
 
+config TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_SPEEDY
+	bool "Google/Rockchip Veyron-Speedy Chromebook"
+	select BOARD_LATE_INIT
+	help
+	  Speedy is a RK3288-based clamshell device with 2 USB 2.0 ports,
+	  micro HDMI, an 11.6 inch display, micro-SD card,
+	  HD camera, touchpad, wifi and Bluetooth. It includes a Chrome OS
+	  EC (Cortex-M3) to provide access to the keyboard and battery
+	  functions. It includes 2 or 4GB of SDRAM and 16GB of internal MMC.
+	  The product name is Asus Chromebook C201PA.
+

config TARGET_EVB_RK3288

	bool "Evb-RK3288"
	select BOARD_LATE_INIT
board/google/veyron/Kconfig +0 -0
index 770e9aad28..7f55d78dac 100644
@@ -45,3 +45,19 @@ config BOARD_SPECIFIC_OPTIONS # dummy
 	def_bool y
 

endif

board/google/veyron/Kconfig +16 -0
+
+if TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_SPEEDY
+
+config SYS_BOARD
+	default "veyron"
+
+config SYS_VENDOR
+	default "google"
+
+config SYS_CONFIG_NAME
+	default "veyron"
+
+config BOARD_SPECIFIC_OPTIONS # dummy
+	def_bool y
+
+endif
configs/chromebook_speedy_defconfig new file +96 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..8789b56f37
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+CONFIG_ARM=y
+CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=0x00100000
+CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN=0x2000
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_RK3288=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT is not set
+CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_SPEEDY=y
+CONFIG_SPL_SPI_FLASH_SUPPORT=y
+CONFIG_SPL_SPI_SUPPORT=y
+CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R_ADDR=0x80000
+CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="rk3288-veyron-speedy"
+CONFIG_DEBUG_UART=y
+# CONFIG_ANDROID_BOOT_IMAGE is not set
+CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE=y
+# CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO is not set
+CONFIG_DISPLAY_BOARDINFO_LATE=y
+CONFIG_BOARD_EARLY_INIT_F=y
+CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R=y
+CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R_MALLOC_SIMPLE_LEN=0x2000
+CONFIG_SPL_SPI_LOAD=y
+CONFIG_FASTBOOT_FLASH=y
+CONFIG_FASTBOOT_FLASH_MMC_DEV=0
+CONFIG_CMD_GPIO=y
+CONFIG_CMD_GPT=y
+CONFIG_CMD_I2C=y
+CONFIG_CMD_MMC=y
+CONFIG_CMD_SF=y
+CONFIG_CMD_SF_TEST=y
+CONFIG_CMD_SPI=y
+CONFIG_CMD_USB=y
+# CONFIG_CMD_SETEXPR is not set
+CONFIG_CMD_CACHE=y
+CONFIG_CMD_TIME=y
+CONFIG_CMD_PMIC=y
+CONFIG_CMD_REGULATOR=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_DOS_PARTITION is not set
+# CONFIG_SPL_EFI_PARTITION is not set
+CONFIG_SPL_PARTITION_UUIDS=y
+CONFIG_SPL_OF_CONTROL=y
+CONFIG_OF_SPL_REMOVE_PROPS="pinctrl-0 pinctrl-names clock-names interrupt-parent assigned-clocks assigned-clock-rates assigned-clock-parents"
+CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA=y
+CONFIG_REGMAP=y
+CONFIG_SPL_REGMAP=y
+CONFIG_SYSCON=y
+CONFIG_SPL_SYSCON=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_SIMPLE_BUS is not set
+CONFIG_CLK=y
+CONFIG_SPL_CLK=y
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_GPIO=y
+CONFIG_I2C_CROS_EC_TUNNEL=y
+CONFIG_SYS_I2C_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_I2C_MUX=y
+CONFIG_DM_KEYBOARD=y
+CONFIG_CROS_EC_KEYB=y
+CONFIG_CROS_EC=y
+CONFIG_CROS_EC_SPI=y
+CONFIG_PWRSEQ=y
+CONFIG_MMC_DW=y
+CONFIG_MMC_DW_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_PINCTRL=y
+CONFIG_SPL_PINCTRL=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_PINCTRL_FULL is not set
+CONFIG_PINCTRL_ROCKCHIP_RK3288=y
+CONFIG_DM_PMIC=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_PMIC_CHILDREN is not set
+CONFIG_PMIC_RK8XX=y
+CONFIG_DM_REGULATOR_FIXED=y
+CONFIG_REGULATOR_RK8XX=y
+CONFIG_PWM_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_RAM=y
+CONFIG_SPL_RAM=y
+CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_BASE=0xff690000
+CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_CLOCK=24000000
+CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_SHIFT=2
+CONFIG_SYS_NS16550=y
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_SERIAL=y
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_SPI=y
+CONFIG_SYSRESET=y
+CONFIG_USB=y
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_USB2_PHY=y
+CONFIG_USB_STORAGE=y
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET=y
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET_MANUFACTURER="Rockchip"
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET_VENDOR_NUM=0x2207
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET_PRODUCT_NUM=0x320a
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET_DWC2_OTG=y
+CONFIG_USB_FUNCTION_MASS_STORAGE=y
+CONFIG_DM_VIDEO=y
+CONFIG_DISPLAY=y
+CONFIG_VIDEO_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_DISPLAY_ROCKCHIP_EDP=y
+CONFIG_DISPLAY_ROCKCHIP_HDMI=y
+CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF=y
+CONFIG_CMD_DHRYSTONE=y
+CONFIG_ERRNO_STR=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_OF_LIBFDT is not set
Signature · 6 lines
2.17.0

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot at lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
#6 lore raw

PATCH 2/3 rockchip: add support for veyron-speedy (ASUS Chromebook C201)

Quoted 33 lines · klaus.goger at theobroma-systems.com
Quoted 33 lines · Marty E. Plummer

This adds support for the ASUS C201, a RK3288-based clamshell device. The device tree comes from linus's linux tree at 87ef12027b9b1dd0e0b12cf311fbcb19f9d92539. The SDRAM parameters are for 4GB Samsung LPDDR3, decoded from coreboot's src/mainboard/google/veyron/sdram_inf/sdram-lpddr3-samsung-4GB.inc

---

arch/arm/dts/Makefile                     |   1 +
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts     | 189 ++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c |   3 +-
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288/Kconfig     |  11 ++
board/google/veyron/Kconfig               |  16 ++
configs/chromebook_speedy_defconfig       |  96 +++++++++++
6 files changed, 315 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts create mode 100644 configs/chromebook_speedy_defconfig

arch/arm/dts/Makefile +1 -0
index ac7667b1e8..ee04d9bedd 100644
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += \
 	rk3288-veyron-jerry.dtb \
 	rk3288-veyron-mickey.dtb \
 	rk3288-veyron-minnie.dtb \
+	rk3288-veyron-speedy.dtb \
 	rk3288-vyasa.dtb \
 	rk3328-evb.dtb \
 	rk3368-lion.dtb \
Quoted 8 lines

arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts

Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +0 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..d5383cef0d

This file looks quite different then the one I see on kernel.org with that revision id. So you are sure you imported that one?

Dafuq... it seems I borked something up in doing the patch juggling to turn my single-commit mess of a patch (you know, the 'get the thing to work branch') into a good patch series I messed up on this one.

Quoted 13 lines

arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts line 6

Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +6 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,189 @@
+/*
+ * Google Veyron Speedy Rev 1+ board device tree source
+ *
+ * Copyright 2015 Google, Inc
+ *
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier:	GPL-2.0

This file is dual licensed upstream, keep it that way. The comment will claim it's a X11 license but the license text below is actually MIT so you may want to use the MIT SPDX tag for that.

Yeah, I was listening in on the convo on irc. So, even though it 'says' its GPL/X11, the actual license text is MIT, so I should use that tag? Its not my code, obviously, so I have no dog in that race anyways.

Quoted 58 lines
Quoted 58 lines
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +58 -0
+ */
+
+/dts-v1/;
+#include "rk3288-veyron-chromebook.dtsi"
+#include "cros-ec-sbs.dtsi"
+
+/ {
+	model = "Google Speedy";
+	compatible = "google,veyron-speedy-rev9", "google,veyron-speedy-rev8",
+		     "google,veyron-speedy-rev7", "google,veyron-speedy-rev6",
+		     "google,veyron-speedy-rev5", "google,veyron-speedy-rev4",
+		     "google,veyron-speedy-rev3", "google,veyron-speedy-rev2",
+		     "google,veyron-speedy", "google,veyron", "rockchip,rk3288";
+
+	chosen {
+		stdout-path = &uart2;
+	};
+
+	panel_regulator: panel-regulator {
+		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+		enable-active-high;
+		gpio = <&gpio7 RK_PB6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		pinctrl-0 = <&lcd_enable_h>;
+		regulator-name = "panel_regulator";
+		startup-delay-us = <100000>;
+		vin-supply = <&vcc33_sys>;
+	};
+
+	vcc18_lcd: vcc18-lcd {
+		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+		enable-active-high;
+		gpio = <&gpio2 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		pinctrl-0 = <&avdd_1v8_disp_en>;
+		regulator-name = "vcc18_lcd";
+		regulator-always-on;
+		regulator-boot-on;
+		vin-supply = <&vcc18_wl>;
+	};
+
+	backlight_regulator: backlight-regulator {
+		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+		enable-active-high;
+		gpio = <&gpio2 RK_PB4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		pinctrl-0 = <&bl_pwr_en>;
+		regulator-name = "backlight_regulator";
+		vin-supply = <&vcc33_sys>;
+		startup-delay-us = <15000>;
+	};
+};
+
+&dmc {
+	rockchip,pctl-timing = <0x215 0xc8 0x0 0x35 0x26 0x2 0x70 0x2000d
+		0x6 0x0 0x8 0x4 0x17 0x24 0xd 0x6
+		0x4 0x8 0x4 0x76 0x4 0x0 0x30 0x0
+		0x1 0x2 0x2 0x4 0x0 0x0 0xc0 0x4
Quoted 9 lines

arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts line 69

Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +5 -0
+		0x8 0x1f4>;
+	rockchip,phy-timing = <0x48d7dd93 0x187008d8 0x121076
+		0x0 0xc3 0x6 0x1>;
+	rockchip,sdram-params = <0x20D266A4 0x5B6 6 533000000 6 13 0>;
+};

Not sure if this should go into a separate dtsi. One of the maintainer will have a preferred way I think, so lets see what they will add.

Yeah, that is possible. However, here I just followed the example of rk3288-veyron-jerry.dtsi, which I (perhaps wrongly) assume can come in other memory size variants.

Quoted 289 lines
Quoted 288 lines
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +119 -0
+&gpio_keys {
+	power {
+		gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+	};
+};
+
+&backlight {
+	power-supply = <&backlight_regulator>;
+};
+
+&panel {
+	power-supply = <&panel_regulator>;
+};
+
+&rk808 {
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&pmic_int_l>;
+};
+
+&sdmmc {
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc_clk &sdmmc_cmd &sdmmc_cd_disabled &sdmmc_cd_gpio
+			&sdmmc_bus4>;
+	disable-wp;
+};
+
+&vcc_5v {
+	enable-active-high;
+	gpio = <&gpio7 RK_PC5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&drv_5v>;
+};
+
+&vcc50_hdmi {
+	enable-active-high;
+	gpio = <&gpio5 RK_PC3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&vcc50_hdmi_en>;
+};
+
+&edp {
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&edp_hpd>;
+};
+
+&pinctrl {
+	backlight {
+		bl_pwr_en: bl_pwr_en {
+			rockchip,pins = <2 12 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	buck-5v {
+		drv_5v: drv-5v {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 21 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	edp {
+		edp_hpd: edp_hpd {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 11 RK_FUNC_2 &pcfg_pull_down>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	emmc {
+		/* Make sure eMMC is not in reset */
+		emmc_deassert_reset: emmc-deassert-reset {
+			rockchip,pins = <2 9 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	hdmi {
+		vcc50_hdmi_en: vcc50-hdmi-en {
+			rockchip,pins = <5 19 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	lcd {
+		lcd_enable_h: lcd-en {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 14 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+
+		avdd_1v8_disp_en: avdd-1v8-disp-en {
+			rockchip,pins = <2 13 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	pmic {
+		dvs_1: dvs-1 {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 12 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_down>;
+		};
+
+		dvs_2: dvs-2 {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 15 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_down>;
+		};
+	};
+};
+
+&i2c4 {
+	status = "okay";
+
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&i2c4_xfer>;
+
+	trackpad at 15 {
+		compatible = "elan,i2c_touchpad";
+		interrupt-parent = <&gpio7>;
+		interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+		/*
+		 * Remove the inherited pinctrl settings to avoid clashing
+		 * with bus-wide ones.
+		 */
+		/delete-property/pinctrl-names;
+		/delete-property/pinctrl-0;
+		reg = <0x15>;
+		vcc-supply = <&vcc33_io>;
+		wakeup-source;
+	};
+};
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c +0 -0
index f3ea624277..9ae4802647 100644
@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ u32 spl_boot_device(void)

fallback:

#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_JERRY) || \
		defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBIT_MICKEY) || \
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c +2 -1
-		defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_MINNIE)
+		defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_MINNIE) || \
+		defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_SPEEDY)
	return BOOT_DEVICE_SPI;
#endif
	return BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1;
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288/Kconfig +11 -0
index 6beb26fd7a..8d1d37895d 100644
@@ -30,6 +30,17 @@ config TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_MINNIE
 	  functions. It includes 2 or 4GB of SDRAM and 16 or 32GB of
 	  internal MMC. The product name is ASUS Chromebook Flip.
 
+config TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_SPEEDY
+	bool "Google/Rockchip Veyron-Speedy Chromebook"
+	select BOARD_LATE_INIT
+	help
+	  Speedy is a RK3288-based clamshell device with 2 USB 2.0 ports,
+	  micro HDMI, an 11.6 inch display, micro-SD card,
+	  HD camera, touchpad, wifi and Bluetooth. It includes a Chrome OS
+	  EC (Cortex-M3) to provide access to the keyboard and battery
+	  functions. It includes 2 or 4GB of SDRAM and 16GB of internal MMC.
+	  The product name is Asus Chromebook C201PA.
+

config TARGET_EVB_RK3288

	bool "Evb-RK3288"
	select BOARD_LATE_INIT
board/google/veyron/Kconfig +0 -0
index 770e9aad28..7f55d78dac 100644
@@ -45,3 +45,19 @@ config BOARD_SPECIFIC_OPTIONS # dummy
 	def_bool y
 

endif

board/google/veyron/Kconfig +16 -0
+
+if TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_SPEEDY
+
+config SYS_BOARD
+	default "veyron"
+
+config SYS_VENDOR
+	default "google"
+
+config SYS_CONFIG_NAME
+	default "veyron"
+
+config BOARD_SPECIFIC_OPTIONS # dummy
+	def_bool y
+
+endif
configs/chromebook_speedy_defconfig new file +96 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..8789b56f37
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+CONFIG_ARM=y
+CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=0x00100000
+CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN=0x2000
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_RK3288=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT is not set
+CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_SPEEDY=y
+CONFIG_SPL_SPI_FLASH_SUPPORT=y
+CONFIG_SPL_SPI_SUPPORT=y
+CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R_ADDR=0x80000
+CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="rk3288-veyron-speedy"
+CONFIG_DEBUG_UART=y
+# CONFIG_ANDROID_BOOT_IMAGE is not set
+CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE=y
+# CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO is not set
+CONFIG_DISPLAY_BOARDINFO_LATE=y
+CONFIG_BOARD_EARLY_INIT_F=y
+CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R=y
+CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R_MALLOC_SIMPLE_LEN=0x2000
+CONFIG_SPL_SPI_LOAD=y
+CONFIG_FASTBOOT_FLASH=y
+CONFIG_FASTBOOT_FLASH_MMC_DEV=0
+CONFIG_CMD_GPIO=y
+CONFIG_CMD_GPT=y
+CONFIG_CMD_I2C=y
+CONFIG_CMD_MMC=y
+CONFIG_CMD_SF=y
+CONFIG_CMD_SF_TEST=y
+CONFIG_CMD_SPI=y
+CONFIG_CMD_USB=y
+# CONFIG_CMD_SETEXPR is not set
+CONFIG_CMD_CACHE=y
+CONFIG_CMD_TIME=y
+CONFIG_CMD_PMIC=y
+CONFIG_CMD_REGULATOR=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_DOS_PARTITION is not set
+# CONFIG_SPL_EFI_PARTITION is not set
+CONFIG_SPL_PARTITION_UUIDS=y
+CONFIG_SPL_OF_CONTROL=y
+CONFIG_OF_SPL_REMOVE_PROPS="pinctrl-0 pinctrl-names clock-names interrupt-parent assigned-clocks assigned-clock-rates assigned-clock-parents"
+CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA=y
+CONFIG_REGMAP=y
+CONFIG_SPL_REGMAP=y
+CONFIG_SYSCON=y
+CONFIG_SPL_SYSCON=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_SIMPLE_BUS is not set
+CONFIG_CLK=y
+CONFIG_SPL_CLK=y
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_GPIO=y
+CONFIG_I2C_CROS_EC_TUNNEL=y
+CONFIG_SYS_I2C_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_I2C_MUX=y
+CONFIG_DM_KEYBOARD=y
+CONFIG_CROS_EC_KEYB=y
+CONFIG_CROS_EC=y
+CONFIG_CROS_EC_SPI=y
+CONFIG_PWRSEQ=y
+CONFIG_MMC_DW=y
+CONFIG_MMC_DW_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_PINCTRL=y
+CONFIG_SPL_PINCTRL=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_PINCTRL_FULL is not set
+CONFIG_PINCTRL_ROCKCHIP_RK3288=y
+CONFIG_DM_PMIC=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_PMIC_CHILDREN is not set
+CONFIG_PMIC_RK8XX=y
+CONFIG_DM_REGULATOR_FIXED=y
+CONFIG_REGULATOR_RK8XX=y
+CONFIG_PWM_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_RAM=y
+CONFIG_SPL_RAM=y
+CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_BASE=0xff690000
+CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_CLOCK=24000000
+CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_SHIFT=2
+CONFIG_SYS_NS16550=y
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_SERIAL=y
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_SPI=y
+CONFIG_SYSRESET=y
+CONFIG_USB=y
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_USB2_PHY=y
+CONFIG_USB_STORAGE=y
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET=y
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET_MANUFACTURER="Rockchip"
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET_VENDOR_NUM=0x2207
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET_PRODUCT_NUM=0x320a
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET_DWC2_OTG=y
+CONFIG_USB_FUNCTION_MASS_STORAGE=y
+CONFIG_DM_VIDEO=y
+CONFIG_DISPLAY=y
+CONFIG_VIDEO_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_DISPLAY_ROCKCHIP_EDP=y
+CONFIG_DISPLAY_ROCKCHIP_HDMI=y
+CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF=y
+CONFIG_CMD_DHRYSTONE=y
+CONFIG_ERRNO_STR=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_OF_LIBFDT is not set
Signature · 6 lines
2.17.0

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot at lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
#7 lore raw

PATCH 2/3 rockchip: add support for veyron-speedy (ASUS Chromebook C201)

Quoted 131 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 33 lines · klaus.goger at theobroma-systems.com
Quoted 33 lines · Marty E. Plummer

This adds support for the ASUS C201, a RK3288-based clamshell device. The device tree comes from linus's linux tree at 87ef12027b9b1dd0e0b12cf311fbcb19f9d92539. The SDRAM parameters are for 4GB Samsung LPDDR3, decoded from coreboot's src/mainboard/google/veyron/sdram_inf/sdram-lpddr3-samsung-4GB.inc

---

arch/arm/dts/Makefile                     |   1 +
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts     | 189 ++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c |   3 +-
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288/Kconfig     |  11 ++
board/google/veyron/Kconfig               |  16 ++
configs/chromebook_speedy_defconfig       |  96 +++++++++++
6 files changed, 315 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts create mode 100644 configs/chromebook_speedy_defconfig

arch/arm/dts/Makefile +1 -0
index ac7667b1e8..ee04d9bedd 100644
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += \
 	rk3288-veyron-jerry.dtb \
 	rk3288-veyron-mickey.dtb \
 	rk3288-veyron-minnie.dtb \
+	rk3288-veyron-speedy.dtb \
 	rk3288-vyasa.dtb \
 	rk3328-evb.dtb \
 	rk3368-lion.dtb \
Quoted 8 lines

arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts

Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +0 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..d5383cef0d

This file looks quite different then the one I see on kernel.org with that revision id. So you are sure you imported that one?

Dafuq... it seems I borked something up in doing the patch juggling to turn my single-commit mess of a patch (you know, the 'get the thing to work branch') into a good patch series I messed up on this one.

Quoted 13 lines

arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts line 6

Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +6 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,189 @@
+/*
+ * Google Veyron Speedy Rev 1+ board device tree source
+ *
+ * Copyright 2015 Google, Inc
+ *
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier:	GPL-2.0

This file is dual licensed upstream, keep it that way. The comment will claim it's a X11 license but the license text below is actually MIT so you may want to use the MIT SPDX tag for that.

Yeah, I was listening in on the convo on irc. So, even though it 'says' its GPL/X11, the actual license text is MIT, so I should use that tag? Its not my code, obviously, so I have no dog in that race anyways.

Quoted 58 lines
Quoted 58 lines
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +58 -0
+ */
+
+/dts-v1/;
+#include "rk3288-veyron-chromebook.dtsi"
+#include "cros-ec-sbs.dtsi"
+
+/ {
+	model = "Google Speedy";
+	compatible = "google,veyron-speedy-rev9", "google,veyron-speedy-rev8",
+		     "google,veyron-speedy-rev7", "google,veyron-speedy-rev6",
+		     "google,veyron-speedy-rev5", "google,veyron-speedy-rev4",
+		     "google,veyron-speedy-rev3", "google,veyron-speedy-rev2",
+		     "google,veyron-speedy", "google,veyron", "rockchip,rk3288";
+
+	chosen {
+		stdout-path = &uart2;
+	};
+
+	panel_regulator: panel-regulator {
+		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+		enable-active-high;
+		gpio = <&gpio7 RK_PB6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		pinctrl-0 = <&lcd_enable_h>;
+		regulator-name = "panel_regulator";
+		startup-delay-us = <100000>;
+		vin-supply = <&vcc33_sys>;
+	};
+
+	vcc18_lcd: vcc18-lcd {
+		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+		enable-active-high;
+		gpio = <&gpio2 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		pinctrl-0 = <&avdd_1v8_disp_en>;
+		regulator-name = "vcc18_lcd";
+		regulator-always-on;
+		regulator-boot-on;
+		vin-supply = <&vcc18_wl>;
+	};
+
+	backlight_regulator: backlight-regulator {
+		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+		enable-active-high;
+		gpio = <&gpio2 RK_PB4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		pinctrl-0 = <&bl_pwr_en>;
+		regulator-name = "backlight_regulator";
+		vin-supply = <&vcc33_sys>;
+		startup-delay-us = <15000>;
+	};
+};
+
+&dmc {
+	rockchip,pctl-timing = <0x215 0xc8 0x0 0x35 0x26 0x2 0x70 0x2000d
+		0x6 0x0 0x8 0x4 0x17 0x24 0xd 0x6
+		0x4 0x8 0x4 0x76 0x4 0x0 0x30 0x0
+		0x1 0x2 0x2 0x4 0x0 0x0 0xc0 0x4
Quoted 9 lines

arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts line 69

Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +5 -0
+		0x8 0x1f4>;
+	rockchip,phy-timing = <0x48d7dd93 0x187008d8 0x121076
+		0x0 0xc3 0x6 0x1>;
+	rockchip,sdram-params = <0x20D266A4 0x5B6 6 533000000 6 13 0>;
+};

Not sure if this should go into a separate dtsi. One of the maintainer will have a preferred way I think, so lets see what they will add.

Quoted 3 lines

Yeah, that is possible. However, here I just followed the example of rk3288-veyron-jerry.dtsi, which I (perhaps wrongly) assume can come in other memory size variants.

Having a “-u-boot.dtsi” is the current practice (counting 85 such files as of today). We should follow this model here as well for any new devices we add.

Quoted 293 lines
Quoted 284 lines
Quoted 284 lines
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +119 -0
+&gpio_keys {
+	power {
+		gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+	};
+};
+
+&backlight {
+	power-supply = <&backlight_regulator>;
+};
+
+&panel {
+	power-supply = <&panel_regulator>;
+};
+
+&rk808 {
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&pmic_int_l>;
+};
+
+&sdmmc {
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc_clk &sdmmc_cmd &sdmmc_cd_disabled &sdmmc_cd_gpio
+			&sdmmc_bus4>;
+	disable-wp;
+};
+
+&vcc_5v {
+	enable-active-high;
+	gpio = <&gpio7 RK_PC5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&drv_5v>;
+};
+
+&vcc50_hdmi {
+	enable-active-high;
+	gpio = <&gpio5 RK_PC3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&vcc50_hdmi_en>;
+};
+
+&edp {
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&edp_hpd>;
+};
+
+&pinctrl {
+	backlight {
+		bl_pwr_en: bl_pwr_en {
+			rockchip,pins = <2 12 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	buck-5v {
+		drv_5v: drv-5v {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 21 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	edp {
+		edp_hpd: edp_hpd {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 11 RK_FUNC_2 &pcfg_pull_down>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	emmc {
+		/* Make sure eMMC is not in reset */
+		emmc_deassert_reset: emmc-deassert-reset {
+			rockchip,pins = <2 9 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	hdmi {
+		vcc50_hdmi_en: vcc50-hdmi-en {
+			rockchip,pins = <5 19 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	lcd {
+		lcd_enable_h: lcd-en {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 14 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+
+		avdd_1v8_disp_en: avdd-1v8-disp-en {
+			rockchip,pins = <2 13 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	pmic {
+		dvs_1: dvs-1 {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 12 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_down>;
+		};
+
+		dvs_2: dvs-2 {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 15 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_down>;
+		};
+	};
+};
+
+&i2c4 {
+	status = "okay";
+
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&i2c4_xfer>;
+
+	trackpad at 15 {
+		compatible = "elan,i2c_touchpad";
+		interrupt-parent = <&gpio7>;
+		interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+		/*
+		 * Remove the inherited pinctrl settings to avoid clashing
+		 * with bus-wide ones.
+		 */
+		/delete-property/pinctrl-names;
+		/delete-property/pinctrl-0;
+		reg = <0x15>;
+		vcc-supply = <&vcc33_io>;
+		wakeup-source;
+	};
+};
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c +0 -0
index f3ea624277..9ae4802647 100644
@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ u32 spl_boot_device(void)

fallback:

#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_JERRY) || \
		defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBIT_MICKEY) || \
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c +2 -1
-		defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_MINNIE)
+		defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_MINNIE) || \
+		defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_SPEEDY)
	return BOOT_DEVICE_SPI;
#endif
	return BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1;
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288/Kconfig +11 -0
index 6beb26fd7a..8d1d37895d 100644
@@ -30,6 +30,17 @@ config TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_MINNIE
 	  functions. It includes 2 or 4GB of SDRAM and 16 or 32GB of
 	  internal MMC. The product name is ASUS Chromebook Flip.
 
+config TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_SPEEDY
+	bool "Google/Rockchip Veyron-Speedy Chromebook"
+	select BOARD_LATE_INIT
+	help
+	  Speedy is a RK3288-based clamshell device with 2 USB 2.0 ports,
+	  micro HDMI, an 11.6 inch display, micro-SD card,
+	  HD camera, touchpad, wifi and Bluetooth. It includes a Chrome OS
+	  EC (Cortex-M3) to provide access to the keyboard and battery
+	  functions. It includes 2 or 4GB of SDRAM and 16GB of internal MMC.
+	  The product name is Asus Chromebook C201PA.
+

config TARGET_EVB_RK3288

	bool "Evb-RK3288"
	select BOARD_LATE_INIT
board/google/veyron/Kconfig +0 -0
index 770e9aad28..7f55d78dac 100644
@@ -45,3 +45,19 @@ config BOARD_SPECIFIC_OPTIONS # dummy
 	def_bool y
 

endif

board/google/veyron/Kconfig +16 -0
+
+if TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_SPEEDY
+
+config SYS_BOARD
+	default "veyron"
+
+config SYS_VENDOR
+	default "google"
+
+config SYS_CONFIG_NAME
+	default "veyron"
+
+config BOARD_SPECIFIC_OPTIONS # dummy
+	def_bool y
+
+endif
configs/chromebook_speedy_defconfig new file +96 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..8789b56f37
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+CONFIG_ARM=y
+CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=0x00100000
+CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN=0x2000
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_RK3288=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT is not set
+CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_SPEEDY=y
+CONFIG_SPL_SPI_FLASH_SUPPORT=y
+CONFIG_SPL_SPI_SUPPORT=y
+CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R_ADDR=0x80000
+CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="rk3288-veyron-speedy"
+CONFIG_DEBUG_UART=y
+# CONFIG_ANDROID_BOOT_IMAGE is not set
+CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE=y
+# CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO is not set
+CONFIG_DISPLAY_BOARDINFO_LATE=y
+CONFIG_BOARD_EARLY_INIT_F=y
+CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R=y
+CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R_MALLOC_SIMPLE_LEN=0x2000
+CONFIG_SPL_SPI_LOAD=y
+CONFIG_FASTBOOT_FLASH=y
+CONFIG_FASTBOOT_FLASH_MMC_DEV=0
+CONFIG_CMD_GPIO=y
+CONFIG_CMD_GPT=y
+CONFIG_CMD_I2C=y
+CONFIG_CMD_MMC=y
+CONFIG_CMD_SF=y
+CONFIG_CMD_SF_TEST=y
+CONFIG_CMD_SPI=y
+CONFIG_CMD_USB=y
+# CONFIG_CMD_SETEXPR is not set
+CONFIG_CMD_CACHE=y
+CONFIG_CMD_TIME=y
+CONFIG_CMD_PMIC=y
+CONFIG_CMD_REGULATOR=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_DOS_PARTITION is not set
+# CONFIG_SPL_EFI_PARTITION is not set
+CONFIG_SPL_PARTITION_UUIDS=y
+CONFIG_SPL_OF_CONTROL=y
+CONFIG_OF_SPL_REMOVE_PROPS="pinctrl-0 pinctrl-names clock-names interrupt-parent assigned-clocks assigned-clock-rates assigned-clock-parents"
+CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA=y
+CONFIG_REGMAP=y
+CONFIG_SPL_REGMAP=y
+CONFIG_SYSCON=y
+CONFIG_SPL_SYSCON=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_SIMPLE_BUS is not set
+CONFIG_CLK=y
+CONFIG_SPL_CLK=y
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_GPIO=y
+CONFIG_I2C_CROS_EC_TUNNEL=y
+CONFIG_SYS_I2C_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_I2C_MUX=y
+CONFIG_DM_KEYBOARD=y
+CONFIG_CROS_EC_KEYB=y
+CONFIG_CROS_EC=y
+CONFIG_CROS_EC_SPI=y
+CONFIG_PWRSEQ=y
+CONFIG_MMC_DW=y
+CONFIG_MMC_DW_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_PINCTRL=y
+CONFIG_SPL_PINCTRL=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_PINCTRL_FULL is not set
+CONFIG_PINCTRL_ROCKCHIP_RK3288=y
+CONFIG_DM_PMIC=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_PMIC_CHILDREN is not set
+CONFIG_PMIC_RK8XX=y
+CONFIG_DM_REGULATOR_FIXED=y
+CONFIG_REGULATOR_RK8XX=y
+CONFIG_PWM_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_RAM=y
+CONFIG_SPL_RAM=y
+CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_BASE=0xff690000
+CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_CLOCK=24000000
+CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_SHIFT=2
+CONFIG_SYS_NS16550=y
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_SERIAL=y
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_SPI=y
+CONFIG_SYSRESET=y
+CONFIG_USB=y
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_USB2_PHY=y
+CONFIG_USB_STORAGE=y
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET=y
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET_MANUFACTURER="Rockchip"
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET_VENDOR_NUM=0x2207
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET_PRODUCT_NUM=0x320a
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET_DWC2_OTG=y
+CONFIG_USB_FUNCTION_MASS_STORAGE=y
+CONFIG_DM_VIDEO=y
+CONFIG_DISPLAY=y
+CONFIG_VIDEO_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_DISPLAY_ROCKCHIP_EDP=y
+CONFIG_DISPLAY_ROCKCHIP_HDMI=y
+CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF=y
+CONFIG_CMD_DHRYSTONE=y
+CONFIG_ERRNO_STR=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_OF_LIBFDT is not set
Signature · 1 line
2.17.0
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 4 lines

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot at lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot at lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

#8 lore raw

PATCH 2/3 rockchip: add support for veyron-speedy (ASUS Chromebook C201)

Quoted 131 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich
Quoted 131 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 33 lines · klaus.goger at theobroma-systems.com
Quoted 33 lines · Marty E. Plummer

This adds support for the ASUS C201, a RK3288-based clamshell device. The device tree comes from linus's linux tree at 87ef12027b9b1dd0e0b12cf311fbcb19f9d92539. The SDRAM parameters are for 4GB Samsung LPDDR3, decoded from coreboot's src/mainboard/google/veyron/sdram_inf/sdram-lpddr3-samsung-4GB.inc

---

arch/arm/dts/Makefile                     |   1 +
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts     | 189 ++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c |   3 +-
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288/Kconfig     |  11 ++
board/google/veyron/Kconfig               |  16 ++
configs/chromebook_speedy_defconfig       |  96 +++++++++++
6 files changed, 315 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts create mode 100644 configs/chromebook_speedy_defconfig

arch/arm/dts/Makefile +1 -0
index ac7667b1e8..ee04d9bedd 100644
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += \
 	rk3288-veyron-jerry.dtb \
 	rk3288-veyron-mickey.dtb \
 	rk3288-veyron-minnie.dtb \
+	rk3288-veyron-speedy.dtb \
 	rk3288-vyasa.dtb \
 	rk3328-evb.dtb \
 	rk3368-lion.dtb \
Quoted 8 lines

arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts

Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +0 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..d5383cef0d

This file looks quite different then the one I see on kernel.org with that revision id. So you are sure you imported that one?

Dafuq... it seems I borked something up in doing the patch juggling to turn my single-commit mess of a patch (you know, the 'get the thing to work branch') into a good patch series I messed up on this one.

Quoted 13 lines

arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts line 6

Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +6 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,189 @@
+/*
+ * Google Veyron Speedy Rev 1+ board device tree source
+ *
+ * Copyright 2015 Google, Inc
+ *
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier:	GPL-2.0

This file is dual licensed upstream, keep it that way. The comment will claim it's a X11 license but the license text below is actually MIT so you may want to use the MIT SPDX tag for that.

Yeah, I was listening in on the convo on irc. So, even though it 'says' its GPL/X11, the actual license text is MIT, so I should use that tag? Its not my code, obviously, so I have no dog in that race anyways.

Quoted 67 lines
Quoted 53 lines
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +53 -0
+ */
+
+/dts-v1/;
+#include "rk3288-veyron-chromebook.dtsi"
+#include "cros-ec-sbs.dtsi"
+
+/ {
+	model = "Google Speedy";
+	compatible = "google,veyron-speedy-rev9", "google,veyron-speedy-rev8",
+		     "google,veyron-speedy-rev7", "google,veyron-speedy-rev6",
+		     "google,veyron-speedy-rev5", "google,veyron-speedy-rev4",
+		     "google,veyron-speedy-rev3", "google,veyron-speedy-rev2",
+		     "google,veyron-speedy", "google,veyron", "rockchip,rk3288";
+
+	chosen {
+		stdout-path = &uart2;
+	};
+
+	panel_regulator: panel-regulator {
+		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+		enable-active-high;
+		gpio = <&gpio7 RK_PB6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		pinctrl-0 = <&lcd_enable_h>;
+		regulator-name = "panel_regulator";
+		startup-delay-us = <100000>;
+		vin-supply = <&vcc33_sys>;
+	};
+
+	vcc18_lcd: vcc18-lcd {
+		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+		enable-active-high;
+		gpio = <&gpio2 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		pinctrl-0 = <&avdd_1v8_disp_en>;
+		regulator-name = "vcc18_lcd";
+		regulator-always-on;
+		regulator-boot-on;
+		vin-supply = <&vcc18_wl>;
+	};
+
+	backlight_regulator: backlight-regulator {
+		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+		enable-active-high;
+		gpio = <&gpio2 RK_PB4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		pinctrl-0 = <&bl_pwr_en>;
+		regulator-name = "backlight_regulator";
+		vin-supply = <&vcc33_sys>;
+		startup-delay-us = <15000>;
+	};
+};
+

arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts line 69

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +10 -0
+&dmc {
+	rockchip,pctl-timing = <0x215 0xc8 0x0 0x35 0x26 0x2 0x70 0x2000d
+		0x6 0x0 0x8 0x4 0x17 0x24 0xd 0x6
+		0x4 0x8 0x4 0x76 0x4 0x0 0x30 0x0
+		0x1 0x2 0x2 0x4 0x0 0x0 0xc0 0x4
+		0x8 0x1f4>;
+	rockchip,phy-timing = <0x48d7dd93 0x187008d8 0x121076
+		0x0 0xc3 0x6 0x1>;
+	rockchip,sdram-params = <0x20D266A4 0x5B6 6 533000000 6 13 0>;
+};

Not sure if this should go into a separate dtsi. One of the maintainer will have a preferred way I think, so lets see what they will add.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Yeah, that is possible. However, here I just followed the example of rk3288-veyron-jerry.dtsi, which I (perhaps wrongly) assume can come in other memory size variants.

Having a “-u-boot.dtsi” is the current practice (counting 85 such files as of today). We should follow this model here as well for any new devices we add.

Fair. So what should go into the -u-boot.dtsi file? everything not standard to the imported dts/dtsi from linux?

Quoted 294 lines
Quoted 293 lines
Quoted 284 lines
Quoted 284 lines
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +119 -0
+&gpio_keys {
+	power {
+		gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+	};
+};
+
+&backlight {
+	power-supply = <&backlight_regulator>;
+};
+
+&panel {
+	power-supply = <&panel_regulator>;
+};
+
+&rk808 {
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&pmic_int_l>;
+};
+
+&sdmmc {
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc_clk &sdmmc_cmd &sdmmc_cd_disabled &sdmmc_cd_gpio
+			&sdmmc_bus4>;
+	disable-wp;
+};
+
+&vcc_5v {
+	enable-active-high;
+	gpio = <&gpio7 RK_PC5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&drv_5v>;
+};
+
+&vcc50_hdmi {
+	enable-active-high;
+	gpio = <&gpio5 RK_PC3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&vcc50_hdmi_en>;
+};
+
+&edp {
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&edp_hpd>;
+};
+
+&pinctrl {
+	backlight {
+		bl_pwr_en: bl_pwr_en {
+			rockchip,pins = <2 12 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	buck-5v {
+		drv_5v: drv-5v {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 21 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	edp {
+		edp_hpd: edp_hpd {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 11 RK_FUNC_2 &pcfg_pull_down>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	emmc {
+		/* Make sure eMMC is not in reset */
+		emmc_deassert_reset: emmc-deassert-reset {
+			rockchip,pins = <2 9 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	hdmi {
+		vcc50_hdmi_en: vcc50-hdmi-en {
+			rockchip,pins = <5 19 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	lcd {
+		lcd_enable_h: lcd-en {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 14 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+
+		avdd_1v8_disp_en: avdd-1v8-disp-en {
+			rockchip,pins = <2 13 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	pmic {
+		dvs_1: dvs-1 {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 12 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_down>;
+		};
+
+		dvs_2: dvs-2 {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 15 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_down>;
+		};
+	};
+};
+
+&i2c4 {
+	status = "okay";
+
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&i2c4_xfer>;
+
+	trackpad at 15 {
+		compatible = "elan,i2c_touchpad";
+		interrupt-parent = <&gpio7>;
+		interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+		/*
+		 * Remove the inherited pinctrl settings to avoid clashing
+		 * with bus-wide ones.
+		 */
+		/delete-property/pinctrl-names;
+		/delete-property/pinctrl-0;
+		reg = <0x15>;
+		vcc-supply = <&vcc33_io>;
+		wakeup-source;
+	};
+};
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c +0 -0
index f3ea624277..9ae4802647 100644
@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ u32 spl_boot_device(void)

fallback:

#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_JERRY) || \
		defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBIT_MICKEY) || \
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c +2 -1
-		defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_MINNIE)
+		defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_MINNIE) || \
+		defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_SPEEDY)
	return BOOT_DEVICE_SPI;
#endif
	return BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1;
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288/Kconfig +11 -0
index 6beb26fd7a..8d1d37895d 100644
@@ -30,6 +30,17 @@ config TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_MINNIE
 	  functions. It includes 2 or 4GB of SDRAM and 16 or 32GB of
 	  internal MMC. The product name is ASUS Chromebook Flip.
 
+config TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_SPEEDY
+	bool "Google/Rockchip Veyron-Speedy Chromebook"
+	select BOARD_LATE_INIT
+	help
+	  Speedy is a RK3288-based clamshell device with 2 USB 2.0 ports,
+	  micro HDMI, an 11.6 inch display, micro-SD card,
+	  HD camera, touchpad, wifi and Bluetooth. It includes a Chrome OS
+	  EC (Cortex-M3) to provide access to the keyboard and battery
+	  functions. It includes 2 or 4GB of SDRAM and 16GB of internal MMC.
+	  The product name is Asus Chromebook C201PA.
+

config TARGET_EVB_RK3288

	bool "Evb-RK3288"
	select BOARD_LATE_INIT
board/google/veyron/Kconfig +0 -0
index 770e9aad28..7f55d78dac 100644
@@ -45,3 +45,19 @@ config BOARD_SPECIFIC_OPTIONS # dummy
 	def_bool y
 

endif

board/google/veyron/Kconfig +16 -0
+
+if TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_SPEEDY
+
+config SYS_BOARD
+	default "veyron"
+
+config SYS_VENDOR
+	default "google"
+
+config SYS_CONFIG_NAME
+	default "veyron"
+
+config BOARD_SPECIFIC_OPTIONS # dummy
+	def_bool y
+
+endif
configs/chromebook_speedy_defconfig new file +96 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..8789b56f37
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+CONFIG_ARM=y
+CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=0x00100000
+CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN=0x2000
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_RK3288=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT is not set
+CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_SPEEDY=y
+CONFIG_SPL_SPI_FLASH_SUPPORT=y
+CONFIG_SPL_SPI_SUPPORT=y
+CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R_ADDR=0x80000
+CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="rk3288-veyron-speedy"
+CONFIG_DEBUG_UART=y
+# CONFIG_ANDROID_BOOT_IMAGE is not set
+CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE=y
+# CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO is not set
+CONFIG_DISPLAY_BOARDINFO_LATE=y
+CONFIG_BOARD_EARLY_INIT_F=y
+CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R=y
+CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R_MALLOC_SIMPLE_LEN=0x2000
+CONFIG_SPL_SPI_LOAD=y
+CONFIG_FASTBOOT_FLASH=y
+CONFIG_FASTBOOT_FLASH_MMC_DEV=0
+CONFIG_CMD_GPIO=y
+CONFIG_CMD_GPT=y
+CONFIG_CMD_I2C=y
+CONFIG_CMD_MMC=y
+CONFIG_CMD_SF=y
+CONFIG_CMD_SF_TEST=y
+CONFIG_CMD_SPI=y
+CONFIG_CMD_USB=y
+# CONFIG_CMD_SETEXPR is not set
+CONFIG_CMD_CACHE=y
+CONFIG_CMD_TIME=y
+CONFIG_CMD_PMIC=y
+CONFIG_CMD_REGULATOR=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_DOS_PARTITION is not set
+# CONFIG_SPL_EFI_PARTITION is not set
+CONFIG_SPL_PARTITION_UUIDS=y
+CONFIG_SPL_OF_CONTROL=y
+CONFIG_OF_SPL_REMOVE_PROPS="pinctrl-0 pinctrl-names clock-names interrupt-parent assigned-clocks assigned-clock-rates assigned-clock-parents"
+CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA=y
+CONFIG_REGMAP=y
+CONFIG_SPL_REGMAP=y
+CONFIG_SYSCON=y
+CONFIG_SPL_SYSCON=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_SIMPLE_BUS is not set
+CONFIG_CLK=y
+CONFIG_SPL_CLK=y
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_GPIO=y
+CONFIG_I2C_CROS_EC_TUNNEL=y
+CONFIG_SYS_I2C_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_I2C_MUX=y
+CONFIG_DM_KEYBOARD=y
+CONFIG_CROS_EC_KEYB=y
+CONFIG_CROS_EC=y
+CONFIG_CROS_EC_SPI=y
+CONFIG_PWRSEQ=y
+CONFIG_MMC_DW=y
+CONFIG_MMC_DW_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_PINCTRL=y
+CONFIG_SPL_PINCTRL=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_PINCTRL_FULL is not set
+CONFIG_PINCTRL_ROCKCHIP_RK3288=y
+CONFIG_DM_PMIC=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_PMIC_CHILDREN is not set
+CONFIG_PMIC_RK8XX=y
+CONFIG_DM_REGULATOR_FIXED=y
+CONFIG_REGULATOR_RK8XX=y
+CONFIG_PWM_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_RAM=y
+CONFIG_SPL_RAM=y
+CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_BASE=0xff690000
+CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_CLOCK=24000000
+CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_SHIFT=2
+CONFIG_SYS_NS16550=y
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_SERIAL=y
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_SPI=y
+CONFIG_SYSRESET=y
+CONFIG_USB=y
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_USB2_PHY=y
+CONFIG_USB_STORAGE=y
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET=y
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET_MANUFACTURER="Rockchip"
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET_VENDOR_NUM=0x2207
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET_PRODUCT_NUM=0x320a
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET_DWC2_OTG=y
+CONFIG_USB_FUNCTION_MASS_STORAGE=y
+CONFIG_DM_VIDEO=y
+CONFIG_DISPLAY=y
+CONFIG_VIDEO_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_DISPLAY_ROCKCHIP_EDP=y
+CONFIG_DISPLAY_ROCKCHIP_HDMI=y
+CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF=y
+CONFIG_CMD_DHRYSTONE=y
+CONFIG_ERRNO_STR=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_OF_LIBFDT is not set
Signature · 1 line
2.17.0
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 4 lines

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot at lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot at lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

#9 lore raw

PATCH 2/3 rockchip: add support for veyron-speedy (ASUS Chromebook C201)

Quoted 139 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 135 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich
Quoted 134 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 33 lines · klaus.goger at theobroma-systems.com
Quoted 33 lines · Marty E. Plummer

This adds support for the ASUS C201, a RK3288-based clamshell device. The device tree comes from linus's linux tree at 87ef12027b9b1dd0e0b12cf311fbcb19f9d92539. The SDRAM parameters are for 4GB Samsung LPDDR3, decoded from coreboot's src/mainboard/google/veyron/sdram_inf/sdram-lpddr3-samsung-4GB.inc

---

arch/arm/dts/Makefile                     |   1 +
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts     | 189 ++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c |   3 +-
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288/Kconfig     |  11 ++
board/google/veyron/Kconfig               |  16 ++
configs/chromebook_speedy_defconfig       |  96 +++++++++++
6 files changed, 315 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts create mode 100644 configs/chromebook_speedy_defconfig

arch/arm/dts/Makefile +1 -0
index ac7667b1e8..ee04d9bedd 100644
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += \
 	rk3288-veyron-jerry.dtb \
 	rk3288-veyron-mickey.dtb \
 	rk3288-veyron-minnie.dtb \
+	rk3288-veyron-speedy.dtb \
 	rk3288-vyasa.dtb \
 	rk3328-evb.dtb \
 	rk3368-lion.dtb \
Quoted 8 lines

arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts

Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +0 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..d5383cef0d

This file looks quite different then the one I see on kernel.org with that revision id. So you are sure you imported that one?

Dafuq... it seems I borked something up in doing the patch juggling to turn my single-commit mess of a patch (you know, the 'get the thing to work branch') into a good patch series I messed up on this one.

Quoted 13 lines

arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts line 6

Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +6 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,189 @@
+/*
+ * Google Veyron Speedy Rev 1+ board device tree source
+ *
+ * Copyright 2015 Google, Inc
+ *
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier:	GPL-2.0

This file is dual licensed upstream, keep it that way. The comment will claim it's a X11 license but the license text below is actually MIT so you may want to use the MIT SPDX tag for that.

Yeah, I was listening in on the convo on irc. So, even though it 'says' its GPL/X11, the actual license text is MIT, so I should use that tag? Its not my code, obviously, so I have no dog in that race anyways.

Quoted 58 lines
Quoted 58 lines
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +58 -0
+ */
+
+/dts-v1/;
+#include "rk3288-veyron-chromebook.dtsi"
+#include "cros-ec-sbs.dtsi"
+
+/ {
+	model = "Google Speedy";
+	compatible = "google,veyron-speedy-rev9", "google,veyron-speedy-rev8",
+		     "google,veyron-speedy-rev7", "google,veyron-speedy-rev6",
+		     "google,veyron-speedy-rev5", "google,veyron-speedy-rev4",
+		     "google,veyron-speedy-rev3", "google,veyron-speedy-rev2",
+		     "google,veyron-speedy", "google,veyron", "rockchip,rk3288";
+
+	chosen {
+		stdout-path = &uart2;
+	};
+
+	panel_regulator: panel-regulator {
+		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+		enable-active-high;
+		gpio = <&gpio7 RK_PB6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		pinctrl-0 = <&lcd_enable_h>;
+		regulator-name = "panel_regulator";
+		startup-delay-us = <100000>;
+		vin-supply = <&vcc33_sys>;
+	};
+
+	vcc18_lcd: vcc18-lcd {
+		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+		enable-active-high;
+		gpio = <&gpio2 RK_PB5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		pinctrl-0 = <&avdd_1v8_disp_en>;
+		regulator-name = "vcc18_lcd";
+		regulator-always-on;
+		regulator-boot-on;
+		vin-supply = <&vcc18_wl>;
+	};
+
+	backlight_regulator: backlight-regulator {
+		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+		enable-active-high;
+		gpio = <&gpio2 RK_PB4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		pinctrl-0 = <&bl_pwr_en>;
+		regulator-name = "backlight_regulator";
+		vin-supply = <&vcc33_sys>;
+		startup-delay-us = <15000>;
+	};
+};
+
+&dmc {
+	rockchip,pctl-timing = <0x215 0xc8 0x0 0x35 0x26 0x2 0x70 0x2000d
+		0x6 0x0 0x8 0x4 0x17 0x24 0xd 0x6
+		0x4 0x8 0x4 0x76 0x4 0x0 0x30 0x0
+		0x1 0x2 0x2 0x4 0x0 0x0 0xc0 0x4
Quoted 9 lines

arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts line 69

Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +5 -0
+		0x8 0x1f4>;
+	rockchip,phy-timing = <0x48d7dd93 0x187008d8 0x121076
+		0x0 0xc3 0x6 0x1>;
+	rockchip,sdram-params = <0x20D266A4 0x5B6 6 533000000 6 13 0>;
+};

Not sure if this should go into a separate dtsi. One of the maintainer will have a preferred way I think, so lets see what they will add.

Yeah, that is possible. However, here I just followed the example of rk3288-veyron-jerry.dtsi, which I (perhaps wrongly) assume can come in other memory size variants.

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Having a “-u-boot.dtsi” is the current practice (counting 85 such files as of today). We should follow this model here as well for any new devices we add.

Fair. So what should go into the -u-boot.dtsi file? everything not standard to the imported dts/dtsi from linux?

Yes.
Example will include:
- any ‘prereloc’ tagging
- initialisation parameters for the DMC if they are used by SPL only (and are thus absent from the Linux dts) — I don’t know what the situation on the r3288 platform is for this in Linux

Quoted 293 lines
Quoted 293 lines
Quoted 293 lines
Quoted 284 lines
Quoted 284 lines
arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts new file +119 -0
+&gpio_keys {
+	power {
+		gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PA5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+	};
+};
+
+&backlight {
+	power-supply = <&backlight_regulator>;
+};
+
+&panel {
+	power-supply = <&panel_regulator>;
+};
+
+&rk808 {
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&pmic_int_l>;
+};
+
+&sdmmc {
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc_clk &sdmmc_cmd &sdmmc_cd_disabled &sdmmc_cd_gpio
+			&sdmmc_bus4>;
+	disable-wp;
+};
+
+&vcc_5v {
+	enable-active-high;
+	gpio = <&gpio7 RK_PC5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&drv_5v>;
+};
+
+&vcc50_hdmi {
+	enable-active-high;
+	gpio = <&gpio5 RK_PC3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&vcc50_hdmi_en>;
+};
+
+&edp {
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&edp_hpd>;
+};
+
+&pinctrl {
+	backlight {
+		bl_pwr_en: bl_pwr_en {
+			rockchip,pins = <2 12 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	buck-5v {
+		drv_5v: drv-5v {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 21 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	edp {
+		edp_hpd: edp_hpd {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 11 RK_FUNC_2 &pcfg_pull_down>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	emmc {
+		/* Make sure eMMC is not in reset */
+		emmc_deassert_reset: emmc-deassert-reset {
+			rockchip,pins = <2 9 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	hdmi {
+		vcc50_hdmi_en: vcc50-hdmi-en {
+			rockchip,pins = <5 19 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	lcd {
+		lcd_enable_h: lcd-en {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 14 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+
+		avdd_1v8_disp_en: avdd-1v8-disp-en {
+			rockchip,pins = <2 13 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	pmic {
+		dvs_1: dvs-1 {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 12 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_down>;
+		};
+
+		dvs_2: dvs-2 {
+			rockchip,pins = <7 15 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_down>;
+		};
+	};
+};
+
+&i2c4 {
+	status = "okay";
+
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&i2c4_xfer>;
+
+	trackpad at 15 {
+		compatible = "elan,i2c_touchpad";
+		interrupt-parent = <&gpio7>;
+		interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+		/*
+		 * Remove the inherited pinctrl settings to avoid clashing
+		 * with bus-wide ones.
+		 */
+		/delete-property/pinctrl-names;
+		/delete-property/pinctrl-0;
+		reg = <0x15>;
+		vcc-supply = <&vcc33_io>;
+		wakeup-source;
+	};
+};
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c +0 -0
index f3ea624277..9ae4802647 100644
@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ u32 spl_boot_device(void)

fallback:

#elif defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_JERRY) || \
		defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBIT_MICKEY) || \
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c +2 -1
-		defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_MINNIE)
+		defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_MINNIE) || \
+		defined(CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_SPEEDY)
	return BOOT_DEVICE_SPI;
#endif
	return BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1;
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288/Kconfig +11 -0
index 6beb26fd7a..8d1d37895d 100644
@@ -30,6 +30,17 @@ config TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_MINNIE
 	  functions. It includes 2 or 4GB of SDRAM and 16 or 32GB of
 	  internal MMC. The product name is ASUS Chromebook Flip.
 
+config TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_SPEEDY
+	bool "Google/Rockchip Veyron-Speedy Chromebook"
+	select BOARD_LATE_INIT
+	help
+	  Speedy is a RK3288-based clamshell device with 2 USB 2.0 ports,
+	  micro HDMI, an 11.6 inch display, micro-SD card,
+	  HD camera, touchpad, wifi and Bluetooth. It includes a Chrome OS
+	  EC (Cortex-M3) to provide access to the keyboard and battery
+	  functions. It includes 2 or 4GB of SDRAM and 16GB of internal MMC.
+	  The product name is Asus Chromebook C201PA.
+

config TARGET_EVB_RK3288

	bool "Evb-RK3288"
	select BOARD_LATE_INIT
board/google/veyron/Kconfig +0 -0
index 770e9aad28..7f55d78dac 100644
@@ -45,3 +45,19 @@ config BOARD_SPECIFIC_OPTIONS # dummy
 	def_bool y
 

endif

board/google/veyron/Kconfig +16 -0
+
+if TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_SPEEDY
+
+config SYS_BOARD
+	default "veyron"
+
+config SYS_VENDOR
+	default "google"
+
+config SYS_CONFIG_NAME
+	default "veyron"
+
+config BOARD_SPECIFIC_OPTIONS # dummy
+	def_bool y
+
+endif
configs/chromebook_speedy_defconfig new file +96 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..8789b56f37
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+CONFIG_ARM=y
+CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=0x00100000
+CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN=0x2000
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_RK3288=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT is not set
+CONFIG_TARGET_CHROMEBOOK_SPEEDY=y
+CONFIG_SPL_SPI_FLASH_SUPPORT=y
+CONFIG_SPL_SPI_SUPPORT=y
+CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R_ADDR=0x80000
+CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="rk3288-veyron-speedy"
+CONFIG_DEBUG_UART=y
+# CONFIG_ANDROID_BOOT_IMAGE is not set
+CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE=y
+# CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO is not set
+CONFIG_DISPLAY_BOARDINFO_LATE=y
+CONFIG_BOARD_EARLY_INIT_F=y
+CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R=y
+CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R_MALLOC_SIMPLE_LEN=0x2000
+CONFIG_SPL_SPI_LOAD=y
+CONFIG_FASTBOOT_FLASH=y
+CONFIG_FASTBOOT_FLASH_MMC_DEV=0
+CONFIG_CMD_GPIO=y
+CONFIG_CMD_GPT=y
+CONFIG_CMD_I2C=y
+CONFIG_CMD_MMC=y
+CONFIG_CMD_SF=y
+CONFIG_CMD_SF_TEST=y
+CONFIG_CMD_SPI=y
+CONFIG_CMD_USB=y
+# CONFIG_CMD_SETEXPR is not set
+CONFIG_CMD_CACHE=y
+CONFIG_CMD_TIME=y
+CONFIG_CMD_PMIC=y
+CONFIG_CMD_REGULATOR=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_DOS_PARTITION is not set
+# CONFIG_SPL_EFI_PARTITION is not set
+CONFIG_SPL_PARTITION_UUIDS=y
+CONFIG_SPL_OF_CONTROL=y
+CONFIG_OF_SPL_REMOVE_PROPS="pinctrl-0 pinctrl-names clock-names interrupt-parent assigned-clocks assigned-clock-rates assigned-clock-parents"
+CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA=y
+CONFIG_REGMAP=y
+CONFIG_SPL_REGMAP=y
+CONFIG_SYSCON=y
+CONFIG_SPL_SYSCON=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_SIMPLE_BUS is not set
+CONFIG_CLK=y
+CONFIG_SPL_CLK=y
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_GPIO=y
+CONFIG_I2C_CROS_EC_TUNNEL=y
+CONFIG_SYS_I2C_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_I2C_MUX=y
+CONFIG_DM_KEYBOARD=y
+CONFIG_CROS_EC_KEYB=y
+CONFIG_CROS_EC=y
+CONFIG_CROS_EC_SPI=y
+CONFIG_PWRSEQ=y
+CONFIG_MMC_DW=y
+CONFIG_MMC_DW_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_PINCTRL=y
+CONFIG_SPL_PINCTRL=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_PINCTRL_FULL is not set
+CONFIG_PINCTRL_ROCKCHIP_RK3288=y
+CONFIG_DM_PMIC=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_PMIC_CHILDREN is not set
+CONFIG_PMIC_RK8XX=y
+CONFIG_DM_REGULATOR_FIXED=y
+CONFIG_REGULATOR_RK8XX=y
+CONFIG_PWM_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_RAM=y
+CONFIG_SPL_RAM=y
+CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_BASE=0xff690000
+CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_CLOCK=24000000
+CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_SHIFT=2
+CONFIG_SYS_NS16550=y
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_SERIAL=y
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_SPI=y
+CONFIG_SYSRESET=y
+CONFIG_USB=y
+CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_USB2_PHY=y
+CONFIG_USB_STORAGE=y
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET=y
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET_MANUFACTURER="Rockchip"
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET_VENDOR_NUM=0x2207
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET_PRODUCT_NUM=0x320a
+CONFIG_USB_GADGET_DWC2_OTG=y
+CONFIG_USB_FUNCTION_MASS_STORAGE=y
+CONFIG_DM_VIDEO=y
+CONFIG_DISPLAY=y
+CONFIG_VIDEO_ROCKCHIP=y
+CONFIG_DISPLAY_ROCKCHIP_EDP=y
+CONFIG_DISPLAY_ROCKCHIP_HDMI=y
+CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF=y
+CONFIG_CMD_DHRYSTONE=y
+CONFIG_ERRNO_STR=y
+# CONFIG_SPL_OF_LIBFDT is not set
Signature · 1 line
2.17.0
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 4 lines

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot at lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot at lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

#10 lore raw

PATCH 3/3 rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

In reply to a message not in the archive

Taken from coreboot's src/soc/rockchip/rk3288/sdram.c

Without this change, my u-boot build for the asus c201 chromebook (4GiB) is incorrectly detected as 0 Bytes of ram.

---
 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +37 -25
index 76dbdc8715..a9c9f970a4 100644
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/arch/sdram_common.h>
 #include <dm/uclass-internal.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
@@ -19,34 +21,44 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 	size_t size_mb = 0;
 	u32 ch;
 
-	u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
-	u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
-		       & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
+	if (!size_mb) {
 
-	debug("%s %x %x\n", __func__, (u32)reg, sys_reg);
-	for (ch = 0; ch < ch_num; ch++) {
-		rank = 1 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_RANK_SHIFT(ch) &
-			SYS_REG_RANK_MASK);
-		col = 9 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_COL_SHIFT(ch) & SYS_REG_COL_MASK);
-		bk = 3 - ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_BK_SHIFT(ch)) & SYS_REG_BK_MASK);
-		cs0_row = 13 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_CS0_ROW_SHIFT(ch) &
-				SYS_REG_CS0_ROW_MASK);
-		cs1_row = 13 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_CS1_ROW_SHIFT(ch) &
-				SYS_REG_CS1_ROW_MASK);
-		bw = (2 >> ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_BW_SHIFT(ch)) &
-			SYS_REG_BW_MASK));
-		row_3_4 = sys_reg >> SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_SHIFT(ch) &
-			SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
+		u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
+		u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
+			       & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
 
-		chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20));
+		debug("%s %x %x\n", __func__, (u32)reg, sys_reg);
+		for (ch = 0; ch < ch_num; ch++) {
+			rank = 1 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_RANK_SHIFT(ch) &
+				SYS_REG_RANK_MASK);
+			col = 9 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_COL_SHIFT(ch) & SYS_REG_COL_MASK);
+			bk = 3 - ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_BK_SHIFT(ch)) & SYS_REG_BK_MASK);
+			cs0_row = 13 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_CS0_ROW_SHIFT(ch) &
+					SYS_REG_CS0_ROW_MASK);
+			cs1_row = 13 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_CS1_ROW_SHIFT(ch) &
+					SYS_REG_CS1_ROW_MASK);
+			bw = (2 >> ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_BW_SHIFT(ch)) &
+				SYS_REG_BW_MASK));
+			row_3_4 = sys_reg >> SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_SHIFT(ch) &
+				SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
 
-		if (rank > 1)
-			chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row);
-		if (row_3_4)
-			chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4;
-		size_mb += chipsize_mb;
-		debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n",
-		      rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4);
+			chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20));
+
+			if (rank > 1)
+				chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row);
+			if (row_3_4)
+				chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4;
+			size_mb += chipsize_mb;
+			debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n",
+			      rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4);
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * we use the 0x00000000~0xfeffffff space
+		 * since 0xff000000~0xffffffff is soc register space
+		 * so we reserve it
+		 */
+		size_mb = min(size_mb, 0xff000000/SZ_1M);
 	}
 
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;
Signature · 1 line
2.17.0
#11 lore raw

PATCH 3/3 rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

CC Philipp and Simon due maintainership (you may want to use get_maintainer.pl in the future) and Kever as the original author of the file.

Quoted 17 lines · Marty E. Plummer

Taken from coreboot's src/soc/rockchip/rk3288/sdram.c

Without this change, my u-boot build for the asus c201 chromebook (4GiB) is incorrectly detected as 0 Bytes of ram.

---
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++-----------

1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +0 -0
index 76dbdc8715..a9c9f970a4 100644

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c line 14

Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +2 -0
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/arch/sdram_common.h>
 #include <dm/uclass-internal.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>

Is adding these headers really necessary?
common.h already includes kernel.h and sizes.h (with some redirections of config.h)

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 24

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +1 -3
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
@@ -19,34 +21,44 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 	size_t size_mb = 0;
 	u32 ch;
 
-	u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
-	u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
-		       & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
+	if (!size_mb) {

Is this really required? I don’t see a way that size_mb will already be set at this point. But it blows up your diff that it takes quite a while to see that your only real change is the size_mb = min(...) part at the end.

Quoted 47 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +23 -22
-	debug("%s %x %x\n", __func__, (u32)reg, sys_reg);
-	for (ch = 0; ch < ch_num; ch++) {
-		rank = 1 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_RANK_SHIFT(ch) &
-			SYS_REG_RANK_MASK);
-		col = 9 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_COL_SHIFT(ch) & SYS_REG_COL_MASK);
-		bk = 3 - ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_BK_SHIFT(ch)) & SYS_REG_BK_MASK);
-		cs0_row = 13 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_CS0_ROW_SHIFT(ch) &
-				SYS_REG_CS0_ROW_MASK);
-		cs1_row = 13 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_CS1_ROW_SHIFT(ch) &
-				SYS_REG_CS1_ROW_MASK);
-		bw = (2 >> ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_BW_SHIFT(ch)) &
-			SYS_REG_BW_MASK));
-		row_3_4 = sys_reg >> SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_SHIFT(ch) &
-			SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
+		u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
+		u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
+			       & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
 
-		chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20));
+		debug("%s %x %x\n", __func__, (u32)reg, sys_reg);
+		for (ch = 0; ch < ch_num; ch++) {
+			rank = 1 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_RANK_SHIFT(ch) &
+				SYS_REG_RANK_MASK);
+			col = 9 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_COL_SHIFT(ch) & SYS_REG_COL_MASK);
+			bk = 3 - ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_BK_SHIFT(ch)) & SYS_REG_BK_MASK);
+			cs0_row = 13 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_CS0_ROW_SHIFT(ch) &
+					SYS_REG_CS0_ROW_MASK);
+			cs1_row = 13 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_CS1_ROW_SHIFT(ch) &
+					SYS_REG_CS1_ROW_MASK);
+			bw = (2 >> ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_BW_SHIFT(ch)) &
+				SYS_REG_BW_MASK));
+			row_3_4 = sys_reg >> SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_SHIFT(ch) &
+				SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
 
-		if (rank > 1)
-			chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row);
-		if (row_3_4)
-			chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4;
-		size_mb += chipsize_mb;
-		debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n",
-		      rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4);
+			chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20));
+
+			if (rank > 1)
+				chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row);
+			if (row_3_4)
+				chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4;

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 60

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +10 -0
+			size_mb += chipsize_mb;
+			debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n",
+			      rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4);
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * we use the 0x00000000~0xfeffffff space
+		 * since 0xff000000~0xffffffff is soc register space
+		 * so we reserve it 
+		 */

That’s not true for all Rockchip SoCs. On the RK3399 for example the upper limit is 0xf8000000. Even on the RK3288 DRAM address range is actually
0x00000000-0xfe00000

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 62

Quoted 2 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +1 -0
+		size_mb = min(size_mb, 0xff000000/SZ_1M);
 	}

Should be 0xfe000000 (4G-32MB) for RK3288.
But there is already a define for that, SDRAM_MAX_SIZE is defined in rkxxx_common.h. Using that one would help to avoid possible breakage of other Rockchip SoCs.

Quoted 3 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +0 -0
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;
Signature · 1 line
2.17.0

Regards,
Klaus

#12 lore raw

PATCH 3/3 rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

Quoted 15 lines · klaus.goger at theobroma-systems.com

CC Philipp and Simon due maintainership (you may want to use get_maintainer.pl in the future) and Kever as the original author of the file.

Quoted 12 lines · Marty E. Plummer

Taken from coreboot's src/soc/rockchip/rk3288/sdram.c

Without this change, my u-boot build for the asus c201 chromebook (4GiB) is incorrectly detected as 0 Bytes of ram.

---
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++-----------

1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
Quoted 14 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c line 14

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +2 -0
index 76dbdc8715..a9c9f970a4 100644
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/arch/sdram_common.h>
 #include <dm/uclass-internal.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>

Is adding these headers really necessary?
common.h already includes kernel.h and sizes.h (with some redirections of config.h)

If it it does get that in eventually, I suppose its not required. I didn't know that chain of inclusion existed, so I grabbed what I needed.

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +0 -0
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
@@ -19,34 +21,44 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 	size_t size_mb = 0;
 	u32 ch;
 
Quoted 9 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 24

Quoted 4 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +1 -3
-	u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
-	u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
-		       & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
+	if (!size_mb) {

Is this really required? I don't see a way that size_mb will already be set at this point. But it blows up your diff that it takes quite a while to see that your only real change is the size_mb = min(...) part at the end.

It may be unneeded. I just knew that ram init worked on coreboot and not on u-boot, and the only difference between the codepaths on both was the if and min()

Quoted 62 lines
Quoted 47 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +23 -22
-	debug("%s %x %x\n", __func__, (u32)reg, sys_reg);
-	for (ch = 0; ch < ch_num; ch++) {
-		rank = 1 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_RANK_SHIFT(ch) &
-			SYS_REG_RANK_MASK);
-		col = 9 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_COL_SHIFT(ch) & SYS_REG_COL_MASK);
-		bk = 3 - ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_BK_SHIFT(ch)) & SYS_REG_BK_MASK);
-		cs0_row = 13 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_CS0_ROW_SHIFT(ch) &
-				SYS_REG_CS0_ROW_MASK);
-		cs1_row = 13 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_CS1_ROW_SHIFT(ch) &
-				SYS_REG_CS1_ROW_MASK);
-		bw = (2 >> ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_BW_SHIFT(ch)) &
-			SYS_REG_BW_MASK));
-		row_3_4 = sys_reg >> SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_SHIFT(ch) &
-			SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
+		u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
+		u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
+			       & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
 
-		chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20));
+		debug("%s %x %x\n", __func__, (u32)reg, sys_reg);
+		for (ch = 0; ch < ch_num; ch++) {
+			rank = 1 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_RANK_SHIFT(ch) &
+				SYS_REG_RANK_MASK);
+			col = 9 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_COL_SHIFT(ch) & SYS_REG_COL_MASK);
+			bk = 3 - ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_BK_SHIFT(ch)) & SYS_REG_BK_MASK);
+			cs0_row = 13 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_CS0_ROW_SHIFT(ch) &
+					SYS_REG_CS0_ROW_MASK);
+			cs1_row = 13 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_CS1_ROW_SHIFT(ch) &
+					SYS_REG_CS1_ROW_MASK);
+			bw = (2 >> ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_BW_SHIFT(ch)) &
+				SYS_REG_BW_MASK));
+			row_3_4 = sys_reg >> SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_SHIFT(ch) &
+				SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
 
-		if (rank > 1)
-			chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row);
-		if (row_3_4)
-			chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4;
-		size_mb += chipsize_mb;
-		debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n",
-		      rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4);
+			chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20));
+
+			if (rank > 1)
+				chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row);
+			if (row_3_4)
+				chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4;

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 60

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +10 -0
+			size_mb += chipsize_mb;
+			debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n",
+			      rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4);
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * we use the 0x00000000~0xfeffffff space
+		 * since 0xff000000~0xffffffff is soc register space
+		 * so we reserve it 
+		 */

That's not true for all Rockchip SoCs. On the RK3399 for example the upper limit is 0xf8000000. Even on the RK3288 DRAM address range is actually
0x00000000-0xfe00000

Quoted 8 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 62

Quoted 2 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +1 -0
+		size_mb = min(size_mb, 0xff000000/SZ_1M);
 	}

Should be 0xfe000000 (4G-32MB) for RK3288.
But there is already a define for that, SDRAM_MAX_SIZE is defined in rkxxx_common.h. Using that one would help to avoid possible breakage of other Rockchip SoCs.

Oh, does that get #defined properly for each SoC? if so, I'll sub that in for better compat.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +0 -0
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;
Signature · 1 line
2.17.0

Regards,
Klaus

#13 lore raw

PATCH 3/3 rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

Quoted 19 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 11 lines · klaus.goger at theobroma-systems.com

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 60

Quoted 5 lines · Marty E. Plummer
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +4 -0
+		 * we use the 0x00000000~0xfeffffff space
+		 * since 0xff000000~0xffffffff is soc register space
+		 * so we reserve it 
+		 */

That's not true for all Rockchip SoCs. On the RK3399 for example the upper limit is 0xf8000000. Even on the RK3288 DRAM address range is actually
0x00000000-0xfe00000

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +1 -0
+		size_mb = min(size_mb, 0xff000000/SZ_1M);
	}

Should be 0xfe000000 (4G-32MB) for RK3288.
But there is already a define for that, SDRAM_MAX_SIZE is defined in rkxxx_common.h. Using that one would help to avoid possible breakage of other Rockchip SoCs.

Quoted 2 lines

Oh, does that get #defined properly for each SoC? if so, I'll sub that in for better compat.

In fact, could you or someone else help me to understand the #include chain here? I'm not certain as to what that is available in each header mentioned can be used in this file to get max compat across the rockchip lineup, and I don't want to break someone elses board/etc with something that 'works for me'.

#14 lore raw

PATCH 3/3 rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

Quoted 23 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 19 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 19 lines · klaus.goger at theobroma-systems.com

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 60

Quoted 5 lines · Marty E. Plummer
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +4 -0
+		 * we use the 0x00000000~0xfeffffff space
+		 * since 0xff000000~0xffffffff is soc register space
+		 * so we reserve it 
+		 */

That's not true for all Rockchip SoCs. On the RK3399 for example the upper limit is 0xf8000000. Even on the RK3288 DRAM address range is actually 0x00000000-0xfe00000

Quoted 2 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +1 -0
+		size_mb = min(size_mb, 0xff000000/SZ_1M);
	}

Should be 0xfe000000 (4G-32MB) for RK3288.
But there is already a define for that, SDRAM_MAX_SIZE is defined in rkxxx_common.h. Using that one would help to avoid possible breakage of other Rockchip SoCs.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Oh, does that get #defined properly for each SoC? if so, I'll sub that in for better compat.

In fact, could you or someone else help me to understand the #include chain here? I'm not certain as to what that is available in each header mentioned can be used in this file to get max compat across the rockchip lineup, and I don't want to break someone elses board/etc with something that 'works for me’.

You can get a full list of included headers by adding the -H file to the gcc command line. make V=1 will help you to see how it’s called on your system.

In that particular case the relevant include chain is:
. include/common.h
.. include/config.h
... include/configs/popmetal_rk3288.h
.... include/configs/rk3288_common.h

So the correct rk3xxx_common.h will be selected by config.h and SDRAM_MAX_SIZE is defined in all of them.

#15 lore raw

PATCH 3/3 rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

Quoted 34 lines · klaus.goger at theobroma-systems.com
Quoted 23 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 19 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 19 lines · klaus.goger at theobroma-systems.com

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 60

Quoted 5 lines · Marty E. Plummer
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +4 -0
+		 * we use the 0x00000000~0xfeffffff space
+		 * since 0xff000000~0xffffffff is soc register space
+		 * so we reserve it 
+		 */

That's not true for all Rockchip SoCs. On the RK3399 for example the upper limit is 0xf8000000. Even on the RK3288 DRAM address range is actually 0x00000000-0xfe00000

Quoted 2 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +1 -0
+		size_mb = min(size_mb, 0xff000000/SZ_1M);
	}

Should be 0xfe000000 (4G-32MB) for RK3288.
But there is already a define for that, SDRAM_MAX_SIZE is defined in rkxxx_common.h. Using that one would help to avoid possible breakage of other Rockchip SoCs.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Oh, does that get #defined properly for each SoC? if so, I'll sub that in for better compat.

In fact, could you or someone else help me to understand the #include chain here? I'm not certain as to what that is available in each header mentioned can be used in this file to get max compat across the rockchip lineup, and I don't want to break someone elses board/etc with something that 'works for me'.

You can get a full list of included headers by adding the -H file to the gcc command line. make V=1 will help you to see how it's called on your system.

Quoted 9 lines

In that particular case the relevant include chain is:
. include/common.h
.. include/config.h
... include/configs/popmetal_rk3288.h
.... include/configs/rk3288_common.h

So the correct rk3xxx_common.h will be selected by config.h and SDRAM_MAX_SIZE is defined in all of them.

Ah, so 's:0xff000000:SDRAM_MAX_SIZE:' in that spot and it should be golden for all the rockchip stuffs. I'll try that, then try without the if (!size_mb) guard as well. Should it still work after that, I'll resubmit that patch. Probably with patman, if I can grok how to use it.

Aside from these issues, does the rest of the series look fine?

#16 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 3/3] rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

In reply to Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 7 lines · Marty E. Plummer

Taken from coreboot's src/soc/rockchip/rk3288/sdram.c

Without this change, my u-boot build for the asus c201 chromebook (4GiB) is incorrectly detected as 0 Bytes of ram.

Could you elaborate what the change is and what root-cause this addresses (4GB reporting as 0 sounds a bit like a 32bit type overflowing)?
It’s really hard to tell from the patch below (which seems to have everything simply reformatted to a different indentation)...

Quoted 20 lines

---
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++-----------

1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +2 -0
index 76dbdc8715..a9c9f970a4 100644
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/arch/sdram_common.h>
 #include <dm/uclass-internal.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 24

Quoted 7 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +1 -3
@@ -19,34 +21,44 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 	size_t size_mb = 0;
 	u32 ch;
 
-	u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
-	u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
-		       & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
+	if (!size_mb) {

Given that there’s a “size_mb = 0” just above it, this will always evaluate to true…

Quoted 69 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +34 -22
-	debug("%s %x %x\n", __func__, (u32)reg, sys_reg);
-	for (ch = 0; ch < ch_num; ch++) {
-		rank = 1 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_RANK_SHIFT(ch) &
-			SYS_REG_RANK_MASK);
-		col = 9 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_COL_SHIFT(ch) & SYS_REG_COL_MASK);
-		bk = 3 - ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_BK_SHIFT(ch)) & SYS_REG_BK_MASK);
-		cs0_row = 13 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_CS0_ROW_SHIFT(ch) &
-				SYS_REG_CS0_ROW_MASK);
-		cs1_row = 13 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_CS1_ROW_SHIFT(ch) &
-				SYS_REG_CS1_ROW_MASK);
-		bw = (2 >> ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_BW_SHIFT(ch)) &
-			SYS_REG_BW_MASK));
-		row_3_4 = sys_reg >> SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_SHIFT(ch) &
-			SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
+		u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
+		u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
+			       & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
 
-		chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20));
+		debug("%s %x %x\n", __func__, (u32)reg, sys_reg);
+		for (ch = 0; ch < ch_num; ch++) {
+			rank = 1 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_RANK_SHIFT(ch) &
+				SYS_REG_RANK_MASK);
+			col = 9 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_COL_SHIFT(ch) & SYS_REG_COL_MASK);
+			bk = 3 - ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_BK_SHIFT(ch)) & SYS_REG_BK_MASK);
+			cs0_row = 13 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_CS0_ROW_SHIFT(ch) &
+					SYS_REG_CS0_ROW_MASK);
+			cs1_row = 13 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_CS1_ROW_SHIFT(ch) &
+					SYS_REG_CS1_ROW_MASK);
+			bw = (2 >> ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_BW_SHIFT(ch)) &
+				SYS_REG_BW_MASK));
+			row_3_4 = sys_reg >> SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_SHIFT(ch) &
+				SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
 
-		if (rank > 1)
-			chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row);
-		if (row_3_4)
-			chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4;
-		size_mb += chipsize_mb;
-		debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n",
-		      rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4);
+			chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20));
+
+			if (rank > 1)
+				chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row);
+			if (row_3_4)
+				chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4;
+			size_mb += chipsize_mb;
+			debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n",
+			      rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4);
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * we use the 0x00000000~0xfeffffff space
+		 * since 0xff000000~0xffffffff is soc register space
+		 * so we reserve it
+		 */
+		size_mb = min(size_mb, 0xff000000/SZ_1M);
 	}
 
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;
Signature · 6 lines
2.17.0

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

#17 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 3/3] rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

Quoted 5 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich
Quoted 5 lines · Marty E. Plummer

Taken from coreboot's src/soc/rockchip/rk3288/sdram.c

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Without this change, my u-boot build for the asus c201 chromebook (4GiB) is incorrectly detected as 0 Bytes of ram.

Could you elaborate what the change is and what root-cause this addresses (4GB reporting as 0 sounds a bit like a 32bit type overflowing)?
It's really hard to tell from the patch below (which seems to have everything simply reformatted to a different indentation)...

if (!size_mb) {} wrapping, plus the min code near the end. However, actual testing on hardware shows this if guard to be unneeded, so I'll be dropping it. I was just taking what was different from coreboot's implementation (which I knew to work), but not all was needed it seems.

Quoted 23 lines
Quoted 23 lines

---
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++-----------

1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +2 -0
index 76dbdc8715..a9c9f970a4 100644
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/arch/sdram_common.h>
 #include <dm/uclass-internal.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
@@ -19,34 +21,44 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 	size_t size_mb = 0;
 	u32 ch;
 
Quoted 8 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 24

Quoted 4 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +1 -3
-	u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
-	u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
-		       & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
+	if (!size_mb) {

Given that there's a "size_mb = 0" just above it, this will always evaluate to true...

Very true, next patch revision will do away with this if guard, as its unneeded according to hardware retesting.

Quoted 61 lines
Quoted 61 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +34 -22
-	debug("%s %x %x\n", __func__, (u32)reg, sys_reg);
-	for (ch = 0; ch < ch_num; ch++) {
-		rank = 1 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_RANK_SHIFT(ch) &
-			SYS_REG_RANK_MASK);
-		col = 9 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_COL_SHIFT(ch) & SYS_REG_COL_MASK);
-		bk = 3 - ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_BK_SHIFT(ch)) & SYS_REG_BK_MASK);
-		cs0_row = 13 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_CS0_ROW_SHIFT(ch) &
-				SYS_REG_CS0_ROW_MASK);
-		cs1_row = 13 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_CS1_ROW_SHIFT(ch) &
-				SYS_REG_CS1_ROW_MASK);
-		bw = (2 >> ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_BW_SHIFT(ch)) &
-			SYS_REG_BW_MASK));
-		row_3_4 = sys_reg >> SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_SHIFT(ch) &
-			SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
+		u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
+		u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
+			       & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
 
-		chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20));
+		debug("%s %x %x\n", __func__, (u32)reg, sys_reg);
+		for (ch = 0; ch < ch_num; ch++) {
+			rank = 1 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_RANK_SHIFT(ch) &
+				SYS_REG_RANK_MASK);
+			col = 9 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_COL_SHIFT(ch) & SYS_REG_COL_MASK);
+			bk = 3 - ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_BK_SHIFT(ch)) & SYS_REG_BK_MASK);
+			cs0_row = 13 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_CS0_ROW_SHIFT(ch) &
+					SYS_REG_CS0_ROW_MASK);
+			cs1_row = 13 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_CS1_ROW_SHIFT(ch) &
+					SYS_REG_CS1_ROW_MASK);
+			bw = (2 >> ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_BW_SHIFT(ch)) &
+				SYS_REG_BW_MASK));
+			row_3_4 = sys_reg >> SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_SHIFT(ch) &
+				SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
 
-		if (rank > 1)
-			chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row);
-		if (row_3_4)
-			chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4;
-		size_mb += chipsize_mb;
-		debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n",
-		      rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4);
+			chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20));
+
+			if (rank > 1)
+				chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row);
+			if (row_3_4)
+				chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4;
+			size_mb += chipsize_mb;
+			debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n",
+			      rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4);
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * we use the 0x00000000~0xfeffffff space
+		 * since 0xff000000~0xffffffff is soc register space
+		 * so we reserve it
+		 */
+		size_mb = min(size_mb, 0xff000000/SZ_1M);
 	}
 
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +0 -0
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;
Signature · 6 lines
2.17.0

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

#18 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 3/3] rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

In reply to Marty E. Plummer

Hi Marty,

Quoted 4 lines · Marty E. Plummer

Taken from coreboot's src/soc/rockchip/rk3288/sdram.c

Without this change, my u-boot build for the asus c201 chromebook (4GiB) is incorrectly detected as 0 Bytes of ram.

I know the root cause for this issue, and I have a local patch for it. The rk3288 is 32bit, and 4GB size is just out of range, so we need to before the max size before return with '<<20'. Sorry for forgot to send it out.

Quoted 20 lines
---
 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +2 -0
index 76dbdc8715..a9c9f970a4 100644
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/arch/sdram_common.h>
 #include <dm/uclass-internal.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 24

Quoted 7 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +1 -3
@@ -19,34 +21,44 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 	size_t size_mb = 0;
 	u32 ch;
 
-	u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
-	u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
-		       & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
+	if (!size_mb) {

I don't understand this and follow up changes, we don't really need it, isn't it?

Quoted 43 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +18 -22
-	debug("%s %x %x\n", __func__, (u32)reg, sys_reg);
-	for (ch = 0; ch < ch_num; ch++) {
-		rank = 1 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_RANK_SHIFT(ch) &
-			SYS_REG_RANK_MASK);
-		col = 9 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_COL_SHIFT(ch) & SYS_REG_COL_MASK);
-		bk = 3 - ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_BK_SHIFT(ch)) & SYS_REG_BK_MASK);
-		cs0_row = 13 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_CS0_ROW_SHIFT(ch) &
-				SYS_REG_CS0_ROW_MASK);
-		cs1_row = 13 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_CS1_ROW_SHIFT(ch) &
-				SYS_REG_CS1_ROW_MASK);
-		bw = (2 >> ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_BW_SHIFT(ch)) &
-			SYS_REG_BW_MASK));
-		row_3_4 = sys_reg >> SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_SHIFT(ch) &
-			SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
+		u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
+		u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
+			       & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
 
-		chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20));
+		debug("%s %x %x\n", __func__, (u32)reg, sys_reg);
+		for (ch = 0; ch < ch_num; ch++) {
+			rank = 1 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_RANK_SHIFT(ch) &
+				SYS_REG_RANK_MASK);
+			col = 9 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_COL_SHIFT(ch) & SYS_REG_COL_MASK);
+			bk = 3 - ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_BK_SHIFT(ch)) & SYS_REG_BK_MASK);
+			cs0_row = 13 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_CS0_ROW_SHIFT(ch) &
+					SYS_REG_CS0_ROW_MASK);
+			cs1_row = 13 + (sys_reg >> SYS_REG_CS1_ROW_SHIFT(ch) &
+					SYS_REG_CS1_ROW_MASK);
+			bw = (2 >> ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_BW_SHIFT(ch)) &
+				SYS_REG_BW_MASK));
+			row_3_4 = sys_reg >> SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_SHIFT(ch) &
+				SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
 
-		if (rank > 1)
-			chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row);
-		if (row_3_4)
-			chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4;
-		size_mb += chipsize_mb;
-		debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n",
-		      rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4);
+			chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20));

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 55

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +10 -0
+
+			if (rank > 1)
+				chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row);
+			if (row_3_4)
+				chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4;
+			size_mb += chipsize_mb;
+			debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n",
+			      rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4);
+		}
+

I think don't need the changes before here.

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 61

Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +6 -0
+		/*
+		 * we use the 0x00000000~0xfeffffff space
+		 * since 0xff000000~0xffffffff is soc register space
+		 * so we reserve it
+		 */
+		size_mb = min(size_mb, 0xff000000/SZ_1M);

This is what we really need, as Klaus point out, we need to use SDRAM_MAX_SIZE
instead of hard code.

Thanks,
- Kever

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 64

Quoted 3 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +0 -0
 	}
 
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

#19 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 3/3] rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

Quoted 36 lines · Kever Yang

Hi Marty,

Quoted 4 lines · Marty E. Plummer

Taken from coreboot's src/soc/rockchip/rk3288/sdram.c

Without this change, my u-boot build for the asus c201 chromebook (4GiB) is incorrectly detected as 0 Bytes of ram.

I know the root cause for this issue, and I have a local patch for it. The rk3288 is 32bit, and 4GB size is just out of range, so we need to before the max size before return with '<<20'. Sorry for forgot to send it out.

Quoted 23 lines
---
 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +2 -0
index 76dbdc8715..a9c9f970a4 100644
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/arch/sdram_common.h>
 #include <dm/uclass-internal.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
@@ -19,34 +21,44 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 	size_t size_mb = 0;
 	u32 ch;
 
Quoted 8 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 24

Quoted 4 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +1 -3
-	u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
-	u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
-		       & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
+	if (!size_mb) {

I don't understand this and follow up changes, we don't really need it, isn't it?
I think don't need the changes before here.

Yeah, that was just another level of indentation for the if (!size_mb) guard, but I've reworked the patch to not do that as it was pointed out that since size_mb is initialized to 0 prior.

Quoted 10 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 61

Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +6 -0
+		/*
+		 * we use the 0x00000000~0xfeffffff space
+		 * since 0xff000000~0xffffffff is soc register space
+		 * so we reserve it
+		 */
+		size_mb = min(size_mb, 0xff000000/SZ_1M);

This is what we really need, as Klaus point out, we need to use SDRAM_MAX_SIZE
instead of hard code.

Yeah, I've got a rework on that which uses SDRAM_MAX_SIZE as instructed, build and boot tested on my hardware.

Quoted 8 lines

Thanks,
- Kever

Quoted 3 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +0 -0
 	}
 
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

#20 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 3/3] rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

Quoted 61 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 36 lines · Kever Yang

Hi Marty,

Quoted 4 lines · Marty E. Plummer

Taken from coreboot's src/soc/rockchip/rk3288/sdram.c

Without this change, my u-boot build for the asus c201 chromebook (4GiB) is incorrectly detected as 0 Bytes of ram.

I know the root cause for this issue, and I have a local patch for it. The rk3288 is 32bit, and 4GB size is just out of range, so we need to before the max size before return with '<<20'. Sorry for forgot to send it out.

Quoted 23 lines

---
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++-----------

1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +2 -0
index 76dbdc8715..a9c9f970a4 100644
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/arch/sdram_common.h>
 #include <dm/uclass-internal.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
@@ -19,34 +21,44 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 	size_t size_mb = 0;
 	u32 ch;
 
Quoted 8 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 24

Quoted 4 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +1 -3
-	u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
-	u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
-		       & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
+	if (!size_mb) {

I don't understand this and follow up changes, we don't really need it, isn't it?
I think don't need the changes before here.

Yeah, that was just another level of indentation for the if (!size_mb) guard, but I've reworked the patch to not do that as it was pointed out that since size_mb is initialized to 0 prior.

Quoted 10 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 61

Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +6 -0
+		/*
+		 * we use the 0x00000000~0xfeffffff space
+		 * since 0xff000000~0xffffffff is soc register space
+		 * so we reserve it
+		 */
+		size_mb = min(size_mb, 0xff000000/SZ_1M);

This is what we really need, as Klaus point out, we need to use SDRAM_MAX_SIZE
instead of hard code.

Quoted 2 lines

Yeah, I've got a rework on that which uses SDRAM_MAX_SIZE as instructed, build and boot tested on my hardware.

In that case you just masked the problem but didn’t solve it: assuming size_mb is size_t (I’ll assume this is 64bit, but did not check), then your 4GB is 0x1_0000_0000 ) which overflows to 0x0 when converted to a u32.

In other words: we need to figure out where the truncation occurs (image what happens if a new 32bit processor with LPAE comes out…).

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines

Thanks,
- Kever

Quoted 2 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +0 -0
 	}
 
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 64

Quoted 1 line
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +0 -0
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot <https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot>

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 791299C0-EEC0-4DB1-97C4-A8DAD3B1A481-SN7IsUiht6C/[email protected]

#22 lore raw

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

Quoted 64 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich
Quoted 61 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 36 lines · Kever Yang

Hi Marty,

Quoted 4 lines · Marty E. Plummer

Taken from coreboot's src/soc/rockchip/rk3288/sdram.c

Without this change, my u-boot build for the asus c201 chromebook (4GiB) is incorrectly detected as 0 Bytes of ram.

I know the root cause for this issue, and I have a local patch for it. The rk3288 is 32bit, and 4GB size is just out of range, so we need to before the max size before return with '<<20'. Sorry for forgot to send it out.

Quoted 23 lines

---
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++-----------

1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +2 -0
index 76dbdc8715..a9c9f970a4 100644
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/arch/sdram_common.h>
 #include <dm/uclass-internal.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
@@ -19,34 +21,44 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 	size_t size_mb = 0;
 	u32 ch;
 
Quoted 8 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 24

Quoted 4 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +1 -3
-	u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
-	u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
-		       & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
+	if (!size_mb) {

I don't understand this and follow up changes, we don't really need it, isn't it?
I think don't need the changes before here.

Yeah, that was just another level of indentation for the if (!size_mb) guard, but I've reworked the patch to not do that as it was pointed out that since size_mb is initialized to 0 prior.

Quoted 10 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 30

Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +6 -0
+		/*
+		 * we use the 0x00000000~0xfeffffff space
+		 * since 0xff000000~0xffffffff is soc register space
+		 * so we reserve it
+		 */
+		size_mb = min(size_mb, 0xff000000/SZ_1M);

This is what we really need, as Klaus point out, we need to use SDRAM_MAX_SIZE
instead of hard code.

Quoted 2 lines

Yeah, I've got a rework on that which uses SDRAM_MAX_SIZE as instructed, build and boot tested on my hardware.

Quoted 7 lines

In that case you just masked the problem but didn???t solve it: assuming size_mb is size_t (I???ll assume this is 64bit, but did not check), then your 4GB is 0x1_0000_0000 ) which overflows to 0x0 when converted to a u32.

In other words: we need to figure out where the truncation occurs (image what happens if a new 32bit processor with LPAE comes out???).

A very valid point. With the following patch to sdram_common.c and sdram_rk3288.c applied I get the debug output that follows it:

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +4 -0
index 232a7fa655..0fe69bf558 100644
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
  * SPDX-License-Identifier:     GPL-2.0+
  */
 
+#define DEBUG 1
 #include <common.h>
 #include <dm.h>
 #include <ram.h>
@@ -39,16 +40,19 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 			SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
 
 		chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20));
+		debug("%s: %d: chipsize_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, chipsize_mb);
 
 		if (rank > 1)
 			chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row);
 		if (row_3_4)
 			chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4;
 		size_mb += chipsize_mb;
+		debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb);
 		debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n",
 		      rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4);
 	}
 
+	debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb);
 	size_mb = min(size_mb, SDRAM_MAX_SIZE/SZ_1M);
 
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;
drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3288.c +1 -0
index d99bf12476..9738eb088f 100644
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
  * Adapted from coreboot.
  */
 
+#define DEBUG 1
 #include <common.h>
 #include <clk.h>
 #include <dm.h>

---
U-Boot SPL 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500) Trying to boot from SPI

U-Boot 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500)

Model: Google Speedy
DRAM: rockchip_sdram_size ff73009c 3c50dc50
rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400
rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 800
rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0
rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400
rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 1000
rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0
rockchip_sdram_size: 54: size_mb 1000
SDRAM base=0, size=fe000000
4 GiB

MMC:   dwmmc@ff0c0000: 1, dwmmc@ff0d0000: 2, dwmmc@ff0f0000: 0
In:    cros-ec-keyb
Out:   vidconsole
Err:   vidconsole
Model: Google Speedy
rockchip_dnl_key_pressed: adc_channel_single_shot fail!
Net:   Net Initialization Skipped

No ethernet found.
Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0
I guess we need to change the size_t to something larger; unless I'm mistaken, that's a 32 bit value, right? and 0x100000000 is at least 40 bits, unless I'm missing the issue here somewhere. However, that would take a change to include/ram.h, and would impact far more than just rk3288/rockchip devices across the board, so I'm unsure how to proceed.

Use the min macro here for now, and begin work migrating the ram_info size member to a 64-bit container?

Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 8 lines

Thanks,
- Kever

Quoted 3 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +0 -0
 	}
 
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot <https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot>

#23 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 3/3] rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

Marty,

Quoted 146 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 64 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich
Quoted 61 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 36 lines · Kever Yang

Hi Marty,

Quoted 4 lines · Marty E. Plummer

Taken from coreboot's src/soc/rockchip/rk3288/sdram.c

Without this change, my u-boot build for the asus c201 chromebook (4GiB) is incorrectly detected as 0 Bytes of ram.

I know the root cause for this issue, and I have a local patch for it. The rk3288 is 32bit, and 4GB size is just out of range, so we need to before the max size before return with '<<20'. Sorry for forgot to send it out.

Quoted 23 lines

---
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++-----------

1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +2 -0
index 76dbdc8715..a9c9f970a4 100644
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/arch/sdram_common.h>
 #include <dm/uclass-internal.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
@@ -19,34 +21,44 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 	size_t size_mb = 0;
 	u32 ch;
 
Quoted 8 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 24

Quoted 4 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +1 -3
-	u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
-	u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
-		       & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
+	if (!size_mb) {

I don't understand this and follow up changes, we don't really need it, isn't it?
I think don't need the changes before here.

Yeah, that was just another level of indentation for the if (!size_mb) guard, but I've reworked the patch to not do that as it was pointed out that since size_mb is initialized to 0 prior.

Quoted 10 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 30

Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +6 -0
+		/*
+		 * we use the 0x00000000~0xfeffffff space
+		 * since 0xff000000~0xffffffff is soc register space
+		 * so we reserve it
+		 */
+		size_mb = min(size_mb, 0xff000000/SZ_1M);

This is what we really need, as Klaus point out, we need to use SDRAM_MAX_SIZE
instead of hard code.

Quoted 2 lines

Yeah, I've got a rework on that which uses SDRAM_MAX_SIZE as instructed, build and boot tested on my hardware.

Quoted 7 lines

In that case you just masked the problem but didn???t solve it: assuming size_mb is size_t (I???ll assume this is 64bit, but did not check), then your 4GB is 0x1_0000_0000 ) which overflows to 0x0 when converted to a u32.

In other words: we need to figure out where the truncation occurs (image what happens if a new 32bit processor with LPAE comes out???).

A very valid point. With the following patch to sdram_common.c and sdram_rk3288.c applied I get the debug output that follows it:

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +4 -0
index 232a7fa655..0fe69bf558 100644
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 * SPDX-License-Identifier:     GPL-2.0+
 */
 
+#define DEBUG 1
 #include <common.h>
 #include <dm.h>
 #include <ram.h>
@@ -39,16 +40,19 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 			SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
 
 		chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20));
+		debug("%s: %d: chipsize_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, chipsize_mb);
 
 		if (rank > 1)
 			chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row);
 		if (row_3_4)
 			chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4;
 		size_mb += chipsize_mb;
+		debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb);
 		debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n",
 		      rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4);
 	}
 
+	debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb);
 	size_mb = min(size_mb, SDRAM_MAX_SIZE/SZ_1M);
 
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;
drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3288.c +1 -1
index d99bf12476..9738eb088f 100644
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 * Adapted from coreboot.
 */
 
+#define DEBUG 1
 #include <common.h>
 #include <clk.h>
 #include <dm.h>
 
---

U-Boot SPL 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500) Trying to boot from SPI

U-Boot 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500)

Model: Google Speedy
DRAM: rockchip_sdram_size ff73009c 3c50dc50
rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400
rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 800
rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0
rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400
rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 1000
rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0
rockchip_sdram_size: 54: size_mb 1000
SDRAM base=0, size=fe000000
4 GiB

MMC:   dwmmc@ff0c0000: 1, dwmmc@ff0d0000: 2, dwmmc@ff0f0000: 0
In:    cros-ec-keyb
Out:   vidconsole
Err:   vidconsole
Model: Google Speedy
rockchip_dnl_key_pressed: adc_channel_single_shot fail!
Net:   Net Initialization Skipped
Quoted 4 lines

No ethernet found.
Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0
I guess we need to change the size_t to something larger; unless I'm mistaken, that's a 32 bit value, right? and 0x100000000 is at least 40

4GB is actually the 33rd bit set and the lower 32bits cleared (i.e. the largest 32bit value “plus one”).

Quoted 6 lines

bits, unless I'm missing the issue here somewhere. However, that would take a change to include/ram.h, and would impact far more than just rk3288/rockchip devices across the board, so I'm unsure how to proceed.

Use the min macro here for now, and begin work migrating the ram_info size member to a 64-bit container?

The min() doesn’t make any sense here, as we implement the hook function ‘board_get_usable_ram_top’ just a few lines later…
We are at the start of the merge window right now, so I’d rather hold off a week (or two) and have a permanent solution than merging just a band-aid now and then having the full fix come in later during the merge window.

I briefly reviewed the situation yesterday and it looks like the size field in ram_info is the culprit: it’s defined as ‘size_t’, which again is __SIZE_TYPE__ which again is ‘unsigned int’ on a (32bit) arm-*-eabi compiler.

Expanding this to a phys_size_t won’t be doing us much good, either (as that one will also be 32bits for the RK3288).

The root cause of this is really that the RAM size and the ‘usable RAM’ are two different concepts in U-Boot. On a 32bit physical address space with memory-mapped peripherals, we can never have the full 4GB of DRAM as we’ll also have some of the physical address-space set aside for the MMIO; however, the MMIO range is only removed from the DRAM size when the usable ram-top is evaluated… so the size can be 4GB after all and overflow the 32bit size_t. Note that this separation into two different steps makes a lot of sense, as processors might not use MMIO but specialised instructions to access peripheral space—in which case there might indeed be a usable memory of 4GB on a 32bit physical address space.

From what I can tell, we’ll need to do two things:
(a) fix arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c to not use 32bit types
for the memory size
(b) touch ram.h to change the type of the ‘size’ field in ram_info (it needs
to be larger than 32bits

I’d like Simon’s input (as he owns ram.h) and can create a patchset for this change, if he agrees that this is the way forward.

Regards,
Philipp.

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines

Thanks,
- Kever

Quoted 2 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +0 -0
 	}
 
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 58

Quoted 1 line
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +0 -0
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot <https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot>

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

#24 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 3/3] rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

Simon,

Looks like we’d like to have a 64bit type for size in ‘struct ram_info’ (see below). Let us know what you think of the proposed change.

Thanks,
Philipp.

Quoted 195 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich

Marty,

Quoted 146 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 64 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich
Quoted 61 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 36 lines · Kever Yang

Hi Marty,

Quoted 4 lines · Marty E. Plummer

Taken from coreboot's src/soc/rockchip/rk3288/sdram.c

Without this change, my u-boot build for the asus c201 chromebook (4GiB) is incorrectly detected as 0 Bytes of ram.

I know the root cause for this issue, and I have a local patch for it. The rk3288 is 32bit, and 4GB size is just out of range, so we need to before the max size before return with '<<20'. Sorry for forgot to send it out.

Quoted 23 lines

---
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++-----------

1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +2 -0
index 76dbdc8715..a9c9f970a4 100644
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/arch/sdram_common.h>
 #include <dm/uclass-internal.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
@@ -19,34 +21,44 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 	size_t size_mb = 0;
 	u32 ch;
 
Quoted 8 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 24

Quoted 4 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +1 -3
-	u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
-	u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
-		       & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
+	if (!size_mb) {

I don't understand this and follow up changes, we don't really need it, isn't it?
I think don't need the changes before here.

Yeah, that was just another level of indentation for the if (!size_mb) guard, but I've reworked the patch to not do that as it was pointed out that since size_mb is initialized to 0 prior.

Quoted 10 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 30

Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +6 -0
+		/*
+		 * we use the 0x00000000~0xfeffffff space
+		 * since 0xff000000~0xffffffff is soc register space
+		 * so we reserve it
+		 */
+		size_mb = min(size_mb, 0xff000000/SZ_1M);

This is what we really need, as Klaus point out, we need to use SDRAM_MAX_SIZE
instead of hard code.

Quoted 2 lines

Yeah, I've got a rework on that which uses SDRAM_MAX_SIZE as instructed, build and boot tested on my hardware.

Quoted 7 lines

In that case you just masked the problem but didn???t solve it: assuming size_mb is size_t (I???ll assume this is 64bit, but did not check), then your 4GB is 0x1_0000_0000 ) which overflows to 0x0 when converted to a u32.

In other words: we need to figure out where the truncation occurs (image what happens if a new 32bit processor with LPAE comes out???).

A very valid point. With the following patch to sdram_common.c and sdram_rk3288.c applied I get the debug output that follows it:

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +4 -0
index 232a7fa655..0fe69bf558 100644
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 * SPDX-License-Identifier:     GPL-2.0+
 */
 
+#define DEBUG 1
 #include <common.h>
 #include <dm.h>
 #include <ram.h>
@@ -39,16 +40,19 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 			SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
 
 		chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20));
+		debug("%s: %d: chipsize_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, chipsize_mb);
 
 		if (rank > 1)
 			chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row);
 		if (row_3_4)
 			chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4;
 		size_mb += chipsize_mb;
+		debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb);
 		debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n",
 		      rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4);
 	}
 
+	debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb);
 	size_mb = min(size_mb, SDRAM_MAX_SIZE/SZ_1M);
 
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;
drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3288.c +1 -1
index d99bf12476..9738eb088f 100644
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 * Adapted from coreboot.
 */
 
+#define DEBUG 1
 #include <common.h>
 #include <clk.h>
 #include <dm.h>
 
---

U-Boot SPL 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500) Trying to boot from SPI

U-Boot 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500)

Model: Google Speedy
DRAM: rockchip_sdram_size ff73009c 3c50dc50
rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400
rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 800
rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0
rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400
rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 1000
rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0
rockchip_sdram_size: 54: size_mb 1000
SDRAM base=0, size=fe000000
4 GiB

MMC:   dwmmc@ff0c0000: 1, dwmmc@ff0d0000: 2, dwmmc@ff0f0000: 0
In:    cros-ec-keyb
Out:   vidconsole
Err:   vidconsole
Model: Google Speedy
rockchip_dnl_key_pressed: adc_channel_single_shot fail!
Net:   Net Initialization Skipped
Quoted 4 lines

No ethernet found.
Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0
I guess we need to change the size_t to something larger; unless I'm mistaken, that's a 32 bit value, right? and 0x100000000 is at least 40

4GB is actually the 33rd bit set and the lower 32bits cleared (i.e. the largest 32bit value “plus one”).

Quoted 6 lines

bits, unless I'm missing the issue here somewhere. However, that would take a change to include/ram.h, and would impact far more than just rk3288/rockchip devices across the board, so I'm unsure how to proceed.

Use the min macro here for now, and begin work migrating the ram_info size member to a 64-bit container?

The min() doesn’t make any sense here, as we implement the hook function ‘board_get_usable_ram_top’ just a few lines later…
We are at the start of the merge window right now, so I’d rather hold off a week (or two) and have a permanent solution than merging just a band-aid now and then having the full fix come in later during the merge window.

I briefly reviewed the situation yesterday and it looks like the size field in ram_info is the culprit: it’s defined as ‘size_t’, which again is __SIZE_TYPE__ which again is ‘unsigned int’ on a (32bit) arm-*-eabi compiler.

Expanding this to a phys_size_t won’t be doing us much good, either (as that one will also be 32bits for the RK3288).

The root cause of this is really that the RAM size and the ‘usable RAM’ are two different concepts in U-Boot. On a 32bit physical address space with memory-mapped peripherals, we can never have the full 4GB of DRAM as we’ll also have some of the physical address-space set aside for the MMIO; however, the MMIO range is only removed from the DRAM size when the usable ram-top is evaluated… so the size can be 4GB after all and overflow the 32bit size_t. Note that this separation into two different steps makes a lot of sense, as processors might not use MMIO but specialised instructions to access peripheral space—in which case there might indeed be a usable memory of 4GB on a 32bit physical address space.

From what I can tell, we’ll need to do two things:
(a) fix arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c to not use 32bit types
for the memory size
(b) touch ram.h to change the type of the ‘size’ field in ram_info (it needs
to be larger than 32bits

Quoted 18 lines

I’d like Simon’s input (as he owns ram.h) and can create a patchset for this change, if he agrees that this is the way forward.

Regards,
Philipp.

Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 8 lines

Thanks,
- Kever

Quoted 3 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +0 -0
 	}
 
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot <https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot> <https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot <https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot>>

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

#25 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 3/3] rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

In reply to Dr. Philipp Tomsich
Quoted 169 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich

Marty,

Quoted 146 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 64 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich
Quoted 61 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 36 lines · Kever Yang

Hi Marty,

Quoted 4 lines · Marty E. Plummer

Taken from coreboot's src/soc/rockchip/rk3288/sdram.c

Without this change, my u-boot build for the asus c201 chromebook (4GiB) is incorrectly detected as 0 Bytes of ram.

I know the root cause for this issue, and I have a local patch for it. The rk3288 is 32bit, and 4GB size is just out of range, so we need to before the max size before return with '<<20'. Sorry for forgot to send it out.

Quoted 23 lines

---
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++-----------

1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +2 -0
index 76dbdc8715..a9c9f970a4 100644
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/arch/sdram_common.h>
 #include <dm/uclass-internal.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
@@ -19,34 +21,44 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 	size_t size_mb = 0;
 	u32 ch;
 
Quoted 8 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 24

Quoted 4 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +1 -3
-	u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
-	u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
-		       & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
+	if (!size_mb) {

I don't understand this and follow up changes, we don't really need it, isn't it?
I think don't need the changes before here.

Yeah, that was just another level of indentation for the if (!size_mb) guard, but I've reworked the patch to not do that as it was pointed out that since size_mb is initialized to 0 prior.

Quoted 10 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 30

Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +6 -0
+		/*
+		 * we use the 0x00000000~0xfeffffff space
+		 * since 0xff000000~0xffffffff is soc register space
+		 * so we reserve it
+		 */
+		size_mb = min(size_mb, 0xff000000/SZ_1M);

This is what we really need, as Klaus point out, we need to use SDRAM_MAX_SIZE
instead of hard code.

Quoted 2 lines

Yeah, I've got a rework on that which uses SDRAM_MAX_SIZE as instructed, build and boot tested on my hardware.

Quoted 7 lines

In that case you just masked the problem but didn???t solve it: assuming size_mb is size_t (I???ll assume this is 64bit, but did not check), then your 4GB is 0x1_0000_0000 ) which overflows to 0x0 when converted to a u32.

In other words: we need to figure out where the truncation occurs (image what happens if a new 32bit processor with LPAE comes out???).

A very valid point. With the following patch to sdram_common.c and sdram_rk3288.c applied I get the debug output that follows it:

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +4 -0
index 232a7fa655..0fe69bf558 100644
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 * SPDX-License-Identifier:     GPL-2.0+
 */
 
+#define DEBUG 1
 #include <common.h>
 #include <dm.h>
 #include <ram.h>
@@ -39,16 +40,19 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 			SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
 
 		chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20));
+		debug("%s: %d: chipsize_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, chipsize_mb);
 
 		if (rank > 1)
 			chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row);
 		if (row_3_4)
 			chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4;
 		size_mb += chipsize_mb;
+		debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb);
 		debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n",
 		      rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4);
 	}
 
+	debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb);
 	size_mb = min(size_mb, SDRAM_MAX_SIZE/SZ_1M);
 
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;
drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3288.c +1 -1
index d99bf12476..9738eb088f 100644
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 * Adapted from coreboot.
 */
 
+#define DEBUG 1
 #include <common.h>
 #include <clk.h>
 #include <dm.h>
 
---

U-Boot SPL 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500) Trying to boot from SPI

U-Boot 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500)

Model: Google Speedy
DRAM: rockchip_sdram_size ff73009c 3c50dc50
rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400
rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 800
rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0
rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400
rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 1000
rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0
rockchip_sdram_size: 54: size_mb 1000
SDRAM base=0, size=fe000000
4 GiB

MMC:   dwmmc@ff0c0000: 1, dwmmc@ff0d0000: 2, dwmmc@ff0f0000: 0
In:    cros-ec-keyb
Out:   vidconsole
Err:   vidconsole
Model: Google Speedy
rockchip_dnl_key_pressed: adc_channel_single_shot fail!
Net:   Net Initialization Skipped
Quoted 4 lines

No ethernet found.
Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0
I guess we need to change the size_t to something larger; unless I'm mistaken, that's a 32 bit value, right? and 0x100000000 is at least 40

4GB is actually the 33rd bit set and the lower 32bits cleared (i.e. the largest 32bit value ???plus one???).

Quoted 6 lines

bits, unless I'm missing the issue here somewhere. However, that would take a change to include/ram.h, and would impact far more than just rk3288/rockchip devices across the board, so I'm unsure how to proceed.

Use the min macro here for now, and begin work migrating the ram_info size member to a 64-bit container?

The min() doesn???t make any sense here, as we implement the hook function ???board_get_usable_ram_top??? just a few lines later???
We are at the start of the merge window right now, so I???d rather hold off a week (or two) and have a permanent solution than merging just a band-aid now and then having the full fix come in later during the merge window.

Quoted 3 lines

I briefly reviewed the situation yesterday and it looks like the size field in ram_info is the culprit: it???s defined as ???size_t???, which again is __SIZE_TYPE__ which again is ???unsigned int??? on a (32bit) arm-*-eabi compiler.

Yeah, I was talking about this with Marek on irc yesterday, I had the same conclusion. However, being very new and inexperienced with u-boot development in general, I'm a bit averse to to messing with what appears to be a global header file, as it can easily break any other board which uses it.

Quoted 21 lines

Expanding this to a phys_size_t won???t be doing us much good, either (as that one will also be 32bits for the RK3288).

The root cause of this is really that the RAM size and the ???usable RAM??? are two different concepts in U-Boot. On a 32bit physical address space with memory-mapped peripherals, we can never have the full 4GB of DRAM as we???ll also have some of the physical address-space set aside for the MMIO; however, the MMIO range is only removed from the DRAM size when the usable ram-top is evaluated??? so the size can be 4GB after all and overflow the 32bit size_t. Note that this separation into two different steps makes a lot of sense, as processors might not use MMIO but specialised instructions to access peripheral space???in which case there might indeed be a usable memory of 4GB on a 32bit physical address space.

From what I can tell, we???ll need to do two things:
(a) fix arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c to not use 32bit types
for the memory size
(b) touch ram.h to change the type of the ???size??? field in ram_info (it needs
to be larger than 32bits

Quoted 19 lines

I???d like Simon???s input (as he owns ram.h) and can create a patchset for this change, if he agrees that this is the way forward.

Regards,
Philipp.

Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 8 lines

Thanks,
- Kever

Quoted 3 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +0 -0
 	}
 
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot <https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot>

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

#26 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 3/3] rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

Quoted 173 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 169 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich

Marty,

Quoted 146 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 64 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich
Quoted 61 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 36 lines · Kever Yang

Hi Marty,

Quoted 4 lines · Marty E. Plummer

Taken from coreboot's src/soc/rockchip/rk3288/sdram.c

Without this change, my u-boot build for the asus c201 chromebook (4GiB) is incorrectly detected as 0 Bytes of ram.

I know the root cause for this issue, and I have a local patch for it. The rk3288 is 32bit, and 4GB size is just out of range, so we need to before the max size before return with '<<20'. Sorry for forgot to send it out.

Quoted 23 lines

---
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++-----------

1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +2 -0
index 76dbdc8715..a9c9f970a4 100644
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/arch/sdram_common.h>
 #include <dm/uclass-internal.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
@@ -19,34 +21,44 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 	size_t size_mb = 0;
 	u32 ch;
 
Quoted 8 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 24

Quoted 4 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +1 -3
-	u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
-	u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
-		       & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
+	if (!size_mb) {

I don't understand this and follow up changes, we don't really need it, isn't it?
I think don't need the changes before here.

Yeah, that was just another level of indentation for the if (!size_mb) guard, but I've reworked the patch to not do that as it was pointed out that since size_mb is initialized to 0 prior.

Quoted 10 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 30

Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +6 -0
+		/*
+		 * we use the 0x00000000~0xfeffffff space
+		 * since 0xff000000~0xffffffff is soc register space
+		 * so we reserve it
+		 */
+		size_mb = min(size_mb, 0xff000000/SZ_1M);

This is what we really need, as Klaus point out, we need to use SDRAM_MAX_SIZE
instead of hard code.

Quoted 2 lines

Yeah, I've got a rework on that which uses SDRAM_MAX_SIZE as instructed, build and boot tested on my hardware.

Quoted 7 lines

In that case you just masked the problem but didn???t solve it: assuming size_mb is size_t (I???ll assume this is 64bit, but did not check), then your 4GB is 0x1_0000_0000 ) which overflows to 0x0 when converted to a u32.

In other words: we need to figure out where the truncation occurs (image what happens if a new 32bit processor with LPAE comes out???).

A very valid point. With the following patch to sdram_common.c and sdram_rk3288.c applied I get the debug output that follows it:

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +4 -0
index 232a7fa655..0fe69bf558 100644
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 * SPDX-License-Identifier:     GPL-2.0+
 */
 
+#define DEBUG 1
 #include <common.h>
 #include <dm.h>
 #include <ram.h>
@@ -39,16 +40,19 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 			SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
 
 		chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20));
+		debug("%s: %d: chipsize_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, chipsize_mb);
 
 		if (rank > 1)
 			chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row);
 		if (row_3_4)
 			chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4;
 		size_mb += chipsize_mb;
+		debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb);
 		debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n",
 		      rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4);
 	}
 
+	debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb);
 	size_mb = min(size_mb, SDRAM_MAX_SIZE/SZ_1M);
 
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;
drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3288.c +1 -1
index d99bf12476..9738eb088f 100644
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 * Adapted from coreboot.
 */
 
+#define DEBUG 1
 #include <common.h>
 #include <clk.h>
 #include <dm.h>
 
---

U-Boot SPL 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500) Trying to boot from SPI

U-Boot 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500)

Model: Google Speedy
DRAM: rockchip_sdram_size ff73009c 3c50dc50
rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400
rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 800
rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0
rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400
rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 1000
rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0
rockchip_sdram_size: 54: size_mb 1000
SDRAM base=0, size=fe000000
4 GiB

MMC:   dwmmc@ff0c0000: 1, dwmmc@ff0d0000: 2, dwmmc@ff0f0000: 0
In:    cros-ec-keyb
Out:   vidconsole
Err:   vidconsole
Model: Google Speedy
rockchip_dnl_key_pressed: adc_channel_single_shot fail!
Net:   Net Initialization Skipped
Quoted 4 lines

No ethernet found.
Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0
I guess we need to change the size_t to something larger; unless I'm mistaken, that's a 32 bit value, right? and 0x100000000 is at least 40

4GB is actually the 33rd bit set and the lower 32bits cleared (i.e. the largest 32bit value ???plus one???).

Quoted 6 lines

bits, unless I'm missing the issue here somewhere. However, that would take a change to include/ram.h, and would impact far more than just rk3288/rockchip devices across the board, so I'm unsure how to proceed.

Use the min macro here for now, and begin work migrating the ram_info size member to a 64-bit container?

The min() doesn???t make any sense here, as we implement the hook function ???board_get_usable_ram_top??? just a few lines later???
We are at the start of the merge window right now, so I???d rather hold off a week (or two) and have a permanent solution than merging just a band-aid now and then having the full fix come in later during the merge window.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines

I briefly reviewed the situation yesterday and it looks like the size field in ram_info is the culprit: it???s defined as ???size_t???, which again is __SIZE_TYPE__ which again is ???unsigned int??? on a (32bit) arm-*-eabi compiler.

Yeah, I was talking about this with Marek on irc yesterday, I had the same conclusion. However, being very new and inexperienced with u-boot development in general, I'm a bit averse to to messing with what appears to be a global header file, as it can easily break any other board which uses it.

No problem — let’s wait for Simon’s input and I’ll create the patchset. I’ll need your help testing, as I don’t have any 32bit platforms w/ 4GB… and I’ll let you know once something is ready for you to test.

Quoted 32 lines
Quoted 32 lines

Expanding this to a phys_size_t won???t be doing us much good, either (as that one will also be 32bits for the RK3288).

The root cause of this is really that the RAM size and the ???usable RAM??? are two different concepts in U-Boot. On a 32bit physical address space with memory-mapped peripherals, we can never have the full 4GB of DRAM as we???ll also have some of the physical address-space set aside for the MMIO; however, the MMIO range is only removed from the DRAM size when the usable ram-top is evaluated??? so the size can be 4GB after all and overflow the 32bit size_t. Note that this separation into two different steps makes a lot of sense, as processors might not use MMIO but specialised instructions to access peripheral space???in which case there might indeed be a usable memory of 4GB on a 32bit physical address space.

From what I can tell, we???ll need to do two things:
(a) fix arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c to not use 32bit types
for the memory size
(b) touch ram.h to change the type of the ???size??? field in ram_info (it needs
to be larger than 32bits

I???d like Simon???s input (as he owns ram.h) and can create a patchset for this change, if he agrees that this is the way forward.

Regards,
Philipp.

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines

Thanks,
- Kever

Quoted 2 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +0 -0
 	}
 
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 58

Quoted 1 line
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +0 -0
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot <https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot>

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): C5B7DFAE-C5CA-4D9E-B6CB-C44E9AD974E9-SN7IsUiht6C/[email protected]

#28 lore raw

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

Quoted 182 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich
Quoted 173 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 169 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich

Marty,

Quoted 146 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 64 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich
Quoted 61 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 36 lines · Kever Yang

Hi Marty,

Quoted 4 lines · Marty E. Plummer

Taken from coreboot's src/soc/rockchip/rk3288/sdram.c

Without this change, my u-boot build for the asus c201 chromebook (4GiB) is incorrectly detected as 0 Bytes of ram.

I know the root cause for this issue, and I have a local patch for it. The rk3288 is 32bit, and 4GB size is just out of range, so we need to before the max size before return with '<<20'. Sorry for forgot to send it out.

Quoted 23 lines

---
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++-----------

1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +2 -0
index 76dbdc8715..a9c9f970a4 100644
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/arch/sdram_common.h>
 #include <dm/uclass-internal.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
@@ -19,34 +21,44 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 	size_t size_mb = 0;
 	u32 ch;
 
Quoted 8 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 24

Quoted 4 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +1 -3
-	u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
-	u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
-		       & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
+	if (!size_mb) {

I don't understand this and follow up changes, we don't really need it, isn't it?
I think don't need the changes before here.

Yeah, that was just another level of indentation for the if (!size_mb) guard, but I've reworked the patch to not do that as it was pointed out that since size_mb is initialized to 0 prior.

Quoted 10 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 30

Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +6 -0
+		/*
+		 * we use the 0x00000000~0xfeffffff space
+		 * since 0xff000000~0xffffffff is soc register space
+		 * so we reserve it
+		 */
+		size_mb = min(size_mb, 0xff000000/SZ_1M);

This is what we really need, as Klaus point out, we need to use SDRAM_MAX_SIZE
instead of hard code.

Quoted 2 lines

Yeah, I've got a rework on that which uses SDRAM_MAX_SIZE as instructed, build and boot tested on my hardware.

Quoted 7 lines

In that case you just masked the problem but didn???t solve it: assuming size_mb is size_t (I???ll assume this is 64bit, but did not check), then your 4GB is 0x1_0000_0000 ) which overflows to 0x0 when converted to a u32.

In other words: we need to figure out where the truncation occurs (image what happens if a new 32bit processor with LPAE comes out???).

A very valid point. With the following patch to sdram_common.c and sdram_rk3288.c applied I get the debug output that follows it:

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +4 -0
index 232a7fa655..0fe69bf558 100644
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 * SPDX-License-Identifier:     GPL-2.0+
 */
 
+#define DEBUG 1
 #include <common.h>
 #include <dm.h>
 #include <ram.h>
@@ -39,16 +40,19 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 			SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
 
 		chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20));
+		debug("%s: %d: chipsize_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, chipsize_mb);
 
 		if (rank > 1)
 			chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row);
 		if (row_3_4)
 			chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4;
 		size_mb += chipsize_mb;
+		debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb);
 		debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n",
 		      rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4);
 	}
 
+	debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb);
 	size_mb = min(size_mb, SDRAM_MAX_SIZE/SZ_1M);
 
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;
drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3288.c +1 -1
index d99bf12476..9738eb088f 100644
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 * Adapted from coreboot.
 */
 
+#define DEBUG 1
 #include <common.h>
 #include <clk.h>
 #include <dm.h>
 
---

U-Boot SPL 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500) Trying to boot from SPI

U-Boot 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500)

Model: Google Speedy
DRAM: rockchip_sdram_size ff73009c 3c50dc50
rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400
rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 800
rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0
rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400
rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 1000
rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0
rockchip_sdram_size: 54: size_mb 1000
SDRAM base=0, size=fe000000
4 GiB

MMC:   dwmmc@ff0c0000: 1, dwmmc@ff0d0000: 2, dwmmc@ff0f0000: 0
In:    cros-ec-keyb
Out:   vidconsole
Err:   vidconsole
Model: Google Speedy
rockchip_dnl_key_pressed: adc_channel_single_shot fail!
Net:   Net Initialization Skipped
Quoted 4 lines

No ethernet found.
Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0
I guess we need to change the size_t to something larger; unless I'm mistaken, that's a 32 bit value, right? and 0x100000000 is at least 40

4GB is actually the 33rd bit set and the lower 32bits cleared (i.e. the largest 32bit value ???plus one???).

Quoted 6 lines

bits, unless I'm missing the issue here somewhere. However, that would take a change to include/ram.h, and would impact far more than just rk3288/rockchip devices across the board, so I'm unsure how to proceed.

Use the min macro here for now, and begin work migrating the ram_info size member to a 64-bit container?

The min() doesn???t make any sense here, as we implement the hook function ???board_get_usable_ram_top??? just a few lines later???
We are at the start of the merge window right now, so I???d rather hold off a week (or two) and have a permanent solution than merging just a band-aid now and then having the full fix come in later during the merge window.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines

I briefly reviewed the situation yesterday and it looks like the size field in ram_info is the culprit: it???s defined as ???size_t???, which again is __SIZE_TYPE__ which again is ???unsigned int??? on a (32bit) arm-*-eabi compiler.

Yeah, I was talking about this with Marek on irc yesterday, I had the same conclusion. However, being very new and inexperienced with u-boot development in general, I'm a bit averse to to messing with what appears to be a global header file, as it can easily break any other board which uses it.

Quoted 4 lines

No problem ??? let???s wait for Simon???s input and I???ll create the patchset. I???ll need your help testing, as I don???t have any 32bit platforms w/ 4GB??? and I???ll let you know once something is ready for you to test.

Even if we do change ram_info.size into a larger, 64-bit variable, we should still probably use that min call since with a 32-bit address space, even with 4GiB ram physically, the rk3288 can only address 0xff00000 of ram, which is just a tad shy of the full 4GiB.

Quoted 40 lines
Quoted 39 lines
Quoted 39 lines

Expanding this to a phys_size_t won???t be doing us much good, either (as that one will also be 32bits for the RK3288).

The root cause of this is really that the RAM size and the ???usable RAM??? are two different concepts in U-Boot. On a 32bit physical address space with memory-mapped peripherals, we can never have the full 4GB of DRAM as we???ll also have some of the physical address-space set aside for the MMIO; however, the MMIO range is only removed from the DRAM size when the usable ram-top is evaluated??? so the size can be 4GB after all and overflow the 32bit size_t. Note that this separation into two different steps makes a lot of sense, as processors might not use MMIO but specialised instructions to access peripheral space???in which case there might indeed be a usable memory of 4GB on a 32bit physical address space.

From what I can tell, we???ll need to do two things:
(a) fix arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c to not use 32bit types
for the memory size
(b) touch ram.h to change the type of the ???size??? field in ram_info (it needs
to be larger than 32bits

I???d like Simon???s input (as he owns ram.h) and can create a patchset for this change, if he agrees that this is the way forward.

Regards,
Philipp.

Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 8 lines

Thanks,
- Kever

Quoted 3 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +0 -0
 	}
 
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot <https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot>

#29 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 3/3] rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

Quoted 186 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 182 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich
Quoted 181 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 169 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich

Marty,

Quoted 146 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 64 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich
Quoted 61 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 36 lines · Kever Yang

Hi Marty,

Quoted 4 lines · Marty E. Plummer

Taken from coreboot's src/soc/rockchip/rk3288/sdram.c

Without this change, my u-boot build for the asus c201 chromebook (4GiB) is incorrectly detected as 0 Bytes of ram.

I know the root cause for this issue, and I have a local patch for it. The rk3288 is 32bit, and 4GB size is just out of range, so we need to before the max size before return with '<<20'. Sorry for forgot to send it out.

Quoted 23 lines

---
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++-----------

1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +2 -0
index 76dbdc8715..a9c9f970a4 100644
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/arch/sdram_common.h>
 #include <dm/uclass-internal.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
@@ -19,34 +21,44 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 	size_t size_mb = 0;
 	u32 ch;
 
Quoted 8 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 24

Quoted 4 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +1 -3
-	u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
-	u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
-		       & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
+	if (!size_mb) {

I don't understand this and follow up changes, we don't really need it, isn't it?
I think don't need the changes before here.

Yeah, that was just another level of indentation for the if (!size_mb) guard, but I've reworked the patch to not do that as it was pointed out that since size_mb is initialized to 0 prior.

Quoted 10 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 30

Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +6 -0
+		/*
+		 * we use the 0x00000000~0xfeffffff space
+		 * since 0xff000000~0xffffffff is soc register space
+		 * so we reserve it
+		 */
+		size_mb = min(size_mb, 0xff000000/SZ_1M);

This is what we really need, as Klaus point out, we need to use SDRAM_MAX_SIZE
instead of hard code.

Quoted 2 lines

Yeah, I've got a rework on that which uses SDRAM_MAX_SIZE as instructed, build and boot tested on my hardware.

Quoted 7 lines

In that case you just masked the problem but didn???t solve it: assuming size_mb is size_t (I???ll assume this is 64bit, but did not check), then your 4GB is 0x1_0000_0000 ) which overflows to 0x0 when converted to a u32.

In other words: we need to figure out where the truncation occurs (image what happens if a new 32bit processor with LPAE comes out???).

A very valid point. With the following patch to sdram_common.c and sdram_rk3288.c applied I get the debug output that follows it:

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +4 -0
index 232a7fa655..0fe69bf558 100644
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 * SPDX-License-Identifier:     GPL-2.0+
 */
 
+#define DEBUG 1
 #include <common.h>
 #include <dm.h>
 #include <ram.h>
@@ -39,16 +40,19 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 			SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
 
 		chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20));
+		debug("%s: %d: chipsize_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, chipsize_mb);
 
 		if (rank > 1)
 			chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row);
 		if (row_3_4)
 			chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4;
 		size_mb += chipsize_mb;
+		debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb);
 		debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n",
 		      rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4);
 	}
 
+	debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb);
 	size_mb = min(size_mb, SDRAM_MAX_SIZE/SZ_1M);
 
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;
drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3288.c +1 -1
index d99bf12476..9738eb088f 100644
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 * Adapted from coreboot.
 */
 
+#define DEBUG 1
 #include <common.h>
 #include <clk.h>
 #include <dm.h>
 
---

U-Boot SPL 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500) Trying to boot from SPI

U-Boot 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500)

Model: Google Speedy
DRAM: rockchip_sdram_size ff73009c 3c50dc50
rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400
rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 800
rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0
rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400
rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 1000
rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0
rockchip_sdram_size: 54: size_mb 1000
SDRAM base=0, size=fe000000
4 GiB

MMC:   dwmmc@ff0c0000: 1, dwmmc@ff0d0000: 2, dwmmc@ff0f0000: 0
In:    cros-ec-keyb
Out:   vidconsole
Err:   vidconsole
Model: Google Speedy
rockchip_dnl_key_pressed: adc_channel_single_shot fail!
Net:   Net Initialization Skipped
Quoted 4 lines

No ethernet found.
Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0
I guess we need to change the size_t to something larger; unless I'm mistaken, that's a 32 bit value, right? and 0x100000000 is at least 40

4GB is actually the 33rd bit set and the lower 32bits cleared (i.e. the largest 32bit value ???plus one???).

Quoted 6 lines

bits, unless I'm missing the issue here somewhere. However, that would take a change to include/ram.h, and would impact far more than just rk3288/rockchip devices across the board, so I'm unsure how to proceed.

Use the min macro here for now, and begin work migrating the ram_info size member to a 64-bit container?

The min() doesn???t make any sense here, as we implement the hook function ???board_get_usable_ram_top??? just a few lines later???
We are at the start of the merge window right now, so I???d rather hold off a week (or two) and have a permanent solution than merging just a band-aid now and then having the full fix come in later during the merge window.

Quoted 3 lines

I briefly reviewed the situation yesterday and it looks like the size field in ram_info is the culprit: it???s defined as ???size_t???, which again is __SIZE_TYPE__ which again is ???unsigned int??? on a (32bit) arm-*-eabi compiler.

Yeah, I was talking about this with Marek on irc yesterday, I had the same conclusion. However, being very new and inexperienced with u-boot development in general, I'm a bit averse to to messing with what appears to be a global header file, as it can easily break any other board which uses it.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines

No problem ??? let???s wait for Simon???s input and I???ll create the patchset. I???ll need your help testing, as I don???t have any 32bit platforms w/ 4GB??? and I???ll let you know once something is ready for you to test.

Even if we do change ram_info.size into a larger, 64-bit variable, we should still probably use that min call since with a 32-bit address space, even with 4GiB ram physically, the rk3288 can only address 0xff00000 of ram, which is just a tad shy of the full 4GiB.

This is not the meaning of ram_info.size, though… for the addressability there’s the ‘board_get_usable_ram_top’ hook used today.

Unfortunately, there’s no formal definition (i.e. clear documentation of this in a header file) of board_get_usable_ram_top; however, the default (weak) implementation in board_f hints at the intent to use it to clip the end if the ’size’ field exceeds the addressable space:
/*
* Detect whether we have so much RAM that it goes past the end of our
* 32-bit address space. If so, clip the usable RAM so it doesn't. */

This is also consistent with usage on Tegra and a few others.
Until someone decides that ram_info should not hold the DRAM controller’s view, but rather consider addressability by the CPU, I strongly disagree with applying the carveout for the MMIO this early.

Also note that just because this part of memory is not addressable from the CPUs does not necessarily mean that it is not addressable from one of the DMA controllers (I don’t know enough about the internal implementation of the address decode logic in this SoC to determine whether that part of memory is really unaccessible or if it is merely “special”).

Quoted 32 lines
Quoted 32 lines
Quoted 32 lines
Quoted 32 lines

Expanding this to a phys_size_t won???t be doing us much good, either (as that one will also be 32bits for the RK3288).

The root cause of this is really that the RAM size and the ???usable RAM??? are two different concepts in U-Boot. On a 32bit physical address space with memory-mapped peripherals, we can never have the full 4GB of DRAM as we???ll also have some of the physical address-space set aside for the MMIO; however, the MMIO range is only removed from the DRAM size when the usable ram-top is evaluated??? so the size can be 4GB after all and overflow the 32bit size_t. Note that this separation into two different steps makes a lot of sense, as processors might not use MMIO but specialised instructions to access peripheral space???in which case there might indeed be a usable memory of 4GB on a 32bit physical address space.

From what I can tell, we???ll need to do two things:
(a) fix arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c to not use 32bit types
for the memory size
(b) touch ram.h to change the type of the ???size??? field in ram_info (it needs
to be larger than 32bits

I???d like Simon???s input (as he owns ram.h) and can create a patchset for this change, if he agrees that this is the way forward.

Regards,
Philipp.

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines

Thanks,
- Kever

Quoted 2 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +0 -0
 	}
 
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 58

Quoted 1 line
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +0 -0
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot <https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot>

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

#30 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 3/3] rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

I had a bit more time to look into this and it looks as if we have two problem-spots...

First, there's a type-mismatch between ram_info.size (a size_t) and gd.ram_size (phys_size_t). While we can increase the size of a phys_size_t to 64bit (by defining CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT), the size_t will always be an unsigned int on a 32bit arm architecture. So here’s one possible pitfall that should be resolved.

Once this is adjusted, we might just increase the width of ram_info.size to 64bit by enabling CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT … however, this comes with a caveat: the default cell sizes for the FDT (via fdtdec) also increases. I.e. if any come in our arch or the drivers still goes through the fdtdec-functions, we’ll end up with a problem.

As my test coverage is limited to 64bit targets, I can’t tell whether defining the PHYS_64BIT configuration would be possible for the RK3288 — if it is, we’d have a rather easy way forward and could reuse the phys_size_t for ram_info.size.

I’d appreciate if you could take a look at whether CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT gets us into a lot of trouble on the RK3288 or whether this will trigger just a few minor adjustments…

Thanks,
Philipp.

Quoted 260 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich
Quoted 187 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 182 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich
Quoted 181 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 169 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich

Marty,

Quoted 146 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 64 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich
Quoted 61 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 36 lines · Kever Yang

Hi Marty,

Quoted 4 lines · Marty E. Plummer

Taken from coreboot's src/soc/rockchip/rk3288/sdram.c

Without this change, my u-boot build for the asus c201 chromebook (4GiB) is incorrectly detected as 0 Bytes of ram.

I know the root cause for this issue, and I have a local patch for it. The rk3288 is 32bit, and 4GB size is just out of range, so we need to before the max size before return with '<<20'. Sorry for forgot to send it out.

Quoted 23 lines

---
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++-----------

1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +2 -0
index 76dbdc8715..a9c9f970a4 100644
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/arch/sdram_common.h>
 #include <dm/uclass-internal.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
@@ -19,34 +21,44 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 	size_t size_mb = 0;
 	u32 ch;
 
Quoted 8 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 24

Quoted 4 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +1 -3
-	u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
-	u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
-		       & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
+	if (!size_mb) {

I don't understand this and follow up changes, we don't really need it, isn't it?
I think don't need the changes before here.

Yeah, that was just another level of indentation for the if (!size_mb) guard, but I've reworked the patch to not do that as it was pointed out that since size_mb is initialized to 0 prior.

Quoted 10 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 30

Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +6 -0
+		/*
+		 * we use the 0x00000000~0xfeffffff space
+		 * since 0xff000000~0xffffffff is soc register space
+		 * so we reserve it
+		 */
+		size_mb = min(size_mb, 0xff000000/SZ_1M);

This is what we really need, as Klaus point out, we need to use SDRAM_MAX_SIZE
instead of hard code.

Quoted 2 lines

Yeah, I've got a rework on that which uses SDRAM_MAX_SIZE as instructed, build and boot tested on my hardware.

Quoted 7 lines

In that case you just masked the problem but didn???t solve it: assuming size_mb is size_t (I???ll assume this is 64bit, but did not check), then your 4GB is 0x1_0000_0000 ) which overflows to 0x0 when converted to a u32.

In other words: we need to figure out where the truncation occurs (image what happens if a new 32bit processor with LPAE comes out???).

A very valid point. With the following patch to sdram_common.c and sdram_rk3288.c applied I get the debug output that follows it:

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +4 -0
index 232a7fa655..0fe69bf558 100644
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 * SPDX-License-Identifier:     GPL-2.0+
 */
 
+#define DEBUG 1
 #include <common.h>
 #include <dm.h>
 #include <ram.h>
@@ -39,16 +40,19 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 			SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
 
 		chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20));
+		debug("%s: %d: chipsize_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, chipsize_mb);
 
 		if (rank > 1)
 			chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row);
 		if (row_3_4)
 			chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4;
 		size_mb += chipsize_mb;
+		debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb);
 		debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n",
 		      rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4);
 	}
 
+	debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb);
 	size_mb = min(size_mb, SDRAM_MAX_SIZE/SZ_1M);
 
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;
drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3288.c +1 -1
index d99bf12476..9738eb088f 100644
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 * Adapted from coreboot.
 */
 
+#define DEBUG 1
 #include <common.h>
 #include <clk.h>
 #include <dm.h>
 
---

U-Boot SPL 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500) Trying to boot from SPI

U-Boot 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500)

Model: Google Speedy
DRAM: rockchip_sdram_size ff73009c 3c50dc50
rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400
rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 800
rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0
rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400
rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 1000
rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0
rockchip_sdram_size: 54: size_mb 1000
SDRAM base=0, size=fe000000
4 GiB

MMC:   dwmmc@ff0c0000: 1, dwmmc@ff0d0000: 2, dwmmc@ff0f0000: 0
In:    cros-ec-keyb
Out:   vidconsole
Err:   vidconsole
Model: Google Speedy
rockchip_dnl_key_pressed: adc_channel_single_shot fail!
Net:   Net Initialization Skipped
Quoted 4 lines

No ethernet found.
Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0
I guess we need to change the size_t to something larger; unless I'm mistaken, that's a 32 bit value, right? and 0x100000000 is at least 40

4GB is actually the 33rd bit set and the lower 32bits cleared (i.e. the largest 32bit value ???plus one???).

Quoted 6 lines

bits, unless I'm missing the issue here somewhere. However, that would take a change to include/ram.h, and would impact far more than just rk3288/rockchip devices across the board, so I'm unsure how to proceed.

Use the min macro here for now, and begin work migrating the ram_info size member to a 64-bit container?

The min() doesn???t make any sense here, as we implement the hook function ???board_get_usable_ram_top??? just a few lines later???
We are at the start of the merge window right now, so I???d rather hold off a week (or two) and have a permanent solution than merging just a band-aid now and then having the full fix come in later during the merge window.

Quoted 3 lines

I briefly reviewed the situation yesterday and it looks like the size field in ram_info is the culprit: it???s defined as ???size_t???, which again is __SIZE_TYPE__ which again is ???unsigned int??? on a (32bit) arm-*-eabi compiler.

Yeah, I was talking about this with Marek on irc yesterday, I had the same conclusion. However, being very new and inexperienced with u-boot development in general, I'm a bit averse to to messing with what appears to be a global header file, as it can easily break any other board which uses it.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines

No problem ??? let???s wait for Simon???s input and I???ll create the patchset. I???ll need your help testing, as I don???t have any 32bit platforms w/ 4GB??? and I???ll let you know once something is ready for you to test.

Even if we do change ram_info.size into a larger, 64-bit variable, we should still probably use that min call since with a 32-bit address space, even with 4GiB ram physically, the rk3288 can only address 0xff00000 of ram, which is just a tad shy of the full 4GiB.

This is not the meaning of ram_info.size, though… for the addressability there’s the ‘board_get_usable_ram_top’ hook used today.

Unfortunately, there’s no formal definition (i.e. clear documentation of this in a header file) of board_get_usable_ram_top; however, the default (weak) implementation in board_f hints at the intent to use it to clip the end if the ’size’ field exceeds the addressable space:
/*
* Detect whether we have so much RAM that it goes past the end of our
* 32-bit address space. If so, clip the usable RAM so it doesn't. */

This is also consistent with usage on Tegra and a few others.
Until someone decides that ram_info should not hold the DRAM controller’s view, but rather consider addressability by the CPU, I strongly disagree with applying the carveout for the MMIO this early.

Also note that just because this part of memory is not addressable from the CPUs does not necessarily mean that it is not addressable from one of the DMA controllers (I don’t know enough about the internal implementation of the address decode logic in this SoC to determine whether that part of memory is really unaccessible or if it is merely “special”).

Quoted 32 lines
Quoted 32 lines
Quoted 32 lines
Quoted 32 lines

Expanding this to a phys_size_t won???t be doing us much good, either (as that one will also be 32bits for the RK3288).

The root cause of this is really that the RAM size and the ???usable RAM??? are two different concepts in U-Boot. On a 32bit physical address space with memory-mapped peripherals, we can never have the full 4GB of DRAM as we???ll also have some of the physical address-space set aside for the MMIO; however, the MMIO range is only removed from the DRAM size when the usable ram-top is evaluated??? so the size can be 4GB after all and overflow the 32bit size_t. Note that this separation into two different steps makes a lot of sense, as processors might not use MMIO but specialised instructions to access peripheral space???in which case there might indeed be a usable memory of 4GB on a 32bit physical address space.

From what I can tell, we???ll need to do two things:
(a) fix arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c to not use 32bit types
for the memory size
(b) touch ram.h to change the type of the ???size??? field in ram_info (it needs
to be larger than 32bits

I???d like Simon???s input (as he owns ram.h) and can create a patchset for this change, if he agrees that this is the way forward.

Regards,
Philipp.

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines

Thanks,
- Kever

Quoted 2 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +0 -0
 	}
 
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 33

Quoted 1 line
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +0 -0
 	return (size_t)size_mb << 20;

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot <https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot>

Quoted 4 lines

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

#31 lore raw

PATCH 3/3 rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

Quoted 16 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich

I had a bit more time to look into this and it looks as if we have two problem-spots...

First, there's a type-mismatch between ram_info.size (a size_t) and gd.ram_size (phys_size_t). While we can increase the size of a phys_size_t to 64bit (by defining CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT), the size_t will always be an unsigned int on a 32bit arm architecture. So here's one possible pitfall that should be resolved.

Once this is adjusted, we might just increase the width of ram_info.size to 64bit by enabling CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT ... however, this comes with a caveat: the default cell sizes for the FDT (via fdtdec) also increases. I.e. if any come in our arch or the drivers still goes through the fdtdec-functions, we'll end up with a problem.

As my test coverage is limited to 64bit targets, I can't tell whether defining the PHYS_64BIT configuration would be possible for the RK3288 -- if it is, we'd have a rather easy way forward and could reuse the phys_size_t for ram_info.size.

Quoted 5 lines

I'd appreciate if you could take a look at whether CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT gets us into a lot of trouble on the RK3288 or whether this will trigger just a few minor adjustments...

Thanks,
Philipp.

So explain to me what you'd like me to do here, if you would. What I gather from this is you want me to flip CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT and see if it works or what? I can flash/reflash u-boot and coreboot pretty easily on the device, so I'm down for any sort of hardware testing needed to get this into a usable state.

Regards,
Marty.

#32 lore raw

PATCH 3/3 rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

Marty,

Quoted 22 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 19 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich

I had a bit more time to look into this and it looks as if we have two problem-spots...

First, there's a type-mismatch between ram_info.size (a size_t) and gd.ram_size (phys_size_t). While we can increase the size of a phys_size_t to 64bit (by defining CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT), the size_t will always be an unsigned int on a 32bit arm architecture. So here's one possible pitfall that should be resolved.

Once this is adjusted, we might just increase the width of ram_info.size to 64bit by enabling CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT ... however, this comes with a caveat: the default cell sizes for the FDT (via fdtdec) also increases. I.e. if any come in our arch or the drivers still goes through the fdtdec-functions, we'll end up with a problem.

As my test coverage is limited to 64bit targets, I can't tell whether defining the PHYS_64BIT configuration would be possible for the RK3288 -- if it is, we'd have a rather easy way forward and could reuse the phys_size_t for ram_info.size.

I'd appreciate if you could take a look at whether CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT gets us into a lot of trouble on the RK3288 or whether this will trigger just a few minor adjustments...

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Thanks,
Philipp.

So explain to me what you'd like me to do here, if you would. What I gather from this is you want me to flip CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT and see if it works or what? I can flash/reflash u-boot and coreboot pretty easily on the device, so I'm down for any sort of hardware testing needed to get this into a usable state.

Yes, just enable PHYS_64BIT and report on how far it goes (activating some debug may be helpful to understand what goes wrong, if it fails).

My gut feeling is that it could work, but there’s a number of pitfalls and we may not be lucky.

Regards,
Philipp.

#33 lore raw

PATCH 3/3 rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

Quoted 10 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich

Marty,

Quoted 7 lines · Marty E. Plummer

So explain to me what you'd like me to do here, if you would. What I gather from this is you want me to flip CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT and see if it works or what? I can flash/reflash u-boot and coreboot pretty easily on the device, so I'm down for any sort of hardware testing needed to get this into a usable state.

Quoted 6 lines

Yes, just enable PHYS_64BIT and report on how far it goes (activating some debug may be helpful to understand what goes wrong, if it fails).

My gut feeling is that it could work, but there’s a number of pitfalls and we may not be lucky.

Testing flipping CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT, both with and without my 'clamping' patch to sdram_common.c, has the same results, in that all that is output on the servo console is that wierd <?> output. Where to from here, then?

#34 lore raw

PATCH 3/3 rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

Marty,

Quoted 16 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 13 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich

Marty,

Quoted 7 lines · Marty E. Plummer

So explain to me what you'd like me to do here, if you would. What I gather from this is you want me to flip CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT and see if it works or what? I can flash/reflash u-boot and coreboot pretty easily on the device, so I'm down for any sort of hardware testing needed to get this into a usable state.

Yes, just enable PHYS_64BIT and report on how far it goes (activating some debug may be helpful to understand what goes wrong, if it fails).

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines

My gut feeling is that it could work, but there’s a number of pitfalls and we may not be lucky.

Testing flipping CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT, both with and without my 'clamping' patch to sdram_common.c, has the same results, in that all that is output on the servo console is that wierd <?> output. Where to from here, then?

I have a patchset for changing the relevant fields in U-Boot to allow for 33bits (i.e. using u64) for the RAM size and it finally passes Travis cleanly. It will be another round or two of cleanup before I can submit the series — once this happens, I’ll copy you so you can give your Tested-by if it works…

Thanks,
Phil.

#35 lore raw

PATCH 3/3 rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

Quoted 7 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich

I have a patchset for changing the relevant fields in U-Boot to allow for 33bits (i.e. using u64) for the RAM size and it finally passes Travis cleanly.
It will be another round or two of cleanup before I can submit the series — once this happens, I’ll copy you so you can give your Tested-by if it works…

I'm interested. Please put me in CC as well.

Signature · 1 line
Carlo Caione <[email protected]>
#36 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 3/3] rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

In reply to Dr. Philipp Tomsich

Hi,

Quoted 187 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich

Marty,

Quoted 146 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 64 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich
Quoted 58 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 36 lines · Kever Yang

Hi Marty,

Quoted 4 lines · Marty E. Plummer

Taken from coreboot's src/soc/rockchip/rk3288/sdram.c

Without this change, my u-boot build for the asus c201 chromebook (4GiB) is incorrectly detected as 0 Bytes of ram.

I know the root cause for this issue, and I have a local patch for it. The rk3288 is 32bit, and 4GB size is just out of range, so we need to before the max size before return with '<<20'. Sorry for forgot to send it out.

Quoted 23 lines

---
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++-----------

1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +2 -0
index 76dbdc8715..a9c9f970a4 100644
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/arch/sdram_common.h>
 #include <dm/uclass-internal.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
@@ -19,34 +21,44 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
  size_t size_mb = 0;
  u32 ch;
 
Quoted 8 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 24

Quoted 4 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +1 -3
- u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
- u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
-                & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
+ if (!size_mb) {

I don't understand this and follow up changes, we don't really need it, isn't it?
I think don't need the changes before here.

Yeah, that was just another level of indentation for the if (!size_mb) guard, but I've reworked the patch to not do that as it was pointed out that since size_mb is initialized to 0 prior.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +6 -0
+         /*
+          * we use the 0x00000000~0xfeffffff space
+          * since 0xff000000~0xffffffff is soc register space
+          * so we reserve it
+          */
+         size_mb = min(size_mb, 0xff000000/SZ_1M);
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines

This is what we really need, as Klaus point out, we need to use SDRAM_MAX_SIZE
instead of hard code.

Yeah, I've got a rework on that which uses SDRAM_MAX_SIZE as instructed, build and boot tested on my hardware.

Quoted 7 lines

In that case you just masked the problem but didn???t solve it: assuming size_mb is size_t (I???ll assume this is 64bit, but did not check), then your 4GB is 0x1_0000_0000 ) which overflows to 0x0 when converted to a u32.

In other words: we need to figure out where the truncation occurs (image what happens if a new 32bit processor with LPAE comes out???).

A very valid point. With the following patch to sdram_common.c and sdram_rk3288.c applied I get the debug output that follows it:

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +4 -0
index 232a7fa655..0fe69bf558 100644
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 * SPDX-License-Identifier:     GPL-2.0+
 */
 
+#define DEBUG 1
 #include <common.h>
 #include <dm.h>
 #include <ram.h>
@@ -39,16 +40,19 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
                      SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
 
              chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20));
+             debug("%s: %d: chipsize_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, chipsize_mb);
 
              if (rank > 1)
                      chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row);
              if (row_3_4)
                      chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4;
              size_mb += chipsize_mb;
+             debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb);
              debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n",
                    rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4);
      }
 
+     debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb);
      size_mb = min(size_mb, SDRAM_MAX_SIZE/SZ_1M);
 
      return (size_t)size_mb << 20;
drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3288.c +1 -1
index d99bf12476..9738eb088f 100644
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 * Adapted from coreboot.
 */
 
+#define DEBUG 1
 #include <common.h>
 #include <clk.h>
 #include <dm.h>
 
---

U-Boot SPL 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500) Trying to boot from SPI

U-Boot 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500)

Model: Google Speedy
DRAM: rockchip_sdram_size ff73009c 3c50dc50
rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400
rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 800
rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0
rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400
rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 1000
rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0
rockchip_sdram_size: 54: size_mb 1000
SDRAM base=0, size=fe000000
4 GiB

MMC:   dwmmc@ff0c0000: 1, dwmmc@ff0d0000: 2, dwmmc@ff0f0000: 0
In:    cros-ec-keyb
Out:   vidconsole
Err:   vidconsole
Model: Google Speedy
rockchip_dnl_key_pressed: adc_channel_single_shot fail!
Net:   Net Initialization Skipped
Quoted 4 lines

No ethernet found.
Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0
I guess we need to change the size_t to something larger; unless I'm mistaken, that's a 32 bit value, right? and 0x100000000 is at least 40

4GB is actually the 33rd bit set and the lower 32bits cleared (i.e. the largest 32bit value “plus one”).

Quoted 6 lines

bits, unless I'm missing the issue here somewhere. However, that would take a change to include/ram.h, and would impact far more than just rk3288/rockchip devices across the board, so I'm unsure how to proceed.

Use the min macro here for now, and begin work migrating the ram_info size member to a 64-bit container?

The min() doesn’t make any sense here, as we implement the hook function ‘board_get_usable_ram_top’ just a few lines later…
We are at the start of the merge window right now, so I’d rather hold off a week (or two) and have a permanent solution than merging just a band-aid now and then having the full fix come in later during the merge window.

I briefly reviewed the situation yesterday and it looks like the size field in ram_info is the culprit: it’s defined as ‘size_t’, which again is __SIZE_TYPE__ which again is ‘unsigned int’ on a (32bit) arm-*-eabi compiler.

Expanding this to a phys_size_t won’t be doing us much good, either (as that one will also be 32bits for the RK3288).

The root cause of this is really that the RAM size and the ‘usable RAM’ are two different concepts in U-Boot. On a 32bit physical address space with memory-mapped peripherals, we can never have the full 4GB of DRAM as we’ll also have some of the physical address-space set aside for the MMIO; however, the MMIO range is only removed from the DRAM size when the usable ram-top is evaluated… so the size can be 4GB after all and overflow the 32bit size_t. Note that this separation into two different steps makes a lot of sense, as processors might not use MMIO but specialised instructions to access peripheral space—in which case there might indeed be a usable memory of 4GB on a 32bit physical address space.

Quoted 8 lines

From what I can tell, we’ll need to do two things:
(a) fix arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c to not use 32bit types
for the memory size
(b) touch ram.h to change the type of the ‘size’ field in ram_info (it needs
to be larger than 32bits

I’d like Simon’s input (as he owns ram.h) and can create a patchset for this change, if he agrees that this is the way forward.

Sorry I missed this. Yes changing ram.h is fine with me. In fact I thought that size_t would be OK. Clearly not.

Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

#37 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 3/3] rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

Quoted 199 lines · Simon Glass

Hi,

Quoted 193 lines · On 8 May 2018 at 04:21, Dr. Philipp Tomsich…

Marty,

Quoted 146 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 64 lines · Dr. Philipp Tomsich
Quoted 58 lines · Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 36 lines · Kever Yang

Hi Marty,

Quoted 4 lines · Marty E. Plummer

Taken from coreboot's src/soc/rockchip/rk3288/sdram.c

Without this change, my u-boot build for the asus c201 chromebook (4GiB) is incorrectly detected as 0 Bytes of ram.

I know the root cause for this issue, and I have a local patch for it. The rk3288 is 32bit, and 4GB size is just out of range, so we need to before the max size before return with '<<20'. Sorry for forgot to send it out.

Quoted 23 lines

---
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++-----------

1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +2 -0
index 76dbdc8715..a9c9f970a4 100644
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/arch/sdram_common.h>
 #include <dm/uclass-internal.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
 
 DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
 size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
@@ -19,34 +21,44 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
 size_t size_mb = 0;
 u32 ch;
 
Quoted 8 lines

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg) · line 24

Quoted 4 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +1 -3
- u32 sys_reg = readl(reg);
- u32 ch_num = 1 + ((sys_reg >> SYS_REG_NUM_CH_SHIFT)
-                & SYS_REG_NUM_CH_MASK);
+ if (!size_mb) {

I don't understand this and follow up changes, we don't really need it, isn't it?
I think don't need the changes before here.

Yeah, that was just another level of indentation for the if (!size_mb) guard, but I've reworked the patch to not do that as it was pointed out that since size_mb is initialized to 0 prior.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +6 -0
+         /*
+          * we use the 0x00000000~0xfeffffff space
+          * since 0xff000000~0xffffffff is soc register space
+          * so we reserve it
+          */
+         size_mb = min(size_mb, 0xff000000/SZ_1M);
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines

This is what we really need, as Klaus point out, we need to use SDRAM_MAX_SIZE
instead of hard code.

Yeah, I've got a rework on that which uses SDRAM_MAX_SIZE as instructed, build and boot tested on my hardware.

Quoted 7 lines

In that case you just masked the problem but didn???t solve it: assuming size_mb is size_t (I???ll assume this is 64bit, but did not check), then your 4GB is 0x1_0000_0000 ) which overflows to 0x0 when converted to a u32.

In other words: we need to figure out where the truncation occurs (image what happens if a new 32bit processor with LPAE comes out???).

A very valid point. With the following patch to sdram_common.c and sdram_rk3288.c applied I get the debug output that follows it:

arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c +4 -0
index 232a7fa655..0fe69bf558 100644
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 * SPDX-License-Identifier:     GPL-2.0+
 */
 
+#define DEBUG 1
 #include <common.h>
 #include <dm.h>
 #include <ram.h>
@@ -39,16 +40,19 @@ size_t rockchip_sdram_size(phys_addr_t reg)
                     SYS_REG_ROW_3_4_MASK;
 
             chipsize_mb = (1 << (cs0_row + col + bk + bw - 20));
+             debug("%s: %d: chipsize_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, chipsize_mb);
 
             if (rank > 1)
                     chipsize_mb += chipsize_mb >> (cs0_row - cs1_row);
             if (row_3_4)
                     chipsize_mb = chipsize_mb * 3 / 4;
             size_mb += chipsize_mb;
+             debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb);
             debug("rank %d col %d bk %d cs0_row %d bw %d row_3_4 %d\n",
                   rank, col, bk, cs0_row, bw, row_3_4);
     }
 
+     debug("%s: %d: size_mb %x\n", __func__, __LINE__, size_mb);
     size_mb = min(size_mb, SDRAM_MAX_SIZE/SZ_1M);
 
     return (size_t)size_mb << 20;
drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3288.c +1 -1
index d99bf12476..9738eb088f 100644
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 * Adapted from coreboot.
 */
 
+#define DEBUG 1
 #include <common.h>
 #include <clk.h>
 #include <dm.h>
 
---

U-Boot SPL 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500) Trying to boot from SPI

U-Boot 2018.05-rc3-02370-g309384e84b-dirty (May 07 2018 - 19:42:15 -0500)

Model: Google Speedy
DRAM: rockchip_sdram_size ff73009c 3c50dc50
rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400
rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 800
rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0
rockchip_sdram_size: 42: chipsize_mb 400
rockchip_sdram_size: 49: size_mb 1000
rank 2 col 11 bk 3 cs0_row 14 bw 2 row_3_4 0
rockchip_sdram_size: 54: size_mb 1000
SDRAM base=0, size=fe000000
4 GiB

MMC:   dwmmc@ff0c0000: 1, dwmmc@ff0d0000: 2, dwmmc@ff0f0000: 0
In:    cros-ec-keyb
Out:   vidconsole
Err:   vidconsole
Model: Google Speedy
rockchip_dnl_key_pressed: adc_channel_single_shot fail!
Net:   Net Initialization Skipped
Quoted 4 lines

No ethernet found.
Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0
I guess we need to change the size_t to something larger; unless I'm mistaken, that's a 32 bit value, right? and 0x100000000 is at least 40

4GB is actually the 33rd bit set and the lower 32bits cleared (i.e. the largest 32bit value “plus one”).

Quoted 6 lines

bits, unless I'm missing the issue here somewhere. However, that would take a change to include/ram.h, and would impact far more than just rk3288/rockchip devices across the board, so I'm unsure how to proceed.

Use the min macro here for now, and begin work migrating the ram_info size member to a 64-bit container?

The min() doesn’t make any sense here, as we implement the hook function ‘board_get_usable_ram_top’ just a few lines later…
We are at the start of the merge window right now, so I’d rather hold off a week (or two) and have a permanent solution than merging just a band-aid now and then having the full fix come in later during the merge window.

I briefly reviewed the situation yesterday and it looks like the size field in ram_info is the culprit: it’s defined as ‘size_t’, which again is __SIZE_TYPE__ which again is ‘unsigned int’ on a (32bit) arm-*-eabi compiler.

Expanding this to a phys_size_t won’t be doing us much good, either (as that one will also be 32bits for the RK3288).

The root cause of this is really that the RAM size and the ‘usable RAM’ are two different concepts in U-Boot. On a 32bit physical address space with memory-mapped peripherals, we can never have the full 4GB of DRAM as we’ll also have some of the physical address-space set aside for the MMIO; however, the MMIO range is only removed from the DRAM size when the usable ram-top is evaluated… so the size can be 4GB after all and overflow the 32bit size_t. Note that this separation into two different steps makes a lot of sense, as processors might not use MMIO but specialised instructions to access peripheral space—in which case there might indeed be a usable memory of 4GB on a 32bit physical address space.

From what I can tell, we’ll need to do two things:
(a) fix arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c to not use 32bit types
for the memory size
(b) touch ram.h to change the type of the ‘size’ field in ram_info (it needs
to be larger than 32bits

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines

I’d like Simon’s input (as he owns ram.h) and can create a patchset for this change, if he agrees that this is the way forward.

Sorry I missed this. Yes changing ram.h is fine with me. In fact I thought that size_t would be OK. Clearly not.

Ok, I’ll try to get this done over the next few days.

Quoted 2 lines

Regards,
Simon

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

#38 lore raw

cover add support for the asus C201 chromebook (4GiB)

In reply to Marty E. Plummer
Quoted 10 lines · Marty E. Plummer

Build and boot tested on my chromebook, which was generously altered by Simon Glass to have a servo header and also generously provided a servo board itself to do debugging with.

It ''works'', but has a few oddities. I can't seem to get it to see my external sdcard or a usb flash drive, so I've been having to ymodem my kernel, fdt, and initramfs over to test booting (which does work). The screen is a bit inconsistent on whether or not it activates any given power cycle, but when it does work, it works right.

Quoted 4 lines

The changes to sdram_common.c were taken from coreboot, as it has otherwise identical code (minus the if (!size_mb) block), and actually works on my hardware.

Oh, and one other thing: unless I revert commit c3c0331db1fb7b1f4ff41e144fc04353b37c785c, I do not get any output on the debug uart, but I didn't want to send a revert commit without discussion, even more so than the the other stuff I'm providing.

That being said, can anyone else with a rockchip device using u-boot give current u-boot master a try and see if I'm the only one not getting console output after that commit?

Quoted 20 lines

Marty E. Plummer (3):
sf: Add GigaDevice gd25q32b entry
rockchip: add support for veyron-speedy (ASUS Chromebook C201)
rockchip: fix incorrect detection of ram size

 arch/arm/dts/Makefile                     |   1 +
 arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts     | 189 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288-board-spl.c |   3 +-
 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3288/Kconfig     |  11 ++
 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram_common.c     |  62 ++++---
 board/google/veyron/Kconfig               |  16 ++
 configs/chromebook_speedy_defconfig       |  96 +++++++++++
 drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash_ids.c           |   1 +
 8 files changed, 353 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/rk3288-veyron-speedy.dts
 create mode 100644 configs/chromebook_speedy_defconfig
Signature · 1 line
2.17.0