nvme: continue keep alive on error
PATCH v2 1/1 nvme: continue keep alive on error
Currently, if the keep_alive command failed, an error message is generated and keep alive is stopped. This guarantees the target will eventually not see a keep_alive in a KATO window and fail.
The keep_alive command may complete in error in cases where the transport or lldd are temporarily out of resources. As such, the command should be retried rather than letting the controller die.
If the command completes in error, retry another one after a short delay. Track whether keep alive has had an error to reduce printing the error message to the first failure only.
---
v2: add ka_error so that info print isn't 4 times a second for
a repeating error.
--- drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 17 +++++++++++------ drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/nvme/host/core.c +11 -6
@@ -791,17 +791,21 @@ static int nvme_submit_user_cmd(struct request_queue *q,static void nvme_keep_alive_end_io (struct request *rq,blk_status_t status) {struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl = rq->end_io_data; +unsigned long delay = ctrl->kato *HZ ;blk_mq_free_request (rq);if (status) { -dev_err (ctrl->device, -"failed nvme_keep_alive_end_io error=%d\n" , - status); -return ; - } +if (!ctrl->ka_error) +dev_info (ctrl->device, +"failed nvme_keep_alive_end_io error=%d, " +"retrying\n" , status); + ctrl->ka_error = true; + delay = (HZ /4 );/* 250ms */ + }else + ctrl->ka_error = false; -schedule_delayed_work (&ctrl->ka_work, ctrl->kato *HZ ); +schedule_delayed_work (&ctrl->ka_work, delay); }static int nvme_keep_alive (struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
@@ -839,6 +843,7 @@ static void nvme_start_keep_alive(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)if (unlikely (ctrl->kato ==0 ))return ; + ctrl->ka_error = false;schedule_delayed_work (&ctrl->ka_work, ctrl->kato *HZ ); }
drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h +1 -0
@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ struct nvme_ctrl {u32 aen_result;unsigned int shutdown_timeout;unsigned int kato; +bool ka_error;bool subsystem;unsigned long quirks;struct nvme_id_power_state psd[32 ];
Signature · 1 line
2.13.1
PATCH v2 1/1 nvme: continue keep alive on error
Quoted 11 lines · James Smart
Currently, if the
keep_alivecommand failed, an error message is generated and keep alive is stopped. This guarantees the target will eventually not see akeep_alivein a KATO window and fail.The
keep_alivecommand may complete in error in cases where the transport or lldd are temporarily out of resources. As such, the command should be retried rather than letting the controller die.If the command completes in error, retry another one after a short delay. Track whether keep alive has had an error to reduce printing the error message to the first failure only.
This seems pretty much counter the definition of the keep alive. What kinds of errors do you see when you'd want to retry? How we can we figute out we hit exactly that case instead of just wasting our time retrying?
PATCH v2 1/1 nvme: continue keep alive on error
Quoted 9 lines · Christoph Hellwig
Quoted 8 lines · James Smart
Currently, if the
keep_alivecommand failed, an error message is generated and keep alive is stopped. This guarantees the target will eventually not see akeep_alivein a KATO window and fail.The
keep_alivecommand may complete in error in cases where the transport or lldd are temporarily out of resources. As such, the command should be retried rather than letting the controller die.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
If the command completes in error, retry another one after a short delay. Track whether keep alive has had an error to reduce printing the error message to the first failure only.
This seems pretty much counter the definition of the keep alive. What kinds of errors do you see when you'd want to retry? How we can we figute out we hit exactly that case instead of just wasting our time retrying?
The error is a temporary adapter resource error that wants the upper layer to retry the command, whatever command it was, after a short delay.
Taking another look at the code and the history of this issue:? the transport should be returning BLK_STS_RESOURCE and the blk-mq layer will take care of the retry. But the transport only does so if the LLDD returned a -EBUSY response. And lpfc until the recent patches, didn't always return -EBUSY.? So it was a driver error.
Ok - I'll drop this one too.
-- james