libphidget: bump to version 2.1.8.20170607
PATCH 40/42 libphidget: bump to version 2.1.8.20170607
Add hash for license file
--- package/libphidget/libphidget.hash | 3 ++- package/libphidget/libphidget.mk | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
package/libphidget/libphidget.hash +2 -1
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ # locally computed -sha256 2d496828a085ada8ff139da9306bd2b8cb987798fee93caf0089dc399195e238 libphidget_2.1.8.20140319.tar.gz +sha256 f6da13dc0db057c1a87e0a831e3f5507cd26a32f3ced40f2c0ad783fc244bcd5 libphidget_2.1.8.20170607.tar.gz +sha256 8ceb4b9ee5adedde47b31e975c1d90c73ad27b6b165a1dcd80c7c545eb65b903 COPYING
package/libphidget/libphidget.mk +1 -1
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ # ################################################################################ -LIBPHIDGET_VERSION = 2.1.8.20140319 +LIBPHIDGET_VERSION = 2.1.8.20170607 LIBPHIDGET_SOURCE = libphidget_$(LIBPHIDGET_VERSION).tar.gz LIBPHIDGET_SITE = https://www.phidgets.com/downloads/phidget21/libraries/linux/libphidget LIBPHIDGET_DEPENDENCIES = libusb
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
PATCH 40/42 libphidget: bump to version 2.1.8.20170607
Hello,
Quoted 7 lines · Fabrice Fontaine
Add hash for license file
Signed-off-by Fabrice Fontaine <[email protected]>--- package/libphidget/libphidget.hash | 3 ++- package/libphidget/libphidget.mk | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
This patch 40/42 looks like a mistake, and was not in patchwork, so I supposed you removed it from patchwork. Correct ?
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
PATCH 40/42 libphidget: bump to version 2.1.8.20170607
Dear Thomas,
2018-05-20 18:46 GMT+02:00 Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]>:
Quoted 5 lines
Hello,
Quoted 2 lines · Fabrice Fontaine
Add hash for license file
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Signed-off-by Fabrice Fontaine <[email protected]>--- package/libphidget/libphidget.hash | 3 ++- package/libphidget/libphidget.mk | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)This patch 40/42 looks like a mistake, and was not in patchwork, so I supposed you removed it from patchwork. Correct ?
Yes, this was a mistake, I set it as unapplicable in patchwork.
Quoted 7 lines
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Best Regards,
Fabrice
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20180520/02f26236/attachment.html>