drivers; add DM_NO_OF Kconfig option
PATCH v2 1/2 drivers; add DM_NO_OF Kconfig option
To be able to build spi driver with DM support, a new config option has been introduced (DM_NO_OF) since m68k architecture does not support fdt.
---
Changes from v1:
- split into 2 patches
--- arch/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/core/Kconfig | 4 ++++ drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c | 12 +++++++----- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
arch/Kconfig +1 -0
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ config M68K select HAVE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC select SYS_BOOT_GET_CMDLINE select SYS_BOOT_GET_KBD + select DM_NO_OF config MICROBLAZE bool "MicroBlaze architecture"
drivers/core/Kconfig +4 -0
@@ -244,4 +244,8 @@ config DM_DEV_READ_INLINE bool default y if !OF_LIVE +config DM_NO_OF + bool + default n + endmenu
drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c +7 -5
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ int spi_xfer(struct spi_slave *slave, unsigned int bitlen,return dm_spi_xfer (slave->dev, bitlen, dout, din, flags); } -#if !CONFIG_IS_ENABLED (OF_PLATDATA ) +#if !CONFIG_IS_ENABLED (OF_PLATDATA ) && !defined(CONFIG_DM_NO_OF )static int spi_child_post_bind (struct udevice *dev) {struct dm_spi_slave_platdata *plat =dev_get_parent_platdata (dev);
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static int spi_child_post_bind(struct udevice *dev)static int spi_post_probe (struct udevice *bus) { -#if !CONFIG_IS_ENABLED (OF_PLATDATA ) +#if !CONFIG_IS_ENABLED (OF_PLATDATA ) && !defined(CONFIG_DM_NO_OF )struct dm_spi_bus *spi =dev_get_uclass_priv (bus); spi->max_hz =dev_read_u32_default (bus,"spi-max-frequency" ,0 );
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ int spi_get_bus_and_cs(int busnum, int cs, int speed, int mode,bool created = false;int ret; -#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED (OF_PLATDATA ) +#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED (OF_PLATDATA ) || defined(CONFIG_DM_NO_OF ) ret =uclass_first_device_err (UCLASS_SPI , &bus);#else ret =uclass_get_device_by_seq (UCLASS_SPI , busnum, &bus);
@@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ int spi_get_bus_and_cs(int busnum, int cs, int speed, int mode,printf ("Invalid bus %d (err=%d)\n" , busnum, ret);return ret; } + ret =spi_find_chip_select (bus, cs, &dev);/*
@@ -321,6 +322,7 @@ int spi_get_bus_and_cs(int busnum, int cs, int speed, int mode, } plat =dev_get_parent_platdata (dev); +if (!speed) { speed = plat->max_hz; mode = plat->mode;
@@ -427,7 +429,7 @@ UCLASS_DRIVER(spi) = { .id = UCLASS_SPI, .name = "spi", .flags = DM_UC_FLAG_SEQ_ALIAS, -#if !CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OF_PLATDATA) +#if !CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OF_PLATDATA) && !defined(CONFIG_DM_NO_OF) .post_bind = dm_scan_fdt_dev, #endif .post_probe = spi_post_probe,
@@ -436,7 +438,7 @@ UCLASS_DRIVER(spi) = { .per_child_auto_alloc_size = sizeof(struct spi_slave), .per_child_platdata_auto_alloc_size = sizeof(struct dm_spi_slave_platdata), -#if !CONFIG_IS_ENABLED (OF_PLATDATA ) +#if !CONFIG_IS_ENABLED (OF_PLATDATA ) && !defined(CONFIG_DM_NO_OF ) .child_post_bind = spi_child_post_bind,#endif };
Signature · 1 line
2.17.0
PATCH v2 1/2 drivers; add DM_NO_OF Kconfig option
Hi Angelo,
Quoted 8 lines · Angelo Dureghello
To be able to build spi driver with DM support, a new config option has been introduced (
DM_NO_OF) since m68k architecture does not support fdt.---
Changes from v1:
- split into 2 patches
Quoted 7 lines
Signed-off-by Angelo Dureghello <[email protected]>--- arch/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/core/Kconfig | 4 ++++ drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c | 12 +++++++----- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Is it possible to use SPL_OF_PLATDATA instead?
How come m68k cannot use device tree?
Regards,
Simon
PATCH v2 1/2 drivers; add DM_NO_OF Kconfig option
Hi Simon,
Quoted 19 lines · Simon Glass
Hi Angelo,
Quoted 8 lines · Angelo Dureghello
To be able to build spi driver with DM support, a new config option has been introduced (
DM_NO_OF) since m68k architecture does not support fdt.---
Changes from v1:
- split into 2 patchesQuoted 7 lines
Signed-off-by Angelo Dureghello <[email protected]>--- arch/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/core/Kconfig | 4 ++++ drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c | 12 +++++++----- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Quoted 2 lines
Is it possible to use
SPL_OF_PLATDATAinstead?
I have seen that setting, but my understanding is that SPL_OF_PLATDATA ws made for a different purpose, and also, i tried to use it, but cannot select it from menuconfig.
Quoted 2 lines
How come m68k cannot use device tree?
There was never any devicetree implementation, probably becouse it is missing on Linux too.
Quoted 2 lines
Regards,
Simon
Regards,
Angelo
PATCH v2 1/2 drivers; add DM_NO_OF Kconfig option
+Tom
Hi Angelo,
Quoted 24 lines · Angelo Dureghello
Hi Simon,
Quoted 19 lines · Simon Glass
Hi Angelo,
Quoted 8 lines · Angelo Dureghello
To be able to build spi driver with DM support, a new config option has been introduced (
DM_NO_OF) since m68k architecture does not support fdt.---
Changes from v1:
- split into 2 patchesQuoted 7 lines
Signed-off-by Angelo Dureghello <[email protected]>--- arch/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/core/Kconfig | 4 ++++ drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c | 12 +++++++----- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)Quoted 2 lines
Is it possible to use
SPL_OF_PLATDATAinstead?
Quoted 8 lines
I have seen that setting, but my understanding is that
SPL_OF_PLATDATAws made for a different purpose, and also, i tried to use it, but cannot select it from menuconfig.Quoted 2 lines
How come m68k cannot use device tree?
There was never any devicetree implementation, probably becouse it is missing on Linux too.
It is a real shame that we can't do better than that.
I've added Tom in for comment as I'm not sure what is best here.
Regards,
Simon
PATCH v2 1/2 drivers; add DM_NO_OF Kconfig option
Quoted 33 lines · Simon Glass
+Tom
Hi Angelo,
Quoted 28 lines · Angelo Dureghello
Hi Simon,
Quoted 19 lines · Simon Glass
Hi Angelo,
Quoted 8 lines · Angelo Dureghello
To be able to build spi driver with DM support, a new config option has been introduced (
DM_NO_OF) since m68k architecture does not support fdt.---
Changes from v1:
- split into 2 patchesQuoted 7 lines
Signed-off-by Angelo Dureghello <[email protected]>--- arch/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/core/Kconfig | 4 ++++ drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c | 12 +++++++----- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)Quoted 2 lines
Is it possible to use
SPL_OF_PLATDATAinstead?I have seen that setting, but my understanding is that
SPL_OF_PLATDATAws made for a different purpose, and also, i tried to use it, but cannot select it from menuconfig.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
How come m68k cannot use device tree?
There was never any devicetree implementation, probably becouse it is missing on Linux too.
It is a real shame that we can't do better than that.
I've added Tom in for comment as I'm not sure what is best here.
Yeah, I think as sandbox shows, if/when we don't have to worry about also Linux dts files, it's not a lot of work to populate up what's required for just U-Boot, so long as we have the run-time space. And if not, that's what OF_PLATDATA is for.
Signature · 8 lines
Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20180528/06f74f14/attachment.sig>
PATCH v2 1/2 drivers; add DM_NO_OF Kconfig option
Hi,
Quoted 39 lines · Tom Rini
Quoted 38 lines · Simon Glass
+Tom
Hi Angelo,
Quoted 32 lines · Angelo Dureghello
Hi Simon,
Quoted 19 lines · Simon Glass
Hi Angelo,
Quoted 8 lines · Angelo Dureghello
To be able to build spi driver with DM support, a new config option has been introduced (
DM_NO_OF) since m68k architecture does not support fdt.---
Changes from v1:
- split into 2 patchesQuoted 7 lines
Signed-off-by Angelo Dureghello <[email protected]>--- arch/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/core/Kconfig | 4 ++++ drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c | 12 +++++++----- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)Quoted 2 lines
Is it possible to use
SPL_OF_PLATDATAinstead?I have seen that setting, but my understanding is that
SPL_OF_PLATDATAws made for a different purpose, and also, i tried to use it, but cannot select it from menuconfig.Quoted 2 lines
How come m68k cannot use device tree?
There was never any devicetree implementation, probably becouse it is missing on Linux too.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 3 lines
It is a real shame that we can't do better than that.
I've added Tom in for comment as I'm not sure what is best here.
Yeah, I think as sandbox shows, if/when we don't have to worry about also Linux dts files, it's not a lot of work to populate up what's required for just U-Boot, so long as we have the run-time space. And if not, that's what
OF_PLATDATAis for.
Ok, so i retry the OF_PLATDATA way, i probably missed something there. About fdt addition, i keep that task in a TO DO list for now.
Thanks,
Angelo
Quoted 2 lines
Signature · 1 line
Tom
PATCH v2 1/2 drivers; add DM_NO_OF Kconfig option
In reply to Tom RiniHi Tom and Simon,
thanks for the support.
Quoted 39 lines · Tom Rini
Quoted 38 lines · Simon Glass
+Tom
Hi Angelo,
Quoted 32 lines · Angelo Dureghello
Hi Simon,
Quoted 19 lines · Simon Glass
Hi Angelo,
Quoted 8 lines · Angelo Dureghello
To be able to build spi driver with DM support, a new config option has been introduced (
DM_NO_OF) since m68k architecture does not support fdt.---
Changes from v1:
- split into 2 patchesQuoted 7 lines
Signed-off-by Angelo Dureghello <[email protected]>--- arch/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/core/Kconfig | 4 ++++ drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c | 12 +++++++----- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)Quoted 2 lines
Is it possible to use
SPL_OF_PLATDATAinstead?I have seen that setting, but my understanding is that
SPL_OF_PLATDATAws made for a different purpose, and also, i tried to use it, but cannot select it from menuconfig.Quoted 2 lines
How come m68k cannot use device tree?
There was never any devicetree implementation, probably becouse it is missing on Linux too.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 3 lines
It is a real shame that we can't do better than that.
I've added Tom in for comment as I'm not sure what is best here.
Yeah, I think as sandbox shows, if/when we don't have to worry about also Linux dts files, it's not a lot of work to populate up what's required for just U-Boot, so long as we have the run-time space. And if not, that's what
OF_PLATDATAis for.
About SPL_OF_PLATDATA, do you think i can change it to a more generic OF_PLATDATA, or GENERIC_OF_PLATDATA not dependant from SPL (i am not using SPL) ?
I also need to add "select SUPPORT_OF_CONTROL" for m68k arch.
Let me know if the above is ok, otherwise i start to work for the devicetree option.
Quoted 2 lines
Signature · 1 line
Tom
Regards,
Angelo
PATCH v2 1/2 drivers; add DM_NO_OF Kconfig option
Hi Angelo,
Quoted 54 lines · Angelo Dureghello
Hi Tom and Simon,
thanks for the support.
Quoted 39 lines · Tom Rini
Quoted 38 lines · Simon Glass
+Tom
Hi Angelo,
Quoted 32 lines · Angelo Dureghello
Hi Simon,
Quoted 19 lines · Simon Glass
Hi Angelo,
Quoted 8 lines · Angelo Dureghello
To be able to build spi driver with DM support, a new config option has been introduced (
DM_NO_OF) since m68k architecture does not support fdt.---
Changes from v1:
- split into 2 patchesQuoted 7 lines
Signed-off-by Angelo Dureghello <[email protected]>--- arch/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/core/Kconfig | 4 ++++ drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c | 12 +++++++----- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)Quoted 2 lines
Is it possible to use
SPL_OF_PLATDATAinstead?I have seen that setting, but my understanding is that
SPL_OF_PLATDATAws made for a different purpose, and also, i tried to use it, but cannot select it from menuconfig.Quoted 2 lines
How come m68k cannot use device tree?
There was never any devicetree implementation, probably becouse it is missing on Linux too.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 3 lines
It is a real shame that we can't do better than that.
I've added Tom in for comment as I'm not sure what is best here.
Yeah, I think as sandbox shows, if/when we don't have to worry about also Linux dts files, it's not a lot of work to populate up what's required for just U-Boot, so long as we have the run-time space. And if not, that's what
OF_PLATDATAis for.
Quoted 7 lines
About
SPL_OF_PLATDATA, do you think i can change it to a more genericOF_PLATDATA, orGENERIC_OF_PLATDATAnot dependant from SPL (i am not using SPL) ?
I also need to add "selectSUPPORT_OF_CONTROL" for m68k arch.Let me know if the above is ok, otherwise i start to work for the devicetree option.
I am nervous about it since it opens the door to people using OF_PLATDATA in U-Boot proper, which I was hoping to avoid. If you look at the code you will see that it is somewhat ugly. Fine for SPL since it reduces the size so much, but the size advantage would be less in U-Boot (since we have libfdt anyway).
So my preference would be to add device tree. But it's not the end of the world.
What do you think, Tom?
Regards,
Simon
PATCH v2 1/2 drivers; add DM_NO_OF Kconfig option
In reply to Angelo DureghelloQuoted 54 lines · Angelo Dureghello
Hi Tom and Simon,
thanks for the support.
Quoted 39 lines · Tom Rini
Quoted 38 lines · Simon Glass
+Tom
Hi Angelo,
Quoted 32 lines · Angelo Dureghello
Hi Simon,
Quoted 19 lines · Simon Glass
Hi Angelo,
Quoted 8 lines · Angelo Dureghello
To be able to build spi driver with DM support, a new config option has been introduced (
DM_NO_OF) since m68k architecture does not support fdt.---
Changes from v1:
- split into 2 patchesQuoted 7 lines
Signed-off-by Angelo Dureghello <[email protected]>--- arch/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/core/Kconfig | 4 ++++ drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c | 12 +++++++----- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)Quoted 2 lines
Is it possible to use
SPL_OF_PLATDATAinstead?I have seen that setting, but my understanding is that
SPL_OF_PLATDATAws made for a different purpose, and also, i tried to use it, but cannot select it from menuconfig.Quoted 2 lines
How come m68k cannot use device tree?
There was never any devicetree implementation, probably becouse it is missing on Linux too.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 3 lines
It is a real shame that we can't do better than that.
I've added Tom in for comment as I'm not sure what is best here.
Yeah, I think as sandbox shows, if/when we don't have to worry about also Linux dts files, it's not a lot of work to populate up what's required for just U-Boot, so long as we have the run-time space. And if not, that's what
OF_PLATDATAis for.
Quoted 7 lines
About
SPL_OF_PLATDATA, do you think i can change it to a more genericOF_PLATDATA, orGENERIC_OF_PLATDATAnot dependant from SPL (i am not using SPL) ?
I also need to add "selectSUPPORT_OF_CONTROL" for m68k arch.Let me know if the above is ok, otherwise i start to work for the devicetree option.
Really, we should probably go the device tree path first and see where that gets us. I think it'll be less work in the end. Thanks!
Signature · 8 lines
Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20180531/ddfb5cac/attachment.sig>