fpu_helper.c: fix setting FPSCR[FI] bit
PATCH 1/1 fpu_helper.c: fix setting FPSCR[FI] bit
The FPSCR[FI] bit indicates if the last floating point instruction had a result that was rounded. Each consecutive floating point instruction is suppose to set this bit to the correct value. What currently happens is this bit is not set as often as it should be. I have verified that this is the behavior of a real PowerPC 950. This patch fixes that problem by deciding to set this bit after each floating point instruction.
https://www.pdfdrive.net/powerpc-microprocessor-family-the-programming-environments-for-32-e3087633.html
Page 63 in table 2-4 is where the description of this bit can be found.
--- target/ppc/fpu_helper.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
target/ppc/fpu_helper.c +8 -0
@@ -274,6 +274,7 @@ static inline void float_inexact_excp(CPUPPCState *env) {CPUState *cs =CPU (ppc_env_get_cpu (env)); + env->fpscr |=1 <<FPSCR_FI ; env->fpscr |=1 <<FPSCR_XX ;/* Update the floating-point exception summary */ env->fpscr |=FP_FX ;
@@ -505,6 +506,7 @@ static void do_float_check_status(CPUPPCState *env, uintptr_t raddr) {CPUState *cs =CPU (ppc_env_get_cpu (env));int status =get_float_exception_flags (&env->fp_status); +bool inexact_happened = false;if (status & float_flag_divbyzero) {float_zero_divide_excp (env, raddr);
@@ -514,6 +516,12 @@ static void do_float_check_status(CPUPPCState *env, uintptr_t raddr)float_underflow_excp (env); }else if (status & float_flag_inexact) {float_inexact_excp (env); + inexact_happened = true; + } + +/* if the inexact flag was not set */ +if (inexact_happened == false) { + env->fpscr &= ~(1 <<FPSCR_FI );/* clear the FPSCR[FI] bit */ } if (cs->exception_index == POWERPC_EXCP_PROGRAM &&
Signature · 1 line
2.14.3 (Apple Git-98)
Quoted 6 lines · John Arbuckle
The FPSCR[FI] bit indicates if the last floating point instruction had a result that was rounded. Each consecutive floating point instruction is suppose to set this bit to the correct value. What currently happens is this bit is not set as often as it should be. I have verified that this is the behavior of a real PowerPC 950. This patch fixes that problem by deciding to set this bit after each floating point instruction.
https://www.pdfdrive.net/powerpc-microprocessor-family-the-programming-environments-for-32-e3087633.html
Page 63 in table 2-4 is where the description of this bit can be found.Signed-off-by John Arbuckle <[email protected]>
I'm not sure it's the nicest way to fix it, but the existing code is pretty horrible, so, whatever.
It looks correct, so, applied to ppc-for-3.0.
Quoted 37 lines
--- target/ppc/fpu_helper.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)target/ppc/fpu_helper.c +8
-0@@ -274,6 +274,7 @@ static inline void float_inexact_excp(CPUPPCState *env) {CPUState *cs =CPU (ppc_env_get_cpu (env)); + env->fpscr |=1 <<FPSCR_FI ; env->fpscr |=1 <<FPSCR_XX ;/* Update the floating-point exception summary */ env->fpscr |=FP_FX ;@@ -505,6 +506,7 @@ static void do_float_check_status(CPUPPCState *env, uintptr_t raddr) {CPUState *cs =CPU (ppc_env_get_cpu (env));int status =get_float_exception_flags (&env->fp_status); +bool inexact_happened = false;if (status & float_flag_divbyzero) {float_zero_divide_excp (env, raddr);@@ -514,6 +516,12 @@ static void do_float_check_status(CPUPPCState *env, uintptr_t raddr)float_underflow_excp (env); }else if (status & float_flag_inexact) {float_inexact_excp (env); + inexact_happened = true; + } + +/* if the inexact flag was not set */ +if (inexact_happened == false) { + env->fpscr &= ~(1 <<FPSCR_FI );/* clear the FPSCR[FI] bit */ } if (cs->exception_index == POWERPC_EXCP_PROGRAM &&
Signature · 4 lines
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson