usb-storage: Add rerror/werror properties
PATCH 1/1 usb-storage: Add rerror/werror properties
The error handling policy was traditionally set with -drive, but with -blockdev it is no longer possible to set frontend options. scsi-disk (and other block devices) have long supported qdev properties to configure the error handling policy, so let's add these options to usb-storage as well and just forward them to the internal scsi-disk instance.
--- include/hw/scsi/scsi.h | 2 ++ hw/scsi/scsi-bus.c | 11 ++++++++++- hw/usb/dev-storage.c | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
include/hw/scsi/scsi.h +2 -0
@@ -154,6 +154,8 @@ static inline SCSIBus *scsi_bus_from_device(SCSIDevice *d)SCSIDevice *scsi_bus_legacy_add_drive (SCSIBus *bus,BlockBackend *blk,int unit,bool removable,int bootindex,bool share_rw, +BlockdevOnError rerror, +BlockdevOnError werror,const char *serial,Error **errp);void scsi_bus_legacy_handle_cmdline (SCSIBus *bus);void scsi_legacy_handle_cmdline (void );
hw/scsi/scsi-bus.c +10 -1
@@ -226,6 +226,8 @@ static void scsi_qdev_unrealize(DeviceState *qdev, Error **errp)SCSIDevice *scsi_bus_legacy_add_drive (SCSIBus *bus,BlockBackend *blk,int unit,bool removable,int bootindex,bool share_rw, +BlockdevOnError rerror, +BlockdevOnError werror,const char *serial,Error **errp) {const char *driver;
@@ -262,6 +264,10 @@ SCSIDevice *scsi_bus_legacy_add_drive(SCSIBus *bus, BlockBackend *blk,object_unparent (OBJECT (dev));return NULL ; } + +qdev_prop_set_enum (dev,"rerror" , rerror); +qdev_prop_set_enum (dev,"werror" , werror); +object_property_set_bool (OBJECT (dev), true,"realized" , &err);if (err !=NULL ) {error_propagate (errp, err);
@@ -285,7 +291,10 @@ void scsi_bus_legacy_handle_cmdline(SCSIBus *bus) }qemu_opts_loc_restore (dinfo->opts);scsi_bus_legacy_add_drive (bus,blk_by_legacy_dinfo (dinfo), - unit, false,-1 , false,NULL , &error_fatal); + unit, false,-1 , false, +BLOCKDEV_ON_ERROR_AUTO , +BLOCKDEV_ON_ERROR_AUTO , +NULL , &error_fatal); }loc_pop (&loc); }
hw/usb/dev-storage.c +2 -0
@@ -625,6 +625,7 @@ static void usb_msd_storage_realize(USBDevice *dev, Error **errp) &usb_msd_scsi_info_storage, NULL); scsi_dev =scsi_bus_legacy_add_drive (&s->bus, blk,0 , !!s->removable, s->conf.bootindex, s->conf.share_rw, + s->conf.rerror, s->conf.werror, dev->serial, errp);blk_unref (blk);
@@ -671,6 +672,7 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_usb_msd = {static Property msd_properties[] = {DEFINE_BLOCK_PROPERTIES (MSDState, conf), +DEFINE_BLOCK_ERROR_PROPERTIES (MSDState, conf),DEFINE_PROP_BIT ("removable" , MSDState, removable,0 , false),DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST (), };
Signature · 1 line
2.13.6
Quoted 8 lines · Kevin Wolf
The error handling policy was traditionally set with -drive, but with -blockdev it is no longer possible to set frontend options. scsi-disk (and other block devices) have long supported qdev properties to configure the error handling policy, so let's add these options to usb-storage as well and just forward them to the internal scsi-disk instance.
Signed-off-by Kevin Wolf <[email protected]>
Let's see whether I remember / figure out how this stuff works.
Not all devices support error handling policy, but scsi-disk does.
The preferred way to configure error handling policy is with qdev properties rerror, werror. blkconf_apply_backend_options() propagates them to the associated BlockBackend.
The outmoded way is with -drive parameters rerror, werror. blockdev_init() propagates them to the BlockBackend.
If you use both ways, qdev properties win.
usb-storage is a hack: it tries to look like a block device, but it's really a SCSI controller that can serve only a single scsi-disk device, which it creates automatically.
We want to deprecate -drive. We also want to deprecate usb-storage, but I guess we're still not ready for that (it's a complicated story).
To deprecate -drive without also deprecating usb-storage, we need to preserve features.
The outmoded way works with usb-storage: the automatically created scsi-disk is associated with the BlockBackend that got its error handling policy from -drive.
The preferred way doesn't, because usb-storage lacks the qdev properties. This patch adds them.
Kind of sad, but it's either that or deprecating usb-storage.
Patch looks good to me, thus
Feel free to work whatever parts of my ramblings you find useful into your commit message.
Quoted 5 lines · Markus Armbruster
We also want to deprecate usb-storage, but
I guess we're still not ready for that (it's a complicated story).To deprecate -drive without also deprecating usb-storage, we need to preserve features.
Patch looks good to me too, but indeed why can't we deprecate usb-storage in favor of usb-bot + scsi-disk?
Thanks,
Paolo
Quoted 9 lines · Paolo Bonzini
Quoted 5 lines · Markus Armbruster
We also want to deprecate usb-storage, but
I guess we're still not ready for that (it's a complicated story).To deprecate -drive without also deprecating usb-storage, we need to preserve features.
Patch looks good to me too, but indeed why can't we deprecate usb-storage in favor of usb-bot + scsi-disk?
Presumably the migration state of usb-storage is different from the migration state of usb-bot + scsi-disk, so not a case where libvirt could silently switch from one to the other. It would need to be an explicit config change by apps/users.
Regards,
Daniel
Signature · 3 lines
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
Quoted 11 lines · Daniel P. Berrangé
Quoted 9 lines · Paolo Bonzini
Quoted 5 lines · Markus Armbruster
We also want to deprecate usb-storage, but
I guess we're still not ready for that (it's a complicated story).To deprecate -drive without also deprecating usb-storage, we need to preserve features.
Patch looks good to me too, but indeed why can't we deprecate usb-storage in favor of usb-bot + scsi-disk?
Quoted 6 lines
Presumably the migration state of usb-storage is different from the migration state of usb-bot + scsi-disk, so not a case where libvirt could silently switch from one to the other. It would need to be an explicit config change by apps/users.
From a quick test, migrating
qemu-kvm \
-drive if=none,id=usb,file=$HOME/chipsec.img,snapshot=on \
-usb -device usb-storage,drive=usb -M q35into
qemu-kvm \
-drive if=none,id=usb,file=$HOME/chipsec.img,snapshot=on \
-usb -device usb-bot -device scsi-disk,drive=usb -M q35seems to work. Both of them indeed use vmstate_usb_msd for migration.
Paolo
Gerd Hoffmann
Reviewed-by Markus ArmbrusterQuoted 9 lines · Paolo Bonzini
Quoted 5 lines · Markus Armbruster
We also want to deprecate usb-storage, but
I guess we're still not ready for that (it's a complicated story).To deprecate -drive without also deprecating usb-storage, we need to preserve features.
Patch looks good to me too, but indeed why can't we deprecate usb-storage in favor of usb-bot + scsi-disk?
I think we can. One blocking issue was hotplug support, but that got fixed a while ago, and I'm not aware of any other issue ...
cheers,
Gerd
commit b78ecd0998094a8b7e0f14c4888f3a6b525d14ff
Author: Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]> Date: Wed Jun 15 11:46:58 2016 +0200
usb-bot: hotplug support
This patch marks usb-bot as hot-pluggable device, makes attached property settable and turns off auto-attach in case the device was hotplugged.
Hot-plugging a usb-bot device with one or more scsi devices can be done this way now:
(1) device-add usb-bot,id=foo
(2) device-add scsi-{hd,cd},bus=foo.0,lun=0 (2b) optionally add more devices (luns 0 ... 15).
(3) qom-set foo.attached = true
Message-id: [email protected]