wireless: mark expected switch fall-throughs
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 wireless: mark expected switch fall-throughs
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
Warning level 2 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2
--- net/wireless/chan.c | 2 ++ net/wireless/nl80211.c | 9 +++++++++ net/wireless/wext-compat.c | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
net/wireless/chan.c +2 -0
@@ -747,6 +747,7 @@ bool cfg80211_chandef_usable(struct wiphy *wiphy,case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20 :if (!ht_cap->ht_supported)return false; +/* else: fall through */ case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20_NOHT : prohibited_flags |=IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_20MHZ ; width =20 ;
@@ -769,6 +770,7 @@ bool cfg80211_chandef_usable(struct wiphy *wiphy, cap = vht_cap->cap &IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_MASK ;if (cap !=IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_160_80PLUS80MHZ )return false; +/* else: fall through */ case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_80 :if (!vht_cap->vht_supported)return false;
net/wireless/nl80211.c +9 -0
@@ -1676,6 +1676,7 @@ static int nl80211_send_wiphy(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev, state->split_start++;if (state->split)break ; +/* else: fall through */ case 1 : if (nla_put(msg, NL80211_ATTR_CIPHER_SUITES, sizeof(u32) * rdev->wiphy.n_cipher_suites,
@@ -1722,6 +1723,7 @@ static int nl80211_send_wiphy(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev, state->split_start++;if (state->split)break ; +/* else: fall through */ case 2 :if (nl80211_put_iftypes (msg,NL80211_ATTR_SUPPORTED_IFTYPES , rdev->wiphy.interface_modes))
@@ -1729,6 +1731,7 @@ static int nl80211_send_wiphy(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev, state->split_start++;if (state->split)break ; +/* else: fall through */ case 3 : nl_bands =nla_nest_start (msg,NL80211_ATTR_WIPHY_BANDS );if (!nl_bands)
@@ -1754,6 +1757,7 @@ static int nl80211_send_wiphy(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev, state->chan_start++;if (state->split)break ; +/* else: fall through */ default :/* add frequencies */ nl_freqs = nla_nest_start(
@@ -1807,6 +1811,7 @@ static int nl80211_send_wiphy(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev, state->split_start++;if (state->split)break ; +/* else: fall through */ case 4 : nl_cmds =nla_nest_start (msg,NL80211_ATTR_SUPPORTED_COMMANDS );if (!nl_cmds)
@@ -1833,6 +1838,7 @@ static int nl80211_send_wiphy(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev, state->split_start++;if (state->split)break ; +/* else: fall through */ case 5 : if (rdev->ops->remain_on_channel && (rdev->wiphy.flags & WIPHY_FLAG_HAS_REMAIN_ON_CHANNEL) &&
@@ -1850,6 +1856,7 @@ static int nl80211_send_wiphy(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev, state->split_start++;if (state->split)break ; +/* else: fall through */ case 6 :#ifdef CONFIG_PM if (nl80211_send_wowlan (msg, rdev, state->split))
@@ -1872,6 +1879,7 @@ static int nl80211_send_wiphy(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev, state->split_start++;if (state->split)break ; +/* else: fall through */ case 8 :if ((rdev->wiphy.flags &WIPHY_FLAG_HAVE_AP_SME ) && nla_put_u32(msg, NL80211_ATTR_DEVICE_AP_SME,
@@ -4466,6 +4474,7 @@ static int parse_station_flags(struct genl_info *info, params->sta_flags_mask =BIT (NL80211_STA_FLAG_AUTHENTICATED ) |BIT (NL80211_STA_FLAG_MFP ) |BIT (NL80211_STA_FLAG_AUTHORIZED ); +/* fall through */ default :return -EINVAL ; }
net/wireless/wext-compat.c +2 -0
@@ -1333,6 +1333,7 @@ static struct iw_statistics *cfg80211_wireless_stats(struct net_device *dev) wstats.qual.qual = sig +110 ;break ; } +/* else: fall through */ case CFG80211_SIGNAL_TYPE_UNSPEC :if (sinfo.filled &BIT_ULL (NL80211_STA_INFO_SIGNAL )) { wstats.qual.updated |=IW_QUAL_LEVEL_UPDATED ;
@@ -1341,6 +1342,7 @@ static struct iw_statistics *cfg80211_wireless_stats(struct net_device *dev) wstats.qual.qual = sinfo.signal;break ; } +/* else: fall through */ default : wstats.qual.updated |=IW_QUAL_LEVEL_INVALID ; wstats.qual.updated |=IW_QUAL_QUAL_INVALID ;
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
Johannes Berg
maintainerHi Gustavo,
Quoted 2 lines
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
You dropped the remark saying you didn't review them, but did you?
net/wireless/chan.c bool cfg80211_chandef_usable(struct wiphy *wiphy, · line 750
Quoted 4 lines
net/wireless/chan.c +1
-0case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20 :if (!ht_cap->ht_supported)return false; +/* else: fall through */
What's the point in else:?
We also don't necessarily write
if (!...)
return false;
else
do_something();
but rather
if (!...)
return false;do_something().
I think I'd prefer without the "else:"
johannes
Quoted 7 lines · Johannes Berg
Hi Gustavo,
Quoted 2 lines
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
You dropped the remark saying you didn't review them, but did you?
I'll add it in v2.
Quoted 14 lines
net/wireless/chan.c bool cfg80211_chandef_usable(struct wiphy *wiphy, · line 750
Quoted 4 lines
net/wireless/chan.c +1
-0case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20 :if (!ht_cap->ht_supported)return false; +/* else: fall through */ What's the point in else:?
We also don't necessarily write
if (!...)
return false;
else
do_something();
Quoted 8 lines
but rather
if (!...)
return false;do_something().I think I'd prefer without the "else:"
Sure thing. I'll change this in v2.
I'll send v2 shortly.
Thanks for the feedback.
--
Gustavo