daemonize: Flush stdio on exit
PATCH 1/1 daemonize: Flush stdio on exit
In spite of a comment suggesting otherwise, os._exit() does not flush buffered output from file descriptors before exiting the process like os.exit() does. This means that any un-flushed output is lost in the daemon process, in particular the traceback from any thrown exceptions, making debugging exceptions in the daemon quite difficult.
The solution is to flush stdout and stderr before exiting.
--- bitbake/lib/bb/daemonize.py | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
bitbake/lib/bb/daemonize.py +7 -2
@@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ def createDaemon(function, logfile): # exit() or _exit()? # _exit is like exit(), but it doesn't call any functions registered # with atexit (and on_exit) or any registered signal handlers. It also - # closes any open file descriptors. Using exit() may cause all stdio - # streams to be flushed twice and any temporary files may be unexpectedly + # closes any open file descriptors, but doesn't flush any buffered output. + # Using exit() may cause all any temporary files to be unexpectedly # removed. It's therefore recommended that child branches of a fork() # and the parent branch(es) of a daemon use _exit(). os._exit(0)
@@ -79,4 +79,9 @@ def createDaemon(function, logfile): traceback.print_exc() finally: bb.event.print_ui_queue() + # os._exit() doesn't flush open files like os.exit() does. Manually flush + # stdout and stderr so that any logging output will be seen, particularly + # exception tracebacks. + sys.stdout.flush() + sys.stderr.flush() os._exit(0)
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
Quoted 30 lines · Joshua Watt
In spite of a comment suggesting otherwise,
os._exit()does not flush buffered output from file descriptors before exiting the process likeos.exit()does. This means that any un-flushed output is lost in the daemon process, in particular the traceback from any thrown exceptions, making debugging exceptions in the daemon quite difficult.The solution is to flush stdout and stderr before exiting.
Signed-off-by Joshua Watt <[email protected]>--- bitbake/lib/bb/daemonize.py | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)bitbake/lib/bb/daemonize.py +2
-2@@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ def createDaemon(function, logfile): # exit() or _exit()? # _exit is like exit(), but it doesn't call any functions registered # with atexit (and on_exit) or any registered signal handlers. It also - # closes any open file descriptors. Using exit() may cause all stdio - # streams to be flushed twice and any temporary files may be unexpectedly + # closes any open file descriptors, but doesn't flush any buffered output. + # Using exit() may cause all any temporary files to be unexpectedly # removed. It's therefore recommended that child branches of a fork() # and the parent branch(es) of a daemon use _exit(). os._exit(0)
bitbake/lib/bb/daemonize.py def createDaemon(function, logfile): · line 87
Quoted 9 lines
bitbake/lib/bb/daemonize.py +5
-0@@ -79,4 +79,9 @@ def createDaemon(function, logfile): traceback.print_exc() finally: bb.event.print_ui_queue() + # os._exit() doesn't flush open files like os.exit() does. Manually flush + # stdout and stderr so that any logging output will be seen, particularly + # exception tracebacks. + sys.stdout.flush() + sys.stderr.flush() os._exit(0)
Well, that's of course better than not getting the output, but there's then the issue of double printing: The intermediate child does _exit(), but the grandparent may have had stuff in the stdio buffers before the very first fork(), and that content would be inherited down to the grandchild. So I think you should (also) explicitly flush stdout and stderr before the first fork().
Signature · 8 lines
Rasmus Villemoes Software Developer Prevas A/S Hedeager 3 DK-8200 Aarhus N +45 51210274 [email protected] www.prevas.dk
Quoted 53 lines · Rasmus Villemoes
Quoted 52 lines · Joshua Watt
In spite of a comment suggesting otherwise,
os._exit()does not flush
buffered output from file descriptors before exiting the process likeos.exit()does. This means that any un-flushed output is lost in the
daemon process, in particular the traceback from any thrown exceptions,
making debugging exceptions in the daemon quite difficult.The solution is to flush stdout and stderr before exiting.
Signed-off-by Joshua Watt <[email protected]>--- bitbake/lib/bb/daemonize.py | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)bitbake/lib/bb/daemonize.py +0
-0@@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ def createDaemon(function, logfile): # exit() or _exit()? # _exit is like exit(), but it doesn't call anyfunctions registered
# with atexit (and on_exit) or any registered signal handlers. It also - # closes any open file descriptors. Using exit() may cause all stdio - # streams to be flushed twice and any temporary files may be unexpectedly + # closes any open file descriptors, but doesn't flush any buffered output. + # Using exit() may cause all any temporary files to be unexpectedly # removed. It's therefore recommended that child branches of a fork() # and the parent branch(es) of a daemon use _exit(). os._exit(0)bitbake/lib/bb/daemonize.py +1
-0@@ -79,4 +79,9 @@ def createDaemon(function, logfile): traceback.print_exc() finally: bb.event.print_ui_queue() + # os._exit() doesn't flush open files like os.exit() does.Manually flush
+ # stdout and stderr so that any logging output will be
seen, particularlybitbake/lib/bb/daemonize.py +3
-0+ # exception tracebacks. + sys.stdout.flush() + sys.stderr.flush() os._exit(0)
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
Well, that's of course better than not getting the output, but there's then the issue of double printing: The intermediate child does
_exit(), but the grandparent may have had stuff in the stdio buffers before the very firstfork(), and that content would be inherited down to the grandchild. So I think you should (also) explicitly flush stdout and stderr before the firstfork().
You're correct, we should do that. I was thinking we did flush things before forking but looking at the code I'm thinking of the fork() call in bitbake-worker, not the one in daemonize.py.
I'd happily take a patch if someone wants to work one up!
Cheers,
Richard
Quoted 8 lines · Richard Purdie
Quoted 6 lines · Rasmus Villemoes
Well, that's of course better than not getting the output, but there's then the issue of double printing: The intermediate child does
_exit(), but the grandparent may have had stuff in the stdio buffers before the very firstfork(), and that content would be inherited down to the grandchild. So I think you should (also) explicitly flush stdout and stderr before the firstfork().
Quoted 6 lines
You're correct, we should do that. I was thinking we did flush things before forking but looking at the code I'm thinking of the
fork()call
in bitbake-worker, not the one indaemonize.py.I'd happily take a patch if someone wants to work one up!
I fixed this whilst looking at the other logging/buffer issues.
Cheers,
Richard