IOMMU: Tegra GART driver clean up and optimization
Subsystems (5)
v4 cover IOMMU: Tegra GART driver clean up and optimization
Hello,
This patch-series integrates the GART (IOMMU) driver with the Memory Controller driver, that allows to report the name of a faulty memory client on GART page fault. A major cleanup of the code is performed by this series as well, it also optimizes performance of the GART driver.
In the previous v2 iteration Thierry Reding suggested that it is better to break/change GART's device-tree ABI in order to integrate it with Memory Controller without much churning. This patch series includes patches that change the device tree binding in a way that updated driver will work only with the new binding and older kernels won't be broken by the new binding.
Changelog:
v4: In the v3 Rob Herring requested to make device-tree binding changes
backwards-compatible with the older kernels, that is achieved by changing the 'compatible' value of the DT node.
The code-refactoring patches got some more (minor) polish.
Added new patch "memory: tegra: Use of_device_get_match_data()".
v3: Memory Controller integration part has been reworked and now GART's
device-tree binding is changed. Adding Rob Herring for the device-tree changes reviewing.
GART now disallows more than one active domain at a time.
Fixed "spinlock recursion", "NULL pointer dereference" and "detaching of all devices from inactive domains".
New code-refactoring patches.
The previously standalone patch "memory: tegra: Don't invoke Tegra30+ specific memory timing setup on Tegra20" is now included into this series because there is a dependency on that patch and it wasn't applied yet.
v2: Addressed review comments from Robin Murphy to v1 by moving devices
iommu_fwspec check to gart_iommu_add_device().
Dropped the "Provide single domain and group for all devices" patch from the series for now because after some more considering it became not exactly apparent whether that is what we need, that was also suggested by Robin Murphy in the review comment. Maybe something like a runtime IOMMU usage for devices would be a better solution, allowing to implement transparent context switching of virtual IOMMU domains.
Some very minor code cleanups, reworded commit messages.
Dmitry Osipenko (20):
iommu/tegra: gart: Remove pr_fmt and clean up includes iommu/tegra: gart: Clean up driver probe errors handling iommu/tegra: gart: Ignore devices without IOMMU phandle in DT
iommu: Introduce iotlb_sync_map callback
iommu/tegra: gart: Optimize mapping / unmapping performance
dt-bindings: memory: tegra: Squash tegra20-gart into tegra20-mc
ARM: dts: tegra20: Update Memory Controller node to the new binding
memory: tegra: Don't invoke Tegra30+ specific memory timing setup on
Tegra20
memory: tegra: Adapt to Tegra20 device-tree binding changes
memory: tegra: Read client ID on GART page fault
memory: tegra: Use of_device_get_match_data() iommu/tegra: gart: Integrate with Memory Controller driver iommu/tegra: gart: Fix spinlock recursion iommu/tegra: gart: Fix NULL pointer dereference iommu/tegra: gart: Allow only one active domain at a time iommu/tegra: gart: Don't use managed resources iommu/tegra: gart: Prepend error/debug messages with "GART:" iommu/tegra: gart: Don't detach devices from inactive domains iommu/tegra: gart: Simplify clients-tracking code iommu/tegra: gart: Perform code refactoring
.../bindings/iommu/nvidia,tegra20-gart.txt | 14 - .../memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra20-mc.txt | 27 +- arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20.dtsi | 15 +- drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 8 +- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 478 +++++++----------- drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c | 95 +++- drivers/memory/tegra/mc.h | 6 - include/linux/iommu.h | 1 + include/soc/tegra/mc.h | 29 +- 10 files changed, 298 insertions(+), 376 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/nvidia,tegra20-gart.txt
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0
PATCH v4 1/20 iommu/tegra: gart: Remove pr_fmt and clean up includes
Remove unneeded headers inclusion and sort the headers in alphabet order. Remove pr_fmt macro since there is no pr_*() in the code and it doesn't affect dev_*() functions.
--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 17 +++++------------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +5 -12
@@ -17,21 +17,14 @@* 51 Franklin St - Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA. */ -#define pr_fmt (fmt) "%s(): " fmt, __func__ - +#include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/iommu.h> +#include <linux/list.h> #include <linux/module.h> -#include <linux/platform_device.h> -#include <linux/spinlock.h> +#include <linux/of_device.h> #include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/spinlock.h> #include <linux/vmalloc.h> -#include <linux/mm.h> -#include <linux/list.h> -#include <linux/device.h> -#include <linux/io.h> -#include <linux/iommu.h> -#include <linux/of.h> - -#include <asm/cacheflush.h> /* bitmap of the page sizes currently supported */ #define GART_IOMMU_PGSIZES (SZ_4K)
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0
Re: [PATCH v4 01/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Remove pr_fmt and clean up includes
Quoted 8 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
Remove unneeded headers inclusion and sort the headers in alphabet order. Remove
pr_fmtmacro since there is no pr_*() in the code and it doesn't affect dev_*() functions.Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 17 +++++------------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
PATCH v4 2/20 iommu/tegra: gart: Clean up driver probe errors handling
In reply to Dmitry OsipenkoProperly clean up allocated resources on the drivers probe failure and remove unneeded checks.
--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 16 ++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +10 -6
@@ -408,9 +408,6 @@ static int tegra_gart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;int ret; -if (gart_handle) -return -EIO ; -BUILD_BUG_ON (PAGE_SHIFT !=GART_PAGE_SHIFT );/* the GART memory aperture is required */
@@ -445,8 +442,7 @@ static int tegra_gart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ret =iommu_device_register (&gart->iommu);if (ret) {dev_err (dev,"Failed to register IOMMU\n" ); -iommu_device_sysfs_remove (&gart->iommu); -return ret; + goto remove_sysfs; } gart->dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -460,7 +456,8 @@ static int tegra_gart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) gart->savedata =vmalloc (array_size (sizeof (u32), gart->page_count));if (!gart->savedata) {dev_err (dev,"failed to allocate context save area\n" ); -return -ENOMEM ; + ret = -ENOMEM ; + goto unregister_iommu; }platform_set_drvdata (pdev, gart);
@@ -469,6 +466,13 @@ static int tegra_gart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) gart_handle = gart;return 0 ; + +unregister_iommu: +iommu_device_unregister (&gart->iommu); +remove_sysfs: +iommu_device_sysfs_remove (&gart->iommu); + +return ret; }static int tegra_gart_remove (struct platform_device *pdev)
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0
Re: [PATCH v4 02/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Clean up driver probe errors handling
Quoted 7 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
Properly clean up allocated resources on the drivers probe failure and remove unneeded checks.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 16 ++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
PATCH v4 3/20 iommu/tegra: gart: Ignore devices without IOMMU phandle in DT
In reply to Dmitry OsipenkoGART can't handle all devices, hence ignore devices that aren't related to GART. IOMMU phandle must be explicitly assign to devices in the device tree.
--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +13 -1
@@ -342,8 +342,12 @@ static bool gart_iommu_capable(enum iommu_cap cap)static int gart_iommu_add_device (struct device *dev) { -struct iommu_group *group =iommu_group_get_for_dev (dev); +struct iommu_group *group; +if (!dev->iommu_fwspec) +return -ENODEV ; + + group =iommu_group_get_for_dev (dev);if (IS_ERR (group))return PTR_ERR (group);
@@ -360,6 +364,12 @@ static void gart_iommu_remove_device(struct device *dev)iommu_device_unlink (&gart_handle->iommu, dev); } +static int gart_iommu_of_xlate (struct device *dev, +struct of_phandle_args *args) +{ +return 0 ; +} +static const struct iommu_ops gart_iommu_ops = { .capable = gart_iommu_capable, .domain_alloc = gart_iommu_domain_alloc,
@@ -373,6 +383,7 @@ static const struct iommu_ops gart_iommu_ops = { .unmap = gart_iommu_unmap, .iova_to_phys = gart_iommu_iova_to_phys, .pgsize_bitmap = GART_IOMMU_PGSIZES, + .of_xlate = gart_iommu_of_xlate, };static int tegra_gart_suspend (struct device *dev)
@@ -438,6 +449,7 @@ static int tegra_gart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) }iommu_device_set_ops (&gart->iommu, &gart_iommu_ops); +iommu_device_set_fwnode (&gart->iommu, dev->fwnode); ret =iommu_device_register (&gart->iommu);if (ret) {
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0
Re: [PATCH v4 03/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Ignore devices without IOMMU phandle in DT
Quoted 3 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
GART can't handle all devices, hence ignore devices that aren't related to GART. IOMMU phandle must be explicitly assign to devices in the device tree.
I think technically the GART can indeed handle all devices since it is just a physical address region that can be used to remap other physical addresses. That's not to say that doing so would be a good idea. So the commit message here is slightly confusing, but other than that the idea is good, so:
Re: [PATCH v4 03/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Ignore devices without IOMMU phandle in DT
Quoted 5 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 3 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
GART can't handle all devices, hence ignore devices that aren't related to GART. IOMMU phandle must be explicitly assign to devices in the device tree.
Quoted 8 lines
I think technically the GART can indeed handle all devices since it is just a physical address region that can be used to remap other physical addresses. That's not to say that doing so would be a good idea. So the commit message here is slightly confusing, but other than that the idea is good, so:
Acked-by Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
It shouldn't be able to serve something like SDHCI, though I haven't tried to verify that.
PATCH v4 4/20 iommu: Introduce iotlb_sync_map callback
In reply to Dmitry OsipenkoIntroduce iotlb_sync_map() callback that is invoked in the end of iommu_map(). This new callback allows IOMMU drivers to avoid syncing after mapping of each contiguous chunk and sync only when the whole mapping is completed, optimizing performance of the mapping operation.
--- drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 8 ++++++-- include/linux/iommu.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/iommu/iommu.c +6 -2
@@ -1545,13 +1545,14 @@ static size_t iommu_pgsize(struct iommu_domain *domain,int iommu_map (struct iommu_domain *domain,unsigned long iova,phys_addr_t paddr,size_t size,int prot) { +const struct iommu_ops *ops = domain->ops;unsigned long orig_iova = iova;unsigned int min_pagesz;size_t orig_size = size;phys_addr_t orig_paddr = paddr;int ret =0 ; -if (unlikely (domain->ops->map ==NULL || +if (unlikely (ops->map ==NULL || domain->pgsize_bitmap ==0UL ))return -ENODEV ;
@@ -1580,7 +1581,7 @@ int iommu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,pr_debug ("mapping: iova 0x%lx pa %pa pgsize 0x%zx\n" , iova, &paddr, pgsize); - ret = domain->ops->map (domain, iova, paddr, pgsize, prot); + ret = ops->map (domain, iova, paddr, pgsize, prot);if (ret)break ;
@@ -1589,6 +1590,9 @@ int iommu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova, size -= pgsize; } +if (ops->iotlb_sync_map) + ops->iotlb_sync_map (domain); +/* unroll mapping in case something went wrong */ if (ret)iommu_unmap (domain, orig_iova, orig_size - size);
include/linux/iommu.h +1 -0
@@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ struct iommu_ops {void (*flush_iotlb_all)(struct iommu_domain *domain);void (*iotlb_range_add)(struct iommu_domain *domain,unsigned long iova,size_t size); +void (*iotlb_sync_map)(struct iommu_domain *domain);void (*iotlb_sync)(struct iommu_domain *domain);phys_addr_t (*iova_to_phys)(struct iommu_domain *domain,dma_addr_t iova);int (*add_device)(struct device *dev);
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0
Re: [PATCH v4 04/20] iommu: Introduce iotlb_sync_map callback
Quoted 11 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
Introduce
iotlb_sync_map()callback that is invoked in the end ofiommu_map(). This new callback allows IOMMU drivers to avoid syncing after mapping of each contiguous chunk and sync only when the whole mapping is completed, optimizing performance of the mapping operation.Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Robin Murphy <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 8 ++++++-- include/linux/iommu.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
PATCH v4 5/20 iommu/tegra: gart: Optimize mapping / unmapping performance
In reply to Dmitry OsipenkoCurrently GART writes one page entry at a time. More optimal would be to aggregate the writes and flush BUS buffer in the end, this gives map/unmap 10-40% performance boost (depending on size of mapping) in comparison to flushing after each page entry update.
--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +10 -2
@@ -287,7 +287,6 @@ static int gart_iommu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova, } }gart_set_pte (gart, iova,GART_PTE (pfn)); -FLUSH_GART_REGS (gart);spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags);return 0 ; }
@@ -304,7 +303,6 @@ static size_t gart_iommu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,spin_lock_irqsave (&gart->pte_lock, flags);gart_set_pte (gart, iova,0 ); -FLUSH_GART_REGS (gart);spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags);return bytes; }
@@ -370,6 +368,14 @@ static int gart_iommu_of_xlate(struct device *dev,return 0 ; } +static void gart_iommu_sync (struct iommu_domain *domain) +{ +struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); +struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; + +FLUSH_GART_REGS (gart); +} +static const struct iommu_ops gart_iommu_ops = { .capable = gart_iommu_capable, .domain_alloc = gart_iommu_domain_alloc,
@@ -384,6 +390,8 @@ static const struct iommu_ops gart_iommu_ops = { .iova_to_phys = gart_iommu_iova_to_phys, .pgsize_bitmap = GART_IOMMU_PGSIZES, .of_xlate = gart_iommu_of_xlate, + .iotlb_sync_map = gart_iommu_sync, + .iotlb_sync = gart_iommu_sync, };static int tegra_gart_suspend (struct device *dev)
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0
Re: [PATCH v4 05/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Optimize mapping / unmapping performance
Quoted 9 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
Currently GART writes one page entry at a time. More optimal would be to aggregate the writes and flush BUS buffer in the end, this gives map/unmap 10-40% performance boost (depending on size of mapping) in comparison to flushing after each page entry update.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
10-40% sounds really nice, great stuff:
PATCH v4 6/20 dt-bindings: memory: tegra: Squash tegra20-gart into tegra20-mc
In reply to Dmitry OsipenkoSplitting GART and Memory Controller wasn't a good decision that was made back in the day. Given that the GART driver wasn't ever been used by anything in the kernel, we decided that it will be better to correct the mistakes of the past and merge two bindings into a single one. As a result there is a DT ABI change for the Memory Controller that allows not to break newer kernels using older DT and not to break older kernels using newer DT, that is done by changing the 'compatible' of the node to 'tegra20-mc-gart' and adding a new-required clock property. The new clock property also puts the tegra20-mc binding in line with the bindings of the later Tegra generations.
--- .../bindings/iommu/nvidia,tegra20-gart.txt | 14 ---------- .../memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra20-mc.txt | 27 +++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/nvidia,tegra20-gart.txt
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/nvidia,tegra20-gart.txt deleted +0 -14
@@ -1,14 +0,0 @@ -NVIDIA Tegra 20 GART - -Required properties: -- compatible: "nvidia,tegra20-gart" -- reg: Two pairs of cells specifying the physical address and size of - the memory controller registers and the GART aperture respectively. - -Example: - - gart { - compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-gart"; - reg = <0x7000f024 0x00000018 /* controller registers */ - 0x58000000 0x02000000>; /* GART aperture */ - };
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra20-mc.txt +19 -8
@@ -1,26 +1,37 @@ NVIDIA Tegra20 MC(Memory Controller) Required properties: -- compatible : "nvidia,tegra20-mc" -- reg : Should contain 2 register ranges(address and length); see the - example below. Note that the MC registers are interleaved with the - GART registers, and hence must be represented as multiple ranges. +- compatible : "nvidia,tegra20-mc-gart" +- reg : Should contain 2 register ranges: physical base address and length of + the controller's registers and the GART aperture respectively. +- clocks: Must contain an entry for each entry in clock-names. + See ../clocks/clock-bindings.txt for details. +- clock-names: Must include the following entries: + - mc: the module's clock input - interrupts : Should contain MC General interrupt. - #reset-cells : Should be 1. This cell represents memory client module ID. The assignments may be found in header file <dt-bindings/memory/tegra20-mc.h> or in the TRM documentation. +- #iommu-cells: Should be 0. This cell represents the number of cells in an + IOMMU specifier needed to encode an address. GART supports only a single + address space that is shared by all devices, therefore no additional + information needed for the address encoding. Example: mc: memory-controller@7000f000 { - compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-mc"; - reg = <0x7000f000 0x024 - 0x7000f03c 0x3c4>; - interrupts = <0 77 0x04>; + compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-mc-gart"; + reg = <0x7000f000 0x400 /* controller registers */ + 0x58000000 0x02000000>; /* GART aperture */ + clocks = <&tegra_car TEGRA20_CLK_MC>; + clock-names = "mc"; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 77 0x04>; #reset-cells = <1>; + #iommu-cells = <0>; }; video-codec@6001a000 { compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-vde"; ... resets = <&mc TEGRA20_MC_RESET_VDE>; + iommus = <&mc>; };
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0
Re: [PATCH v4 06/20] dt-bindings: memory: tegra: Squash tegra20-gart into tegra20-mc
Quoted 43 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
Splitting GART and Memory Controller wasn't a good decision that was made back in the day. Given that the GART driver wasn't ever been used by anything in the kernel, we decided that it will be better to correct the mistakes of the past and merge two bindings into a single one. As a result there is a DT ABI change for the Memory Controller that allows not to break newer kernels using older DT and not to break older kernels using newer DT, that is done by changing the 'compatible' of the node to 'tegra20-mc-gart' and adding a new-required clock property. The new clock property also puts the tegra20-mc binding in line with the bindings of the later Tegra generations.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- .../bindings/iommu/nvidia,tegra20-gart.txt | 14 ---------- .../memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra20-mc.txt | 27 +++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/nvidia,tegra20-gart.txtDocumentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/nvidia,tegra20-gart.txt deleted +0
-14@@ -1,14 +0,0 @@ -NVIDIA Tegra 20 GART - -Required properties: -- compatible: "nvidia,tegra20-gart" -- reg: Two pairs of cells specifying the physical address and size of - the memory controller registers and the GART aperture respectively. - -Example: - - gart { - compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-gart"; - reg = <0x7000f024 0x00000018 /* controller registers */ - 0x58000000 0x02000000>; /* GART aperture */ - };Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra20-mc.txt +0
-0
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra20-mc.txt line 6
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra20-mc.txt +3
-4@@ -1,26 +1,37 @@ NVIDIA Tegra20 MC(Memory Controller) Required properties: -- compatible : "nvidia,tegra20-mc" -- reg : Should contain 2 register ranges(address and length); see the - example below. Note that the MC registers are interleaved with the - GART registers, and hence must be represented as multiple ranges. +- compatible : "nvidia,tegra20-mc-gart" +- reg : Should contain 2 register ranges: physical base address and length of + the controller's registers and the GART aperture respectively.
Couldn't we have achieved the same thing by adding a reg-names property instead of using a different compatible string? After all we only change what information the DT provides, but the device is still a "tegra20-mc" device.
Thierry
Rob Herring
maintainerRe: [PATCH v4 06/20] dt-bindings: memory: tegra: Squash tegra20-gart into tegra20-mc
Quoted 46 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 45 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
Splitting GART and Memory Controller wasn't a good decision that was made back in the day. Given that the GART driver wasn't ever been used by anything in the kernel, we decided that it will be better to correct the mistakes of the past and merge two bindings into a single one. As a result there is a DT ABI change for the Memory Controller that allows not to break newer kernels using older DT and not to break older kernels using newer DT, that is done by changing the 'compatible' of the node to 'tegra20-mc-gart' and adding a new-required clock property. The new clock property also puts the tegra20-mc binding in line with the bindings of the later Tegra generations.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- .../bindings/iommu/nvidia,tegra20-gart.txt | 14 ---------- .../memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra20-mc.txt | 27 +++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/nvidia,tegra20-gart.txtDocumentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/nvidia,tegra20-gart.txt deleted +0
-14@@ -1,14 +0,0 @@ -NVIDIA Tegra 20 GART - -Required properties: -- compatible: "nvidia,tegra20-gart" -- reg: Two pairs of cells specifying the physical address and size of - the memory controller registers and the GART aperture respectively. - -Example: - - gart { - compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-gart"; - reg = <0x7000f024 0x00000018 /* controller registers */ - 0x58000000 0x02000000>; /* GART aperture */ - };Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra20-mc.txt +0
-0@@ -1,26 +1,37 @@ NVIDIA Tegra20 MC(Memory Controller)
Quoted 13 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra20-mc.txt line 6
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra20-mc.txt +3
-4Required properties: -- compatible : "nvidia,tegra20-mc" -- reg : Should contain 2 register ranges(address and length); see the - example below. Note that the MC registers are interleaved with the - GART registers, and hence must be represented as multiple ranges. +- compatible : "nvidia,tegra20-mc-gart" +- reg : Should contain 2 register ranges: physical base address and length of + the controller's registers and the GART aperture respectively.Couldn't we have achieved the same thing by adding a reg-names property instead of using a different compatible string? After all we only change what information the DT provides, but the device is still a "tegra20-mc" device.
Yes, if we were adding a reg field, but we're changing what the 2 reg fields contain, so I think a new compatible is best.
Rob
Re: [PATCH v4 06/20] dt-bindings: memory: tegra: Squash tegra20-gart into tegra20-mc
In reply to Dmitry OsipenkoQuoted 11 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
Splitting GART and Memory Controller wasn't a good decision that was made back in the day. Given that the GART driver wasn't ever been used by anything in the kernel, we decided that it will be better to correct the mistakes of the past and merge two bindings into a single one. As a result there is a DT ABI change for the Memory Controller that allows not to break newer kernels using older DT and not to break older kernels using newer DT, that is done by changing the 'compatible' of the node to 'tegra20-mc-gart' and adding a new-required clock property. The new clock property also puts the tegra20-mc binding in line with the bindings of the later Tegra generations.
Quoted 7 lines
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- .../bindings/iommu/nvidia,tegra20-gart.txt | 14 ---------- .../memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra20-mc.txt | 27 +++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/nvidia,tegra20-gart.txt
PATCH v4 7/20 ARM: dts: tegra20: Update Memory Controller node to the new binding
In reply to Dmitry OsipenkoDevice tree binding of Memory Controller has been changed: GART has been squashed into the MC, there are a new mandatory clock and #iommu-cells properties, the compatible has been changed to 'tegra20-mc-gart'.
--- arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20.dtsi | 15 ++++++--------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20.dtsi +6 -9
@@ -616,17 +616,14 @@ }; mc: memory-controller@7000f000 { - compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-mc"; - reg = <0x7000f000 0x024 - 0x7000f03c 0x3c4>; + compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-mc-gart"; + reg = <0x7000f000 0x400 /* controller registers */ + 0x58000000 0x02000000>; /* GART aperture */ + clocks = <&tegra_car TEGRA20_CLK_MC>; + clock-names = "mc"; interrupts = <GIC_SPI 77 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; #reset-cells = <1>; - }; - - iommu@7000f024 { - compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-gart"; - reg = <0x7000f024 0x00000018 /* controller registers */ - 0x58000000 0x02000000>; /* GART aperture */ + #iommu-cells = <0>; }; memory-controller@7000f400 {
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0
PATCH v4 8/20 memory: tegra: Don't invoke Tegra30+ specific memory timing setup on Tegra20
In reply to Dmitry OsipenkoThis fixes irrelevant "tegra-mc 7000f000.memory-controller: no memory timings for RAM code 0 registered" warning message during of kernels boot-up on Tegra20.
--- drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c +6 -5
@@ -664,12 +664,13 @@ static int tegra_mc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } isr = tegra_mc_irq; - } - err =tegra_mc_setup_timings (mc); -if (err <0 ) { -dev_err (&pdev->dev,"failed to setup timings: %d\n" , err); -return err; + err =tegra_mc_setup_timings (mc); +if (err <0 ) { +dev_err (&pdev->dev,"failed to setup timings: %d\n" , + err); +return err; + } } mc->irq =platform_get_irq (pdev,0 );
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0
PATCH v4 9/20 memory: tegra: Adapt to Tegra20 device-tree binding changes
In reply to Dmitry OsipenkoThe tegra20-mc device-tree binding has been changed, GART has been squashed into Memory Controller and now the clock property is mandatory for Tegra20, the DT compatible has been changed as well. Adapt driver to the DT changes.
--- drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c | 21 ++++++++------------- drivers/memory/tegra/mc.h | 6 ------ include/soc/tegra/mc.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c +8 -13
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@static const struct of_device_id tegra_mc_of_match[] = { #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC - { .compatible ="nvidia,tegra20-mc" , .data = &tegra20_mc_soc }, + { .compatible ="nvidia,tegra20-mc-gart" , .data = &tegra20_mc_soc }, #endif #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra30-mc", .data = &tegra30_mc_soc },
@@ -638,24 +638,19 @@ static int tegra_mc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)if (IS_ERR (mc->regs))return PTR_ERR (mc->regs); + mc->clk =devm_clk_get (&pdev->dev,"mc" ); +if (IS_ERR (mc->clk)) { +dev_err (&pdev->dev,"failed to get MC clock: %ld\n" , +PTR_ERR (mc->clk)); +return PTR_ERR (mc->clk); + } +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOCif (mc->soc == &tegra20_mc_soc) { - res =platform_get_resource (pdev,IORESOURCE_MEM ,1 ); - mc->regs2 =devm_ioremap_resource (&pdev->dev, res); -if (IS_ERR (mc->regs2)) -return PTR_ERR (mc->regs2); - isr = tegra20_mc_irq; } else#endif { - mc->clk =devm_clk_get (&pdev->dev,"mc" ); -if (IS_ERR (mc->clk)) { -dev_err (&pdev->dev,"failed to get MC clock: %ld\n" , -PTR_ERR (mc->clk)); -return PTR_ERR (mc->clk); - } - err =tegra_mc_setup_latency_allowance (mc);if (err <0 ) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to setup latency allowance: %d\n",
drivers/memory/tegra/mc.h +0 -6
@@ -26,18 +26,12 @@static inline u32 mc_readl (struct tegra_mc *mc,unsigned long offset) { -if (mc->regs2 && offset >=0x24 ) -return readl (mc->regs2 + offset -0x3c ); -return readl (mc->regs + offset); }static inline void mc_writel (struct tegra_mc *mc,u32 value,unsigned long offset) { -if (mc->regs2 && offset >=0x24 ) -return writel (value, mc->regs2 + offset -0x3c ); -writel (value, mc->regs + offset); }
include/soc/tegra/mc.h +1 -1
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ struct tegra_mc_soc {struct tegra_mc {struct device *dev;struct tegra_smmu *smmu; -void __iomem *regs, *regs2; +void __iomem *regs;struct clk *clk;int irq;
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0
Re: [PATCH v4 09/20] memory: tegra: Adapt to Tegra20 device-tree binding changes
Quoted 17 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
The tegra20-mc device-tree binding has been changed, GART has been squashed into Memory Controller and now the clock property is mandatory for Tegra20, the DT compatible has been changed as well. Adapt driver to the DT changes.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c | 21 ++++++++------------- drivers/memory/tegra/mc.h | 6 ------ include/soc/tegra/mc.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c +0
-0
drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c line 54
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c +1
-1@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@static const struct of_device_id tegra_mc_of_match[] = { #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC - { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-mc", .data = &tegra20_mc_soc }, + { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-mc-gart", .data = &tegra20_mc_soc },
Technically we now regress because we no longer support the older device tree bindings. I know that it doesn't really matter because this driver doesn't really do much interesting yet other than reporting memory access violations, but if that's enough to warrant a change of the compatible string, then I think we also need to preserve compatibility in the code.
That said, I think compatibility would be easier to preserve if we stuck with the old compatible string and used a "reg-names" property to specify which version of the binding we're referring to.
For example, we could have:
memory-controller@7000f000 {
compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-mc";
reg = <0x7000f000 0x024
0x7000f03c 0x3c4>;
...
};for the old binding and:
memory-controller@7000f000 {
compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-mc";
reg = <0x7000f000 0x00000400>,
<0x58000000 0x02000000>;
reg-names = "mc", "gart";
...
};for the new binding. The driver can then easily check for the existence of the reg-names property and take the legacy or new code paths.
Thierry
Re: [PATCH v4 09/20] memory: tegra: Adapt to Tegra20 device-tree binding changes
Quoted 54 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 17 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
The tegra20-mc device-tree binding has been changed, GART has been squashed into Memory Controller and now the clock property is mandatory for Tegra20, the DT compatible has been changed as well. Adapt driver to the DT changes.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c | 21 ++++++++------------- drivers/memory/tegra/mc.h | 6 ------ include/soc/tegra/mc.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c +0
-0drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c line 54
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c +1
-1@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@static const struct of_device_id tegra_mc_of_match[] = { #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC - { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-mc", .data = &tegra20_mc_soc }, + { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-mc-gart", .data = &tegra20_mc_soc },Technically we now regress because we no longer support the older device tree bindings. I know that it doesn't really matter because this driver doesn't really do much interesting yet other than reporting memory access violations, but if that's enough to warrant a change of the compatible string, then I think we also need to preserve compatibility in the code.
That said, I think compatibility would be easier to preserve if we stuck with the old compatible string and used a "reg-names" property to specify which version of the binding we're referring to.
For example, we could have:
memory-controller@7000f000 { compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-mc"; reg = <0x7000f000 0x024 0x7000f03c 0x3c4>; ... };for the old binding and:
memory-controller@7000f000 { compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-mc"; reg = <0x7000f000 0x00000400>, <0x58000000 0x02000000>; reg-names = "mc", "gart"; ... };
Quoted 2 lines
for the new binding. The driver can then easily check for the existence of the reg-names property and take the legacy or new code paths.
There is no problem with keeping compatibility for newer kernels with the older binding, it just not worth the effort. The real problem is keeping compatibility of older kernels with the new binding, the older kernels won't care about the reg-names and will treat GART registers as the second registers bank of the Memory Controller. Unfortunately I don't see how your suggestion is supposed to help with the problem.
Re: [PATCH v4 09/20] memory: tegra: Adapt to Tegra20 device-tree binding changes
Quoted 58 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
Quoted 54 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 17 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
The tegra20-mc device-tree binding has been changed, GART has been squashed into Memory Controller and now the clock property is mandatory for Tegra20, the DT compatible has been changed as well. Adapt driver to the DT changes.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>---
drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c| 21 ++++++++-------------drivers/memory/tegra/mc.h| 6 ------ include/soc/tegra/mc.h | 2 +-3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c +0
-0drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c line 54
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c +1
-1@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id tegra_mc_of_match[] = { #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC - { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-mc", .data = &tegra20_mc_soc }, + { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-mc-gart", .data = &tegra20_mc_soc },Technically we now regress because we no longer support the older device tree bindings. I know that it doesn't really matter because this driver doesn't really do much interesting yet other than reporting memory access violations, but if that's enough to warrant a change of the compatible string, then I think we also need to preserve compatibility in the code.
That said, I think compatibility would be easier to preserve if we stuck with the old compatible string and used a "reg-names" property to specify which version of the binding we're referring to.
For example, we could have:
memory-controller@7000f000 {
compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-mc";
reg = <0x7000f0000x024
0x7000f03c0x3c4>;
...
};for the old binding and:
memory-controller@7000f000 {
compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-mc";
reg = <0x7000f0000x00000400>,
<0x580000000x02000000>;
reg-names = "mc", "gart";
...
};Quoted 2 lines
for the new binding. The driver can then easily check for the existence of the reg-names property and take the legacy or new code paths.
Quoted 6 lines
There is no problem with keeping compatibility for newer kernels with the older binding, it just not worth the effort. The real problem is keeping compatibility of older kernels with the new binding, the older kernels won't care about the reg-names and will treat GART registers as the second registers bank of the Memory Controller. Unfortunately I don't see how your suggestion is supposed to help with the problem.
I've another variant. What about to drop the GART registers from the binding? The range is always fixed and there is no good reason to artificially change it. I recall that in the past you didn't like the patch that made the GART's aperture size fixed, saying that some imaginary person may want to change it via DT. It's still not a very good argument to me, I can't see a good reason why anyone may want to change the aperture size.
The new binding will look like this (just like T30+ binding, only iommu-cells number differ):
memory-controller@7000f000 {
compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-mc";
reg = <0x7000f000 0x00000400>;
clocks = <&tegra_car TEGRA20_CLK_MC>;
clock-names = "mc";
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 77 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
#reset-cells = <1>;
#iommu-cells = <0>;
};That way older kernel will continue to work with the new binding because of the miss of the second registers range and new kernels may keep supporting the old binding. Though I don't think that keeping support of the old binding really worth the churning. Thoughts?
Note that new kernels will require the "mc" clock and hence the old binding will be rejected because it doesn't have that clock.
PATCH v4 10/20 memory: tegra: Read client ID on GART page fault
In reply to Dmitry OsipenkoWith the device tree binding changes, now Memory Controller has access to GART registers. Hence it is now possible to read client ID on GART page fault to get information about what memory client causes the fault.
--- drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c +10 -2
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@#define MC_ERR_ADR 0x0c +#define MC_GART_ERROR_REQ 0x30#define MC_DECERR_EMEM_OTHERS_STATUS 0x58#define MC_SECURITY_VIOLATION_STATUS 0x74
@@ -575,8 +576,15 @@ static __maybe_unused irqreturn_t tegra20_mc_irq(int irq, void *data)break ;case MC_INT_INVALID_GART_PAGE : -dev_err_ratelimited (mc->dev,"%s\n" , error); -continue ; + reg =MC_GART_ERROR_REQ ; + value =mc_readl (mc, reg); + + id = (value >>1 ) & mc->soc->client_id_mask; + desc = error_names[2 ]; + +if (value &BIT (0 )) + direction ="write" ; +break ;case MC_INT_SECURITY_VIOLATION : reg =MC_SECURITY_VIOLATION_STATUS ;
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0
PATCH v4 11/20 memory: tegra: Use of_device_get_match_data()
In reply to Dmitry OsipenkoThere is no need to match device with the DT node since it was already matched, use of_device_get_match_data() helper to get the match-data.
--- drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c | 10 ++-------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c +2 -8
@@ -11,8 +11,7 @@#include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/module.h> -#include <linux/of.h> -#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/of_device.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/sort.h>
@@ -619,23 +618,18 @@ static __maybe_unused irqreturn_t tegra20_mc_irq(int irq, void *data)static int tegra_mc_probe (struct platform_device *pdev) { -const struct of_device_id *match;struct resource *res;struct tegra_mc *mc;void *isr;int err; - match =of_match_node (tegra_mc_of_match, pdev->dev.of_node); -if (!match) -return -ENODEV ; - mc =devm_kzalloc (&pdev->dev,sizeof (*mc),GFP_KERNEL );if (!mc)return -ENOMEM ;platform_set_drvdata (pdev, mc);spin_lock_init (&mc->lock); - mc->soc = match->data; + mc->soc =of_device_get_match_data (&pdev->dev); mc->dev = &pdev->dev;/* length of MC tick in nanoseconds */
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0
Re: [PATCH v4 11/20] memory: tegra: Use of_device_get_match_data()
Quoted 13 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
There is no need to match device with the DT node since it was already matched, use
of_device_get_match_data()helper to get the match-data.Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c | 10 ++-------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c +0
-0
drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c line 15
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c +0
-2@@ -11,8 +11,7 @@#include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/module.h> -#include <linux/of.h> -#include <linux/platform_device.h>
It's better not to remove these two because the code still uses functions declared in them. If ever we were going to remove code using linux/of_device.h and then remove the linux/of_device.h include, we'd break the build and have to reintroduce the includes.
The same would happen if linux/of_device.h were ever to stop including linux/platform_device.h or linux/of.h. That may sound unlikely, but it has happened in the past with other includes. It can also happen that some restructuring takes place in some headers that is not so obvious and then things can still start falling apart miles away.
Thierry
Re: [PATCH v4 11/20] memory: tegra: Use of_device_get_match_data()
Quoted 9 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 8 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
There is no need to match device with the DT node since it was already matched, use
of_device_get_match_data()helper to get the match-data.Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c | 10 ++-------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Quoted 15 lines
drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c line 15
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c +0
-2@@ -11,8 +11,7 @@#include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/module.h> -#include <linux/of.h> -#include <linux/platform_device.h> It's better not to remove these two because the code still uses functions declared in them. If ever we were going to remove code using
linux/of_device.hand then remove thelinux/of_device.hinclude, we'd break the build and have to reintroduce the includes.
That doesn't sound like a good argument. You're way too picky here ;)
Quoted 5 lines
The same would happen if
linux/of_device.hwere ever to stop includinglinux/platform_device.horlinux/of.h. That may sound unlikely, but it has happened in the past with other includes. It can also happen that some restructuring takes place in some headers that is not so obvious and then things can still start falling apart miles away.
Restructuring will be somebody else problem. Not sure that we really should care about it, I think it is unnecessary. But since you're insisting..
Re: [PATCH v4 11/20] memory: tegra: Use of_device_get_match_data()
Quoted 34 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
Quoted 9 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 8 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
There is no need to match device with the DT node since it was already matched, use
of_device_get_match_data()helper to get the match-data.Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c | 10 ++-------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)Quoted 15 lines
drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c line 15
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c +0
-2@@ -11,8 +11,7 @@#include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/module.h> -#include <linux/of.h> -#include <linux/platform_device.h> It's better not to remove these two because the code still uses functions declared in them. If ever we were going to remove code using
linux/of_device.hand then remove thelinux/of_device.hinclude, we'd break the build and have to reintroduce the includes.That doesn't sound like a good argument. You're way too picky here ;)
Quoted 5 lines
The same would happen if
linux/of_device.hwere ever to stop includinglinux/platform_device.horlinux/of.h. That may sound unlikely, but it has happened in the past with other includes. It can also happen that some restructuring takes place in some headers that is not so obvious and then things can still start falling apart miles away.
Quoted 3 lines
Restructuring will be somebody else problem. Not sure that we really should care about it, I think it is unnecessary. But since you're insisting..
It's actually a very common argument and I've seen patches in the past that add includes just for the purpose of making sure the right definitions get pulled in. This happens quite frequently as a preamble to some major rework of some header files that would otherwise cause a lot of breakage.
So I think it's best to be proactive about this and make sure we explicitly pull in all the necessary headers in the first place, irrespective of whether or not they may already get pulled in indirectly by some other headers.
Thierry
Re: [PATCH v4 11/20] memory: tegra: Use of_device_get_match_data()
Quoted 45 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 34 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
Quoted 9 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 8 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
There is no need to match device with the DT node since it was already matched, use
of_device_get_match_data()helper to get the match-data.Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c | 10 ++-------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)Quoted 15 lines
drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c line 15
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c +0
-2@@ -11,8 +11,7 @@#include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/module.h> -#include <linux/of.h> -#include <linux/platform_device.h> It's better not to remove these two because the code still uses functions declared in them. If ever we were going to remove code using
linux/of_device.hand then remove thelinux/of_device.hinclude, we'd break the build and have to reintroduce the includes.That doesn't sound like a good argument. You're way too picky here ;)
Quoted 5 lines
The same would happen if
linux/of_device.hwere ever to stop includinglinux/platform_device.horlinux/of.h. That may sound unlikely, but it has happened in the past with other includes. It can also happen that some restructuring takes place in some headers that is not so obvious and then things can still start falling apart miles away.Quoted 3 lines
Restructuring will be somebody else problem. Not sure that we really should care about it, I think it is unnecessary. But since you're insisting..
It's actually a very common argument and I've seen patches in the past that add includes just for the purpose of making sure the right definitions get pulled in. This happens quite frequently as a preamble to some major rework of some header files that would otherwise cause a lot of breakage.
Quoted 4 lines
So I think it's best to be proactive about this and make sure we explicitly pull in all the necessary headers in the first place, irrespective of whether or not they may already get pulled in indirectly by some other headers.
Ok
PATCH v4 12/20 iommu/tegra: gart: Integrate with Memory Controller driver
In reply to Dmitry OsipenkoThe device-tree binding has been changed. There is no separate GART device anymore, it is squashed into the Memory Controller. Integrate GART module with the MC in a way it is done for the SMMU of Tegra30+.
--- drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 98 ++++++++++---------------------------- drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++ include/soc/tegra/mc.h | 27 +++++++++++ 4 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
drivers/iommu/Kconfig +1 -0
@@ -269,6 +269,7 @@ config ROCKCHIP_IOMMU config TEGRA_IOMMU_GART bool "Tegra GART IOMMU Support" depends on ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC + depends on TEGRA_MC select IOMMU_API help Enables support for remapping discontiguous physical memory
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +24 -74
173 lines not on this page · raw message
drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c +41 -0
54 lines not on this page · raw message
include/soc/tegra/mc.h +27 -0
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ struct tegra_smmu_soc {struct tegra_mc ;struct tegra_smmu ; +struct gart_device ;#ifdef CONFIG_TEGRA_IOMMU_SMMU struct tegra_smmu *tegra_smmu_probe(struct device *dev,
@@ -96,6 +97,31 @@ static inline void tegra_smmu_remove(struct tegra_smmu *smmu) }#endif +#ifdef CONFIG_TEGRA_IOMMU_GART +struct gart_device *tegra_gart_probe (struct device *dev, +const struct tegra_smmu_soc *soc, +struct tegra_mc *mc); +int tegra_gart_suspend (struct gart_device *gart); +int tegra_gart_resume (struct gart_device *gart); +#else +static inline struct gart_device * +tegra_gart_probe (struct device *dev,const struct tegra_smmu_soc *soc, +struct tegra_mc *mc) +{ +return NULL ; +} + +static inline int tegra_gart_suspend (struct gart_device *gart) +{ +return -ENODEV ; +} + +static inline int tegra_gart_resume (struct gart_device *gart) +{ +return -ENODEV ; +} +#endif +struct tegra_mc_reset {const char *name;unsigned long id;
@@ -144,6 +170,7 @@ struct tegra_mc_soc {struct tegra_mc {struct device *dev;struct tegra_smmu *smmu; +struct gart_device *gart;void __iomem *regs;struct clk *clk;int irq;
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0
Re: [PATCH v4 12/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Integrate with Memory Controller driver
Quoted 11 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
The device-tree binding has been changed. There is no separate GART device anymore, it is squashed into the Memory Controller. Integrate GART module with the MC in a way it is done for the SMMU of Tegra30+.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 98 ++++++++++---------------------------- drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++ include/soc/tegra/mc.h | 27 +++++++++++ 4 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
I think this could technically have been two patches, but since they'd have a compile-time dependency either way they need to be applied in the correct order, so some coordination between IOMMU and Tegra trees is going to have to happen anyway and might as well just stick this into a single patch.
Thierry
Re: [PATCH v4 12/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Integrate with Memory Controller driver
Quoted 13 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 11 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
The device-tree binding has been changed. There is no separate GART device anymore, it is squashed into the Memory Controller. Integrate GART module with the MC in a way it is done for the SMMU of Tegra30+.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 98 ++++++++++---------------------------- drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++ include/soc/tegra/mc.h | 27 +++++++++++ 4 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
Quoted 5 lines
I think this could technically have been two patches, but since they'd have a compile-time dependency either way they need to be applied in the correct order, so some coordination between IOMMU and Tegra trees is going to have to happen anyway and might as well just stick this into a single patch.
I assume that Joerg will take the whole series once it's ready (no?), hence your ACK will be needed here and in other patches.
Re: [PATCH v4 12/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Integrate with Memory Controller driver
Quoted 14 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
Quoted 13 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 11 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
The device-tree binding has been changed. There is no separate GART device anymore, it is squashed into the Memory Controller. Integrate GART module with the MC in a way it is done for the SMMU of Tegra30+.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 98 ++++++++++---------------------------- drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++ include/soc/tegra/mc.h | 27 +++++++++++ 4 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
I think this could technically have been two patches, but since they'd have a compile-time dependency either way they need to be applied in the correct order, so some coordination between IOMMU and Tegra trees is going to have to happen anyway and might as well just stick this into a single patch.
I assume that Joerg will take the whole series once it's ready (no?), hence your ACK will be needed here and in other patches.
Yeah, either Joerg takes them all with my Acked-by's or provides his for the IOMMU bits and I take the batch through the Tegra tree. I don't have a strong preference.
Thierry
PATCH v4 13/20 iommu/tegra: gart: Fix spinlock recursion
In reply to Dmitry OsipenkoFix spinlock recursion bug that happens on IOMMU domain destruction if any of the allocated domains have devices attached to them.
--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +16 -8
@@ -195,25 +195,33 @@ static int gart_iommu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,return err; } -static void gart_iommu_detach_dev (struct iommu_domain *domain, -struct device *dev) +static void __gart_iommu_detach_dev (struct iommu_domain *domain, +struct device *dev) {struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain);struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart;struct gart_client *c; -spin_lock (&gart->client_lock); -list_for_each_entry (c, &gart->client, list) {if (c->dev == dev) {list_del (&c->list);devm_kfree (gart->dev, c);dev_dbg (gart->dev,"Detached %s\n" ,dev_name (dev)); - goto out; +return ; } } -dev_err (gart->dev,"Couldn't find\n" ); -out: + +dev_err (gart->dev,"Couldn't find %s to detach\n" ,dev_name (dev)); +} + +static void gart_iommu_detach_dev (struct iommu_domain *domain, +struct device *dev) +{ +struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); +struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; + +spin_lock (&gart->client_lock); +__gart_iommu_detach_dev (domain, dev);spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock); }
@@ -253,7 +261,7 @@ static void gart_iommu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)struct gart_client *c;list_for_each_entry (c, &gart->client, list) -gart_iommu_detach_dev (domain, c->dev); +__gart_iommu_detach_dev (domain, c->dev); }spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock); }
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0
Re: [PATCH v4 13/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Fix spinlock recursion
Quoted 7 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
Fix spinlock recursion bug that happens on IOMMU domain destruction if any of the allocated domains have devices attached to them.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
PATCH v4 14/20 iommu/tegra: gart: Fix NULL pointer dereference
In reply to Dmitry OsipenkoFix NULL pointer dereference on IOMMU domain destruction that happens because clients list is being iterated unsafely and its elements are getting deleted during the iteration.
--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +2 -2
@@ -258,9 +258,9 @@ static void gart_iommu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)if (gart) {spin_lock (&gart->client_lock);if (!list_empty (&gart->client)) { -struct gart_client *c; +struct gart_client *c, *tmp; -list_for_each_entry (c, &gart->client, list) +list_for_each_entry_safe (c, tmp, &gart->client, list)__gart_iommu_detach_dev (domain, c->dev); }spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock);
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0
Re: [PATCH v4 14/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Fix NULL pointer dereference
Quoted 8 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
Fix NULL pointer dereference on IOMMU domain destruction that happens because clients list is being iterated unsafely and its elements are getting deleted during the iteration.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
PATCH v4 15/20 iommu/tegra: gart: Allow only one active domain at a time
In reply to Dmitry OsipenkoGART has a single address space that is shared by all devices, hence only one domain could be active at a time.
--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +9 -0
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ struct gart_device {spinlock_t pte_lock;/* for pagetable */ struct list_head client;spinlock_t client_lock;/* for client list */ +struct iommu_domain *active_domain;/* current active domain */ struct device *dev;struct iommu_device iommu;/* IOMMU Core handle */
@@ -184,6 +185,12 @@ static int gart_iommu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, goto fail; } } +if (gart->active_domain && gart->active_domain != domain) { +dev_err (gart->dev,"Only one domain can be active at a time\n" ); + err = -EINVAL ; + goto fail; + } + gart->active_domain = domain;list_add (&client->list, &gart->client);spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock);dev_dbg (gart->dev,"Attached %s\n" ,dev_name (dev));
@@ -206,6 +213,8 @@ static void __gart_iommu_detach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,if (c->dev == dev) {list_del (&c->list);devm_kfree (gart->dev, c); +if (list_empty (&gart->client)) + gart->active_domain =NULL ;dev_dbg (gart->dev,"Detached %s\n" ,dev_name (dev));return ; }
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0
Re: [PATCH v4 15/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Allow only one active domain at a time
Quoted 13 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
GART has a single address space that is shared by all devices, hence only one domain could be active at a time.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +0
-0
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c struct gart_device { · line 58
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +1
-0@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ struct gart_device {spinlock_t pte_lock;/* for pagetable */ struct list_head client;spinlock_t client_lock;/* for client list */ +struct iommu_domain *active_domain;/* current active domain */
The active_ prefix seems a little unnecessary here, but either way:
PATCH v4 16/20 iommu/tegra: gart: Don't use managed resources
In reply to Dmitry OsipenkoGART is a part of the Memory Controller driver that is always built-in, hence there is no benefit from the use of managed resources.
--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +7 -5
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static int gart_iommu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,struct gart_client *client, *c;int err =0 ; - client =devm_kzalloc (gart->dev,sizeof (*c),GFP_KERNEL ); + client =kzalloc (sizeof (*c),GFP_KERNEL );if (!client)return -ENOMEM ; client->dev = dev;
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static int gart_iommu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,return 0 ; fail: -devm_kfree (gart->dev, client); +kfree (client);spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock);return err; }
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static void __gart_iommu_detach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,list_for_each_entry (c, &gart->client, list) {if (c->dev == dev) {list_del (&c->list); -devm_kfree (gart->dev, c); +kfree (c);if (list_empty (&gart->client)) gart->active_domain =NULL ;dev_dbg (gart->dev,"Detached %s\n" ,dev_name (dev));
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ struct gart_device *tegra_gart_probe(struct device *dev,return ERR_PTR (-ENXIO ); } - gart =devm_kzalloc (dev,sizeof (*gart),GFP_KERNEL ); + gart =kzalloc (sizeof (*gart),GFP_KERNEL );if (!gart) {dev_err (dev,"failed to allocate gart_device\n" );return ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM );
@@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ struct gart_device *tegra_gart_probe(struct device *dev, ret =iommu_device_sysfs_add (&gart->iommu, dev,NULL ,"gart" );if (ret) {dev_err (dev,"Failed to register IOMMU in sysfs\n" ); -return ERR_PTR (ret); + goto free_gart; }iommu_device_set_ops (&gart->iommu, &gart_iommu_ops);
@@ -506,6 +506,8 @@ struct gart_device *tegra_gart_probe(struct device *dev,iommu_device_unregister (&gart->iommu); remove_sysfs:iommu_device_sysfs_remove (&gart->iommu); +free_gart: +kfree (gart);return ERR_PTR (ret); }
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0
Re: [PATCH v4 16/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Don't use managed resources
Quoted 7 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
GART is a part of the Memory Controller driver that is always built-in, hence there is no benefit from the use of managed resources.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
One benefit would be cleanup on probe error. Also, we may eventually want to make even the memory controller driver buildable as a module.
Thierry
Re: [PATCH v4 16/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Don't use managed resources
Quoted 11 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 7 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
GART is a part of the Memory Controller driver that is always built-in, hence there is no benefit from the use of managed resources.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)One benefit would be cleanup on probe error. Also, we may eventually want to make even the memory controller driver buildable as a module.
Please, let's keep that patch as is and re-introduce devm once it will become really relevant.
Re: [PATCH v4 16/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Don't use managed resources
Quoted 10 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
Quoted 9 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 7 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
GART is a part of the Memory Controller driver that is always built-in, hence there is no benefit from the use of managed resources.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
One benefit would be cleanup on probe error. Also, we may eventually want to make even the memory controller driver buildable as a module.
Please, let's keep that patch as is and re-introduce devm once it will become really relevant.
Alright, fine with me.
Thierry
Re: [PATCH v4 16/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Don't use managed resources
Quoted 11 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 10 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
Quoted 9 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 7 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
GART is a part of the Memory Controller driver that is always built-in, hence there is no benefit from the use of managed resources.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
One benefit would be cleanup on probe error. Also, we may eventually want to make even the memory controller driver buildable as a module.
Please, let's keep that patch as is and re-introduce devm once it will become really relevant.
Alright, fine with me.
Thanks, I'm taking that as ACK.
PATCH v4 17/20 iommu/tegra: gart: Prepend error/debug messages with "GART:"
In reply to Dmitry OsipenkoGART became a part of Memory Controller, hence now the drivers device is Memory Controller and not GART. As a result all printed messages are prepended with the "tegra-mc 7000f000.memory-controller:", so let's prepend GART's messages with "GART:" in order to differentiate them from the MC.
--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +18 -18
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static inline void gart_set_pte(struct gart_device *gart,writel (offs, gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_ADDR );writel (pte, gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_DATA ); -dev_dbg (gart->dev,"%s %08lx:%08x\n" , +dev_dbg (gart->dev,"GART: %s %08lx:%08x\n" , pte ?"map" :"unmap" , offs, pte &GART_PAGE_MASK ); }
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static void gart_dump_table(struct gart_device *gart) pte =gart_read_pte (gart, iova); -dev_dbg (gart->dev,"%s %08lx:%08lx\n" , +dev_dbg (gart->dev,"GART: %s %08lx:%08lx\n" , (GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID & pte) ?"v" :" " , iova, pte &GART_PAGE_MASK ); }
@@ -179,21 +179,22 @@ static int gart_iommu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,spin_lock (&gart->client_lock);list_for_each_entry (c, &gart->client, list) {if (c->dev == dev) { -dev_err (gart->dev, -"%s is already attached\n" ,dev_name (dev)); +dev_err (gart->dev,"GART: %s is already attached\n" , +dev_name (dev)); err = -EINVAL ; goto fail; } }if (gart->active_domain && gart->active_domain != domain) { -dev_err (gart->dev,"Only one domain can be active at a time\n" ); +dev_err (gart->dev, +"GART: Only one domain can be active at a time\n" ); err = -EINVAL ; goto fail; } gart->active_domain = domain;list_add (&client->list, &gart->client);spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock); -dev_dbg (gart->dev,"Attached %s\n" ,dev_name (dev)); +dev_dbg (gart->dev,"GART: Attached %s\n" ,dev_name (dev));return 0 ; fail:
@@ -215,12 +216,14 @@ static void __gart_iommu_detach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,kfree (c);if (list_empty (&gart->client)) gart->active_domain =NULL ; -dev_dbg (gart->dev,"Detached %s\n" ,dev_name (dev)); +dev_dbg (gart->dev,"GART: Detached %s\n" , +dev_name (dev));return ; } } -dev_err (gart->dev,"Couldn't find %s to detach\n" ,dev_name (dev)); +dev_err (gart->dev,"GART: Couldn't find %s to detach\n" , +dev_name (dev)); } static void gart_iommu_detach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,
@@ -293,7 +296,7 @@ static int gart_iommu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,spin_lock_irqsave (&gart->pte_lock, flags); pfn =__phys_to_pfn (pa);if (!pfn_valid (pfn)) { -dev_err (gart->dev,"Invalid page: %pa\n" , &pa); +dev_err (gart->dev,"GART: Invalid page: %pa\n" , &pa);spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags);return -EINVAL ; }
@@ -301,7 +304,7 @@ static int gart_iommu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova, pte =gart_read_pte (gart, iova);if (pte &GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID ) {spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags); -dev_err (gart->dev,"Page entry is in-use\n" ); +dev_err (gart->dev,"GART: Page entry is in-use\n" );return -EBUSY ; } }
@@ -344,7 +347,7 @@ static phys_addr_t gart_iommu_iova_to_phys(struct iommu_domain *domain, pa = (pte &GART_PAGE_MASK );if (!pfn_valid (__phys_to_pfn (pa))) { -dev_err (gart->dev,"No entry for %08llx:%pa\n" , +dev_err (gart->dev,"GART: No entry for %08llx:%pa\n" , (unsigned long long )iova, &pa);gart_dump_table (gart);return -EINVAL ;
@@ -455,19 +458,17 @@ struct gart_device *tegra_gart_probe(struct device *dev, res_remap =platform_get_resource (to_platform_device (dev),IORESOURCE_MEM ,1 );if (!res_remap) { -dev_err (dev,"GART memory aperture expected\n" ); +dev_err (dev,"GART: Memory aperture resource unavailable\n" );return ERR_PTR (-ENXIO ); } gart =kzalloc (sizeof (*gart),GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!gart) { -dev_err (dev,"failed to allocate gart_device\n" ); +if (!gart)return ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); - } ret =iommu_device_sysfs_add (&gart->iommu, dev,NULL ,"gart" );if (ret) { -dev_err (dev,"Failed to register IOMMU in sysfs\n" ); +dev_err (dev,"GART: Failed to register IOMMU sysfs\n" ); goto free_gart; }
@@ -476,7 +477,7 @@ struct gart_device *tegra_gart_probe(struct device *dev, ret =iommu_device_register (&gart->iommu);if (ret) { -dev_err (dev,"Failed to register IOMMU\n" ); +dev_err (dev,"GART: Failed to register IOMMU\n" ); goto remove_sysfs; }
@@ -491,7 +492,6 @@ struct gart_device *tegra_gart_probe(struct device *dev, gart->savedata =vmalloc (array_size (sizeof (u32), gart->page_count));if (!gart->savedata) { -dev_err (dev,"failed to allocate context save area\n" ); ret = -ENOMEM ; goto unregister_iommu; }
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0
Re: [PATCH v4 17/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Prepend error/debug messages with "GART:"
Quoted 10 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
GART became a part of Memory Controller, hence now the drivers device is Memory Controller and not GART. As a result all printed messages are prepended with the "tegra-mc 7000f000.memory-controller:", so let's prepend GART's messages with "GART:" in order to differentiate them from the MC.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
There's a macro called dev_fmt (similar to pr_fmt) to do this for dev_* printers. Also I think this would be more readable if the prefix was "gart: " rather than "GART: ". At least from my personal experience I get easily distracted by all-caps words in logs, because they usually indicate something that requires immediate attention. I think it's better to leave that up to higher level mechanisms, such as the color keying of messages based on level by tools like dmesg.
Thierry
Re: [PATCH v4 17/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Prepend error/debug messages with "GART:"
Quoted 12 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 10 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
GART became a part of Memory Controller, hence now the drivers device is Memory Controller and not GART. As a result all printed messages are prepended with the "tegra-mc 7000f000.memory-controller:", so let's prepend GART's messages with "GART:" in order to differentiate them from the MC.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Quoted 7 lines
There's a macro called
dev_fmt(similar topr_fmt) to do this for dev_* printers. Also I think this would be more readable if the prefix was "gart: " rather than "GART: ". At least from my personal experience I get easily distracted by all-caps words in logs, because they usually indicate something that requires immediate attention. I think it's better to leave that up to higher level mechanisms, such as the color keying of messages based on level by tools like dmesg.
The dev_fmt is a new thing, thank you for pointing at it. I'll try to switch to dev_fmt and lower the text case.
PATCH v4 18/20 iommu/tegra: gart: Don't detach devices from inactive domains
In reply to Dmitry OsipenkoThere could be unlimited number of allocated domains, but only one domain can be active at a time. Hence devices must be detached only from the active domain.
--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +5 -3
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static int gart_iommu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev) {struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); -struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; +struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle;struct gart_client *client, *c;int err =0 ;
@@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ static int gart_iommu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, goto fail; } gart->active_domain = domain; + gart_domain->gart = gart;list_add (&client->list, &gart->client);spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock);dev_dbg (gart->dev,"GART: Attached %s\n" ,dev_name (dev));
@@ -214,8 +215,10 @@ static void __gart_iommu_detach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,if (c->dev == dev) {list_del (&c->list);kfree (c); -if (list_empty (&gart->client)) +if (list_empty (&gart->client)) { gart->active_domain =NULL ; + gart_domain->gart =NULL ; + }dev_dbg (gart->dev,"GART: Detached %s\n" ,dev_name (dev));return ;
@@ -253,7 +256,6 @@ static struct iommu_domain *gart_iommu_domain_alloc(unsigned type)if (!gart_domain)return NULL ; - gart_domain->gart = gart; gart_domain->domain.geometry.aperture_start = gart->iovmm_base; gart_domain->domain.geometry.aperture_end = gart->iovmm_base + gart->page_count *GART_PAGE_SIZE -1 ;
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0
Re: [PATCH v4 18/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Don't detach devices from inactive domains
Quoted 8 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
There could be unlimited number of allocated domains, but only one domain can be active at a time. Hence devices must be detached only from the active domain.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Do we have a mechanism of switching out different domains? I don't think we do, so I'm wondering if perhaps a better solution to this would be to just refuse to create more than one domain in the first place. That would also allow us to get rid of the global variable gart_handle.
Thierry
Re: [PATCH v4 18/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Don't detach devices from inactive domains
Quoted 10 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 8 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
There could be unlimited number of allocated domains, but only one domain can be active at a time. Hence devices must be detached only from the active domain.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Quoted 4 lines
Do we have a mechanism of switching out different domains? I don't think we do, so I'm wondering if perhaps a better solution to this would be to just refuse to create more than one domain in the first place. That would also allow us to get rid of the global variable
gart_handle.
That's what was done in v1, Robin Murphy suggested that it will be better not to restrict allocation of unpopulated domains. It is mentioned in the changelog, see comment to v2 changes.
Re: [PATCH v4 18/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Don't detach devices from inactive domains
Quoted 11 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
Quoted 10 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 8 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
There could be unlimited number of allocated domains, but only one domain can be active at a time. Hence devices must be detached only from the active domain.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Do we have a mechanism of switching out different domains? I don't think we do, so I'm wondering if perhaps a better solution to this would be to just refuse to create more than one domain in the first place. That would also allow us to get rid of the global variable
gart_handle.That's what was done in v1, Robin Murphy suggested that it will be better not to restrict allocation of unpopulated domains. It is mentioned in the changelog, see comment to v2 changes.
Okay, fine.
Thierry
Re: [PATCH v4 18/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Don't detach devices from inactive domains
Quoted 17 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 16 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
Quoted 14 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 8 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
There could be unlimited number of allocated domains, but only one domain can be active at a time. Hence devices must be detached only from the active domain.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)Do we have a mechanism of switching out different domains? I don't think we do, so I'm wondering if perhaps a better solution to this would be to just refuse to create more than one domain in the first place. That would also allow us to get rid of the global variable
gart_handle.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
That's what was done in v1, Robin Murphy suggested that it will be better not to restrict allocation of unpopulated domains. It is mentioned in the changelog, see comment to v2 changes.
Okay, fine.
Thanks, taking as ACK.
PATCH v4 19/20 iommu/tegra: gart: Simplify clients-tracking code
In reply to Dmitry OsipenkoGART is a simple IOMMU provider that has single address space. There is no need to setup global clients list and manage it for tracking of the active domain, hence lot's of code could be safely removed and replaced with a simpler alternative.
--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 157 +++++++++---------------------------- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +39 -118
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@#include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/iommu.h> -#include <linux/list.h> #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/slab.h>
@@ -42,30 +41,20 @@#define GART_PAGE_MASK \ (~(GART_PAGE_SIZE - 1) & ~GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID) -struct gart_client { -struct device *dev; -struct list_head list; -}; -struct gart_device {void __iomem *regs;u32 *savedata;u32 page_count;/* total remappable size */ dma_addr_t iovmm_base;/* offset to vmm_area */ spinlock_t pte_lock;/* for pagetable */ -struct list_head client; -spinlock_t client_lock;/* for client list */ +spinlock_t dom_lock;/* for active domain */ +unsigned int active_devices;/* number of active devices */ struct iommu_domain *active_domain;/* current active domain */ struct device *dev;struct iommu_device iommu;/* IOMMU Core handle */ }; -struct gart_domain { -struct iommu_domain domain;/* generic domain handle */ -struct gart_device *gart;/* link to gart device */ -}; -static struct gart_device *gart_handle;/* unique for a system */ static bool gart_debug;
@@ -73,11 +62,6 @@ static bool gart_debug;#define GART_PTE (_pfn) \ (GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID | ((_pfn) << PAGE_SHIFT)) -static struct gart_domain *to_gart_domain (struct iommu_domain *dom) -{ - return container_of(dom, struct gart_domain, domain); -} -/* * Any interaction between any block on PPSB and a block on APB or AHB * must have these read-back to ensure the APB/AHB bus transaction is
@@ -166,128 +150,69 @@ static inline bool gart_iova_range_valid(struct gart_device *gart,static int gart_iommu_attach_dev (struct iommu_domain *domain,struct device *dev) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain);struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle; -struct gart_client *client, *c; -int err =0 ; - - client =kzalloc (sizeof (*c),GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!client) -return -ENOMEM ; - client->dev = dev; - -spin_lock (&gart->client_lock); -list_for_each_entry (c, &gart->client, list) { -if (c->dev == dev) { -dev_err (gart->dev,"GART: %s is already attached\n" , -dev_name (dev)); - err = -EINVAL ; - goto fail; - } - } -if (gart->active_domain && gart->active_domain != domain) { -dev_err (gart->dev, -"GART: Only one domain can be active at a time\n" ); - err = -EINVAL ; - goto fail; - } - gart->active_domain = domain; - gart_domain->gart = gart; -list_add (&client->list, &gart->client); -spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock); -dev_dbg (gart->dev,"GART: Attached %s\n" ,dev_name (dev)); -return 0 ; +int ret =0 ; -fail: -kfree (client); -spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock); -return err; -} +spin_lock (&gart->dom_lock); -static void __gart_iommu_detach_dev (struct iommu_domain *domain, -struct device *dev) -{ -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); -struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; -struct gart_client *c; - -list_for_each_entry (c, &gart->client, list) { -if (c->dev == dev) { -list_del (&c->list); -kfree (c); -if (list_empty (&gart->client)) { - gart->active_domain =NULL ; - gart_domain->gart =NULL ; - } -dev_dbg (gart->dev,"GART: Detached %s\n" , -dev_name (dev)); -return ; - } +if (gart->active_domain && gart->active_domain != domain) { + ret = -EBUSY ; + }else if (dev->archdata.iommu != domain) { + dev->archdata.iommu = domain; + gart->active_domain = domain; + gart->active_devices++; } -dev_err (gart->dev,"GART: Couldn't find %s to detach\n" , -dev_name (dev)); +spin_unlock (&gart->dom_lock); + +return ret; }static void gart_iommu_detach_dev (struct iommu_domain *domain,struct device *dev) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); -struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; +struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle; + +spin_lock (&gart->dom_lock); -spin_lock (&gart->client_lock); -__gart_iommu_detach_dev (domain, dev); -spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock); +if (dev->archdata.iommu == domain) { + dev->archdata.iommu =NULL ; + +if (--gart->active_devices ==0 ) + gart->active_domain =NULL ; + } + +spin_unlock (&gart->dom_lock); }static struct iommu_domain *gart_iommu_domain_alloc (unsigned type) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain; -struct gart_device *gart; +struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle; +struct iommu_domain *domain;if (type !=IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED )return NULL ; - gart = gart_handle; -if (!gart) -return NULL ; - - gart_domain =kzalloc (sizeof (*gart_domain),GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!gart_domain) -return NULL ; - - gart_domain->domain.geometry.aperture_start = gart->iovmm_base; - gart_domain->domain.geometry.aperture_end = gart->iovmm_base + + domain =kzalloc (sizeof (*domain),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (domain) { + domain->geometry.aperture_start = gart->iovmm_base; + domain->geometry.aperture_end = gart->iovmm_base + gart->page_count *GART_PAGE_SIZE -1 ; - gart_domain->domain.geometry.force_aperture = true; + domain->geometry.force_aperture = true; + } -return &gart_domain->domain; +return domain; }static void gart_iommu_domain_free (struct iommu_domain *domain) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); -struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; - -if (gart) { -spin_lock (&gart->client_lock); -if (!list_empty (&gart->client)) { -struct gart_client *c, *tmp; - -list_for_each_entry_safe (c, tmp, &gart->client, list) -__gart_iommu_detach_dev (domain, c->dev); - } -spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock); - } - -kfree (gart_domain); +kfree (domain); }static int gart_iommu_map (struct iommu_domain *domain,unsigned long iova,phys_addr_t pa,size_t bytes,int prot) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); -struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; +struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle;unsigned long flags;unsigned long pfn;unsigned long pte;
@@ -318,8 +243,7 @@ static int gart_iommu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,static size_t gart_iommu_unmap (struct iommu_domain *domain,unsigned long iova,size_t bytes) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); -struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; +struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle;unsigned long flags;if (!gart_iova_range_valid (gart, iova, bytes))
@@ -334,8 +258,7 @@ static size_t gart_iommu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,static phys_addr_t gart_iommu_iova_to_phys (struct iommu_domain *domain,dma_addr_t iova) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); -struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; +struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle;unsigned long pte;phys_addr_t pa;unsigned long flags;
@@ -394,8 +317,7 @@ static int gart_iommu_of_xlate(struct device *dev,static void gart_iommu_sync (struct iommu_domain *domain) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); -struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; +struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle;FLUSH_GART_REGS (gart); }
@@ -486,8 +408,7 @@ struct gart_device *tegra_gart_probe(struct device *dev, gart->dev = dev; gart_regs = mc->regs +GART_REG_BASE ;spin_lock_init (&gart->pte_lock); -spin_lock_init (&gart->client_lock); -INIT_LIST_HEAD (&gart->client); +spin_lock_init (&gart->dom_lock); gart->regs = gart_regs; gart->iovmm_base = (dma_addr_t )res_remap->start; gart->page_count = (resource_size (res_remap) >>GART_PAGE_SHIFT );
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0
Re: [PATCH v4 19/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Simplify clients-tracking code
Quoted 122 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
GART is a simple IOMMU provider that has single address space. There is no need to setup global clients list and manage it for tracking of the active domain, hence lot's of code could be safely removed and replaced with a simpler alternative.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 157 +++++++++---------------------------- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +4
-64@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@#include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/iommu.h> -#include <linux/list.h> #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/slab.h> @@ -42,30 +41,20 @@#define GART_PAGE_MASK \ (~(GART_PAGE_SIZE - 1) & ~GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID) -struct gart_client { -struct device *dev; -struct list_head list; -}; -struct gart_device {void __iomem *regs;u32 *savedata;u32 page_count;/* total remappable size */ dma_addr_t iovmm_base;/* offset to vmm_area */ spinlock_t pte_lock;/* for pagetable */ -struct list_head client; -spinlock_t client_lock;/* for client list */ +spinlock_t dom_lock;/* for active domain */ +unsigned int active_devices;/* number of active devices */ struct iommu_domain *active_domain;/* current active domain */ struct device *dev;struct iommu_device iommu;/* IOMMU Core handle */ }; -struct gart_domain { -struct iommu_domain domain;/* generic domain handle */ -struct gart_device *gart;/* link to gart device */ -}; -static struct gart_device *gart_handle;/* unique for a system */ static bool gart_debug;@@ -73,11 +62,6 @@ static bool gart_debug;#define GART_PTE (_pfn) \ (GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID | ((_pfn) << PAGE_SHIFT)) -static struct gart_domain *to_gart_domain (struct iommu_domain *dom) -{ - return container_of(dom, struct gart_domain, domain); -} -/* * Any interaction between any block on PPSB and a block on APB or AHB * must have these read-back to ensure the APB/AHB bus transaction is @@ -166,128 +150,69 @@ static inline bool gart_iova_range_valid(struct gart_device *gart,static int gart_iommu_attach_dev (struct iommu_domain *domain,struct device *dev) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain);struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle; -struct gart_client *client, *c; -int err =0 ; - - client =kzalloc (sizeof (*c),GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!client) -return -ENOMEM ; - client->dev = dev; - -spin_lock (&gart->client_lock); -list_for_each_entry (c, &gart->client, list) { -if (c->dev == dev) { -dev_err (gart->dev,"GART: %s is already attached\n" , -dev_name (dev)); - err = -EINVAL ; - goto fail; - } - } -if (gart->active_domain && gart->active_domain != domain) { -dev_err (gart->dev, -"GART: Only one domain can be active at a time\n" ); - err = -EINVAL ; - goto fail; - } - gart->active_domain = domain; - gart_domain->gart = gart; -list_add (&client->list, &gart->client); -spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock); -dev_dbg (gart->dev,"GART: Attached %s\n" ,dev_name (dev)); -return 0 ; +int ret =0 ; -fail: -kfree (client); -spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock); -return err; -} +spin_lock (&gart->dom_lock); -static void __gart_iommu_detach_dev (struct iommu_domain *domain, -struct device *dev) -{ -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); -struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; -struct gart_client *c; - -list_for_each_entry (c, &gart->client, list) { -if (c->dev == dev) { -list_del (&c->list); -kfree (c);
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c static inline bool gart_iova_range_valid(struct gart_device *gart, · line 159
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +2
-8-if (list_empty (&gart->client)) { - gart->active_domain =NULL ; - gart_domain->gart =NULL ; - } -dev_dbg (gart->dev,"GART: Detached %s\n" , -dev_name (dev)); -return ; - } +if (gart->active_domain && gart->active_domain != domain) { + ret = -EBUSY ;
This omits the error message and returns -EBUSY instead of -EINVAL. Was this intended? For what it's worth, I do agree with the changes, it's just that I think you could've made those in the earlier patch that introduced them.
But this is all one series and the end result looks fine, so no need to be that picky.
Quoted 77 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +27
-28+ }else if (dev->archdata.iommu != domain) { + dev->archdata.iommu = domain; + gart->active_domain = domain; + gart->active_devices++; } -dev_err (gart->dev,"GART: Couldn't find %s to detach\n" , -dev_name (dev)); +spin_unlock (&gart->dom_lock); + +return ret; }static void gart_iommu_detach_dev (struct iommu_domain *domain,struct device *dev) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); -struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; +struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle; + +spin_lock (&gart->dom_lock); -spin_lock (&gart->client_lock); -__gart_iommu_detach_dev (domain, dev); -spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock); +if (dev->archdata.iommu == domain) { + dev->archdata.iommu =NULL ; + +if (--gart->active_devices ==0 ) + gart->active_domain =NULL ; + } + +spin_unlock (&gart->dom_lock); }static struct iommu_domain *gart_iommu_domain_alloc (unsigned type) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain; -struct gart_device *gart; +struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle; +struct iommu_domain *domain;if (type !=IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED )return NULL ; - gart = gart_handle; -if (!gart) -return NULL ; - - gart_domain =kzalloc (sizeof (*gart_domain),GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!gart_domain) -return NULL ; - - gart_domain->domain.geometry.aperture_start = gart->iovmm_base; - gart_domain->domain.geometry.aperture_end = gart->iovmm_base + + domain =kzalloc (sizeof (*domain),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (domain) { + domain->geometry.aperture_start = gart->iovmm_base; + domain->geometry.aperture_end = gart->iovmm_base + gart->page_count *GART_PAGE_SIZE -1 ; - gart_domain->domain.geometry.force_aperture = true; + domain->geometry.force_aperture = true; + } -return &gart_domain->domain; +return domain; }static void gart_iommu_domain_free (struct iommu_domain *domain) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); -struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; - -if (gart) { -spin_lock (&gart->client_lock); -if (!list_empty (&gart->client)) { -struct gart_client *c, *tmp;
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c static inline bool gart_iova_range_valid(struct gart_device *gart, · line 210
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +1
-8- -list_for_each_entry_safe (c, tmp, &gart->client, list) -__gart_iommu_detach_dev (domain, c->dev); - } -spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock); - } - -kfree (gart_domain); +kfree (domain); }
Doesn't this now make it possible to free a potentially active domain?
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c static inline bool gart_iova_range_valid(struct gart_device *gart, · line 215
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +1
-2static int gart_iommu_map (struct iommu_domain *domain,unsigned long iova,phys_addr_t pa,size_t bytes,int prot) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); -struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; +struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle;
Hmm... this now introduces more uses of the gart_handle that I hoped we could get rid of. I think we could still keep around struct gart_domain and just make sure it is unique. The small amounts of casting here seem mostly harmless to me, especially since they will be nops, so we end up with just one dereference to get at the struct gart_device. I think the benefits of not having this global variable around are worth the one dereference here.
Thierry
Re: [PATCH v4 19/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Simplify clients-tracking code
Quoted 130 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 129 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
GART is a simple IOMMU provider that has single address space. There is no need to setup global clients list and manage it for tracking of the active domain, hence lot's of code could be safely removed and replaced with a simpler alternative.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 157 +++++++++---------------------------- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +4
-71@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@#include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/iommu.h> -#include <linux/list.h> #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/slab.h> @@ -42,30 +41,20 @@#define GART_PAGE_MASK \ (~(GART_PAGE_SIZE - 1) & ~GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID) -struct gart_client { -struct device *dev; -struct list_head list; -}; -struct gart_device {void __iomem *regs;u32 *savedata;u32 page_count;/* total remappable size */ dma_addr_t iovmm_base;/* offset to vmm_area */ spinlock_t pte_lock;/* for pagetable */ -struct list_head client; -spinlock_t client_lock;/* for client list */ +spinlock_t dom_lock;/* for active domain */ +unsigned int active_devices;/* number of active devices */ struct iommu_domain *active_domain;/* current active domain */ struct device *dev;struct iommu_device iommu;/* IOMMU Core handle */ }; -struct gart_domain { -struct iommu_domain domain;/* generic domain handle */ -struct gart_device *gart;/* link to gart device */ -}; -static struct gart_device *gart_handle;/* unique for a system */ static bool gart_debug;@@ -73,11 +62,6 @@ static bool gart_debug;#define GART_PTE (_pfn) \ (GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID | ((_pfn) << PAGE_SHIFT)) -static struct gart_domain *to_gart_domain (struct iommu_domain *dom) -{ - return container_of(dom, struct gart_domain, domain); -} -/* * Any interaction between any block on PPSB and a block on APB or AHB * must have these read-back to ensure the APB/AHB bus transaction is @@ -166,128 +150,69 @@ static inline bool gart_iova_range_valid(struct gart_device *gart,static int gart_iommu_attach_dev (struct iommu_domain *domain,struct device *dev) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain);struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle; -struct gart_client *client, *c; -int err =0 ; - - client =kzalloc (sizeof (*c),GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!client) -return -ENOMEM ; - client->dev = dev; - -spin_lock (&gart->client_lock); -list_for_each_entry (c, &gart->client, list) { -if (c->dev == dev) { -dev_err (gart->dev,"GART: %s is already attached\n" , -dev_name (dev)); - err = -EINVAL ; - goto fail; - } - } -if (gart->active_domain && gart->active_domain != domain) { -dev_err (gart->dev, -"GART: Only one domain can be active at a time\n" ); - err = -EINVAL ; - goto fail; - } - gart->active_domain = domain; - gart_domain->gart = gart; -list_add (&client->list, &gart->client); -spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock); -dev_dbg (gart->dev,"GART: Attached %s\n" ,dev_name (dev)); -return 0 ; +int ret =0 ; -fail: -kfree (client); -spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock); -return err; -} +spin_lock (&gart->dom_lock); -static void __gart_iommu_detach_dev (struct iommu_domain *domain, -struct device *dev) -{ -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); -struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; -struct gart_client *c; - -list_for_each_entry (c, &gart->client, list) { -if (c->dev == dev) { -list_del (&c->list); -kfree (c); -if (list_empty (&gart->client)) { - gart->active_domain =NULL ; - gart_domain->gart =NULL ; - } -dev_dbg (gart->dev,"GART: Detached %s\n" , -dev_name (dev)); -return ;
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c static inline bool gart_iova_range_valid(struct gart_device *gart, · line 159
Quoted 3 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +2
-1- } +if (gart->active_domain && gart->active_domain != domain) { + ret = -EBUSY ;This omits the error message and returns
-EBUSYinstead of-EINVAL. Was this intended? For what it's worth, I do agree with the changes, it's just that I think you could've made those in the earlier patch that introduced them.
The message isn't really needed and EBUSY seems fit better than EINVAL here.
Quoted 2 lines
But this is all one series and the end result looks fine, so no need to be that picky.
Good, thanks.
Quoted 81 lines
Quoted 81 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +27
-32+ }else if (dev->archdata.iommu != domain) { + dev->archdata.iommu = domain; + gart->active_domain = domain; + gart->active_devices++; } -dev_err (gart->dev,"GART: Couldn't find %s to detach\n" , -dev_name (dev)); +spin_unlock (&gart->dom_lock); + +return ret; }static void gart_iommu_detach_dev (struct iommu_domain *domain,struct device *dev) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); -struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; +struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle; + +spin_lock (&gart->dom_lock); -spin_lock (&gart->client_lock); -__gart_iommu_detach_dev (domain, dev); -spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock); +if (dev->archdata.iommu == domain) { + dev->archdata.iommu =NULL ; + +if (--gart->active_devices ==0 ) + gart->active_domain =NULL ; + } + +spin_unlock (&gart->dom_lock); }static struct iommu_domain *gart_iommu_domain_alloc (unsigned type) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain; -struct gart_device *gart; +struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle; +struct iommu_domain *domain;if (type !=IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED )return NULL ; - gart = gart_handle; -if (!gart) -return NULL ; - - gart_domain =kzalloc (sizeof (*gart_domain),GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!gart_domain) -return NULL ; - - gart_domain->domain.geometry.aperture_start = gart->iovmm_base; - gart_domain->domain.geometry.aperture_end = gart->iovmm_base + + domain =kzalloc (sizeof (*domain),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (domain) { + domain->geometry.aperture_start = gart->iovmm_base; + domain->geometry.aperture_end = gart->iovmm_base + gart->page_count *GART_PAGE_SIZE -1 ; - gart_domain->domain.geometry.force_aperture = true; + domain->geometry.force_aperture = true; + } -return &gart_domain->domain; +return domain; }static void gart_iommu_domain_free (struct iommu_domain *domain) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); -struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; - -if (gart) { -spin_lock (&gart->client_lock); -if (!list_empty (&gart->client)) { -struct gart_client *c, *tmp; - -list_for_each_entry_safe (c, tmp, &gart->client, list) -__gart_iommu_detach_dev (domain, c->dev); - }
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c static inline bool gart_iova_range_valid(struct gart_device *gart, · line 210
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +1
-4-spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock); - } - -kfree (gart_domain); +kfree (domain); }Doesn't this now make it possible to free a potentially active domain?
Yes, don't do it. I can add a WARN_ON() here, though I think IOMMU core should be the one taking care about that.
Quoted 15 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c static inline bool gart_iova_range_valid(struct gart_device *gart, · line 215
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +1
-2static int gart_iommu_map (struct iommu_domain *domain,unsigned long iova,phys_addr_t pa,size_t bytes,int prot) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); -struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; +struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle;Hmm... this now introduces more uses of the
gart_handlethat I hoped we could get rid of. I think we could still keep around structgart_domainand just make sure it is unique. The small amounts of casting here seem mostly harmless to me, especially since they will be nops, so we end up with just one dereference to get at the structgart_device. I think the benefits of not having this global variable around are worth the one dereference here.
What are the benefits? I don't see anything other than the pedantic oddity.
I've removed gart_domain in the end because it is an extra code (and consumed resources) without any benefit. Let's keep that part as it is now. I'll be happy to change that code if you'll explain why it is worth it.
Re: [PATCH v4 19/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Simplify clients-tracking code
Quoted 237 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
Quoted 130 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 129 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
GART is a simple IOMMU provider that has single address space. There is no need to setup global clients list and manage it for tracking of the active domain, hence lot's of code could be safely removed and replaced with a simpler alternative.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 157 +++++++++---------------------------- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +4
-71@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@#include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/iommu.h> -#include <linux/list.h> #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/slab.h> @@ -42,30 +41,20 @@#define GART_PAGE_MASK \ (~(GART_PAGE_SIZE - 1) & ~GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID) -struct gart_client { -struct device *dev; -struct list_head list; -}; -struct gart_device {void __iomem *regs;u32 *savedata;u32 page_count;/* total remappable size */ dma_addr_t iovmm_base;/* offset to vmm_area */ spinlock_t pte_lock;/* for pagetable */ -struct list_head client; -spinlock_t client_lock;/* for client list */ +spinlock_t dom_lock;/* for active domain */ +unsigned int active_devices;/* number of active devices */ struct iommu_domain *active_domain;/* current active domain */ struct device *dev;struct iommu_device iommu;/* IOMMU Core handle */ }; -struct gart_domain { -struct iommu_domain domain;/* generic domain handle */ -struct gart_device *gart;/* link to gart device */ -}; -static struct gart_device *gart_handle;/* unique for a system */ static bool gart_debug;@@ -73,11 +62,6 @@ static bool gart_debug;#define GART_PTE (_pfn) \ (GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID | ((_pfn) << PAGE_SHIFT)) -static struct gart_domain *to_gart_domain (struct iommu_domain *dom) -{ - return container_of(dom, struct gart_domain, domain); -} -/* * Any interaction between any block on PPSB and a block on APB or AHB * must have these read-back to ensure the APB/AHB bus transaction is @@ -166,128 +150,69 @@ static inline bool gart_iova_range_valid(struct gart_device *gart,static int gart_iommu_attach_dev (struct iommu_domain *domain,struct device *dev) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain);struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle; -struct gart_client *client, *c; -int err =0 ; - - client =kzalloc (sizeof (*c),GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!client) -return -ENOMEM ; - client->dev = dev; - -spin_lock (&gart->client_lock); -list_for_each_entry (c, &gart->client, list) { -if (c->dev == dev) { -dev_err (gart->dev,"GART: %s is already attached\n" , -dev_name (dev)); - err = -EINVAL ; - goto fail; - } - } -if (gart->active_domain && gart->active_domain != domain) { -dev_err (gart->dev, -"GART: Only one domain can be active at a time\n" ); - err = -EINVAL ; - goto fail; - } - gart->active_domain = domain; - gart_domain->gart = gart; -list_add (&client->list, &gart->client); -spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock); -dev_dbg (gart->dev,"GART: Attached %s\n" ,dev_name (dev)); -return 0 ; +int ret =0 ; -fail: -kfree (client); -spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock); -return err; -} +spin_lock (&gart->dom_lock); -static void __gart_iommu_detach_dev (struct iommu_domain *domain, -struct device *dev) -{ -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); -struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; -struct gart_client *c; - -list_for_each_entry (c, &gart->client, list) { -if (c->dev == dev) { -list_del (&c->list); -kfree (c); -if (list_empty (&gart->client)) { - gart->active_domain =NULL ; - gart_domain->gart =NULL ; - } -dev_dbg (gart->dev,"GART: Detached %s\n" , -dev_name (dev)); -return ;Quoted 8 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c static inline bool gart_iova_range_valid(struct gart_device *gart, · line 159
Quoted 3 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +2
-1- } +if (gart->active_domain && gart->active_domain != domain) { + ret = -EBUSY ;This omits the error message and returns
-EBUSYinstead of-EINVAL. Was this intended? For what it's worth, I do agree with the changes, it's just that I think you could've made those in the earlier patch that introduced them.The message isn't really needed and EBUSY seems fit better than EINVAL here.
Quoted 2 lines
But this is all one series and the end result looks fine, so no need to be that picky.
Good, thanks.
Quoted 81 lines
Quoted 81 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +27
-32+ }else if (dev->archdata.iommu != domain) { + dev->archdata.iommu = domain; + gart->active_domain = domain; + gart->active_devices++; } -dev_err (gart->dev,"GART: Couldn't find %s to detach\n" , -dev_name (dev)); +spin_unlock (&gart->dom_lock); + +return ret; }static void gart_iommu_detach_dev (struct iommu_domain *domain,struct device *dev) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); -struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; +struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle; + +spin_lock (&gart->dom_lock); -spin_lock (&gart->client_lock); -__gart_iommu_detach_dev (domain, dev); -spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock); +if (dev->archdata.iommu == domain) { + dev->archdata.iommu =NULL ; + +if (--gart->active_devices ==0 ) + gart->active_domain =NULL ; + } + +spin_unlock (&gart->dom_lock); }static struct iommu_domain *gart_iommu_domain_alloc (unsigned type) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain; -struct gart_device *gart; +struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle; +struct iommu_domain *domain;if (type !=IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED )return NULL ; - gart = gart_handle; -if (!gart) -return NULL ; - - gart_domain =kzalloc (sizeof (*gart_domain),GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!gart_domain) -return NULL ; - - gart_domain->domain.geometry.aperture_start = gart->iovmm_base; - gart_domain->domain.geometry.aperture_end = gart->iovmm_base + + domain =kzalloc (sizeof (*domain),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (domain) { + domain->geometry.aperture_start = gart->iovmm_base; + domain->geometry.aperture_end = gart->iovmm_base + gart->page_count *GART_PAGE_SIZE -1 ; - gart_domain->domain.geometry.force_aperture = true; + domain->geometry.force_aperture = true; + } -return &gart_domain->domain; +return domain; }static void gart_iommu_domain_free (struct iommu_domain *domain) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); -struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; - -if (gart) { -spin_lock (&gart->client_lock); -if (!list_empty (&gart->client)) { -struct gart_client *c, *tmp; - -list_for_each_entry_safe (c, tmp, &gart->client, list) -__gart_iommu_detach_dev (domain, c->dev); - }Quoted 8 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c static inline bool gart_iova_range_valid(struct gart_device *gart, · line 210
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +1
-4-spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock); - } - -kfree (gart_domain); +kfree (domain); }Doesn't this now make it possible to free a potentially active domain?
Quoted 2 lines
Yes, don't do it. I can add a
WARN_ON()here, though I think IOMMU core should be the one taking care about that.
Yeah, might be good to have the WARN_ON() either here or in the IOMMU core. Force-detaching is probably a good idea, too, otherwise the users of the freed domain are just going to crash anyway, right? Maybe something to discuss more generally with Joerg.
I think in the meantime just having the WARN_ON() here is probably good enough. It should point out the cases where we do free the domain with devices still attached, which hopefully don't exist, and we can fix them.
Quoted 15 lines
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c static inline bool gart_iova_range_valid(struct gart_device *gart, · line 215
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +1
-2static int gart_iommu_map (struct iommu_domain *domain,unsigned long iova,phys_addr_t pa,size_t bytes,int prot) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); -struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; +struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle;Quoted 7 lines
Hmm... this now introduces more uses of the
gart_handlethat I hoped we could get rid of. I think we could still keep around structgart_domainand just make sure it is unique. The small amounts of casting here seem mostly harmless to me, especially since they will be nops, so we end up with just one dereference to get at the structgart_device. I think the benefits of not having this global variable around are worth the one dereference here.
Quoted 6 lines
What are the benefits? I don't see anything other than the pedantic oddity.
I've removed
gart_domainin the end because it is an extra code (and consumed resources) without any benefit. Let's keep that part as it is now. I'll be happy to change that code if you'll explain why it is worth it.
I thought I did explain. Anyway, it's always been like this, so no need to change it as part of this series.
Thierry
Re: [PATCH v4 19/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Simplify clients-tracking code
Quoted 246 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 237 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
Quoted 130 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 129 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
GART is a simple IOMMU provider that has single address space. There is no need to setup global clients list and manage it for tracking of the active domain, hence lot's of code could be safely removed and replaced with a simpler alternative.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 157 +++++++++---------------------------- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +4
-71@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@#include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/iommu.h> -#include <linux/list.h> #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/slab.h> @@ -42,30 +41,20 @@#define GART_PAGE_MASK \ (~(GART_PAGE_SIZE - 1) & ~GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID) -struct gart_client { -struct device *dev; -struct list_head list; -}; -struct gart_device {void __iomem *regs;u32 *savedata;u32 page_count;/* total remappable size */ dma_addr_t iovmm_base;/* offset to vmm_area */ spinlock_t pte_lock;/* for pagetable */ -struct list_head client; -spinlock_t client_lock;/* for client list */ +spinlock_t dom_lock;/* for active domain */ +unsigned int active_devices;/* number of active devices */ struct iommu_domain *active_domain;/* current active domain */ struct device *dev;struct iommu_device iommu;/* IOMMU Core handle */ }; -struct gart_domain { -struct iommu_domain domain;/* generic domain handle */ -struct gart_device *gart;/* link to gart device */ -}; -static struct gart_device *gart_handle;/* unique for a system */ static bool gart_debug;@@ -73,11 +62,6 @@ static bool gart_debug;#define GART_PTE (_pfn) \ (GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID | ((_pfn) << PAGE_SHIFT)) -static struct gart_domain *to_gart_domain (struct iommu_domain *dom) -{ - return container_of(dom, struct gart_domain, domain); -} -/* * Any interaction between any block on PPSB and a block on APB or AHB * must have these read-back to ensure the APB/AHB bus transaction is @@ -166,128 +150,69 @@ static inline bool gart_iova_range_valid(struct gart_device *gart,static int gart_iommu_attach_dev (struct iommu_domain *domain,struct device *dev) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain);struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle; -struct gart_client *client, *c; -int err =0 ; - - client =kzalloc (sizeof (*c),GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!client) -return -ENOMEM ; - client->dev = dev; - -spin_lock (&gart->client_lock); -list_for_each_entry (c, &gart->client, list) { -if (c->dev == dev) { -dev_err (gart->dev,"GART: %s is already attached\n" , -dev_name (dev)); - err = -EINVAL ; - goto fail; - } - } -if (gart->active_domain && gart->active_domain != domain) { -dev_err (gart->dev, -"GART: Only one domain can be active at a time\n" ); - err = -EINVAL ; - goto fail; - } - gart->active_domain = domain; - gart_domain->gart = gart; -list_add (&client->list, &gart->client); -spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock); -dev_dbg (gart->dev,"GART: Attached %s\n" ,dev_name (dev)); -return 0 ; +int ret =0 ; -fail: -kfree (client); -spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock); -return err; -} +spin_lock (&gart->dom_lock); -static void __gart_iommu_detach_dev (struct iommu_domain *domain, -struct device *dev) -{ -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); -struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; -struct gart_client *c; - -list_for_each_entry (c, &gart->client, list) { -if (c->dev == dev) { -list_del (&c->list); -kfree (c); -if (list_empty (&gart->client)) { - gart->active_domain =NULL ; - gart_domain->gart =NULL ; - } -dev_dbg (gart->dev,"GART: Detached %s\n" , -dev_name (dev)); -return ;Quoted 8 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c static inline bool gart_iova_range_valid(struct gart_device *gart, · line 159
Quoted 3 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +2
-1- } +if (gart->active_domain && gart->active_domain != domain) { + ret = -EBUSY ;This omits the error message and returns
-EBUSYinstead of-EINVAL. Was this intended? For what it's worth, I do agree with the changes, it's just that I think you could've made those in the earlier patch that introduced them.The message isn't really needed and EBUSY seems fit better than EINVAL here.
Quoted 2 lines
But this is all one series and the end result looks fine, so no need to be that picky.
Good, thanks.
Quoted 81 lines
Quoted 81 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +27
-32+ }else if (dev->archdata.iommu != domain) { + dev->archdata.iommu = domain; + gart->active_domain = domain; + gart->active_devices++; } -dev_err (gart->dev,"GART: Couldn't find %s to detach\n" , -dev_name (dev)); +spin_unlock (&gart->dom_lock); + +return ret; }static void gart_iommu_detach_dev (struct iommu_domain *domain,struct device *dev) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); -struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; +struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle; + +spin_lock (&gart->dom_lock); -spin_lock (&gart->client_lock); -__gart_iommu_detach_dev (domain, dev); -spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock); +if (dev->archdata.iommu == domain) { + dev->archdata.iommu =NULL ; + +if (--gart->active_devices ==0 ) + gart->active_domain =NULL ; + } + +spin_unlock (&gart->dom_lock); }static struct iommu_domain *gart_iommu_domain_alloc (unsigned type) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain; -struct gart_device *gart; +struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle; +struct iommu_domain *domain;if (type !=IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED )return NULL ; - gart = gart_handle; -if (!gart) -return NULL ; - - gart_domain =kzalloc (sizeof (*gart_domain),GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!gart_domain) -return NULL ; - - gart_domain->domain.geometry.aperture_start = gart->iovmm_base; - gart_domain->domain.geometry.aperture_end = gart->iovmm_base + + domain =kzalloc (sizeof (*domain),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (domain) { + domain->geometry.aperture_start = gart->iovmm_base; + domain->geometry.aperture_end = gart->iovmm_base + gart->page_count *GART_PAGE_SIZE -1 ; - gart_domain->domain.geometry.force_aperture = true; + domain->geometry.force_aperture = true; + } -return &gart_domain->domain; +return domain; }static void gart_iommu_domain_free (struct iommu_domain *domain) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); -struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; - -if (gart) { -spin_lock (&gart->client_lock); -if (!list_empty (&gart->client)) { -struct gart_client *c, *tmp; - -list_for_each_entry_safe (c, tmp, &gart->client, list) -__gart_iommu_detach_dev (domain, c->dev); - }Quoted 8 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c static inline bool gart_iova_range_valid(struct gart_device *gart, · line 210
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +1
-4-spin_unlock (&gart->client_lock); - } - -kfree (gart_domain); +kfree (domain); }Doesn't this now make it possible to free a potentially active domain?
Quoted 2 lines
Yes, don't do it. I can add a
WARN_ON()here, though I think IOMMU core should be the one taking care about that.Yeah, might be good to have the
WARN_ON()either here or in the IOMMU core. Force-detaching is probably a good idea, too, otherwise the users of the freed domain are just going to crash anyway, right? Maybe something to discuss more generally with Joerg.
Quoted 4 lines
I think in the meantime just having the
WARN_ON()here is probably good enough. It should point out the cases where we do free the domain with devices still attached, which hopefully don't exist, and we can fix them.
Ok.
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c static inline bool gart_iova_range_valid(struct gart_device *gart, · line 215
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +1
-2static int gart_iommu_map (struct iommu_domain *domain,unsigned long iova,phys_addr_t pa,size_t bytes,int prot) { -struct gart_domain *gart_domain =to_gart_domain (domain); -struct gart_device *gart = gart_domain->gart; +struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle;Quoted 7 lines
Hmm... this now introduces more uses of the
gart_handlethat I hoped we could get rid of. I think we could still keep around structgart_domainand just make sure it is unique. The small amounts of casting here seem mostly harmless to me, especially since they will be nops, so we end up with just one dereference to get at the structgart_device. I think the benefits of not having this global variable around are worth the one dereference here.What are the benefits? I don't see anything other than the pedantic oddity.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
I've removed
gart_domainin the end because it is an extra code (and consumed resources) without any benefit. Let's keep that part as it is now. I'll be happy to change that code if you'll explain why it is worth it.I thought I did explain. Anyway, it's always been like this, so no need to change it as part of this series.
Thanks.
You're saying that you want to get rid of the global variable, but you're not saying why. Usage of global variable is more appealing with the current driver structure.
PATCH v4 20/20 iommu/tegra: gart: Perform code refactoring
In reply to Dmitry OsipenkoPerform a major code cleanup to make it more readable and as a result easier to maintain. I removed some redundant safety-checks in the code and some debug code that isn't actually very useful for debugging, like enormous pagetable dump on each fault. The majority of the changes are code reshuffling, variables/whitespaces clean up and removal of debug messages that duplicate messages of the IOMMU-core.
--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 215 +++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-)
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +84 -131
@@ -34,63 +34,56 @@#define GART_CONFIG (0x24 - GART_REG_BASE)#define GART_ENTRY_ADDR (0x28 - GART_REG_BASE)#define GART_ENTRY_DATA (0x2c - GART_REG_BASE) -#define GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID (1 << 31) + +#define GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID BIT(31)#define GART_PAGE_SHIFT 12#define GART_PAGE_SIZE (1 << GART_PAGE_SHIFT) -#define GART_PAGE_MASK \ - (~(GART_PAGE_SIZE - 1) & ~GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID) +#define GART_PAGE_MASK GENMASK(30, GART_PAGE_SHIFT)struct gart_device {void __iomem *regs;u32 *savedata; -u32 page_count;/* total remappable size */ -dma_addr_t iovmm_base;/* offset to vmm_area */ +unsigned long iovmm_base;/* offset to vmm_area start */ +unsigned long iovmm_end;/* offset to vmm_area end */ spinlock_t pte_lock;/* for pagetable */ spinlock_t dom_lock;/* for active domain */ unsigned int active_devices;/* number of active devices */ struct iommu_domain *active_domain;/* current active domain */ -struct device *dev; -struct iommu_device iommu;/* IOMMU Core handle */ +struct device *dev; };static struct gart_device *gart_handle;/* unique for a system */ static bool gart_debug; -#define GART_PTE (_pfn) \ - (GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID | ((_pfn) << PAGE_SHIFT)) -/* * Any interaction between any block on PPSB and a block on APB or AHB * must have these read-back to ensure the APB/AHB bus transaction is * complete before initiating activity on the PPSB block. */ -#define FLUSH_GART_REGS (gart) ((void)readl((gart)->regs + GART_CONFIG)) +#define FLUSH_GART_REGS (gart) readl_relaxed((gart)->regs + GART_CONFIG)#define for_each_gart_pte (gart, iova) \ for (iova = gart->iovmm_base; \ - iova < gart->iovmm_base + GART_PAGE_SIZE * gart->page_count; \ + iova < gart->iovmm_end; \ iova += GART_PAGE_SIZE)static inline void gart_set_pte (struct gart_device *gart, -unsigned long offs,u32 pte) +unsigned long iova,phys_addr_t pte) { -writel (offs, gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_ADDR ); -writel (pte, gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_DATA ); - -dev_dbg (gart->dev,"GART: %s %08lx:%08x\n" , - pte ?"map" :"unmap" , offs, pte &GART_PAGE_MASK ); +writel_relaxed (iova, gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_ADDR ); +writel_relaxed (pte, gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_DATA ); }static inline unsigned long gart_read_pte (struct gart_device *gart, -unsigned long offs) +unsigned long iova) {unsigned long pte; -writel (offs, gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_ADDR ); - pte =readl (gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_DATA ); +writel_relaxed (iova, gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_ADDR ); + pte =readl_relaxed (gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_DATA );return pte; }
@@ -102,49 +95,20 @@ static void do_gart_setup(struct gart_device *gart, const u32 *data)for_each_gart_pte (gart, iova)gart_set_pte (gart, iova, data ? *(data++) :0 ); -writel (1 , gart->regs +GART_CONFIG ); +writel_relaxed (1 , gart->regs +GART_CONFIG );FLUSH_GART_REGS (gart); } -#ifdef DEBUG -static void gart_dump_table (struct gart_device *gart) +static inline bool gart_iova_range_invalid (struct gart_device *gart, +unsigned long iova,size_t bytes) { -unsigned long iova; -unsigned long flags; - -spin_lock_irqsave (&gart->pte_lock, flags); -for_each_gart_pte (gart, iova) { -unsigned long pte; - - pte =gart_read_pte (gart, iova); - -dev_dbg (gart->dev,"GART: %s %08lx:%08lx\n" , - (GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID & pte) ?"v" :" " , - iova, pte &GART_PAGE_MASK ); - } -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags); +return unlikely (iova < gart->iovmm_base || bytes !=GART_PAGE_SIZE || + iova + bytes > gart->iovmm_end); } -#else -static inline void gart_dump_table (struct gart_device *gart) -{ -} -#endif -static inline bool gart_iova_range_valid (struct gart_device *gart, -unsigned long iova,size_t bytes) +static inline bool gart_pte_valid (struct gart_device *gart,unsigned long iova) { -unsigned long iova_start, iova_end, gart_start, gart_end; - - iova_start = iova; - iova_end = iova_start + bytes -1 ; - gart_start = gart->iovmm_base; - gart_end = gart_start + gart->page_count *GART_PAGE_SIZE -1 ; - -if (iova_start < gart_start) -return false; -if (iova_end > gart_end) -return false; -return true; +return !!(gart_read_pte (gart, iova) &GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID ); } static int gart_iommu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,
@@ -187,7 +151,6 @@ static void gart_iommu_detach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,static struct iommu_domain *gart_iommu_domain_alloc (unsigned type) { -struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle;struct iommu_domain *domain;if (type !=IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED )
@@ -195,9 +158,8 @@ static struct iommu_domain *gart_iommu_domain_alloc(unsigned type) domain =kzalloc (sizeof (*domain),GFP_KERNEL );if (domain) { - domain->geometry.aperture_start = gart->iovmm_base; - domain->geometry.aperture_end = gart->iovmm_base + - gart->page_count *GART_PAGE_SIZE -1 ; + domain->geometry.aperture_start = gart_handle->iovmm_base; + domain->geometry.aperture_end = gart_handle->iovmm_end -1 ; domain->geometry.force_aperture = true; }
@@ -209,34 +171,44 @@ static void gart_iommu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)kfree (domain); } +static int __gart_iommu_map (struct gart_device *gart,unsigned long iova, +phys_addr_t pa) +{ +if (unlikely (gart_debug &&gart_pte_valid (gart, iova))) { +dev_WARN (gart->dev,"GART: Page entry is in-use\n" ); +return -EINVAL ; + } + +gart_set_pte (gart, iova,GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID | pa); + +return 0 ; +} +static int gart_iommu_map (struct iommu_domain *domain,unsigned long iova,phys_addr_t pa,size_t bytes,int prot) {struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle; -unsigned long flags; -unsigned long pfn; -unsigned long pte; +int ret; -if (!gart_iova_range_valid (gart, iova, bytes)) +if (gart_iova_range_invalid (gart, iova, bytes))return -EINVAL ; -spin_lock_irqsave (&gart->pte_lock, flags); - pfn =__phys_to_pfn (pa); -if (!pfn_valid (pfn)) { -dev_err (gart->dev,"GART: Invalid page: %pa\n" , &pa); -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags); +spin_lock (&gart->pte_lock); + ret =__gart_iommu_map (gart, iova, pa); +spin_unlock (&gart->pte_lock); + +return ret; +} + +static int __gart_iommu_unmap (struct gart_device *gart,unsigned long iova) +{ +if (unlikely (gart_debug && !gart_pte_valid (gart, iova))) { +dev_WARN (gart->dev,"GART: Page entry is invalid\n" );return -EINVAL ; } -if (gart_debug) { - pte =gart_read_pte (gart, iova); -if (pte &GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID ) { -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags); -dev_err (gart->dev,"GART: Page entry is in-use\n" ); -return -EBUSY ; - } - } -gart_set_pte (gart, iova,GART_PTE (pfn)); -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags); + +gart_set_pte (gart, iova,0 ); +return 0 ; }
@@ -244,15 +216,16 @@ static size_t gart_iommu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova, size_t bytes) {struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle; -unsigned long flags; +int err; -if (!gart_iova_range_valid (gart, iova, bytes)) +if (gart_iova_range_invalid (gart, iova, bytes))return 0 ; -spin_lock_irqsave (&gart->pte_lock, flags); -gart_set_pte (gart, iova,0 ); -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags); -return bytes; +spin_lock (&gart->pte_lock); + err =__gart_iommu_unmap (gart, iova); +spin_unlock (&gart->pte_lock); + +return err ?0 : bytes; } static phys_addr_t gart_iommu_iova_to_phys(struct iommu_domain *domain,
@@ -260,24 +233,15 @@ static phys_addr_t gart_iommu_iova_to_phys(struct iommu_domain *domain, {struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle;unsigned long pte; -phys_addr_t pa; -unsigned long flags; -if (!gart_iova_range_valid (gart, iova,0 )) +if (gart_iova_range_invalid (gart, iova,SZ_4K ))return -EINVAL ; -spin_lock_irqsave (&gart->pte_lock, flags); +spin_lock (&gart->pte_lock); pte =gart_read_pte (gart, iova); -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags); +spin_unlock (&gart->pte_lock); - pa = (pte &GART_PAGE_MASK ); -if (!pfn_valid (__phys_to_pfn (pa))) { -dev_err (gart->dev,"GART: No entry for %08llx:%pa\n" , - (unsigned long long )iova, &pa); -gart_dump_table (gart); -return -EINVAL ; - } -return pa; +return pte &GART_PAGE_MASK ; }static bool gart_iommu_capable (enum iommu_cap cap)
@@ -342,24 +306,19 @@ static const struct iommu_ops gart_iommu_ops = {int tegra_gart_suspend (struct gart_device *gart) { -unsigned long iova;u32 *data = gart->savedata; -unsigned long flags; +unsigned long iova; -spin_lock_irqsave (&gart->pte_lock, flags);for_each_gart_pte (gart, iova) *(data++) =gart_read_pte (gart, iova); -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags); +return 0 ; }int tegra_gart_resume (struct gart_device *gart) { -unsigned long flags; - -spin_lock_irqsave (&gart->pte_lock, flags);do_gart_setup (gart, gart->savedata); -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags); +return 0 ; }
@@ -368,8 +327,7 @@ struct gart_device *tegra_gart_probe(struct device *dev, struct tegra_mc *mc) {struct gart_device *gart; -struct resource *res_remap; -void __iomem *gart_regs; +struct resource *res;int ret;BUILD_BUG_ON (PAGE_SHIFT !=GART_PAGE_SHIFT );
@@ -379,9 +337,8 @@ struct gart_device *tegra_gart_probe(struct device *dev,return NULL ;/* the GART memory aperture is required */ - res_remap =platform_get_resource (to_platform_device (dev), -IORESOURCE_MEM ,1 ); -if (!res_remap) { + res =platform_get_resource (to_platform_device (dev),IORESOURCE_MEM ,1 ); +if (!res) {dev_err (dev,"GART: Memory aperture resource unavailable\n" );return ERR_PTR (-ENXIO ); }
@@ -390,39 +347,35 @@ struct gart_device *tegra_gart_probe(struct device *dev,if (!gart)return ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); + gart_handle = gart; + + gart->dev = dev; + gart->regs = mc->regs +GART_REG_BASE ; + gart->iovmm_base = res->start; + gart->iovmm_end = res->start +resource_size (res); +spin_lock_init (&gart->pte_lock); +spin_lock_init (&gart->dom_lock); + +do_gart_setup (gart,NULL ); + ret =iommu_device_sysfs_add (&gart->iommu, dev,NULL ,"gart" ); -if (ret) { -dev_err (dev,"GART: Failed to register IOMMU sysfs\n" ); +if (ret) goto free_gart; - }iommu_device_set_ops (&gart->iommu, &gart_iommu_ops);iommu_device_set_fwnode (&gart->iommu, dev->fwnode); ret =iommu_device_register (&gart->iommu); -if (ret) { -dev_err (dev,"GART: Failed to register IOMMU\n" ); +if (ret) goto remove_sysfs; - } - gart->dev = dev; - gart_regs = mc->regs +GART_REG_BASE ; -spin_lock_init (&gart->pte_lock); -spin_lock_init (&gart->dom_lock); - gart->regs = gart_regs; - gart->iovmm_base = (dma_addr_t )res_remap->start; - gart->page_count = (resource_size (res_remap) >>GART_PAGE_SHIFT ); - - gart->savedata =vmalloc (array_size (sizeof (u32), gart->page_count)); + gart->savedata =vmalloc (resource_size (res) /GART_PAGE_SIZE * +sizeof (u32));if (!gart->savedata) { ret = -ENOMEM ; goto unregister_iommu; } -do_gart_setup (gart,NULL ); - - gart_handle = gart; -return gart; unregister_iommu:
Signature · 1 line
2.19.0
Re: [PATCH v4 20/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Perform code refactoring
Quoted 11 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
Perform a major code cleanup to make it more readable and as a result easier to maintain. I removed some redundant safety-checks in the code and some debug code that isn't actually very useful for debugging, like enormous pagetable dump on each fault. The majority of the changes are code reshuffling, variables/whitespaces clean up and removal of debug messages that duplicate messages of the IOMMU-core.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 215 +++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-)
While I'm not strongly opposed to this, it's an awful lot of churn for little to no gain. Yes, this driver may have its weak points in some areas, but I don't think it's totally unreadable or unmaintainable. Also, keep in mind that readability is very subjective.
If you set out to rewrite every piece of code in the kernel that you think is unreadable, I don't think you'll end up a happy person.
Quoted 49 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +7
-11@@ -34,63 +34,56 @@#define GART_CONFIG (0x24 - GART_REG_BASE)#define GART_ENTRY_ADDR (0x28 - GART_REG_BASE)#define GART_ENTRY_DATA (0x2c - GART_REG_BASE) -#define GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID (1 << 31) + +#define GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID BIT(31)#define GART_PAGE_SHIFT 12#define GART_PAGE_SIZE (1 << GART_PAGE_SHIFT) -#define GART_PAGE_MASK \ - (~(GART_PAGE_SIZE - 1) & ~GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID) +#define GART_PAGE_MASK GENMASK(30, GART_PAGE_SHIFT)struct gart_device {void __iomem *regs;u32 *savedata; -u32 page_count;/* total remappable size */ -dma_addr_t iovmm_base;/* offset to vmm_area */ +unsigned long iovmm_base;/* offset to vmm_area start */ +unsigned long iovmm_end;/* offset to vmm_area end */ spinlock_t pte_lock;/* for pagetable */ spinlock_t dom_lock;/* for active domain */ unsigned int active_devices;/* number of active devices */ struct iommu_domain *active_domain;/* current active domain */ -struct device *dev; -struct iommu_device iommu;/* IOMMU Core handle */ +struct device *dev; };static struct gart_device *gart_handle;/* unique for a system */ static bool gart_debug; -#define GART_PTE (_pfn) \ - (GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID | ((_pfn) << PAGE_SHIFT)) -/* * Any interaction between any block on PPSB and a block on APB or AHB * must have these read-back to ensure the APB/AHB bus transaction is * complete before initiating activity on the PPSB block. */ -#define FLUSH_GART_REGS (gart) ((void)readl((gart)->regs + GART_CONFIG)) +#define FLUSH_GART_REGS (gart) readl_relaxed((gart)->regs + GART_CONFIG)
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c line 74
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +2
-2#define for_each_gart_pte (gart, iova) \ for (iova = gart->iovmm_base; \ - iova < gart->iovmm_base + GART_PAGE_SIZE * gart->page_count; \ + iova < gart->iovmm_end; \ iova += GART_PAGE_SIZE)static inline void gart_set_pte (struct gart_device *gart, -unsigned long offs,u32 pte) +unsigned long iova,phys_addr_t pte)
I don't think this makes sense. phys_addr_t can be 64-bit and actually will be in the majority of multi-platform builds. iova being unsigned long is borderline, but probably fine since this driver is exclusive to 32-bit builds.
I think it'd be better to make sure elsewhere that only valid, 32-bit values are passed in here and return an error at a higher level if that's not the case. Silently casting away the upper 32 bits in the writel_relaxed() below is suboptimal. Even if we don't care about the type mismatch because Tegra20 doesn't have LPAE and therefore the upper 32 bits will always be 0 and the cast is in fact safe, I think we should be explicitly casting at some point, and I think it should be at a higher level than gart_set_pte().
Quoted 219 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +54
-86{ -writel (offs, gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_ADDR ); -writel (pte, gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_DATA ); - -dev_dbg (gart->dev,"GART: %s %08lx:%08x\n" , - pte ?"map" :"unmap" , offs, pte &GART_PAGE_MASK ); +writel_relaxed (iova, gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_ADDR ); +writel_relaxed (pte, gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_DATA ); }static inline unsigned long gart_read_pte (struct gart_device *gart, -unsigned long offs) +unsigned long iova) {unsigned long pte; -writel (offs, gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_ADDR ); - pte =readl (gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_DATA ); +writel_relaxed (iova, gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_ADDR ); + pte =readl_relaxed (gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_DATA );return pte; }@@ -102,49 +95,20 @@ static void do_gart_setup(struct gart_device *gart, const u32 *data)for_each_gart_pte (gart, iova)gart_set_pte (gart, iova, data ? *(data++) :0 ); -writel (1 , gart->regs +GART_CONFIG ); +writel_relaxed (1 , gart->regs +GART_CONFIG );FLUSH_GART_REGS (gart); } -#ifdef DEBUG -static void gart_dump_table (struct gart_device *gart) +static inline bool gart_iova_range_invalid (struct gart_device *gart, +unsigned long iova,size_t bytes) { -unsigned long iova; -unsigned long flags; - -spin_lock_irqsave (&gart->pte_lock, flags); -for_each_gart_pte (gart, iova) { -unsigned long pte; - - pte =gart_read_pte (gart, iova); - -dev_dbg (gart->dev,"GART: %s %08lx:%08lx\n" , - (GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID & pte) ?"v" :" " , - iova, pte &GART_PAGE_MASK ); - } -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags); +return unlikely (iova < gart->iovmm_base || bytes !=GART_PAGE_SIZE || + iova + bytes > gart->iovmm_end); } -#else -static inline void gart_dump_table (struct gart_device *gart) -{ -} -#endif -static inline bool gart_iova_range_valid (struct gart_device *gart, -unsigned long iova,size_t bytes) +static inline bool gart_pte_valid (struct gart_device *gart,unsigned long iova) { -unsigned long iova_start, iova_end, gart_start, gart_end; - - iova_start = iova; - iova_end = iova_start + bytes -1 ; - gart_start = gart->iovmm_base; - gart_end = gart_start + gart->page_count *GART_PAGE_SIZE -1 ; - -if (iova_start < gart_start) -return false; -if (iova_end > gart_end) -return false; -return true; +return !!(gart_read_pte (gart, iova) &GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID ); } static int gart_iommu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,@@ -187,7 +151,6 @@ static void gart_iommu_detach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,static struct iommu_domain *gart_iommu_domain_alloc (unsigned type) { -struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle;struct iommu_domain *domain;if (type !=IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED )@@ -195,9 +158,8 @@ static struct iommu_domain *gart_iommu_domain_alloc(unsigned type) domain =kzalloc (sizeof (*domain),GFP_KERNEL );if (domain) { - domain->geometry.aperture_start = gart->iovmm_base; - domain->geometry.aperture_end = gart->iovmm_base + - gart->page_count *GART_PAGE_SIZE -1 ; + domain->geometry.aperture_start = gart_handle->iovmm_base; + domain->geometry.aperture_end = gart_handle->iovmm_end -1 ; domain->geometry.force_aperture = true; }@@ -209,34 +171,44 @@ static void gart_iommu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)kfree (domain); } +static int __gart_iommu_map (struct gart_device *gart,unsigned long iova, +phys_addr_t pa) +{ +if (unlikely (gart_debug &&gart_pte_valid (gart, iova))) { +dev_WARN (gart->dev,"GART: Page entry is in-use\n" ); +return -EINVAL ; + } + +gart_set_pte (gart, iova,GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID | pa); + +return 0 ; +} +static int gart_iommu_map (struct iommu_domain *domain,unsigned long iova,phys_addr_t pa,size_t bytes,int prot) {struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle; -unsigned long flags; -unsigned long pfn; -unsigned long pte; +int ret; -if (!gart_iova_range_valid (gart, iova, bytes)) +if (gart_iova_range_invalid (gart, iova, bytes))return -EINVAL ; -spin_lock_irqsave (&gart->pte_lock, flags); - pfn =__phys_to_pfn (pa); -if (!pfn_valid (pfn)) { -dev_err (gart->dev,"GART: Invalid page: %pa\n" , &pa); -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags); +spin_lock (&gart->pte_lock); + ret =__gart_iommu_map (gart, iova, pa); +spin_unlock (&gart->pte_lock); + +return ret; +} + +static int __gart_iommu_unmap (struct gart_device *gart,unsigned long iova) +{ +if (unlikely (gart_debug && !gart_pte_valid (gart, iova))) { +dev_WARN (gart->dev,"GART: Page entry is invalid\n" );return -EINVAL ; } -if (gart_debug) { - pte =gart_read_pte (gart, iova); -if (pte &GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID ) { -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags); -dev_err (gart->dev,"GART: Page entry is in-use\n" ); -return -EBUSY ; - } - } -gart_set_pte (gart, iova,GART_PTE (pfn)); -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags); + +gart_set_pte (gart, iova,0 ); +return 0 ; }@@ -244,15 +216,16 @@ static size_t gart_iommu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova, size_t bytes) {struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle; -unsigned long flags; +int err; -if (!gart_iova_range_valid (gart, iova, bytes)) +if (gart_iova_range_invalid (gart, iova, bytes))return 0 ; -spin_lock_irqsave (&gart->pte_lock, flags); -gart_set_pte (gart, iova,0 ); -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags); -return bytes; +spin_lock (&gart->pte_lock); + err =__gart_iommu_unmap (gart, iova); +spin_unlock (&gart->pte_lock); + +return err ?0 : bytes; } static phys_addr_t gart_iommu_iova_to_phys(struct iommu_domain *domain,@@ -260,24 +233,15 @@ static phys_addr_t gart_iommu_iova_to_phys(struct iommu_domain *domain, {struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle;unsigned long pte; -phys_addr_t pa; -unsigned long flags; -if (!gart_iova_range_valid (gart, iova,0 )) +if (gart_iova_range_invalid (gart, iova,SZ_4K ))return -EINVAL ; -spin_lock_irqsave (&gart->pte_lock, flags); +spin_lock (&gart->pte_lock); pte =gart_read_pte (gart, iova); -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags); +spin_unlock (&gart->pte_lock); - pa = (pte &GART_PAGE_MASK ); -if (!pfn_valid (__phys_to_pfn (pa))) { -dev_err (gart->dev,"GART: No entry for %08llx:%pa\n" , - (unsigned long long )iova, &pa); -gart_dump_table (gart); -return -EINVAL ; - } -return pa; +return pte &GART_PAGE_MASK ; }static bool gart_iommu_capable (enum iommu_cap cap)@@ -342,24 +306,19 @@ static const struct iommu_ops gart_iommu_ops = {int tegra_gart_suspend (struct gart_device *gart)
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c static const struct iommu_ops gart_iommu_ops = { · line 352
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +1
-4{ -unsigned long iova;u32 *data = gart->savedata; -unsigned long flags; +unsigned long iova; -spin_lock_irqsave (&gart->pte_lock, flags);for_each_gart_pte (gart, iova) *(data++) =gart_read_pte (gart, iova); -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags);
Why is it safe to remove the lock here?
Quoted 38 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +5
-9+return 0 ; }int tegra_gart_resume (struct gart_device *gart) { -unsigned long flags; - -spin_lock_irqsave (&gart->pte_lock, flags);do_gart_setup (gart, gart->savedata); -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags); +return 0 ; }@@ -368,8 +327,7 @@ struct gart_device *tegra_gart_probe(struct device *dev, struct tegra_mc *mc) {struct gart_device *gart; -struct resource *res_remap; -void __iomem *gart_regs; +struct resource *res;int ret;BUILD_BUG_ON (PAGE_SHIFT !=GART_PAGE_SHIFT );@@ -379,9 +337,8 @@ struct gart_device *tegra_gart_probe(struct device *dev,return NULL ;/* the GART memory aperture is required */ - res_remap =platform_get_resource (to_platform_device (dev), -IORESOURCE_MEM ,1 ); -if (!res_remap) { + res =platform_get_resource (to_platform_device (dev),IORESOURCE_MEM ,1 ); +if (!res) {dev_err (dev,"GART: Memory aperture resource unavailable\n" );return ERR_PTR (-ENXIO ); }
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c struct gart_device *tegra_gart_probe(struct device *dev, · line 355
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +6
-0@@ -390,39 +347,35 @@ struct gart_device *tegra_gart_probe(struct device *dev,if (!gart)return ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); + gart_handle = gart; + + gart->dev = dev; + gart->regs = mc->regs +GART_REG_BASE ; + gart->iovmm_base = res->start; + gart->iovmm_end = res->start +resource_size (res);
Why not simply:
gart->iovmm_end = res->end;
?
Thierry
Re: [PATCH v4 20/20] iommu/tegra: gart: Perform code refactoring
Quoted 13 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 11 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
Perform a major code cleanup to make it more readable and as a result easier to maintain. I removed some redundant safety-checks in the code and some debug code that isn't actually very useful for debugging, like enormous pagetable dump on each fault. The majority of the changes are code reshuffling, variables/whitespaces clean up and removal of debug messages that duplicate messages of the IOMMU-core.
Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c | 215 +++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-)
Quoted 4 lines
While I'm not strongly opposed to this, it's an awful lot of churn for little to no gain. Yes, this driver may have its weak points in some areas, but I don't think it's totally unreadable or unmaintainable. Also, keep in mind that readability is very subjective.
I never said or meant that the code is "totally unreadable or unmaintainable". The code is okay, but it could be better and I'm trying to make it so since I'm already touching it.
Quoted 2 lines
If you set out to rewrite every piece of code in the kernel that you think is unreadable, I don't think you'll end up a happy person.
You're certainly getting a wrong impression about me. Though I wouldn't mind if some other Tegra driver will finally get a major rewrite ;)
Quoted 65 lines
Quoted 49 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +7
-11@@ -34,63 +34,56 @@#define GART_CONFIG (0x24 - GART_REG_BASE)#define GART_ENTRY_ADDR (0x28 - GART_REG_BASE)#define GART_ENTRY_DATA (0x2c - GART_REG_BASE) -#define GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID (1 << 31) + +#define GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID BIT(31)#define GART_PAGE_SHIFT 12#define GART_PAGE_SIZE (1 << GART_PAGE_SHIFT) -#define GART_PAGE_MASK \ - (~(GART_PAGE_SIZE - 1) & ~GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID) +#define GART_PAGE_MASK GENMASK(30, GART_PAGE_SHIFT)struct gart_device {void __iomem *regs;u32 *savedata; -u32 page_count;/* total remappable size */ -dma_addr_t iovmm_base;/* offset to vmm_area */ +unsigned long iovmm_base;/* offset to vmm_area start */ +unsigned long iovmm_end;/* offset to vmm_area end */ spinlock_t pte_lock;/* for pagetable */ spinlock_t dom_lock;/* for active domain */ unsigned int active_devices;/* number of active devices */ struct iommu_domain *active_domain;/* current active domain */ -struct device *dev; -struct iommu_device iommu;/* IOMMU Core handle */ +struct device *dev; };static struct gart_device *gart_handle;/* unique for a system */ static bool gart_debug; -#define GART_PTE (_pfn) \ - (GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID | ((_pfn) << PAGE_SHIFT)) -/* * Any interaction between any block on PPSB and a block on APB or AHB * must have these read-back to ensure the APB/AHB bus transaction is * complete before initiating activity on the PPSB block. */ -#define FLUSH_GART_REGS (gart) ((void)readl((gart)->regs + GART_CONFIG)) +#define FLUSH_GART_REGS (gart) readl_relaxed((gart)->regs + GART_CONFIG)drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c line 74
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +2
-2#define for_each_gart_pte (gart, iova) \ for (iova = gart->iovmm_base; \ - iova < gart->iovmm_base + GART_PAGE_SIZE * gart->page_count; \ + iova < gart->iovmm_end; \ iova += GART_PAGE_SIZE)static inline void gart_set_pte (struct gart_device *gart, -unsigned long offs,u32 pte) +unsigned long iova,phys_addr_t pte)I don't think this makes sense.
phys_addr_tcan be 64-bit and actually will be in the majority of multi-platform builds. iova being unsigned long is borderline, but probably fine since this driver is exclusive to 32-bit builds.
Quoted 8 lines
I think it'd be better to make sure elsewhere that only valid, 32-bit values are passed in here and return an error at a higher level if that's not the case. Silently casting away the upper 32 bits in the
writel_relaxed()below is suboptimal. Even if we don't care about the type mismatch because Tegra20 doesn't have LPAE and therefore the upper 32 bits will always be 0 and the cast is in fact safe, I think we should be explicitly casting at some point, and I think it should be at a higher level thangart_set_pte().
I'll add an explicit casting to ulong, like other drivers do. Thanks for the suggestion.
Quoted 225 lines
Quoted 225 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +55
-88{ -writel (offs, gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_ADDR ); -writel (pte, gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_DATA ); - -dev_dbg (gart->dev,"GART: %s %08lx:%08x\n" , - pte ?"map" :"unmap" , offs, pte &GART_PAGE_MASK ); +writel_relaxed (iova, gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_ADDR ); +writel_relaxed (pte, gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_DATA ); }static inline unsigned long gart_read_pte (struct gart_device *gart, -unsigned long offs) +unsigned long iova) {unsigned long pte; -writel (offs, gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_ADDR ); - pte =readl (gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_DATA ); +writel_relaxed (iova, gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_ADDR ); + pte =readl_relaxed (gart->regs +GART_ENTRY_DATA );return pte; }@@ -102,49 +95,20 @@ static void do_gart_setup(struct gart_device *gart, const u32 *data)for_each_gart_pte (gart, iova)gart_set_pte (gart, iova, data ? *(data++) :0 ); -writel (1 , gart->regs +GART_CONFIG ); +writel_relaxed (1 , gart->regs +GART_CONFIG );FLUSH_GART_REGS (gart); } -#ifdef DEBUG -static void gart_dump_table (struct gart_device *gart) +static inline bool gart_iova_range_invalid (struct gart_device *gart, +unsigned long iova,size_t bytes) { -unsigned long iova; -unsigned long flags; - -spin_lock_irqsave (&gart->pte_lock, flags); -for_each_gart_pte (gart, iova) { -unsigned long pte; - - pte =gart_read_pte (gart, iova); - -dev_dbg (gart->dev,"GART: %s %08lx:%08lx\n" , - (GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID & pte) ?"v" :" " , - iova, pte &GART_PAGE_MASK ); - } -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags); +return unlikely (iova < gart->iovmm_base || bytes !=GART_PAGE_SIZE || + iova + bytes > gart->iovmm_end); } -#else -static inline void gart_dump_table (struct gart_device *gart) -{ -} -#endif -static inline bool gart_iova_range_valid (struct gart_device *gart, -unsigned long iova,size_t bytes) +static inline bool gart_pte_valid (struct gart_device *gart,unsigned long iova) { -unsigned long iova_start, iova_end, gart_start, gart_end; - - iova_start = iova; - iova_end = iova_start + bytes -1 ; - gart_start = gart->iovmm_base; - gart_end = gart_start + gart->page_count *GART_PAGE_SIZE -1 ; - -if (iova_start < gart_start) -return false; -if (iova_end > gart_end) -return false; -return true; +return !!(gart_read_pte (gart, iova) &GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID ); } static int gart_iommu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,@@ -187,7 +151,6 @@ static void gart_iommu_detach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain,static struct iommu_domain *gart_iommu_domain_alloc (unsigned type) { -struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle;struct iommu_domain *domain;if (type !=IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED )@@ -195,9 +158,8 @@ static struct iommu_domain *gart_iommu_domain_alloc(unsigned type) domain =kzalloc (sizeof (*domain),GFP_KERNEL );if (domain) { - domain->geometry.aperture_start = gart->iovmm_base; - domain->geometry.aperture_end = gart->iovmm_base + - gart->page_count *GART_PAGE_SIZE -1 ; + domain->geometry.aperture_start = gart_handle->iovmm_base; + domain->geometry.aperture_end = gart_handle->iovmm_end -1 ; domain->geometry.force_aperture = true; }@@ -209,34 +171,44 @@ static void gart_iommu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)kfree (domain); } +static int __gart_iommu_map (struct gart_device *gart,unsigned long iova, +phys_addr_t pa) +{ +if (unlikely (gart_debug &&gart_pte_valid (gart, iova))) { +dev_WARN (gart->dev,"GART: Page entry is in-use\n" ); +return -EINVAL ; + } + +gart_set_pte (gart, iova,GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID | pa); + +return 0 ; +} +static int gart_iommu_map (struct iommu_domain *domain,unsigned long iova,phys_addr_t pa,size_t bytes,int prot) {struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle; -unsigned long flags; -unsigned long pfn; -unsigned long pte; +int ret; -if (!gart_iova_range_valid (gart, iova, bytes)) +if (gart_iova_range_invalid (gart, iova, bytes))return -EINVAL ; -spin_lock_irqsave (&gart->pte_lock, flags); - pfn =__phys_to_pfn (pa); -if (!pfn_valid (pfn)) { -dev_err (gart->dev,"GART: Invalid page: %pa\n" , &pa); -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags); +spin_lock (&gart->pte_lock); + ret =__gart_iommu_map (gart, iova, pa); +spin_unlock (&gart->pte_lock); + +return ret; +} + +static int __gart_iommu_unmap (struct gart_device *gart,unsigned long iova) +{ +if (unlikely (gart_debug && !gart_pte_valid (gart, iova))) { +dev_WARN (gart->dev,"GART: Page entry is invalid\n" );return -EINVAL ; } -if (gart_debug) { - pte =gart_read_pte (gart, iova); -if (pte &GART_ENTRY_PHYS_ADDR_VALID ) { -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags); -dev_err (gart->dev,"GART: Page entry is in-use\n" ); -return -EBUSY ; - } - } -gart_set_pte (gart, iova,GART_PTE (pfn)); -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags); + +gart_set_pte (gart, iova,0 ); +return 0 ; }@@ -244,15 +216,16 @@ static size_t gart_iommu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova, size_t bytes) {struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle; -unsigned long flags; +int err; -if (!gart_iova_range_valid (gart, iova, bytes)) +if (gart_iova_range_invalid (gart, iova, bytes))return 0 ; -spin_lock_irqsave (&gart->pte_lock, flags); -gart_set_pte (gart, iova,0 ); -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags); -return bytes; +spin_lock (&gart->pte_lock); + err =__gart_iommu_unmap (gart, iova); +spin_unlock (&gart->pte_lock); + +return err ?0 : bytes; } static phys_addr_t gart_iommu_iova_to_phys(struct iommu_domain *domain,@@ -260,24 +233,15 @@ static phys_addr_t gart_iommu_iova_to_phys(struct iommu_domain *domain, {struct gart_device *gart = gart_handle;unsigned long pte; -phys_addr_t pa; -unsigned long flags; -if (!gart_iova_range_valid (gart, iova,0 )) +if (gart_iova_range_invalid (gart, iova,SZ_4K ))return -EINVAL ; -spin_lock_irqsave (&gart->pte_lock, flags); +spin_lock (&gart->pte_lock); pte =gart_read_pte (gart, iova); -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags); +spin_unlock (&gart->pte_lock); - pa = (pte &GART_PAGE_MASK ); -if (!pfn_valid (__phys_to_pfn (pa))) { -dev_err (gart->dev,"GART: No entry for %08llx:%pa\n" , - (unsigned long long )iova, &pa); -gart_dump_table (gart); -return -EINVAL ; - } -return pa; +return pte &GART_PAGE_MASK ; }static bool gart_iommu_capable (enum iommu_cap cap)@@ -342,24 +306,19 @@ static const struct iommu_ops gart_iommu_ops = {int tegra_gart_suspend (struct gart_device *gart) { -unsigned long iova;u32 *data = gart->savedata; -unsigned long flags; +unsigned long iova;
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c static const struct iommu_ops gart_iommu_ops = { · line 352
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +0
-2-spin_lock_irqsave (&gart->pte_lock, flags);for_each_gart_pte (gart, iova) *(data++) =gart_read_pte (gart, iova); -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags);Why is it safe to remove the lock here?
Nothing shall access GART at this point, I can't imagine a legit scenario for that to happen. Hence it will be a bug and locking is not needed here since it won't be helpful anyway.
Quoted 50 lines
Quoted 38 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +5
-9+return 0 ; }int tegra_gart_resume (struct gart_device *gart) { -unsigned long flags; - -spin_lock_irqsave (&gart->pte_lock, flags);do_gart_setup (gart, gart->savedata); -spin_unlock_irqrestore (&gart->pte_lock, flags); +return 0 ; }@@ -368,8 +327,7 @@ struct gart_device *tegra_gart_probe(struct device *dev, struct tegra_mc *mc) {struct gart_device *gart; -struct resource *res_remap; -void __iomem *gart_regs; +struct resource *res;int ret;BUILD_BUG_ON (PAGE_SHIFT !=GART_PAGE_SHIFT );@@ -379,9 +337,8 @@ struct gart_device *tegra_gart_probe(struct device *dev,return NULL ;/* the GART memory aperture is required */ - res_remap =platform_get_resource (to_platform_device (dev), -IORESOURCE_MEM ,1 ); -if (!res_remap) { + res =platform_get_resource (to_platform_device (dev),IORESOURCE_MEM ,1 ); +if (!res) {dev_err (dev,"GART: Memory aperture resource unavailable\n" );return ERR_PTR (-ENXIO ); }drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c struct gart_device *tegra_gart_probe(struct device *dev, · line 355
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/iommu/tegra-gart.c +6
-0@@ -390,39 +347,35 @@ struct gart_device *tegra_gart_probe(struct device *dev,if (!gart)return ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); + gart_handle = gart; + + gart->dev = dev; + gart->regs = mc->regs +GART_REG_BASE ; + gart->iovmm_base = res->start; + gart->iovmm_end = res->start +resource_size (res);Why not simply:
Quoted 3 lines
gart->iovmm_end = res->end;?
It could be set that way too, thanks. Only need to take into account that res->end is off by one, hence it should be:
gart->iovmm_end = res->end + 1;