xfs-4.20: scrub fixes
v4 cover xfs-4.20: scrub fixes
Hi all,
Here are a few online fsck fixes for 4.20.
The first patch fixes the online repair "find AG btree root" function to ignore btree blocks that have siblings and to ignore a btree level if multiple sibling-less blocks are found.
The second patch strengthens the buffer read functions to apply buffer ops (and verify the buffer contents) any time a caller tries to read a buffer with a given set of ops and the buffer doesn't have ops yet.
The third patch fixes some buffer state management bugs so that we don't accidentally clobber b_ops on buffers that were already in-core when we try to find an AG header's btree root blocks.
Comments and questions are, as always, welcome.
--D
PATCH v4 1/3 xfs: xrep_findroot_block should reject root blocks with siblings
From: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
In xrep_findroot_block, if we find a candidate root block with sibling pointers or sibling blocks on the same tree level, we should not return that block as a tree root because root blocks cannot have siblings.
--- fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c +48 -13
@@ -692,12 +692,13 @@ xrep_findroot_block(struct xrep_find_ag_btree *fab, uint64_t owner, xfs_agblock_t agbno, - bool *found_it) + bool *done_with_block) { struct xfs_mount *mp = ri->sc->mp;struct xfs_buf *bp;struct xfs_btree_block *btblock;xfs_daddr_t daddr; +int block_level;int error; daddr =XFS_AGB_TO_DADDR (mp, ri->sc->sa.agno, agbno);
@@ -735,18 +736,52 @@ xrep_findroot_block( goto out; bp->b_ops = fab->buf_ops; -/* Ignore this block if it's lower in the tree than we've seen. */ -if (fab->root !=NULLAGBLOCK && -xfs_btree_get_level (btblock) < fab->height) - goto out; -/* Make sure we pass the verifiers. */ bp->b_ops->verify_read (bp);if (bp->b_error) goto out; - fab->root = agbno; - fab->height =xfs_btree_get_level (btblock) +1 ; - *found_it = true; + +/* +* This block passes the magic/uuid and verifier tests for this btree +* type. We don't need the caller to try the other tree types. +*/ + *done_with_block = true; + +/* +* Compare this btree block's level to the height of the current +* candidate root block. +* +* If the level matches the root we found previously, throw away both +* blocks because there can't be two candidate roots. +* +* If level is lower in the tree than the root we found previously, +* ignore this block. +*/ + block_level =xfs_btree_get_level (btblock); +if (block_level +1 == fab->height) { + fab->root =NULLAGBLOCK ; + goto out; + }else if (block_level < fab->height) { + goto out; + } + +/* +* This is the highest block in the tree that we've found so far. +* Update the btree height to reflect what we've learned from this +* block. +*/ + fab->height = block_level +1 ; + +/* +* If this block doesn't have sibling pointers, then it's the new root +* block candidate. Otherwise, the root will be found farther up the +* tree. +*/ +if (btblock->bb_u.s.bb_leftsib ==cpu_to_be32 (NULLAGBLOCK ) && + btblock->bb_u.s.bb_rightsib ==cpu_to_be32 (NULLAGBLOCK )) + fab->root = agbno; +else + fab->root =NULLAGBLOCK ;trace_xrep_findroot_block (mp, ri->sc->sa.agno, agbno,be32_to_cpu (btblock->bb_magic), fab->height -1 );
@@ -768,7 +803,7 @@ xrep_findroot_rmap(struct xrep_findroot *ri = priv;struct xrep_find_ag_btree *fab;xfs_agblock_t b; -bool found_it; +bool done;int error =0 ;/* Ignore anything that isn't AG metadata. */
@@ -777,16 +812,16 @@ xrep_findroot_rmap(/* Otherwise scan each block + btree type. */ for (b =0 ; b < rec->rm_blockcount; b++) { - found_it = false; + done = false;for (fab = ri->btree_info; fab->buf_ops; fab++) {if (rec->rm_owner != fab->rmap_owner)continue ; error =xrep_findroot_block (ri, fab, rec->rm_owner, rec->rm_startblock + b, - &found_it); + &done);if (error)return error; -if (found_it) +if (done)break ; } }
PATCH v4 2/3 xfs: always assign buffer verifiers when one is provided
In reply to Darrick J. WongFrom: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
If a caller supplies buffer ops when trying to read a buffer and the buffer doesn't already have buf ops assigned, ensure that the ops are assigned to the buffer and the verifier is run on that buffer.
Note that current XFS code is careful to assign buffer ops after a xfs_{trans_,}buf_read call in which ops were not supplied. However, we should apply ops defensively in case there is ever a coding mistake; and an upcoming repair patch will need to be able to read a buffer without assigning buf ops.
--- fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h | 2 ++ fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c +47 -17
@@ -749,6 +749,30 @@ _xfs_buf_read(return xfs_buf_submit (bp); } +/* +* If the caller passed in an ops structure and the buffer doesn't have ops +* assigned, set the ops and use them to verify the contents. If the contents +* cannot be verified, we'll clear XBF_DONE. We assume the buffer has no +* recorded errors and is already in XBF_DONE state. +*/ +int +xfs_buf_ensure_ops ( +struct xfs_buf *bp, +const struct xfs_buf_ops *ops) +{ +ASSERT (bp->b_flags &XBF_DONE ); +ASSERT (bp->b_error ==0 ); + +if (!ops || bp->b_ops) +return 0 ; + + bp->b_ops = ops; + bp->b_ops->verify_read (bp); +if (bp->b_error) + bp->b_flags &= ~XBF_DONE ; +return bp->b_error; +} +xfs_buf_t * xfs_buf_read_map( struct xfs_buftarg *target,
@@ -762,26 +786,32 @@ xfs_buf_read_map( flags |=XBF_READ ; bp =xfs_buf_get_map (target, map, nmaps, flags); -if (bp) { -trace_xfs_buf_read (bp, flags, _RET_IP_); +if (!bp) +return NULL ; -if (!(bp->b_flags &XBF_DONE )) { -XFS_STATS_INC (target->bt_mount, xb_get_read); - bp->b_ops = ops; -_xfs_buf_read (bp, flags); - }else if (flags &XBF_ASYNC ) { -/* -* Read ahead call which is already satisfied, -* drop the buffer -*/ -xfs_buf_relse (bp); -return NULL ; - }else { -/* We do not want read in the flags */ - bp->b_flags &= ~XBF_READ ; - } +trace_xfs_buf_read (bp, flags, _RET_IP_); + +if (!(bp->b_flags &XBF_DONE )) { +XFS_STATS_INC (target->bt_mount, xb_get_read); + bp->b_ops = ops; +_xfs_buf_read (bp, flags); +return bp; + } + +xfs_buf_ensure_ops (bp, ops); + +if (flags &XBF_ASYNC ) { +/* +* Read ahead call which is already satisfied, +* drop the buffer +*/ +xfs_buf_relse (bp); +return NULL ; } +/* We do not want read in the flags */ + bp->b_flags &= ~XBF_READ ; +ASSERT (bp->b_ops !=NULL || ops ==NULL );return bp; }
fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h +2 -0
@@ -385,4 +385,6 @@ extern int xfs_setsize_buftarg(xfs_buftarg_t *, unsigned int);#define xfs_getsize_buftarg (buftarg) block_size((buftarg)->bt_bdev)#define xfs_readonly_buftarg (buftarg) bdev_read_only((buftarg)->bt_bdev) +int xfs_buf_ensure_ops (struct xfs_buf *bp,const struct xfs_buf_ops *ops); +#endif /* __XFS_BUF_H__ */
fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c +29 -0
@@ -264,11 +264,39 @@ xfs_trans_read_buf_map(return -EIO ; } +/* +* Check if the caller is trying to read a buffer that is +* already attached to the transaction yet has no buffer ops +* assigned. Ops are usually attached when the buffer is +* attached to the transaction, or by the read caller if +* special circumstances. That didn't happen, which is not +* how this is supposed to go. +* +* If the buffer passes verification we'll let this go, but if +* not we have to shut down. Let the transaction cleanup code +* release this buffer when it kills the tranaction. +*/ +ASSERT (bp->b_ops !=NULL ); + error =xfs_buf_ensure_ops (bp, ops); +if (error) { +xfs_buf_ioerror_alert (bp, __func__); + +if (tp->t_flags &XFS_TRANS_DIRTY ) +xfs_force_shutdown (tp->t_mountp, +SHUTDOWN_META_IO_ERROR ); + +/* bad CRC means corrupted metadata */ +if (error == -EFSBADCRC ) + error = -EFSCORRUPTED ; +return error; + } + bip = bp->b_log_item; bip->bli_recur++;ASSERT (atomic_read (&bip->bli_refcount) >0 );trace_xfs_trans_read_buf_recur (bip); +ASSERT (bp->b_ops !=NULL || ops ==NULL ); *bpp = bp;return 0 ; }
@@ -316,6 +344,7 @@ xfs_trans_read_buf_map(_xfs_trans_bjoin (tp, bp,1 );trace_xfs_trans_read_buf (bp->b_log_item); } +ASSERT (bp->b_ops !=NULL || ops ==NULL ); *bpp = bp;return 0 ;
PATCH v4 3/3 xfs: fix buffer state management in xrep_findroot_block
In reply to Darrick J. WongFrom: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
We don't handle buffer state properly in online repair's findroot routine. If a buffer already has b_ops set, we don't ever want to touch that, and we don't want to call the read verifiers on a buffer that could be dirty (CRCs are only recomputed during log checkpoints).
Therefore, be more careful about what we do with a buffer -- if someone else already attached ops that are not the ones for this btree type, just ignore the buffer. We only attach our btree type's buf ops if it matches the magic/uuid and structure checks.
We also modify xfs_buf_read_map to allow callers to set buffer ops on a DONE buffer with NULL ops so that repair doesn't leave behind buffers which won't have buffers attached to them.
--- fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h | 1 + fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c | 13 ++++++++++ 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c +51 -14
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@#include "xfs_ag_resv.h" #include "xfs_trans_space.h" #include "xfs_quota.h" +#include "xfs_attr.h" +#include "xfs_reflink.h" #include "scrub/xfs_scrub.h" #include "scrub/scrub.h" #include "scrub/common.h"
@@ -699,7 +701,7 @@ xrep_findroot_block(struct xfs_btree_block *btblock;xfs_daddr_t daddr;int block_level; -int error; +int error =0 ; daddr =XFS_AGB_TO_DADDR (mp, ri->sc->sa.agno, agbno);
@@ -718,28 +720,63 @@ xrep_findroot_block(return error; } +/* +* Read the buffer into memory so that we can see if it's a match for +* our btree type. We have no clue if it is beforehand, and we want to +* avoid xfs_trans_read_buf's behavior of dumping the DONE state (which +* will cause needless disk reads in subsequent calls to this function) +* and logging metadata verifier failures. +* +* Therefore, pass in NULL buffer ops. If the buffer was already in +* memory from some other caller it will already have b_ops assigned. +* If it was in memory from a previous unsuccessful findroot_block +* call, the buffer won't have b_ops but it should be clean and ready +* for us to try to verify if the read call succeeds. The same applies +* if the buffer wasn't in memory at all. +* +* Note: If we never match a btree type with this buffer, it will be +* left in memory with NULL b_ops. This shouldn't be a problem unless +* the buffer gets written. +*/ error =xfs_trans_read_buf (mp, ri->sc->tp, mp->m_ddev_targp, daddr, mp->m_bsize,0 , &bp,NULL );if (error)return error; -/* -* Does this look like a block matching our fs and higher than any -* other block we've found so far? If so, reattach buffer verifiers -* so the AIL won't complain if the buffer is also dirty. -*/ +/* Ensure the block magic matches the btree type we're looking for. */ btblock =XFS_BUF_TO_BLOCK (bp);if (be32_to_cpu (btblock->bb_magic) != fab->magic) goto out; -if (xfs_sb_version_hascrc (&mp->m_sb) && - !uuid_equal (&btblock->bb_u.s.bb_uuid, &mp->m_sb.sb_meta_uuid)) - goto out; - bp->b_ops = fab->buf_ops; -/* Make sure we pass the verifiers. */ - bp->b_ops->verify_read (bp); -if (bp->b_error) - goto out; +/* +* If the buffer already has ops applied and they're not the ones for +* this btree type, we know this block doesn't match the btree and we +* can bail out. +* +* If the buffer ops match ours, someone else has already validated +* the block for us, so we can move on to checking if this is a root +* block candidate. +* +* If the buffer does not have ops, nobody has successfully validated +* the contents and the buffer cannot be dirty. If the magic, uuid, +* and structure match this btree type then we'll move on to checking +* if it's a root block candidate. If there is no match, bail out. +*/ +if (bp->b_ops) { +if (bp->b_ops != fab->buf_ops) + goto out; + }else { +ASSERT (!xfs_trans_buf_is_dirty (bp)); +if (!uuid_equal (&btblock->bb_u.s.bb_uuid, + &mp->m_sb.sb_meta_uuid)) + goto out; + fab->buf_ops->verify_read (bp); +if (bp->b_error) { + bp->b_error =0 ; + goto out; + } + bp->b_ops = fab->buf_ops; + }/* * This block passes the magic/uuid and verifier tests for this btree
fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h +1 -0
@@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ void xfs_trans_ijoin(struct xfs_trans *, struct xfs_inode *, uint);void xfs_trans_log_buf (struct xfs_trans *,struct xfs_buf *,uint ,uint );void xfs_trans_dirty_buf (struct xfs_trans *,struct xfs_buf *); +bool xfs_trans_buf_is_dirty (struct xfs_buf *bp);void xfs_trans_log_inode (xfs_trans_t *,struct xfs_inode *,uint );void xfs_extent_free_init_defer_op (void );
fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c +13 -0
@@ -350,6 +350,19 @@ xfs_trans_read_buf_map( } +/* Has this buffer been dirtied by anyone? */ +bool +xfs_trans_buf_is_dirty ( +struct xfs_buf *bp) +{ +struct xfs_buf_log_item *bip = bp->b_log_item; + +if (!bip) +return false; +ASSERT (bip->bli_item.li_type ==XFS_LI_BUF ); +return test_bit (XFS_LI_DIRTY , &bip->bli_item.li_flags); +} +/* * Release a buffer previously joined to the transaction. If the buffer is * modified within this transaction, decrement the recursion count but do not
Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: fix buffer state management in xrep_findroot_block
Quoted 109 lines · Darrick J. Wong
From: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
We don't handle buffer state properly in online repair's findroot routine. If a buffer already has
b_opsset, we don't ever want to touch that, and we don't want to call the read verifiers on a buffer that could be dirty (CRCs are only recomputed during log checkpoints).Therefore, be more careful about what we do with a buffer -- if someone else already attached ops that are not the ones for this btree type, just ignore the buffer. We only attach our btree type's buf ops if it matches the magic/uuid and structure checks.
We also modify
xfs_buf_read_mapto allow callers to set buffer ops on a DONE buffer with NULL ops so that repair doesn't leave behind buffers which won't have buffers attached to them.Signed-off-by Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>--- fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h | 1 + fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c | 13 ++++++++++ 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c +40
-14@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@#include "xfs_ag_resv.h" #include "xfs_trans_space.h" #include "xfs_quota.h" +#include "xfs_attr.h" +#include "xfs_reflink.h" #include "scrub/xfs_scrub.h" #include "scrub/scrub.h" #include "scrub/common.h" @@ -699,7 +701,7 @@ xrep_findroot_block(struct xfs_btree_block *btblock;xfs_daddr_t daddr;int block_level; -int error; +int error =0 ; daddr =XFS_AGB_TO_DADDR (mp, ri->sc->sa.agno, agbno);@@ -718,28 +720,63 @@ xrep_findroot_block(return error; } +/* +* Read the buffer into memory so that we can see if it's a match for +* our btree type. We have no clue if it is beforehand, and we want to +* avoid xfs_trans_read_buf's behavior of dumping the DONE state (which +* will cause needless disk reads in subsequent calls to this function) +* and logging metadata verifier failures. +* +* Therefore, pass in NULL buffer ops. If the buffer was already in +* memory from some other caller it will already have b_ops assigned. +* If it was in memory from a previous unsuccessful findroot_block +* call, the buffer won't have b_ops but it should be clean and ready +* for us to try to verify if the read call succeeds. The same applies +* if the buffer wasn't in memory at all. +* +* Note: If we never match a btree type with this buffer, it will be +* left in memory with NULL b_ops. This shouldn't be a problem unless +* the buffer gets written. +*/ error =xfs_trans_read_buf (mp, ri->sc->tp, mp->m_ddev_targp, daddr, mp->m_bsize,0 , &bp,NULL );if (error)return error; -/* -* Does this look like a block matching our fs and higher than any -* other block we've found so far? If so, reattach buffer verifiers -* so the AIL won't complain if the buffer is also dirty. -*/ +/* Ensure the block magic matches the btree type we're looking for. */ btblock =XFS_BUF_TO_BLOCK (bp);if (be32_to_cpu (btblock->bb_magic) != fab->magic) goto out; -if (xfs_sb_version_hascrc (&mp->m_sb) && - !uuid_equal (&btblock->bb_u.s.bb_uuid, &mp->m_sb.sb_meta_uuid)) - goto out; - bp->b_ops = fab->buf_ops; -/* Make sure we pass the verifiers. */ - bp->b_ops->verify_read (bp); -if (bp->b_error) - goto out; +/* +* If the buffer already has ops applied and they're not the ones for +* this btree type, we know this block doesn't match the btree and we +* can bail out. +* +* If the buffer ops match ours, someone else has already validated +* the block for us, so we can move on to checking if this is a root +* block candidate. +* +* If the buffer does not have ops, nobody has successfully validated +* the contents and the buffer cannot be dirty. If the magic, uuid, +* and structure match this btree type then we'll move on to checking +* if it's a root block candidate. If there is no match, bail out. +*/ +if (bp->b_ops) { +if (bp->b_ops != fab->buf_ops) + goto out; + }else {
fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c xrep_findroot_block( · line 778
Quoted 10 lines
fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c +10
-0+ASSERT (!xfs_trans_buf_is_dirty (bp)); +if (!uuid_equal (&btblock->bb_u.s.bb_uuid, + &mp->m_sb.sb_meta_uuid)) + goto out; + fab->buf_ops->verify_read (bp); +if (bp->b_error) { + bp->b_error =0 ; + goto out; + } + bp->b_ops = fab->buf_ops;
In light of the assert issues you hit on the previous patch related to verifiers reassigning ->b_ops, perhaps we should think about clearing ->b_ops on error and making the line above something like:
if (!bp->b_ops) bp->b_ops = fab->buf_ops;
I guess this mechanism is only for per-ag btrees atm, but that could be a fun landmine to deal with if this rmap searching/detecting code is ever repurposed to deal with directories/attrs or other verifiers are updated to do a similar kind of reassignment. Not an immediate issue (and I don't want to nit this patch to death :P), so:
Quoted 41 lines
fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c +1
-0+ }/* * This block passes the magic/uuid and verifier tests for this btree fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h +1
-0@@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ void xfs_trans_ijoin(struct xfs_trans *, struct xfs_inode *, uint);void xfs_trans_log_buf (struct xfs_trans *,struct xfs_buf *,uint ,uint );void xfs_trans_dirty_buf (struct xfs_trans *,struct xfs_buf *); +bool xfs_trans_buf_is_dirty (struct xfs_buf *bp);void xfs_trans_log_inode (xfs_trans_t *,struct xfs_inode *,uint );void xfs_extent_free_init_defer_op (void );fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c +13
-0@@ -350,6 +350,19 @@ xfs_trans_read_buf_map( } +/* Has this buffer been dirtied by anyone? */ +bool +xfs_trans_buf_is_dirty ( +struct xfs_buf *bp) +{ +struct xfs_buf_log_item *bip = bp->b_log_item; + +if (!bip) +return false; +ASSERT (bip->bli_item.li_type ==XFS_LI_BUF ); +return test_bit (XFS_LI_DIRTY , &bip->bli_item.li_flags); +} +/* * Release a buffer previously joined to the transaction. If the buffer is * modified within this transaction, decrement the recursion count but do not
Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: fix buffer state management in xrep_findroot_block
Quoted 125 lines · Brian Foster
Quoted 109 lines · Darrick J. Wong
From: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
We don't handle buffer state properly in online repair's findroot routine. If a buffer already has
b_opsset, we don't ever want to touch that, and we don't want to call the read verifiers on a buffer that could be dirty (CRCs are only recomputed during log checkpoints).Therefore, be more careful about what we do with a buffer -- if someone else already attached ops that are not the ones for this btree type, just ignore the buffer. We only attach our btree type's buf ops if it matches the magic/uuid and structure checks.
We also modify
xfs_buf_read_mapto allow callers to set buffer ops on a DONE buffer with NULL ops so that repair doesn't leave behind buffers which won't have buffers attached to them.Signed-off-by Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>--- fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h | 1 + fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c | 13 ++++++++++ 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c +40
-14@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@#include "xfs_ag_resv.h" #include "xfs_trans_space.h" #include "xfs_quota.h" +#include "xfs_attr.h" +#include "xfs_reflink.h" #include "scrub/xfs_scrub.h" #include "scrub/scrub.h" #include "scrub/common.h" @@ -699,7 +701,7 @@ xrep_findroot_block(struct xfs_btree_block *btblock;xfs_daddr_t daddr;int block_level; -int error; +int error =0 ; daddr =XFS_AGB_TO_DADDR (mp, ri->sc->sa.agno, agbno);@@ -718,28 +720,63 @@ xrep_findroot_block(return error; } +/* +* Read the buffer into memory so that we can see if it's a match for +* our btree type. We have no clue if it is beforehand, and we want to +* avoid xfs_trans_read_buf's behavior of dumping the DONE state (which +* will cause needless disk reads in subsequent calls to this function) +* and logging metadata verifier failures. +* +* Therefore, pass in NULL buffer ops. If the buffer was already in +* memory from some other caller it will already have b_ops assigned. +* If it was in memory from a previous unsuccessful findroot_block +* call, the buffer won't have b_ops but it should be clean and ready +* for us to try to verify if the read call succeeds. The same applies +* if the buffer wasn't in memory at all. +* +* Note: If we never match a btree type with this buffer, it will be +* left in memory with NULL b_ops. This shouldn't be a problem unless +* the buffer gets written. +*/ error =xfs_trans_read_buf (mp, ri->sc->tp, mp->m_ddev_targp, daddr, mp->m_bsize,0 , &bp,NULL );if (error)return error; -/* -* Does this look like a block matching our fs and higher than any -* other block we've found so far? If so, reattach buffer verifiers -* so the AIL won't complain if the buffer is also dirty. -*/ +/* Ensure the block magic matches the btree type we're looking for. */ btblock =XFS_BUF_TO_BLOCK (bp);if (be32_to_cpu (btblock->bb_magic) != fab->magic) goto out; -if (xfs_sb_version_hascrc (&mp->m_sb) && - !uuid_equal (&btblock->bb_u.s.bb_uuid, &mp->m_sb.sb_meta_uuid)) - goto out; - bp->b_ops = fab->buf_ops; -/* Make sure we pass the verifiers. */ - bp->b_ops->verify_read (bp); -if (bp->b_error) - goto out; +/* +* If the buffer already has ops applied and they're not the ones for +* this btree type, we know this block doesn't match the btree and we +* can bail out. +* +* If the buffer ops match ours, someone else has already validated +* the block for us, so we can move on to checking if this is a root +* block candidate. +* +* If the buffer does not have ops, nobody has successfully validated +* the contents and the buffer cannot be dirty. If the magic, uuid, +* and structure match this btree type then we'll move on to checking +* if it's a root block candidate. If there is no match, bail out. +*/ +if (bp->b_ops) { +if (bp->b_ops != fab->buf_ops) + goto out; + }else {fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c xrep_findroot_block( · line 778
Quoted 10 lines
fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c +10
-0+ASSERT (!xfs_trans_buf_is_dirty (bp)); +if (!uuid_equal (&btblock->bb_u.s.bb_uuid, + &mp->m_sb.sb_meta_uuid)) + goto out; + fab->buf_ops->verify_read (bp); +if (bp->b_error) { + bp->b_error =0 ; + goto out; + } + bp->b_ops = fab->buf_ops;In light of the assert issues you hit on the previous patch related to verifiers reassigning ->b_ops, perhaps we should think about clearing ->b_ops on error and making the line above something like:
Quoted 8 lines
if (!bp->b_ops) bp->b_ops = fab->buf_ops;I guess this mechanism is only for per-ag btrees atm, but that could be a fun landmine to deal with if this rmap searching/detecting code is ever repurposed to deal with directories/attrs or other verifiers are updated to do a similar kind of reassignment. Not an immediate issue (and I don't want to nit this patch to death :P), so:
This function was only ever meant to find AG btree roots (and the dir/attr code uses a different strategy to recover its marbles), but there's still time to revise the patch to avoid that landmine, so I'll go ahead and add that in:
/* * Some read verifiers will (re)set b_ops, so we must be * careful not to blow away any such assignment. */ if (!bp->b_ops) bp->b_ops = fab->buf_ops;
Thanks for the review!
--D
Quoted 43 lines
Reviewed-by Brian Foster <[email protected]>Quoted 41 lines
fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c +1
-0+ }/* * This block passes the magic/uuid and verifier tests for this btree fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h +1
-0@@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ void xfs_trans_ijoin(struct xfs_trans *, struct xfs_inode *, uint);void xfs_trans_log_buf (struct xfs_trans *,struct xfs_buf *,uint ,uint );void xfs_trans_dirty_buf (struct xfs_trans *,struct xfs_buf *); +bool xfs_trans_buf_is_dirty (struct xfs_buf *bp);void xfs_trans_log_inode (xfs_trans_t *,struct xfs_inode *,uint );void xfs_extent_free_init_defer_op (void );fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c +13
-0@@ -350,6 +350,19 @@ xfs_trans_read_buf_map( } +/* Has this buffer been dirtied by anyone? */ +bool +xfs_trans_buf_is_dirty ( +struct xfs_buf *bp) +{ +struct xfs_buf_log_item *bip = bp->b_log_item; + +if (!bip) +return false; +ASSERT (bip->bli_item.li_type ==XFS_LI_BUF ); +return test_bit (XFS_LI_DIRTY , &bip->bli_item.li_flags); +} +/* * Release a buffer previously joined to the transaction. If the buffer is * modified within this transaction, decrement the recursion count but do not
PATCH v2 3/3 xfs: fix buffer state management in xrep_findroot_block
In reply to Darrick J. WongFrom: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
We don't handle buffer state properly in online repair's findroot routine. If a buffer already has b_ops set, we don't ever want to touch that, and we don't want to call the read verifiers on a buffer that could be dirty (CRCs are only recomputed during log checkpoints).
Therefore, be more careful about what we do with a buffer -- if someone else already attached ops that are not the ones for this btree type, just ignore the buffer. We only attach our btree type's buf ops if it matches the magic/uuid and structure checks.
We also modify xfs_buf_read_map to allow callers to set buffer ops on a DONE buffer with NULL ops so that repair doesn't leave behind buffers which won't have buffers attached to them.
--- fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h | 1 + fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c | 13 +++++++++ 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c +57 -14
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@#include "xfs_ag_resv.h" #include "xfs_trans_space.h" #include "xfs_quota.h" +#include "xfs_attr.h" +#include "xfs_reflink.h" #include "scrub/xfs_scrub.h" #include "scrub/scrub.h" #include "scrub/common.h"
@@ -699,7 +701,7 @@ xrep_findroot_block(struct xfs_btree_block *btblock;xfs_daddr_t daddr;int block_level; -int error; +int error =0 ; daddr =XFS_AGB_TO_DADDR (mp, ri->sc->sa.agno, agbno);
@@ -718,28 +720,69 @@ xrep_findroot_block(return error; } +/* +* Read the buffer into memory so that we can see if it's a match for +* our btree type. We have no clue if it is beforehand, and we want to +* avoid xfs_trans_read_buf's behavior of dumping the DONE state (which +* will cause needless disk reads in subsequent calls to this function) +* and logging metadata verifier failures. +* +* Therefore, pass in NULL buffer ops. If the buffer was already in +* memory from some other caller it will already have b_ops assigned. +* If it was in memory from a previous unsuccessful findroot_block +* call, the buffer won't have b_ops but it should be clean and ready +* for us to try to verify if the read call succeeds. The same applies +* if the buffer wasn't in memory at all. +* +* Note: If we never match a btree type with this buffer, it will be +* left in memory with NULL b_ops. This shouldn't be a problem unless +* the buffer gets written. +*/ error =xfs_trans_read_buf (mp, ri->sc->tp, mp->m_ddev_targp, daddr, mp->m_bsize,0 , &bp,NULL );if (error)return error; -/* -* Does this look like a block matching our fs and higher than any -* other block we've found so far? If so, reattach buffer verifiers -* so the AIL won't complain if the buffer is also dirty. -*/ +/* Ensure the block magic matches the btree type we're looking for. */ btblock =XFS_BUF_TO_BLOCK (bp);if (be32_to_cpu (btblock->bb_magic) != fab->magic) goto out; -if (xfs_sb_version_hascrc (&mp->m_sb) && - !uuid_equal (&btblock->bb_u.s.bb_uuid, &mp->m_sb.sb_meta_uuid)) - goto out; - bp->b_ops = fab->buf_ops; -/* Make sure we pass the verifiers. */ - bp->b_ops->verify_read (bp); -if (bp->b_error) - goto out; +/* +* If the buffer already has ops applied and they're not the ones for +* this btree type, we know this block doesn't match the btree and we +* can bail out. +* +* If the buffer ops match ours, someone else has already validated +* the block for us, so we can move on to checking if this is a root +* block candidate. +* +* If the buffer does not have ops, nobody has successfully validated +* the contents and the buffer cannot be dirty. If the magic, uuid, +* and structure match this btree type then we'll move on to checking +* if it's a root block candidate. If there is no match, bail out. +*/ +if (bp->b_ops) { +if (bp->b_ops != fab->buf_ops) + goto out; + }else { +ASSERT (!xfs_trans_buf_is_dirty (bp)); +if (!uuid_equal (&btblock->bb_u.s.bb_uuid, + &mp->m_sb.sb_meta_uuid)) + goto out; + fab->buf_ops->verify_read (bp); +if (bp->b_error) { + bp->b_error =0 ; + goto out; + } + +/* +* Some read verifiers will (re)set b_ops, so we must be +* careful not to blow away any such assignment. +*/ +if (!bp->b_ops) + bp->b_ops = fab->buf_ops; + }/* * This block passes the magic/uuid and verifier tests for this btree
fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h +1 -0
@@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ void xfs_trans_ijoin(struct xfs_trans *, struct xfs_inode *, uint);void xfs_trans_log_buf (struct xfs_trans *,struct xfs_buf *,uint ,uint );void xfs_trans_dirty_buf (struct xfs_trans *,struct xfs_buf *); +bool xfs_trans_buf_is_dirty (struct xfs_buf *bp);void xfs_trans_log_inode (xfs_trans_t *,struct xfs_inode *,uint );void xfs_extent_free_init_defer_op (void );
fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c +13 -0
@@ -350,6 +350,19 @@ xfs_trans_read_buf_map( } +/* Has this buffer been dirtied by anyone? */ +bool +xfs_trans_buf_is_dirty ( +struct xfs_buf *bp) +{ +struct xfs_buf_log_item *bip = bp->b_log_item; + +if (!bip) +return false; +ASSERT (bip->bli_item.li_type ==XFS_LI_BUF ); +return test_bit (XFS_LI_DIRTY , &bip->bli_item.li_flags); +} +/* * Release a buffer previously joined to the transaction. If the buffer is * modified within this transaction, decrement the recursion count but do not