glibc: fix build breakage
PATCH 1/1 glibc: fix build breakage
From: Yegor Yefremov <[email protected]>
On platforms with soft floating point glibc produces a compile time warning (maybe-uninitialized) that will be regarded as an error.
Add upstream patch fixing this issue.
--- ...soft-fp-ignore-maybe-uninitialized-w.patch | 88 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+) create mode 100644 package/glibc/glibc-2.28-18-g2339d6a55eb7a7e040ae888e906adc49eeb59eab/0001-sysdeps-ieee754-soft-fp-ignore-maybe-uninitialized-w.patch
package/glibc/glibc-2.28-18-g2339d6a55eb7a7e040ae888e906adc49eeb59eab/0001-sysdeps-ieee754-soft-fp-ignore-maybe-uninitialized-w.patch new file +88 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ +From 4a06ceea33ecc220bbfe264d8f1e74de2f04e90d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Martin Jansa <[email protected]> +Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 15:38:43 +0000 +Subject: [PATCH] sysdeps/ieee754/soft-fp: ignore maybe-uninitialized with -O + [BZ #19444] + +* with -O, -O1, -Os it fails with: + +In file included from ../soft-fp/soft-fp.h:318, + from ../sysdeps/ieee754/soft-fp/s_fdiv.c:28: +../sysdeps/ieee754/soft-fp/s_fdiv.c: In function '__fdiv': +../soft-fp/op-2.h:98:25: error: 'R_f1' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] + X##_f0 = (X##_f1 << (_FP_W_TYPE_SIZE - (N)) | X##_f0 >> (N) \ + ^~ +../sysdeps/ieee754/soft-fp/s_fdiv.c:38:14: note: 'R_f1' was declared here + FP_DECL_D (R); + ^ +../soft-fp/op-2.h:37:36: note: in definition of macro '_FP_FRAC_DECL_2' + _FP_W_TYPE X##_f0 _FP_ZERO_INIT, X##_f1 _FP_ZERO_INIT + ^ +../soft-fp/double.h:95:24: note: in expansion of macro '_FP_DECL' + # define FP_DECL_D(X) _FP_DECL (2, X) + ^~~~~~~~ +../sysdeps/ieee754/soft-fp/s_fdiv.c:38:3: note: in expansion of macro 'FP_DECL_D' + FP_DECL_D (R); + ^~~~~~~~~ +../soft-fp/op-2.h:101:17: error: 'R_f0' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] + : (X##_f0 << (_FP_W_TYPE_SIZE - (N))) != 0)); \ + ^~ +../sysdeps/ieee754/soft-fp/s_fdiv.c:38:14: note: 'R_f0' was declared here + FP_DECL_D (R); + ^ +../soft-fp/op-2.h:37:14: note: in definition of macro '_FP_FRAC_DECL_2' + _FP_W_TYPE X##_f0 _FP_ZERO_INIT, X##_f1 _FP_ZERO_INIT + ^ +../soft-fp/double.h:95:24: note: in expansion of macro '_FP_DECL' + # define FP_DECL_D(X) _FP_DECL (2, X) + ^~~~~~~~ +../sysdeps/ieee754/soft-fp/s_fdiv.c:38:3: note: in expansion of macro 'FP_DECL_D' + FP_DECL_D (R); + ^~~~~~~~~ + +Build tested with Yocto for ARM, AARCH64, X86, X86_64, PPC, MIPS, MIPS64 +with -O, -O1, -Os. +For AARCH64 it needs one more fix in locale for -Os. + + [BZ #19444] + * sysdeps/ieee754/soft-fp/s_fdiv.c: Include <libc-diag.h> and use + DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT, DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT and + DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT to disable -Wmaybe-uninitialized. + + +Signed-off-by: Yegor Yefremov <[email protected]> +--- + sysdeps/ieee754/soft-fp/s_fdiv.c | 12 ++++++++++++ + 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+) + +diff --git a/sysdeps/ieee754/soft-fp/s_fdiv.c b/sysdeps/ieee754/soft-fp/s_fdiv.c +index 341339f5ed..7a15cbeee6 100644 +--- a/sysdeps/ieee754/soft-fp/s_fdiv.c ++++ b/sysdeps/ieee754/soft-fp/s_fdiv.c +@@ -25,6 +25,16 @@ + #undef fdivl + + #include <math-narrow.h> ++#include <libc-diag.h> ++ ++/* R_f[01] are not set in cases where they are not used in packing, ++ but the compiler does not see that they are set in all cases where ++ they are used, resulting in warnings that they may be used ++ uninitialized. The location of the warning differs in different ++ versions of GCC, it may be where R is defined using a macro or it ++ may be where the macro is defined. This happens only with -O1. */ ++DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT; ++DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (8, "-Wmaybe-uninitialized"); + #include <soft-fp.h> + #include <single.h> + #include <double.h> +@@ -53,4 +63,6 @@ __fdiv (double x, double y) + CHECK_NARROW_DIV (ret, x, y); + return ret; + } ++DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; ++ + libm_alias_float_double (div) +-- +2.17.0 +
Signature · 1 line
2.17.0
PATCH 1/1 glibc: fix build breakage
Hello,
Quoted 5 lines · yegorslists at googlemail.com
From: Yegor Yefremov <[email protected]>
On platforms with soft floating point glibc produces a compile time warning (maybe-uninitialized) that will be regarded as an error.
Quoted 7 lines
Add upstream patch fixing this issue.
Signed-off-by Yegor Yefremov <[email protected]>--- ...soft-fp-ignore-maybe-uninitialized-w.patch | 88 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+) create mode 100644 package/glibc/glibc-2.28-18-g2339d6a55eb7a7e040ae888e906adc49eeb59eab/0001-sysdeps-ieee754-soft-fp-ignore-maybe-uninitialized-w.patch
I've applied, but after tweaking the commit title to make it a bit more specific. "fix build breakage" is indeed very fuzzy.
Thanks!
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
PATCH 1/1 glibc: fix build breakage
Quoted 11 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
Hello,
Quoted 7 lines · yegorslists at googlemail.com
From: Yegor Yefremov <[email protected]>
On platforms with soft floating point glibc produces a compile time warning (maybe-uninitialized) that will be regarded as an error.
Add upstream patch fixing this issue.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Signed-off-by Yegor Yefremov <[email protected]>--- ...soft-fp-ignore-maybe-uninitialized-w.patch | 88 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+) create mode 100644 package/glibc/glibc-2.28-18-g2339d6a55eb7a7e040ae888e906adc49eeb59eab/0001-sysdeps-ieee754-soft-fp-ignore-maybe-uninitialized-w.patchI've applied, but after tweaking the commit title to make it a bit more specific. "fix build breakage" is indeed very fuzzy.
You're right. Thanks.
What about the patch for gzip? Is it coming anytime soon?
Yegor