fanotify: introduce new event types FAN_OPEN_EXEC and FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERM
Subsystems (3)
v4 cover fanotify: introduce new event types FAN_OPEN_EXEC and FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERM
Currently, the fanotify API does not provide a means for user space applications to receive events when a file has been opened specifically for execution. New event types FAN_OPEN_EXEC and FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERM have been introduced in order to provide users this capability.
These event types, when either are explicitly requested by the user, will be returned within the event mask when a marked file object is being opened has __FMODE_EXEC set as one of the flags for open_flag.
Linux is used as an operating system in some products, with an environment that can be certified under the Common Criteria Operating System Protection Profile (OSPP). This is a formal threat model for a class of technology. It requires specific countermeasures to mitigate threats. It requires documentation to explain how a product implements these countermeasures. It requires proof via a test suite to demonstrate that the requirements are met, observed and checked by an independent qualified third party. The latest set of requirements for OSPP v4.2 can be found here:
https://www.niap-ccevs.org/Profile/Info.cfm?PPID=424&id=424
If you look on page 58, you will see the following requirement:
FPT_SRP_EXT.1 Software Restriction Policies FPT_SRP_EXT.1.1 administrator specified [selection:
file path,
file digital signature,
version,
hash,
[assignment: other characteristics]
]
This patch is to help aid in meeting this requirement.
I've also written the required updates for the man-pages project. You can find the necessary changes for these new event types within the following commit:
https://github.com/matthewbobrowski/man-pages/commit/d075dd8c8dfe19fccb9ea91f9550ea41b6e67334
Please note that all modifications here are based on the changes Amir has made around deprecating some of the previously exposed UAPI constants. The branch which my changes are based on can be found here:
https://github.com/amir73il/linux/tree/fanotify_api-v3
Lastly, thanks to both Amir and Jan for their help and feedback along the way, truly appreciated.
---
Matthew Bobrowski (3):
fanotify: introduce new event type FAN_OPEN_EXEC
fanotify: return only user requested event types in event mask
fanotify: introduce new event type FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERM
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++-------------- fs/notify/fsnotify.c | 2 +- include/linux/fanotify.h | 5 ++-- include/linux/fsnotify.h | 12 +++++--- include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h | 10 +++++-- include/uapi/linux/fanotify.h | 2 ++ 6 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.17.2
PATCH v4 1/3 fanotify: introduce new event type FAN_OPEN_EXEC
A new event type FAN_OPEN_EXEC has been defined so that users have the ability to receive events specifically when a file has been opened with the intent to be executed.
The FAN_OPEN_EXEC flag is set within the fsnotify_open() hook only if a file has the __FMODE_EXEC bit set within file->f_flags.
--- fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 3 ++- fs/notify/fsnotify.c | 2 +- include/linux/fanotify.h | 2 +- include/linux/fsnotify.h | 2 ++ include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h | 7 +++++-- include/uapi/linux/fanotify.h | 1 + 6 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c +2 -1
@@ -207,8 +207,9 @@ static int fanotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,BUILD_BUG_ON (FAN_OPEN_PERM !=FS_OPEN_PERM );BUILD_BUG_ON (FAN_ACCESS_PERM !=FS_ACCESS_PERM );BUILD_BUG_ON (FAN_ONDIR !=FS_ISDIR ); +BUILD_BUG_ON (FAN_OPEN_EXEC !=FS_OPEN_EXEC ); -BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FANOTIFY_EVENT_BITS ) !=10 ); +BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FANOTIFY_EVENT_BITS ) !=11 );if (!fanotify_should_send_event (iter_info, mask, data, data_type))return 0 ;
fs/notify/fsnotify.c +1 -1
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static __init int fsnotify_init(void) {int ret; -BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FSNOTIFY_BITS ) !=23 ); +BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FSNOTIFY_BITS ) !=24 ); ret =init_srcu_struct (&fsnotify_mark_srcu);if (ret)
include/linux/fanotify.h +1 -1
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@/* Events that user can request to be notified on */ #define FANOTIFY_EVENTS (FAN_ACCESS | FAN_MODIFY | \ - FAN_CLOSE | FAN_OPEN) + FAN_CLOSE | FAN_OPEN | FAN_OPEN_EXEC)/* Events that require a permission response from user */ #define FANOTIFY_PERM_EVENTS (FAN_OPEN_PERM | FAN_ACCESS_PERM)
include/linux/fsnotify.h +2 -0
@@ -215,6 +215,8 @@ static inline void fsnotify_open(struct file *file)if (S_ISDIR (inode->i_mode)) mask |=FS_ISDIR ; +if (file->f_flags & __FMODE_EXEC) + mask |=FS_OPEN_EXEC ;fsnotify_parent (path,NULL , mask);fsnotify (inode, mask, path,FSNOTIFY_EVENT_PATH ,NULL ,0 );
include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h +5 -2
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@#define FS_DELETE 0x00000200/* Subfile was deleted */ #define FS_DELETE_SELF 0x00000400/* Self was deleted */ #define FS_MOVE_SELF 0x00000800/* Self was moved */ +#define FS_OPEN_EXEC 0x00001000/* File was opened for exec */ #define FS_UNMOUNT 0x00002000/* inode on umount fs */ #define FS_Q_OVERFLOW 0x00004000/* Event queued overflowed */
@@ -62,7 +63,8 @@#define FS_EVENTS_POSS_ON_CHILD (FS_ACCESS | FS_MODIFY | FS_ATTRIB |\ FS_CLOSE_WRITE | FS_CLOSE_NOWRITE | FS_OPEN |\ FS_MOVED_FROM | FS_MOVED_TO | FS_CREATE |\ - FS_DELETE | FS_OPEN_PERM | FS_ACCESS_PERM) + FS_DELETE | FS_OPEN_PERM | FS_ACCESS_PERM |\ + FS_OPEN_EXEC)#define FS_MOVE (FS_MOVED_FROM | FS_MOVED_TO)
@@ -74,7 +76,8 @@ FS_MOVED_FROM | FS_MOVED_TO | FS_CREATE | \ FS_DELETE | FS_DELETE_SELF | FS_MOVE_SELF | \ FS_UNMOUNT | FS_Q_OVERFLOW | FS_IN_IGNORED | \ - FS_OPEN_PERM | FS_ACCESS_PERM | FS_DN_RENAME) + FS_OPEN_PERM | FS_ACCESS_PERM | FS_DN_RENAME |\ + FS_OPEN_EXEC)/* Extra flags that may be reported with event or control handling of events */ #define ALL_FSNOTIFY_FLAGS (FS_EXCL_UNLINK | FS_ISDIR | FS_IN_ONESHOT | \
include/uapi/linux/fanotify.h +1 -0
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@#define FAN_CLOSE_WRITE 0x00000008/* Writtable file closed */ #define FAN_CLOSE_NOWRITE 0x00000010/* Unwrittable file closed */ #define FAN_OPEN 0x00000020/* File was opened */ +#define FAN_OPEN_EXEC 0x00001000/* File was opened for exec */ #define FAN_Q_OVERFLOW 0x00004000/* Event queued overflowed */
Signature · 1 line
2.17.2
Jan Kara
maintainerRe: [PATCH v4 1/3] fanotify: introduce new event type FAN_OPEN_EXEC
Quoted 3 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
A new event type
FAN_OPEN_EXEChas been defined so that users have the ability to receive events specifically when a file has been opened with the intent to be executed.
Can we perhaps expand this a bit to clarify that this means execve(), execve_at(), and uselib() syscalls? Then the sentence below could just clarify that feature is implemented by fanotify_open() generating FAN_OPEN_EXEC event if __FMODE_EXEC is set within file->f_flags. Thanks!
Honza
Quoted 114 lines
The
FAN_OPEN_EXECflag is set within thefsnotify_open()hook only if a file has the__FMODE_EXECbit set withinfile->f_flags.Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>--- fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 3 ++- fs/notify/fsnotify.c | 2 +- include/linux/fanotify.h | 2 +- include/linux/fsnotify.h | 2 ++ include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h | 7 +++++-- include/uapi/linux/fanotify.h | 1 + 6 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c +2
-1@@ -207,8 +207,9 @@ static int fanotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,BUILD_BUG_ON (FAN_OPEN_PERM !=FS_OPEN_PERM );BUILD_BUG_ON (FAN_ACCESS_PERM !=FS_ACCESS_PERM );BUILD_BUG_ON (FAN_ONDIR !=FS_ISDIR ); +BUILD_BUG_ON (FAN_OPEN_EXEC !=FS_OPEN_EXEC ); -BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FANOTIFY_EVENT_BITS ) !=10 ); +BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FANOTIFY_EVENT_BITS ) !=11 );if (!fanotify_should_send_event (iter_info, mask, data, data_type))return 0 ;fs/notify/fsnotify.c +1
-1@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static __init int fsnotify_init(void) {int ret; -BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FSNOTIFY_BITS ) !=23 ); +BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FSNOTIFY_BITS ) !=24 ); ret =init_srcu_struct (&fsnotify_mark_srcu);if (ret)include/linux/fanotify.h +1
-1@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@/* Events that user can request to be notified on */ #define FANOTIFY_EVENTS (FAN_ACCESS | FAN_MODIFY | \ - FAN_CLOSE | FAN_OPEN) + FAN_CLOSE | FAN_OPEN | FAN_OPEN_EXEC)/* Events that require a permission response from user */ #define FANOTIFY_PERM_EVENTS (FAN_OPEN_PERM | FAN_ACCESS_PERM)include/linux/fsnotify.h +2
-0@@ -215,6 +215,8 @@ static inline void fsnotify_open(struct file *file)if (S_ISDIR (inode->i_mode)) mask |=FS_ISDIR ; +if (file->f_flags & __FMODE_EXEC) + mask |=FS_OPEN_EXEC ;fsnotify_parent (path,NULL , mask);fsnotify (inode, mask, path,FSNOTIFY_EVENT_PATH ,NULL ,0 );include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h +5
-2@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@#define FS_DELETE 0x00000200/* Subfile was deleted */ #define FS_DELETE_SELF 0x00000400/* Self was deleted */ #define FS_MOVE_SELF 0x00000800/* Self was moved */ +#define FS_OPEN_EXEC 0x00001000/* File was opened for exec */ #define FS_UNMOUNT 0x00002000/* inode on umount fs */ #define FS_Q_OVERFLOW 0x00004000/* Event queued overflowed */ @@ -62,7 +63,8 @@#define FS_EVENTS_POSS_ON_CHILD (FS_ACCESS | FS_MODIFY | FS_ATTRIB |\ FS_CLOSE_WRITE | FS_CLOSE_NOWRITE | FS_OPEN |\ FS_MOVED_FROM | FS_MOVED_TO | FS_CREATE |\ - FS_DELETE | FS_OPEN_PERM | FS_ACCESS_PERM) + FS_DELETE | FS_OPEN_PERM | FS_ACCESS_PERM |\ + FS_OPEN_EXEC)#define FS_MOVE (FS_MOVED_FROM | FS_MOVED_TO)@@ -74,7 +76,8 @@ FS_MOVED_FROM | FS_MOVED_TO | FS_CREATE | \ FS_DELETE | FS_DELETE_SELF | FS_MOVE_SELF | \ FS_UNMOUNT | FS_Q_OVERFLOW | FS_IN_IGNORED | \ - FS_OPEN_PERM | FS_ACCESS_PERM | FS_DN_RENAME) + FS_OPEN_PERM | FS_ACCESS_PERM | FS_DN_RENAME |\ + FS_OPEN_EXEC)/* Extra flags that may be reported with event or control handling of events */ #define ALL_FSNOTIFY_FLAGS (FS_EXCL_UNLINK | FS_ISDIR | FS_IN_ONESHOT | \include/uapi/linux/fanotify.h +1
-0@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@#define FAN_CLOSE_WRITE 0x00000008/* Writtable file closed */ #define FAN_CLOSE_NOWRITE 0x00000010/* Unwrittable file closed */ #define FAN_OPEN 0x00000020/* File was opened */ +#define FAN_OPEN_EXEC 0x00001000/* File was opened for exec */ #define FAN_Q_OVERFLOW 0x00004000/* Event queued overflowed */ Signature · 1 line
2.17.2
Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR
Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] fanotify: introduce new event type FAN_OPEN_EXEC
Quoted 9 lines · Jan Kara
Quoted 3 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
A new event type
FAN_OPEN_EXEChas been defined so that users have the ability to receive events specifically when a file has been opened with the intent to be executed.Can we perhaps expand this a bit to clarify that this means
execve(),execve_at(), anduselib()syscalls? Then the sentence below could just clarify that feature is implemented byfanotify_open()generatingFAN_OPEN_EXECevent if__FMODE_EXECis set withinfile->f_flags. Thanks!
Updated.
I will include these updates within the new patch series I'm going to post through.
Quoted 117 lines
Quoted 114 lines
The
FAN_OPEN_EXECflag is set within thefsnotify_open()hook only if a file has the__FMODE_EXECbit set withinfile->f_flags.Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>--- fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 3 ++- fs/notify/fsnotify.c | 2 +- include/linux/fanotify.h | 2 +- include/linux/fsnotify.h | 2 ++ include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h | 7 +++++-- include/uapi/linux/fanotify.h | 1 + 6 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c +2
-1@@ -207,8 +207,9 @@ static int fanotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,BUILD_BUG_ON (FAN_OPEN_PERM !=FS_OPEN_PERM );BUILD_BUG_ON (FAN_ACCESS_PERM !=FS_ACCESS_PERM );BUILD_BUG_ON (FAN_ONDIR !=FS_ISDIR ); +BUILD_BUG_ON (FAN_OPEN_EXEC !=FS_OPEN_EXEC ); -BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FANOTIFY_EVENT_BITS ) !=10 ); +BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FANOTIFY_EVENT_BITS ) !=11 );if (!fanotify_should_send_event (iter_info, mask, data, data_type))return 0 ;fs/notify/fsnotify.c +1
-1@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static __init int fsnotify_init(void) {int ret; -BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FSNOTIFY_BITS ) !=23 ); +BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FSNOTIFY_BITS ) !=24 ); ret =init_srcu_struct (&fsnotify_mark_srcu);if (ret)include/linux/fanotify.h +1
-1@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@/* Events that user can request to be notified on */ #define FANOTIFY_EVENTS (FAN_ACCESS | FAN_MODIFY | \ - FAN_CLOSE | FAN_OPEN) + FAN_CLOSE | FAN_OPEN | FAN_OPEN_EXEC)/* Events that require a permission response from user */ #define FANOTIFY_PERM_EVENTS (FAN_OPEN_PERM | FAN_ACCESS_PERM)include/linux/fsnotify.h +2
-0@@ -215,6 +215,8 @@ static inline void fsnotify_open(struct file *file)if (S_ISDIR (inode->i_mode)) mask |=FS_ISDIR ; +if (file->f_flags & __FMODE_EXEC) + mask |=FS_OPEN_EXEC ;fsnotify_parent (path,NULL , mask);fsnotify (inode, mask, path,FSNOTIFY_EVENT_PATH ,NULL ,0 );include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h +5
-2@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@#define FS_DELETE 0x00000200/* Subfile was deleted */ #define FS_DELETE_SELF 0x00000400/* Self was deleted */ #define FS_MOVE_SELF 0x00000800/* Self was moved */ +#define FS_OPEN_EXEC 0x00001000/* File was opened for exec */ #define FS_UNMOUNT 0x00002000/* inode on umount fs */ #define FS_Q_OVERFLOW 0x00004000/* Event queued overflowed */ @@ -62,7 +63,8 @@#define FS_EVENTS_POSS_ON_CHILD (FS_ACCESS | FS_MODIFY | FS_ATTRIB |\ FS_CLOSE_WRITE | FS_CLOSE_NOWRITE | FS_OPEN |\ FS_MOVED_FROM | FS_MOVED_TO | FS_CREATE |\ - FS_DELETE | FS_OPEN_PERM | FS_ACCESS_PERM) + FS_DELETE | FS_OPEN_PERM | FS_ACCESS_PERM |\ + FS_OPEN_EXEC)#define FS_MOVE (FS_MOVED_FROM | FS_MOVED_TO)@@ -74,7 +76,8 @@ FS_MOVED_FROM | FS_MOVED_TO | FS_CREATE | \ FS_DELETE | FS_DELETE_SELF | FS_MOVE_SELF | \ FS_UNMOUNT | FS_Q_OVERFLOW | FS_IN_IGNORED | \ - FS_OPEN_PERM | FS_ACCESS_PERM | FS_DN_RENAME) + FS_OPEN_PERM | FS_ACCESS_PERM | FS_DN_RENAME |\ + FS_OPEN_EXEC)/* Extra flags that may be reported with event or control handling of events */ #define ALL_FSNOTIFY_FLAGS (FS_EXCL_UNLINK | FS_ISDIR | FS_IN_ONESHOT | \include/uapi/linux/fanotify.h +1
-0@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@#define FAN_CLOSE_WRITE 0x00000008/* Writtable file closed */ #define FAN_CLOSE_NOWRITE 0x00000010/* Unwrittable file closed */ #define FAN_OPEN 0x00000020/* File was opened */ +#define FAN_OPEN_EXEC 0x00001000/* File was opened for exec */ #define FAN_Q_OVERFLOW 0x00004000/* Event queued overflowed */ Signature · 1 line
2.17.2Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR
PATCH v4 2/3 fanotify: return only user requested event types in event mask
In reply to Matthew BobrowskiModified fanotify_should_send_event() so that it now returns a mask for a event that contains ONLY flags for the event types that have been specifically requested by the user. Flags that may have been included within the event mask, but have not been explicitly requested by the user will not be present in the returned value.
As an example, given the situation where a user requests events of type FAN_OPEN. Traditionally, the event mask returned within an event that occurred on a filesystem object that has been marked for monitoring and is opened, will only ever have the FAN_OPEN bit set. With the introduction of the new flags like FAN_OPEN_EXEC, and perhaps any other future event flags, there is a possibility of the returned event mask containing more than a single bit set, despite having only requested the single event type. Prior to these modifications performed to fanotify_should_send_event(), a user would have received a bundled event mask containing flags FAN_OPEN and FAN_OPEN_EXEC in the instance that a file was opened for execution via execve(), for example. This means that a user would receive event types in the returned event mask that have not been requested. This runs the possibility of breaking existing systems and causing other unforeseen issues.
To mitigate this possibility, fanotify_should_send_event() has been modified to return the event mask containing ONLY event types explicitly requested by the user. This means that we will NOT report events that the user did no set a mask for, and we will NOT report events that the user has set an ignore mask for.
The function name fanotify_should_send_event() has also been updated so that it's more relevant to what it has been designed to do.
--- fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c +26 -20
@@ -89,7 +89,13 @@ static int fanotify_get_response(struct fsnotify_group *group,return ret; } -static bool fanotify_should_send_event (struct fsnotify_iter_info *iter_info, +/* +* This function returns a mask for a event that only contains the flags +* that have been specifically requested by the user. Flags that may have +* been included within the event mask, but have not been ecplicitly +* requested by the user, will not be present in the returned mask. +*/ +static u32 fanotify_group_event_mask (struct fsnotify_iter_info *iter_info,u32 event_mask,const void *data,int data_type) {
@@ -101,21 +107,21 @@ static bool fanotify_should_send_event(struct fsnotify_iter_info *iter_info,pr_debug ("%s: report_mask=%x mask=%x data=%p data_type=%d\n" , __func__, iter_info->report_mask, event_mask, data, data_type); -/* if we don't have enough info to send an event to userspace say no */ +/* If we don't have enough info to send an event to userspace say no */ if (data_type !=FSNOTIFY_EVENT_PATH ) -return false; +return 0 ; -/* sorry, fanotify only gives a damn about files and dirs */ +/* Sorry, fanotify only gives a damn about files and dirs */ if (!d_is_reg (path->dentry) && !d_can_lookup (path->dentry)) -return false; +return 0 ;fsnotify_foreach_obj_type (type) {if (!fsnotify_iter_should_report_type (iter_info, type))continue ; mark = iter_info->marks[type];/* -* if the event is for a child and this inode doesn't care about +* If the event is for a child and this inode doesn't care about * events on the child, don't send it! */ if (type == FSNOTIFY_OBJ_TYPE_INODE &&
@@ -129,13 +135,10 @@ static bool fanotify_should_send_event(struct fsnotify_iter_info *iter_info,if (d_is_dir (path->dentry) && !(marks_mask &FS_ISDIR & ~marks_ignored_mask)) -return false; - -if (event_mask &FANOTIFY_OUTGOING_EVENTS & - marks_mask & ~marks_ignored_mask) -return true; +return 0 ; -return false; +return event_mask &FANOTIFY_OUTGOING_EVENTS & marks_mask & + ~marks_ignored_mask; } struct fanotify_event_info *fanotify_alloc_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
@@ -194,6 +197,7 @@ static int fanotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group, struct fsnotify_iter_info *iter_info) {int ret =0 ; +u32 event_mask =0 ;struct fanotify_event_info *event;struct fsnotify_event *fsn_event;
@@ -211,13 +215,15 @@ static int fanotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FANOTIFY_EVENT_BITS ) !=11 ); -if (!fanotify_should_send_event (iter_info, mask, data, data_type)) + event_mask =fanotify_group_event_mask (iter_info, mask, data, + data_type); +if (!event_mask)return 0 ;pr_debug ("%s: group=%p inode=%p mask=%x\n" , __func__, group, inode, - mask); + event_mask); -if (fanotify_is_perm_event (mask)) { +if (fanotify_is_perm_event (event_mask)) {/* * fsnotify_prepare_user_wait() fails if we race with mark * deletion. Just let the operation pass in that case.
@@ -226,14 +232,14 @@ static int fanotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,return 0 ; } - event =fanotify_alloc_event (group, inode, mask, data); + event =fanotify_alloc_event (group, inode, event_mask, data); ret = -ENOMEM ;if (unlikely (!event)) {/* * We don't queue overflow events for permission events as * there the access is denied and so no event is in fact lost. */ -if (!fanotify_is_perm_event (mask)) +if (!fanotify_is_perm_event (event_mask))fsnotify_queue_overflow (group); goto finish; }
@@ -242,18 +248,18 @@ static int fanotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group, ret =fsnotify_add_event (group, fsn_event, fanotify_merge);if (ret) {/* Permission events shouldn't be merged */ -BUG_ON (ret ==1 && mask &FANOTIFY_PERM_EVENTS ); +BUG_ON (ret ==1 && event_mask &FANOTIFY_PERM_EVENTS );/* Our event wasn't used in the end. Free it. */ fsnotify_destroy_event (group, fsn_event); ret =0 ; - }else if (fanotify_is_perm_event (mask)) { + }else if (fanotify_is_perm_event (event_mask)) { ret =fanotify_get_response (group,FANOTIFY_PE (fsn_event), iter_info);fsnotify_destroy_event (group, fsn_event); } finish: -if (fanotify_is_perm_event (mask)) +if (fanotify_is_perm_event (event_mask))fsnotify_finish_user_wait (iter_info);return ret;
Signature · 1 line
2.17.2
Amir Goldstein
reviewerRe: [PATCH v4 2/3] fanotify: return only user requested event types in event mask
Quoted 28 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
Modified
fanotify_should_send_event()so that it now returns a mask for a event that contains ONLY flags for the event types that have been specifically requested by the user. Flags that may have been included within the event mask, but have not been explicitly requested by the user will not be present in the returned value.As an example, given the situation where a user requests events of type
FAN_OPEN. Traditionally, the event mask returned within an event that occurred on a filesystem object that has been marked for monitoring and is opened, will only ever have theFAN_OPENbit set. With the introduction of the new flags likeFAN_OPEN_EXEC, and perhaps any other future event flags, there is a possibility of the returned event mask containing more than a single bit set, despite having only requested the single event type. Prior to these modifications performed tofanotify_should_send_event(), a user would have received a bundled event mask containing flagsFAN_OPENandFAN_OPEN_EXECin the instance that a file was opened for execution viaexecve(), for example. This means that a user would receive event types in the returned event mask that have not been requested. This runs the possibility of breaking existing systems and causing other unforeseen issues.To mitigate this possibility,
fanotify_should_send_event()has been modified to return the event mask containing ONLY event types explicitly requested by the user. This means that we will NOT report events that the user did no set a mask for, and we will NOT report events that the user has set an ignore mask for.
Quoted 5 lines
The function name
fanotify_should_send_event()has also been updated so that it's more relevant to what it has been designed to do.Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>---
I feel that this story could be shorter and less confusing, but I cannot offer a better version, nor do I object to this version. Maybe Jan can give it some final touches.
Thanks,
Amir.
Jan Kara
maintainerRe: [PATCH v4 2/3] fanotify: return only user requested event types in event mask
In reply to Matthew BobrowskiHi,
the patch looks good. Just couple nits:
Quoted 1 line · Matthew Bobrowski
Modified
fanotify_should_send_event()so that it now returns a mask for
^^ Modify
Quoted 1 line
a event that contains ONLY flags for the event types that have been
^ an
Quoted 38 lines
specifically requested by the user. Flags that may have been included within the event mask, but have not been explicitly requested by the user will not be present in the returned value.
As an example, given the situation where a user requests events of type
FAN_OPEN. Traditionally, the event mask returned within an event that occurred on a filesystem object that has been marked for monitoring and is opened, will only ever have theFAN_OPENbit set. With the introduction of the new flags likeFAN_OPEN_EXEC, and perhaps any other future event flags, there is a possibility of the returned event mask containing more than a single bit set, despite having only requested the single event type. Prior to these modifications performed tofanotify_should_send_event(), a user would have received a bundled event mask containing flagsFAN_OPENandFAN_OPEN_EXECin the instance that a file was opened for execution viaexecve(), for example. This means that a user would receive event types in the returned event mask that have not been requested. This runs the possibility of breaking existing systems and causing other unforeseen issues.To mitigate this possibility,
fanotify_should_send_event()has been modified to return the event mask containing ONLY event types explicitly requested by the user. This means that we will NOT report events that the user did no set a mask for, and we will NOT report events that the user has set an ignore mask for.The function name
fanotify_should_send_event()has also been updated so that it's more relevant to what it has been designed to do.Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>--- fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c +0
-0
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c static int fanotify_get_response(struct fsnotify_group *group, · line 93
Quoted 6 lines
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c +2
-1@@ -89,7 +89,13 @@ static int fanotify_get_response(struct fsnotify_group *group,return ret; } -static bool fanotify_should_send_event(struct fsnotify_iter_info *iter_info, +/* +* This function returns a mask for a event that only contains the flags
^^ an
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c static int fanotify_get_response(struct fsnotify_group *group, · line 95
Quoted 2 lines
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c +2
-0+* that have been specifically requested by the user. Flags that may have +* been included within the event mask, but have not been ecplicitly
^^ explicitly
Quoted 5 lines
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c +3
-0+* requested by the user, will not be present in the returned mask. +*/ +static u32 fanotify_group_event_mask (struct fsnotify_iter_info *iter_info,u32 event_mask,const void *data,int data_type)
<snip>
Quoted 10 lines
struct
fanotify_event_info*fanotify_alloc_event(structfsnotify_group*group,fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c +1
-0@@ -194,6 +197,7 @@ static int fanotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group, struct fsnotify_iter_info *iter_info) {int ret =0 ; +u32 event_mask =0 ;struct fanotify_event_info *event;struct fsnotify_event *fsn_event;
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c static int fanotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group, · line 219
Quoted 6 lines
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c +2
-1@@ -211,13 +215,15 @@ static int fanotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FANOTIFY_EVENT_BITS ) !=11 ); -if (!fanotify_should_send_event (iter_info, mask, data, data_type)) + event_mask =fanotify_group_event_mask (iter_info, mask, data, + data_type);
^^^ Why don't you store the result in 'mask'? You don't need
the original mask later anyway, it reduces churn and also possibility of getting things wrong in the future...
Honza
Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR
Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] fanotify: return only user requested event types in event mask
Quoted 8 lines · Jan Kara
Hi,
the patch looks good. Just couple nits:
Quoted 1 line · Matthew Bobrowski
Modified
fanotify_should_send_event()so that it now returns a mask for^^ Modify
Updated.
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line
a event that contains ONLY flags for the event types that have been
^ an
Updated.
Quoted 41 lines
Quoted 41 lines
specifically requested by the user. Flags that may have been included within the event mask, but have not been explicitly requested by the user will not be present in the returned value.
As an example, given the situation where a user requests events of type
FAN_OPEN. Traditionally, the event mask returned within an event that occurred on a filesystem object that has been marked for monitoring and is opened, will only ever have theFAN_OPENbit set. With the introduction of the new flags likeFAN_OPEN_EXEC, and perhaps any other future event flags, there is a possibility of the returned event mask containing more than a single bit set, despite having only requested the single event type. Prior to these modifications performed tofanotify_should_send_event(), a user would have received a bundled event mask containing flagsFAN_OPENandFAN_OPEN_EXECin the instance that a file was opened for execution viaexecve(), for example. This means that a user would receive event types in the returned event mask that have not been requested. This runs the possibility of breaking existing systems and causing other unforeseen issues.To mitigate this possibility,
fanotify_should_send_event()has been modified to return the event mask containing ONLY event types explicitly requested by the user. This means that we will NOT report events that the user did no set a mask for, and we will NOT report events that the user has set an ignore mask for.The function name
fanotify_should_send_event()has also been updated so that it's more relevant to what it has been designed to do.Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>--- fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c +0
-0@@ -89,7 +89,13 @@ static int fanotify_get_response(struct fsnotify_group *group,return ret; }
Quoted 4 lines
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c static int fanotify_get_response(struct fsnotify_group *group, · line 93
Quoted 3 lines
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c +2
-1-static bool fanotify_should_send_event(struct fsnotify_iter_info *iter_info, +/* +* This function returns a mask for a event that only contains the flags ^^ an
Updated.
Quoted 3 lines
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c static int fanotify_get_response(struct fsnotify_group *group, · line 95
Quoted 2 lines
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c +2
-0+* that have been specifically requested by the user. Flags that may have +* been included within the event mask, but have not been ecplicitly ^^ explicitly
Updated.
Quoted 19 lines
Quoted 5 lines
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c +3
-0+* requested by the user, will not be present in the returned mask. +*/ +static u32 fanotify_group_event_mask (struct fsnotify_iter_info *iter_info,u32 event_mask,const void *data,int data_type)<snip>
Quoted 11 lines
struct
fanotify_event_info*fanotify_alloc_event(structfsnotify_group*group,fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c +1
-0@@ -194,6 +197,7 @@ static int fanotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group, struct fsnotify_iter_info *iter_info) {int ret =0 ; +u32 event_mask =0 ;struct fanotify_event_info *event;struct fsnotify_event *fsn_event;@@ -211,13 +215,15 @@ static int fanotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
Quoted 8 lines
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c static int fanotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group, · line 219
Quoted 5 lines
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c +2
-1BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FANOTIFY_EVENT_BITS ) !=11 ); -if (!fanotify_should_send_event (iter_info, mask, data, data_type)) + event_mask =fanotify_group_event_mask (iter_info, mask, data, + data_type);^^^ Why don't you store the result in 'mask'? You don't need
the original mask later anyway, it reduces churn and also possibility of getting things wrong in the future...
Good point. There's no real reason why we can't overwrite the original 'mask' value with the returned value from fanotify_group_event_mask(). That being said, I've gone ahead and applied updates accordingly.
I will post through the updates within an updated patch series.
PATCH v4 3/3 fanotify: introduce new event type FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERM
In reply to Matthew BobrowskiA new event type FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERM has been defined. This allows users to receive and grant access to files that are intending to be opened for execution.
This acts in the same manor as previous permission event types, meaning that a access response is required from the application to permit further operations on the file. The event flag is set specifically when the __FMODE_EXEC flag is set within file->f_flags in the fsnotify_perm() hook.
--- fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 3 ++- fs/notify/fsnotify.c | 2 +- include/linux/fanotify.h | 3 ++- include/linux/fsnotify.h | 10 ++++++---- include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h | 7 ++++--- include/uapi/linux/fanotify.h | 1 + 6 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c +2 -1
@@ -212,8 +212,9 @@ static int fanotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,BUILD_BUG_ON (FAN_ACCESS_PERM !=FS_ACCESS_PERM );BUILD_BUG_ON (FAN_ONDIR !=FS_ISDIR );BUILD_BUG_ON (FAN_OPEN_EXEC !=FS_OPEN_EXEC ); +BUILD_BUG_ON (FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERM !=FS_OPEN_EXEC_PERM ); -BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FANOTIFY_EVENT_BITS ) !=11 ); +BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FANOTIFY_EVENT_BITS ) !=12 ); event_mask =fanotify_group_event_mask (iter_info, mask, data, data_type);
fs/notify/fsnotify.c +1 -1
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static __init int fsnotify_init(void) {int ret; -BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FSNOTIFY_BITS ) !=24 ); +BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FSNOTIFY_BITS ) !=25 ); ret =init_srcu_struct (&fsnotify_mark_srcu);if (ret)
include/linux/fanotify.h +2 -1
@@ -42,7 +42,8 @@ FAN_CLOSE | FAN_OPEN | FAN_OPEN_EXEC)/* Events that require a permission response from user */ -#define FANOTIFY_PERM_EVENTS (FAN_OPEN_PERM | FAN_ACCESS_PERM) +#define FANOTIFY_PERM_EVENTS (FAN_OPEN_PERM | FAN_ACCESS_PERM | \ + FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERM)/* Extra flags that may be reported with event or control handling of events */ #define FANOTIFY_EVENT_FLAGS (FAN_EVENT_ON_CHILD | FAN_ONDIR)
include/linux/fsnotify.h +6 -4
@@ -38,12 +38,14 @@ static inline int fsnotify_perm(struct file *file, int mask)return 0 ;if (!(mask & (MAY_READ |MAY_OPEN )))return 0 ; -if (mask &MAY_OPEN ) +if (mask &MAY_OPEN ) { fsnotify_mask =FS_OPEN_PERM ; -else if (mask &MAY_READ ) + +if (file->f_flags & __FMODE_EXEC) + fsnotify_mask |=FS_OPEN_EXEC_PERM ; + }else if (mask &MAY_READ ) { fsnotify_mask =FS_ACCESS_PERM ; -else -BUG (); + } ret =fsnotify_parent (path,NULL , fsnotify_mask);if (ret)
include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h +4 -3
@@ -44,8 +44,9 @@#define FS_Q_OVERFLOW 0x00004000/* Event queued overflowed */ #define FS_IN_IGNORED 0x00008000/* last inotify event here */ -#define FS_OPEN_PERM 0x00010000/* open event in an permission hook */ +#define FS_OPEN_PERM 0x00010000/* open event in a permission hook */ #define FS_ACCESS_PERM 0x00020000/* access event in a permissions hook */ +#define FS_OPEN_EXEC_PERM 0x00040000/* open/exec in a permission hook */ #define FS_EXCL_UNLINK 0x04000000/* do not send events if object is unlinked */ #define FS_ISDIR 0x40000000/* event occurred against dir */
@@ -64,7 +65,7 @@FS_CLOSE_WRITE |FS_CLOSE_NOWRITE |FS_OPEN |\FS_MOVED_FROM |FS_MOVED_TO |FS_CREATE |\FS_DELETE |FS_OPEN_PERM |FS_ACCESS_PERM |\ - FS_OPEN_EXEC) + FS_OPEN_EXEC | FS_OPEN_EXEC_PERM) #define FS_MOVE (FS_MOVED_FROM | FS_MOVED_TO)
@@ -77,7 +78,7 @@ FS_DELETE | FS_DELETE_SELF | FS_MOVE_SELF | \ FS_UNMOUNT | FS_Q_OVERFLOW | FS_IN_IGNORED | \ FS_OPEN_PERM | FS_ACCESS_PERM | FS_DN_RENAME |\ - FS_OPEN_EXEC) + FS_OPEN_EXEC | FS_OPEN_EXEC_PERM)/* Extra flags that may be reported with event or control handling of events */ #define ALL_FSNOTIFY_FLAGS (FS_EXCL_UNLINK | FS_ISDIR | FS_IN_ONESHOT | \
include/uapi/linux/fanotify.h +1 -0
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@#define FAN_OPEN_PERM 0x00010000/* File open in perm check */ #define FAN_ACCESS_PERM 0x00020000/* File accessed in perm check */ +#define FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERM 0x00040000/* File open/exec in perm check */ #define FAN_ONDIR 0x40000000/* event occurred against dir */
Signature · 1 line
2.17.2
Jan Kara
maintainerRe: [PATCH v4 3/3] fanotify: introduce new event type FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERM
Quoted 3 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
A new event type
FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERMhas been defined. This allows users to receive and grant access to files that are intending to be opened for execution.
The same note here as for FAN_OPEN_EXEC.
Quoted 7 lines
This acts in the same manor as previous permission event types, meaning that a access response is required from the application to permit further operations on the file. The event flag is set specifically when the
__FMODE_EXECflag is set withinfile->f_flagsin thefsnotify_perm()hook.Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>
And a general question: Do I understand right that your audit application needs this event type? I'm asking because so far what Steve wrote me was about pattern matching of fanotify events to detect when something happens. So it's not clear to me how permission event fits into that.
Honza
Quoted 122 lines
--- fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 3 ++- fs/notify/fsnotify.c | 2 +- include/linux/fanotify.h | 3 ++- include/linux/fsnotify.h | 10 ++++++---- include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h | 7 ++++--- include/uapi/linux/fanotify.h | 1 + 6 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c +2
-1@@ -212,8 +212,9 @@ static int fanotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,BUILD_BUG_ON (FAN_ACCESS_PERM !=FS_ACCESS_PERM );BUILD_BUG_ON (FAN_ONDIR !=FS_ISDIR );BUILD_BUG_ON (FAN_OPEN_EXEC !=FS_OPEN_EXEC ); +BUILD_BUG_ON (FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERM !=FS_OPEN_EXEC_PERM ); -BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FANOTIFY_EVENT_BITS ) !=11 ); +BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FANOTIFY_EVENT_BITS ) !=12 ); event_mask =fanotify_group_event_mask (iter_info, mask, data, data_type);fs/notify/fsnotify.c +1
-1@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static __init int fsnotify_init(void) {int ret; -BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FSNOTIFY_BITS ) !=24 ); +BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FSNOTIFY_BITS ) !=25 ); ret =init_srcu_struct (&fsnotify_mark_srcu);if (ret)include/linux/fanotify.h +2
-1@@ -42,7 +42,8 @@ FAN_CLOSE | FAN_OPEN | FAN_OPEN_EXEC)/* Events that require a permission response from user */ -#define FANOTIFY_PERM_EVENTS (FAN_OPEN_PERM | FAN_ACCESS_PERM) +#define FANOTIFY_PERM_EVENTS (FAN_OPEN_PERM | FAN_ACCESS_PERM | \ + FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERM)/* Extra flags that may be reported with event or control handling of events */ #define FANOTIFY_EVENT_FLAGS (FAN_EVENT_ON_CHILD | FAN_ONDIR)include/linux/fsnotify.h +6
-4@@ -38,12 +38,14 @@ static inline int fsnotify_perm(struct file *file, int mask)return 0 ;if (!(mask & (MAY_READ |MAY_OPEN )))return 0 ; -if (mask &MAY_OPEN ) +if (mask &MAY_OPEN ) { fsnotify_mask =FS_OPEN_PERM ; -else if (mask &MAY_READ ) + +if (file->f_flags & __FMODE_EXEC) + fsnotify_mask |=FS_OPEN_EXEC_PERM ; + }else if (mask &MAY_READ ) { fsnotify_mask =FS_ACCESS_PERM ; -else -BUG (); + } ret =fsnotify_parent (path,NULL , fsnotify_mask);if (ret)include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h +4
-3@@ -44,8 +44,9 @@#define FS_Q_OVERFLOW 0x00004000/* Event queued overflowed */ #define FS_IN_IGNORED 0x00008000/* last inotify event here */ -#define FS_OPEN_PERM 0x00010000/* open event in an permission hook */ +#define FS_OPEN_PERM 0x00010000/* open event in a permission hook */ #define FS_ACCESS_PERM 0x00020000/* access event in a permissions hook */ +#define FS_OPEN_EXEC_PERM 0x00040000/* open/exec in a permission hook */ #define FS_EXCL_UNLINK 0x04000000/* do not send events if object is unlinked */ #define FS_ISDIR 0x40000000/* event occurred against dir */ @@ -64,7 +65,7 @@FS_CLOSE_WRITE |FS_CLOSE_NOWRITE |FS_OPEN |\FS_MOVED_FROM |FS_MOVED_TO |FS_CREATE |\FS_DELETE |FS_OPEN_PERM |FS_ACCESS_PERM |\ - FS_OPEN_EXEC) + FS_OPEN_EXEC | FS_OPEN_EXEC_PERM) #define FS_MOVE (FS_MOVED_FROM | FS_MOVED_TO)@@ -77,7 +78,7 @@ FS_DELETE | FS_DELETE_SELF | FS_MOVE_SELF | \ FS_UNMOUNT | FS_Q_OVERFLOW | FS_IN_IGNORED | \ FS_OPEN_PERM | FS_ACCESS_PERM | FS_DN_RENAME |\ - FS_OPEN_EXEC) + FS_OPEN_EXEC | FS_OPEN_EXEC_PERM)/* Extra flags that may be reported with event or control handling of events */ #define ALL_FSNOTIFY_FLAGS (FS_EXCL_UNLINK | FS_ISDIR | FS_IN_ONESHOT | \include/uapi/linux/fanotify.h +1
-0@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@#define FAN_OPEN_PERM 0x00010000/* File open in perm check */ #define FAN_ACCESS_PERM 0x00020000/* File accessed in perm check */ +#define FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERM 0x00040000/* File open/exec in perm check */ #define FAN_ONDIR 0x40000000/* event occurred against dir */ Signature · 1 line
2.17.2
Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR
Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] fanotify: introduce new event type FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERM
Quoted 6 lines · Jan Kara
Quoted 3 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
A new event type
FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERMhas been defined. This allows users to receive and grant access to files that are intending to be opened for execution.The same note here as for
FAN_OPEN_EXEC.
Updated.
I will include the updates to this within the updated patch series.
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 7 lines
This acts in the same manor as previous permission event types, meaning that a access response is required from the application to permit further operations on the file. The event flag is set specifically when the
__FMODE_EXECflag is set withinfile->f_flagsin thefsnotify_perm()hook.Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>And a general question: Do I understand right that your audit application needs this event type?
Yes, your understanding is correct. The application we're developing requires this event type.
Quoted 3 lines
I'm asking because so far what Steve wrote me was about pattern matching of fanotify events to detect when something happens. So it's not clear to me how permission event fits into that.
That detection for when "something happens", is precisely to do with understanding when a file is opened for execution. We use permission events within the application we're developing to either ALLOW or DENY a particular action being performed against an object. At the moment, we don't have any way to determine what actually caused a watched object to be opened, so this is to aid with that, and also help us make a better judgment how we're to respond to a particular action.
Quoted 125 lines
Quoted 122 lines
--- fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 3 ++- fs/notify/fsnotify.c | 2 +- include/linux/fanotify.h | 3 ++- include/linux/fsnotify.h | 10 ++++++---- include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h | 7 ++++--- include/uapi/linux/fanotify.h | 1 + 6 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c +2
-1@@ -212,8 +212,9 @@ static int fanotify_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,BUILD_BUG_ON (FAN_ACCESS_PERM !=FS_ACCESS_PERM );BUILD_BUG_ON (FAN_ONDIR !=FS_ISDIR );BUILD_BUG_ON (FAN_OPEN_EXEC !=FS_OPEN_EXEC ); +BUILD_BUG_ON (FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERM !=FS_OPEN_EXEC_PERM ); -BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FANOTIFY_EVENT_BITS ) !=11 ); +BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FANOTIFY_EVENT_BITS ) !=12 ); event_mask =fanotify_group_event_mask (iter_info, mask, data, data_type);fs/notify/fsnotify.c +1
-1@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static __init int fsnotify_init(void) {int ret; -BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FSNOTIFY_BITS ) !=24 ); +BUILD_BUG_ON (HWEIGHT32 (ALL_FSNOTIFY_BITS ) !=25 ); ret =init_srcu_struct (&fsnotify_mark_srcu);if (ret)include/linux/fanotify.h +2
-1@@ -42,7 +42,8 @@ FAN_CLOSE | FAN_OPEN | FAN_OPEN_EXEC)/* Events that require a permission response from user */ -#define FANOTIFY_PERM_EVENTS (FAN_OPEN_PERM | FAN_ACCESS_PERM) +#define FANOTIFY_PERM_EVENTS (FAN_OPEN_PERM | FAN_ACCESS_PERM | \ + FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERM)/* Extra flags that may be reported with event or control handling of events */ #define FANOTIFY_EVENT_FLAGS (FAN_EVENT_ON_CHILD | FAN_ONDIR)include/linux/fsnotify.h +6
-4@@ -38,12 +38,14 @@ static inline int fsnotify_perm(struct file *file, int mask)return 0 ;if (!(mask & (MAY_READ |MAY_OPEN )))return 0 ; -if (mask &MAY_OPEN ) +if (mask &MAY_OPEN ) { fsnotify_mask =FS_OPEN_PERM ; -else if (mask &MAY_READ ) + +if (file->f_flags & __FMODE_EXEC) + fsnotify_mask |=FS_OPEN_EXEC_PERM ; + }else if (mask &MAY_READ ) { fsnotify_mask =FS_ACCESS_PERM ; -else -BUG (); + } ret =fsnotify_parent (path,NULL , fsnotify_mask);if (ret)include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h +4
-3@@ -44,8 +44,9 @@#define FS_Q_OVERFLOW 0x00004000/* Event queued overflowed */ #define FS_IN_IGNORED 0x00008000/* last inotify event here */ -#define FS_OPEN_PERM 0x00010000/* open event in an permission hook */ +#define FS_OPEN_PERM 0x00010000/* open event in a permission hook */ #define FS_ACCESS_PERM 0x00020000/* access event in a permissions hook */ +#define FS_OPEN_EXEC_PERM 0x00040000/* open/exec in a permission hook */ #define FS_EXCL_UNLINK 0x04000000/* do not send events if object is unlinked */ #define FS_ISDIR 0x40000000/* event occurred against dir */ @@ -64,7 +65,7 @@FS_CLOSE_WRITE |FS_CLOSE_NOWRITE |FS_OPEN |\FS_MOVED_FROM |FS_MOVED_TO |FS_CREATE |\FS_DELETE |FS_OPEN_PERM |FS_ACCESS_PERM |\ - FS_OPEN_EXEC) + FS_OPEN_EXEC | FS_OPEN_EXEC_PERM) #define FS_MOVE (FS_MOVED_FROM | FS_MOVED_TO)@@ -77,7 +78,7 @@ FS_DELETE | FS_DELETE_SELF | FS_MOVE_SELF | \ FS_UNMOUNT | FS_Q_OVERFLOW | FS_IN_IGNORED | \ FS_OPEN_PERM | FS_ACCESS_PERM | FS_DN_RENAME |\ - FS_OPEN_EXEC) + FS_OPEN_EXEC | FS_OPEN_EXEC_PERM)/* Extra flags that may be reported with event or control handling of events */ #define ALL_FSNOTIFY_FLAGS (FS_EXCL_UNLINK | FS_ISDIR | FS_IN_ONESHOT | \include/uapi/linux/fanotify.h +1
-0@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@#define FAN_OPEN_PERM 0x00010000/* File open in perm check */ #define FAN_ACCESS_PERM 0x00020000/* File accessed in perm check */ +#define FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERM 0x00040000/* File open/exec in perm check */ #define FAN_ONDIR 0x40000000/* event occurred against dir */ Signature · 1 line
2.17.2Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR
Jan Kara
maintainerRe: [PATCH v4 3/3] fanotify: introduce new event type FAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERM
Quoted 10 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
Quoted 2 lines
And a general question: Do I understand right that your audit application needs this event type?
Yes, your understanding is correct. The application we're developing requires this event type.
Quoted 3 lines
I'm asking because so far what Steve wrote me was about pattern matching of fanotify events to detect when something happens. So it's not clear to me how permission event fits into that.
Quoted 7 lines
That detection for when "something happens", is precisely to do with understanding when a file is opened for execution. We use permission events within the application we're developing to either ALLOW or DENY a particular action being performed against an object. At the moment, we don't have any way to determine what actually caused a watched object to be opened, so this is to aid with that, and also help us make a better judgment how we're to respond to a particular action.
OK, understood. I just wanted to be sure I understand what you need correctly. Thanks for explanation.
Honza
Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR
Quoted 39 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
Currently, the fanotify API does not provide a means for user space applications to receive events when a file has been opened specifically for execution. New event types
FAN_OPEN_EXECandFAN_OPEN_EXEC_PERMhave been introduced in order to provide users this capability.These event types, when either are explicitly requested by the user, will be returned within the event mask when a marked file object is being opened has
__FMODE_EXECset as one of the flags foropen_flag.Linux is used as an operating system in some products, with an environment that can be certified under the Common Criteria Operating System Protection Profile (OSPP). This is a formal threat model for a class of technology. It requires specific countermeasures to mitigate threats. It requires documentation to explain how a product implements these countermeasures. It requires proof via a test suite to demonstrate that the requirements are met, observed and checked by an independent qualified third party. The latest set of requirements for OSPP v4.2 can be found here:
https://www.niap-ccevs.org/Profile/Info.cfm?PPID=424&id=424
If you look on page 58, you will see the following requirement:
FPT_SRP_EXT.1 Software Restriction Policies FPT_SRP_EXT.1.1 administrator specified [selection:
file path,
file digital signature,
version,
hash,
[assignment: other characteristics]
]This patch is to help aid in meeting this requirement.
I've also written the required updates for the man-pages project. You can find the necessary changes for these new event types within the following commit:
Quoted 8 lines
https://github.com/matthewbobrowski/man-pages/commit/d075dd8c8dfe19fccb9ea91f9550ea41b6e67334
Please note that all modifications here are based on the changes Amir has made around deprecating some of the previously exposed UAPI constants. The branch which my changes are based on can be found here:
There is already a newer version merge to Jan's fsnotify branch. You should reabse on that branch, althrough I don't see any immediate merge conflicts.
Quoted 3 lines
Lastly, thanks to both Amir and Jan for their help and feedback along the way, truly appreciated.
Jan,
You may add
on the series.
Thanks,
Amir.