Skip to contentSkip to conversation

crypto: some hardening against AES cache-timing attacks

PATCH In review Eric Biggers 3 participants 9 messages Oct 18, 2018 – Nov 9, 2018

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

v3 cover crypto: some hardening against AES cache-timing attacks

This series makes the "aes-fixed-time" and "aes-arm" implementations of AES more resistant to cache-timing attacks.

Note that even after these changes, the implementations still aren't necessarily guaranteed to be constant-time; see
https://cr.yp.to/antiforgery/cachetiming-20050414.pdf for a discussion of the many difficulties involved in writing truly constant-time AES software. But it's valuable to make such attacks more difficult.

Changed since v2:
- In aes-arm, move the IRQ disable/enable into the assembly file.
- Other aes-arm tweaks.
- Add Kconfig help text.

Thanks to Ard Biesheuvel for the suggestions.

Eric Biggers (2):
crypto: aes_ti - disable interrupts while accessing S-box
crypto: arm/aes - add some hardening against cache-timing attacks

 arch/arm/crypto/Kconfig           |  9 +++++
 arch/arm/crypto/aes-cipher-core.S | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 crypto/Kconfig                    |  3 +-
 crypto/aes_generic.c              |  9 +++--
 crypto/aes_ti.c                   | 18 +++++++++
 5 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
#1 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/2 crypto: aes_ti - disable interrupts while accessing S-box

From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>

In the "aes-fixed-time" AES implementation, disable interrupts while accessing the S-box, in order to make cache-timing attacks more difficult. Previously it was possible for the CPU to be interrupted while the S-box was loaded into L1 cache, potentially evicting the cachelines and causing later table lookups to be time-variant.

In tests I did on x86 and ARM, this doesn't affect performance significantly. Responsiveness is potentially a concern, but interrupts are only disabled for a single AES block.

Note that even after this change, the implementation still isn't necessarily guaranteed to be constant-time; see
https://cr.yp.to/antiforgery/cachetiming-20050414.pdf for a discussion of the many difficulties involved in writing truly constant-time AES software. But it's valuable to make such attacks more difficult.

---
 crypto/Kconfig  |  3 ++-
 crypto/aes_ti.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
crypto/Kconfig +2 -1
index f2c19cc63c778..f6db916f1b760 100644
@@ -1006,7 +1006,8 @@ config CRYPTO_AES_TI
 	  8 for decryption), this implementation only uses just two S-boxes of
 	  256 bytes each, and attempts to eliminate data dependent latencies by
 	  prefetching the entire table into the cache at the start of each
-	  block.
+	  block. Interrupts are also disabled to avoid races where cachelines
+	  are evicted when the CPU is interrupted to do something else.
 
 config CRYPTO_AES_586
 	tristate "AES cipher algorithms (i586)"
crypto/aes_ti.c +18 -0
index 03023b2290e8e..1ff9785b30f55 100644
@@ -269,6 +269,7 @@ static void aesti_encrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *out, const u8 *in)
 	const u32 *rkp = ctx->key_enc + 4;
 	int rounds = 6 + ctx->key_length / 4;
 	u32 st0[4], st1[4];
+	unsigned long flags;
 	int round;
 
 	st0[0] = ctx->key_enc[0] ^ get_unaligned_le32(in);
@@ -276,6 +277,12 @@ static void aesti_encrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *out, const u8 *in)
 	st0[2] = ctx->key_enc[2] ^ get_unaligned_le32(in + 8);
 	st0[3] = ctx->key_enc[3] ^ get_unaligned_le32(in + 12);
 
+	/*
+	 * Temporarily disable interrupts to avoid races where cachelines are
+	 * evicted when the CPU is interrupted to do something else.
+	 */
+	local_irq_save(flags);
+
 	st0[0] ^= __aesti_sbox[ 0] ^ __aesti_sbox[128];
 	st0[1] ^= __aesti_sbox[32] ^ __aesti_sbox[160];
 	st0[2] ^= __aesti_sbox[64] ^ __aesti_sbox[192];
@@ -300,6 +307,8 @@ static void aesti_encrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *out, const u8 *in)
 	put_unaligned_le32(subshift(st1, 1) ^ rkp[5], out + 4);
 	put_unaligned_le32(subshift(st1, 2) ^ rkp[6], out + 8);
 	put_unaligned_le32(subshift(st1, 3) ^ rkp[7], out + 12);
+
+	local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 
 static void aesti_decrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *out, const u8 *in)
@@ -308,6 +317,7 @@ static void aesti_decrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *out, const u8 *in)
 	const u32 *rkp = ctx->key_dec + 4;
 	int rounds = 6 + ctx->key_length / 4;
 	u32 st0[4], st1[4];
+	unsigned long flags;
 	int round;
 
 	st0[0] = ctx->key_dec[0] ^ get_unaligned_le32(in);
@@ -315,6 +325,12 @@ static void aesti_decrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *out, const u8 *in)
 	st0[2] = ctx->key_dec[2] ^ get_unaligned_le32(in + 8);
 	st0[3] = ctx->key_dec[3] ^ get_unaligned_le32(in + 12);
 
+	/*
+	 * Temporarily disable interrupts to avoid races where cachelines are
+	 * evicted when the CPU is interrupted to do something else.
+	 */
+	local_irq_save(flags);
+
 	st0[0] ^= __aesti_inv_sbox[ 0] ^ __aesti_inv_sbox[128];
 	st0[1] ^= __aesti_inv_sbox[32] ^ __aesti_inv_sbox[160];
 	st0[2] ^= __aesti_inv_sbox[64] ^ __aesti_inv_sbox[192];
@@ -339,6 +355,8 @@ static void aesti_decrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *out, const u8 *in)
 	put_unaligned_le32(inv_subshift(st1, 1) ^ rkp[5], out + 4);
 	put_unaligned_le32(inv_subshift(st1, 2) ^ rkp[6], out + 8);
 	put_unaligned_le32(inv_subshift(st1, 3) ^ rkp[7], out + 12);
+
+	local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 
 static struct crypto_alg aes_alg = {
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
#2 lore raw

PATCH v3 2/2 crypto: arm/aes - add some hardening against cache-timing attacks

In reply to Eric Biggers

From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>

Make the ARM scalar AES implementation closer to constant-time by disabling interrupts and prefetching the tables into L1 cache. This is feasible because due to ARM's "free" rotations, the main tables are only 1024 bytes instead of the usual 4096 used by most AES implementations.

On ARM Cortex-A7, the speed loss is only about 5%. The resulting code is still over twice as fast as aes_ti.c. Responsiveness is potentially a concern, but interrupts are only disabled for a single AES block.

Note that even after these changes, the implementation still isn't necessarily guaranteed to be constant-time; see
https://cr.yp.to/antiforgery/cachetiming-20050414.pdf for a discussion of the many difficulties involved in writing truly constant-time AES software. But it's valuable to make such attacks more difficult.

Much of this patch is based on patches suggested by Ard Biesheuvel.

---
 arch/arm/crypto/Kconfig           |  9 +++++
 arch/arm/crypto/aes-cipher-core.S | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 crypto/aes_generic.c              |  9 +++--
 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
arch/arm/crypto/Kconfig +9 -0
index ef0c7feea6e29..0473a8f683896 100644
@@ -69,6 +69,15 @@ config CRYPTO_AES_ARM
 	help
 	  Use optimized AES assembler routines for ARM platforms.
 
+	  On ARM processors without the Crypto Extensions, this is the
+	  fastest AES implementation for single blocks.  For multiple
+	  blocks, the NEON bit-sliced implementation is usually faster.
+
+	  This implementation may be vulnerable to cache timing attacks,
+	  since it uses lookup tables.  However, as countermeasures it
+	  disables IRQs and preloads the tables; it is hoped this makes
+	  such attacks very difficult.
+
 config CRYPTO_AES_ARM_BS
 	tristate "Bit sliced AES using NEON instructions"
 	depends on KERNEL_MODE_NEON
arch/arm/crypto/aes-cipher-core.S +52 -10

119 lines not on this page · raw message

crypto/aes_generic.c +5 -4
index ca554d57d01e9..13df33aca4631 100644
@@ -63,7 +63,8 @@ static inline u8 byte(const u32 x, const unsigned n)
 
 static const u32 rco_tab[10] = { 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 27, 54 };
 
-__visible const u32 crypto_ft_tab[4][256] = {
+/* cacheline-aligned to facilitate prefetching into cache */
+__visible const u32 crypto_ft_tab[4][256] __cacheline_aligned = {
 	{
 		0xa56363c6, 0x847c7cf8, 0x997777ee, 0x8d7b7bf6,
 		0x0df2f2ff, 0xbd6b6bd6, 0xb16f6fde, 0x54c5c591,
@@ -327,7 +328,7 @@ __visible const u32 crypto_ft_tab[4][256] = {
 	}
 };
 
-__visible const u32 crypto_fl_tab[4][256] = {
+__visible const u32 crypto_fl_tab[4][256] __cacheline_aligned = {
 	{
 		0x00000063, 0x0000007c, 0x00000077, 0x0000007b,
 		0x000000f2, 0x0000006b, 0x0000006f, 0x000000c5,
@@ -591,7 +592,7 @@ __visible const u32 crypto_fl_tab[4][256] = {
 	}
 };
 
-__visible const u32 crypto_it_tab[4][256] = {
+__visible const u32 crypto_it_tab[4][256] __cacheline_aligned = {
 	{
 		0x50a7f451, 0x5365417e, 0xc3a4171a, 0x965e273a,
 		0xcb6bab3b, 0xf1459d1f, 0xab58faac, 0x9303e34b,
@@ -855,7 +856,7 @@ __visible const u32 crypto_it_tab[4][256] = {
 	}
 };
 
-__visible const u32 crypto_il_tab[4][256] = {
+__visible const u32 crypto_il_tab[4][256] __cacheline_aligned = {
 	{
 		0x00000052, 0x00000009, 0x0000006a, 0x000000d5,
 		0x00000030, 0x00000036, 0x000000a5, 0x00000038,
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
Reviewed-by on v3 2/2
#3 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] crypto: arm/aes - add some hardening against cache-timing attacks

Quoted 11 lines · Eric Biggers

From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>

Make the ARM scalar AES implementation closer to constant-time by disabling interrupts and prefetching the tables into L1 cache. This is feasible because due to ARM's "free" rotations, the main tables are only 1024 bytes instead of the usual 4096 used by most AES implementations.

On ARM Cortex-A7, the speed loss is only about 5%. The resulting code is still over twice as fast as aes_ti.c. Responsiveness is potentially a concern, but interrupts are only disabled for a single AES block.

So that would be in the order of 700 cycles, based on the numbers you shared in v1 of the aes_ti.c patch. Does that sound about right? So that would be around 1 microsecond, which is really not a number to obsess about imo.

I considered another option, which is to detect whether an interrupt has been taken (by writing some canary value below that stack pointer in the location where the exception handler will preserve the value of sp, and checking at the end whether it has been modified) and doing a usleep_range(x, y) if that is the case.

But this is much simpler so let's only go there if we must.

Quoted 10 lines

Note that even after these changes, the implementation still isn't necessarily guaranteed to be constant-time; see
https://cr.yp.to/antiforgery/cachetiming-20050414.pdf for a discussion of the many difficulties involved in writing truly constant-time AES software. But it's valuable to make such attacks more difficult.

Much of this patch is based on patches suggested by Ard Biesheuvel.

Quoted 201 lines
---
 arch/arm/crypto/Kconfig           |  9 +++++
 arch/arm/crypto/aes-cipher-core.S | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 crypto/aes_generic.c              |  9 +++--
 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
arch/arm/crypto/Kconfig +9 -0
index ef0c7feea6e29..0473a8f683896 100644
@@ -69,6 +69,15 @@ config CRYPTO_AES_ARM
        help
          Use optimized AES assembler routines for ARM platforms.
 
+         On ARM processors without the Crypto Extensions, this is the
+         fastest AES implementation for single blocks.  For multiple
+         blocks, the NEON bit-sliced implementation is usually faster.
+
+         This implementation may be vulnerable to cache timing attacks,
+         since it uses lookup tables.  However, as countermeasures it
+         disables IRQs and preloads the tables; it is hoped this makes
+         such attacks very difficult.
+
 config CRYPTO_AES_ARM_BS
        tristate "Bit sliced AES using NEON instructions"
        depends on KERNEL_MODE_NEON
arch/arm/crypto/aes-cipher-core.S +52 -10
index 184d6c2d15d5e..f2d67c095e596 100644
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/linkage.h>
+#include <asm/assembler.h>
 #include <asm/cache.h>
 
        .text
@@ -41,7 +42,7 @@
        .endif
        .endm
 
-       .macro          __hround, out0, out1, in0, in1, in2, in3, t3, t4, enc, sz, op
+       .macro          __hround, out0, out1, in0, in1, in2, in3, t3, t4, enc, sz, op, oldcpsr
        __select        \out0, \in0, 0
        __select        t0, \in1, 1
        __load          \out0, \out0, 0, \sz, \op
@@ -73,6 +74,14 @@
        __load          t0, t0, 3, \sz, \op
        __load          \t4, \t4, 3, \sz, \op
 
+       .ifnb           \oldcpsr
+       /*
+        * This is the final round and we're done with all data-dependent table
+        * lookups, so we can safely re-enable interrupts.
+        */
+       restore_irqs    \oldcpsr
+       .endif
+
        eor             \out1, \out1, t1, ror #24
        eor             \out0, \out0, t2, ror #16
        ldm             rk!, {t1, t2}
@@ -83,14 +92,14 @@
        eor             \out1, \out1, t2
        .endm
 
-       .macro          fround, out0, out1, out2, out3, in0, in1, in2, in3, sz=2, op
+       .macro          fround, out0, out1, out2, out3, in0, in1, in2, in3, sz=2, op, oldcpsr
        __hround        \out0, \out1, \in0, \in1, \in2, \in3, \out2, \out3, 1, \sz, \op
-       __hround        \out2, \out3, \in2, \in3, \in0, \in1, \in1, \in2, 1, \sz, \op
+       __hround        \out2, \out3, \in2, \in3, \in0, \in1, \in1, \in2, 1, \sz, \op, \oldcpsr
        .endm
 
-       .macro          iround, out0, out1, out2, out3, in0, in1, in2, in3, sz=2, op
+       .macro          iround, out0, out1, out2, out3, in0, in1, in2, in3, sz=2, op, oldcpsr
        __hround        \out0, \out1, \in0, \in3, \in2, \in1, \out2, \out3, 0, \sz, \op
-       __hround        \out2, \out3, \in2, \in1, \in0, \in3, \in1, \in0, 0, \sz, \op
+       __hround        \out2, \out3, \in2, \in1, \in0, \in3, \in1, \in0, 0, \sz, \op, \oldcpsr
        .endm
 
        .macro          __rev, out, in
@@ -118,13 +127,14 @@
        .macro          do_crypt, round, ttab, ltab, bsz
        push            {r3-r11, lr}
 
+       // Load keys first, to reduce latency in case they're not cached yet.
+       ldm             rk!, {r8-r11}
+
        ldr             r4, [in]
        ldr             r5, [in, #4]
        ldr             r6, [in, #8]
        ldr             r7, [in, #12]
 
-       ldm             rk!, {r8-r11}
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
        __rev           r4, r4
        __rev           r5, r5
@@ -138,6 +148,25 @@
        eor             r7, r7, r11
 
        __adrl          ttab, \ttab
+       /*
+        * Disable interrupts and prefetch the 1024-byte 'ft' or 'it' table into
+        * L1 cache, assuming cacheline size >= 32.  This is a hardening measure
+        * intended to make cache-timing attacks more difficult.  They may not
+        * be fully prevented, however; see the paper
+        * https://cr.yp.to/antiforgery/cachetiming-20050414.pdf
+        * ("Cache-timing attacks on AES") for a discussion of the many
+        * difficulties involved in writing truly constant-time AES software.
+        */
+        save_and_disable_irqs  t0
+       .set            i, 0
+       .rept           1024 / 128
+       ldr             r8, [ttab, #i + 0]
+       ldr             r9, [ttab, #i + 32]
+       ldr             r10, [ttab, #i + 64]
+       ldr             r11, [ttab, #i + 96]
+       .set            i, i + 128
+       .endr
+       push            {t0}            // oldcpsr
 
        tst             rounds, #2
        bne             1f
@@ -151,8 +180,21 @@
        \round          r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, r10, r11
        b               0b
 
-2:     __adrl          ttab, \ltab
-       \round          r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, r10, r11, \bsz, b
+2:     .ifb            \ltab
+       add             ttab, ttab, #1
+       .else
+       __adrl          ttab, \ltab
+       // Prefetch inverse S-box for final round; see explanation above
+       .set            i, 0
+       .rept           256 / 64
+       ldr             t0, [ttab, #i + 0]
+       ldr             t1, [ttab, #i + 32]
+       .set            i, i + 64
+       .endr
+       .endif
+
+       pop             {rounds}        // oldcpsr
+       \round          r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, r10, r11, \bsz, b, rounds
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
        __rev           r4, r4
@@ -175,7 +217,7 @@
        .endm
 
 ENTRY(__aes_arm_encrypt)
-       do_crypt        fround, crypto_ft_tab, crypto_ft_tab + 1, 2
+       do_crypt        fround, crypto_ft_tab,, 2
 ENDPROC(__aes_arm_encrypt)
 
        .align          5
crypto/aes_generic.c +5 -5
index ca554d57d01e9..13df33aca4631 100644
@@ -63,7 +63,8 @@ static inline u8 byte(const u32 x, const unsigned n)
 
 static const u32 rco_tab[10] = { 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 27, 54 };
 
-__visible const u32 crypto_ft_tab[4][256] = {
+/* cacheline-aligned to facilitate prefetching into cache */
+__visible const u32 crypto_ft_tab[4][256] __cacheline_aligned = {
        {
                0xa56363c6, 0x847c7cf8, 0x997777ee, 0x8d7b7bf6,
                0x0df2f2ff, 0xbd6b6bd6, 0xb16f6fde, 0x54c5c591,
@@ -327,7 +328,7 @@ __visible const u32 crypto_ft_tab[4][256] = {
        }
 };
 
-__visible const u32 crypto_fl_tab[4][256] = {
+__visible const u32 crypto_fl_tab[4][256] __cacheline_aligned = {
        {
                0x00000063, 0x0000007c, 0x00000077, 0x0000007b,
                0x000000f2, 0x0000006b, 0x0000006f, 0x000000c5,
@@ -591,7 +592,7 @@ __visible const u32 crypto_fl_tab[4][256] = {
        }
 };
 
-__visible const u32 crypto_it_tab[4][256] = {
+__visible const u32 crypto_it_tab[4][256] __cacheline_aligned = {
        {
                0x50a7f451, 0x5365417e, 0xc3a4171a, 0x965e273a,
                0xcb6bab3b, 0xf1459d1f, 0xab58faac, 0x9303e34b,
@@ -855,7 +856,7 @@ __visible const u32 crypto_it_tab[4][256] = {
        }
 };
 
-__visible const u32 crypto_il_tab[4][256] = {
+__visible const u32 crypto_il_tab[4][256] __cacheline_aligned = {
        {
                0x00000052, 0x00000009, 0x0000006a, 0x000000d5,
                0x00000030, 0x00000036, 0x000000a5, 0x00000038,
--

2.19.1

#4 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] crypto: arm/aes - add some hardening against cache-timing attacks

Quoted 18 lines · Ard Biesheuvel
Quoted 11 lines · Eric Biggers

From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>

Make the ARM scalar AES implementation closer to constant-time by disabling interrupts and prefetching the tables into L1 cache. This is feasible because due to ARM's "free" rotations, the main tables are only 1024 bytes instead of the usual 4096 used by most AES implementations.

On ARM Cortex-A7, the speed loss is only about 5%. The resulting code is still over twice as fast as aes_ti.c. Responsiveness is potentially a concern, but interrupts are only disabled for a single AES block.

So that would be in the order of 700 cycles, based on the numbers you shared in v1 of the aes_ti.c patch. Does that sound about right? So that would be around 1 microsecond, which is really not a number to obsess about imo.

Quoted 8 lines

I considered another option, which is to detect whether an interrupt has been taken (by writing some canary value below that stack pointer in the location where the exception handler will preserve the value of sp, and checking at the end whether it has been modified) and doing a usleep_range(x, y) if that is the case.

But this is much simpler so let's only go there if we must.

I played around a bit and implemented it for discussion purposes, but restarting the operation if it gets interrupted, as suggested in the paper (whitespace corruption courtesy of Gmail)

(quoted diff) +0 -0

b/arch/arm/crypto/aes-cipher-core.S
index 184d6c2d15d5..2e8a84a47784 100644

arch/arm/crypto/aes-cipher-core.S +31 -0
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/linkage.h>
+#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
 #include <asm/cache.h>
 
  .text
@@ -139,6 +140,34 @@
 
  __adrl ttab, \ttab
 
+ /*
+ * Set a canary that will allow us to tell whether any
+ * interrupts were taken while this function was executing.
+ * The zero value will be overwritten with the process counter
+ * value at the point where the IRQ exception is taken.
+ */
+ mov t0, #0
+ str t0, [sp, #-(SVC_REGS_SIZE - S_PC)]
+
+ /*
+ * Prefetch the 1024-byte 'ft' or 'it' table into L1 cache,
+ * assuming cacheline size >= 32.  This is a hardening measure
+ * intended to make cache-timing attacks more difficult.
+ * They may not be fully prevented, however; see the paper
+ * https://cr.yp.to/antiforgery/cachetiming-20050414.pdf
+ * ("Cache-timing attacks on AES") for a discussion of the many
+ * difficulties involved in writing truly constant-time AES
+ * software.
+ */
+ .set i, 0
+ .rept 1024 / 128
+ ldr r8, [ttab, #i + 0]
+ ldr r9, [ttab, #i + 32]
+ ldr r10, [ttab, #i + 64]
+ ldr r11, [ttab, #i + 96]
+ .set i, i + 128
+ .endr
+
  tst rounds, #2
  bne 1f
 
@@ -154,6 +183,8 @@
 2: __adrl ttab, \ltab
  \round r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, r10, r11, \bsz, b
 
+ ldr r0, [sp, #-(SVC_REGS_SIZE - S_PC)] // check canary
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
  __rev r4, r4
  __rev r5, r5
(quoted diff) +0 -0

b/arch/arm/crypto/aes-cipher-glue.c
index c222f6e072ad..de8f32121511 100644

arch/arm/crypto/aes-cipher-glue.c +15 -4
@@ -11,28 +11,39 @@
 
 #include <crypto/aes.h>
 #include <linux/crypto.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 
-asmlinkage void __aes_arm_encrypt(u32 *rk, int rounds, const u8 *in, u8 *out);
+asmlinkage int __aes_arm_encrypt(u32 *rk, int rounds, const u8 *in, u8 *out);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__aes_arm_encrypt);
 
-asmlinkage void __aes_arm_decrypt(u32 *rk, int rounds, const u8 *in, u8 *out);
+asmlinkage int __aes_arm_decrypt(u32 *rk, int rounds, const u8 *in, u8 *out);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__aes_arm_decrypt);
 
 static void aes_encrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *out, const u8 *in)
 {
  struct crypto_aes_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
  int rounds = 6 + ctx->key_length / 4;
+ u8 buf[AES_BLOCK_SIZE];
 
- __aes_arm_encrypt(ctx->key_enc, rounds, in, out);
+ if (out == in)
+   in = memcpy(buf, in, AES_BLOCK_SIZE);
+
+ while (unlikely(__aes_arm_encrypt(ctx->key_enc, rounds, in, out)))
+   cpu_relax();
 }
 
 static void aes_decrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *out, const u8 *in)
 {
  struct crypto_aes_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
  int rounds = 6 + ctx->key_length / 4;
+ u8 buf[AES_BLOCK_SIZE];
+
+ if (out == in)
+   in = memcpy(buf, in, AES_BLOCK_SIZE);
 
- __aes_arm_decrypt(ctx->key_dec, rounds, in, out);
+ while (unlikely(__aes_arm_decrypt(ctx->key_dec, rounds, in, out)))
+   cpu_relax();
 }
 
 static struct crypto_alg aes_alg = {
#5 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] crypto: arm/aes - add some hardening against cache-timing attacks

Quoted 129 lines · Ard Biesheuvel
Quoted 18 lines · Ard Biesheuvel
Quoted 11 lines · Eric Biggers

From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>

Make the ARM scalar AES implementation closer to constant-time by disabling interrupts and prefetching the tables into L1 cache. This is feasible because due to ARM's "free" rotations, the main tables are only 1024 bytes instead of the usual 4096 used by most AES implementations.

On ARM Cortex-A7, the speed loss is only about 5%. The resulting code is still over twice as fast as aes_ti.c. Responsiveness is potentially a concern, but interrupts are only disabled for a single AES block.

So that would be in the order of 700 cycles, based on the numbers you shared in v1 of the aes_ti.c patch. Does that sound about right? So that would be around 1 microsecond, which is really not a number to obsess about imo.

Quoted 8 lines

I considered another option, which is to detect whether an interrupt has been taken (by writing some canary value below that stack pointer in the location where the exception handler will preserve the value of sp, and checking at the end whether it has been modified) and doing a usleep_range(x, y) if that is the case.

But this is much simpler so let's only go there if we must.

I played around a bit and implemented it for discussion purposes, but restarting the operation if it gets interrupted, as suggested in the paper (whitespace corruption courtesy of Gmail)

arch/arm/crypto/aes-cipher-core.S +31 -0
index 184d6c2d15d5..2e8a84a47784 100644
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/linkage.h>
+#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
 #include <asm/cache.h>
 
  .text
@@ -139,6 +140,34 @@
 
  __adrl ttab, \ttab
 
+ /*
+ * Set a canary that will allow us to tell whether any
+ * interrupts were taken while this function was executing.
+ * The zero value will be overwritten with the process counter
+ * value at the point where the IRQ exception is taken.
+ */
+ mov t0, #0
+ str t0, [sp, #-(SVC_REGS_SIZE - S_PC)]
+
+ /*
+ * Prefetch the 1024-byte 'ft' or 'it' table into L1 cache,
+ * assuming cacheline size >= 32.  This is a hardening measure
+ * intended to make cache-timing attacks more difficult.
+ * They may not be fully prevented, however; see the paper
+ * https://cr.yp.to/antiforgery/cachetiming-20050414.pdf
+ * ("Cache-timing attacks on AES") for a discussion of the many
+ * difficulties involved in writing truly constant-time AES
+ * software.
+ */
+ .set i, 0
+ .rept 1024 / 128
+ ldr r8, [ttab, #i + 0]
+ ldr r9, [ttab, #i + 32]
+ ldr r10, [ttab, #i + 64]
+ ldr r11, [ttab, #i + 96]
+ .set i, i + 128
+ .endr
+
  tst rounds, #2
  bne 1f
 
@@ -154,6 +183,8 @@
 2: __adrl ttab, \ltab
  \round r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, r10, r11, \bsz, b
 
+ ldr r0, [sp, #-(SVC_REGS_SIZE - S_PC)] // check canary
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
  __rev r4, r4
  __rev r5, r5
arch/arm/crypto/aes-cipher-glue.c +10 -3
index c222f6e072ad..de8f32121511 100644
@@ -11,28 +11,39 @@
 
 #include <crypto/aes.h>
 #include <linux/crypto.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 
-asmlinkage void __aes_arm_encrypt(u32 *rk, int rounds, const u8 *in, u8 *out);
+asmlinkage int __aes_arm_encrypt(u32 *rk, int rounds, const u8 *in, u8 *out);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__aes_arm_encrypt);
 
-asmlinkage void __aes_arm_decrypt(u32 *rk, int rounds, const u8 *in, u8 *out);
+asmlinkage int __aes_arm_decrypt(u32 *rk, int rounds, const u8 *in, u8 *out);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__aes_arm_decrypt);
 
 static void aes_encrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *out, const u8 *in)
 {
  struct crypto_aes_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
  int rounds = 6 + ctx->key_length / 4;
+ u8 buf[AES_BLOCK_SIZE];
 
- __aes_arm_encrypt(ctx->key_enc, rounds, in, out);
+ if (out == in)
+   in = memcpy(buf, in, AES_BLOCK_SIZE);
+
+ while (unlikely(__aes_arm_encrypt(ctx->key_enc, rounds, in, out)))
+   cpu_relax();
 }
 
 static void aes_decrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *out, const u8 *in)
 {
  struct crypto_aes_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
  int rounds = 6 + ctx->key_length / 4;
+ u8 buf[AES_BLOCK_SIZE];

arch/arm/crypto/aes-cipher-glue.c line 49

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/crypto/aes-cipher-glue.c +5 -1
+
+ if (out == in)
+   in = memcpy(buf, in, AES_BLOCK_SIZE);
 
- __aes_arm_decrypt(ctx->key_dec, rounds, in, out);
+ while (unlikely(__aes_arm_decrypt(ctx->key_dec, rounds, in, out)))
+   cpu_relax();
 }
 
 static struct crypto_alg aes_alg = {

It's an interesting idea, but the main thing I don't like about this is that the time it takes to do the encryption/decryption is unbounded, since it could get livelocked with a high rate of interrupts. To fix this you'd have to fall back to a truly constant-time implementation (e.g. implementing the S-box by simulating a hardware circuit) if the fast implementation gets interrupted too many times.

It's also less obviously correct since it relies on the canary reliably being overwritten by the interrupt handler, *and* being overwritten with a different value than it had before.

So as long as it doesn't cause problems in practice, I prefer the solution that just disables interrupts.

- Eric

#6 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] crypto: arm/aes - add some hardening against cache-timing attacks

Quoted 139 lines · Eric Biggers
Quoted 138 lines · Ard Biesheuvel
Quoted 18 lines · Ard Biesheuvel
Quoted 11 lines · Eric Biggers

From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>

Make the ARM scalar AES implementation closer to constant-time by disabling interrupts and prefetching the tables into L1 cache. This is feasible because due to ARM's "free" rotations, the main tables are only 1024 bytes instead of the usual 4096 used by most AES implementations.

On ARM Cortex-A7, the speed loss is only about 5%. The resulting code is still over twice as fast as aes_ti.c. Responsiveness is potentially a concern, but interrupts are only disabled for a single AES block.

So that would be in the order of 700 cycles, based on the numbers you shared in v1 of the aes_ti.c patch. Does that sound about right? So that would be around 1 microsecond, which is really not a number to obsess about imo.

Quoted 8 lines

I considered another option, which is to detect whether an interrupt has been taken (by writing some canary value below that stack pointer in the location where the exception handler will preserve the value of sp, and checking at the end whether it has been modified) and doing a usleep_range(x, y) if that is the case.

But this is much simpler so let's only go there if we must.

I played around a bit and implemented it for discussion purposes, but restarting the operation if it gets interrupted, as suggested in the paper (whitespace corruption courtesy of Gmail)

arch/arm/crypto/aes-cipher-core.S +31 -0
index 184d6c2d15d5..2e8a84a47784 100644
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/linkage.h>
+#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
 #include <asm/cache.h>
 
  .text
@@ -139,6 +140,34 @@
 
  __adrl ttab, \ttab
 
+ /*
+ * Set a canary that will allow us to tell whether any
+ * interrupts were taken while this function was executing.
+ * The zero value will be overwritten with the process counter
+ * value at the point where the IRQ exception is taken.
+ */
+ mov t0, #0
+ str t0, [sp, #-(SVC_REGS_SIZE - S_PC)]
+
+ /*
+ * Prefetch the 1024-byte 'ft' or 'it' table into L1 cache,
+ * assuming cacheline size >= 32.  This is a hardening measure
+ * intended to make cache-timing attacks more difficult.
+ * They may not be fully prevented, however; see the paper
+ * https://cr.yp.to/antiforgery/cachetiming-20050414.pdf
+ * ("Cache-timing attacks on AES") for a discussion of the many
+ * difficulties involved in writing truly constant-time AES
+ * software.
+ */
+ .set i, 0
+ .rept 1024 / 128
+ ldr r8, [ttab, #i + 0]
+ ldr r9, [ttab, #i + 32]
+ ldr r10, [ttab, #i + 64]
+ ldr r11, [ttab, #i + 96]
+ .set i, i + 128
+ .endr
+
  tst rounds, #2
  bne 1f
 
@@ -154,6 +183,8 @@
 2: __adrl ttab, \ltab
  \round r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r9, r10, r11, \bsz, b
 
+ ldr r0, [sp, #-(SVC_REGS_SIZE - S_PC)] // check canary
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
  __rev r4, r4
  __rev r5, r5
arch/arm/crypto/aes-cipher-glue.c +15 -4
index c222f6e072ad..de8f32121511 100644
@@ -11,28 +11,39 @@
 
 #include <crypto/aes.h>
 #include <linux/crypto.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 
-asmlinkage void __aes_arm_encrypt(u32 *rk, int rounds, const u8 *in, u8 *out);
+asmlinkage int __aes_arm_encrypt(u32 *rk, int rounds, const u8 *in, u8 *out);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__aes_arm_encrypt);
 
-asmlinkage void __aes_arm_decrypt(u32 *rk, int rounds, const u8 *in, u8 *out);
+asmlinkage int __aes_arm_decrypt(u32 *rk, int rounds, const u8 *in, u8 *out);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__aes_arm_decrypt);
 
 static void aes_encrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *out, const u8 *in)
 {
  struct crypto_aes_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
  int rounds = 6 + ctx->key_length / 4;
+ u8 buf[AES_BLOCK_SIZE];
 
- __aes_arm_encrypt(ctx->key_enc, rounds, in, out);
+ if (out == in)
+   in = memcpy(buf, in, AES_BLOCK_SIZE);
+
+ while (unlikely(__aes_arm_encrypt(ctx->key_enc, rounds, in, out)))
+   cpu_relax();
 }
 
 static void aes_decrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 *out, const u8 *in)
 {
  struct crypto_aes_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
  int rounds = 6 + ctx->key_length / 4;
+ u8 buf[AES_BLOCK_SIZE];
+
+ if (out == in)
+   in = memcpy(buf, in, AES_BLOCK_SIZE);
 
- __aes_arm_decrypt(ctx->key_dec, rounds, in, out);
+ while (unlikely(__aes_arm_decrypt(ctx->key_dec, rounds, in, out)))
+   cpu_relax();
 }
 
Quoted 9 lines

arch/arm/crypto/aes-cipher-glue.c line 49

Quoted 1 line
arch/arm/crypto/aes-cipher-glue.c +0 -0
 static struct crypto_alg aes_alg = {

It's an interesting idea, but the main thing I don't like about this is that the time it takes to do the encryption/decryption is unbounded, since it could get livelocked with a high rate of interrupts. To fix this you'd have to fall back to a truly constant-time implementation (e.g. implementing the S-box by simulating a hardware circuit) if the fast implementation gets interrupted too many times.

Yeah. I'm surprised that this is what the paper suggests, given that multiple interruptions only increase the time variance.

Quoted 4 lines

It's also less obviously correct since it relies on the canary reliably being overwritten by the interrupt handler, *and* being overwritten with a different value than it had before.

Indeed. That is why I am using the value of PC rather than SP (which was my original idea). In a previous approach, I did something like

ret = __aes_arm_encrypt(...);
if (unlikely(ret))
udelay((ret & 0xff) >> 2);

to insert an arbitrary delay in the range of 0 .. 63 microseconds, depending on where the interruption took place.

Quoted 3 lines

So as long as it doesn't cause problems in practice, I prefer the solution that just disables interrupts.

I agree, but I am anticipating some pushback, so we should make sure we have exhausted all other options.

#7 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] crypto: arm/aes - add some hardening against cache-timing attacks

In reply to Ard Biesheuvel
Quoted 13 lines · Ard Biesheuvel
Quoted 11 lines · Eric Biggers

From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>

Make the ARM scalar AES implementation closer to constant-time by disabling interrupts and prefetching the tables into L1 cache. This is feasible because due to ARM's "free" rotations, the main tables are only 1024 bytes instead of the usual 4096 used by most AES implementations.

On ARM Cortex-A7, the speed loss is only about 5%. The resulting code is still over twice as fast as aes_ti.c. Responsiveness is potentially a concern, but interrupts are only disabled for a single AES block.

Quoted 5 lines

So that would be in the order of 700 cycles, based on the numbers you shared in v1 of the aes_ti.c patch. Does that sound about right? So that would be around 1 microsecond, which is really not a number to obsess about imo.

Correct, on ARM Cortex-A7 I'm seeing slightly over 700 cycles per block encrypted or decrypted, including the prefetching.

- Eric

maintainer
#8 lore raw
In reply to Eric Biggers
Quoted 20 lines · Eric Biggers

This series makes the "aes-fixed-time" and "aes-arm" implementations of AES more resistant to cache-timing attacks.

Note that even after these changes, the implementations still aren't necessarily guaranteed to be constant-time; see
https://cr.yp.to/antiforgery/cachetiming-20050414.pdf for a discussion of the many difficulties involved in writing truly constant-time AES software. But it's valuable to make such attacks more difficult.

Changed since v2:
- In aes-arm, move the IRQ disable/enable into the assembly file.
- Other aes-arm tweaks.
- Add Kconfig help text.

Thanks to Ard Biesheuvel for the suggestions.

Eric Biggers (2):
crypto: aes_ti - disable interrupts while accessing S-box
crypto: arm/aes - add some hardening against cache-timing attacks

Quoted 6 lines
 arch/arm/crypto/Kconfig           |  9 +++++
 arch/arm/crypto/aes-cipher-core.S | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 crypto/Kconfig                    |  3 +-
 crypto/aes_generic.c              |  9 +++--
 crypto/aes_ti.c                   | 18 +++++++++
 5 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

All applied. Thanks.

Signature · 3 lines
Email: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt