genirq/matrix: Choose CPU for managed IRQs based on how many of them are allocated
PATCH v3 1/1 genirq/matrix: Choose CPU for managed IRQs based on how many of them are allocated
From: Long Li <[email protected]>
On a large system with multiple devices of the same class (e.g. NVMe disks, using managed IRQs), the kernel tends to concentrate their IRQs on several CPUs.
The issue is that when NVMe calls irq_matrix_alloc_managed(), the assigned CPU tends to be the first several CPUs in the cpumask, because they check for cpumap->available that will not change after managed IRQs are reserved.
For a managed IRQ, it tends to reserve more than one CPU, based on cpumask in irq_matrix_reserve_managed. But later when actually allocating CPU for this IRQ, only one CPU is allocated. Because "available" is calculated at the time managed IRQ is reserved, it tends to indicate a CPU has more IRQs than the actual number it's assigned.
To get a more even distribution for allocating managed IRQs, we need to keep track of how many of them are allocated on a given CPU. Introduce "managed_allocated" in struct cpumap to track those managed IRQs that are allocated on this CPU, and change the code to use this information for deciding how to allocate CPU for managed IRQs.
--- kernel/irq/matrix.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
kernel/irq/matrix.c +24 -1
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ struct cpumap {unsigned int available;unsigned int allocated;unsigned int managed; +unsigned int managed_allocated;bool initialized;bool online;unsigned long alloc_map[IRQ_MATRIX_SIZE ];
@@ -145,6 +146,27 @@ static unsigned int matrix_find_best_cpu(struct irq_matrix *m,return best_cpu; } +/* Find the best CPU which has the lowest number of managed IRQs allocated */ +static unsigned int matrix_find_best_cpu_managed (struct irq_matrix *m, +const struct cpumask *msk) +{ +unsigned int cpu, best_cpu, allocated =UINT_MAX ; +struct cpumap *cm; + + best_cpu =UINT_MAX ; + +for_each_cpu (cpu, msk) { + cm =per_cpu_ptr (m->maps, cpu); + +if (!cm->online || cm->managed_allocated > allocated) +continue ; + + best_cpu = cpu; + allocated = cm->managed_allocated; + } +return best_cpu; +} +/** * irq_matrix_assign_system - Assign system wide entry in the matrix * @m: Matrix pointer
@@ -269,7 +291,7 @@ int irq_matrix_alloc_managed(struct irq_matrix *m, const struct cpumask *msk,if (cpumask_empty (msk))return -EINVAL ; - cpu =matrix_find_best_cpu (m, msk); + cpu =matrix_find_best_cpu_managed (m, msk);if (cpu ==UINT_MAX )return -ENOSPC ;
@@ -282,6 +304,7 @@ int irq_matrix_alloc_managed(struct irq_matrix *m, const struct cpumask *msk,return -ENOSPC ;set_bit (bit, cm->alloc_map); cm->allocated++; + cm->managed_allocated++; m->total_allocated++; *mapped_cpu = cpu;trace_irq_matrix_alloc_managed (bit, cpu, m, cm);
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Long,
Quoted 13 lines · Long Li
/**
*irq_matrix_assign_system- Assign system wide entry in the matrix
* @m: Matrix pointerkernel/irq/matrix.c +1
-1@@ -269,7 +291,7 @@ int irq_matrix_alloc_managed(struct irq_matrix *m, const struct cpumask *msk,if (cpumask_empty (msk))return -EINVAL ; - cpu =matrix_find_best_cpu (m, msk); + cpu =matrix_find_best_cpu_managed (m, msk);if (cpu ==UINT_MAX )return -ENOSPC ;
kernel/irq/matrix.c int irq_matrix_alloc_managed(struct irq_matrix *m, const struct cpumask *msk, · line 310
Quoted 7 lines
kernel/irq/matrix.c +1
-0@@ -282,6 +304,7 @@ int irq_matrix_alloc_managed(struct irq_matrix *m, const struct cpumask *msk,return -ENOSPC ;set_bit (bit, cm->alloc_map); cm->allocated++; + cm->managed_allocated++; m->total_allocated++; *mapped_cpu = cpu;trace_irq_matrix_alloc_managed (bit, cpu, m, cm);
so far so good. But what exactly decrements managed_allocated ?
Thanks,
tglx
Quoted 13 lines · Thomas Gleixner
Quoted 12 lines · Long Li
/**
*irq_matrix_assign_system- Assign system wide entry in the matrix
* @m: Matrix pointerkernel/irq/matrix.c +1
-1@@ -269,7 +291,7 @@ int irq_matrix_alloc_managed(struct irq_matrix *m, const struct cpumask *msk,if (cpumask_empty (msk))return -EINVAL ; - cpu =matrix_find_best_cpu (m, msk); + cpu =matrix_find_best_cpu_managed (m, msk);if (cpu ==UINT_MAX )return -ENOSPC ;
Quoted 10 lines
kernel/irq/matrix.c int irq_matrix_alloc_managed(struct irq_matrix *m, const struct cpumask *msk, · line 310
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/irq/matrix.c +1
-0@@ -282,6 +304,7 @@ int irq_matrix_alloc_managed(struct irq_matrix *m, const struct cpumask *msk,return -ENOSPC ;set_bit (bit, cm->alloc_map); cm->allocated++; + cm->managed_allocated++; m->total_allocated++; *mapped_cpu = cpu;trace_irq_matrix_alloc_managed (bit, cpu, m, cm);so far so good. But what exactly decrements
managed_allocated?
Another thing. If we add that counter, then it would be good to expose it in the debugfs files as well.
Thanks,
tglx
Quoted 30 lines
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] genirq/matrix: Choose CPU for managed IRQs based on how many of them are allocated
Quoted 5 lines · Thomas Gleixner
Review int irq_matrix_alloc_managed(struct irq_matrix
Quoted 4 lines · Long Li
/**
*irq_matrix_assign_system- Assign system wide entry in the matrix
* @m: Matrix pointer(quoted diff) +0
-0@@ -269,7 +291,7 @@ int irq_matrix_alloc_managed(struct irq_matrix*m, const struct cpumask *msk,
Quoted 9 lines
kernel/irq/matrix.c int irq_matrix_alloc_managed(struct irq_matrix
Quoted 9 lines
kernel/irq/matrix.c +1
-1if (cpumask_empty (msk))return -EINVAL ; - cpu =matrix_find_best_cpu (m, msk); + cpu =matrix_find_best_cpu_managed (m, msk);if (cpu ==UINT_MAX )return -ENOSPC ;@@ -282,6 +304,7 @@ int irq_matrix_alloc_managed(struct irq_matrix*m, const struct cpumask *msk,
Quoted 9 lines
kernel/irq/matrix.c int irq_matrix_alloc_managed(struct irq_matrix *m, const struct cpumask *msk, · line 310
Quoted 7 lines
kernel/irq/matrix.c +1
-0return -ENOSPC ;set_bit (bit, cm->alloc_map); cm->allocated++; + cm->managed_allocated++; m->total_allocated++; *mapped_cpu = cpu;trace_irq_matrix_alloc_managed (bit, cpu, m, cm);so far so good. But what exactly decrements
managed_allocated?
Quoted 2 lines
Another thing. If we add that counter, then it would be good to expose it in the debugfs files as well.
I will send an update to address those.
Long
Quoted 4 lines
Thanks,
tglx