proc: fixup map_files test on arm
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 proc: fixup map_files test on arm
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3782
Turns out arm doesn't allow to map address 0, so try minimum virtual address instead.
---
tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c +7 -2
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@* ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF * OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. */ -/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with address 0. */ +/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with minimum address. */ #include <errno.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h>
@@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ static void fail(const char *fmt, unsigned long a, unsigned long b)int main (void ) {const unsigned int PAGE_SIZE =sysconf (_SC_PAGESIZE); +#ifdef __arm__ +unsigned long va =2 *PAGE_SIZE ; +#else +unsigned long va =0 ; +#endif void *p;int fd;unsigned long a, b;
@@ -55,7 +60,7 @@ int main(void)if (fd ==-1 )return 1 ; - p =mmap (NULL ,PAGE_SIZE ,PROT_NONE ,MAP_PRIVATE |MAP_FILE |MAP_FIXED , fd,0 ); + p =mmap (va,PAGE_SIZE ,PROT_NONE ,MAP_PRIVATE |MAP_FILE |MAP_FIXED , fd,0 );if (p ==MAP_FAILED ) {if (errno ==EPERM )return 2 ;
Including Shuah and kselftest list...
Quoted 38 lines · Alexey Dobriyan
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3782
Turns out arm doesn't allow to map address 0, so try minimum virtual address instead.
Reported-by Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco at linaro.org>Signed-off-by Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan at gmail.com>---
tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c +0
-0@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@* ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
* OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. */tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c +6
-1-/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with address 0. */ +/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with minimum address. */ #include <errno.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> @@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ static void fail(const char *fmt, unsigned long a, unsigned long b)int main (void ) {const unsigned int PAGE_SIZE =sysconf (_SC_PAGESIZE); +#ifdef __arm__ +unsigned long va =2 *PAGE_SIZE ; +#else +unsigned long va =0 ; +#endif void *p;int fd;tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c +0
-0unsigned long a, b;
tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c int main(void) · line 66
Quoted 8 lines
tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c +1
-1@@ -55,7 +60,7 @@ int main(void)if (fd ==-1 )return 1 ; - p =mmap (NULL ,PAGE_SIZE ,PROT_NONE ,MAP_PRIVATE |MAP_FILE |MAP_FIXED , fd,0 ); + p =mmap (va,PAGE_SIZE ,PROT_NONE ,MAP_PRIVATE |MAP_FILE |MAP_FIXED , fd,0 );if (p ==MAP_FAILED ) {if (errno ==EPERM )return 2 ;
I have sent a patch removing proc-self-map-files-002 AND making 001 to use as a HINT for mmap (MAP_FIXED) *at least* *(2 * PAGE_SIZE), which would, likely, attend all architectures, avoiding trying to make the test specific to one, and, still, test the symlinks for issues (like bad chars, spaces, so on).
Both tests (001 and 002) have pretty much the same code, while they could have 2 tests in a single code, using kselftest framework. Is NULL hint + MAP_FIXED something imperative for this test ? Why not to have all in a single test ? Are you keeping the NULL hint just to test mmap, apart" from the core of this test ?
Sorry to insist.. If you want to keep it like this, I can create a similar test in LTP - for the symlinks only, which seem important - and blacklist this one in our function tests kselftest list (https://lkft.linaro.org/), then no change is needed on your side.
Thanks
Quoted 44 lines · Rafael David Tinoco
Including Shuah and kselftest list...
Quoted 41 lines · Alexey Dobriyan
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3782
Turns out arm doesn't allow to map address 0, so try minimum virtual address instead.
Reported-by Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco at linaro.org>Signed-off-by Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan at gmail.com>---
tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c +0
-0@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@* ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
* OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. */tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c +6
-1-/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with address 0. */ +/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with minimum address. */ #include <errno.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> @@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ static void fail(const char *fmt, unsigned long a, unsigned long b)int main (void ) {const unsigned int PAGE_SIZE =sysconf (_SC_PAGESIZE); +#ifdef __arm__ +unsigned long va =2 *PAGE_SIZE ; +#else +unsigned long va =0 ; +#endif void *p;int fd;tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c +0
-0unsigned long a, b;@@ -55,7 +60,7 @@ int main(void)if (fd ==-1 )return 1 ;
Quoted 10 lines
tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c int main(void) · line 66
Quoted 5 lines
tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c +1
-1- p =mmap (NULL ,PAGE_SIZE ,PROT_NONE ,MAP_PRIVATE |MAP_FILE |MAP_FIXED , fd,0 ); + p =mmap (va,PAGE_SIZE ,PROT_NONE ,MAP_PRIVATE |MAP_FILE |MAP_FIXED , fd,0 );if (p ==MAP_FAILED ) {if (errno ==EPERM )return 2 ;I have sent a patch removing proc-self-map-files-002 AND making 001 to use as a HINT for mmap (
MAP_FIXED) *at least* *(2 *PAGE_SIZE), which would, likely, attend all architectures, avoiding trying to make the test specific to one, and, still, test the symlinks for issues (like bad chars, spaces, so on).
If the goal is to test the lowest address then going for 2*PAGE_SIZE is a mistake.
Which BTW hints to add a test for the highest address.
Quoted 3 lines
Both tests (001 and 002) have pretty much the same code, while they could have 2 tests in a single code, using kselftest framework. Is NULL hint +
MAP_FIXEDsomething imperative for this test ? Why not to have all in a single test ?
I dislike tests which lump everything together into one process.
Quoted 2 lines
Are you keeping the NULL hint just to test mmap, apart" from the core of this test ?
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 05:14:57PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
...
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
int main(void)
{tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c +5
-0const unsigned int PAGE_SIZE =sysconf (_SC_PAGESIZE); +#ifdef __arm__ +unsigned long va =2 *PAGE_SIZE ; +#else +unsigned long va =0 ; +#endif
...
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 5 lines
I have sent a patch removing proc-self-map-files-002 AND making 001 to use as a HINT for mmap (
MAP_FIXED) *at least* *(2 *PAGE_SIZE), which would, likely, attend all architectures, avoiding trying to make the test specific to one, and, still, test the symlinks for issues (like bad chars, spaces, so on).If the goal is to test the lowest address then going for 2*PAGE_SIZE is a mistake.
Quoted 10 lines
Which BTW hints to add a test for the highest address.
Quoted 3 lines
Both tests (001 and 002) have pretty much the same code, while they could have 2 tests in a single code, using kselftest framework. Is NULL hint +
MAP_FIXEDsomething imperative for this test ? Why not to have all in a single test ?I dislike tests which lump everything together into one process.
Quoted 2 lines
Are you keeping the NULL hint just to test mmap, apart" from the core of this test ?
Guys, lets simply stick with Alexey's patch. I personnally think that testing mappings should be a separate test in vm/, but seriously this took too long already :) If Alexey's patch fixes the problem with arm I think we're fine.
Rafael David Tinoco
Tested-byQuoted 28 lines · Cyrill Gorcunov
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 05:14:57PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
...Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
int main(void) { const unsigned int PAGE_SIZE = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c +5
-0+#ifdef __arm__ +unsigned long va =2 *PAGE_SIZE ; +#else +unsigned long va =0 ; +#endif ...
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 5 lines
I have sent a patch removing proc-self-map-files-002 AND making 001 to use as a HINT for mmap (
MAP_FIXED) *at least* *(2 *PAGE_SIZE), which would, likely, attend all architectures, avoiding trying to make the test specific to one, and, still, test the symlinks for issues (like bad chars, spaces, so on).If the goal is to test the lowest address then going for 2*PAGE_SIZE is a mistake.
Which BTW hints to add a test for the highest address.
Quoted 3 lines
Both tests (001 and 002) have pretty much the same code, while they could have 2 tests in a single code, using kselftest framework. Is NULL hint +
MAP_FIXEDsomething imperative for this test ? Why not to have all in a single test ?I dislike tests which lump everything together into one process.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Are you keeping the NULL hint just to test mmap, apart" from the core of this test ?
Guys, lets simply stick with Alexey's patch. I personnally think that testing mappings should be a separate test in vm/, but seriously this took too long already :) If Alexey's patch fixes the problem with arm I think we're fine.
Fine for me. It works in armhf.
Note: Maybe you should amend the patch and cast "va" in mmap() to avoid:
In file included from proc-self-map-files-002.c:7:/usr/include/arm-linux-gnueabihf/sys/mman.h:57:14: note: expected ‘void *’ but argument is of type ‘long unsigned int’
extern void *mmap (void *__addr, size_t __len, int __prot,
--
Rafael D. Tinoco
Linaro Kernel Validation
PATCH v2 1/1 proc: fixup map_files test on arm
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3782
Turns out arm doesn't allow to map address 0, so try minimum virtual address instead.
---
tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-self-map-files-002.c +7 -2
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@* ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF * OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. */ -/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with address 0. */ +/* Test readlink /proc/self/map_files/... with minimum address. */ #include <errno.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h>
@@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ static void fail(const char *fmt, unsigned long a, unsigned long b)int main (void ) {const unsigned int PAGE_SIZE =sysconf (_SC_PAGESIZE); +#ifdef __arm__ +unsigned long va =2 *PAGE_SIZE ; +#else +unsigned long va =0 ; +#endif void *p;int fd;unsigned long a, b;
@@ -55,7 +60,7 @@ int main(void)if (fd ==-1 )return 1 ; - p =mmap (NULL ,PAGE_SIZE ,PROT_NONE ,MAP_PRIVATE |MAP_FILE |MAP_FIXED , fd,0 ); + p =mmap ((void *)va,PAGE_SIZE ,PROT_NONE ,MAP_PRIVATE |MAP_FILE |MAP_FIXED , fd,0 );if (p ==MAP_FAILED ) {if (errno ==EPERM )return 2 ;
Quoted 8 lines · Alexey Dobriyan
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3782
Turns out arm doesn't allow to map address 0, so try minimum virtual address instead.
Reported-by Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco at linaro.org>Tested-by Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco at linaro.org>Signed-off-by Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan at gmail.com>
Thank you!