Skip to contentSkip to conversation

i2c-multi-instantiate: Adapt for INT3515 and alike

PATCH Superseded Andy Shevchenko 3 participants 25 messages Nov 20, 2018 – Nov 26, 2018

Subsystems (9)

v1 of 5 Superseded Latest is v5 →

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

cover i2c-multi-instantiate: Adapt for INT3515 and alike

Currently i2c-multi-instantiate driver does not support the case of INT3515 USB PD device, where:

- Interrupt() is used instead of GpioInt()
- All slaves may be the same from IP point of view
- There can be variadic amount of slaves

This series is addressing all above.

Notes:
- series has been smoke tested (Heikki would do BAT or more) on Coffee Lake system
- patch for BOSC0200 might be considered as RFC since the modalias potential issue

The idea is to push this either through PDx86 tree (needs Rafael's ACKs) or ACPI. In any case it needs tags from Heikki, Hans, Mika, Wolfram and Jonathan.

Testing and comments are warmly welcome.

Andy Shevchenko (15):
platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: Remove duplicate NULL check platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: Accept errors of

    i2c_acpi_new_device()
  platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Accept errors of
    i2c_acpi_new_device()

platform/x86: i2c-mutli-instantiate: Defer probe when no adapter found
i2c: acpi: Return error pointers from i2c_acpi_new_device()
i2c: acpi: Assign fwnode for devices created via i2c_acpi_new_device()
i2c: acpi: Use ACPI_FAILURE instead of !ACPI_SUCCESS
i2c: acpi: Introduce i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource() helper platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Count I2cSerialBus() resources platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Distinguish IRQ resource type platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Introduce IOAPIC IRQ support platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Allow to have same slaves ACPI / scan: Create platform device for INT3515 ACPI nodes ACPI / scan: Create platform device for BOSC0200 ACPI nodes
iio: inv_mpu6050: Use i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource() helper

 drivers/acpi/scan.c                          |  2 +
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c                  | 43 +++++----
 drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-i2c.c         |  1 -
 drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_acpi.c   | 16 ++--
 drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++----
 drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c     | 34 +++++--
 drivers/usb/typec/tps6598x.c                 |  8 +-
 include/linux/acpi.h                         | 11 +++
 8 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/15 platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: Remove duplicate NULL check

Since i2c_unregister_device() became NULL-aware we may remove duplicate NULL check.

---
 drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c +2 -4
index 464fe93657b5..431151d4e611 100644
@@ -213,8 +213,7 @@ static int cht_int33fe_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	i2c_unregister_device(data->fusb302);
 
 out_unregister_max17047:
-	if (data->max17047)
-		i2c_unregister_device(data->max17047);
+	i2c_unregister_device(data->max17047);
 
 	device_connections_remove(data->connections);
 
@@ -227,8 +226,7 @@ static int cht_int33fe_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	i2c_unregister_device(data->pi3usb30532);
 	i2c_unregister_device(data->fusb302);
-	if (data->max17047)
-		i2c_unregister_device(data->max17047);
+	i2c_unregister_device(data->max17047);
 
 	device_connections_remove(data->connections);
 
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
#2 lore raw

PATCH 2/15 platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: Accept errors of i2c_acpi_new_device()

In reply to Andy Shevchenko

In the future i2c_acpi_new_device() will return error pointer in some cases. Prepare i2c-multi-instantiate driver to support that.

---
 drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c +23 -5
index 431151d4e611..367d6e304ade 100644
@@ -168,8 +168,14 @@ static int cht_int33fe_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		board_info.dev_name = "max17047";
 		board_info.properties = max17047_props;
 		data->max17047 = i2c_acpi_new_device(dev, 1, &board_info);
-		if (!data->max17047)
-			return -EPROBE_DEFER; /* Wait for i2c-adapter to load */
+		if (IS_ERR(data->max17047))
+			ret = PTR_ERR(data->max17047);
+		else if (!data->max17047)
+			ret = -EPROBE_DEFER; /* Wait for i2c-adapter to load */
+		else
+			ret = 0;
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
 	}
 
 	data->connections[0].endpoint[0] = "port0";
@@ -194,7 +200,13 @@ static int cht_int33fe_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	board_info.irq = fusb302_irq;
 
 	data->fusb302 = i2c_acpi_new_device(dev, 2, &board_info);
-	if (!data->fusb302)
+	if (IS_ERR(data->fusb302))
+		ret = PTR_ERR(data->fusb302);
+	else if (!data->fusb302)
+		ret = -EPROBE_DEFER; /* Wait for the i2c-adapter to load */
+	else
+		ret = 0;
+	if (ret)
 		goto out_unregister_max17047;
 
 	memset(&board_info, 0, sizeof(board_info));
@@ -202,7 +214,13 @@ static int cht_int33fe_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	strlcpy(board_info.type, "pi3usb30532", I2C_NAME_SIZE);
 
 	data->pi3usb30532 = i2c_acpi_new_device(dev, 3, &board_info);
-	if (!data->pi3usb30532)
+	if (IS_ERR(data->pi3usb30532))
+		ret = PTR_ERR(data->pi3usb30532);
+	else if (!data->pi3usb30532)
+		ret = -EPROBE_DEFER; /* Wait for the i2c-adapter to load */
+	else
+		ret = 0;
+	if (ret)
 		goto out_unregister_fusb302;
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
@@ -217,7 +235,7 @@ static int cht_int33fe_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	device_connections_remove(data->connections);
 
-	return -EPROBE_DEFER; /* Wait for the i2c-adapter to load */
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int cht_int33fe_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
#3 lore raw

PATCH 3/15 platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Accept errors of i2c_acpi_new_device()

In reply to Andy Shevchenko

In the future i2c_acpi_new_device() will return error pointer in some cases. Prepare i2c-multi-instantiate driver to support that.

---
 drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c +7 -2
index 5456581b473c..e3345da82c84 100644
@@ -72,9 +72,14 @@ static int i2c_multi_inst_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			board_info.irq = ret;
 		}
 		multi->clients[i] = i2c_acpi_new_device(dev, i, &board_info);
-		if (!multi->clients[i]) {
-			dev_err(dev, "Error creating i2c-client, idx %d\n", i);
+		if (IS_ERR(multi->clients[i]))
+			ret = PTR_ERR(multi->clients[i]);
+		else if (!multi->clients[i])
 			ret = -ENODEV;
+		else
+			ret = 0;
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(dev, "Error creating i2c-client, idx %d\n", i);
 			goto error;
 		}
 	}
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
#4 lore raw

PATCH 4/15 platform/x86: i2c-mutli-instantiate: Defer probe when no adapter found

In reply to Andy Shevchenko

Likewise the rest of the i2c_acpi_new_device() users, defer the probe of the i2c-multi-intantiate driver in case adapter is not yet found.

---
 drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c +1 -1
index e3345da82c84..16a0eabe1e31 100644
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static int i2c_multi_inst_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		if (IS_ERR(multi->clients[i]))
 			ret = PTR_ERR(multi->clients[i]);
 		else if (!multi->clients[i])
-			ret = -ENODEV;
+			ret = -EPROBE_DEFER; /* Wait for i2c-adapter to load */
 		else
 			ret = 0;
 		if (ret) {
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
#5 lore raw

PATCH 5/15 i2c: acpi: Return error pointers from i2c_acpi_new_device()

In reply to Andy Shevchenko

The caller would like to know the reason why the i2c_acpi_new_device() fails. For example, if adapter is not available, it might be in the future and we would like to re-probe the clients again. But at the same time we would like to bail out if the error seems unrecoverable, such as out of memory condition. To achieve this, return error pointer in some cases.

---
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c +6 -3
index 32affd3fa8bd..af4b5bd5d973 100644
@@ -387,6 +387,7 @@ struct notifier_block i2c_acpi_notifier = {
  * Also see i2c_new_device, which this function calls to create the i2c-client.
  *
  * Returns a pointer to the new i2c-client, or NULL if the adapter is not found.
+ * In some cases might return an error pointer.
  */
 struct i2c_client *i2c_acpi_new_device(struct device *dev, int index,
 				       struct i2c_board_info *info)
@@ -399,7 +400,7 @@ struct i2c_client *i2c_acpi_new_device(struct device *dev, int index,
 
 	adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
 	if (!adev)
-		return NULL;
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
 
 	memset(&lookup, 0, sizeof(lookup));
 	lookup.info = info;
@@ -409,9 +410,11 @@ struct i2c_client *i2c_acpi_new_device(struct device *dev, int index,
 	ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &resource_list,
 				     i2c_acpi_fill_info, &lookup);
 	acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 
-	if (ret < 0 || !info->addr)
-		return NULL;
+	if (!info->addr)
+		return ERR_PTR(-EADDRNOTAVAIL);
 
 	adapter = i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle(lookup.adapter_handle);
 	if (!adapter)
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
#6 lore raw

PATCH 6/15 i2c: acpi: Assign fwnode for devices created via i2c_acpi_new_device()

In reply to Andy Shevchenko

i2c_acpi_new_device() doesn't assign fwnode like it's done, for example, in i2c_acpi_register_devices() path.

Assign fwnode in i2c_acpi_new_device() as it's done elsewhere.

---
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c +1 -0
index af4b5bd5d973..478862abb82a 100644
@@ -420,6 +420,7 @@ struct i2c_client *i2c_acpi_new_device(struct device *dev, int index,
 	if (!adapter)
 		return NULL;
 
+	info->fwnode = acpi_fwnode_handle(adev);
 	return i2c_new_device(adapter, info);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_acpi_new_device);
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
#7 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v1 06/15] i2c: acpi: Assign fwnode for devices created via i2c_acpi_new_device()

Hi,

Quoted 6 lines · Andy Shevchenko

i2c_acpi_new_device() doesn't assign fwnode like it's done, for example, in i2c_acpi_register_devices() path.

Assign fwnode in i2c_acpi_new_device() as it's done elsewhere.

As already mentioned in my reply to the cover letter, a NACK from me for this one.

The problem is that this causes the fwnode to be shared by all the "struct device"-s (embedded in the i2c-clients created).

This in itself is not necessarily a problem, but it does become a problem when combined with using device_add_properties as intel_cht_int33fe.c does.

Since the info in the ACPI tables for devices which use this driver is pretty terrible, we add a bunch of properties to notify the drivers about how the different parts which make up the Type-C functionality are tied together.

device_add_properties creates a new fwnode and then calls set_secondary_fwnode. For devices which already have a fwnode assigned (which the i2c-clients will have after this patch) set_secondary_fwnode sets dev->fwnode->secondary to the fwnode which has been newly created to hold the added properties.

Since all i2c-clients instantiated now share dev->fwnode, the result of this is that all i2c-clients created now will have the properties of the last i2c-client instantiated for an acpi-node which describes multiple clients in a single node.

Also the fwnodes created for the properties of earlier instantiated i2c-clients will be leaked.

I see 2 possible solutions here:

1) Changing this patch so that i2c_acpi_new_device() does:

        /*
         * The fwnode can not be shared between instantiated clients when
         * adding device-properties to the instantiated client.
         */
	if (!info->properties)
		info->fwnode = acpi_fwnode_handle(adev);

2) Leave whether info->fwnode should be set or not up to the caller of i2c_acpi_new_device() (info is already passed in as a param). E.g. i2c-multi-instantiate.c could do this (for now, maybe in the future we will also want to add properties for some HIDs).

I think that 1. is the best solution and this is all kernel internal, so we can always revisit this if necessary.

Regards,

Hans

Quoted 17 lines
---
  drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c +1 -0
index af4b5bd5d973..478862abb82a 100644
@@ -420,6 +420,7 @@ struct i2c_client *i2c_acpi_new_device(struct device *dev, int index,
  	if (!adapter)
  		return NULL;
 
+	info->fwnode = acpi_fwnode_handle(adev);
  	return i2c_new_device(adapter, info);
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_acpi_new_device);
#8 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v1 06/15] i2c: acpi: Assign fwnode for devices created via i2c_acpi_new_device()

Quoted 27 lines · Hans de Goede
Quoted 4 lines · Andy Shevchenko

i2c_acpi_new_device() doesn't assign fwnode like it's done, for example, in i2c_acpi_register_devices() path.

Assign fwnode in i2c_acpi_new_device() as it's done elsewhere.

As already mentioned in my reply to the cover letter, a NACK from me for this one.

The problem is that this causes the fwnode to be shared by all the "struct device"-s (embedded in the i2c-clients created).

This in itself is not necessarily a problem, but it does become a problem when combined with using device_add_properties as intel_cht_int33fe.c does.

Since the info in the ACPI tables for devices which use this driver is pretty terrible, we add a bunch of properties to notify the drivers about how the different parts which make up the Type-C functionality are tied together.

device_add_properties creates a new fwnode and then calls set_secondary_fwnode. For devices which already have a fwnode assigned (which the i2c-clients will have after this patch) set_secondary_fwnode sets dev->fwnode->secondary to the fwnode which has been newly created to hold the added properties.

Quoted 8 lines

Since all i2c-clients instantiated now share dev->fwnode, the result of this is that all i2c-clients created now will have the properties of the last i2c-client instantiated for an acpi-node which describes multiple clients in a single node.

Also the fwnodes created for the properties of earlier instantiated i2c-clients will be leaked.

Thanks for this very detailed problem report.

Quoted 12 lines

I see 2 possible solutions here:

1) Changing this patch so that i2c_acpi_new_device() does:

        /*
         * The fwnode can not be shared between instantiated clients when
         * adding device-properties to the instantiated client.
         */
	if (!info->properties)
		info->fwnode = acpi_fwnode_handle(adev);
Quoted 8 lines

2) Leave whether info->fwnode should be set or not up to the caller of i2c_acpi_new_device() (info is already passed in as a param). E.g. i2c-multi-instantiate.c could do this (for now, maybe in the future we will also want to add properties for some HIDs).

I think that 1. is the best solution and this is all kernel internal, so we can always revisit this if necessary.

Heikki told me he has some ideas, but for now I will drop this patch.

Signature · 2 lines
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
maintainer
#9 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v1 06/15] i2c: acpi: Assign fwnode for devices created via i2c_acpi_new_device()

Hi guys,

Quoted 19 lines · Andy Shevchenko
Quoted 17 lines · Hans de Goede

I see 2 possible solutions here:

1) Changing this patch so that i2c_acpi_new_device() does:

        /*
         * The fwnode can not be shared between instantiated clients when
         * adding device-properties to the instantiated client.
         */
	if (!info->properties)
		info->fwnode = acpi_fwnode_handle(adev);

2) Leave whether info->fwnode should be set or not up to the caller of i2c_acpi_new_device() (info is already passed in as a param). E.g. i2c-multi-instantiate.c could do this (for now, maybe in the future we will also want to add properties for some HIDs).

Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines

I think that 1. is the best solution and this is all kernel internal, so we can always revisit this if necessary.

Heikki told me he has some ideas, but for now I will drop this patch.

I think the only thing that we can do is to assign the ACPI node as the secondary node to this kind of mfd "cells". It would most likely require some changes to the apci code in Linux kernel, probable nothing major, but no driver needs this for now (I think), so we don't need to worry about it right now.

thanks,

Signature · 1 line
heikki
#10 lore raw

PATCH 7/15 i2c: acpi: Use ACPI_FAILURE instead of !ACPI_SUCCESS

In reply to Andy Shevchenko

Convert to use ACPI_FAILURE instead of !ACPI_SUCCESS.

---
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c +1 -1
index 478862abb82a..99553b1469b4 100644
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static int i2c_acpi_fill_info(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
 	status = acpi_get_handle(lookup->device_handle,
 				 sb->resource_source.string_ptr,
 				 &lookup->adapter_handle);
-	if (!ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
 		return 1;
 
 	info->addr = sb->slave_address;
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
#11 lore raw

PATCH 8/15 i2c: acpi: Introduce i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource() helper

In reply to Andy Shevchenko

Besides current two users one more is coming. Definitely makes sense to introduce a helper.

No functional change intended.

---
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
 include/linux/acpi.h        | 11 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c +19 -12
index 99553b1469b4..59b8b191d752 100644
@@ -45,6 +45,23 @@ struct i2c_acpi_lookup {
 	u32 min_speed;
 };
 
+bool i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares,
+			       struct acpi_resource_i2c_serialbus **i2c)
+{
+	struct acpi_resource_i2c_serialbus *sb;
+
+	if (ares->type != ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_SERIAL_BUS)
+		return false;
+
+	sb = &ares->data.i2c_serial_bus;
+	if (sb->type != ACPI_RESOURCE_SERIAL_TYPE_I2C)
+		return false;
+
+	*i2c = sb;
+	return true;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource);
+
 static int i2c_acpi_fill_info(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
 {
 	struct i2c_acpi_lookup *lookup = data;
@@ -52,11 +69,7 @@ static int i2c_acpi_fill_info(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
 	struct acpi_resource_i2c_serialbus *sb;
 	acpi_status status;
 
-	if (info->addr || ares->type != ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_SERIAL_BUS)
-		return 1;
-
-	sb = &ares->data.i2c_serial_bus;
-	if (sb->type != ACPI_RESOURCE_SERIAL_TYPE_I2C)
+	if (info->addr || !i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource(ares, &sb))
 		return 1;
 
 	if (lookup->index != -1 && lookup->n++ != lookup->index)
@@ -529,13 +542,7 @@ i2c_acpi_space_handler(u32 function, acpi_physical_address command,
 		goto err;
 	}
 
-	if (!value64 || ares->type != ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_SERIAL_BUS) {
-		ret = AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
-		goto err;
-	}
-
-	sb = &ares->data.i2c_serial_bus;
-	if (sb->type != ACPI_RESOURCE_SERIAL_TYPE_I2C) {
+	if (!value64 || !i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource(ares, &sb)) {
 		ret = AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
 		goto err;
 	}
include/linux/acpi.h +11 -0
index ed80f147bd50..6afc6e3c4c5c 100644
@@ -1054,6 +1054,17 @@ static inline int acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(struct acpi_device *adev, int index)
 }
 #endif
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C)
+bool i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares,
+			       struct acpi_resource_i2c_serialbus **i2c);
+#else
+static inline bool i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares,
+					     struct acpi_resource_i2c_serialbus **i2c)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+#endif
+
 /* Device properties */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
#12 lore raw

PATCH 9/15 platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Count I2cSerialBus() resources

In reply to Andy Shevchenko

Instead of relying on hard coded and thus expected number of I2C clients, count the real amount provided by firmware.

This allows to support non-fixed amount of the slaves.

---
 drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c +31 -3
index 16a0eabe1e31..d17686e10d08 100644
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
 
 struct i2c_inst_data {
 	const char *type;
@@ -23,6 +24,31 @@ struct i2c_multi_inst_data {
 	struct i2c_client *clients[0];
 };
 
+static int i2c_multi_inst_count(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
+{
+	struct acpi_resource_i2c_serialbus *sb;
+	int *count = data;
+
+	if (i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource(ares, &sb))
+		*count = *count + 1;
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
+static int i2c_multi_inst_count_resources(struct acpi_device *adev)
+{
+	LIST_HEAD(r);
+	int count = 0;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &r, i2c_multi_inst_count, &count);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&r);
+	return count;
+}
+
 static int i2c_multi_inst_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct i2c_multi_inst_data *multi;
@@ -44,15 +70,17 @@ static int i2c_multi_inst_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
 
 	/* Count number of clients to instantiate */
-	for (i = 0; inst_data[i].type; i++) {}
+	ret = i2c_multi_inst_count_resources(adev);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
 
 	multi = devm_kmalloc(dev,
-			offsetof(struct i2c_multi_inst_data, clients[i]),
+			offsetof(struct i2c_multi_inst_data, clients[ret]),
 			GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!multi)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	multi->num_clients = i;
+	multi->num_clients = ret;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < multi->num_clients; i++) {
 		memset(&board_info, 0, sizeof(board_info));
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
#13 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v1 09/15] platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Count I2cSerialBus() resources

Hi,

Quoted 65 lines · Andy Shevchenko

Instead of relying on hard coded and thus expected number of I2C clients, count the real amount provided by firmware.

This allows to support non-fixed amount of the slaves.

---
  drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++--
  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c +29 -2
index 16a0eabe1e31..d17686e10d08 100644
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
  #include <linux/kernel.h>
  #include <linux/module.h>
  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
 
  struct i2c_inst_data {
  	const char *type;
@@ -23,6 +24,31 @@ struct i2c_multi_inst_data {
  	struct i2c_client *clients[0];
  };
 
+static int i2c_multi_inst_count(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
+{
+	struct acpi_resource_i2c_serialbus *sb;
+	int *count = data;
+
+	if (i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource(ares, &sb))
+		*count = *count + 1;
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
+static int i2c_multi_inst_count_resources(struct acpi_device *adev)
+{
+	LIST_HEAD(r);
+	int count = 0;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &r, i2c_multi_inst_count, &count);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&r);
+	return count;
+}
+
  static int i2c_multi_inst_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  {
  	struct i2c_multi_inst_data *multi;
@@ -44,15 +70,17 @@ static int i2c_multi_inst_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  	adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
 
  	/* Count number of clients to instantiate */
-	for (i = 0; inst_data[i].type; i++) {}
+	ret = i2c_multi_inst_count_resources(adev);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
 
  	multi = devm_kmalloc(dev,
-			offsetof(struct i2c_multi_inst_data, clients[i]),

drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c static int i2c_multi_inst_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) · line 86

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c +2 -1
+			offsetof(struct i2c_multi_inst_data, clients[ret]),
  			GFP_KERNEL);
  	if (!multi)
  		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	multi->num_clients = i;
+	multi->num_clients = ret;
 
  	for (i = 0; i < multi->num_clients; i++) {
  		memset(&board_info, 0, sizeof(board_info));

Now you end up indexing inst_data with i without checking that inst_data holds enough data. Not using all of inst_data in case there are less I2cSerialBus resources then inst_data entries is fine. But you need to deal with the case when there are more I2cSerialBus resources then inst_data entries, either by erroring out or ignoring the extra I2cSerialBus resources.

Also it might be better to make the i2c_multi_inst_count_resources() function a generic helper under drivers/acpi, so that it can be used in other places, see my comments to the BOSC0200 patch.

Regards,

Hans

#14 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v1 09/15] platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Count I2cSerialBus() resources

Quoted 12 lines · Hans de Goede

drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c static int i2c_multi_inst_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) · line 86

Quoted 4 lines · Andy Shevchenko
drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c +1 -1
-	multi->num_clients = i;
+	multi->num_clients = ret;
  	for (i = 0; i < multi->num_clients; i++) {
  		memset(&board_info, 0, sizeof(board_info));

Now you end up indexing inst_data with i without checking that inst_data holds enough data. Not using all of inst_data in case there are less I2cSerialBus resources then inst_data entries is fine. But you need to deal with the case when there are more I2cSerialBus resources then inst_data entries, either by erroring out or ignoring the extra I2cSerialBus resources.

I think returning an error here is to be on safer side.

Quoted 3 lines

Also it might be better to make the i2c_multi_inst_count_resources() function a generic helper under drivers/acpi, so that it can be used in other places, see my comments to the BOSC0200 patch.

I would rather to avoid touching BOSC0200 right now and keep that function inside i2c-multi-instantiate.

Signature · 2 lines
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
#15 lore raw

PATCH 10/15 platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Distinguish IRQ resource type

In reply to Andy Shevchenko

As a preparatory patch switch the driver to distinguish IRQ resource type. For now, only GpioInt() is supported.

---
 drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c | 27 +++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c +18 -9
index d17686e10d08..336ef28e072d 100644
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/acpi.h>
+#include <linux/bits.h>
 #include <linux/i2c.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
@@ -14,9 +15,14 @@
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/types.h>
 
+#define IRQ_RESOURCE_TYPE	GENMASK(1, 0)
+#define IRQ_RESOURCE_NONE	0
+#define IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO	1
+
 struct i2c_inst_data {
 	const char *type;
-	int gpio_irq_idx;
+	unsigned int flags;
+	int irq_idx;
 };
 
 struct i2c_multi_inst_data {
@@ -88,16 +94,19 @@ static int i2c_multi_inst_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s-%s", match->id,
 			 inst_data[i].type);
 		board_info.dev_name = name;
-		board_info.irq = 0;
-		if (inst_data[i].gpio_irq_idx != -1) {
-			ret = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(adev,
-						    inst_data[i].gpio_irq_idx);
+		switch (inst_data[i].flags & IRQ_RESOURCE_TYPE) {
+		case IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO:
+			ret = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(adev, inst_data[i].irq_idx);
 			if (ret < 0) {
 				dev_err(dev, "Error requesting irq at index %d: %d\n",
-					inst_data[i].gpio_irq_idx, ret);
+					inst_data[i].irq_idx, ret);
 				goto error;
 			}
 			board_info.irq = ret;
+			break;
+		default:
+			board_info.irq = 0;
+			break;
 		}
 		multi->clients[i] = i2c_acpi_new_device(dev, i, &board_info);
 		if (IS_ERR(multi->clients[i]))
@@ -134,9 +143,9 @@ static int i2c_multi_inst_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 }
 
 static const struct i2c_inst_data bsg1160_data[]  = {
-	{ "bmc150_accel", 0 },
-	{ "bmc150_magn", -1 },
-	{ "bmg160", -1 },
+	{ "bmc150_accel", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },
+	{ "bmc150_magn" },
+	{ "bmg160" },
 	{}
 };
 
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
#16 lore raw

PATCH 11/15 platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Introduce IOAPIC IRQ support

In reply to Andy Shevchenko

If ACPI table provides an Interrupt() resource we may consider to use it instead of GpioInt() one.

Here we leave an error condition, when getting IRQ resource, to the driver to decide how to proceed, because some drivers may consider IRQ resource optional.

---
 drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c +9 -0
index 336ef28e072d..3334fafb4d8c 100644
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 #define IRQ_RESOURCE_TYPE	GENMASK(1, 0)
 #define IRQ_RESOURCE_NONE	0
 #define IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO	1
+#define IRQ_RESOURCE_APIC	2
 
 struct i2c_inst_data {
 	const char *type;
@@ -104,6 +105,14 @@ static int i2c_multi_inst_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			}
 			board_info.irq = ret;
 			break;
+		case IRQ_RESOURCE_APIC:
+			ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, inst_data[i].irq_idx);
+			if (ret < 0) {
+				dev_dbg(dev, "Error requesting irq at index %d: %d\n",
+					inst_data[i].irq_idx, ret);
+			}
+			board_info.irq = ret;
+			break;
 		default:
 			board_info.irq = 0;
 			break;
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
#17 lore raw

PATCH 12/15 platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Allow to have same slaves

In reply to Andy Shevchenko

Currently the driver will not enumerate the devices where I2C slaves are of the same type.

Add an instance number to make them unique.

---
 drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c +2 -2
index 3334fafb4d8c..1e078a961245 100644
@@ -92,8 +92,8 @@ static int i2c_multi_inst_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	for (i = 0; i < multi->num_clients; i++) {
 		memset(&board_info, 0, sizeof(board_info));
 		strlcpy(board_info.type, inst_data[i].type, I2C_NAME_SIZE);
-		snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s-%s", match->id,
-			 inst_data[i].type);
+		snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s-%s.%d", match->id,
+			 inst_data[i].type, i);
 		board_info.dev_name = name;
 		switch (inst_data[i].flags & IRQ_RESOURCE_TYPE) {
 		case IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO:
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
#18 lore raw

PATCH 13/15 ACPI / scan: Create platform device for INT3515 ACPI nodes

In reply to Andy Shevchenko

The ACPI device with INT3515 _HID is representing a complex USB PD hardware infrastructure which includes several I2C slave ICs.

We add an ID to the I2C multi instantiate list to enumerate all I2C slaves correctly.

---
 drivers/acpi/scan.c                          | 1 +
 drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c | 9 +++++++++
 drivers/usb/typec/tps6598x.c                 | 8 ++++----
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
drivers/acpi/scan.c +1 -0
index bd1c59fb0e17..e9eda5558c1f 100644
@@ -1541,6 +1541,7 @@ static bool acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent(struct acpi_device *device)
 	static const struct acpi_device_id i2c_multi_instantiate_ids[] = {
 		{"BSG1160", },
 		{"INT33FE", },
+		{"INT3515", },
 		{}
 	};
 
drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c +9 -0
index 1e078a961245..efaf34cbbc7b 100644
@@ -158,12 +158,21 @@ static const struct i2c_inst_data bsg1160_data[]  = {
 	{}
 };
 
+static const struct i2c_inst_data int3515_data[]  = {
+	{ "tps6598x", IRQ_RESOURCE_APIC, 0 },
+	{ "tps6598x", IRQ_RESOURCE_APIC, 1 },
+	{ "tps6598x", IRQ_RESOURCE_APIC, 2 },
+	{ "tps6598x", IRQ_RESOURCE_APIC, 3 },
+	{}
+};
+
 /*
  * Note new device-ids must also be added to i2c_multi_instantiate_ids in
  * drivers/acpi/scan.c: acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent().
  */
 static const struct acpi_device_id i2c_multi_inst_acpi_ids[] = {
 	{ "BSG1160", (unsigned long)bsg1160_data },
+	{ "INT3515", (unsigned long)int3515_data },
 	{ }
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, i2c_multi_inst_acpi_ids);
drivers/usb/typec/tps6598x.c +4 -4
index c84c8c189e90..1c0033ad8738 100644
@@ -501,19 +501,19 @@ static int tps6598x_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static const struct acpi_device_id tps6598x_acpi_match[] = {
-	{ "INT3515", 0 },
+static const struct i2c_device_id tps6598x_id[] = {
+	{ "tps6598x" },
 	{ }
 };
-MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, tps6598x_acpi_match);
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, tps6598x_id);
 
 static struct i2c_driver tps6598x_i2c_driver = {
 	.driver = {
 		.name = "tps6598x",
-		.acpi_match_table = tps6598x_acpi_match,
 	},
 	.probe_new = tps6598x_probe,
 	.remove = tps6598x_remove,
+	.id_table = tps6598x_id,
 };
 module_i2c_driver(tps6598x_i2c_driver);
 
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
#19 lore raw

PATCH 14/15 ACPI / scan: Create platform device for BOSC0200 ACPI nodes

In reply to Andy Shevchenko

On some laptops the ACPI device with BOSC0200 _HID is representing two accelerometers under one node.

We add an ID to the I2C multi instantiate list to enumerate all I2C slaves correctly.

For reference here is the relevant DSDT blurb from the Yoga 11e:

Device (ACC)

{
	Name (_ADR, Zero)  // _ADR: Address
	Name (_HID, "BOSC0200")  // _HID: Hardware ID
	Name (_CID, "BOSC0200")  // _CID: Compatible ID
	Name (_DDN, "Accelerometer")  // _DDN: DOS Device Name
	Name (_UID, One)  // _UID: Unique ID
	Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized)  // _CRS: Current Resource Settings
	{
		Name (RBUF, ResourceTemplate ()
		{
			I2cSerialBusV2 (0x0019, ControllerInitiated, 0x00061A80,
				AddressingMode7Bit, "\\_SB.PCI0.I2C3",
				0x00, ResourceConsumer, , Exclusive,
			)
			I2cSerialBusV2 (0x0018, ControllerInitiated, 0x00061A80,
				AddressingMode7Bit, "\\_SB.PCI0.I2C3",
				0x00, ResourceConsumer, , Exclusive,
			)
		})
		Return (RBUF) /* \_SB_.PCI0.I2C3.ACC_._CRS.RBUF */
	}
---
 drivers/acpi/scan.c                          | 1 +
 drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-i2c.c         | 1 -
 drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c | 7 +++++++
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/acpi/scan.c +1 -0
index e9eda5558c1f..e46c877fa9f1 100644
@@ -1539,6 +1539,7 @@ static bool acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent(struct acpi_device *device)
 	 * which i2c_device_id to use for each resource.
 	 */
 	static const struct acpi_device_id i2c_multi_instantiate_ids[] = {
+		{"BOSC0200", },
 		{"BSG1160", },
 		{"INT33FE", },
 		{"INT3515", },
drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-i2c.c +0 -1
index 8ffc308d5fd0..9d22a4d9d568 100644
@@ -64,7 +64,6 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id bmc150_accel_acpi_match[] = {
 	{"BMA250E",	bma250e},
 	{"BMA222E",	bma222e},
 	{"BMA0280",	bma280},
-	{"BOSC0200"},
 	{ },
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, bmc150_accel_acpi_match);
drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c +7 -0
index efaf34cbbc7b..c90137d30a98 100644
@@ -151,6 +151,12 @@ static int i2c_multi_inst_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static const struct i2c_inst_data bosc0200_data[]  = {
+	{ "bmc150_accel" },
+	{ "bmc150_accel" },
+	{}
+};
+
 static const struct i2c_inst_data bsg1160_data[]  = {
 	{ "bmc150_accel", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },
 	{ "bmc150_magn" },
@@ -171,6 +177,7 @@ static const struct i2c_inst_data int3515_data[]  = {
  * drivers/acpi/scan.c: acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent().
  */
 static const struct acpi_device_id i2c_multi_inst_acpi_ids[] = {
+	{ "BOSC0200", (unsigned long)bosc0200_data },
 	{ "BSG1160", (unsigned long)bsg1160_data },
 	{ "INT3515", (unsigned long)int3515_data },
 	{ }
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
#20 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v1 14/15] ACPI / scan: Create platform device for BOSC0200 ACPI nodes

HI,

Quoted 31 lines · Andy Shevchenko

On some laptops the ACPI device with BOSC0200 _HID is representing two accelerometers under one node.

We add an ID to the I2C multi instantiate list to enumerate all I2C slaves correctly.

For reference here is the relevant DSDT blurb from the Yoga 11e:

Device (ACC)

{
	Name (_ADR, Zero)  // _ADR: Address
	Name (_HID, "BOSC0200")  // _HID: Hardware ID
	Name (_CID, "BOSC0200")  // _CID: Compatible ID
	Name (_DDN, "Accelerometer")  // _DDN: DOS Device Name
	Name (_UID, One)  // _UID: Unique ID
	Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized)  // _CRS: Current Resource Settings
	{
		Name (RBUF, ResourceTemplate ()
		{
			I2cSerialBusV2 (0x0019, ControllerInitiated, 0x00061A80,
				AddressingMode7Bit, "\\_SB.PCI0.I2C3",
				0x00, ResourceConsumer, , Exclusive,
			)
			I2cSerialBusV2 (0x0018, ControllerInitiated, 0x00061A80,
				AddressingMode7Bit, "\\_SB.PCI0.I2C3",
				0x00, ResourceConsumer, , Exclusive,
			)
		})
		Return (RBUF) /* \_SB_.PCI0.I2C3.ACC_._CRS.RBUF */
	}
Quoted 3 lines

So as already discussed switching all devices which define a BOSC0200 device in their ACPI tables to using i2c-multi-instantiate.c will break the orientation quirks in udev's hwdb since those go by the modalias and this will change the modalias from acpi:BOSC0200:BOSC0200 to i2c:bmc150_accel

After our last discussion I've been thinking about this and I think the best solution is something like this in drivers/acpi/scan.c:

#define I2C_MULTI_INST_FORCE 0x01

        static const struct acpi_device_id i2c_multi_instantiate_ids[] = {
                {"BOSC0200", },
                {"BSG1160", },
                {"INT33FE", I2C_MULTI_INST_FORCE},
                {"INT3515", },
                {}
        };
	const struct acpi_device_id *id = NULL;

        ...

	/* Instantiate a pdev for the i2c-multi-instantiate drv to bind to? */
	__acpi_match_device(device, i2c_multi_instantiate_ids, NULL, &id, NULL);
	if (id) {
		if (id->driver_data & I2C_MULTI_INST_FORCE)
			return false;

                count = i2c_multi_inst_count_resources(device);
		if (count > 1)
			return false;
	}

This way we only move to a platform-device + i2c-multi-inst for BOSC0200 devices on devices which actually have multiple accelerometers defined in the node, avoiding the problem of breaking hwdb for existing devices.

Note arguably the force flag should be set on all existing entries in the i2c_multi_instantiate_ids, but at least the BSG1160 entry is expected to always have multiple I2cSerialBus resources and I guess the same may apply to the INT3515 case

The weird BYT/CHT INT33FE fake battery device is special and we always need to not create an i2c-client for it, so that we ignore the clkrate / speed from its bogus first and sometimes only I2cSerialBus resource.

Regards,

Hans

Quoted 56 lines
---
  drivers/acpi/scan.c                          | 1 +
  drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-i2c.c         | 1 -
  drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c | 7 +++++++
  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/acpi/scan.c +1 -0
index e9eda5558c1f..e46c877fa9f1 100644
@@ -1539,6 +1539,7 @@ static bool acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent(struct acpi_device *device)
  	 * which i2c_device_id to use for each resource.
  	 */
  	static const struct acpi_device_id i2c_multi_instantiate_ids[] = {
+		{"BOSC0200", },
  		{"BSG1160", },
  		{"INT33FE", },
  		{"INT3515", },
drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-i2c.c +0 -1
index 8ffc308d5fd0..9d22a4d9d568 100644
@@ -64,7 +64,6 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id bmc150_accel_acpi_match[] = {
  	{"BMA250E",	bma250e},
  	{"BMA222E",	bma222e},
  	{"BMA0280",	bma280},
-	{"BOSC0200"},
  	{ },
  };
  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, bmc150_accel_acpi_match);
drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c +7 -0
index efaf34cbbc7b..c90137d30a98 100644
@@ -151,6 +151,12 @@ static int i2c_multi_inst_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
  	return 0;
  }
 
+static const struct i2c_inst_data bosc0200_data[]  = {
+	{ "bmc150_accel" },
+	{ "bmc150_accel" },
+	{}
+};
+
  static const struct i2c_inst_data bsg1160_data[]  = {
  	{ "bmc150_accel", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },
  	{ "bmc150_magn" },
@@ -171,6 +177,7 @@ static const struct i2c_inst_data int3515_data[]  = {
   * drivers/acpi/scan.c: acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent().
   */
  static const struct acpi_device_id i2c_multi_inst_acpi_ids[] = {
+	{ "BOSC0200", (unsigned long)bosc0200_data },
  	{ "BSG1160", (unsigned long)bsg1160_data },
  	{ "INT3515", (unsigned long)int3515_data },
  	{ }
#21 lore raw

PATCH 15/15 iio: inv_mpu6050: Use i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource() helper

In reply to Andy Shevchenko

ACPI provides a generic helper to get I2C Serial Bus resources. Use it instead of open coded variant.

---
 drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_acpi.c | 16 ++++++----------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_acpi.c +6 -10
index d78a10403bac..a961b5a06fe6 100644
@@ -91,18 +91,14 @@ static int asus_acpi_get_sensor_info(struct acpi_device *adev,
 
 static int acpi_i2c_check_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
 {
+	struct acpi_resource_i2c_serialbus *sb;
 	u32 *addr = data;
 
-	if (ares->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_SERIAL_BUS) {
-		struct acpi_resource_i2c_serialbus *sb;
-
-		sb = &ares->data.i2c_serial_bus;
-		if (sb->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_SERIAL_TYPE_I2C) {
-			if (*addr)
-				*addr |= (sb->slave_address << 16);
-			else
-				*addr = sb->slave_address;
-		}
+	if (i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource(ares, &sb)) {
+		if (*addr)
+			*addr |= (sb->slave_address << 16);
+		else
+			*addr = sb->slave_address;
 	}
 
 	/* Tell the ACPI core that we already copied this address */
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
Reviewed-by on the v1 series
#22 lore raw
In reply to Andy Shevchenko

Hi,

Quoted 7 lines · Andy Shevchenko

Currently i2c-multi-instantiate driver does not support the case of INT3515 USB PD device, where:

- Interrupt() is used instead of GpioInt()
- All slaves may be the same from IP point of view
- There can be variadic amount of slaves

Quoted 5 lines

This series is addressing all above.

Notes:
- series has been smoke tested (Heikki would do BAT or more) on Coffee Lake system
- patch for BOSC0200 might be considered as RFC since the modalias potential issue

Yeah the BOSC0200 patch cannot go upstream as is, that will break the orientation quirks in hwdb on:

[hans@shalem systemd]$ grep BOSC0200 hwdb/60-sensor.hwdb | wc -l 17
[hans@shalem systemd]$

At least 17 different models laptops / 2-in-1s

Quoted 2 lines

The idea is to push this either through PDx86 tree (needs Rafael's ACKs) or ACPI. In any case it needs tags from Heikki, Hans, Mika, Wolfram and Jonathan.

Patches 1-5, 7-13 and 15 are:

I will send separate replies to:

[PATCH v1 06/15] i2c: acpi: Assign fwnode for devices created via i2c_acpi_new_device() [PATCH v1 14/15] ACPI / scan: Create platform device for BOSC0200 ACPI nodes

Which are both a NACK from me (in their current state) because they both will cause regressions.

Regards,

Hans

Quoted 32 lines

Testing and comments are warmly welcome.

Andy Shevchenko (15):
platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: Remove duplicate NULL check platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: Accept errors of

     i2c_acpi_new_device()
   platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Accept errors of
     i2c_acpi_new_device()

platform/x86: i2c-mutli-instantiate: Defer probe when no adapter found
i2c: acpi: Return error pointers from i2c_acpi_new_device()
i2c: acpi: Assign fwnode for devices created via i2c_acpi_new_device()
i2c: acpi: Use ACPI_FAILURE instead of !ACPI_SUCCESS
i2c: acpi: Introduce i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource() helper platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Count I2cSerialBus() resources platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Distinguish IRQ resource type platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Introduce IOAPIC IRQ support platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Allow to have same slaves ACPI / scan: Create platform device for INT3515 ACPI nodes ACPI / scan: Create platform device for BOSC0200 ACPI nodes
iio: inv_mpu6050: Use i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource() helper

  drivers/acpi/scan.c                          |  2 +
  drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c                  | 43 +++++----
  drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-i2c.c         |  1 -
  drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_acpi.c   | 16 ++--
  drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++----
  drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c     | 34 +++++--
  drivers/usb/typec/tps6598x.c                 |  8 +-
  include/linux/acpi.h                         | 11 +++
  8 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
#23 lore raw

Hi,

Quoted 23 lines · Hans de Goede

Hi,

Quoted 7 lines · Andy Shevchenko

Currently i2c-multi-instantiate driver does not support the case of INT3515 USB PD device, where:

- Interrupt() is used instead of GpioInt()
- All slaves may be the same from IP point of view
- There can be variadic amount of slaves

Quoted 5 lines

This series is addressing all above.

Notes:
- series has been smoke tested (Heikki would do BAT or more) on Coffee Lake system
- patch for BOSC0200 might be considered as RFC since the modalias potential issue

Yeah the BOSC0200 patch cannot go upstream as is, that will break the orientation quirks in hwdb on:

[hans@shalem systemd]$ grep BOSC0200 hwdb/60-sensor.hwdb | wc -l 17
[hans@shalem systemd]$

Quoted 7 lines

At least 17 different models laptops / 2-in-1s

Quoted 2 lines

The idea is to push this either through PDx86 tree (needs Rafael's ACKs) or ACPI. In any case it needs tags from Heikki, Hans, Mika, Wolfram and Jonathan.

Patches 1-5, 7-13 and 15 are: >

Correction, I also have some small remarks to patch 9:

[PATCH v1 09/15] platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Count I2cSerialBus() resources

Which will need to be addressed before you can add my Reviewed-by.

Regards,

Hans

Quoted 49 lines

I will send separate replies to:

[PATCH v1 06/15] i2c: acpi: Assign fwnode for devices created via i2c_acpi_new_device() [PATCH v1 14/15] ACPI / scan: Create platform device for BOSC0200 ACPI nodes

Which are both a NACK from me (in their current state) because they both will cause regressions.

Regards,

Hans

Quoted 32 lines

Testing and comments are warmly welcome.

Andy Shevchenko (15):
   platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: Remove duplicate NULL check platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: Accept errors of i2c_acpi_new_device()
   platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Accept errors of i2c_acpi_new_device()
   platform/x86: i2c-mutli-instantiate: Defer probe when no adapter found
   i2c: acpi: Return error pointers from i2c_acpi_new_device()
   i2c: acpi: Assign fwnode for devices created via i2c_acpi_new_device()
   i2c: acpi: Use ACPI_FAILURE instead of !ACPI_SUCCESS
   i2c: acpi: Introduce i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource() helper platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Count I2cSerialBus() resources platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Distinguish IRQ resource type platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Introduce IOAPIC IRQ support platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Allow to have same slaves ACPI / scan: Create platform device for INT3515 ACPI nodes ACPI / scan: Create platform device for BOSC0200 ACPI nodes
   iio: inv_mpu6050: Use i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource() helper

  drivers/acpi/scan.c                          |  2 + drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c                  | 43 +++++---- drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-i2c.c         |  1 - drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_acpi.c   | 16 ++-- drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++---- drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c     | 34 +++++-- drivers/usb/typec/tps6598x.c                 |  8 +- include/linux/acpi.h                         | 11 +++

  8 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
#24 lore raw
Quoted 4 lines · Hans de Goede
Quoted 2 lines · Hans de Goede

Patches 1-5, 7-13 and 15 are: >

Thanks!

Quoted 6 lines

Correction, I also have some small remarks to patch 9:

[PATCH v1 09/15] platform/x86: i2c-multi-instantiate: Count I2cSerialBus() resources

Which will need to be addressed before you can add my Reviewed-by.

Will be addressed for v2.

Thanks for review!

Signature · 2 lines
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko