Fix NMI IPI timeouts
Nicholas Piggin
reviewercover Fix NMI IPI timeouts
The first two patches fix timeouts and deadlocks using NMI IPIs. The xmon deadlock fails with a timeout so it wasn't really noticed. The infinite timeout only hits when the system is in really bad shape or the sreset handler is broken somehow (e.g., running a guest and no KVM test in the handler).
Patch 1 is a necessary fix. Patch 2 is a bigger change, we could live without it because the sender will eventually time out and break the deadlock.
Thanks,
Nick
Nicholas Piggin (3):
powerpc/smp: Fix NMI IPI timeout
powerpc/smp: Fix NMI IPI xmon timeout
powerpc/smp: __smp_send_nmi_ipi static
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 93 +++++++++++++-------------------------- 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.19.2
Nicholas Piggin
reviewerPATCH 1/3 powerpc/smp: Fix NMI IPI timeout
The NMI IPI timeout logic is broken, if __smp_send_nmi_ipi times out on the first condition, delay_us will be zero which will send it into the second spin loop with no timeout so it will spin forever.
--- arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c +3 -2
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ int __smp_send_nmi_ipi(int cpu, void (*fn)(struct pt_regs *), u64 delay_us, boolif (delay_us) { delay_us--;if (!delay_us) -break ; + goto timeout; } }
@@ -530,10 +530,11 @@ int __smp_send_nmi_ipi(int cpu, void (*fn)(struct pt_regs *), u64 delay_us, boolif (delay_us) { delay_us--;if (!delay_us) -break ; + goto timeout; } } +timeout:if (!cpumask_empty (&nmi_ipi_pending_mask)) {/* Timeout waiting for CPUs to call smp_handle_nmi_ipi */ ret =0 ;
Signature · 1 line
2.19.2
Re: [1/3] powerpc/smp: Fix NMI IPI timeout
Quoted 6 lines · Nicholas Piggin
The NMI IPI timeout logic is broken, if
__smp_send_nmi_ipitimes out on the first condition,delay_uswill be zero which will send it into the second spin loop with no timeout so it will spin forever.Fixes 5b73151fff63 ("powerpc: NMI IPI make NMI IPIs fully sychronous")Signed-off-by Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]>
Series applied to powerpc next, thanks.
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/1b5fc84aba170bdfe3533396ca9662ce
cheers
Nicholas Piggin
reviewerPATCH 2/3 powerpc/smp: Fix NMI IPI xmon timeout
In reply to Nicholas PigginThe xmon debugger IPI handler waits in the callback function while xmon is still active. This means they don't complete the IPI, and the initiator always times out waiting for them.
Things manage to work after the timeout because there is some fallback logic to keep NMI IPI state sane in case of the timeout, but this is a bit ugly.
This patch changes NMI IPI back to half-asynchronous (i.e., wait for everyone to call in, do not wait for IPI function to complete), but the complexity is avoided by going one step further and allowing new IPIs to be issued before the IPI functions to all complete.
If synchronization against that is required, it is left up to the caller, but current callers don't require that. In fact with the timeout handling, callers must be able to cope with this already.
--- arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 93 ++++++++++++--------------------------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c +29 -64
@@ -358,13 +358,12 @@ void arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask)* NMI IPIs may not be recoverable, so should not be used as ongoing part of * a running system. They can be used for crash, debug, halt/reboot, etc. * -* NMI IPIs are globally single threaded. No more than one in progress at -* any time. -* * The IPI call waits with interrupts disabled until all targets enter the -* NMI handler, then the call returns. +* NMI handler, then returns. Subsequent IPIs can be issued before targets +* have returned from their handlers, so there is no guarantee about +* concurrency or re-entrancy. * -* No new NMI can be initiated until targets exit the handler. +* A new NMI can be issued before all targets exit the handler. * * The IPI call may time out without all targets entering the NMI handler. * In that case, there is some logic to recover (and ignore subsequent
@@ -375,7 +374,7 @@ void arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask)static atomic_t __nmi_ipi_lock =ATOMIC_INIT (0 );static struct cpumask nmi_ipi_pending_mask; -static int nmi_ipi_busy_count =0 ; +static bool nmi_ipi_busy = false;static void (*nmi_ipi_function)(struct pt_regs *) =NULL ;static void nmi_ipi_lock_start (unsigned long *flags)
@@ -414,7 +413,7 @@ static void nmi_ipi_unlock_end(unsigned long *flags)*/ int smp_handle_nmi_ipi (struct pt_regs *regs) { -void (*fn)(struct pt_regs *); +void (*fn)(struct pt_regs *) =NULL ;unsigned long flags;int me =raw_smp_processor_id ();int ret =0 ;
@@ -425,29 +424,17 @@ int smp_handle_nmi_ipi(struct pt_regs *regs)* because the caller may have timed out. */ nmi_ipi_lock_start (&flags); -if (!nmi_ipi_busy_count) - goto out; -if (!cpumask_test_cpu (me, &nmi_ipi_pending_mask)) - goto out; - - fn = nmi_ipi_function; -if (!fn) - goto out; - -cpumask_clear_cpu (me, &nmi_ipi_pending_mask); - nmi_ipi_busy_count++; -nmi_ipi_unlock (); - - ret =1 ; - -fn (regs); - -nmi_ipi_lock (); -if (nmi_ipi_busy_count >1 )/* Can race with caller time-out */ - nmi_ipi_busy_count--; -out: +if (cpumask_test_cpu (me, &nmi_ipi_pending_mask)) { +cpumask_clear_cpu (me, &nmi_ipi_pending_mask); + fn =READ_ONCE (nmi_ipi_function); +WARN_ON_ONCE (!fn); + ret =1 ; + }nmi_ipi_unlock_end (&flags); +if (fn) +fn (regs); +return ret; }
@@ -473,7 +460,7 @@ static void do_smp_send_nmi_ipi(int cpu, bool safe)* - cpu is the target CPU (must not be this CPU), or NMI_IPI_ALL_OTHERS. * - fn is the target callback function. * - delay_us > 0 is the delay before giving up waiting for targets to -* complete executing the handler, == 0 specifies indefinite delay. +* begin executing the handler, == 0 specifies indefinite delay. */ int __smp_send_nmi_ipi (int cpu,void (*fn)(struct pt_regs *),u64 delay_us,bool safe) {
@@ -487,31 +474,33 @@ int __smp_send_nmi_ipi(int cpu, void (*fn)(struct pt_regs *), u64 delay_us, boolif (unlikely (!smp_ops))return 0 ; -/* Take the nmi_ipi_busy count/lock with interrupts hard disabled */ nmi_ipi_lock_start (&flags); -while (nmi_ipi_busy_count) { +while (nmi_ipi_busy) {nmi_ipi_unlock_end (&flags); -spin_until_cond (nmi_ipi_busy_count ==0 ); +spin_until_cond (!nmi_ipi_busy);nmi_ipi_lock_start (&flags); } - + nmi_ipi_busy = true; nmi_ipi_function = fn; +WARN_ON_ONCE (!cpumask_empty (&nmi_ipi_pending_mask)); +if (cpu <0 ) {/* ALL_OTHERS */ cpumask_copy (&nmi_ipi_pending_mask, cpu_online_mask);cpumask_clear_cpu (me, &nmi_ipi_pending_mask); }else { -/* cpumask starts clear */ cpumask_set_cpu (cpu, &nmi_ipi_pending_mask); } - nmi_ipi_busy_count++; +nmi_ipi_unlock (); +/* Interrupts remain hard disabled */ +do_smp_send_nmi_ipi (cpu, safe);nmi_ipi_lock (); -/* nmi_ipi_busy_count is held here, so unlock/lock is okay */ +/* nmi_ipi_busy is set here, so unlock/lock is okay */ while (!cpumask_empty (&nmi_ipi_pending_mask)) {nmi_ipi_unlock ();udelay (1 );
@@ -519,34 +508,19 @@ int __smp_send_nmi_ipi(int cpu, void (*fn)(struct pt_regs *), u64 delay_us, boolif (delay_us) { delay_us--;if (!delay_us) - goto timeout; +break ; } } -while (nmi_ipi_busy_count >1 ) { -nmi_ipi_unlock (); -udelay (1 ); -nmi_ipi_lock (); -if (delay_us) { - delay_us--; -if (!delay_us) - goto timeout; - } - } - -timeout:if (!cpumask_empty (&nmi_ipi_pending_mask)) {/* Timeout waiting for CPUs to call smp_handle_nmi_ipi */ ret =0 ;cpumask_clear (&nmi_ipi_pending_mask); } -if (nmi_ipi_busy_count >1 ) { -/* Timeout waiting for CPUs to execute fn */ - ret =0 ; - nmi_ipi_busy_count =1 ; - } - nmi_ipi_busy_count--; + nmi_ipi_function =NULL ; + nmi_ipi_busy = false; +nmi_ipi_unlock_end (&flags);return ret;
@@ -614,17 +588,8 @@ void crash_send_ipi(void (*crash_ipi_callback)(struct pt_regs *))static void nmi_stop_this_cpu (struct pt_regs *regs) {/* -* This is a special case because it never returns, so the NMI IPI -* handling would never mark it as done, which makes any later -* smp_send_nmi_ipi() call spin forever. Mark it done now. -* * IRQs are already hard disabled by the smp_handle_nmi_ipi. */ -nmi_ipi_lock (); -if (nmi_ipi_busy_count >1 ) - nmi_ipi_busy_count--; -nmi_ipi_unlock (); -spin_begin ();while (1 )spin_cpu_relax ();
Signature · 1 line
2.19.2
Nicholas Piggin
reviewerPATCH 3/3 powerpc/smp: __smp_send_nmi_ipi static
In reply to Nicholas Piggin--- arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c +2 -1
@@ -462,7 +462,8 @@ static void do_smp_send_nmi_ipi(int cpu, bool safe)* - delay_us > 0 is the delay before giving up waiting for targets to * begin executing the handler, == 0 specifies indefinite delay. */ -int __smp_send_nmi_ipi (int cpu,void (*fn)(struct pt_regs *),u64 delay_us,bool safe) +static int __smp_send_nmi_ipi (int cpu,void (*fn)(struct pt_regs *), +u64 delay_us,bool safe) {unsigned long flags;int me =raw_smp_processor_id ();
Signature · 1 line
2.19.2