staging: wilc1000: correct inconsistent indenting
PATCH 1/1 staging: wilc1000: correct inconsistent indenting
Correct inconsistent indenting reported by smatch.
--- drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c +1 -1
@@ -963,7 +963,7 @@ static int wilc_spi_read_int(struct wilc *wilc, u32 *int_status)dev_err (&spi->dev,"Unexpected interrupt(2):j=%d,tmp=%x,mask=%x\n" , j, tmp, unknown_mask); - happened =1 ; + happened =1 ; } j++;
Signature · 1 line
2.19.2
Quoted 1 line · Michael Straube
Correct inconsistent indenting reported by smatch.
[]
drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c
Quoted 1 line
drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c +0
-0
[]
drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c static int wilc_spi_read_int(struct wilc *wilc, u32 *int_status) · line 969
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c +1
-1@@ -963,7 +963,7 @@ static int wilc_spi_read_int(struct wilc *wilc, u32 *int_status)dev_err (&spi->dev,"Unexpected interrupt(2):j=%d,tmp=%x,mask=%x\n" , j, tmp, unknown_mask); - happened =1 ; + happened = 1;s a } j++;
Perhaps a little refactoring instead
--- drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c | 12 +++++------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c +5 -7
@@ -927,7 +927,8 @@ static int wilc_spi_read_int(struct wilc *wilc, u32 *int_status)int ret;u32 tmp;u32 byte_cnt; -int happened, j; +bool unexpected_irq; +int j;u32 unknown_mask;u32 irq_flags;int k =IRG_FLAGS_OFFSET +5 ;
@@ -947,8 +948,6 @@ static int wilc_spi_read_int(struct wilc *wilc, u32 *int_status) j =0 ; do { - happened = 0; - wilc_spi_read_reg(wilc, 0x1a90, &irq_flags); tmp |= ((irq_flags >> 27) << IRG_FLAGS_OFFSET);
@@ -959,15 +958,14 @@ static int wilc_spi_read_int(struct wilc *wilc, u32 *int_status) unknown_mask = ~((1ul << spi_priv->nint) -1 ); -if ((tmp >>IRG_FLAGS_OFFSET ) & unknown_mask) { + unexpected_irq = (tmp >>IRG_FLAGS_OFFSET ) & unknown_mask; +if (unexpected_irq)dev_err (&spi->dev,"Unexpected interrupt(2):j=%d,tmp=%x,mask=%x\n" , j, tmp, unknown_mask); - happened =1 ; - } j++; - }while (happened); + }while (unexpected_irq); *int_status = tmp;
Quoted 53 lines · Joe Perches
Quoted 1 line · Michael Straube
Correct inconsistent indenting reported by smatch.
[]
drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c
Quoted 1 line
drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c +0
-0[]
drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c static int wilc_spi_read_int(struct wilc *wilc, u32 *int_status) · line 969
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c +1
-1@@ -963,7 +963,7 @@ static int wilc_spi_read_int(struct wilc *wilc, u32 *int_status)dev_err (&spi->dev,"Unexpected interrupt(2):j=%d,tmp=%x,mask=%x\n" , j, tmp, unknown_mask); - happened =1 ; + happened = 1;s a } j++;Perhaps a little refactoring instead
--- drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c | 12 +++++------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c +4
-4@@ -927,7 +927,8 @@ static int wilc_spi_read_int(struct wilc *wilc, u32 *int_status)int ret;u32 tmp;u32 byte_cnt; -int happened, j; +bool unexpected_irq; +int j;u32 unknown_mask;u32 irq_flags;int k =IRG_FLAGS_OFFSET +5 ;@@ -947,8 +948,6 @@ static int wilc_spi_read_int(struct wilc *wilc, u32 *int_status) j =0 ; do { - happened = 0; - wilc_spi_read_reg(wilc, 0x1a90, &irq_flags); tmp |= ((irq_flags >> 27) << IRG_FLAGS_OFFSET);@@ -959,15 +958,14 @@ static int wilc_spi_read_int(struct wilc *wilc, u32 *int_status) unknown_mask = ~((1ul << spi_priv->nint) -1 ); -if ((tmp >>IRG_FLAGS_OFFSET ) & unknown_mask) { + unexpected_irq = (tmp >>IRG_FLAGS_OFFSET ) & unknown_mask; +if (unexpected_irq) dev_err(&spi->dev, "Unexpected interrupt(2):j=%d,tmp=%x,mask=%x\n",
drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c static int wilc_spi_read_int(struct wilc *wilc, u32 *int_status) · line 971
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_spi.c +1
-3j, tmp, unknown_mask); - happened =1 ; - } j++; - }while (happened); + }while (unexpected_irq); *int_status = tmp;
Hi Joe,
that looks good to me.
Naming the loop condition unexpected_irq also improves readability.
I will send a new patch, thanks.
Michael