hw: acpi: RSDP fixes and refactoring
v3 cover hw: acpi: RSDP fixes and refactoring
This patch serie fixes a couple of RSDP checksum related issues:
- On RSDP rev2, we are not adding the extended checksum and computing the checksum on the full table instead of the first 20 bytes.
- On RSDP rev1, we are computing the checksum on 36 bytes instead of 20. We're lucky enough that this is only adding zeroes to the checksum.
A guest Linux kernel does not seem to care about RSDP checksums, so those 2 fixes are mostly for correctness sake.
Any machine type that generates rev2 RSDP will see its RSDP table modified but since x86 builds RSDP v1 and all ACPI tests only run on either pc or q35, the ACPI tests tables are not affected by this fix.
The serie also extends the ARM virt ACPI RSDP build routine to support both RSDP v1 and v2, in order to share this code between x86 and aarch64. While extending, we also convert the routine to the latest build_append_foo() API. The new implementation is a closer reflection of the ACPI spec itself, is endian agnostic and allows for getting rid of the AcpiRsdpDescriptor structure.
V2 -> V3:
* Add Reviewed-Bys from Igor and Andrew.
* Check for valid RSDP and XSDT pointers depending on the revision.
* Use RSDP initial table len as offset for checksum and pointer insertion.
* Do not explictly pass RSDP revision as the RSDP table parsing test utility.
v1 -> v2:
* Add missing SOBs.
* Rephrase some commit messages according to the maintainer's input.
* Replace ACPI spec definitions with hard coded constants.
* Replace init_rsdp_data() helper with open coded rsdp variable init.
* Rename acpi_find_[rx]sdt_address to acpi_get_[rx]sdt_address.
Igor Mammedov (2):
hw: arm: acpi: Fix incorrect checksums in RSDP
hw: i386: Use correct RSDT length for checksum
Samuel Ortiz (6):
hw: acpi: The RSDP build API can return void
hw: arm: Carry RSDP specific data through AcpiRsdpData
hw: arm: Convert the RSDP build to the buid_append_foo() API
hw: arm: Support both legacy and current RSDP build
hw: acpi: Export and share the ARM RSDP build
hw: acpi: Remove AcpiRsdpDescriptor and fix tests
include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h | 19 ++++------- include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h | 2 ++ tests/acpi-utils.h | 4 ++- hw/acpi/aml-build.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 40 +++++----------------- hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 36 +++++--------------- tests/acpi-utils.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++----- tests/bios-tables-test.c | 21 +++++++++--- tests/vmgenid-test.c | 8 +++-- 9 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.19.2
PATCH v3 1/8 hw: acpi: The RSDP build API can return void
For both x86 and ARM architectures, the internal RSDP build API can return void as the current return value is unused.
--- hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 4 +--- hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 4 +--- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c +1 -3
@@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_power_button(Aml *scope) }/* RSDP */ -static GArray * +static void build_rsdp (GArray *rsdp_table,BIOSLinker *linker,unsigned xsdt_tbl_offset) {AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp =acpi_data_push (rsdp_table,sizeof *rsdp);
@@ -392,8 +392,6 @@ build_rsdp(GArray *rsdp_table, BIOSLinker *linker, unsigned xsdt_tbl_offset)bios_linker_loader_add_checksum (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , (char *)rsdp - rsdp_table->data,sizeof *rsdp, (char *)&rsdp->checksum - rsdp_table->data); - -return rsdp_table; } static void
hw/i386/acpi-build.c +1 -3
@@ -2547,7 +2547,7 @@ build_amd_iommu(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker) "IVRS", table_data->len - iommu_start, 1, NULL, NULL); } -static GArray * +static void build_rsdp (GArray *rsdp_table,BIOSLinker *linker,unsigned rsdt_tbl_offset) {AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp =acpi_data_push (rsdp_table,sizeof *rsdp);
@@ -2569,8 +2569,6 @@ build_rsdp(GArray *rsdp_table, BIOSLinker *linker, unsigned rsdt_tbl_offset)bios_linker_loader_add_checksum (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , (char *)rsdp - rsdp_table->data,sizeof *rsdp, (char *)&rsdp->checksum - rsdp_table->data); - -return rsdp_table; } typedef
Signature · 1 line
2.19.2
PATCH v3 2/8 hw: arm: acpi: Fix incorrect checksums in RSDP
In reply to Samuel OrtizFrom: Igor Mammedov <[email protected]>
When RSDP table was introduced (d4bec5d87), we calculated only legacy checksum, and that was incorrect as it
- specified rev=2 and forgot about extended checksum.
- legacy checksum calculated on full table instead of the 1st 20 bytes
Fix it by adding extended checksum calculation and using correct size for legacy checksum.
While at it use explicit constants to specify sub/full tables
sizes instead of relying on AcpiRsdpDescriptor size and fields offsets. The follow up commits will convert this table to build_append_int_noprefix() API, will use constants anyway and remove unused AcpiRsdpDescriptor structure.
Based on "[PATCH v5 05/24] hw: acpi: Implement XSDT support for RSDP" by Samuel Ortiz, who did it right in his impl.
--- hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c +6 -1
@@ -390,8 +390,13 @@ build_rsdp(GArray *rsdp_table, BIOSLinker *linker, unsigned xsdt_tbl_offset)/* Checksum to be filled by Guest linker */ bios_linker_loader_add_checksum (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , - (char *)rsdp - rsdp_table->data,sizeof *rsdp, + (char *)rsdp - rsdp_table->data,20 /* ACPI rev 1.0 RSDP size */ , (char *)&rsdp->checksum - rsdp_table->data); + +/* Extended checksum to be filled by Guest linker */ +bios_linker_loader_add_checksum (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , + (char *)rsdp - rsdp_table->data,36 /* ACPI rev 2.0 RSDP size */ , + (char *)&rsdp->extended_checksum - rsdp_table->data); } static void
Signature · 1 line
2.19.2
PATCH v3 3/8 hw: i386: Use correct RSDT length for checksum
In reply to Samuel OrtizFrom: Igor Mammedov <[email protected]>
AcpiRsdpDescriptor describes revision 2 RSDP table so using sizeof(*rsdp) for checksum calculation isn't correct since we are adding extra 16 bytes. But acpi_data_push() zeroes out table, so just by luck we are summing up exta zeros which still yelds correct checksum.
Fix it up by explicitly stating table size instead of using pointer arithmetics on stucture.
PS:
Extra 16 bytes are still wasted, but droping them will break migration for machines older than 2.3 due to size mismatch, for 2.3 and older it's not an issue since they are using resizable memory regions (a1666142d) for ACPI blobs. So keep wasting memory to avoid breaking old machines.
--- hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
hw/i386/acpi-build.c +6 -1
@@ -2550,6 +2550,11 @@ build_amd_iommu(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker)static void build_rsdp (GArray *rsdp_table,BIOSLinker *linker,unsigned rsdt_tbl_offset) { +/* AcpiRsdpDescriptor describes revision 2 RSDP table and as result we +* allocate extra 16 bytes for pc/q35 RSDP rev1 as well. Keep extra 16 bytes +* wasted to make sure we won't breake migration for machine types older +* than 2.3 due to size mismatch. +*/ AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp =acpi_data_push (rsdp_table,sizeof *rsdp);unsigned rsdt_pa_size =sizeof (rsdp->rsdt_physical_address); unsigned rsdt_pa_offset =
@@ -2567,7 +2572,7 @@ build_rsdp(GArray *rsdp_table, BIOSLinker *linker, unsigned rsdt_tbl_offset)/* Checksum to be filled by Guest linker */ bios_linker_loader_add_checksum (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , - (char *)rsdp - rsdp_table->data,sizeof *rsdp, + (char *)rsdp - rsdp_table->data,20 /* ACPI rev 1.0 RSDP size */ , (char *)&rsdp->checksum - rsdp_table->data); }
Signature · 1 line
2.19.2
PATCH v3 4/8 hw: arm: Carry RSDP specific data through AcpiRsdpData
In reply to Samuel OrtizThat will allow us to generalize the ARM build_rsdp() routine to support both legacy RSDP (The current i386 implementation) and extended RSDP (The ARM implementation).
--- include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h | 8 ++++++++ hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h +8 -0
@@ -53,6 +53,14 @@ struct AcpiRsdpDescriptor { /* Root System Descriptor Pointer */ }QEMU_PACKED ;typedef struct AcpiRsdpDescriptor AcpiRsdpDescriptor ; +typedef struct AcpiRsdpData { +uint8_t oem_id[6 ];/* OEM identification */ +uint8_t revision;/* Must be 0 for 1.0, 2 for 2.0 */ + +unsigned *rsdt_tbl_offset; +unsigned *xsdt_tbl_offset; +}AcpiRsdpData ; +/* Table structure from Linux kernel (the ACPI tables are under the BSD license) */
hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c +13 -5
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_power_button(Aml *scope)/* RSDP */ static void -build_rsdp (GArray *rsdp_table,BIOSLinker *linker,unsigned xsdt_tbl_offset) +build_rsdp (GArray *rsdp_table,BIOSLinker *linker,AcpiRsdpData *rsdp_data) {AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp =acpi_data_push (rsdp_table,sizeof *rsdp);unsigned xsdt_pa_size =sizeof (rsdp->xsdt_physical_address);
@@ -379,14 +379,14 @@ build_rsdp(GArray *rsdp_table, BIOSLinker *linker, unsigned xsdt_tbl_offset) true /* fseg memory */);memcpy (&rsdp->signature,"RSD PTR " ,sizeof (rsdp->signature)); -memcpy (rsdp->oem_id,ACPI_BUILD_APPNAME6 ,sizeof (rsdp->oem_id)); +memcpy (rsdp->oem_id, rsdp_data->oem_id,sizeof (rsdp->oem_id)); rsdp->length =cpu_to_le32 (sizeof (*rsdp)); - rsdp->revision =0x02 ; + rsdp->revision = rsdp_data->revision;/* Address to be filled by Guest linker */ bios_linker_loader_add_pointer (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , xsdt_pa_offset, xsdt_pa_size, -ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE , xsdt_tbl_offset); +ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE , *rsdp_data->xsdt_tbl_offset);/* Checksum to be filled by Guest linker */ bios_linker_loader_add_checksum(linker, ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE,
@@ -857,7 +857,15 @@ void virt_acpi_build(VirtMachineState *vms, AcpiBuildTables *tables)build_xsdt (tables_blob, tables->linker, table_offsets,NULL ,NULL );/* RSDP is in FSEG memory, so allocate it separately */ -build_rsdp (tables->rsdp, tables->linker, xsdt); + { +AcpiRsdpData rsdp_data = { + .revision =2 , + .oem_id =ACPI_BUILD_APPNAME6 , + .xsdt_tbl_offset = &xsdt, + .rsdt_tbl_offset =NULL , + }; +build_rsdp (tables->rsdp, tables->linker, &rsdp_data); + }/* Cleanup memory that's no longer used. */ g_array_free (table_offsets, true);
Signature · 1 line
2.19.2
Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/8] hw: arm: Carry RSDP specific data through AcpiRsdpData
Quoted 11 lines · Samuel Ortiz
That will allow us to generalize the ARM
build_rsdp()routine to support both legacy RSDP (The current i386 implementation) and extended RSDP (The ARM implementation).Signed-off-by Samuel Ortiz <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Igor Mammedov <[email protected]>--- include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h | 8 ++++++++ hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
PATCH v3 5/8 hw: arm: Convert the RSDP build to the buid_append_foo() API
In reply to Samuel OrtizInstead of filling a mapped and packed C structure field in random order and being careful about endianness and sizes, build_rsdp() now uses build_append_int_noprefix() to compose RSDP table.
This makes reviewing and maintaining code easier as this is almost matching 1:1 the ACPI spec itself.
--- hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c +23 -19
@@ -368,35 +368,39 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_power_button(Aml *scope)/* RSDP */ static void -build_rsdp (GArray *rsdp_table,BIOSLinker *linker,AcpiRsdpData *rsdp_data) +build_rsdp (GArray *tbl,BIOSLinker *linker,AcpiRsdpData *rsdp_data) { -AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp =acpi_data_push (rsdp_table,sizeof *rsdp); -unsigned xsdt_pa_size =sizeof (rsdp->xsdt_physical_address); -unsigned xsdt_pa_offset = - (char *)&rsdp->xsdt_physical_address - rsdp_table->data; +int tbl_off = tbl->len;/* Table offset in the RSDP file */ -bios_linker_loader_alloc (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , rsdp_table,16 , +bios_linker_loader_alloc (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , tbl,16 , true/* fseg memory */ ); -memcpy (&rsdp->signature,"RSD PTR " ,sizeof (rsdp->signature)); -memcpy (rsdp->oem_id, rsdp_data->oem_id,sizeof (rsdp->oem_id)); - rsdp->length =cpu_to_le32 (sizeof (*rsdp)); - rsdp->revision = rsdp_data->revision; +g_array_append_vals (tbl,"RSD PTR " ,8 );/* Signature */ +build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,1 );/* Checksum */ +g_array_append_vals (tbl, rsdp_data->oem_id,6 );/* OEMID */ +build_append_int_noprefix (tbl, rsdp_data->revision,1 );/* Revision */ +build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,4 );/* RsdtAddress */ +build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,36 ,4 );/* Length */ -/* Address to be filled by Guest linker */ -bios_linker_loader_add_pointer (linker, -ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , xsdt_pa_offset, xsdt_pa_size, -ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE , *rsdp_data->xsdt_tbl_offset); +/* XSDT address to be filled by guest linker */ +build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,8 );/* XsdtAddress */ +bios_linker_loader_add_pointer (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , + tbl_off +24 ,8 , +ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE , + *rsdp_data->xsdt_tbl_offset); -/* Checksum to be filled by Guest linker */ +build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,1 );/* Extended Checksum */ +build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,3 );/* Reserved */ + +/* Checksum to be filled by guest linker */ bios_linker_loader_add_checksum (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , - (char *)rsdp - rsdp_table->data,20 /* ACPI rev 1.0 RSDP size */ , - (char *)&rsdp->checksum - rsdp_table->data); + tbl_off,20 ,/* ACPI rev 1.0 RSDP size */ +8 );/* Extended checksum to be filled by Guest linker */ bios_linker_loader_add_checksum (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , - (char *)rsdp - rsdp_table->data,36 /* ACPI rev 2.0 RSDP size */ , - (char *)&rsdp->extended_checksum - rsdp_table->data); + tbl_off,36 ,/* ACPI rev 2.0 RSDP size */ +32 ); } static void
Signature · 1 line
2.19.2
Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v3 5/8] hw: arm: Convert the RSDP build to the buid_append_foo() API
Quoted 9 lines · On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:00:29 +0100 Samuel Ortiz <[email protected]> wrote:
Instead of filling a mapped and packed C structure field in random order and being careful about endianness and sizes,
build_rsdp()now usesbuild_append_int_noprefix()to compose RSDP table.This makes reviewing and maintaining code easier as this is almost matching 1:1 the ACPI spec itself.
Reviewed-by Andrew Jones <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Samuel Ortiz <[email protected]>
Quoted 67 lines
--- hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c +23
-19@@ -368,35 +368,39 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_power_button(Aml *scope)/* RSDP */ static void -build_rsdp (GArray *rsdp_table,BIOSLinker *linker,AcpiRsdpData *rsdp_data) +build_rsdp (GArray *tbl,BIOSLinker *linker,AcpiRsdpData *rsdp_data) { -AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp =acpi_data_push (rsdp_table,sizeof *rsdp); -unsigned xsdt_pa_size =sizeof (rsdp->xsdt_physical_address); -unsigned xsdt_pa_offset = - (char *)&rsdp->xsdt_physical_address - rsdp_table->data; +int tbl_off = tbl->len;/* Table offset in the RSDP file */ -bios_linker_loader_alloc (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , rsdp_table,16 , +bios_linker_loader_alloc (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , tbl,16 , true/* fseg memory */ ); -memcpy (&rsdp->signature,"RSD PTR " ,sizeof (rsdp->signature)); -memcpy (rsdp->oem_id, rsdp_data->oem_id,sizeof (rsdp->oem_id)); - rsdp->length =cpu_to_le32 (sizeof (*rsdp)); - rsdp->revision = rsdp_data->revision; +g_array_append_vals (tbl,"RSD PTR " ,8 );/* Signature */ +build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,1 );/* Checksum */ +g_array_append_vals (tbl, rsdp_data->oem_id,6 );/* OEMID */ +build_append_int_noprefix (tbl, rsdp_data->revision,1 );/* Revision */ +build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,4 );/* RsdtAddress */ +build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,36 ,4 );/* Length */ -/* Address to be filled by Guest linker */ -bios_linker_loader_add_pointer (linker, -ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , xsdt_pa_offset, xsdt_pa_size, -ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE , *rsdp_data->xsdt_tbl_offset); +/* XSDT address to be filled by guest linker */ +build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,8 );/* XsdtAddress */ +bios_linker_loader_add_pointer (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , + tbl_off +24 ,8 , +ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE , + *rsdp_data->xsdt_tbl_offset); -/* Checksum to be filled by Guest linker */ +build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,1 );/* Extended Checksum */ +build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,3 );/* Reserved */ + +/* Checksum to be filled by guest linker */ bios_linker_loader_add_checksum (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , - (char *)rsdp - rsdp_table->data,20 /* ACPI rev 1.0 RSDP size */ , - (char *)&rsdp->checksum - rsdp_table->data); + tbl_off,20 ,/* ACPI rev 1.0 RSDP size */ +8 );/* Extended checksum to be filled by Guest linker */ bios_linker_loader_add_checksum (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , - (char *)rsdp - rsdp_table->data,36 /* ACPI rev 2.0 RSDP size */ , - (char *)&rsdp->extended_checksum - rsdp_table->data); + tbl_off,36 ,/* ACPI rev 2.0 RSDP size */ +32 ); } static void
PATCH v3 6/8 hw: arm: Support both legacy and current RSDP build
In reply to Samuel OrtizWe add the ability to build legacy or current RSDP tables, based on the AcpiRsdpData revision field passed to build_rsdp().
Although arm/virt only uses RSDP v2, adding that capability to build_rsdp will allow us to share the RSDP build code between ARM and x86.
--- hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c +34 -5
@@ -370,8 +370,23 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_power_button(Aml *scope)static void build_rsdp (GArray *tbl,BIOSLinker *linker,AcpiRsdpData *rsdp_data) { +int tbl_off = tbl->len;/* Table offset in the RSDP file */ +switch (rsdp_data->revision) { +case 0 : +/* With ACPI 1.0, we must have an RSDT pointer */ +g_assert (rsdp_data->rsdt_tbl_offset); +break ; +case 2 : +/* With ACPI 2.0+, we must have an XSDT pointer */ +g_assert (rsdp_data->xsdt_tbl_offset); +break ; +default : +/* Only revisions 0 (ACPI 1.0) and 2 (ACPI 2.0+) are valid for RSDP */ +g_assert_not_reached (); + } +bios_linker_loader_alloc (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , tbl,16 , true/* fseg memory */ );
@@ -380,10 +395,29 @@ build_rsdp(GArray *tbl, BIOSLinker *linker, AcpiRsdpData *rsdp_data)g_array_append_vals (tbl, rsdp_data->oem_id,6 );/* OEMID */ build_append_int_noprefix (tbl, rsdp_data->revision,1 );/* Revision */ build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,4 );/* RsdtAddress */ +if (rsdp_data->rsdt_tbl_offset) { +/* RSDT address to be filled by guest linker */ +bios_linker_loader_add_pointer (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , + tbl_off +16 ,4 , +ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE , + *rsdp_data->rsdt_tbl_offset); + } + +/* Checksum to be filled by guest linker */ +bios_linker_loader_add_checksum (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , + tbl_off,20 ,/* ACPI rev 1.0 RSDP size */ +8 ); + +if (rsdp_data->revision ==0 ) { +/* ACPI 1.0 RSDP, we're done */ +return ; + } +build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,36 ,4 );/* Length */ /* XSDT address to be filled by guest linker */ build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,8 );/* XsdtAddress */ +/* We already validated our xsdt pointer */ bios_linker_loader_add_pointer(linker, ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE, tbl_off + 24, 8, ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE,
@@ -392,11 +426,6 @@ build_rsdp(GArray *tbl, BIOSLinker *linker, AcpiRsdpData *rsdp_data)build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,1 );/* Extended Checksum */ build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,3 );/* Reserved */ -/* Checksum to be filled by guest linker */ -bios_linker_loader_add_checksum (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , - tbl_off,20 ,/* ACPI rev 1.0 RSDP size */ -8 ); -/* Extended checksum to be filled by Guest linker */ bios_linker_loader_add_checksum(linker, ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE, tbl_off, 36, /* ACPI rev 2.0 RSDP size */
Signature · 1 line
2.19.2
Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v3 6/8] hw: arm: Support both legacy and current RSDP build
Quoted 16 lines · On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:00:30 +0100 Samuel Ortiz <[email protected]> wrote:
We add the ability to build legacy or current RSDP tables, based on the AcpiRsdpData revision field passed to
build_rsdp().
Although arm/virt only uses RSDP v2, adding that capability tobuild_rsdpwill allow us to share the RSDP build code between ARM and x86.Signed-off-by Samuel Ortiz <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Igor Mammedov <[email protected]>--- hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c +0
-0
hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c static void acpi_dsdt_add_power_button(Aml *scope) · line 373
Quoted 4 lines
hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c +1
-0@@ -370,8 +370,23 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_power_button(Aml *scope)static void build_rsdp (GArray *tbl,BIOSLinker *linker,AcpiRsdpData *rsdp_data) { +
unrelated white space change
(you can do v4 of this patch as reply to this patch and add changelog below ---
so it would be clear what's changed)
Quoted 61 lines
hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c +33
-5int tbl_off = tbl->len;/* Table offset in the RSDP file */ +switch (rsdp_data->revision) { +case 0 : +/* With ACPI 1.0, we must have an RSDT pointer */ +g_assert (rsdp_data->rsdt_tbl_offset); +break ; +case 2 : +/* With ACPI 2.0+, we must have an XSDT pointer */ +g_assert (rsdp_data->xsdt_tbl_offset); +break ; +default : +/* Only revisions 0 (ACPI 1.0) and 2 (ACPI 2.0+) are valid for RSDP */ +g_assert_not_reached (); + } +bios_linker_loader_alloc (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , tbl,16 , true/* fseg memory */ );@@ -380,10 +395,29 @@ build_rsdp(GArray *tbl, BIOSLinker *linker, AcpiRsdpData *rsdp_data)g_array_append_vals (tbl, rsdp_data->oem_id,6 );/* OEMID */ build_append_int_noprefix (tbl, rsdp_data->revision,1 );/* Revision */ build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,4 );/* RsdtAddress */ +if (rsdp_data->rsdt_tbl_offset) { +/* RSDT address to be filled by guest linker */ +bios_linker_loader_add_pointer (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , + tbl_off +16 ,4 , +ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE , + *rsdp_data->rsdt_tbl_offset); + } + +/* Checksum to be filled by guest linker */ +bios_linker_loader_add_checksum (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , + tbl_off,20 ,/* ACPI rev 1.0 RSDP size */ +8 ); + +if (rsdp_data->revision ==0 ) { +/* ACPI 1.0 RSDP, we're done */ +return ; + } +build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,36 ,4 );/* Length */ /* XSDT address to be filled by guest linker */ build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,8 );/* XsdtAddress */ +/* We already validated our xsdt pointer */ bios_linker_loader_add_pointer(linker, ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE, tbl_off + 24, 8, ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE,@@ -392,11 +426,6 @@ build_rsdp(GArray *tbl, BIOSLinker *linker, AcpiRsdpData *rsdp_data)build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,1 );/* Extended Checksum */ build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,3 );/* Reserved */ -/* Checksum to be filled by guest linker */ -bios_linker_loader_add_checksum (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , - tbl_off,20 ,/* ACPI rev 1.0 RSDP size */ -8 ); -/* Extended checksum to be filled by Guest linker */ bios_linker_loader_add_checksum(linker, ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE, tbl_off, 36, /* ACPI rev 2.0 RSDP size */
Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 6/8] hw: arm: Support both legacy and current RSDP build
In reply to Samuel OrtizQuoted 11 lines · Samuel Ortiz
We add the ability to build legacy or current RSDP tables, based on the AcpiRsdpData revision field passed to
build_rsdp().
Although arm/virt only uses RSDP v2, adding that capability tobuild_rsdpwill allow us to share the RSDP build code between ARM and x86.Signed-off-by Samuel Ortiz <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Igor Mammedov <[email protected]>--- hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
PATCH v3 7/8 hw: acpi: Export and share the ARM RSDP build
In reply to Samuel OrtizNow that build_rsdp() supports building both legacy and current RSDP tables, we can move it to a generic folder (hw/acpi) and have the i386 ACPI code reuse it in order to reduce code duplication.
--- include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h | 2 ++ hw/acpi/aml-build.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 66 ----------------------------------- hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 39 +++++---------------- 4 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h +2 -0
@@ -388,6 +388,8 @@ void acpi_add_table(GArray *table_offsets, GArray *table_data);void acpi_build_tables_init (AcpiBuildTables *tables);void acpi_build_tables_cleanup (AcpiBuildTables *tables,bool mfre);void +build_rsdp (GArray *tbl,BIOSLinker *linker,AcpiRsdpData *rsdp_data); +void build_rsdt (GArray *table_data,BIOSLinker *linker,GArray *table_offsets,const char *oem_id,const char *oem_table_id);void
hw/acpi/aml-build.c +68 -0
74 lines not on this page · raw message
hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c +0 -66
72 lines not on this page · raw message
hw/i386/acpi-build.c +9 -30
@@ -2547,35 +2547,6 @@ build_amd_iommu(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker) "IVRS", table_data->len - iommu_start, 1, NULL, NULL); } -static void -build_rsdp (GArray *rsdp_table,BIOSLinker *linker,unsigned rsdt_tbl_offset) -{ -/* AcpiRsdpDescriptor describes revision 2 RSDP table and as result we -* allocate extra 16 bytes for pc/q35 RSDP rev1 as well. Keep extra 16 bytes -* wasted to make sure we won't breake migration for machine types older -* than 2.3 due to size mismatch. -*/ -AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp =acpi_data_push (rsdp_table,sizeof *rsdp); -unsigned rsdt_pa_size =sizeof (rsdp->rsdt_physical_address); -unsigned rsdt_pa_offset = - (char *)&rsdp->rsdt_physical_address - rsdp_table->data; - -bios_linker_loader_alloc (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , rsdp_table,16 , - true/* fseg memory */ ); - -memcpy (&rsdp->signature,"RSD PTR " ,8 ); -memcpy (rsdp->oem_id,ACPI_BUILD_APPNAME6 ,6 ); -/* Address to be filled by Guest linker */ -bios_linker_loader_add_pointer (linker, -ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , rsdt_pa_offset, rsdt_pa_size, -ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE , rsdt_tbl_offset); - -/* Checksum to be filled by Guest linker */ -bios_linker_loader_add_checksum (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , - (char *)rsdp - rsdp_table->data,20 /* ACPI rev 1.0 RSDP size */ , - (char *)&rsdp->checksum - rsdp_table->data); -} - typedef struct AcpiBuildState { /* Copy of table in RAM (for patching). */
@@ -2732,7 +2703,15 @@ void acpi_build(AcpiBuildTables *tables, MachineState *machine) slic_oem.id, slic_oem.table_id);/* RSDP is in FSEG memory, so allocate it separately */ -build_rsdp (tables->rsdp, tables->linker, rsdt); + { +AcpiRsdpData rsdp_data = { + .revision =0 , + .oem_id =ACPI_BUILD_APPNAME6 , + .xsdt_tbl_offset =NULL , + .rsdt_tbl_offset = &rsdt, + }; +build_rsdp (tables->rsdp, tables->linker, &rsdp_data); + }/* We'll expose it all to Guest so we want to reduce * chance of size changes.
Signature · 1 line
2.19.2
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 7/8] hw: acpi: Export and share the ARM RSDP build
Quoted 162 lines · On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:00:31 +0100 Samuel Ortiz <[email protected]> wrote:
Now that
build_rsdp()supports building both legacy and current RSDP tables, we can move it to a generic folder (hw/acpi) and have the i386 ACPI code reuse it in order to reduce code duplication.Signed-off-by Samuel Ortiz <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Andrew Jones <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Igor Mammedov <[email protected]>--- include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h | 2 ++ hw/acpi/aml-build.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 66 ----------------------------------- hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 39 +++++---------------- 4 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h +2
-0@@ -388,6 +388,8 @@ void acpi_add_table(GArray *table_offsets, GArray *table_data);void acpi_build_tables_init (AcpiBuildTables *tables);void acpi_build_tables_cleanup (AcpiBuildTables *tables,bool mfre);void +build_rsdp (GArray *tbl,BIOSLinker *linker,AcpiRsdpData *rsdp_data); +void build_rsdt (GArray *table_data,BIOSLinker *linker,GArray *table_offsets,const char *oem_id,const char *oem_table_id);void hw/acpi/aml-build.c +68
-0@@ -1589,6 +1589,74 @@ void acpi_build_tables_cleanup(AcpiBuildTables *tables, bool mfre)g_array_free (tables->vmgenid, mfre); } +/* +* ACPI spec 5.2.5.3 Root System Description Pointer (RSDP). +* (Revision 1.0 or later) +*/ +void +build_rsdp (GArray *tbl,BIOSLinker *linker,AcpiRsdpData *rsdp_data) +{ +int tbl_off = tbl->len;/* Table offset in the RSDP file */ + +switch (rsdp_data->revision) { +case 0 : +/* With ACPI 1.0, we must have an RSDT pointer */ +g_assert (rsdp_data->rsdt_tbl_offset); +break ; +case 2 : +/* With ACPI 2.0+, we must have an XSDT pointer */ +g_assert (rsdp_data->xsdt_tbl_offset); +break ; +default : +/* Only revisions 0 (ACPI 1.0) and 2 (ACPI 2.0+) are valid for RSDP */ +g_assert_not_reached (); + } + +bios_linker_loader_alloc (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , tbl,16 , + true/* fseg memory */ ); + +g_array_append_vals (tbl,"RSD PTR " ,8 );/* Signature */ +build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,1 );/* Checksum */ +g_array_append_vals (tbl, rsdp_data->oem_id,6 );/* OEMID */ +build_append_int_noprefix (tbl, rsdp_data->revision,1 );/* Revision */ +build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,4 );/* RsdtAddress */ +if (rsdp_data->rsdt_tbl_offset) { +/* RSDT address to be filled by guest linker */ +bios_linker_loader_add_pointer (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , + tbl_off +16 ,4 , +ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE , + *rsdp_data->rsdt_tbl_offset); + } + +/* Checksum to be filled by guest linker */ +bios_linker_loader_add_checksum (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , + tbl_off,20 ,/* ACPI rev 1.0 RSDP size */ +8 ); + +if (rsdp_data->revision ==0 ) { +/* ACPI 1.0 RSDP, we're done */ +return ; + } + +build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,36 ,4 );/* Length */ + +/* XSDT address to be filled by guest linker */ +build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,8 );/* XsdtAddress */ +/* We already validated our xsdt pointer */ +bios_linker_loader_add_pointer (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , + tbl_off +24 ,8 , +ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE , + *rsdp_data->xsdt_tbl_offset); + +build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,1 );/* Extended Checksum */ +build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,3 );/* Reserved */ + +/* Extended checksum to be filled by Guest linker */ +bios_linker_loader_add_checksum (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , + tbl_off,36 ,/* ACPI rev 2.0 RSDP size */ +32 ); +} +/* Build rsdt table */ void build_rsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, GArray *table_offsets,hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c +0
-46@@ -366,72 +366,6 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_power_button(Aml *scope)aml_append (scope, dev); } -/* RSDP */ -static void -build_rsdp (GArray *tbl,BIOSLinker *linker,AcpiRsdpData *rsdp_data) -{ - -int tbl_off = tbl->len;/* Table offset in the RSDP file */ - -switch (rsdp_data->revision) { -case 0 : -/* With ACPI 1.0, we must have an RSDT pointer */ -g_assert (rsdp_data->rsdt_tbl_offset); -break ; -case 2 : -/* With ACPI 2.0+, we must have an XSDT pointer */ -g_assert (rsdp_data->xsdt_tbl_offset); -break ; -default : -/* Only revisions 0 (ACPI 1.0) and 2 (ACPI 2.0+) are valid for RSDP */ -g_assert_not_reached (); - } - -bios_linker_loader_alloc (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , tbl,16 , - true/* fseg memory */ ); - -g_array_append_vals (tbl,"RSD PTR " ,8 );/* Signature */ -build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,1 );/* Checksum */ -g_array_append_vals (tbl, rsdp_data->oem_id,6 );/* OEMID */ -build_append_int_noprefix (tbl, rsdp_data->revision,1 );/* Revision */ -build_append_int_noprefix (tbl,0 ,4 );/* RsdtAddress */ -if (rsdp_data->rsdt_tbl_offset) { -/* RSDT address to be filled by guest linker */ -bios_linker_loader_add_pointer (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , - tbl_off +16 ,4 , -ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE , - *rsdp_data->rsdt_tbl_offset); - } - -/* Checksum to be filled by guest linker */ -bios_linker_loader_add_checksum (linker,ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE , - tbl_off,20 ,/* ACPI rev 1.0 RSDP size */ -8 ); - -if (rsdp_data->revision ==0 ) { -/* ACPI 1.0 RSDP, we're done */ -return ; - }
[...]
hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
Quoted 8 lines
hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c +0
-8-static void -build_rsdp (GArray *rsdp_table,BIOSLinker *linker,unsigned rsdt_tbl_offset) -{ -/* AcpiRsdpDescriptor describes revision 2 RSDP table and as result we -* allocate extra 16 bytes for pc/q35 RSDP rev1 as well. Keep extra 16 bytes -* wasted to make sure we won't breake migration for machine types older -* than 2.3 due to size mismatch. -*/
Removing this part here and not moving it somewhere else doesn't look right. [...]
Quoted 6 lines
typedef
struct AcpiBuildState { /* Copy of table in RAM (for patching). */hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c +0
-0@@ -2732,7 +2703,15 @@ void acpi_build(AcpiBuildTables *tables, MachineState *machine) slic_oem.id, slic_oem.table_id);
hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c void acpi_build(AcpiBuildTables *tables, MachineState *machine) · line 2713
Quoted 10 lines
hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c +8
-1/* RSDP is in FSEG memory, so allocate it separately */ -build_rsdp (tables->rsdp, tables->linker, rsdt); + { +AcpiRsdpData rsdp_data = { + .revision =0 , + .oem_id =ACPI_BUILD_APPNAME6 , + .xsdt_tbl_offset =NULL , + .rsdt_tbl_offset = &rsdt, + }; +build_rsdp (tables->rsdp, tables->linker, &rsdp_data);
I'd suggest to keep build_rsdp() clean, move comment above comment and add an extra padding for machine versions 2.2 and older here. See pc_i440fx_2_2_machine_options() we probably can use pcmc->rsdp_in_ram as condition for padding.
And test migration (pingpong) from this QEMU build to 2.2 and 2.3 builds, in case something else was missed.
Quoted 4 lines
hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c +1
-0+ }/* We'll expose it all to Guest so we want to reduce * chance of size changes.
PATCH v3 8/8 hw: acpi: Remove AcpiRsdpDescriptor and fix tests
In reply to Samuel OrtizThe only remaining AcpiRsdpDescriptor users are the ACPI utils for the BIOS table tests.
We remove that dependency and can thus remove the structure itself.
--- include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h | 13 ----------- tests/acpi-utils.h | 4 +++- tests/acpi-utils.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- tests/bios-tables-test.c | 21 +++++++++++++---- tests/vmgenid-test.c | 8 ++++--- 5 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h +0 -13
@@ -40,19 +40,6 @@ enum { ACPI_FADT_F_LOW_POWER_S0_IDLE_CAPABLE, }; -struct AcpiRsdpDescriptor {/* Root System Descriptor Pointer */ -uint64_t signature;/* ACPI signature, contains "RSD PTR " */ -uint8_t checksum;/* To make sum of struct == 0 */ -uint8_t oem_id [6 ];/* OEM identification */ -uint8_t revision;/* Must be 0 for 1.0, 2 for 2.0 */ -uint32_t rsdt_physical_address;/* 32-bit physical address of RSDT */ -uint32_t length;/* XSDT Length in bytes including hdr */ -uint64_t xsdt_physical_address;/* 64-bit physical address of XSDT */ -uint8_t extended_checksum;/* Checksum of entire table */ -uint8_t reserved [3 ];/* Reserved field must be 0 */ -}QEMU_PACKED ; -typedef struct AcpiRsdpDescriptor AcpiRsdpDescriptor ; - typedef struct AcpiRsdpData { uint8_t oem_id[6]; /* OEM identification */ uint8_t revision; /* Must be 0 for 1.0, 2 for 2.0 */
tests/acpi-utils.h +3 -1
@@ -82,6 +82,8 @@ typedef struct {uint8_t acpi_calc_checksum (const uint8_t *data,int len);uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address (void ); -void acpi_parse_rsdp_table (uint32_t addr,AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp_table); +uint32_t acpi_get_rsdt_address (uint8_t *rsdp_table); +uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address (uint8_t *rsdp_table); +void acpi_parse_rsdp_table (uint32_t addr,uint8_t *rsdp_table);#endif /* TEST_ACPI_UTILS_H */
tests/acpi-utils.c +38 -8
52 lines not on this page · raw message
tests/bios-tables-test.c +16 -5
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ typedef struct {const char *machine;const char *variant;uint32_t rsdp_addr; -AcpiRsdpDescriptor rsdp_table; +uint8_t rsdp_table[36 /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP size */ ];AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1 rsdt_table;uint32_t dsdt_addr;uint32_t facs_addr;
@@ -85,19 +85,30 @@ static void test_acpi_rsdp_address(test_data *data)static void test_acpi_rsdp_table (test_data *data) { -AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp_table = &data->rsdp_table; +uint8_t *rsdp_table = data->rsdp_table, revision;uint32_t addr = data->rsdp_addr;acpi_parse_rsdp_table (addr, rsdp_table); + revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */ ]; -/* rsdp checksum is not for the whole table, but for the first 20 bytes */ -g_assert (!acpi_calc_checksum ((uint8_t *)rsdp_table,20 )); +switch (revision) { +case 0 :/* ACPI 1.0 RSDP */ +/* With rev 1, checksum is only for the first 20 bytes */ +g_assert (!acpi_calc_checksum (rsdp_table,20 )); +break ; +case 2 :/* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP */ +/* With revision 2, we have 2 checksums */ +g_assert (!acpi_calc_checksum (rsdp_table,20 )); +g_assert (!acpi_calc_checksum (rsdp_table,36 )); +default : +g_assert_not_reached (); + } }static void test_acpi_rsdt_table (test_data *data) {AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1 *rsdt_table = &data->rsdt_table; -uint32_t addr =le32_to_cpu (data->rsdp_table.rsdt_physical_address); +uint32_t addr =acpi_get_rsdt_address (data->rsdp_table);uint32_t *tables;int tables_nr;uint8_t checksum;
tests/vmgenid-test.c +5 -3
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static uint32_t acpi_find_vgia(void) {uint32_t rsdp_offset;uint32_t guid_offset =0 ; -AcpiRsdpDescriptor rsdp_table; +uint8_t rsdp_table[36 /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP size */ ];uint32_t rsdt, rsdt_table_length;AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1 rsdt_table;size_t tables_nr;
@@ -52,9 +52,11 @@ static uint32_t acpi_find_vgia(void) g_assert_cmphex(rsdp_offset, <, RSDP_ADDR_INVALID); -acpi_parse_rsdp_table (rsdp_offset, &rsdp_table); +acpi_parse_rsdp_table (rsdp_offset, rsdp_table); + + rsdt =acpi_get_rsdt_address (rsdp_table); +g_assert (rsdt); - rsdt =le32_to_cpu (rsdp_table.rsdt_physical_address);/* read the header */ ACPI_READ_TABLE_HEADER (&rsdt_table, rsdt);ACPI_ASSERT_CMP (rsdt_table.signature,"RSDT" );
Signature · 1 line
2.19.2
Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v3 8/8] hw: acpi: Remove AcpiRsdpDescriptor and fix tests
Quoted 5 lines · On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:00:32 +0100 Samuel Ortiz <[email protected]> wrote:
The only remaining AcpiRsdpDescriptor users are the ACPI utils for the BIOS table tests.
We remove that dependency and can thus remove the structure itself.Signed-off-by Samuel Ortiz <[email protected]>
Quoted 178 lines
--- include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h | 13 ----------- tests/acpi-utils.h | 4 +++- tests/acpi-utils.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- tests/bios-tables-test.c | 21 +++++++++++++---- tests/vmgenid-test.c | 8 ++++--- 5 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h +0
-13@@ -40,19 +40,6 @@ enum { ACPI_FADT_F_LOW_POWER_S0_IDLE_CAPABLE, }; -struct AcpiRsdpDescriptor {/* Root System Descriptor Pointer */ -uint64_t signature;/* ACPI signature, contains "RSD PTR " */ -uint8_t checksum;/* To make sum of struct == 0 */ -uint8_t oem_id [6 ];/* OEM identification */ -uint8_t revision;/* Must be 0 for 1.0, 2 for 2.0 */ -uint32_t rsdt_physical_address;/* 32-bit physical address of RSDT */ -uint32_t length;/* XSDT Length in bytes including hdr */ -uint64_t xsdt_physical_address;/* 64-bit physical address of XSDT */ -uint8_t extended_checksum;/* Checksum of entire table */ -uint8_t reserved [3 ];/* Reserved field must be 0 */ -}QEMU_PACKED ; -typedef struct AcpiRsdpDescriptor AcpiRsdpDescriptor ; - typedef struct AcpiRsdpData { uint8_t oem_id[6]; /* OEM identification */ uint8_t revision; /* Must be 0 for 1.0, 2 for 2.0 */tests/acpi-utils.h +3
-1@@ -82,6 +82,8 @@ typedef struct {uint8_t acpi_calc_checksum (const uint8_t *data,int len);uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address (void ); -void acpi_parse_rsdp_table (uint32_t addr,AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp_table); +uint32_t acpi_get_rsdt_address (uint8_t *rsdp_table); +uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address (uint8_t *rsdp_table); +void acpi_parse_rsdp_table (uint32_t addr,uint8_t *rsdp_table);#endif /* TEST_ACPI_UTILS_H */ tests/acpi-utils.c +38
-8@@ -52,14 +52,44 @@ uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(void)return off; } -void acpi_parse_rsdp_table (uint32_t addr,AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp_table) +uint32_t acpi_get_rsdt_address (uint8_t *rsdp_table) { -ACPI_READ_FIELD (rsdp_table->signature, addr); -ACPI_ASSERT_CMP64 (rsdp_table->signature,"RSD PTR " ); +uint32_t rsdt_physical_address; -ACPI_READ_FIELD (rsdp_table->checksum, addr); -ACPI_READ_ARRAY (rsdp_table->oem_id, addr); -ACPI_READ_FIELD (rsdp_table->revision, addr); -ACPI_READ_FIELD (rsdp_table->rsdt_physical_address, addr); -ACPI_READ_FIELD (rsdp_table->length, addr); +memcpy (&rsdt_physical_address, &rsdp_table[16 /* RsdtAddress offset */ ],4 ); +return le32_to_cpu (rsdt_physical_address); +} + +uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address (uint8_t *rsdp_table) +{ +uint64_t xsdt_physical_address; +uint8_t revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */ ]; + +/* We must have revision 2 if we're looking for an XSDT pointer */ +g_assert (revision ==2 ); + +memcpy (&xsdt_physical_address, &rsdp_table[24 /* XsdtAddress offset */ ],8 ); +return le64_to_cpu (xsdt_physical_address); +} + +void acpi_parse_rsdp_table (uint32_t addr,uint8_t *rsdp_table) +{ +uint8_t revision; + +/* Read mandatory revision 0 table data (20 bytes) first */ +memread (addr, rsdp_table,20 ); + revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */ ]; + +switch (revision) { +case 0 :/* ACPI 1.0 RSDP */ +break ; +case 2 :/* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP */ +/* Read the rest of the RSDP table */ +memread (addr +20 , rsdp_table +20 ,16 ); +break ; +default : +g_assert_not_reached (); + } + +ACPI_ASSERT_CMP64 (*((uint64_t *)(rsdp_table)),"RSD PTR " ); }tests/bios-tables-test.c +16
-5@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ typedef struct {const char *machine;const char *variant;uint32_t rsdp_addr; -AcpiRsdpDescriptor rsdp_table; +uint8_t rsdp_table[36 /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP size */ ];AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1 rsdt_table;uint32_t dsdt_addr;uint32_t facs_addr;@@ -85,19 +85,30 @@ static void test_acpi_rsdp_address(test_data *data)static void test_acpi_rsdp_table (test_data *data) { -AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp_table = &data->rsdp_table; +uint8_t *rsdp_table = data->rsdp_table, revision;uint32_t addr = data->rsdp_addr;acpi_parse_rsdp_table (addr, rsdp_table); + revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */ ]; -/* rsdp checksum is not for the whole table, but for the first 20 bytes */ -g_assert (!acpi_calc_checksum ((uint8_t *)rsdp_table,20 )); +switch (revision) { +case 0 :/* ACPI 1.0 RSDP */ +/* With rev 1, checksum is only for the first 20 bytes */ +g_assert (!acpi_calc_checksum (rsdp_table,20 )); +break ; +case 2 :/* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP */ +/* With revision 2, we have 2 checksums */ +g_assert (!acpi_calc_checksum (rsdp_table,20 )); +g_assert (!acpi_calc_checksum (rsdp_table,36 )); +default : +g_assert_not_reached (); + } }static void test_acpi_rsdt_table (test_data *data) {AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1 *rsdt_table = &data->rsdt_table; -uint32_t addr =le32_to_cpu (data->rsdp_table.rsdt_physical_address); +uint32_t addr =acpi_get_rsdt_address (data->rsdp_table);uint32_t *tables;int tables_nr;uint8_t checksum;tests/vmgenid-test.c +5
-3@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static uint32_t acpi_find_vgia(void) {uint32_t rsdp_offset;uint32_t guid_offset =0 ; -AcpiRsdpDescriptor rsdp_table; +uint8_t rsdp_table[36 /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP size */ ];uint32_t rsdt, rsdt_table_length;AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1 rsdt_table;size_t tables_nr;@@ -52,9 +52,11 @@ static uint32_t acpi_find_vgia(void) g_assert_cmphex(rsdp_offset, <, RSDP_ADDR_INVALID); -acpi_parse_rsdp_table (rsdp_offset, &rsdp_table); +acpi_parse_rsdp_table (rsdp_offset, rsdp_table); + + rsdt =acpi_get_rsdt_address (rsdp_table); +g_assert (rsdt); - rsdt =le32_to_cpu (rsdp_table.rsdt_physical_address);/* read the header */ ACPI_READ_TABLE_HEADER (&rsdt_table, rsdt);ACPI_ASSERT_CMP (rsdt_table.signature,"RSDT" );
Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 8/8] hw: acpi: Remove AcpiRsdpDescriptor and fix tests
In reply to Samuel OrtizQuoted 133 lines · Samuel Ortiz
The only remaining AcpiRsdpDescriptor users are the ACPI utils for the BIOS table tests.
We remove that dependency and can thus remove the structure itself.Signed-off-by Samuel Ortiz <[email protected]>--- include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h | 13 ----------- tests/acpi-utils.h | 4 +++- tests/acpi-utils.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- tests/bios-tables-test.c | 21 +++++++++++++---- tests/vmgenid-test.c | 8 ++++--- 5 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h +0
-13@@ -40,19 +40,6 @@ enum { ACPI_FADT_F_LOW_POWER_S0_IDLE_CAPABLE, }; -struct AcpiRsdpDescriptor {/* Root System Descriptor Pointer */ -uint64_t signature;/* ACPI signature, contains "RSD PTR " */ -uint8_t checksum;/* To make sum of struct == 0 */ -uint8_t oem_id [6 ];/* OEM identification */ -uint8_t revision;/* Must be 0 for 1.0, 2 for 2.0 */ -uint32_t rsdt_physical_address;/* 32-bit physical address of RSDT */ -uint32_t length;/* XSDT Length in bytes including hdr */ -uint64_t xsdt_physical_address;/* 64-bit physical address of XSDT */ -uint8_t extended_checksum;/* Checksum of entire table */ -uint8_t reserved [3 ];/* Reserved field must be 0 */ -}QEMU_PACKED ; -typedef struct AcpiRsdpDescriptor AcpiRsdpDescriptor ; - typedef struct AcpiRsdpData { uint8_t oem_id[6]; /* OEM identification */ uint8_t revision; /* Must be 0 for 1.0, 2 for 2.0 */tests/acpi-utils.h +3
-1@@ -82,6 +82,8 @@ typedef struct {uint8_t acpi_calc_checksum (const uint8_t *data,int len);uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address (void ); -void acpi_parse_rsdp_table (uint32_t addr,AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp_table); +uint32_t acpi_get_rsdt_address (uint8_t *rsdp_table); +uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address (uint8_t *rsdp_table); +void acpi_parse_rsdp_table (uint32_t addr,uint8_t *rsdp_table);#endif /* TEST_ACPI_UTILS_H */ tests/acpi-utils.c +38
-8@@ -52,14 +52,44 @@ uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(void)return off; } -void acpi_parse_rsdp_table (uint32_t addr,AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp_table) +uint32_t acpi_get_rsdt_address (uint8_t *rsdp_table) { -ACPI_READ_FIELD (rsdp_table->signature, addr); -ACPI_ASSERT_CMP64 (rsdp_table->signature,"RSD PTR " ); +uint32_t rsdt_physical_address; -ACPI_READ_FIELD (rsdp_table->checksum, addr); -ACPI_READ_ARRAY (rsdp_table->oem_id, addr); -ACPI_READ_FIELD (rsdp_table->revision, addr); -ACPI_READ_FIELD (rsdp_table->rsdt_physical_address, addr); -ACPI_READ_FIELD (rsdp_table->length, addr); +memcpy (&rsdt_physical_address, &rsdp_table[16 /* RsdtAddress offset */ ],4 ); +return le32_to_cpu (rsdt_physical_address); +} + +uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address (uint8_t *rsdp_table) +{ +uint64_t xsdt_physical_address; +uint8_t revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */ ]; + +/* We must have revision 2 if we're looking for an XSDT pointer */ +g_assert (revision ==2 ); + +memcpy (&xsdt_physical_address, &rsdp_table[24 /* XsdtAddress offset */ ],8 ); +return le64_to_cpu (xsdt_physical_address); +} + +void acpi_parse_rsdp_table (uint32_t addr,uint8_t *rsdp_table) +{ +uint8_t revision; + +/* Read mandatory revision 0 table data (20 bytes) first */ +memread (addr, rsdp_table,20 ); + revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */ ]; + +switch (revision) { +case 0 :/* ACPI 1.0 RSDP */ +break ; +case 2 :/* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP */ +/* Read the rest of the RSDP table */ +memread (addr +20 , rsdp_table +20 ,16 ); +break ; +default : +g_assert_not_reached (); + } + +ACPI_ASSERT_CMP64 (*((uint64_t *)(rsdp_table)),"RSD PTR " ); }tests/bios-tables-test.c +3
-3@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ typedef struct {const char *machine;const char *variant;uint32_t rsdp_addr; -AcpiRsdpDescriptor rsdp_table; +uint8_t rsdp_table[36 /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP size */ ];AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1 rsdt_table;uint32_t dsdt_addr;uint32_t facs_addr;@@ -85,19 +85,30 @@ static void test_acpi_rsdp_address(test_data *data)static void test_acpi_rsdp_table (test_data *data) { -AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp_table = &data->rsdp_table; +uint8_t *rsdp_table = data->rsdp_table, revision;uint32_t addr = data->rsdp_addr;acpi_parse_rsdp_table (addr, rsdp_table); + revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */ ]; -/* rsdp checksum is not for the whole table, but for the first 20 bytes */
tests/bios-tables-test.c static void test_acpi_rsdp_address(test_data *data) · line 102
Quoted 10 lines
tests/bios-tables-test.c +9
-1-g_assert (!acpi_calc_checksum ((uint8_t *)rsdp_table,20 )); +switch (revision) { +case 0 :/* ACPI 1.0 RSDP */ +/* With rev 1, checksum is only for the first 20 bytes */ +g_assert (!acpi_calc_checksum (rsdp_table,20 )); +break ; +case 2 :/* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP */ +/* With revision 2, we have 2 checksums */ +g_assert (!acpi_calc_checksum (rsdp_table,20 )); +g_assert (!acpi_calc_checksum (rsdp_table,36 ));
Missing break. I guess this wasn't yet tested with ACPI 2.0+? Are we going to extend the tests to do that?
Quoted 44 lines
tests/bios-tables-test.c +4
-1+default : +g_assert_not_reached (); + } }static void test_acpi_rsdt_table (test_data *data) {AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1 *rsdt_table = &data->rsdt_table; -uint32_t addr =le32_to_cpu (data->rsdp_table.rsdt_physical_address); +uint32_t addr =acpi_get_rsdt_address (data->rsdp_table);uint32_t *tables;int tables_nr;uint8_t checksum;tests/vmgenid-test.c +5
-3@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static uint32_t acpi_find_vgia(void) {uint32_t rsdp_offset;uint32_t guid_offset =0 ; -AcpiRsdpDescriptor rsdp_table; +uint8_t rsdp_table[36 /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP size */ ];uint32_t rsdt, rsdt_table_length;AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1 rsdt_table;size_t tables_nr;@@ -52,9 +52,11 @@ static uint32_t acpi_find_vgia(void) g_assert_cmphex(rsdp_offset, <, RSDP_ADDR_INVALID); -acpi_parse_rsdp_table (rsdp_offset, &rsdp_table); +acpi_parse_rsdp_table (rsdp_offset, rsdp_table); + + rsdt =acpi_get_rsdt_address (rsdp_table); +g_assert (rsdt); - rsdt =le32_to_cpu (rsdp_table.rsdt_physical_address);/* read the header */ ACPI_READ_TABLE_HEADER (&rsdt_table, rsdt);ACPI_ASSERT_CMP (rsdt_table.signature,"RSDT" );Signature · 1 line
2.19.2
Besides the missing break
Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 8/8] hw: acpi: Remove AcpiRsdpDescriptor and fix tests
Quoted 133 lines · On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 16:10:52 +0100 Andrew Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 132 lines · Samuel Ortiz
The only remaining AcpiRsdpDescriptor users are the ACPI utils for the BIOS table tests.
We remove that dependency and can thus remove the structure itself.Signed-off-by Samuel Ortiz <[email protected]>--- include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h | 13 ----------- tests/acpi-utils.h | 4 +++- tests/acpi-utils.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- tests/bios-tables-test.c | 21 +++++++++++++---- tests/vmgenid-test.c | 8 ++++--- 5 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h +0
-13@@ -40,19 +40,6 @@ enum { ACPI_FADT_F_LOW_POWER_S0_IDLE_CAPABLE, }; -struct AcpiRsdpDescriptor {/* Root System Descriptor Pointer */ -uint64_t signature;/* ACPI signature, contains "RSD PTR " */ -uint8_t checksum;/* To make sum of struct == 0 */ -uint8_t oem_id [6 ];/* OEM identification */ -uint8_t revision;/* Must be 0 for 1.0, 2 for 2.0 */ -uint32_t rsdt_physical_address;/* 32-bit physical address of RSDT */ -uint32_t length;/* XSDT Length in bytes including hdr */ -uint64_t xsdt_physical_address;/* 64-bit physical address of XSDT */ -uint8_t extended_checksum;/* Checksum of entire table */ -uint8_t reserved [3 ];/* Reserved field must be 0 */ -}QEMU_PACKED ; -typedef struct AcpiRsdpDescriptor AcpiRsdpDescriptor ; - typedef struct AcpiRsdpData { uint8_t oem_id[6]; /* OEM identification */ uint8_t revision; /* Must be 0 for 1.0, 2 for 2.0 */tests/acpi-utils.h +3
-1@@ -82,6 +82,8 @@ typedef struct {uint8_t acpi_calc_checksum (const uint8_t *data,int len);uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address (void ); -void acpi_parse_rsdp_table (uint32_t addr,AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp_table); +uint32_t acpi_get_rsdt_address (uint8_t *rsdp_table); +uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address (uint8_t *rsdp_table); +void acpi_parse_rsdp_table (uint32_t addr,uint8_t *rsdp_table);#endif /* TEST_ACPI_UTILS_H */ tests/acpi-utils.c +38
-8@@ -52,14 +52,44 @@ uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(void)return off; } -void acpi_parse_rsdp_table (uint32_t addr,AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp_table) +uint32_t acpi_get_rsdt_address (uint8_t *rsdp_table) { -ACPI_READ_FIELD (rsdp_table->signature, addr); -ACPI_ASSERT_CMP64 (rsdp_table->signature,"RSD PTR " ); +uint32_t rsdt_physical_address; -ACPI_READ_FIELD (rsdp_table->checksum, addr); -ACPI_READ_ARRAY (rsdp_table->oem_id, addr); -ACPI_READ_FIELD (rsdp_table->revision, addr); -ACPI_READ_FIELD (rsdp_table->rsdt_physical_address, addr); -ACPI_READ_FIELD (rsdp_table->length, addr); +memcpy (&rsdt_physical_address, &rsdp_table[16 /* RsdtAddress offset */ ],4 ); +return le32_to_cpu (rsdt_physical_address); +} + +uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address (uint8_t *rsdp_table) +{ +uint64_t xsdt_physical_address; +uint8_t revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */ ]; + +/* We must have revision 2 if we're looking for an XSDT pointer */ +g_assert (revision ==2 ); + +memcpy (&xsdt_physical_address, &rsdp_table[24 /* XsdtAddress offset */ ],8 ); +return le64_to_cpu (xsdt_physical_address); +} + +void acpi_parse_rsdp_table (uint32_t addr,uint8_t *rsdp_table) +{ +uint8_t revision; + +/* Read mandatory revision 0 table data (20 bytes) first */ +memread (addr, rsdp_table,20 ); + revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */ ]; + +switch (revision) { +case 0 :/* ACPI 1.0 RSDP */ +break ; +case 2 :/* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP */ +/* Read the rest of the RSDP table */ +memread (addr +20 , rsdp_table +20 ,16 ); +break ; +default : +g_assert_not_reached (); + } + +ACPI_ASSERT_CMP64 (*((uint64_t *)(rsdp_table)),"RSD PTR " ); }tests/bios-tables-test.c +3
-2@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ typedef struct {const char *machine;const char *variant;uint32_t rsdp_addr; -AcpiRsdpDescriptor rsdp_table; +uint8_t rsdp_table[36 /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP size */ ];AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1 rsdt_table;uint32_t dsdt_addr;uint32_t facs_addr;@@ -85,19 +85,30 @@ static void test_acpi_rsdp_address(test_data *data)static void test_acpi_rsdp_table (test_data *data) { -AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp_table = &data->rsdp_table; +uint8_t *rsdp_table = data->rsdp_table, revision;uint32_t addr = data->rsdp_addr;acpi_parse_rsdp_table (addr, rsdp_table); + revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */ ];
Quoted 14 lines
tests/bios-tables-test.c static void test_acpi_rsdp_address(test_data *data) · line 102
Quoted 11 lines
tests/bios-tables-test.c +9
-2-/* rsdp checksum is not for the whole table, but for the first 20 bytes */ -g_assert (!acpi_calc_checksum ((uint8_t *)rsdp_table,20 )); +switch (revision) { +case 0 :/* ACPI 1.0 RSDP */ +/* With rev 1, checksum is only for the first 20 bytes */ +g_assert (!acpi_calc_checksum (rsdp_table,20 )); +break ; +case 2 :/* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP */ +/* With revision 2, we have 2 checksums */ +g_assert (!acpi_calc_checksum (rsdp_table,20 )); +g_assert (!acpi_calc_checksum (rsdp_table,36 ));Missing break. I guess this wasn't yet tested with ACPI 2.0+? Are we going to extend the tests to do that?
I'm working on adding arm/virt board to these tests, so that will use this 2.0 path
Quoted 50 lines
Quoted 45 lines
tests/bios-tables-test.c +4
-1+default : +g_assert_not_reached (); + } }static void test_acpi_rsdt_table (test_data *data) {AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1 *rsdt_table = &data->rsdt_table; -uint32_t addr =le32_to_cpu (data->rsdp_table.rsdt_physical_address); +uint32_t addr =acpi_get_rsdt_address (data->rsdp_table);uint32_t *tables;int tables_nr;uint8_t checksum;tests/vmgenid-test.c +5
-3@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static uint32_t acpi_find_vgia(void) {uint32_t rsdp_offset;uint32_t guid_offset =0 ; -AcpiRsdpDescriptor rsdp_table; +uint8_t rsdp_table[36 /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP size */ ];uint32_t rsdt, rsdt_table_length;AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1 rsdt_table;size_t tables_nr;@@ -52,9 +52,11 @@ static uint32_t acpi_find_vgia(void) g_assert_cmphex(rsdp_offset, <, RSDP_ADDR_INVALID); -acpi_parse_rsdp_table (rsdp_offset, &rsdp_table); +acpi_parse_rsdp_table (rsdp_offset, rsdp_table); + + rsdt =acpi_get_rsdt_address (rsdp_table); +g_assert (rsdt); - rsdt =le32_to_cpu (rsdp_table.rsdt_physical_address);/* read the header */ ACPI_READ_TABLE_HEADER (&rsdt_table, rsdt);ACPI_ASSERT_CMP (rsdt_table.signature,"RSDT" );Signature · 1 line
2.19.2Besides the missing break
Reviewed-by Andrew Jones <[email protected]>