sideband: color lines with keyword only
PATCH 1/1 sideband: color lines with keyword only
When bf1a11f0a1 (sideband: highlight keywords in remote sideband output, 2018-08-07) was introduced, it was carefully considered which strings would be highlighted. However 59a255aef0 (sideband: do not read beyond the end of input, 2018-08-18) brought in a regression that the original did not test for. A line containing only the keyword and nothing else ("SUCCESS") should still be colored.
--- sideband.c | 5 +++-- t/t5409-colorize-remote-messages.sh | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
sideband.c +3 -2
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static void maybe_colorize_sideband(struct strbuf *dest, const char *src, int n)struct keyword_entry *p = keywords + i;int len =strlen (p->keyword); -if (n <= len) +if (n < len)continue ;/* * Match case insensitively, so we colorize output from existing
@@ -95,7 +95,8 @@ static void maybe_colorize_sideband(struct strbuf *dest, const char *src, int n)* messages. We only highlight the word precisely, so * "successful" stays uncolored. */ -if (!strncasecmp (p->keyword, src, len) && !isalnum (src[len])) { +if (!strncasecmp (p->keyword, src, len) && + (len == n || !isalnum (src[len]))) {strbuf_addstr (dest, p->color);strbuf_add (dest, src, len);strbuf_addstr (dest,GIT_COLOR_RESET );
t/t5409-colorize-remote-messages.sh +2 -0
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup' ' echo " " "error: leading space" echo " " echo Err + echo SUCCESS exit 0 EOF echo 1 >file &&
@@ -35,6 +36,7 @@ test_expect_success 'keywords' ' grep "<BOLD;RED>error<RESET>: error" decoded && grep "<YELLOW>hint<RESET>:" decoded && grep "<BOLD;GREEN>success<RESET>:" decoded && + grep "<BOLD;GREEN>SUCCESS<RESET>" decoded && grep "<BOLD;YELLOW>warning<RESET>:" decoded '
Signature · 1 line
2.20.0.rc2.403.gdbc3b29805-goog
Hi,
Quoted 7 lines · Stefan Beller
When
bf1a11f0a1(sideband: highlight keywords in remote sideband output, 2018-08-07) was introduced, it was carefully considered which strings would be highlighted. However59a255aef0(sideband: do not read beyond the end of input, 2018-08-18) brought in a regression that the original did not test for. A line containing only the keyword and nothing else ("SUCCESS") should still be colored.
Quoted 5 lines
Signed-off-by Stefan Beller <[email protected]>--- sideband.c | 5 +++-- t/t5409-colorize-remote-messages.sh | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Thanks for writing this.
I was curious about what versions of Gerrit this is designed to support (or in other words whether it's a bug fix or a feature). Looking at examples like [1], it seems that Gerrit historically always used "ERROR:" so the 59a255aef0 logic would work for it. More recently, [2] (ReceiveCommits: add a "SUCCESS" marker for successful change updates, 2018-08-21) put SUCCESS on a line of its own. That puts this squarely in the new-feature category.
"success" on its own line is even less likely to be a false positive than "success" followed by punctuation (for example a period marking the end of a sentence). So I like this change.
[1] https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/gerrit/+/22361
[2] https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/gerrit/+/193570
sideband.c static void maybe_colorize_sideband(struct strbuf *dest, const char *src, int n) · line 91
Quoted 11 lines
sideband.c +1
-1@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static void maybe_colorize_sideband(struct strbuf *dest, const char *src, int n)struct keyword_entry *p = keywords + i;int len =strlen (p->keyword); -if (n <= len) +if (n < len)continue ;
In the old code, we would escape early if 'n == len', but we didn't need to. If 'n == len', then
src[len] == '\0' src .. &src[len-1] is a valid buffer to read from
so the strncasecmp and strbuf_add operations used in this function are valid. Good.
sideband.c static void maybe_colorize_sideband(struct strbuf *dest, const char *src, int n) · line 99
Quoted 9 lines
sideband.c +2
-1/* * Match case insensitively, so we colorize output from existing @@ -95,7 +95,8 @@ static void maybe_colorize_sideband(struct strbuf *dest, const char *src, int n)* messages. We only highlight the word precisely, so * "successful" stays uncolored. */ -if (!strncasecmp (p->keyword, src, len) && !isalnum (src[len])) { +if (!strncasecmp (p->keyword, src, len) && + (len == n || !isalnum (src[len]))) {
Our custom isalnum treats '\0' as not alphanumeric (sane_ctype[0] == GIT_CNTRL) so this part of the patch is unnecessary. That said, it's good for clarity and defensive programming.
Quoted 16 lines
sideband.c +0
-0strbuf_addstr (dest, p->color);strbuf_add (dest, src, len);strbuf_addstr (dest,GIT_COLOR_RESET );t/t5409-colorize-remote-messages.sh +1
-0@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup' ' echo " " "error: leading space" echo " " echo Err + echo SUCCESS exit 0 EOF echo 1 >file &&
t/t5409-colorize-remote-messages.sh test_expect_success 'keywords' ' · line 41
Quoted 6 lines
t/t5409-colorize-remote-messages.sh +1
-0@@ -35,6 +36,7 @@ test_expect_success 'keywords' ' grep "<BOLD;RED>error<RESET>: error" decoded && grep "<YELLOW>hint<RESET>:" decoded && grep "<BOLD;GREEN>success<RESET>:" decoded && + grep "<BOLD;GREEN>SUCCESS<RESET>" decoded && grep "<BOLD;YELLOW>warning<RESET>:" decoded '
Nice tests.
The "hinting: not highlighted" example shows that we aren't introducing false positives here, so the coverage seems sufficient. It might be nice to include a line
echo ERROR:
as well to match another idiom that Gerrit sometimes uses.
Thanks again for a pleasant read.
Quoted 15 lines · Jonathan Nieder
sideband.c static void maybe_colorize_sideband(struct strbuf *dest, const char *src, int n) · line 99
Quoted 9 lines · Stefan Beller
sideband.c +2
-1/* * Match case insensitively, so we colorize output from existing @@ -95,7 +95,8 @@ static void maybe_colorize_sideband(struct strbuf *dest, const char *src, int n)* messages. We only highlight the word precisely, so * "successful" stays uncolored. */ -if (!strncasecmp (p->keyword, src, len) && !isalnum (src[len])) { +if (!strncasecmp (p->keyword, src, len) && + (len == n || !isalnum (src[len]))) {Our custom isalnum treats '\0' as not alphanumeric (sane_ctype[0] ==
GIT_CNTRL) so this part of the patch is unnecessary. That said, it's good for clarity and defensive programming.
Correction: I am being silly here. src[len] can be '\0', '\n', or '\r' --- it's not always '\0'. And the contract of this function is that src[len] could be anything. Thanks for having handled it correctly. :)
Jonathan
Quoted 7 lines · Jonathan Nieder
I was curious about what versions of Gerrit this is designed to support (or in other words whether it's a bug fix or a feature). Looking at examples like [1], it seems that Gerrit historically always used "ERROR:" so the
59a255aef0logic would work for it. More recently, [2] (ReceiveCommits: add a "SUCCESS" marker for successful change updates, 2018-08-21) put SUCCESS on a line of its own. That puts this squarely in the new-feature category.
Ooops. From the internal bug, I assumed this to be long standing Gerrit behavior, which is why I sent it out in -rc to begin with.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
sideband.c +0
-0@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static void maybe_colorize_sideband(struct strbuf *dest, const char *src, int n)struct keyword_entry *p = keywords + i;int len =strlen (p->keyword);
Quoted 8 lines
sideband.c static void maybe_colorize_sideband(struct strbuf *dest, const char *src, int n) · line 91
Quoted 3 lines
sideband.c +1
-1-if (n <= len) +if (n < len)continue ;In the old code, we would escape early if 'n == len', but we didn't need to. If 'n == len', then
src[len] == '\0'
src[len] could also be one of "\n\r", see the caller recv_sideband for sidebase case 2.
Quoted 4 lines
src .. &src[len-1] is a valid buffer to read from
so the strncasecmp and
strbuf_addoperations used in this function are valid. Good.
Yes, they are all valid...
Quoted 7 lines
sideband.c static void maybe_colorize_sideband(struct strbuf *dest, const char *src, int n) · line 99
Quoted 3 lines
sideband.c +2
-1-if (!strncasecmp (p->keyword, src, len) && !isalnum (src[len])) { +if (!strncasecmp (p->keyword, src, len) && + (len == n || !isalnum (src[len]))) {Our custom isalnum treats '\0' as not alphanumeric (sane_ctype[0] ==
GIT_CNTRL) so this part of the patch is unnecessary. That said, it's good for clarity and defensive programming.
... but here we need to check for src[len] for validity.
I made no assumptions about isalnum, but rather needed to shortcut the condition, as accessing src[len] would be out of bounds, no?
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
strbuf_addstr(dest, p->color); strbuf_add(dest, src, len);
unlike here (or the rest of the block), where len is used correctly.
Quoted 10 lines · Stefan Beller
Quoted 7 lines · Jonathan Nieder
I was curious about what versions of Gerrit this is designed to support (or in other words whether it's a bug fix or a feature). Looking at examples like [1], it seems that Gerrit historically always used "ERROR:" so the
59a255aef0logic would work for it. More recently, [2] (ReceiveCommits: add a "SUCCESS" marker for successful change updates, 2018-08-21) put SUCCESS on a line of its own. That puts this squarely in the new-feature category.
Quoted 2 lines
Ooops. From the internal bug, I assumed this to be long standing Gerrit behavior, which is why I sent it out in -rc to begin with.
No worries. Can't hurt for Junio to have a few patches to apply to "pu" or "next" to practice using the release candidates. :)
[...]
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
In the old code, we would escape early if 'n == len', but we didn't need to. If 'n == len', then
src[len] == '\0'src[len] could also be one of "\n\r", see the caller
recv_sidebandfor sidebase case 2.
Yes, I noticed too late[*]. Sorry for the noise.
The patch still looks good.
Jonathan
Quoted 5 lines · Jonathan Nieder
Quoted 4 lines · Stefan Beller
Quoted 2 lines · Jonathan Nieder
I was curious about what versions of Gerrit this is designed to support (or in other words whether it's a bug fix or a feature).
Well, bf1a11f0 ("sideband: highlight keywords in remote sideband output", 2018-08-07) clearly wanted to allow a keyword followed by anything !isalnum() to be painted, and we accepted that change because we thought it was a good idea, so anything that made a keyword alone not to be painted is a bug, isn't it? Whether output lines from Gerrit benefits from this fix is a different matter, of course.
Quoted 2 lines
No worries. Can't hurt for Junio to have a few patches to apply to "pu" or "next" to practice using the release candidates. :)
This change falls into "an obvious and small fix to a bug that went unnoticed and is in an older release (2.19)" category, which is not eligible for the upcoming release this late in the cycle. I think enough eyeballs looked at the change already, so let's not waste the already-spent review braincycle and mark it as "Will merge to 'next'".
Quoted 6 lines · Jonathan Nieder
Quoted 6 lines
When
bf1a11f0a1(sideband: highlight keywords in remote sideband output, 2018-08-07) was introduced, it was carefully considered which strings would be highlighted. However59a255aef0(sideband: do not read beyond the end of input, 2018-08-18) brought in a regression that the original did not test for. A line containing only the keyword and nothing else ("SUCCESS") should still be colored.
I had intended SUCCESS on a line of its to be highlighted too, and some earlier versions of my patch did that, but it regressed as the patch was reworked. The SUCCESS on a line of its own is a recent behavior of Gerrit, and is live in Gerrit 2.16.
--
Google Germany GmbH, Erika-Mann-Strasse 33, 80636 Munich
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado