Skip to contentSkip to conversation

malloc: notify primary process about hotplug in secondary

PATCH In review Seth Howell 3 participants 6 messages Dec 4, 2018 – Dec 20, 2018

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 malloc: notify primary process about hotplug in secondary

When secondary process hotplugs memory, it sends a request to primary, which then performs the real mmap() and sends sync requests to all secondary processes. Upon receiving such sync request, each secondary process will notify the upper layers of hotplugged memory (and will call all locally registered event callbacks).

In the end we'll end up with memory event callbacks fired in all the processes except the primary, which is a bug.

This gets critical if memory is hotplugged while a VFIO device is attached, as the VFIO memory registration - which is done from a memory event callback present in the primary process only - is never called.

After this patch, a primary process fires memory event callbacks before secondary processes start their synchronizations - both for hotplug and hotremove.

Change-Id I60de33913f58bc2454069c3844826c92cb043fff
---
 lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_mp.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_mp.c +8 -0
index 5f2d4e0be..f3a13353b 100644
@@ -209,6 +209,8 @@ handle_alloc_request(const struct malloc_mp_req *m,
 
 	map_addr = ms[0]->addr;
 
+	eal_memalloc_mem_event_notify(RTE_MEM_EVENT_ALLOC, map_addr, alloc_sz);
+
 	/* we have succeeded in allocating memory, but we still need to sync
 	 * with other processes. however, since DPDK IPC is single-threaded, we
 	 * send an asynchronous request and exit this callback.
@@ -258,6 +260,9 @@ handle_request(const struct rte_mp_msg *msg, const void *peer __rte_unused)
 	if (m->t == REQ_TYPE_ALLOC) {
 		ret = handle_alloc_request(m, entry);
 	} else if (m->t == REQ_TYPE_FREE) {
+		eal_memalloc_mem_event_notify(RTE_MEM_EVENT_FREE,
+				m->free_req.addr, m->free_req.len);
+
 		ret = malloc_heap_free_pages(m->free_req.addr,
 				m->free_req.len);
 	} else {
@@ -436,6 +441,9 @@ handle_sync_response(const struct rte_mp_msg *request,
 		memset(&rb_msg, 0, sizeof(rb_msg));
 
 		/* we've failed to sync, so do a rollback */
+		eal_memalloc_mem_event_notify(RTE_MEM_EVENT_FREE,
+				state->map_addr, state->map_len);
+
 		rollback_expand_heap(state->ms, state->ms_len, state->elem,
 				state->map_addr, state->map_len);
 
Signature · 1 line
2.17.2
Reviewed-by on v1 1/1
#1 lore raw
Quoted 15 lines · Seth Howell

When secondary process hotplugs memory, it sends a request to primary, which then performs the real mmap() and sends sync requests to all secondary processes. Upon receiving such sync request, each secondary process will notify the upper layers of hotplugged memory (and will call all locally registered event callbacks).

In the end we'll end up with memory event callbacks fired in all the processes except the primary, which is a bug.

This gets critical if memory is hotplugged while a VFIO device is attached, as the VFIO memory registration - which is done from a memory event callback present in the primary process only - is never called.

Quoted 5 lines

After this patch, a primary process fires memory event callbacks before secondary processes start their synchronizations - both for hotplug and hotremove.

Change-Id: I60de33913f58bc2454069c3844826c92cb043fff

This is internal tag, please don't include it in the patch. Also, misses Fixes: tag, and Cc: [email protected] (since this bug goes back to 18.05).

Quoted 3 lines

---

Otherwise,

Signature · 2 lines
Thanks,
Anatoly
#2 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 malloc: notify primary process about hotplug in secondary

In reply to Seth Howell

When secondary process hotplugs memory, it sends a request to primary, which then performs the real mmap() and sends sync requests to all secondary processes. Upon receiving such sync request, each secondary process will notify the upper layers of hotplugged memory (and will call all locally registered event callbacks).

In the end we'll end up with memory event callbacks fired in all the processes except the primary, which is a bug.

This gets critical if memory is hotplugged while a VFIO device is attached, as the VFIO memory registration - which is done from a memory event callback present in the primary process only - is never called.

After this patch, a primary process fires memory event callbacks before secondary processes start their synchronizations - both for hotplug and hotremove.

Fixes 07dcbfe0101f ("malloc: support multiprocess memory hotplug")
---
 lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_mp.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_mp.c +8 -0
index 5f2d4e0be..f3a13353b 100644
@@ -209,6 +209,8 @@ handle_alloc_request(const struct malloc_mp_req *m,
 
 	map_addr = ms[0]->addr;
 
+	eal_memalloc_mem_event_notify(RTE_MEM_EVENT_ALLOC, map_addr, alloc_sz);
+
 	/* we have succeeded in allocating memory, but we still need to sync
 	 * with other processes. however, since DPDK IPC is single-threaded, we
 	 * send an asynchronous request and exit this callback.
@@ -258,6 +260,9 @@ handle_request(const struct rte_mp_msg *msg, const void *peer __rte_unused)
 	if (m->t == REQ_TYPE_ALLOC) {
 		ret = handle_alloc_request(m, entry);
 	} else if (m->t == REQ_TYPE_FREE) {
+		eal_memalloc_mem_event_notify(RTE_MEM_EVENT_FREE,
+				m->free_req.addr, m->free_req.len);
+
 		ret = malloc_heap_free_pages(m->free_req.addr,
 				m->free_req.len);
 	} else {
@@ -436,6 +441,9 @@ handle_sync_response(const struct rte_mp_msg *request,
 		memset(&rb_msg, 0, sizeof(rb_msg));
 
 		/* we've failed to sync, so do a rollback */
+		eal_memalloc_mem_event_notify(RTE_MEM_EVENT_FREE,
+				state->map_addr, state->map_len);
+
 		rollback_expand_heap(state->ms, state->ms_len, state->elem,
 				state->map_addr, state->map_len);
 
Signature · 1 line
2.17.2
#3 lore raw

PATCH v2 1/1 malloc: notify primary process about hotplug in secondary

In reply to Seth Howell

When secondary process hotplugs memory, it sends a request to primary, which then performs the real mmap() and sends sync requests to all secondary processes. Upon receiving such sync request, each secondary process will notify the upper layers of hotplugged memory (and will call all locally registered event callbacks).

In the end we'll end up with memory event callbacks fired in all the processes except the primary, which is a bug.

This gets critical if memory is hotplugged while a VFIO device is attached, as the VFIO memory registration - which is done from a memory event callback present in the primary process only - is never called.

After this patch, a primary process fires memory event callbacks before secondary processes start their synchronizations - both for hotplug and hotremove.

Fixes 07dcbfe0101f ("malloc: support multiprocess memory hotplug")
---
 lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_mp.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_mp.c +8 -0
index 5f2d4e0be..f3a13353b 100644
@@ -209,6 +209,8 @@ handle_alloc_request(const struct malloc_mp_req *m,
 
 	map_addr = ms[0]->addr;
 
+	eal_memalloc_mem_event_notify(RTE_MEM_EVENT_ALLOC, map_addr, alloc_sz);
+
 	/* we have succeeded in allocating memory, but we still need to sync
 	 * with other processes. however, since DPDK IPC is single-threaded, we
 	 * send an asynchronous request and exit this callback.
@@ -258,6 +260,9 @@ handle_request(const struct rte_mp_msg *msg, const void *peer __rte_unused)
 	if (m->t == REQ_TYPE_ALLOC) {
 		ret = handle_alloc_request(m, entry);
 	} else if (m->t == REQ_TYPE_FREE) {
+		eal_memalloc_mem_event_notify(RTE_MEM_EVENT_FREE,
+				m->free_req.addr, m->free_req.len);
+
 		ret = malloc_heap_free_pages(m->free_req.addr,
 				m->free_req.len);
 	} else {
@@ -436,6 +441,9 @@ handle_sync_response(const struct rte_mp_msg *request,
 		memset(&rb_msg, 0, sizeof(rb_msg));
 
 		/* we've failed to sync, so do a rollback */
+		eal_memalloc_mem_event_notify(RTE_MEM_EVENT_FREE,
+				state->map_addr, state->map_len);
+
 		rollback_expand_heap(state->ms, state->ms_len, state->elem,
 				state->map_addr, state->map_len);
 
Signature · 1 line
2.17.2
Reviewed-by on v2 1/1
#4 lore raw
Quoted 19 lines · Seth Howell

When secondary process hotplugs memory, it sends a request to primary, which then performs the real mmap() and sends sync requests to all secondary processes. Upon receiving such sync request, each secondary process will notify the upper layers of hotplugged memory (and will call all locally registered event callbacks).

In the end we'll end up with memory event callbacks fired in all the processes except the primary, which is a bug.

This gets critical if memory is hotplugged while a VFIO device is attached, as the VFIO memory registration - which is done from a memory event callback present in the primary process only - is never called.

After this patch, a primary process fires memory event callbacks before secondary processes start their synchronizations - both for hotplug and hotremove.

Quoted 5 lines
Fixes 07dcbfe0101f ("malloc: support multiprocess memory hotplug")

---

Lost my review tag...

Signature · 2 lines
Thanks,
Anatoly
#5 lore raw

10/12/2018 11:49, Burakov, Anatoly:

Quoted 22 lines · Seth Howell
Quoted 21 lines

When secondary process hotplugs memory, it sends a request to primary, which then performs the real mmap() and sends sync requests to all secondary processes. Upon receiving such sync request, each secondary process will notify the upper layers of hotplugged memory (and will call all locally registered event callbacks).

In the end we'll end up with memory event callbacks fired in all the processes except the primary, which is a bug.

This gets critical if memory is hotplugged while a VFIO device is attached, as the VFIO memory registration - which is done from a memory event callback present in the primary process only - is never called.

After this patch, a primary process fires memory event callbacks before secondary processes start their synchronizations - both for hotplug and hotremove.

Fixes 07dcbfe0101f ("malloc: support multiprocess memory hotplug")
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines

---

Lost my review tag...

+Cc: [email protected]

Applied, thanks