WARNING in vkms_vblank_simulate
WARNING in vkms_vblank_simulate
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=0ba17d70d062b2595e1f061231474800f076c7cb
Warning appears when a call to hrtimer_forward_now() fails. A bisection was provided and determined warning started with the following patch:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/284352/
Introduction of WARNING is clear since the patch is adding a WARN_ON() which alerts if the return of hrtimer_forward_now() function is not 1. This error was likely being produced before this patch was implemented.
Function where WARN_ON() is called after calling hrtimer_forward_now() can be found here:drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c
hrtimer_forward_now() calls return hrtimer_forward() which verifies if request to forward the timer expiry is valid. hrtimer_forward() is further explored below:
Function Objective:
* hrtimer_forward - forward the timer expiry
Function Location:kernel/time/hrtimer.c
Variables:
* @timer: hrtimer to forward * @now: forward past this time * @interval: the interval to forward * @delta: @now ? timer expiry
A warning is issued if one of the following are met:
[1] If starting time expiry is greater than ?now?
[2] If the number of intervals needed to pass ?now? is greater than 1.
In the listed crashes with reproducers the kernel version is 5.0.0 and multiple reports without reproducers on kernel version 5.1.0
I had the option to test on kernel versions 5.1.0-rc7 and 5.1.2 with no success of reproducing. I was able to verify that the WARN_ON() is still checked in the vkms_crtc.c file. Reproducer was ran individually and in a loop to attempt triggering, though to no avail. It?s possible for debugging going to kernel 5.0.0 to test reproducer and find where the warning is typically triggered from could help find the problem. Since the reports are only on 5.0.0 and 5.1.0 (atleast in this report), it's possible the changes in newer kernels have resolved the error.
Any other suggestions on further exploring this warning or tips on reproducing would be appreciated.
In the event anyone else is curious about hrtimer vs timer, here is the documentation:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/timers/hrtimers.txt
Quoted 8 lines · Kelsey Skunberg
WARNING in
vkms_vblank_simulatehttps://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=0ba17d70d062b2595e1f061231474800f076c7cb
Warning appears when a call to
hrtimer_forward_now()fails. A bisection was provided and determined warning started with the following patch:
Quoted 7 lines
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/284352/
Introduction of WARNING is clear since the patch is adding a
WARN_ON()which alerts if the return ofhrtimer_forward_now()function is not 1. This error was likely being produced before this patch was implemented.
It looks like only a few callers of hrtimer_forward_now() bother to check the return. Probably it doesn't matter in many cases.
The patch commit log doesn't really explain why the tolerance for overrun is 1. I am not sure if WARN_ON is even necessary here.
Quoted 29 lines
Function where
WARN_ON()is called after callinghrtimer_forward_now()can be found here:drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c
hrtimer_forward_now()calls returnhrtimer_forward()which verifies if request to forward the timer expiry is valid.hrtimer_forward()is further explored below:Function Objective:
*hrtimer_forward- forward the timer expiryFunction Location:
kernel/time/hrtimer.cVariables:
* @timer: hrtimer to forward * @now: forward past this time * @interval: the interval to forward * @delta: @now ? timer expiryA warning is issued if one of the following are met:
[1] If starting time expiry is greater than ?now?
[2] If the number of intervals needed to pass ?now? is greater than 1.
In the listed crashes with reproducers the kernel version is 5.0.0 and multiple reports without reproducers on kernel version 5.1.0
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 1 line
I had the option to test on kernel versions 5.1.0-rc7 and 5.1.2 with
no success of reproducing. I was able to verify that the
WARN_ON()is still checked in thevkms_crtc.cfile. Reproducer was ran individually and in a loop to attempt triggering, though to no avail. It?s possible for debugging going to kernel 5.0.0 to test reproducer and find where the warning is typically triggered from could help find the problem. Since the reports are only on 5.0.0 and 5.1.0 (atleast in this report), it's possible the changes in newer kernels have resolved the error.
This might be an obvious question. Do you have DRM_VKMS enabled in your config. More like, are you using the same config the report is using.
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=KernelConfig&x=c1e0e0ec44d1e5ff
thanks,
-- Shuah
skunberg.kelsey at gmail.com (Kelsey Skunberg)
Quoted 61 lines · Shuah Khan
Quoted 8 lines · Kelsey Skunberg
WARNING in
vkms_vblank_simulatehttps://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=0ba17d70d062b2595e1f061231474800f076c7cb
Warning appears when a call to
hrtimer_forward_now()fails. A bisection was provided and determined warning started with the following patch:Quoted 7 lines
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/284352/
Introduction of WARNING is clear since the patch is adding a
WARN_ON()which alerts if the return ofhrtimer_forward_now()function is not 1. This error was likely being produced before this patch was implemented.It looks like only a few callers of
hrtimer_forward_now()bother to check the return. Probably it doesn't matter in many cases.The patch commit log doesn't really explain why the tolerance for overrun is 1. I am not sure if
WARN_ONis even necessary here.Quoted 29 lines
Function where
WARN_ON()is called after callinghrtimer_forward_now()can be found here:drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c
hrtimer_forward_now()calls returnhrtimer_forward()which verifies if request to forward the timer expiry is valid.hrtimer_forward()is further explored below:Function Objective:
*hrtimer_forward- forward the timer expiryFunction Location:
kernel/time/hrtimer.cVariables:
* @timer: hrtimer to forward * @now: forward past this time * @interval: the interval to forward * @delta: @now ? timer expiryA warning is issued if one of the following are met:
[1] If starting time expiry is greater than ?now?
[2] If the number of intervals needed to pass ?now? is greater than 1.
In the listed crashes with reproducers the kernel version is 5.0.0 and multiple reports without reproducers on kernel version 5.1.0
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 1 line
I had the option to test on kernel versions 5.1.0-rc7 and 5.1.2 with
no success of reproducing. I was able to verify that the
WARN_ON()is still checked in thevkms_crtc.cfile. Reproducer was ran individually and in a loop to attempt triggering, though to no avail. It?s possible for debugging going to kernel 5.0.0 to test reproducer and find where the warning is typically triggered from could help find the problem. Since the reports are only on 5.0.0 and 5.1.0 (atleast in this report), it's possible the changes in newer kernels have resolved the error.
Quoted 7 lines
This might be an obvious question. Do you have
DRM_VKMSenabled in your config. More like, are you using the same config the report is using.https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=KernelConfig&x=c1e0e0ec44d1e5ff
thanks,
-- Shuah
I double checked and this is when DRM_VKMS enabled, yes. However, when I first tried to compile with the provided config file in whole I recieved an error when running "make modules_install install". So I only changed this portion of the config file which modules installed fine on, except I was still unable to reproduce the Warning.
I have extra time this week I want to come back to explore this and attempt reproducing. I'll see about taking the full config file and debug the errors I'm recieving when building modules if that occurs again.
Let me know if you have any suggestions or futher reccomendations. Thank you!
Cheers,
Kelsey