Export Runtime Configuration Interface table to sysfs
RFC PATCH 1/1 Export Runtime Configuration Interface table to sysfs
From: Narendra K <[email protected]>
System firmware advertises the address of the 'Runtime Configuration Interface table version 2 (RCI2)' via an EFI Configuration Table entry. This code retrieves the RCI2 table from the address and exports it to sysfs as a binary attribute 'rci2' under /sys/firmware/efi/tables directory. The approach adopted is similar to the attribute 'DMI' under /sys/firmware/dmi/tables.
RCI2 table contains BIOS HII in XML format and is used to populate BIOS setup page in Dell EMC OpenManage Server Administrator tool. The BIOS setup page contains BIOS tokens which can be configured.
---
Hi, the patch is created on kernel version 5.2-rc4. It applies to 5.2-rc5 also. If the approach looks correct, I will resubmit with RFC tag removed.
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-efi | 9 ++ drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile | 2 +- drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 20 ++- drivers/firmware/efi/rci2_table.c | 148 +++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/efi.h | 7 + 5 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/efi/rci2_table.c
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-efi +9 -0
@@ -28,3 +28,12 @@ Description: Displays the physical addresses of all EFI Configuration versions are always printed first, i.e. ACPI20 comes before ACPI. Users: dmidecode + +What: /sys/firmware/efi/tables/rci2 +Date: June 2019 +Contact: Narendra K <[email protected]>, [email protected] +Description: Displays the content of the Runtime Configuration Interface + Table version 2 on Dell EMC PowerEdge systems in binary format +Users: It is used by Dell EMC OpenManage Server Administrator tool to + populate BIOS setup page. +
drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile +1 -1
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ KASAN_SANITIZE_runtime-wrappers.o := n obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_BGRT) += efi-bgrt.o -obj-$(CONFIG_EFI) += efi.o vars.o reboot.o memattr.o tpm.o +obj-$(CONFIG_EFI) += efi.o vars.o reboot.o memattr.o tpm.o rci2_table.o obj-$(CONFIG_EFI) += capsule.o memmap.o obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_VARS) += efivars.o obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_ESRT) += esrt.o
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +19 -1
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ struct efi __read_mostly efi = { .rng_seed = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR, .tpm_log = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR, .mem_reserve = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR, + .rci2 = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR, };EXPORT_SYMBOL (efi);
@@ -73,6 +74,7 @@ static unsigned long *efi_tables[] = { &efi.esrt, &efi.properties_table, &efi.mem_attr_table, + &efi.rci2, }; struct mm_struct efi_mm = {
@@ -384,6 +386,9 @@ static int __init efisubsys_init(void) goto err_remove_group; } +if (efi_rci2_sysfs_init () !=0 ) +pr_debug ("efi rci2: sysfs attribute creation under /sys/firmware/efi/ failed" ); +return 0 ; err_remove_group:
@@ -488,6 +493,12 @@ static __initdata efi_config_table_type_t common_tables[] = { {NULL_GUID, NULL, NULL}, }; +/* OEM Tables */ +static __initdata efi_config_table_type_t oem_tables[] = { + {DELLEMC_EFI_RCI2_TABLE_GUID ,"RCI2" , &efi.rci2}, + {NULL_GUID ,NULL ,NULL }, +}; +static __init int match_config_table (efi_guid_t *guid,unsigned long table,efi_config_table_type_t *table_types)
@@ -538,8 +549,10 @@ int __init efi_config_parse_tables(void *config_tables, int count, int sz, table = ((efi_config_table_32_t *)tablep)->table; } -if (!match_config_table (&guid, table, common_tables)) +if (!match_config_table (&guid, table, common_tables)) {match_config_table (&guid, table, arch_tables); +match_config_table (&guid, table, oem_tables); + } tablep += sz; }
@@ -627,6 +640,11 @@ int __init efi_config_parse_tables(void *config_tables, int count, int sz, } } +if (efi.rci2 !=EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR ) +efi_rci2_table_init (); +else +pr_debug ("EFI RCI2 table address not found\n" ); +return 0 ; }
drivers/firmware/efi/rci2_table.c new file +148 -0
148 lines not on this page · raw message
include/linux/efi.h +7 -0
@@ -691,6 +691,9 @@ void efi_native_runtime_setup(void);#define LINUX_EFI_TPM_EVENT_LOG_GUID EFI_GUID(0xb7799cb0, 0xeca2, 0x4943, 0x96, 0x67, 0x1f, 0xae, 0x07, 0xb7, 0x47, 0xfa)#define LINUX_EFI_MEMRESERVE_TABLE_GUID EFI_GUID(0x888eb0c6, 0x8ede, 0x4ff5, 0xa8, 0xf0, 0x9a, 0xee, 0x5c, 0xb9, 0x77, 0xc2) +/* OEM GUIDs */ +#define DELLEMC_EFI_RCI2_TABLE_GUID EFI_GUID(0x2d9f28a2, 0xa886, 0x456a, 0x97, 0xa8, 0xf1, 0x1e, 0xf2, 0x4f, 0xf4, 0x55) + typedef struct { efi_guid_t guid; u64 table;
@@ -997,6 +1000,7 @@ extern struct efi {unsigned long rng_seed;/* UEFI firmware random seed */ unsigned long tpm_log;/* TPM2 Event Log table */ unsigned long mem_reserve;/* Linux EFI memreserve table */ +unsigned long rci2;/* Dell EMC EFI RCI2 Table */ efi_get_time_t *get_time;efi_set_time_t *set_time;efi_get_wakeup_time_t *get_wakeup_time;
@@ -1712,6 +1716,9 @@ struct linux_efi_tpm_eventlog {extern int efi_tpm_eventlog_init (void ); +extern int efi_rci2_table_init (void ); +extern int efi_rci2_sysfs_init (void ); +/* * efi_runtime_service() function identifiers. * "NONE" is used by efi_recover_from_page_fault() to check if the page
Signature · 4 lines
2.18.1 With regards, Narendra K
(+ Peter)
Quoted 15 lines · On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 12:11, <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Narendra K <[email protected]>
System firmware advertises the address of the 'Runtime Configuration Interface table version 2 (RCI2)' via an EFI Configuration Table entry. This code retrieves the RCI2 table from the address and exports it to sysfs as a binary attribute 'rci2' under
/sys/firmware/efi/tablesdirectory. The approach adopted is similar to the attribute 'DMI' under/sys/firmware/dmi/tables.RCI2 table contains BIOS HII in XML format and is used to populate BIOS setup page in Dell EMC OpenManage Server Administrator tool. The BIOS setup page contains BIOS tokens which can be configured.
Quoted 6 lines
Signed-off-by Narendra K <[email protected]>---
Hi, the patch is created on kernel version 5.2-rc4. It applies to 5.2-rc5 also. If the approach looks correct, I will resubmit with RFC tag removed.
Unfortunately, we cannot implement a generic interface for dumping config tables, since there is no generic method to record the length. So I don't have any problems with doing it this way.
I do have some comments, though.
First of all, do you know which memory type is used for this table? (more below)
Quoted 43 lines
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-efi | 9 ++ drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile | 2 +- drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 20 ++- drivers/firmware/efi/rci2_table.c | 148 +++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/efi.h | 7 + 5 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/efi/rci2_table.cDocumentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-efi +9
-0@@ -28,3 +28,12 @@ Description: Displays the physical addresses of all EFI Configuration versions are always printed first, i.e. ACPI20 comes before ACPI. Users: dmidecode + +What: /sys/firmware/efi/tables/rci2 +Date: June 2019 +Contact: Narendra K <[email protected]>, [email protected] +Description: Displays the content of the Runtime Configuration Interface + Table version 2 on Dell EMC PowerEdge systems in binary format +Users: It is used by Dell EMC OpenManage Server Administrator tool to + populate BIOS setup page. +drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile +1
-1@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ KASAN_SANITIZE_runtime-wrappers.o := n obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_BGRT) += efi-bgrt.o -obj-$(CONFIG_EFI) += efi.o vars.o reboot.o memattr.o tpm.o +obj-$(CONFIG_EFI) += efi.o vars.o reboot.o memattr.o tpm.o rci2_table.o obj-$(CONFIG_EFI) += capsule.o memmap.o obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_VARS) += efivars.o obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_ESRT) += esrt.odrivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +0
-0
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c struct efi __read_mostly efi = { · line 56
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +1
-0@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ struct efi __read_mostly efi = { .rng_seed = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR, .tpm_log = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR, .mem_reserve = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR, + .rci2 = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,
Does this really need to live in the efi struct?
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c static unsigned long *efi_tables[] = { · line 79
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +1
-0};EXPORT_SYMBOL (efi);@@ -73,6 +74,7 @@ static unsigned long *efi_tables[] = { &efi.esrt, &efi.properties_table, &efi.mem_attr_table, + &efi.rci2, };
AFAICT, this table is only used by memremap_is_efi_data() to decide whether a page should be map as unencrypted, and if the address is in boot services data or runtime services data, the test will already success, regardless of whether it appears in this enumeration.
Quoted 12 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +3
-0struct mm_struct efi_mm = {@@ -384,6 +386,9 @@ static int __init efisubsys_init(void) goto err_remove_group; } +if (efi_rci2_sysfs_init () !=0 ) +pr_debug ("efi rci2: sysfs attribute creation under /sys/firmware/efi/ failed" ); +return 0 ; err_remove_group:
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c static __initdata efi_config_table_type_t common_tables[] = { · line 498
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +3
-0@@ -488,6 +493,12 @@ static __initdata efi_config_table_type_t common_tables[] = { {NULL_GUID, NULL, NULL}, }; +/* OEM Tables */ +static __initdata efi_config_table_type_t oem_tables[] = { + {DELLEMC_EFI_RCI2_TABLE_GUID, "RCI2", &efi.rci2},
Please drop the string. We don't have to print the presence of this table in the bootlog since it has no significance to the OS itself.
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c static __initdata efi_config_table_type_t common_tables[] = { · line 501
Quoted 3 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +3
-0+ {NULL_GUID, NULL, NULL}, +}; +
Do we really need a separate oem_tables[] array?
Quoted 73 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +8
-1static __init int match_config_table (efi_guid_t *guid,unsigned long table,efi_config_table_type_t *table_types)@@ -538,8 +549,10 @@ int __init efi_config_parse_tables(void *config_tables, int count, int sz, table = ((efi_config_table_32_t *)tablep)->table; } -if (!match_config_table (&guid, table, common_tables)) +if (!match_config_table (&guid, table, common_tables)) {match_config_table (&guid, table, arch_tables); +match_config_table (&guid, table, oem_tables); + } tablep += sz; }@@ -627,6 +640,11 @@ int __init efi_config_parse_tables(void *config_tables, int count, int sz, } } +if (efi.rci2 !=EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR ) +efi_rci2_table_init (); +else +pr_debug ("EFI RCI2 table address not found\n" ); +return 0 ; }drivers/firmware/efi/rci2_table.c new file +40
-0@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* +* Export Runtime Configuration Interface Table Version 2 (RCI2) +* to sysfs +* +* Copyright (C) 2019 Dell Inc +* by Narendra K <[email protected]> +* +* System firmware advertises the address of the RCI2 Table via +* an EFI Configuration Table entry. This code retrieves the RCI2 +* table from the address and exports it to sysfs as a binary +* attribute 'rci2' under /sys/firmware/efi/tables directory. +*/ + +#include <linux/kobject.h> +#include <linux/device.h> +#include <linux/sysfs.h> +#include <linux/efi.h> +#include <linux/types.h> +#include <linux/io.h> + +#define RCI_SIGNATURE "_RC_" + +struct rci2_table_global_hdr { +u16 type; +u16 resvd0; +u16 hdr_len; +u8 rci2_sig[4 ]; +u16 resvd1; +u32 resvd2; +u32 resvd3; +u8 major_rev; +u8 minor_rev; +u16 num_of_structs; +u32 rci2_len; +u16 rci2_chksum; +} __packed; + +static u8 *rci2_base; +static u32 rci2_table_len;
drivers/firmware/efi/rci2_table.c line 50
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/rci2_table.c new file +10
-0+ +int __init efi_rci2_table_init (void ) +{ + rci2_base =early_memremap (efi.rci2, +sizeof (struct rci2_table_global_hdr )); +if (!rci2_base) { +pr_debug ("RCI2 table init failed - could not map RCI2 table\n" ); +return -ENOMEM ; + } +
Do we really need to do this early? And is it guaranteed that the memory will not be given to the OS for general allocation?
Quoted 43 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/rci2_table.c new file +43
-0+if (strncmp (rci2_base + + offsetof(struct rci2_table_global_hdr , rci2_sig), +RCI_SIGNATURE ,4 )) { +memunmap (rci2_base); +pr_debug ("RCI2 table init failed - incorrect signature\n" ); +return -ENODEV ; + } + + rci2_table_len = *(u32 *)(rci2_base + + offsetof(struct rci2_table_global_hdr , + rci2_len)); + +early_memunmap (rci2_base,sizeof (struct rci2_table_global_hdr )); + +return 0 ; +} + +static ssize_t raw_table_read (struct file *file,struct kobject *kobj, +struct bin_attribute *attr,char *buf, +loff_t pos,size_t count) +{ +memcpy (buf, attr->private + pos, count); +return count; +} + +static BIN_ATTR(rci2, S_IRUSR, raw_table_read, NULL, 0); + +static u16 checksum (void ) +{ +u8 len_is_odd = rci2_table_len %2 ; +u32 chksum_len = rci2_table_len; +u16 *base = (u16 *)rci2_base; +u8 buf[2 ] = {0 }; +u32 offset =0 ; +u16 chksum =0 ; + +if (len_is_odd) + chksum_len -=1 ; + +while (offset < chksum_len) { + chksum += *base; + offset +=2 ; + base++;
drivers/firmware/efi/rci2_table.c line 103
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/rci2_table.c new file +10
-0+ } + +if (len_is_odd) { + buf[0 ] = *(u8 *)base; + chksum += *(u16 *)(buf); + } + +return chksum; +} +
What is this random checksum function? Which algorithm does it implement, and did you check whether we already have a library function for it?
Quoted 82 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/rci2_table.c new file +45
-0+int __init efi_rci2_sysfs_init (void ) +{ + +struct kobject *tables_kobj; +int ret = -ENOMEM ; + +if (!rci2_table_len) + goto err; + + rci2_base =memremap (efi.rci2, rci2_table_len,MEMREMAP_WB ); +if (!rci2_base) { +pr_debug ("RCI2 table - could not map RCI2 table\n" ); +return -ENOMEM ; + } + +if (checksum () !=0 ) { +pr_debug ("RCI2 table - incorrect checksum\n" ); + ret = -ENODEV ; + goto err_unmap; + } + + tables_kobj =kobject_create_and_add ("tables" , efi_kobj); +if (!tables_kobj) { +pr_debug ("RCI2 table - tables_kobj creation failed\n" ); + goto err_unmap; + } + + bin_attr_rci2.size = rci2_table_len; + bin_attr_rci2.private = rci2_base; + ret =sysfs_create_bin_file (tables_kobj, &bin_attr_rci2); +if (ret !=0 ) { +pr_debug ("RCI2 table - rci2 sysfs bin file creation failed\n" ); +kobject_del (tables_kobj); +kobject_put (tables_kobj); + goto err_unmap; + } + +return 0 ; + + err_unmap: +memunmap (rci2_base); + err: +pr_debug ("RCI2 table - sysfs initialization failed\n" ); +return ret; +}include/linux/efi.h +7
-1@@ -691,6 +691,9 @@ void efi_native_runtime_setup(void);#define LINUX_EFI_TPM_EVENT_LOG_GUID EFI_GUID(0xb7799cb0, 0xeca2, 0x4943, 0x96, 0x67, 0x1f, 0xae, 0x07, 0xb7, 0x47, 0xfa)#define LINUX_EFI_MEMRESERVE_TABLE_GUID EFI_GUID(0x888eb0c6, 0x8ede, 0x4ff5, 0xa8, 0xf0, 0x9a, 0xee, 0x5c, 0xb9, 0x77, 0xc2) +/* OEM GUIDs */ +#define DELLEMC_EFI_RCI2_TABLE_GUID EFI_GUID(0x2d9f28a2, 0xa886, 0x456a, 0x97, 0xa8, 0xf1, 0x1e, 0xf2, 0x4f, 0xf4, 0x55) + typedef struct { efi_guid_t guid; u64 table;@@ -997,6 +1000,7 @@ extern struct efi {unsigned long rng_seed;/* UEFI firmware random seed */ unsigned long tpm_log;/* TPM2 Event Log table */ unsigned long mem_reserve;/* Linux EFI memreserve table */ +unsigned long rci2;/* Dell EMC EFI RCI2 Table */ efi_get_time_t *get_time;efi_set_time_t *set_time;efi_get_wakeup_time_t *get_wakeup_time;@@ -1712,6 +1716,9 @@ struct linux_efi_tpm_eventlog {extern int efi_tpm_eventlog_init (void ); +extern int efi_rci2_table_init (void ); +extern int efi_rci2_sysfs_init (void ); +/* * efi_runtime_service() function identifiers. * "NONE" is used by efi_recover_from_page_fault() to check if the page -- 2.18.1
With regards,
Narendra K
Quoted 13 lines · Ard Biesheuvel
(+ Peter)
Quoted 10 lines · On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 12:11, <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Narendra K <[email protected]>
System firmware advertises the address of the 'Runtime Configuration Interface table version 2 (RCI2)' via an EFI Configuration Table entry. This code retrieves the RCI2 table from the address and exports it to sysfs as a binary attribute 'rci2' under
/sys/firmware/efi/tablesdirectory. The approach adopted is similar to the attribute 'DMI' under/sys/firmware/dmi/tables.
[...]
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
---
Hi, the patch is created on kernel version 5.2-rc4. It applies to 5.2-rc5 also. If the approach looks correct, I will resubmit with RFC tag removed.
Hi Ard,
Thank you for the review comments.
Quoted 7 lines
Unfortunately, we cannot implement a generic interface for dumping config tables, since there is no generic method to record the length. So I don't have any problems with doing it this way.
I do have some comments, though.
First of all, do you know which memory type is used for this table? (more below)
The memory type used for the table is EfiReservedMemoryType.
[...]
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile +1
-0+obj-$(CONFIG_EFI) += efi.o vars.o reboot.o memattr.o tpm.o rci2_table.o obj-$(CONFIG_EFI) += capsule.o memmap.o obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_VARS) += efivars.o obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_ESRT) += esrt.odrivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +0
-1--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c struct efi __read_mostly efi = { · line 56
Quoted 6 lines
+++
b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.cdrivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +1
-0@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ struct efi __read_mostly efi = { .rng_seed = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR, .tpm_log = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR, .mem_reserve = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR, + .rci2 = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,Does this really need to live in the efi struct?
It probably need not be part of struct efi. We could define a struct of type 'efi_config_table_type_t' in the rci2_table.c. Did you have a similar idea in mind ? If yes, I will modify and test this idea.
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +0
-0};EXPORT_SYMBOL (efi);
Quoted 12 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c static unsigned long *efi_tables[] = { · line 79
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +1
-0@@ -73,6 +74,7 @@ static unsigned long *efi_tables[] = { &efi.esrt, &efi.properties_table, &efi.mem_attr_table, + &efi.rci2, };AFAICT, this table is only used by
memremap_is_efi_data()to decide whether a page should be map as unencrypted, and if the address is in boot services data or runtime services data, the test will already success, regardless of whether it appears in this enumeration.
Yes. Before 'memremap_is_efi_data()' checks if the memory type is boot services data for runtime services data, it checks if the address is a 'table' address in 'efi_is_table_address'. I added it because of this check. Since the memory type used for the table is efi reserved type, we need to add the table address to 'efi_tables' array so that it could be checked in 'efi_is_table_address'. Please share your thought on this.
Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 16 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +3
-0struct mm_struct efi_mm = {@@ -384,6 +386,9 @@ static int __init efisubsys_init(void) goto err_remove_group; } +if (efi_rci2_sysfs_init () !=0 ) +pr_debug ("efi rci2: sysfs attribute creation under /sys/firmware/efi/ failed" ); +return 0 ; err_remove_group:@@ -488,6 +493,12 @@ static __initdata efi_config_table_type_t common_tables[] = { {NULL_GUID, NULL, NULL}, };
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c static __initdata efi_config_table_type_t common_tables[] = { · line 498
Quoted 3 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +3
-0+/* OEM Tables */ +static __initdata efi_config_table_type_t oem_tables[] = { + {DELLEMC_EFI_RCI2_TABLE_GUID ,"RCI2" , &efi.rci2},Please drop the string. We don't have to print the presence of this table in the bootlog since it has no significance to the OS itself.
Okay. I will drop this in the next version of the patch.
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c static __initdata efi_config_table_type_t common_tables[] = { · line 501
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +3
-0+ {NULL_GUID, NULL, NULL}, +}; +Do we really need a separate oem_tables[] array?
The RCI2 table did not seem to be part of the group of common tables such as SMBIOS and ACPI. To indicate this, I created a separate array. It seems like it is not required. Having the array allows to leverage the table matching code in 'match_config_table' function. Would you prefer to have this entry added to the 'common_tables' array ?
[...]
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +5
-0+ +int __init efi_rci2_table_init (void ) +{ + rci2_base =early_memremap (efi.rci2, +sizeof (struct rci2_table_global_hdr ));
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +5
-0+if (!rci2_base) { +pr_debug ("RCI2 table init failed - could not map RCI2 table\n" ); +return -ENOMEM ; + } +Do we really need to do this early? And is it guaranteed that the memory will not be given to the OS for general allocation?
As the memory type is efi reserved type, it is guaranteed that the memory will not be give to OS for general allocation. It is mapped here to determine the size of the table and unmapped in the same function.
Would you prefer to merge this function into 'efi_rci2_sysfs_init' function ?
Quoted 18 lines
Quoted 18 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +16
-0+if (strncmp (rci2_base + + offsetof(struct rci2_table_global_hdr , rci2_sig), +RCI_SIGNATURE ,4 )) { +memunmap (rci2_base); +pr_debug ("RCI2 table init failed - incorrect signature\n" ); +return -ENODEV ; + } + + rci2_table_len = *(u32 *)(rci2_base + + offsetof(struct rci2_table_global_hdr , + rci2_len)); + +early_memunmap (rci2_base,sizeof (struct rci2_table_global_hdr )); + +return 0 ; +}
[...]
Quoted 23 lines
Quoted 23 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +23
-0+ +static u16 checksum (void ) +{ +u8 len_is_odd = rci2_table_len %2 ; +u32 chksum_len = rci2_table_len; +u16 *base = (u16 *)rci2_base; +u8 buf[2 ] = {0 }; +u32 offset =0 ; +u16 chksum =0 ; + +if (len_is_odd) + chksum_len -=1 ; + +while (offset < chksum_len) { + chksum += *base; + offset +=2 ; + base++; + } + +if (len_is_odd) { + buf[0 ] = *(u8 *)base; + chksum += *(u16 *)(buf); + }
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +4
-0+ +return chksum; +} +What is this random checksum function? Which algorithm does it implement, and did you check whether we already have a library function for it?
It does not implement any algorithm. The 16 bit sum of rci2_chksum field in the struct rci2_table_global_hdr and rest of bytes of the table needs to be zero. If length of the table is odd, a single byte with value zero needs to be added at the end for the purpose of checksum calculation.
I checked in the library and did not find a function implementing similar functionality. Please let me know if I missed any detail here.
Quoted 84 lines
Quoted 84 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +45
-0+int __init efi_rci2_sysfs_init (void ) +{ + +struct kobject *tables_kobj; +int ret = -ENOMEM ; + +if (!rci2_table_len) + goto err; + + rci2_base =memremap (efi.rci2, rci2_table_len,MEMREMAP_WB ); +if (!rci2_base) { +pr_debug ("RCI2 table - could not map RCI2 table\n" ); +return -ENOMEM ; + } + +if (checksum () !=0 ) { +pr_debug ("RCI2 table - incorrect checksum\n" ); + ret = -ENODEV ; + goto err_unmap; + } + + tables_kobj =kobject_create_and_add ("tables" , efi_kobj); +if (!tables_kobj) { +pr_debug ("RCI2 table - tables_kobj creation failed\n" ); + goto err_unmap; + } + + bin_attr_rci2.size = rci2_table_len; + bin_attr_rci2.private = rci2_base; + ret =sysfs_create_bin_file (tables_kobj, &bin_attr_rci2); +if (ret !=0 ) { +pr_debug ("RCI2 table - rci2 sysfs bin file creation failed\n" ); +kobject_del (tables_kobj); +kobject_put (tables_kobj); + goto err_unmap; + } + +return 0 ; + + err_unmap: +memunmap (rci2_base); + err: +pr_debug ("RCI2 table - sysfs initialization failed\n" ); +return ret; +}include/linux/efi.h +7
-1@@ -691,6 +691,9 @@ void efi_native_runtime_setup(void);#define LINUX_EFI_TPM_EVENT_LOG_GUID EFI_GUID(0xb7799cb0, 0xeca2, 0x4943, 0x96, 0x67, 0x1f, 0xae, 0x07, 0xb7, 0x47, 0xfa)#define LINUX_EFI_MEMRESERVE_TABLE_GUID EFI_GUID(0x888eb0c6, 0x8ede, 0x4ff5, 0xa8, 0xf0, 0x9a, 0xee, 0x5c, 0xb9, 0x77, 0xc2) +/* OEM GUIDs */ +#define DELLEMC_EFI_RCI2_TABLE_GUID EFI_GUID(0x2d9f28a2, 0xa886, 0x456a, 0x97, 0xa8, 0xf1, 0x1e, 0xf2, 0x4f, 0xf4, 0x55) + typedef struct { efi_guid_t guid; u64 table;@@ -997,6 +1000,7 @@ extern struct efi {unsigned long rng_seed;/* UEFI firmware random seed */ unsigned long tpm_log;/* TPM2 Event Log table */ unsigned long mem_reserve;/* Linux EFI memreserve table */ +unsigned long rci2;/* Dell EMC EFI RCI2 Table */ efi_get_time_t *get_time;efi_set_time_t *set_time;efi_get_wakeup_time_t *get_wakeup_time;@@ -1712,6 +1716,9 @@ struct linux_efi_tpm_eventlog {extern int efi_tpm_eventlog_init (void ); +extern int efi_rci2_table_init (void ); +extern int efi_rci2_sysfs_init (void ); +/* * efi_runtime_service() function identifiers. * "NONE" is used by efi_recover_from_page_fault() to check if the page -- 2.18.1
With regards,
Narendra K
Signature · 2 lines
With regards, Narendra K
Quoted 30 lines · On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 14:10, <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 13 lines · Ard Biesheuvel
(+ Peter)
Quoted 10 lines · On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 12:11, <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Narendra K <[email protected]>
System firmware advertises the address of the 'Runtime Configuration Interface table version 2 (RCI2)' via an EFI Configuration Table entry. This code retrieves the RCI2 table from the address and exports it to sysfs as a binary attribute 'rci2' under
/sys/firmware/efi/tablesdirectory. The approach adopted is similar to the attribute 'DMI' under/sys/firmware/dmi/tables.[...]
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
---
Hi, the patch is created on kernel version 5.2-rc4. It applies to 5.2-rc5 also. If the approach looks correct, I will resubmit with RFC tag removed.Hi Ard,
Thank you for the review comments.
Quoted 4 lines
Unfortunately, we cannot implement a generic interface for dumping config tables, since there is no generic method to record the length. So I don't have any problems with doing it this way.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
I do have some comments, though.
First of all, do you know which memory type is used for this table? (more below)
The memory type used for the table is EfiReservedMemoryType.
OK
Quoted 17 lines
[...]
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile +1
-0+obj-$(CONFIG_EFI) += efi.o vars.o reboot.o memattr.o tpm.o rci2_table.o obj-$(CONFIG_EFI) += capsule.o memmap.o obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_VARS) += efivars.o obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_ESRT) += esrt.odrivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +0
-1--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.cQuoted 8 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c struct efi __read_mostly efi = { · line 56
Quoted 6 lines
+++
b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.cdrivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +1
-0@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ struct efi __read_mostly efi = { .rng_seed = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR, .tpm_log = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR, .mem_reserve = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR, + .rci2 = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,Does this really need to live in the efi struct?
Quoted 4 lines
It probably need not be part of struct efi. We could define a struct of type '
efi_config_table_type_t' in therci2_table.c. Did you have a similar idea in mind ? If yes, I will modify and test this idea.
Yes, I'd like to start keeping these things separate.
I pushed a branch here
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/efi/efi.git/log/?h=next
that changes the way uv_systab is handled, and moves it into arch/x86. Please follow that pattern instead.
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +0
-0};EXPORT_SYMBOL (efi);Quoted 12 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c static unsigned long *efi_tables[] = { · line 79
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +1
-0@@ -73,6 +74,7 @@ static unsigned long *efi_tables[] = { &efi.esrt, &efi.properties_table, &efi.mem_attr_table, + &efi.rci2, };AFAICT, this table is only used by
memremap_is_efi_data()to decide whether a page should be map as unencrypted, and if the address is in boot services data or runtime services data, the test will already success, regardless of whether it appears in this enumeration.
Quoted 7 lines
Yes. Before '
memremap_is_efi_data()' checks if the memory type is boot services data for runtime services data, it checks if the address is a 'table' address in 'efi_is_table_address'. I added it because of this check. Since the memory type used for the table is efi reserved type, we need to add the table address to 'efi_tables' array so that it could be checked in 'efi_is_table_address'. Please share your thought on this.
OK. My branch ^^^ moves this into arch/x86 as well, please add it there
Quoted 32 lines
Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 16 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +3
-0struct mm_struct efi_mm = {@@ -384,6 +386,9 @@ static int __init efisubsys_init(void) goto err_remove_group; } +if (efi_rci2_sysfs_init () !=0 ) +pr_debug ("efi rci2: sysfs attribute creation under /sys/firmware/efi/ failed" ); +return 0 ; err_remove_group:@@ -488,6 +493,12 @@ static __initdata efi_config_table_type_t common_tables[] = { {NULL_GUID, NULL, NULL}, };Quoted 6 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c static __initdata efi_config_table_type_t common_tables[] = { · line 498
Quoted 3 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +3
-0+/* OEM Tables */ +static __initdata efi_config_table_type_t oem_tables[] = { + {DELLEMC_EFI_RCI2_TABLE_GUID ,"RCI2" , &efi.rci2},Please drop the string. We don't have to print the presence of this table in the bootlog since it has no significance to the OS itself.
Okay. I will drop this in the next version of the patch.
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c static __initdata efi_config_table_type_t common_tables[] = { · line 501
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +3
-0+ {NULL_GUID, NULL, NULL}, +}; +Do we really need a separate oem_tables[] array?
Quoted 6 lines
The RCI2 table did not seem to be part of the group of common tables such as SMBIOS and ACPI. To indicate this, I created a separate array. It seems like it is not required. Having the array allows to leverage the table matching code in '
match_config_table' function. Would you prefer to have this entry added to the 'common_tables' array ?
Please add it to the arch_tables array in arch/x86 (if my assumption is correct that this is x86-only)
Quoted 15 lines
[...]
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +5
-0+ +int __init efi_rci2_table_init (void ) +{ + rci2_base =early_memremap (efi.rci2, +sizeof (struct rci2_table_global_hdr ));Quoted 8 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +5
-0+if (!rci2_base) { +pr_debug ("RCI2 table init failed - could not map RCI2 table\n" ); +return -ENOMEM ; + } +Do we really need to do this early? And is it guaranteed that the memory will not be given to the OS for general allocation?
Quoted 6 lines
As the memory type is efi reserved type, it is guaranteed that the memory will not be give to OS for general allocation. It is mapped here to determine the size of the table and unmapped in the same function.
Would you prefer to merge this function into '
efi_rci2_sysfs_init' function ?
Yes. Only user space needs to access this, so we can defer this to later, when the normal memremap() functions are available.
Quoted 53 lines
Quoted 18 lines
Quoted 18 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +16
-0+if (strncmp (rci2_base + + offsetof(struct rci2_table_global_hdr , rci2_sig), +RCI_SIGNATURE ,4 )) { +memunmap (rci2_base); +pr_debug ("RCI2 table init failed - incorrect signature\n" ); +return -ENODEV ; + } + + rci2_table_len = *(u32 *)(rci2_base + + offsetof(struct rci2_table_global_hdr , + rci2_len)); + +early_memunmap (rci2_base,sizeof (struct rci2_table_global_hdr )); + +return 0 ; +}[...]
Quoted 23 lines
Quoted 23 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +23
-0+ +static u16 checksum (void ) +{ +u8 len_is_odd = rci2_table_len %2 ; +u32 chksum_len = rci2_table_len; +u16 *base = (u16 *)rci2_base; +u8 buf[2 ] = {0 }; +u32 offset =0 ; +u16 chksum =0 ; + +if (len_is_odd) + chksum_len -=1 ; + +while (offset < chksum_len) { + chksum += *base; + offset +=2 ; + base++; + } + +if (len_is_odd) { + buf[0 ] = *(u8 *)base; + chksum += *(u16 *)(buf); + }Quoted 8 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +4
-0+ +return chksum; +} +What is this random checksum function? Which algorithm does it implement, and did you check whether we already have a library function for it?
Quoted 8 lines
It does not implement any algorithm. The 16 bit sum of
rci2_chksumfield in the structrci2_table_global_hdrand rest of bytes of the table needs to be zero. If length of the table is odd, a single byte with value zero needs to be added at the end for the purpose of checksum calculation.I checked in the library and did not find a function implementing similar functionality. Please let me know if I missed any detail here.
OK.
Quoted 87 lines
Quoted 82 lines
Quoted 82 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +45
-0+int __init efi_rci2_sysfs_init (void ) +{ + +struct kobject *tables_kobj; +int ret = -ENOMEM ; + +if (!rci2_table_len) + goto err; + + rci2_base =memremap (efi.rci2, rci2_table_len,MEMREMAP_WB ); +if (!rci2_base) { +pr_debug ("RCI2 table - could not map RCI2 table\n" ); +return -ENOMEM ; + } + +if (checksum () !=0 ) { +pr_debug ("RCI2 table - incorrect checksum\n" ); + ret = -ENODEV ; + goto err_unmap; + } + + tables_kobj =kobject_create_and_add ("tables" , efi_kobj); +if (!tables_kobj) { +pr_debug ("RCI2 table - tables_kobj creation failed\n" ); + goto err_unmap; + } + + bin_attr_rci2.size = rci2_table_len; + bin_attr_rci2.private = rci2_base; + ret =sysfs_create_bin_file (tables_kobj, &bin_attr_rci2); +if (ret !=0 ) { +pr_debug ("RCI2 table - rci2 sysfs bin file creation failed\n" ); +kobject_del (tables_kobj); +kobject_put (tables_kobj); + goto err_unmap; + } + +return 0 ; + + err_unmap: +memunmap (rci2_base); + err: +pr_debug ("RCI2 table - sysfs initialization failed\n" ); +return ret; +}include/linux/efi.h +7
-1@@ -691,6 +691,9 @@ void efi_native_runtime_setup(void);#define LINUX_EFI_TPM_EVENT_LOG_GUID EFI_GUID(0xb7799cb0, 0xeca2, 0x4943, 0x96, 0x67, 0x1f, 0xae, 0x07, 0xb7, 0x47, 0xfa)#define LINUX_EFI_MEMRESERVE_TABLE_GUID EFI_GUID(0x888eb0c6, 0x8ede, 0x4ff5, 0xa8, 0xf0, 0x9a, 0xee, 0x5c, 0xb9, 0x77, 0xc2) +/* OEM GUIDs */ +#define DELLEMC_EFI_RCI2_TABLE_GUID EFI_GUID(0x2d9f28a2, 0xa886, 0x456a, 0x97, 0xa8, 0xf1, 0x1e, 0xf2, 0x4f, 0xf4, 0x55) + typedef struct { efi_guid_t guid; u64 table;@@ -997,6 +1000,7 @@ extern struct efi {unsigned long rng_seed;/* UEFI firmware random seed */ unsigned long tpm_log;/* TPM2 Event Log table */ unsigned long mem_reserve;/* Linux EFI memreserve table */ +unsigned long rci2;/* Dell EMC EFI RCI2 Table */ efi_get_time_t *get_time;efi_set_time_t *set_time;efi_get_wakeup_time_t *get_wakeup_time;@@ -1712,6 +1716,9 @@ struct linux_efi_tpm_eventlog {extern int efi_tpm_eventlog_init (void ); +extern int efi_rci2_table_init (void ); +extern int efi_rci2_sysfs_init (void ); +/* * efi_runtime_service() function identifiers. * "NONE" is used by efi_recover_from_page_fault() to check if the page -- 2.18.1
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
With regards,
Narendra K--
With regards,
Narendra K
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 04:21:33PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
[...]
Quoted 15 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c struct efi __read_mostly efi = { · line 56
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +1
-0@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ struct efi __read_mostly efi = { .rng_seed = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR, .tpm_log = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR, .mem_reserve = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR, + .rci2 = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,Does this really need to live in the efi struct?
Quoted 4 lines
It probably need not be part of struct efi. We could define a struct of type '
efi_config_table_type_t' in therci2_table.c. Did you have a similar idea in mind ? If yes, I will modify and test this idea.
Quoted 8 lines
Yes, I'd like to start keeping these things separate.
I pushed a branch here
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/efi/efi.git/log/?h=next
that changes the way
uv_systabis handled, and moves it intoarch/x86. Please follow that pattern instead.
Okay. Thank you for the guidance. I will make this change in the next version.
Quoted 26 lines
Quoted 18 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +0
-0};EXPORT_SYMBOL (efi);Quoted 12 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c static unsigned long *efi_tables[] = { · line 79
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +1
-0@@ -73,6 +74,7 @@ static unsigned long *efi_tables[] = { &efi.esrt, &efi.properties_table, &efi.mem_attr_table, + &efi.rci2, };AFAICT, this table is only used by
memremap_is_efi_data()to decide whether a page should be map as unencrypted, and if the address is in boot services data or runtime services data, the test will already success, regardless of whether it appears in this enumeration.Quoted 7 lines
Yes. Before '
memremap_is_efi_data()' checks if the memory type is boot services data for runtime services data, it checks if the address is a 'table' address in 'efi_is_table_address'. I added it because of this check. Since the memory type used for the table is efi reserved type, we need to add the table address to 'efi_tables' array so that it could be checked in 'efi_is_table_address'. Please share your thought on this.
Quoted 1 line
OK. My branch ^^^ moves this into
arch/x86as well, please add it there
I have a query related to this change. I will discuss it in next section below as it helps provide complete context.
Quoted 27 lines
Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c static __initdata efi_config_table_type_t common_tables[] = { · line 498
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +3
-0@@ -488,6 +493,12 @@ static __initdata efi_config_table_type_t common_tables[] = { {NULL_GUID, NULL, NULL}, }; +/* OEM Tables */ +static __initdata efi_config_table_type_t oem_tables[] = { + {DELLEMC_EFI_RCI2_TABLE_GUID, "RCI2", &efi.rci2},Please drop the string. We don't have to print the presence of this table in the bootlog since it has no significance to the OS itself.
Okay. I will drop this in the next version of the patch.
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c static __initdata efi_config_table_type_t common_tables[] = { · line 501
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +3
-0+ {NULL_GUID, NULL, NULL}, +}; +Do we really need a separate oem_tables[] array?
Quoted 6 lines
The RCI2 table did not seem to be part of the group of common tables such as SMBIOS and ACPI. To indicate this, I created a separate array. It seems like it is not required. Having the array allows to leverage the table matching code in '
match_config_table' function. Would you prefer to have this entry added to the 'common_tables' array ?
Quoted 2 lines
Please add it to the
arch_tablesarray inarch/x86(if my assumption is correct that this is x86-only)
The table is used on x86. But it is not specific to x86 and is independent of the architecture. Because of this detail, my thinking is to keep the rci2_table.c and related changes in generic efi layer drivers/firmware/efi/. If we keep the changes in drivers/firmware/efi/, then two options are
1. Retain the oem_tables array and add rci2 table address to this array
2. Add rci2 table address to common_tables array
Does this detail sound correct ?
Also, since the 'efi_is_table_address' function and efi_tables array are moved to arch/x86, for rci2 table address to be detected as a table address, it needs to be added to 'efi_tables' array. Would it be correct to add rci2 table address to this array with rest of the changes residing in the generic efi layer ?
Please share your thoughts on the two details.
[...]
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Would you prefer to merge this function into '
efi_rci2_sysfs_init' function ?Yes. Only user space needs to access this, so we can defer this to later, when the normal
memremap()functions are available.
Okay, I will make this change in the next version.
Signature · 2 lines
With regards, Narendra K
Quoted 96 lines · On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 14:17, <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 04:21:33PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
[...]Quoted 15 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c struct efi __read_mostly efi = { · line 56
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +1
-0@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ struct efi __read_mostly efi = { .rng_seed = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR, .tpm_log = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR, .mem_reserve = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR, + .rci2 = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,Does this really need to live in the efi struct?
Quoted 4 lines
It probably need not be part of struct efi. We could define a struct of type '
efi_config_table_type_t' in therci2_table.c. Did you have a similar idea in mind ? If yes, I will modify and test this idea.Quoted 8 lines
Yes, I'd like to start keeping these things separate.
I pushed a branch here
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/efi/efi.git/log/?h=next
that changes the way
uv_systabis handled, and moves it intoarch/x86. Please follow that pattern instead.Okay. Thank you for the guidance. I will make this change in the next version.
Quoted 26 lines
Quoted 18 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +0
-0};EXPORT_SYMBOL (efi);Quoted 12 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c static unsigned long *efi_tables[] = { · line 79
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +1
-0@@ -73,6 +74,7 @@ static unsigned long *efi_tables[] = { &efi.esrt, &efi.properties_table, &efi.mem_attr_table, + &efi.rci2, };AFAICT, this table is only used by
memremap_is_efi_data()to decide whether a page should be map as unencrypted, and if the address is in boot services data or runtime services data, the test will already success, regardless of whether it appears in this enumeration.Quoted 7 lines
Yes. Before '
memremap_is_efi_data()' checks if the memory type is boot services data for runtime services data, it checks if the address is a 'table' address in 'efi_is_table_address'. I added it because of this check. Since the memory type used for the table is efi reserved type, we need to add the table address to 'efi_tables' array so that it could be checked in 'efi_is_table_address'. Please share your thought on this.Quoted 1 line
OK. My branch ^^^ moves this into
arch/x86as well, please add it thereI have a query related to this change. I will discuss it in next section below as it helps provide complete context.
Quoted 27 lines
Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c static __initdata efi_config_table_type_t common_tables[] = { · line 498
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +3
-0@@ -488,6 +493,12 @@ static __initdata efi_config_table_type_t common_tables[] = { {NULL_GUID, NULL, NULL}, }; +/* OEM Tables */ +static __initdata efi_config_table_type_t oem_tables[] = { + {DELLEMC_EFI_RCI2_TABLE_GUID, "RCI2", &efi.rci2},Please drop the string. We don't have to print the presence of this table in the bootlog since it has no significance to the OS itself.
Okay. I will drop this in the next version of the patch.
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c static __initdata efi_config_table_type_t common_tables[] = { · line 501
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +3
-0+ {NULL_GUID, NULL, NULL}, +}; +Do we really need a separate oem_tables[] array?
Quoted 6 lines
The RCI2 table did not seem to be part of the group of common tables such as SMBIOS and ACPI. To indicate this, I created a separate array. It seems like it is not required. Having the array allows to leverage the table matching code in '
match_config_table' function. Would you prefer to have this entry added to the 'common_tables' array ?Quoted 2 lines
Please add it to the
arch_tablesarray inarch/x86(if my assumption is correct that this is x86-only)The table is used on x86. But it is not specific to x86 and is independent of the architecture. Because of this detail, my thinking is to keep the
rci2_table.cand related changes in generic efi layerdrivers/firmware/efi/. If we keep the changes indrivers/firmware/efi/, then two options are
Quoted 5 lines
1. Retain the
oem_tablesarray and add rci2 table address to this array
2. Add rci2 table address tocommon_tablesarrayDoes this detail sound correct ?
Yes, and I'd prefer the latter.
Quoted 6 lines
Also, since the '
efi_is_table_address' function andefi_tablesarray are moved toarch/x86, for rci2 table address to be detected as a table address, it needs to be added to 'efi_tables' array. Would it be correct to add rci2 table address to this array with rest of the changes residing in the generic efi layer ?
Yes.
Quoted 15 lines
Please share your thoughts on the two details.
[...]
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Would you prefer to merge this function into '
efi_rci2_sysfs_init' function ?Yes. Only user space needs to access this, so we can defer this to later, when the normal
memremap()functions are available.Okay, I will make this change in the next version.
--
With regards,
Narendra K