scsi: aha1740: Use !x in place of NULL comparisons
PATCH 1/1 scsi: aha1740: Use !x in place of NULL comparisons
Change (x == NULL) to !x and (x != NULL) to x, to fix following checkpatch.pl warnings:
CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "!x".
--- drivers/scsi/aha1740.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/scsi/aha1740.c +2 -2
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static int aha1740_queuecommand_lck(struct scsi_cmnd * SCpnt, SCpnt->host_scribble =dma_alloc_coherent (&host->edev->dev,sizeof (struct aha1740_sg ), &sg_dma,GFP_ATOMIC ); -if (SCpnt->host_scribble ==NULL ) { +if (!(SCpnt->host_scribble)) {printk (KERN_WARNING "aha1740: out of memory in queuecommand!\n" );return 1 ; }
@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ static int aha1740_probe (struct device *dev) translation ? "en" : "dis"); shpnt =scsi_host_alloc (&aha1740_template,sizeof (struct aha1740_hostdata )); -if (shpnt ==NULL ) +if (!shpnt) goto err_release_region; shpnt->base =0 ;
Signature · 1 line
2.22.0
Quoted 3 lines · Keyur Patel
Change (x == NULL) to !x and (x != NULL) to x, to fix following checkpatch.pl warnings:
CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "!x".
This is one of our significantly older drivers. We try not to touch it unless we really have to, so I'd rather not have patches like this applied to it.
I also don't really think the replacement adds anything to readability, so it should probably be removed from the checkpatch warnings.
Thanks,
James
James,
Quoted 2 lines
I also don't really think the replacement adds anything to readability, so it should probably be removed from the checkpatch warnings.
I agree.
Signature · 1 line
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering