libical: upgrade to 3.0.5
PATCH 1/1 libical: upgrade to 3.0.5
Note that this upgrade includes some API breakage.
---
...ibical.pc.in-fix-iculibs-remove-full.patch | 44 -------------------
.../{libical_2.0.0.bb => libical_3.0.5.bb} | 20 +++++----
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/libical/libical/0001-CMakeLists.txt-libical.pc.in-fix-iculibs-remove-full.patch
rename meta/recipes-support/libical/{libical_2.0.0.bb => libical_3.0.5.bb} (53%)meta/recipes-support/libical/libical/0001-CMakeLists.txt-libical.pc.in-fix-iculibs-remove-full.patch deleted +0 -44
@@ -1,44 +0,0 @@ -From 1a41069c0dc054e59cd76fc3d8cf7cc2a78b5e8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Allen Winter <[email protected]> -Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 16:56:29 -0400 -Subject: [PATCH] CMakeLists.txt, libical.pc.in - fix iculibs (remove full path) ISSUE: 227 - -Upstream-Status: Backport - -Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John <[email protected]> ----- -diff -Naur libical-2.0.0-orig/CMakeLists.txt libical-2.0.0/CMakeLists.txt ---- libical-2.0.0-orig/CMakeLists.txt 2016-09-08 18:05:06.166049345 +0300 -+++ libical-2.0.0/CMakeLists.txt 2016-09-08 18:05:45.201561334 +0300 -@@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ - # RSCALE info at http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7529 - find_package(ICU) - if(ICU_FOUND) -+ set(ICUUC_LIBS "-licuuc") #for libical.pc - set(HAVE_LIBICU 1) - if(ICU_MAJOR_VERSION VERSION_GREATER 50) - set(HAVE_ICU_DANGI TRUE) -@@ -137,6 +138,7 @@ - endif() - if(ICU_I18N_FOUND) - set(HAVE_LIBICU_I18N 1) -+ set(ICUI18N_LIBS "-licui18n") #for libical.pc - endif() - - # MSVC specific definitions -diff -Naur libical-2.0.0-orig/libical.pc.in libical-2.0.0/libical.pc.in ---- libical-2.0.0-orig/libical.pc.in 2015-12-28 23:44:53.000000000 +0200 -+++ libical-2.0.0/libical.pc.in 2016-09-08 18:09:12.991963597 +0300 -@@ -3,10 +3,10 @@ - libdir=@libdir@ - includedir=@includedir@ - threadslib=@PTHREAD_LIBS@ --iculib=@ICU_LIBRARIES@ @ICU_I18N_LIBRARIES@ -+iculibs=@ICUUC_LIBS@ @ICUI18N_LIBS@ - - Name: libical - Description: An implementation of basic iCAL protocols - Version: @VERSION@ --Libs: -L${libdir} -lical -licalss -licalvcal ${threadslib} ${iculib} -+Libs: -L${libdir} -lical -licalss -licalvcal ${threadslib} ${iculibs} - Cflags: -I${includedir}
meta/recipes-support/libical/libical_3.0.5.bb renamed from meta/recipes-support/libical/libical_2.0.0.bb +12 -8
@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@ SUMMARY = "iCal and scheduling (RFC 2445, 2446, 2447) library" HOMEPAGE = "https://github.com/libical/libical" BUGTRACKER = "https://github.com/libical/libical/issues" -LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 | MPL-1.0" -LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=d4fc58309d8ed46587ac63bb449d82f8 \ - file://LICENSE;md5=d1a0891cd3e582b3e2ec8fe63badbbb6" +LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 | MPL-2" +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;md5=1910a2a76ddf6a9ba369182494170d87 \ + file://LICENSE.LGPL21.txt;md5=933adb561f159e7c3da079536f0ed871 \ + file://LICENSE.MPL2.txt;md5=9741c346eef56131163e13b9db1241b3" SECTION = "libs" -SRC_URI = "https://github.com/${BPN}/${BPN}/releases/download/v${PV}/${BP}.tar.gz \ - file://0001-CMakeLists.txt-libical.pc.in-fix-iculibs-remove-full.patch \ - " +SRC_URI = "https://github.com/${BPN}/${BPN}/releases/download/v${PV}/${BP}.tar.gz" + DEPENDS = "icu" -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "6bf8e5f5a3ba88baf390d0134e05d76e" -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "654c11f759c19237be39f6ad401d917e5a05f36f1736385ed958e60cf21456da" +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "9be4e8a1739a9c27e06aa8ce66b8cb34" +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "7ad550c8c49c9b9983658e3ab3e68b1eee2439ec17b169a6b1e6ecb5274e78e6" UPSTREAM_CHECK_URI = "https://github.com/libical/libical/releases" inherit cmake pkgconfig
@@ -20,6 +20,10 @@ inherit cmake pkgconfig # No need to use perl-native, the host perl is sufficient. EXTRA_OECMAKE += "-DPERL_EXECUTABLE=${HOSTTOOLS_DIR}/perl" +# The glib library can't be cross-compiled, disable for now. +# https://github.com/libical/libical/issues/394 +EXTRA_OECMAKE += "-DICAL_GLIB=false" + do_install_append_class-target () { # Remove build host references sed -i \
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
Quoted 7 lines · Ross Burton
(quoted diff) +0
-2-LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 | MPL-1.0" -LIC_FILES_CHKSUM ="file://COPYING;md5=d4fc58309d8ed46587ac63bb449d82f8 \
- file://LICENSE;md5=d1a0891cd3e582b3e2ec8fe63badbbb6"(quoted diff) +2
-0+LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 | MPL-2" +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
Quoted 5 lines
"file://LICENSE;md5=1910a2a76ddf6a9ba369182494170d87 \
+ file://LICENSE.LGPL21.txt;md5=933adb561f159e7c3da079536f0ed871 \
+ file://LICENSE.MPL2.txt;md5=9741c346eef56131163e13b9db1241b3"
Should this be MPL-2.0 instead? This is causing warnings:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/37/builds/862/steps/8/logs/warnings
Thanks,
Anuj
Quoted 3 lines · Anuj
Quoted 1 line · Ross Burton
-LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 | MPL-1.0"
this should be MPL-2.0 | LGPL-2.1
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
-LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=d4fc58309d8ed46587ac63bb449d82f8 \
- file://LICENSE;md5=d1a0891cd3e582b3e2ec8fe63badbbb6" +LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 | MPL-2"
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;md5=1910a2a76ddf6a9ba369182494170d87 \
+ file://LICENSE.LGPL21.txt;md5=933adb561f159e7c3da079536f0ed871 \
+ file://LICENSE.MPL2.txt;md5=9741c346eef56131163e13b9db1241b3"Should this be MPL-2.0 instead? This is causing warnings:
the license is MPL-2.0 but the license file name is MPL2.txt so this seems fine.
Quoted 12 lines
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/37/builds/862/steps/8/logs/warnings
Thanks,
Anuj--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Quoted 21 lines · Khem Raj
Quoted 2 lines · Anuj
Quoted 1 line · Ross Burton
-LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 | MPL-1.0"
this should be MPL-2.0 | LGPL-2.1
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
-LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=d4fc58309d8ed46587ac63bb449d82f8 \
- file://LICENSE;md5=d1a0891cd3e582b3e2ec8fe63badbbb6" +LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 | MPL-2"Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;md5=1910a2a76ddf6a9ba369182494170d87 \
+ file://LICENSE.LGPL21.txt;md5=933adb561f159e7c3da079536f0ed871 \
+ file://LICENSE.MPL2.txt;md5=9741c346eef56131163e13b9db1241b3"Should this be MPL-2.0 instead? This is causing warnings:
Quoted 2 lines
the license is MPL-2.0 but the license file name is MPL2.txt so this seems fine.
I meant the field in LICENSE. Quoted the wrong text.
Thanks.
Quoted 23 lines · Anuj
Quoted 21 lines · Khem Raj
Quoted 2 lines · Anuj
Quoted 1 line · Ross Burton
-LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 | MPL-1.0"
this should be MPL-2.0 | LGPL-2.1
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 11 lines
-LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=d4fc58309d8ed46587ac63bb449d82f8 \
- file://LICENSE;md5=d1a0891cd3e582b3e2ec8fe63badbbb6"(quoted diff) +2
-0+LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 | MPL-2" +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM ="file://LICENSE;md5=1910a2a76ddf6a9ba369182494170d87 \
+ file://LICENSE.LGPL21.txt;md5=933adb561f159e7c3da079536f0ed871 \
+ file://LICENSE.MPL2.txt;md5=9741c346eef56131163e13b9db1241b3"Should this be MPL-2.0 instead? This is causing warnings:
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
the license is MPL-2.0 but the license file name is MPL2.txt so this seems fine.
I meant the field in LICENSE. Quoted the wrong text.
reply quote confused me. yes it is wrong. It should be MPL-2.0
Quoted 2 lines
Thanks.
this is causing a failure in meta-xfce
https://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/253910/
Quoted 34 lines · Khem Raj
Quoted 23 lines · Anuj
Quoted 21 lines · Khem Raj
Quoted 2 lines · Anuj
Quoted 1 line · Ross Burton
-LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 | MPL-1.0"
this should be MPL-2.0 | LGPL-2.1
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 11 lines
-LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=d4fc58309d8ed46587ac63bb449d82f8 \
- file://LICENSE;md5=d1a0891cd3e582b3e2ec8fe63badbbb6"(quoted diff) +2
-0+LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 | MPL-2" +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM ="file://LICENSE;md5=1910a2a76ddf6a9ba369182494170d87 \
+ file://LICENSE.LGPL21.txt;md5=933adb561f159e7c3da079536f0ed871 \
+ file://LICENSE.MPL2.txt;md5=9741c346eef56131163e13b9db1241b3"Should this be MPL-2.0 instead? This is causing warnings:
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
the license is MPL-2.0 but the license file name is MPL2.txt so this seems fine.
I meant the field in LICENSE. Quoted the wrong text.
reply quote confused me. yes it is wrong. It should be MPL-2.0
Quoted 2 lines
Thanks.
The last release of Orage was four years ago: I suggest removing that from meta-xfce instead of keeping everyone else using an old version of libical.
Ross
Quoted 40 lines · Khem Raj
this is causing a failure in meta-xfce
https://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/253910/
Quoted 34 lines · Khem Raj
Quoted 23 lines · Anuj
Quoted 21 lines · Khem Raj
Quoted 2 lines · Anuj
Quoted 1 line · Ross Burton
-LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 | MPL-1.0"
this should be MPL-2.0 | LGPL-2.1
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 11 lines
-LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=d4fc58309d8ed46587ac63bb449d82f8 \
- file://LICENSE;md5=d1a0891cd3e582b3e2ec8fe63badbbb6"(quoted diff) +2
-0+LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 | MPL-2" +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM ="file://LICENSE;md5=1910a2a76ddf6a9ba369182494170d87 \
+ file://LICENSE.LGPL21.txt;md5=933adb561f159e7c3da079536f0ed871 \
+ file://LICENSE.MPL2.txt;md5=9741c346eef56131163e13b9db1241b3"Should this be MPL-2.0 instead? This is causing warnings:
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
the license is MPL-2.0 but the license file name is MPL2.txt so this seems fine.
I meant the field in LICENSE. Quoted the wrong text.
reply quote confused me. yes it is wrong. It should be MPL-2.0
Quoted 2 lines
Thanks.
Quoted 4 lines · Ross
The last release of Orage was four years ago: I suggest removing that from meta-xfce instead of keeping everyone else using an old version of libical.
thats the latest unfortunately. I think a simple fix would be to drop is_utc field setting
in orage since it seems to gone in libical3, I will try to cookup a patch and try
Quoted 44 lines
Ross
Quoted 40 lines · Khem Raj
this is causing a failure in meta-xfce
https://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/253910/
Quoted 34 lines · Khem Raj
Quoted 23 lines · Anuj
Quoted 21 lines · Khem Raj
Quoted 2 lines · Anuj
Quoted 1 line · Ross Burton
-LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 | MPL-1.0"
this should be MPL-2.0 | LGPL-2.1
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 11 lines
-LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=d4fc58309d8ed46587ac63bb449d82f8 \
- file://LICENSE;md5=d1a0891cd3e582b3e2ec8fe63badbbb6"(quoted diff) +2
-0+LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 | MPL-2" +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM ="file://LICENSE;md5=1910a2a76ddf6a9ba369182494170d87 \
+ file://LICENSE.LGPL21.txt;md5=933adb561f159e7c3da079536f0ed871 \
+ file://LICENSE.MPL2.txt;md5=9741c346eef56131163e13b9db1241b3"Should this be MPL-2.0 instead? This is causing warnings:
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
the license is MPL-2.0 but the license file name is MPL2.txt so this seems fine.
I meant the field in LICENSE. Quoted the wrong text.
reply quote confused me. yes it is wrong. It should be MPL-2.0
Quoted 2 lines
Thanks.
Quoted 12 lines · Khem Raj
Quoted 4 lines · Ross
The last release of Orage was four years ago: I suggest removing that from meta-xfce instead of keeping everyone else using an old version of libical.
thats the latest unfortunately. I think a simple fix would be to drop
is_utcfield setting
in orage since it seems to gone in libical3, I will try to cookup a patch and try
sent here
https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/163311/
we can merge libical3 update
Quoted 44 lines
Quoted 44 lines
Ross
Quoted 40 lines · Khem Raj
this is causing a failure in meta-xfce
https://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/253910/
Quoted 34 lines · Khem Raj
Quoted 23 lines · Anuj
Quoted 21 lines · Khem Raj
Quoted 2 lines · Anuj
Quoted 1 line · Ross Burton
-LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 | MPL-1.0"
this should be MPL-2.0 | LGPL-2.1
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 11 lines
-LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=d4fc58309d8ed46587ac63bb449d82f8 \
- file://LICENSE;md5=d1a0891cd3e582b3e2ec8fe63badbbb6"(quoted diff) +2
-0+LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 | MPL-2" +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM ="file://LICENSE;md5=1910a2a76ddf6a9ba369182494170d87 \
+ file://LICENSE.LGPL21.txt;md5=933adb561f159e7c3da079536f0ed871 \
+ file://LICENSE.MPL2.txt;md5=9741c346eef56131163e13b9db1241b3"Should this be MPL-2.0 instead? This is causing warnings:
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
the license is MPL-2.0 but the license file name is MPL2.txt so this seems fine.
I meant the field in LICENSE. Quoted the wrong text.
reply quote confused me. yes it is wrong. It should be MPL-2.0
Quoted 2 lines
Thanks.