Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Documentation: filesystem: fix "Removed Sysctls" table

PATCH Applied Sheriff Esseson 3 participants 6 messages Jul 23, 2019 – Jul 26, 2019

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 Documentation: filesystem: fix "Removed Sysctls" table

the "Removed Sysctls" section is a table - bring it alive with ReST.

Signed-off-by Sheriff Esseson <sheriffesseson at gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/admin-guide/xfs.rst | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Documentation/admin-guide/xfs.rst +3 -2
index e76665a8f2f2..fb5b39f73059 100644
@@ -337,11 +337,12 @@ None at present.
 Removed Sysctls
 ===============
 
+=============================	=======
   Name				Removed
-  ----				-------
+=============================	=======
   fs.xfs.xfsbufd_centisec	v4.0
   fs.xfs.age_buffer_centisecs	v4.0
-
+=============================	=======
 
 Error handling
 ==============
Signature · 1 line
2.22.0
maintainer
#1 lore raw
Quoted 3 lines · On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:48:13 +0100 Sheriff Esseson <sheriffesseson at…

the "Removed Sysctls" section is a table - bring it alive with ReST.

Signed-off-by Sheriff Esseson <sheriffesseson at gmail.com>

So this appears to be identical to the patch you sent three days ago; is there a reason why you are sending it again now?

Thanks,

jon

#2 lore raw
Quoted 5 lines · Jonathan Corbet
Quoted 2 lines · On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:48:13 +0100 Sheriff Esseson <sheriffesseson at…

the "Removed Sysctls" section is a table - bring it alive with ReST.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Sheriff Esseson <sheriffesseson at gmail.com>

So this appears to be identical to the patch you sent three days ago; is there a reason why you are sending it again now?

Thanks,

jon

Sorry, I was think the patch went unnoticed during the merge window - I could not find a response.

#3 lore raw
Quoted 11 lines · Sheriff Esseson
Quoted 10 lines · Jonathan Corbet
Quoted 3 lines · On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:48:13 +0100 Sheriff Esseson <sheriffesseson at…

the "Removed Sysctls" section is a table - bring it alive with ReST.

Signed-off-by Sheriff Esseson <sheriffesseson at gmail.com>

So this appears to be identical to the patch you sent three days ago; is there a reason why you are sending it again now?

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Thanks,

jon

Sorry, I was think the patch went unnoticed during the merge window - I could not find a response.

The correct thing to do in that case is to reply to the original patch and ask if it has been looked at. The usual way of doing this is quoting the commit message and replying with a "Ping?" comment to bump it back to the top of everyone's mail stacks.

But, again, 3 days is not a long time, people tend to be extremely busy and might take a few days to get to reviewing non-critical changes, and people may not even review patches during the merge window. I'd suggest waiting a week before pinging a patch you've sent if there's been no response....

Cheers,

Dave.

Signature · 2 lines
Dave Chinner
david at fromorbit.com
#4 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 Documentation: filesystem: fix "Removed Sysctls" table

Quoted 24 lines · Dave Chinner
Quoted 11 lines · Sheriff Esseson
Quoted 10 lines · Jonathan Corbet
Quoted 3 lines · On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:48:13 +0100 Sheriff Esseson <sheriffesseson at…

the "Removed Sysctls" section is a table - bring it alive with ReST.

Signed-off-by Sheriff Esseson <sheriffesseson at gmail.com>

So this appears to be identical to the patch you sent three days ago; is there a reason why you are sending it again now?

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Thanks,

jon

Sorry, I was think the patch went unnoticed during the merge window - I could not find a response.

The correct thing to do in that case is to reply to the original patch and ask if it has been looked at. The usual way of doing this is quoting the commit message and replying with a "Ping?" comment to bump it back to the top of everyone's mail stacks.

Quoted 5 lines

But, again, 3 days is not a long time, people tend to be extremely busy and might take a few days to get to reviewing non-critical changes, and people may not even review patches during the merge window. I'd suggest waiting a week before pinging a patch you've sent if there's been no response....

Okay, Thanks Dave.

Quoted 7 lines

Cheers,

Dave.

Signature · 2 lines
Dave Chinner
david at fromorbit.com
maintainer Applied
#5 lore raw
In reply to Sheriff Esseson
Quoted 13 lines · On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:48:13 +0100 Sheriff Esseson <sheriffesseson at…

the "Removed Sysctls" section is a table - bring it alive with ReST.

Signed-off-by Sheriff Esseson <sheriffesseson at gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/admin-guide/xfs.rst | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Documentation/admin-guide/xfs.rst +0 -0
index e76665a8f2f2..fb5b39f73059 100644
@@ -337,11 +337,12 @@ None at present.
 Removed Sysctls

Documentation/admin-guide/xfs.rst None at present. · line 345

Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/admin-guide/xfs.rst +3 -2
 ===============
 
+=============================	=======
   Name				Removed
-  ----				-------
+=============================	=======
   fs.xfs.xfsbufd_centisec	v4.0
   fs.xfs.age_buffer_centisecs	v4.0
-
+=============================	=======

I've applied this, thanks.

jon