v4.19.50-cip3-rt2
Hi!
4.19.50-cip3-rt2 should be available at kernel.org. It performs well on socfpga (Altera-Terasic-Deo-NanoAltera); but not so well on iwg20m (r8a7743-iwg20d-q7) board.
Trees are available at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git/log/?h=linux-4.19.y-cip-rt-rebase
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git/log/?h=linux-4.19.y-cip-rt
And their content should be identical. I attempted to tag it in a way consistent with previous releases, and I attempted to sign a tag.
Best regards,
Pavel
Signature · 9 lines
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.cip-project.org/pipermail/cip-dev/attachments/20190723/e2d816ca/attachment.sig>
Quoted 6 lines · Pavel Machek
Hi!
4.19.50-cip3-rt2 should be available at kernel.org. It performs well on socfpga (Altera-Terasic-Deo-NanoAltera); but not so well on iwg20m (r8a7743-iwg20d-q7) board.
Thanks!
Quoted 8 lines
Trees are available at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git/log/?h=linux-4.19.y-cip-rt-rebase
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git/log/?h=linux-4.19.y-cip-rt
And their content should be identical. I attempted to tag it in a way consistent with previous releases, and I attempted to sign a tag.
...but you didn't push the tag yet? Or is this WiP?
Jan
Signature · 2 lines
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
Hi!
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Trees are available at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git/log/?h=linux-4.19.y-cip-rt-rebase
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git/log/?h=linux-4.19.y-cip-rt
And their content should be identical. I attempted to tag it in a way consistent with previous releases, and I attempted to sign a tag.
...but you didn't push the tag yet? Or is this WiP?
Sorry, I forgot I need to push the tag. It should be fixed now.
Best regards,
Pavel
Signature · 9 lines
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.cip-project.org/pipermail/cip-dev/attachments/20190723/9d168c33/attachment.sig>
I finally was able to make the viable .config... For the previous rt-kernel for BBB.
root at beaglebone:~# uname -a
Linux beaglebone 4.19.13-cip1-rt1 #1 PREEMPT RT Tue Jul 23 12:18:18 GMT 2019 armv7l GNU/Linux
It was very tough and rough... But I have it! Now I need to abandon this effort, since I have another immediate things to do!
Well...
Zoran
_______
Quoted 25 lines · Pavel Machek
Hi!
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Trees are available at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git/log/?h=linux-4.19.y-cip-rt-rebase
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git/log/?h=linux-4.19.y-cip-rt
And their content should be identical. I attempted to tag it in a way consistent with previous releases, and I attempted to sign a tag.
...but you didn't push the tag yet? Or is this WiP?
Sorry, I forgot I need to push the tag. It should be fixed now.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
_______________________________________________
cip-dev mailing list
cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev
Hi!
Quoted 9 lines
I finally was able to make the viable .config... For the previous rt-kernel for BBB.
root at beaglebone:~# uname -a
Linux beaglebone 4.19.13-cip1-rt1 #1 PREEMPT RT Tue Jul 23 12:18:18 GMT 2019 armv7l GNU/LinuxIt was very tough and rough... But I have it! Now I need to abandon this effort, since I have another immediate things to do!
No problem. You should be able to use same .config with the new kernel...
Best regards,
Pavel
Signature · 9 lines
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.cip-project.org/pipermail/cip-dev/attachments/20190724/6b99cda7/attachment-0001.sig>
Quoted 2 lines
No problem. You should be able to use same .config with the new kernel...
U R targeting 4.19.50-cip3-rt2... I do agree 100%, but I have some problems to do rt-tests (connecting BBB target to my VM).
Please, stay tuned. I'll resolve these problems ASAP (if ?, then Ill publish the results) . Then I need to leave it for the time been.
Zoran
_______
Quoted 21 lines · Pavel Machek
Hi!
Quoted 9 lines
I finally was able to make the viable .config... For the previous rt-kernel for BBB.
root at beaglebone:~# uname -a
Linux beaglebone 4.19.13-cip1-rt1 #1 PREEMPT RT Tue Jul 23 12:18:18 GMT 2019 armv7l GNU/LinuxIt was very tough and rough... But I have it! Now I need to abandon this effort, since I have another immediate things to do!
No problem. You should be able to use same .config with the new kernel...
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
(limitations): I could NOT connect with ETH to target (something is wrongly set with my local.conf for YOCTO rootfs)...
Here is my approximate recipe for rootfs I am using for the test (initramfs) for your inspection (it is thud, local.conf moved to warrior):
https://github.com/ZoranStojsavljevic/bbb-yocto/blob/master/bbb-releases/bbb-warrior/local.conf
More or/and less, here are results after approximately 63 minutes of running rt-tests:
root at beaglebone:~# uname -a
Linux beaglebone 4.19.13-cip1-rt1 #1 PREEMPT RT Tue Jul 23 12:18:18 GMT 2019 armv7l GNU/Linux
_______
policy: fifo: loadavg: 291.28 287.63 267.78 21/486 30014
policy: fifo: loadavg: 186.97 215.90 243.41 5/458 22788
policy: fifo: loadavg: 248.16 243.95 244.63 194/486 8800
policy: fifo: loadavg: 283.55 240.50 243.74 9/318 2383
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C:3942593 Min: 19 Act: 52 Avg: 45 Max: 93
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C:3785664 Min: 19 Act: 44 Avg: 45 Max: 935
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C:3716107 Min: 19 Act: 60 Avg: 45 Max: 936
policy: fifo: loadavg: 222.11 176.72 90.66 5/213 21249
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C:2213895 Min: 19 Act: 38 Avg: 46 Max: 905
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C: 181403 Min: 21 Act: 49 Avg: 45 Max: 90
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C: 181320 Min: 21 Act: 29 Avg: 45 Max: 90
MIN 19 ns, MAX 936 ns (3x over 900 ns)... I would be really concerned about MAX over > 900 ns!
On 4.4 RT kernel I had some much better # such as: Min: 19 Act:
44 Avg: 42 Max: 81
I need to do more... No time anymore now!
Best Regards,
Zoran
_______
Quoted 35 lines · Zoran S
Quoted 3 lines
No problem. You should be able to use same .config with the new kernel...
U R targeting 4.19.50-cip3-rt2... I do agree 100%, but I have some problems to do rt-tests (connecting BBB target to my VM).
Please, stay tuned. I'll resolve these problems ASAP (if ?, then Ill publish the results) . Then I need to leave it for the time been.
Zoran
_______Quoted 21 lines · Pavel Machek
Hi!
Quoted 9 lines
I finally was able to make the viable .config... For the previous rt-kernel for BBB.
root at beaglebone:~# uname -a
Linux beaglebone 4.19.13-cip1-rt1 #1 PREEMPT RT Tue Jul 23 12:18:18 GMT 2019 armv7l GNU/LinuxIt was very tough and rough... But I have it! Now I need to abandon this effort, since I have another immediate things to do!
No problem. You should be able to use same .config with the new kernel...
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Hello Zoran
Quoted 3 lines
From: cip-dev-bounces at lists.cip-project.org <cip-dev- (limitations): I could NOT connect with ETH to target (something is wrongly set with my local.conf for YOCTO rootfs)...
Why don't you use ISAR CIP Core?
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-core/isar-cip-core
Thanks,
Daniel
Quoted 79 lines
Here is my approximate recipe for rootfs I am using for the test (initramfs) for your inspection (it is thud, local.conf moved to warrior):
https://github.com/ZoranStojsavljevic/bbb-yocto/blob/master/bbb-releases/bbb-warrior/local.confMore or/and less, here are results after approximately 63 minutes of running rt-tests:
root at beaglebone:~# uname -a
Linux beaglebone 4.19.13-cip1-rt1 #1 PREEMPT RT Tue Jul 23 12:18:18 GMT 2019 armv7l GNU/Linux
_______
policy: fifo: loadavg: 291.28 287.63 267.78 21/486 30014
policy: fifo: loadavg: 186.97 215.90 243.41 5/458 22788
policy: fifo: loadavg: 248.16 243.95 244.63 194/486 8800
policy: fifo: loadavg: 283.55 240.50 243.74 9/318 2383
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C:3942593 Min: 19 Act: 52 Avg: 45 Max: 93
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C:3785664 Min: 19 Act: 44 Avg: 45 Max: 935
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C:3716107 Min: 19 Act: 60 Avg: 45 Max: 936
policy: fifo: loadavg: 222.11 176.72 90.66 5/213 21249
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C:2213895 Min: 19 Act: 38 Avg: 46 Max: 905
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C: 181403 Min: 21 Act: 49 Avg: 45 Max: 90
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C: 181320 Min: 21 Act: 29 Avg: 45 Max: 90MIN 19 ns, MAX 936 ns (3x over 900 ns)... I would be really concerned about MAX over > 900 ns!
On 4.4 RT kernel I had some much better # such as: Min: 19 Act:
44 Avg: 42 Max: 81I need to do more... No time anymore now!
Best Regards,
Zoran
_______Quoted 7 lines · Zoran S
Quoted 3 lines
No problem. You should be able to use same .config with the new kernel...
U R targeting 4.19.50-cip3-rt2... I do agree 100%, but I have some problems to do rt-tests (connecting BBB target to my VM).
Quoted 28 lines
Please, stay tuned. I'll resolve these problems ASAP (if ?, then Ill publish the results) . Then I need to leave it for the time been.
Zoran
_______Quoted 21 lines · Pavel Machek
Hi!
Quoted 9 lines
I finally was able to make the viable .config... For the previous rt-kernel for BBB.
root at beaglebone:~# uname -a
Linux beaglebone 4.19.13-cip1-rt1 #1 PREEMPT RT Tue Jul 23 12:18:18 GMT 2019 armv7l GNU/LinuxIt was very tough and rough... But I have it! Now I need to abandon this effort, since I have another immediate things to do!
No problem. You should be able to use same .config with the new kernel...
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany_______________________________________________
cip-dev mailing list
cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev
Quoted 2 lines
Why don't you use ISAR CIP Core?
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-core/isar-cip-core
With all due respect (and I do really respect prominent CIP founders), I need to make this problem solved solely by myself...
But, anyway, thank you for the advise! :-)
Zoran
_______
Quoted 92 lines · On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 2:22 AM <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello Zoran
Quoted 3 lines
From: cip-dev-bounces at lists.cip-project.org <cip-dev- (limitations): I could NOT connect with ETH to target (something is wrongly set with my local.conf for YOCTO rootfs)...
Why don't you use ISAR CIP Core?
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-core/isar-cip-coreThanks,
DanielQuoted 79 lines
Here is my approximate recipe for rootfs I am using for the test (initramfs) for your inspection (it is thud, local.conf moved to warrior):
https://github.com/ZoranStojsavljevic/bbb-yocto/blob/master/bbb-releases/bbb-warrior/local.confMore or/and less, here are results after approximately 63 minutes of running rt-tests:
root at beaglebone:~# uname -a
Linux beaglebone 4.19.13-cip1-rt1 #1 PREEMPT RT Tue Jul 23 12:18:18 GMT 2019 armv7l GNU/Linux
_______
policy: fifo: loadavg: 291.28 287.63 267.78 21/486 30014
policy: fifo: loadavg: 186.97 215.90 243.41 5/458 22788
policy: fifo: loadavg: 248.16 243.95 244.63 194/486 8800
policy: fifo: loadavg: 283.55 240.50 243.74 9/318 2383
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C:3942593 Min: 19 Act: 52 Avg: 45 Max: 93
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C:3785664 Min: 19 Act: 44 Avg: 45 Max: 935
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C:3716107 Min: 19 Act: 60 Avg: 45 Max: 936
policy: fifo: loadavg: 222.11 176.72 90.66 5/213 21249
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C:2213895 Min: 19 Act: 38 Avg: 46 Max: 905
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C: 181403 Min: 21 Act: 49 Avg: 45 Max: 90
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C: 181320 Min: 21 Act: 29 Avg: 45 Max: 90MIN 19 ns, MAX 936 ns (3x over 900 ns)... I would be really concerned about MAX over > 900 ns!
On 4.4 RT kernel I had some much better # such as: Min: 19 Act:
44 Avg: 42 Max: 81I need to do more... No time anymore now!
Best Regards,
Zoran
_______Quoted 7 lines · Zoran S
Quoted 3 lines
No problem. You should be able to use same .config with the new kernel...
U R targeting 4.19.50-cip3-rt2... I do agree 100%, but I have some problems to do rt-tests (connecting BBB target to my VM).
Quoted 28 lines
Please, stay tuned. I'll resolve these problems ASAP (if ?, then Ill publish the results) . Then I need to leave it for the time been.
Zoran
_______Quoted 21 lines · Pavel Machek
Hi!
Quoted 9 lines
I finally was able to make the viable .config... For the previous rt-kernel for BBB.
root at beaglebone:~# uname -a
Linux beaglebone 4.19.13-cip1-rt1 #1 PREEMPT RT Tue Jul 23 12:18:18 GMT 2019 armv7l GNU/LinuxIt was very tough and rough... But I have it! Now I need to abandon this effort, since I have another immediate things to do!
No problem. You should be able to use same .config with the new kernel...
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany_______________________________________________
cip-dev mailing list
cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org
https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev
Quoted 11 lines · Zoran S
(limitations): I could NOT connect with ETH to target (something is wrongly set with my local.conf for YOCTO rootfs)...
Here is my approximate recipe for rootfs I am using for the test (initramfs) for your inspection (it is thud, local.conf moved to warrior):
https://github.com/ZoranStojsavljevic/bbb-yocto/blob/master/bbb-releases/bbb-warrior/local.confMore or/and less, here are results after approximately 63 minutes of running rt-tests:
Quoted 15 lines
root at beaglebone:~# uname -a
Linux beaglebone 4.19.13-cip1-rt1 #1 PREEMPT RT Tue Jul 23 12:18:18 GMT 2019 armv7l GNU/Linux
_______
policy: fifo: loadavg: 291.28 287.63 267.78 21/486 30014
policy: fifo: loadavg: 186.97 215.90 243.41 5/458 22788
policy: fifo: loadavg: 248.16 243.95 244.63 194/486 8800
policy: fifo: loadavg: 283.55 240.50 243.74 9/318 2383
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C:3942593 Min: 19 Act: 52 Avg: 45 Max: 93
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C:3785664 Min: 19 Act: 44 Avg: 45 Max: 935
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C:3716107 Min: 19 Act: 60 Avg: 45 Max: 936
policy: fifo: loadavg: 222.11 176.72 90.66 5/213 21249
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C:2213895 Min: 19 Act: 38 Avg: 46 Max: 905
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C: 181403 Min: 21 Act: 49 Avg: 45 Max: 90
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C: 181320 Min: 21 Act: 29 Avg: 45 Max: 90
Your log is corrupted, see?
If it was real, it would be
Max: 905
Max: 90
But you have
Max: 905 Max: 90
Notice the whitespace.
Quoted 2 lines
MIN 19 ns, MAX 936 ns (3x over 900 ns)... I would be really concerned about MAX over > 900 ns!
It is usec, not nsec, AFAICT.
Best regards,
Pavel
Signature · 9 lines
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.cip-project.org/pipermail/cip-dev/attachments/20190726/fc1ed8b0/attachment.sig>
Quoted 1 line
Your log is corrupted, see?
You are correct, I should write that these are preliminary WTH/ad-hoc results (I need to fix/rerun these in the correct setup, I know).
Quoted 1 line
It is usec, not nsec, AFAICT.
Again, correct. I wrote nsec instead usec, having in mind INTEL technology per asm instruction. INTEL illusions/delusions in my brain. I am trying to catch up on armv7, A8 and A9, since these gadgets started ruling the embedded industry.
Thank you,
Zoran
_______
Quoted 54 lines · Pavel Machek
Quoted 11 lines · Zoran S
(limitations): I could NOT connect with ETH to target (something is wrongly set with my local.conf for YOCTO rootfs)...
Here is my approximate recipe for rootfs I am using for the test (initramfs) for your inspection (it is thud, local.conf moved to warrior):
https://github.com/ZoranStojsavljevic/bbb-yocto/blob/master/bbb-releases/bbb-warrior/local.confMore or/and less, here are results after approximately 63 minutes of running rt-tests:
Quoted 15 lines
root at beaglebone:~# uname -a
Linux beaglebone 4.19.13-cip1-rt1 #1 PREEMPT RT Tue Jul 23 12:18:18 GMT 2019 armv7l GNU/Linux
_______
policy: fifo: loadavg: 291.28 287.63 267.78 21/486 30014
policy: fifo: loadavg: 186.97 215.90 243.41 5/458 22788
policy: fifo: loadavg: 248.16 243.95 244.63 194/486 8800
policy: fifo: loadavg: 283.55 240.50 243.74 9/318 2383
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C:3942593 Min: 19 Act: 52 Avg: 45 Max: 93
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C:3785664 Min: 19 Act: 44 Avg: 45 Max: 935
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C:3716107 Min: 19 Act: 60 Avg: 45 Max: 936
policy: fifo: loadavg: 222.11 176.72 90.66 5/213 21249
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C:2213895 Min: 19 Act: 38 Avg: 46 Max: 905
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C: 181403 Min: 21 Act: 49 Avg: 45 Max: 90
T: 0 (13903) P:80 I:1000 C: 181320 Min: 21 Act: 29 Avg: 45 Max: 90Your log is corrupted, see?
If it was real, it would be
Max: 905
Max: 90But you have
Max: 905 Max: 90Notice the whitespace.
Quoted 2 lines
MIN 19 ns, MAX 936 ns (3x over 900 ns)... I would be really concerned about MAX over > 900 ns!
It is usec, not nsec, AFAICT.
Best regards,
Pavel--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[cip-dev] [ANNOUNCE] v4.4.185-cip35-rt24
In reply to Pavel MachekHi!
v4.4.185-cip35-rt24 should be available at kernel.org.
Daniel says:
# in the v4.4-rt is still a problem with f01f17d3705b ("mm,
# vmstat: make quiet_vmstat lighter"). It is needed to boot on x86_64
# but it breaks on NVIDIA's boards, e.g. Jetson. Unfortunately, I don't
# have a NVIDIA board in my lab to figure out what is missing. So I
# suspect there is a still a problem hidden in the current v4.4-rt tree.I did nothing to solve that problem. If someone uses NVIDIA boards, let me know.
Trees are available at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git/log/?h=linux-4.4.y-cip-rt-rebase
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cip/linux-cip.git/log/?h=linux-4.4.y-cip-rt
And their content should be identical. It should be tagged and tag should be signed.
Best regards,
Pavel
Signature · 9 lines
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.cip-project.org/pipermail/cip-dev/attachments/20190723/c22183e0/attachment.sig>
[cip-dev] [ANNOUNCE] v4.4.185-cip35-rt24
Hi,
Quoted 11 lines · Pavel Machek
v4.4.185-cip35-rt24 should be available at kernel.org.
Daniel says:
# in the v4.4-rt is still a problem with f01f17d3705b ("mm, # vmstat: make quiet_vmstat lighter"). It is needed to boot on x86_64 # but it breaks on NVIDIA's boards, e.g. Jetson. Unfortunately, I don't # have a NVIDIA board in my lab to figure out what is missing. So I # suspect there is a still a problem hidden in the current v4.4-rt tree.I did nothing to solve that problem. If someone uses NVIDIA boards, let me know.
I still try to get hands on a NVIDIA board. They are not terrible expensive but I still don't want to buy it myself :)
So if someone is willing to lend me a board, I can't try to reproduce it.
Thanks,
Daniel
[cip-dev] [ANNOUNCE] v4.4.185-cip35-rt24
Quoted 12 lines · Daniel Wagner
Hi,
Quoted 9 lines · Pavel Machek
v4.4.185-cip35-rt24 should be available at kernel.org.
Daniel says:
# in the v4.4-rt is still a problem with f01f17d3705b ("mm, # vmstat: make quiet_vmstat lighter"). It is needed to boot on x86_64 # but it breaks on NVIDIA's boards, e.g. Jetson. Unfortunately, I don't # have a NVIDIA board in my lab to figure out what is missing. So I # suspect there is a still a problem hidden in the current v4.4-rt tree.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
I did nothing to solve that problem. If someone uses NVIDIA boards, let me know.
I still try to get hands on a NVIDIA board. They are not terrible expensive but I still don't want to buy it myself :)
So if someone is willing to lend me a board, I can't try to reproduce it.
Which one do you need? I have a TK1 in reach, Ralf should have a TX1 with the potential of remote access.
Jan
Signature · 2 lines
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
[cip-dev] [ANNOUNCE] v4.4.185-cip35-rt24
Hi Jan,
Quoted 4 lines · Jan Kiszka
Quoted 1 line
So if someone is willing to lend me a board, I can't try to reproduce it.
Which one do you need? I have a TK1 in reach, Ralf should have a TX1 with the potential of remote access.
It should be reproducable on a TK1:
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/f32de22f-c928-2eaa-ee3f-d2b26c184dd4 at nvidia.com/
So if I could get hands on one of those, it would really help.
Remote access is also good, if the uplink from the board is reasonable fast. I finally got a fast uplink (400MBit/s) :)
Thanks,
Daniel
[cip-dev] [ANNOUNCE] v4.4.185-cip35-rt24
Hi,
Quoted 9 lines · Daniel Wagner
Hi Jan,
Quoted 6 lines · Jan Kiszka
Quoted 2 lines
So if someone is willing to lend me a board, I can't try to reproduce it.
Which one do you need? I have a TK1 in reach, Ralf should have a TX1 with the
potential of remote access.
Yep, he does.
Quoted 7 lines
It should be reproducable on a TK1:
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/f32de22f-c928-2eaa-ee3f-d2b26c184dd4 at nvidia.com/
So if I could get hands on one of those, it would really help.
You can either get your hands dirty on your own, or you simply give me a .config together with a commit hash and a short description what I should test. The latter is probably the easier choice, if the test isn't that complex.
Quoted 3 lines
Remote access is also good, if the uplink from the board is reasonable fast. I finally got a fast uplink (400MBit/s) :)
Come on, 400Mbit/s... But it should be fast enough to tease our 1GBit/s DFN network ;-)
Ralf
Quoted 3 lines
Thanks,
Daniel
[cip-dev] [ANNOUNCE] v4.4.185-cip35-rt24
In reply to Daniel WagnerHi,
Quoted 1 line
It should be reproducable on a TK1:
Today I got from Jan the TK1 for testing. After the usual WTF with u-boot and kernel configs, I am able to reproduce it. Let's see what's going wrong.
Thanks,
Daniel
[cip-dev] [ANNOUNCE] v4.4.185-cip35-rt24
Quoted 1 line
Let's see what's going wrong.
Identified the problem. It was a missing dependency 587198ba5206 ("vmstat: Remove BUG_ON from vmstat_update").
Need to run a few more tests before sending Greg an updated series for stable v4.4.