Skip to contentSkip to conversation

kprobes, livepatch and FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY

DISCUSSION Joe Lawrence 2 participants 3 messages Jul 24, 2019 – Jul 25, 2019 Live patching

lore
Share & tools
lore

Joe Lawrence

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

Hi Masami,

I wanted to revisit FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY blocking of kprobes and livepatch, at least in cases where kprobe pre_handlers don't modify regs->ip.

(We've discussed this previously at part of a kpatch github issue #47:
https://github.com/dynup/kpatch/issues/47)

The particular use case I was wondering about was perf probing a particular function, then attempting to livepatch that same function:

% uname -r
5.3.0-rc1+

  % dmesg -C
  % perf probe --add cmdline_proc_show
  Added new event:
    probe:cmdline_proc_show (on cmdline_proc_show)

You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:

perf record -e probe:cmdline_proc_show -aR sleep 1

% perf record -e probe:cmdline_proc_show -aR sleep 30 &
[1] 1007
% insmod samples/livepatch/livepatch-sample.ko
insmod: ERROR: could not insert module samples/livepatch/livepatch-sample.ko: Device or resource busy % dmesg

  [  440.913962] livepatch_sample: tainting kernel with TAINT_LIVEPATCH
  [  440.917123] livepatch_sample: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel
  [  440.942493] livepatch: enabling patch 'livepatch_sample'
  [  440.943445] livepatch: failed to register ftrace handler for function 'cmdline_proc_show' (-16)
  [  440.944576] livepatch: failed to patch object 'vmlinux'
  [  440.945270] livepatch: failed to enable patch 'livepatch_sample'
  [  440.946085] livepatch: 'livepatch_sample': unpatching complete

This same behavior holds in reverse, if we want to probe a livepatched function:

  % insmod samples/livepatch/livepatch-sample.ko
  % perf probe --add cmdline_proc_show
  Added new event:
    probe:cmdline_proc_show (on cmdline_proc_show)

You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:

perf record -e probe:cmdline_proc_show -aR sleep 1

% perf record -e probe:cmdline_proc_show -aR sleep 30
Error:
The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 16 (Device or resource busy) for event (probe:cmdline_proc_show). /bin/dmesg | grep -i perf may provide additional information.

Now, if I read kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c :: kprobe_dispatcher() correctly, it's only going to return !0 (indicating a modified regs->ip) when kprobe_perf_func() returns !0, i.e. regs->ip changes over a call to trace_call_bpf().

Aside: should kprobe_ftrace_handler() check that FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY is set when a pre_handler returns !0?

In kpatch #47, Josh suggested:

- If a kprobe handler needs to modify IP, user sets KPROBE_FLAG_IPMODIFY flag to register_kprobe, and then kprobes sets FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY when registering with ftrace for that probe.

- If KPROBE_FLAG_IPMODIFY is not used, kprobe_ftrace_handler() can detect when a kprobe handler changes regs->ip and restore it to its original value (regs->ip = ip).

Is this something that could still be supported? In cases like perf probe, could we get away with not setting FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY? The current way that we're applying that flag, kprobes and livepatch are mutually exclusive (for the same function).

Regards,

-- Joe

#1 lore raw
Quoted 5 lines · On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:19:42 -0400 Joe Lawrence <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Masami,

I wanted to revisit FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY blocking of kprobes and livepatch, at least in cases where kprobe pre_handlers don't modify regs->ip.

OK, now I think we can pass a flag to kprobe_register() to modify regs->ip or not. Then we can introduce 2 different ftrace_ops for IPMODIFY or just requires REGS.

Quoted 49 lines

(We've discussed this previously at part of a kpatch github issue #47:
https://github.com/dynup/kpatch/issues/47)

The particular use case I was wondering about was perf probing a particular function, then attempting to livepatch that same function:

% uname -r
5.3.0-rc1+

  % dmesg -C
  % perf probe --add cmdline_proc_show
  Added new event:
    probe:cmdline_proc_show (on cmdline_proc_show)

You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:

perf record -e probe:cmdline_proc_show -aR sleep 1

% perf record -e probe:cmdline_proc_show -aR sleep 30 &
[1] 1007
% insmod samples/livepatch/livepatch-sample.ko
insmod: ERROR: could not insert module samples/livepatch/livepatch-sample.ko: Device or resource busy % dmesg

  [  440.913962] livepatch_sample: tainting kernel with TAINT_LIVEPATCH
  [  440.917123] livepatch_sample: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel
  [  440.942493] livepatch: enabling patch 'livepatch_sample'
  [  440.943445] livepatch: failed to register ftrace handler for function 'cmdline_proc_show' (-16)
  [  440.944576] livepatch: failed to patch object 'vmlinux'
  [  440.945270] livepatch: failed to enable patch 'livepatch_sample'
  [  440.946085] livepatch: 'livepatch_sample': unpatching complete

This same behavior holds in reverse, if we want to probe a livepatched function:

  % insmod samples/livepatch/livepatch-sample.ko
  % perf probe --add cmdline_proc_show
  Added new event:
    probe:cmdline_proc_show (on cmdline_proc_show)

You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:

perf record -e probe:cmdline_proc_show -aR sleep 1

% perf record -e probe:cmdline_proc_show -aR sleep 30
Error:
The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 16 (Device or resource busy) for event (probe:cmdline_proc_show). /bin/dmesg | grep -i perf may provide additional information.

Quoted 7 lines

Now, if I read kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c :: kprobe_dispatcher() correctly, it's only going to return !0 (indicating a modified regs->ip) when kprobe_perf_func() returns !0, i.e. regs->ip changes over a call to trace_call_bpf().

Aside: should kprobe_ftrace_handler() check that FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY is set when a pre_handler returns !0?

NO, that flag has been shared among all ftrace-based kprobes, and checked when registering. So what we need is to introduce a new kprobe flag which states that this kprobe doesn't modify regs->ip. And kprobe prepare 2 ftrace_ops 1 is for IPMODIFY and 1 is for !IPMODIFY.

Quoted 7 lines

In kpatch #47, Josh suggested:

- If a kprobe handler needs to modify IP, user sets KPROBE_FLAG_IPMODIFY flag to register_kprobe, and then kprobes sets FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY when registering with ftrace for that probe.

Quoted 8 lines

- If KPROBE_FLAG_IPMODIFY is not used, kprobe_ftrace_handler() can detect when a kprobe handler changes regs->ip and restore it to its original value (regs->ip = ip).

Is this something that could still be supported? In cases like perf probe, could we get away with not setting FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY? The current way that we're applying that flag, kprobes and livepatch are mutually exclusive (for the same function).

It is not supported yet. But I can make it. wait a bit :)

Thank you,

Quoted 4 lines

Regards,

-- Joe

Signature · 1 line
Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>
#2 lore raw

Hi Joe,

Quoted 4 lines · On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 09:32:08 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]> wrote:

NO, that flag has been shared among all ftrace-based kprobes, and checked when registering. So what we need is to introduce a new kprobe flag which states that this kprobe doesn't modify regs->ip. And kprobe prepare 2 ftrace_ops 1 is for IPMODIFY and 1 is for !IPMODIFY.

Ah, OK. We don't even need the new flag.

-----
The jump optimization changes the kprobe's pre_handler behavior. Without optimization, the pre_handler can change the kernel's execution path by changing regs->ip and returning 1. However, when the probe is optimized, that modification is ignored. Thus, if you want to tweak the kernel's execution path, you need to suppress optimization, using one of the following techniques:

- Specify an empty function for the kprobe's post_handler.

or

- Execute 'sysctl -w debug.kprobes_optimization=n'
-----

So if we remove latter one, all kprobes which change regs->ip must set a dummy post_handler.

Thank you,

Signature · 1 line
Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>