Revert "mmc: sdhci-tegra: drop ->get_ro() implementation"
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 Revert "mmc: sdhci-tegra: drop ->get_ro() implementation"
The WRITE_PROTECT bit is always in a "protected mode" on Tegra and WP-GPIO state need to be used instead. In a case of the GPIO absence, write-enable should be assumed. External SD is writable once again as a result of this patch because the offending commit changed behaviour for the case of a missing WP-GPIO to fall back to WRITE_PROTECT bit-checking, which is incorrect for Tegra.
--- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c +14 -0
@@ -258,6 +258,16 @@ static void tegra210_sdhci_writew(struct sdhci_host *host, u16 val, int reg) } } +static unsigned int tegra_sdhci_get_ro (struct sdhci_host *host) +{ +/* +* Write-enable shall be assumed if GPIO is missing in a board's +* device-tree because SDHCI's WRITE_PROTECT bit doesn't work on +* Tegra. +*/ +return mmc_gpio_get_ro (host->mmc); +} +static bool tegra_sdhci_is_pad_and_regulator_valid (struct sdhci_host *host) {struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host =sdhci_priv (host);
@@ -1224,6 +1234,7 @@ static const struct cqhci_host_ops sdhci_tegra_cqhci_ops = { };static const struct sdhci_ops tegra_sdhci_ops = { + .get_ro = tegra_sdhci_get_ro, .read_w = tegra_sdhci_readw, .write_l = tegra_sdhci_writel, .set_clock = tegra_sdhci_set_clock,
@@ -1279,6 +1290,7 @@ static const struct sdhci_tegra_soc_data soc_data_tegra30 = { };static const struct sdhci_ops tegra114_sdhci_ops = { + .get_ro = tegra_sdhci_get_ro, .read_w = tegra_sdhci_readw, .write_w = tegra_sdhci_writew, .write_l = tegra_sdhci_writel,
@@ -1332,6 +1344,7 @@ static const struct sdhci_tegra_soc_data soc_data_tegra124 = { };static const struct sdhci_ops tegra210_sdhci_ops = { + .get_ro = tegra_sdhci_get_ro, .read_w = tegra_sdhci_readw, .write_w = tegra210_sdhci_writew, .write_l = tegra_sdhci_writel,
@@ -1366,6 +1379,7 @@ static const struct sdhci_tegra_soc_data soc_data_tegra210 = { };static const struct sdhci_ops tegra186_sdhci_ops = { + .get_ro = tegra_sdhci_get_ro, .read_w = tegra_sdhci_readw, .write_l = tegra_sdhci_writel, .set_clock = tegra_sdhci_set_clock,
Signature · 1 line
2.22.0
Adrian Hunter
maintainerQuoted 10 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
The
WRITE_PROTECTbit is always in a "protected mode" on Tegra and WP-GPIO state need to be used instead. In a case of the GPIO absence, write-enable should be assumed. External SD is writable once again as a result of this patch because the offending commit changed behaviour for the case of a missing WP-GPIO to fall back toWRITE_PROTECTbit-checking, which is incorrect for Tegra.Cc [email protected] # v5.1+Fixes e8391453e27f ("mmc: sdhci-tegra: drop ->get_ro() implementation")Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
Can we get an Ack from someone from Nvidia
Quoted 58 lines
--- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c +14
-0@@ -258,6 +258,16 @@ static void tegra210_sdhci_writew(struct sdhci_host *host, u16 val, int reg) } } +static unsigned int tegra_sdhci_get_ro (struct sdhci_host *host) +{ +/* +* Write-enable shall be assumed if GPIO is missing in a board's +* device-tree because SDHCI's WRITE_PROTECT bit doesn't work on +* Tegra. +*/ +return mmc_gpio_get_ro (host->mmc); +} +static bool tegra_sdhci_is_pad_and_regulator_valid (struct sdhci_host *host) {struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host =sdhci_priv (host);@@ -1224,6 +1234,7 @@ static const struct cqhci_host_ops sdhci_tegra_cqhci_ops = { };static const struct sdhci_ops tegra_sdhci_ops = { + .get_ro = tegra_sdhci_get_ro, .read_w = tegra_sdhci_readw, .write_l = tegra_sdhci_writel, .set_clock = tegra_sdhci_set_clock,@@ -1279,6 +1290,7 @@ static const struct sdhci_tegra_soc_data soc_data_tegra30 = { };static const struct sdhci_ops tegra114_sdhci_ops = { + .get_ro = tegra_sdhci_get_ro, .read_w = tegra_sdhci_readw, .write_w = tegra_sdhci_writew, .write_l = tegra_sdhci_writel,@@ -1332,6 +1344,7 @@ static const struct sdhci_tegra_soc_data soc_data_tegra124 = { };static const struct sdhci_ops tegra210_sdhci_ops = { + .get_ro = tegra_sdhci_get_ro, .read_w = tegra_sdhci_readw, .write_w = tegra210_sdhci_writew, .write_l = tegra_sdhci_writel,@@ -1366,6 +1379,7 @@ static const struct sdhci_tegra_soc_data soc_data_tegra210 = { };static const struct sdhci_ops tegra186_sdhci_ops = { + .get_ro = tegra_sdhci_get_ro, .read_w = tegra_sdhci_readw, .write_l = tegra_sdhci_writel, .set_clock = tegra_sdhci_set_clock,
Quoted 7 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
The
WRITE_PROTECTbit is always in a "protected mode" on Tegra and WP-GPIO state need to be used instead. In a case of the GPIO absence, write-enable should be assumed. External SD is writable once again as a result of this patch because the offending commit changed behaviour for the case of a missing WP-GPIO to fall back toWRITE_PROTECTbit-checking, which is incorrect for Tegra.
Quoted 6 lines
Cc [email protected] # v5.1+Fixes e8391453e27f ("mmc: sdhci-tegra: drop ->get_ro() implementation")Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>--- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
Quoted 10 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
The
WRITE_PROTECTbit is always in a "protected mode" on Tegra and WP-GPIO state need to be used instead. In a case of the GPIO absence, write-enable should be assumed. External SD is writable once again as a result of this patch because the offending commit changed behaviour for the case of a missing WP-GPIO to fall back toWRITE_PROTECTbit-checking, which is incorrect for Tegra.Cc [email protected] # v5.1+Fixes e8391453e27f ("mmc: sdhci-tegra: drop ->get_ro() implementation")Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
Quoted 11 lines · Dmitry Osipenko
The
WRITE_PROTECTbit is always in a "protected mode" on Tegra and WP-GPIO state need to be used instead. In a case of the GPIO absence, write-enable should be assumed. External SD is writable once again as a result of this patch because the offending commit changed behaviour for the case of a missing WP-GPIO to fall back toWRITE_PROTECTbit-checking, which is incorrect for Tegra.Cc [email protected] # v5.1+Fixes e8391453e27f ("mmc: sdhci-tegra: drop ->get_ro() implementation")Signed-off-by Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
Applied for fixes, thanks!
Kind regards
Uffe
Quoted 60 lines
--- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c +14
-1@@ -258,6 +258,16 @@ static void tegra210_sdhci_writew(struct sdhci_host *host, u16 val, int reg) } } +static unsigned int tegra_sdhci_get_ro (struct sdhci_host *host) +{ +/* +* Write-enable shall be assumed if GPIO is missing in a board's +* device-tree because SDHCI's WRITE_PROTECT bit doesn't work on +* Tegra. +*/ +return mmc_gpio_get_ro (host->mmc); +} +static bool tegra_sdhci_is_pad_and_regulator_valid (struct sdhci_host *host) {struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host =sdhci_priv (host);@@ -1224,6 +1234,7 @@ static const struct cqhci_host_ops sdhci_tegra_cqhci_ops = { };static const struct sdhci_ops tegra_sdhci_ops = { + .get_ro = tegra_sdhci_get_ro, .read_w = tegra_sdhci_readw, .write_l = tegra_sdhci_writel, .set_clock = tegra_sdhci_set_clock,@@ -1279,6 +1290,7 @@ static const struct sdhci_tegra_soc_data soc_data_tegra30 = { };static const struct sdhci_ops tegra114_sdhci_ops = { + .get_ro = tegra_sdhci_get_ro, .read_w = tegra_sdhci_readw, .write_w = tegra_sdhci_writew, .write_l = tegra_sdhci_writel,@@ -1332,6 +1344,7 @@ static const struct sdhci_tegra_soc_data soc_data_tegra124 = { };static const struct sdhci_ops tegra210_sdhci_ops = { + .get_ro = tegra_sdhci_get_ro, .read_w = tegra_sdhci_readw, .write_w = tegra210_sdhci_writew, .write_l = tegra_sdhci_writel,@@ -1366,6 +1379,7 @@ static const struct sdhci_tegra_soc_data soc_data_tegra210 = { };static const struct sdhci_ops tegra186_sdhci_ops = { + .get_ro = tegra_sdhci_get_ro, .read_w = tegra_sdhci_readw, .write_l = tegra_sdhci_writel, .set_clock = tegra_sdhci_set_clock, --2.22.0