s390/bpf: use 32-bit index for tail calls
Subsystems (3)
Ilya Leoshkevich
maintainerPATCH 1/1 s390/bpf: use 32-bit index for tail calls
"p runtime/jit: pass > 32bit index to tail_call" fails when bpf_jit_enable=1, because the tail call is not executed.
This in turn is because the generated code assumes index is 64-bit, while it must be 32-bit, and as a result prog array bounds check fails, while it should pass. Even if bounds check would have passed, the code that follows uses 64-bit index to compute prog array offset.
Fix by using clrj instead of clgrj for comparing index with array size, and also by using llgfr for truncating index to 32 bits before using it to compute prog array offset.
--- arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +6 -4
@@ -1049,8 +1049,8 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp, int i/* llgf %w1,map.max_entries(%b2) */ EMIT6_DISP_LH (0xe3000000 ,0x0016 ,REG_W1 ,REG_0 ,BPF_REG_2 , offsetof(struct bpf_array, map.max_entries)); -/* clgrj %b3,%w1,0xa,label0: if %b3 >= %w1 goto out */ -EMIT6_PCREL_LABEL (0xec000000 ,0x0065 ,BPF_REG_3 , +/* clrj %b3,%w1,0xa,label0: if (u32)%b3 >= (u32)%w1 goto out */ +EMIT6_PCREL_LABEL (0xec000000 ,0x0077 ,BPF_REG_3 ,REG_W1 ,0 ,0xa );/*
@@ -1076,8 +1076,10 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp, int i* goto out; */ -/* sllg %r1,%b3,3: %r1 = index * 8 */ -EMIT6_DISP_LH (0xeb000000 ,0x000d ,REG_1 ,BPF_REG_3 ,REG_0 ,3 ); +/* llgfr %r1,%b3: %r1 = (u32) index */ +EMIT4 (0xb9160000 ,REG_1 ,BPF_REG_3 ); +/* sllg %r1,%r1,3: %r1 *= 8 */ +EMIT6_DISP_LH (0xeb000000 ,0x000d ,REG_1 ,REG_1 ,REG_0 ,3 );/* lg %r1,prog(%b2,%r1) */ EMIT6_DISP_LH (0xe3000000 ,0x0004 ,REG_1 ,BPF_REG_2 ,REG_1 , offsetof(struct bpf_array , ptrs));
Signature · 1 line
2.21.0
Quoted 8 lines · Ilya Leoshkevich
"p runtime/jit: pass > 32bit index to
tail_call" fails when bpf_jit_enable=1, because the tail call is not executed.This in turn is because the generated code assumes index is 64-bit, while it must be 32-bit, and as a result prog array bounds check fails, while it should pass. Even if bounds check would have passed, the code that follows uses 64-bit index to compute prog array offset.
Quoted 8 lines
Fix by using clrj instead of clgrj for comparing index with array size, and also by using llgfr for truncating index to 32 bits before using it to compute prog array offset.
Fixes 6651ee070b31 ("s390/bpf: implement bpf_tail_call() helper")Reported-by Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]>Acked-by Vasily Gorbik <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Ilya Leoshkevich <[email protected]>
Applied, thanks!