mm/usercopy: use memory range to be accessed for wraparound check
PATCH 1/1 mm/usercopy: use memory range to be accessed for wraparound check
From: Prasad Sodagudi <[email protected]>
commit 951531691c4bcaa59f56a316e018bc2ff1ddf855 upstream.
Currently, when checking to see if accessing n bytes starting at address "ptr" will cause a wraparound in the memory addresses, the check in check_bogus_address() adds an extra byte, which is incorrect, as the range of addresses that will be accessed is [ptr, ptr + (n - 1)].
This can lead to incorrectly detecting a wraparound in the memory address, when trying to read 4 KB from memory that is mapped to the the last possible page in the virtual address space, when in fact, accessing that range of memory would not cause a wraparound to occur.
Use the memory range that will actually be accessed when considering if accessing a certain amount of bytes will cause the memory address to wrap around.
--- mm/usercopy.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
mm/usercopy.c +1 -1
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static inline const char *check_kernel_text_object(const void *ptr,static inline const char *check_bogus_address (const void *ptr,unsigned long n) {/* Reject if object wraps past end of memory. */ -if ((unsigned long )ptr + n < (unsigned long )ptr) +if ((unsigned long )ptr + (n -1 ) < (unsigned long )ptr)return "<wrapped address>" ;/* Reject if NULL or ZERO-allocation. */
Signature · 5 lines
2.17.1 -- Kees Cook
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerQuoted 18 lines · Kees Cook
From: Prasad Sodagudi <[email protected]>
commit
951531691c4bcaa59f56a316e018bc2ff1ddf855upstream.Currently, when checking to see if accessing n bytes starting at address "ptr" will cause a wraparound in the memory addresses, the check in
check_bogus_address()adds an extra byte, which is incorrect, as the range of addresses that will be accessed is [ptr, ptr + (n - 1)].This can lead to incorrectly detecting a wraparound in the memory address, when trying to read 4 KB from memory that is mapped to the the last possible page in the virtual address space, when in fact, accessing that range of memory would not cause a wraparound to occur.
Use the memory range that will actually be accessed when considering if accessing a certain amount of bytes will cause the memory address to wrap around.
Quoted 14 lines
Fixes f5509cc18daa ("mm: Hardened usercopy")Signed-off-by Prasad Sodagudi <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Isaac J. Manjarres <[email protected]>Co-developed-by Prasad Sodagudi <[email protected]>Reviewed-by William Kucharski <[email protected]>Acked-by Kees Cook <[email protected]>Cc Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>Cc Trilok Soni <[email protected]>Cc <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Andrew Morton <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>[kees: backport to v4.14]Signed-off-by Kees Cook <[email protected]>
This and the 4.9 patch now queued up, thanks for the backports.
greg k-h