rtc: use timeu64_t for range_max
PATCH 1/1 rtc: use timeu64_t for range_max
Hi,
for rtc drivers where rtc->range_max is set U64_MAX, like the PS3 rtc, rtc_valid_range() always returns -ERANGE. This is because the local variable range_max has type time64_t, so the test
if (time < range_min || time > range_max) return -ERANGE;
becomes (time < range_min || time > -1), which always evaluates to true. timeu64_t should be used, since it's the type of rtc->range_max.
Signed-off-by Emmanuel Nicolet <[email protected]>
--- drivers/rtc/interface.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/rtc/interface.c +1 -1
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static int rtc_valid_range(struct rtc_device *rtc, struct rtc_time *tm)time64_t time =rtc_tm_to_time64 (tm);time64_t range_min = rtc->set_start_time ? rtc->start_secs : rtc->range_min; -time64_t range_max = rtc->set_start_time ? +timeu64_t range_max = rtc->set_start_time ? (rtc->start_secs + rtc->range_max - rtc->range_min) : rtc->range_max;
Signature · 1 line
2.23.0
Quoted 6 lines · Emmanuel Nicolet
Hi,
for rtc drivers wherertc->range_maxis setU64_MAX, like the PS3 rtc,rtc_valid_range()always returns-ERANGE. This is because the local variablerange_maxhas typetime64_t, so the testif (time < range_min || time > range_max) return -ERANGE;
Quoted 8 lines
becomes (time <
range_min|| time > -1), which always evaluates to true.timeu64_tshould be used, since it's the type ofrtc->range_max.Signed-off-by Emmanuel Nicolet <[email protected]>--- drivers/rtc/interface.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied, thanks.
Signature · 3 lines
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com