Skip to contentSkip to conversation

x86/mm: Split vmalloc_sync_all()

PATCH Superseded Joerg Roedel 3 participants 3 messages Oct 7, 2019

Subsystems (7)
Memory management x86 ACPI x86 MM +3 more subsystems

v1 of 2 Superseded Latest is v2 →

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 x86/mm: Split vmalloc_sync_all()

From: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]>

Git commit 3f8fd02b1bf1 ("mm/vmalloc: Sync unmappings in __purge_vmap_area_lazy()") introduced a call to vmalloc_sync_all() in the vunmap() code-path. While this change was necessary to maintain correctness on x86-32-pae kernels, it also adds additional cycles for architectures that don't need it.

Specifically on x86-64 with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK=y some people reported severe performance regressions in micro-benchmarks because it now also calls the x86-64 implementation of vmalloc_sync_all() on vunmap(). But the vmalloc_sync_all() implementation on x86-64 is only needed for newly created mappings.

To avoid the unnecessary work on x86-64 and to gain the performance back, split up vmalloc_sync_all() into two functions:

* vmalloc_sync_mappings(), and
* vmalloc_sync_unmappings()

Most call-sites to vmalloc_sync_all() only care about new mappings being synchronized. The only exception is the new call-site added in the above mentioned commit.

Fixes 3f8fd02b1bf1 ("mm/vmalloc: Sync unmappings in __purge_vmap_area_lazy()")
---
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c      | 14 ++++++++++++--
 drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c |  2 +-
 include/linux/vmalloc.h  |  5 +++--
 kernel/notifier.c        |  2 +-
 mm/nommu.c               | 10 +++++++---
 mm/vmalloc.c             | 11 +++++++----
 6 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
arch/x86/mm/fault.c +12 -2
index 9ceacd1156db..889c87ecc751 100644
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static inline pmd_t *vmalloc_sync_one(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long address)
 	return pmd_k;
 }
 
-void vmalloc_sync_all(void)
+static void vmalloc_sync(void)
 {
 	unsigned long address;
 
@@ -216,6 +216,16 @@ void vmalloc_sync_all(void)
 	}
 }
 
+void vmalloc_sync_mappings(void)
+{
+	vmalloc_sync();
+}
+
+void vmalloc_sync_unmappings(void)
+{
+	vmalloc_sync();
+}
+
 /*
  * 32-bit:
  *
@@ -318,7 +328,7 @@ static void dump_pagetable(unsigned long address)
 
 #else /* CONFIG_X86_64: */
 
-void vmalloc_sync_all(void)
+void vmalloc_sync_mappings(void)
 {
 	sync_global_pgds(VMALLOC_START & PGDIR_MASK, VMALLOC_END);
 }
drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c +1 -1
index 777f6f7122b4..e0d82fab1f44 100644
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ int ghes_estatus_pool_init(int num_ghes)
 	 * New allocation must be visible in all pgd before it can be found by
 	 * an NMI allocating from the pool.
 	 */
-	vmalloc_sync_all();
+	vmalloc_sync_mappings();
 
 	rc = gen_pool_add(ghes_estatus_pool, addr, PAGE_ALIGN(len), -1);
 	if (rc)
include/linux/vmalloc.h +3 -2
index 4e7809408073..decac0790fc1 100644
@@ -126,8 +126,9 @@ extern int remap_vmalloc_range_partial(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 
 extern int remap_vmalloc_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, void *addr,
 							unsigned long pgoff);
-void vmalloc_sync_all(void);
- 
+void vmalloc_sync_mappings(void);
+void vmalloc_sync_unmappings(void);
+
 /*
  *	Lowlevel-APIs (not for driver use!)
  */
kernel/notifier.c +1 -1
index d9f5081d578d..157d7c29f720 100644
@@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(notify_die);
 
 int register_die_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
 {
-	vmalloc_sync_all();
+	vmalloc_sync_mappings();
 	return atomic_notifier_chain_register(&die_chain, nb);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(register_die_notifier);
mm/nommu.c +7 -3
index 99b7ec318824..3b67bd20c2af 100644
@@ -359,10 +359,14 @@ void vm_unmap_aliases(void)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vm_unmap_aliases);
 
 /*
- * Implement a stub for vmalloc_sync_all() if the architecture chose not to
- * have one.
+ * Implement a stub for vmalloc_sync_[un]mapping() if the architecture
+ * chose not to have one.
  */
-void __weak vmalloc_sync_all(void)
+void __weak vmalloc_sync_mappings(void)
+{
+}
+
+void __weak vmalloc_sync_unmappings(void)
 {
 }
 
mm/vmalloc.c +7 -4
index a3c70e275f4e..c0be707db434 100644
@@ -1259,7 +1259,7 @@ static bool __purge_vmap_area_lazy(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 	 * First make sure the mappings are removed from all page-tables
 	 * before they are freed.
 	 */
-	vmalloc_sync_all();
+	vmalloc_sync_unmappings();
 
 	/*
 	 * TODO: to calculate a flush range without looping.
@@ -3050,16 +3050,19 @@ int remap_vmalloc_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, void *addr,
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(remap_vmalloc_range);
 
 /*
- * Implement a stub for vmalloc_sync_all() if the architecture chose not to
- * have one.
+ * Implement stubs for vmalloc_sync_[un]mappings () if the architecture chose
+ * not to have one.
  *
  * The purpose of this function is to make sure the vmalloc area
  * mappings are identical in all page-tables in the system.
  */
-void __weak vmalloc_sync_all(void)
+void __weak vmalloc_sync_mappings(void)
 {
 }
 
+void __weak vmalloc_sync_unmappings(void)
+{
+}
 
 static int f(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr, void *data)
 {
Signature · 1 line
2.16.4
#1 lore raw

arch/x86/mm/fault.c static void dump_pagetable(unsigned long address) · line 334

Quoted 9 lines · Joerg Roedel
arch/x86/mm/fault.c +1 -1
@@ -318,7 +328,7 @@ static void dump_pagetable(unsigned long address)
 
 #else /* CONFIG_X86_64: */
 
-void vmalloc_sync_all(void)
+void vmalloc_sync_mappings(void)
 {
 	sync_global_pgds(VMALLOC_START & PGDIR_MASK, VMALLOC_END);
 }

FWIW, I generally detest the use of __weak. :)

In this case, it ends up letting us gloss over the fact that we have a 32/64-bit asymmetry. It would probably be nice to actually have a 64-bit implementation that comes along with a nice comment. Maybe this in vmalloc_sync_mappings():

	/*
	 * 64-bit mappings might allocate new p4d/pud pages
	 * that need to be propagated to all tasks' PGDs.
	 */

which would pair nicely with:

void vmalloc_sync_unmappings(void)

{
	/*
	 * Unmappings never allocate or free p4d/pud pages.
	 * No work is required here.
	 */
}
#2 lore raw

Hi Dave,

thanks for your review!

Quoted 5 lines · Dave Hansen
Quoted 4 lines · Joerg Roedel
arch/x86/mm/fault.c +0 -0
@@ -318,7 +328,7 @@ static void dump_pagetable(unsigned long address)
 
 #else /* CONFIG_X86_64: */
 
Quoted 7 lines

arch/x86/mm/fault.c static void dump_pagetable(unsigned long address) · line 334

Quoted 5 lines
arch/x86/mm/fault.c +1 -1
-void vmalloc_sync_all(void)
+void vmalloc_sync_mappings(void)
 {
 	sync_global_pgds(VMALLOC_START & PGDIR_MASK, VMALLOC_END);
 }

FWIW, I generally detest the use of __weak. :)

Yeah, I don't like it either, but in this case it is probably better than empty stubs in all architectures besides x86 :)

Quoted 12 lines

In this case, it ends up letting us gloss over the fact that we have a 32/64-bit asymmetry. It would probably be nice to actually have a 64-bit implementation that comes along with a nice comment. Maybe this in vmalloc_sync_mappings():

	/*
	 * 64-bit mappings might allocate new p4d/pud pages
	 * that need to be propagated to all tasks' PGDs.
	 */

which would pair nicely with:

Quoted 7 lines

void vmalloc_sync_unmappings(void)

{
	/*
	 * Unmappings never allocate or free p4d/pud pages.
	 * No work is required here.
	 */
}

Yes, that makes, I will add these comments in V2.

Thanks,

Joerg