ext4: port direct I/O to iomap infrastructure
Subsystems (5)
v5 cover ext4: port direct I/O to iomap infrastructure
Hello!
I managed to get some time over the weekend to fix up the stuff that came out from the last review. Please feel free to review and provide any necessary constructive criticism.
This patch series ports the ext4 direct I/O paths over to the iomap infrastructure. The legacy buffer_head based direct I/O implementation has subsequently been removed as it's no longer in use. The result of this change is that ext4 now uses the newer iomap framework for direct I/O read/write operations. Overall, this results in a much cleaner direct I/O implementation and keeps this code isolated from the buffer_head internals. In addition to this, a slight performance boost may be expected while using O_SYNC | O_DIRECT.
The changes within this patch series have been tested via xfstests in both DAX and non-DAX modes using the various filesystem configuration options i.e. 4k, dioread_nolock, etc.
Changes since v4:
- Removed the ext4_handle_inode_extension() function out from the ->end_io() callback so that we can realiably truncate any allocated blocks as we have all the information we need in ext4_dio_write_iter().
- Fixed a couple comment formatting issues in addition to spelling mistakes here and there.
- Incorporated the fix for the issue that Dave Chinner found around writes extending beyond and not marking the iomap dirty.
Thank you all who took the time to review and provide feedback. :)
Jan Kara (2):
iomap: Allow forcing of waiting for running DIO in iomap_dio_rw()
xfs: Use iomap_dio_rw_wait()
Matthew Bobrowski (10):
ext4: move set iomap routines into separate helper ext4_set_iomap()
ext4: iomap that extends beyond EOF should be marked dirty
ext4: split IOMAP_WRITE branch in ext4_iomap_begin() into helper
ext4: introduce new callback for IOMAP_REPORT
ext4: introduce direct I/O read using iomap infrastructure
ext4: update direct I/O read to do trylock in IOCB_NOWAIT cases
ext4: move inode extension/truncate code out from ->iomap_end()
callback
ext4: move inode extension check out from ext4_iomap_alloc()
ext4: reorder map->m_flags checks in ext4_set_iomap()
ext4: introduce direct I/O write using iomap infrastructure
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 4 +- fs/ext4/extents.c | 4 +- fs/ext4/file.c | 378 +++++++++++++++++----- fs/ext4/inode.c | 716 +++++++++++------------------------------- fs/gfs2/file.c | 6 +- fs/iomap/direct-io.c | 7 +- fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 13 +- include/linux/iomap.h | 3 +- 8 files changed, 498 insertions(+), 633 deletions(-)
Signature · 3 lines
2.20.1 --<M>--
PATCH v5 1/12 ext4: move set iomap routines into separate helper ext4_set_iomap()
Separate the iomap field population chunk of code that is currently within ext4_iomap_begin() into a new helper called ext4_set_iomap(). The intent of this function is self explanatory, however the rationale behind doing so is to also reduce the overall clutter that we currently have within the ext4_iomap_begin() callback.
--- fs/ext4/inode.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
fs/ext4/inode.c +33 -26
@@ -3406,10 +3406,39 @@ static bool ext4_inode_datasync_dirty(struct inode *inode)return inode->i_state &I_DIRTY_DATASYNC ; } +static void ext4_set_iomap (struct inode *inode,struct iomap *iomap, +struct ext4_map_blocks *map,loff_t offset, +loff_t length) +{ +u8 blkbits = inode->i_blkbits; + + iomap->flags =0 ; +if (ext4_inode_datasync_dirty (inode)) + iomap->flags |=IOMAP_F_DIRTY ; + +if (map->m_flags &EXT4_MAP_NEW ) + iomap->flags |=IOMAP_F_NEW ; + + iomap->bdev = inode->i_sb->s_bdev; + iomap->dax_dev =EXT4_SB (inode->i_sb)->s_daxdev; + iomap->offset = (u64 ) map->m_lblk << blkbits; + iomap->length = (u64 ) map->m_len << blkbits; + +if (map->m_flags & (EXT4_MAP_MAPPED |EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN )) { +if (map->m_flags &EXT4_MAP_MAPPED ) + iomap->type =IOMAP_MAPPED ; +else if (map->m_flags &EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN ) + iomap->type =IOMAP_UNWRITTEN ; + iomap->addr = (u64 ) map->m_pblk << blkbits; + }else { + iomap->type =IOMAP_HOLE ; + iomap->addr =IOMAP_NULL_ADDR ; + } +} +static int ext4_iomap_begin (struct inode *inode,loff_t offset,loff_t length,unsigned flags,struct iomap *iomap) { -struct ext4_sb_info *sbi =EXT4_SB (inode->i_sb);unsigned int blkbits = inode->i_blkbits;unsigned long first_block, last_block;struct ext4_map_blocks map;
@@ -3523,31 +3552,9 @@ static int ext4_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length,return ret; } - iomap->flags =0 ; -if (ext4_inode_datasync_dirty (inode)) - iomap->flags |=IOMAP_F_DIRTY ; - iomap->bdev = inode->i_sb->s_bdev; - iomap->dax_dev = sbi->s_daxdev; - iomap->offset = (u64 )first_block << blkbits; - iomap->length = (u64 )map.m_len << blkbits; - -if (ret ==0 ) { - iomap->type = delalloc ?IOMAP_DELALLOC :IOMAP_HOLE ; - iomap->addr =IOMAP_NULL_ADDR ; - }else { -if (map.m_flags &EXT4_MAP_MAPPED ) { - iomap->type =IOMAP_MAPPED ; - }else if (map.m_flags &EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN ) { - iomap->type =IOMAP_UNWRITTEN ; - }else { -WARN_ON_ONCE (1 ); -return -EIO ; - } - iomap->addr = (u64 )map.m_pblk << blkbits; - } - -if (map.m_flags &EXT4_MAP_NEW ) - iomap->flags |=IOMAP_F_NEW ; +ext4_set_iomap (inode, iomap, &map, offset, length); +if (delalloc && iomap->type ==IOMAP_HOLE ) + iomap->type =IOMAP_DELALLOC ;return 0 ; }
Signature · 3 lines
2.20.1 --<M>--
Re: [PATCH v5 01/12] ext4: move set iomap routines into separate helper ext4_set_iomap()
Quoted 10 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
Separate the iomap field population chunk of code that is currently within
ext4_iomap_begin()into a new helper calledext4_set_iomap(). The intent of this function is self explanatory, however the rationale behind doing so is to also reduce the overall clutter that we currently have within theext4_iomap_begin()callback.Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>--- fs/ext4/inode.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
The patch looks good to me. Feel free to add:
Honza
Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR
Re: [PATCH v5 01/12] ext4: move set iomap routines into separate helper ext4_set_iomap()
In reply to Matthew BobrowskiQuoted 7 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
Separate the iomap field population chunk of code that is currently within
ext4_iomap_begin()into a new helper calledext4_set_iomap(). The intent of this function is self explanatory, however the rationale behind doing so is to also reduce the overall clutter that we currently have within theext4_iomap_begin()callback.Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>
Could you please re-arrange patch sequence in this fashion.
1. Patch-11 (re-ordering of unwritten flags)
2. Patch-8 (trylock in IOCB_NOWAIT cases)
3. Patch-2 (should explain offset & len in this patch)
4. Patch-1 (this patch).
This is so that some of these are anyway fixes or refactoring which can be picked up easily, either for backporting or sometimes this helps in getting some of the patches in, if the patch series gets bigger.
Also others (like me) can also pick some of these changes then to meet their dependency. :)
This patch looks good to me. You may add:
Quoted 85 lines
--- fs/ext4/inode.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)fs/ext4/inode.c +33
-26@@ -3406,10 +3406,39 @@ static bool ext4_inode_datasync_dirty(struct inode *inode)return inode->i_state &I_DIRTY_DATASYNC ; } +static void ext4_set_iomap (struct inode *inode,struct iomap *iomap, +struct ext4_map_blocks *map,loff_t offset, +loff_t length) +{ +u8 blkbits = inode->i_blkbits; + + iomap->flags =0 ; +if (ext4_inode_datasync_dirty (inode)) + iomap->flags |=IOMAP_F_DIRTY ; + +if (map->m_flags &EXT4_MAP_NEW ) + iomap->flags |=IOMAP_F_NEW ; + + iomap->bdev = inode->i_sb->s_bdev; + iomap->dax_dev =EXT4_SB (inode->i_sb)->s_daxdev; + iomap->offset = (u64 ) map->m_lblk << blkbits; + iomap->length = (u64 ) map->m_len << blkbits; + +if (map->m_flags & (EXT4_MAP_MAPPED |EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN )) { +if (map->m_flags &EXT4_MAP_MAPPED ) + iomap->type =IOMAP_MAPPED ; +else if (map->m_flags &EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN ) + iomap->type =IOMAP_UNWRITTEN ; + iomap->addr = (u64 ) map->m_pblk << blkbits; + }else { + iomap->type =IOMAP_HOLE ; + iomap->addr =IOMAP_NULL_ADDR ; + } +} +static int ext4_iomap_begin (struct inode *inode,loff_t offset,loff_t length,unsigned flags,struct iomap *iomap) { -struct ext4_sb_info *sbi =EXT4_SB (inode->i_sb);unsigned int blkbits = inode->i_blkbits;unsigned long first_block, last_block;struct ext4_map_blocks map;@@ -3523,31 +3552,9 @@ static int ext4_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length,return ret; } - iomap->flags =0 ; -if (ext4_inode_datasync_dirty (inode)) - iomap->flags |=IOMAP_F_DIRTY ; - iomap->bdev = inode->i_sb->s_bdev; - iomap->dax_dev = sbi->s_daxdev; - iomap->offset = (u64 )first_block << blkbits; - iomap->length = (u64 )map.m_len << blkbits; - -if (ret ==0 ) { - iomap->type = delalloc ?IOMAP_DELALLOC :IOMAP_HOLE ; - iomap->addr =IOMAP_NULL_ADDR ; - }else { -if (map.m_flags &EXT4_MAP_MAPPED ) { - iomap->type =IOMAP_MAPPED ; - }else if (map.m_flags &EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN ) { - iomap->type =IOMAP_UNWRITTEN ; - }else { -WARN_ON_ONCE (1 ); -return -EIO ; - } - iomap->addr = (u64 )map.m_pblk << blkbits; - } - -if (map.m_flags &EXT4_MAP_NEW ) - iomap->flags |=IOMAP_F_NEW ; +ext4_set_iomap (inode, iomap, &map, offset, length); +if (delalloc && iomap->type ==IOMAP_HOLE ) + iomap->type =IOMAP_DELALLOC ;return 0 ; }
Re: [PATCH v5 01/12] ext4: move set iomap routines into separate helper ext4_set_iomap()
Quoted 9 lines · Ritesh Harjani
Quoted 6 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
Separate the iomap field population chunk of code that is currently within
ext4_iomap_begin()into a new helper calledext4_set_iomap(). The intent of this function is self explanatory, however the rationale behind doing so is to also reduce the overall clutter that we currently have within theext4_iomap_begin()callback.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>Could you please re-arrange patch sequence in this fashion.
1. Patch-11 (re-ordering of unwritten flags)
2. Patch-8 (trylock inIOCB_NOWAITcases)
3. Patch-2 (should explain offset & len in this patch)
4. Patch-1 (this patch).
No objections to this. Just needing to do a little shuffle here and there.
Quoted 6 lines
This is so that some of these are anyway fixes or refactoring which can be picked up easily, either for backporting or sometimes this helps in getting some of the patches in, if the patch series gets bigger.
Also others (like me) can also pick some of these changes then to meet their dependency. :)
Sure, thanks for educating me and making me aware of this.
Quoted 3 lines
This patch looks good to me. You may add:
Reviewed-by Ritesh Harjani <[email protected]>
Thanks Ritesh!
--<M>--
PATCH v5 2/12 ext4: iomap that extends beyond EOF should be marked dirty
In reply to Matthew BobrowskiThis patch is effectively addressed what Dave Chinner had found and fixed within this commit: 8a23414ee345. Justification for needing this modification has been provided below:
When doing a direct IO that spans the current EOF, and there are written blocks beyond EOF that extend beyond the current write, the only metadata update that needs to be done is a file size extension.
However, we don't mark such iomaps as IOMAP_F_DIRTY to indicate that there is IO completion metadata updates required, and hence we may fail to correctly sync file size extensions made in IO completion when O_DSYNC writes are being used and the hardware supports FUA.
Hence when setting IOMAP_F_DIRTY, we need to also take into account whether the iomap spans the current EOF. If it does, then we need to mark it dirty so that IO completion will call generic_write_sync() to flush the inode size update to stable storage correctly.
--- fs/ext4/inode.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
fs/ext4/inode.c +7 -1
@@ -3412,8 +3412,14 @@ static void ext4_set_iomap(struct inode *inode, struct iomap *iomap, {u8 blkbits = inode->i_blkbits; +/* +* Writes that span EOF might trigger an I/O size update on completion, +* so consider them to be dirty for the purposes of O_DSYNC, even if +* there is no other metadata changes being made or are pending here. +*/ iomap->flags =0 ; -if (ext4_inode_datasync_dirty (inode)) +if (ext4_inode_datasync_dirty (inode) || + offset + length >i_size_read (inode)) iomap->flags |=IOMAP_F_DIRTY ;if (map->m_flags &EXT4_MAP_NEW )
Signature · 3 lines
2.20.1 --<M>--
Re: [PATCH v5 02/12] ext4: iomap that extends beyond EOF should be marked dirty
Quoted 13 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
This patch is effectively addressed what Dave Chinner had found and fixed within this commit:
8a23414ee345. Justification for needing this modification has been provided below:When doing a direct IO that spans the current EOF, and there are written blocks beyond EOF that extend beyond the current write, the only metadata update that needs to be done is a file size extension.
However, we don't mark such iomaps as
IOMAP_F_DIRTYto indicate that there is IO completion metadata updates required, and hence we may fail to correctly sync file size extensions made in IO completion whenO_DSYNCwrites are being used and the hardware supports FUA.
Quoted 6 lines
Hence when setting
IOMAP_F_DIRTY, we need to also take into account whether the iomap spans the current EOF. If it does, then we need to mark it dirty so that IO completion will callgeneric_write_sync()to flush the inode size update to stable storage correctly.Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>
Looks good to me. You could possibly also comment in the changelog that currently, this change doesn't have user visible impact for ext4 as none of current users of ext4_iomap_begin() that extend files depend of IOMAP_F_DIRTY.
Also this patch would make slightly more sense to be before 1/12 so that you don't have there those two strange unused arguments. But these are just small nits.
Feel free to add:
Honza
Quoted 28 lines
--- fs/ext4/inode.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)fs/ext4/inode.c +7
-1@@ -3412,8 +3412,14 @@ static void ext4_set_iomap(struct inode *inode, struct iomap *iomap, {u8 blkbits = inode->i_blkbits; +/* +* Writes that span EOF might trigger an I/O size update on completion, +* so consider them to be dirty for the purposes of O_DSYNC, even if +* there is no other metadata changes being made or are pending here. +*/ iomap->flags =0 ; -if (ext4_inode_datasync_dirty (inode)) +if (ext4_inode_datasync_dirty (inode) || + offset + length >i_size_read (inode)) iomap->flags |=IOMAP_F_DIRTY ;if (map->m_flags &EXT4_MAP_NEW )Signature · 3 lines
2.20.1 --<M>--
Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR
Re: [PATCH v5 02/12] ext4: iomap that extends beyond EOF should be marked dirty
Quoted 19 lines · Jan Kara
Quoted 18 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
This patch is effectively addressed what Dave Chinner had found and fixed within this commit:
8a23414ee345. Justification for needing this modification has been provided below:When doing a direct IO that spans the current EOF, and there are written blocks beyond EOF that extend beyond the current write, the only metadata update that needs to be done is a file size extension.
However, we don't mark such iomaps as
IOMAP_F_DIRTYto indicate that there is IO completion metadata updates required, and hence we may fail to correctly sync file size extensions made in IO completion whenO_DSYNCwrites are being used and the hardware supports FUA.Hence when setting
IOMAP_F_DIRTY, we need to also take into account whether the iomap spans the current EOF. If it does, then we need to mark it dirty so that IO completion will callgeneric_write_sync()to flush the inode size update to stable storage correctly.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>Looks good to me. You could possibly also comment in the changelog that currently, this change doesn't have user visible impact for ext4 as none of current users of
ext4_iomap_begin()that extend files depend ofIOMAP_F_DIRTY.
Sure, I will add this.
Quoted 3 lines
Also this patch would make slightly more sense to be before 1/12 so that you don't have there those two strange unused arguments. But these are just small nits.
You're right. I will rearrange it in v6 so that this patch comes first.
Quoted 3 lines
Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Thanks Jan!
--<M>--
Re: [PATCH v5 02/12] ext4: iomap that extends beyond EOF should be marked dirty
In reply to Matthew BobrowskiQuoted 3 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
This patch is effectively addressed what Dave Chinner had found and fixed within this commit:
8a23414ee345. Justification for needing this modification has been provided below:
Not sure if this is a valid commit id. I couldn't find it.
Quoted 10 lines
When doing a direct IO that spans the current EOF, and there are written blocks beyond EOF that extend beyond the current write, the only metadata update that needs to be done is a file size extension.
However, we don't mark such iomaps as
IOMAP_F_DIRTYto indicate that there is IO completion metadata updates required, and hence we may fail to correctly sync file size extensions made in IO completion whenO_DSYNCwrites are being used and the hardware supports FUA.
Quoted 6 lines
Hence when setting
IOMAP_F_DIRTY, we need to also take into account whether the iomap spans the current EOF. If it does, then we need to mark it dirty so that IO completion will callgeneric_write_sync()to flush the inode size update to stable storage correctly.Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>
Otherwise, this patch looks good to me. You may add:
Quoted 25 lines
--- fs/ext4/inode.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)fs/ext4/inode.c +7
-1@@ -3412,8 +3412,14 @@ static void ext4_set_iomap(struct inode *inode, struct iomap *iomap, {u8 blkbits = inode->i_blkbits; +/* +* Writes that span EOF might trigger an I/O size update on completion, +* so consider them to be dirty for the purposes of O_DSYNC, even if +* there is no other metadata changes being made or are pending here. +*/ iomap->flags =0 ; -if (ext4_inode_datasync_dirty (inode)) +if (ext4_inode_datasync_dirty (inode) || + offset + length >i_size_read (inode)) iomap->flags |=IOMAP_F_DIRTY ;if (map->m_flags &EXT4_MAP_NEW )
Re: [PATCH v5 02/12] ext4: iomap that extends beyond EOF should be marked dirty
Quoted 5 lines · Ritesh Harjani
Quoted 3 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
This patch is effectively addressed what Dave Chinner had found and fixed within this commit:
8a23414ee345. Justification for needing this modification has been provided below:Not sure if this is a valid commit id. I couldn't find it.
Ah, oops! I plucked that from somewhere, but where (some thread)? Hm, anyway, this is what I was referring to:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux.git/commit/?h=xfs-5.5-merge&id=7684e2c4384d5d1f884b01ab8bff2369e4db0bff
This is queued for 5.5, so I will add this commit hash to my changelog in v6.
--<M>--
PATCH v5 3/12 ext4: split IOMAP_WRITE branch in ext4_iomap_begin() into helper
In reply to Matthew BobrowskiIn preparation for porting across the ext4 direct I/O path for reads and writes over to the iomap infrastructure, split up the IOMAP_WRITE chunk of code into a separate helper ext4_alloc_iomap(). This way, when we add the necessary bits for direct I/O, we don't end up with ext4_iomap_begin() becoming a behemoth twisty maze.
--- fs/ext4/inode.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
fs/ext4/inode.c +60 -52
@@ -3442,6 +3442,62 @@ static void ext4_set_iomap(struct inode *inode, struct iomap *iomap, } } +static int ext4_iomap_alloc (struct inode *inode,struct ext4_map_blocks *map, +unsigned int flags) +{ +handle_t *handle; +u8 blkbits = inode->i_blkbits; +int ret, dio_credits, retries =0 ; + +/* +* Trim the mapping request to the maximum value that we can map at +* once for direct I/O. +*/ +if (map->m_len >DIO_MAX_BLOCKS ) + map->m_len =DIO_MAX_BLOCKS ; + dio_credits =ext4_chunk_trans_blocks (inode, map->m_len); + +retry: +/* +* Either we allocate blocks and then don't get an unwritten extent, so +* in that case we have reserved enough credits. Or, the blocks are +* already allocated and and unwritten. In that case, the extent +* conversion fits into the credits too. +*/ + handle =ext4_journal_start (inode,EXT4_HT_MAP_BLOCKS , dio_credits); +if (IS_ERR (handle)) +return PTR_ERR (handle); + + ret =ext4_map_blocks (handle, inode, map,EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE_ZERO ); +if (ret <0 ) + goto journal_stop; + +/* +* If we have allocated blocks beyond EOF, we need to ensure that +* they're truncated if we crash before updating the inode size +* metadata within ext4_iomap_end(). For faults, we don't need to do +* that (and cannot due to the orphan list operations needing an +* inode_lock()). If we happen to instantiate blocks beyond EOF, it is +* because we race with a truncate operation, which already has added +* the inode onto the orphan list. +*/ +if (!(flags &IOMAP_FAULT ) && map->m_lblk + map->m_len > + (i_size_read (inode) + (1 << blkbits) -1 ) >> blkbits) { +int err; + + err =ext4_orphan_add (handle, inode); +if (err <0 ) + ret = err; + } + +journal_stop: +ext4_journal_stop (handle); +if (ret == -ENOSPC &&ext4_should_retry_alloc (inode->i_sb, &retries)) + goto retry; + +return ret; +} +static int ext4_iomap_begin (struct inode *inode,loff_t offset,loff_t length,unsigned flags,struct iomap *iomap) {
@@ -3502,62 +3558,14 @@ static int ext4_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length, } } }else if (flags &IOMAP_WRITE ) { -int dio_credits; -handle_t *handle; -int retries =0 ; - -/* Trim mapping request to maximum we can map at once for DIO */ -if (map.m_len >DIO_MAX_BLOCKS ) - map.m_len =DIO_MAX_BLOCKS ; - dio_credits =ext4_chunk_trans_blocks (inode, map.m_len); -retry: -/* -* Either we allocate blocks and then we don't get unwritten -* extent so we have reserved enough credits, or the blocks -* are already allocated and unwritten and in that case -* extent conversion fits in the credits as well. -*/ - handle =ext4_journal_start (inode,EXT4_HT_MAP_BLOCKS , - dio_credits); -if (IS_ERR (handle)) -return PTR_ERR (handle); - - ret =ext4_map_blocks (handle, inode, &map, -EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE_ZERO ); -if (ret <0 ) { -ext4_journal_stop (handle); -if (ret == -ENOSPC && -ext4_should_retry_alloc (inode->i_sb, &retries)) - goto retry; -return ret; - } - -/* -* If we added blocks beyond i_size, we need to make sure they -* will get truncated if we crash before updating i_size in -* ext4_iomap_end(). For faults we don't need to do that (and -* even cannot because for orphan list operations inode_lock is -* required) - if we happen to instantiate block beyond i_size, -* it is because we race with truncate which has already added -* the inode to the orphan list. -*/ -if (!(flags &IOMAP_FAULT ) && first_block + map.m_len > - (i_size_read (inode) + (1 << blkbits) -1 ) >> blkbits) { -int err; - - err =ext4_orphan_add (handle, inode); -if (err <0 ) { -ext4_journal_stop (handle); -return err; - } - } -ext4_journal_stop (handle); + ret =ext4_iomap_alloc (inode, &map, flags); }else { ret =ext4_map_blocks (NULL , inode, &map,0 ); -if (ret <0 ) -return ret; } +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; +ext4_set_iomap (inode, iomap, &map, offset, length);if (delalloc && iomap->type ==IOMAP_HOLE ) iomap->type =IOMAP_DELALLOC ;
Signature · 3 lines
2.20.1 --<M>--
Re: [PATCH v5 03/12] ext4: split IOMAP_WRITE branch in ext4_iomap_begin() into helper
Quoted 7 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
In preparation for porting across the ext4 direct I/O path for reads and writes over to the iomap infrastructure, split up the
IOMAP_WRITEchunk of code into a separate helperext4_alloc_iomap(). This way, when we add the necessary bits for direct I/O, we don't end up withext4_iomap_begin()becoming a behemoth twisty maze.Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>
Looks good to me. You can add:
Honza
Quoted 142 lines
--- fs/ext4/inode.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)fs/ext4/inode.c +60
-52@@ -3442,6 +3442,62 @@ static void ext4_set_iomap(struct inode *inode, struct iomap *iomap, } } +static int ext4_iomap_alloc (struct inode *inode,struct ext4_map_blocks *map, +unsigned int flags) +{ +handle_t *handle; +u8 blkbits = inode->i_blkbits; +int ret, dio_credits, retries =0 ; + +/* +* Trim the mapping request to the maximum value that we can map at +* once for direct I/O. +*/ +if (map->m_len >DIO_MAX_BLOCKS ) + map->m_len =DIO_MAX_BLOCKS ; + dio_credits =ext4_chunk_trans_blocks (inode, map->m_len); + +retry: +/* +* Either we allocate blocks and then don't get an unwritten extent, so +* in that case we have reserved enough credits. Or, the blocks are +* already allocated and and unwritten. In that case, the extent +* conversion fits into the credits too. +*/ + handle =ext4_journal_start (inode,EXT4_HT_MAP_BLOCKS , dio_credits); +if (IS_ERR (handle)) +return PTR_ERR (handle); + + ret =ext4_map_blocks (handle, inode, map,EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE_ZERO ); +if (ret <0 ) + goto journal_stop; + +/* +* If we have allocated blocks beyond EOF, we need to ensure that +* they're truncated if we crash before updating the inode size +* metadata within ext4_iomap_end(). For faults, we don't need to do +* that (and cannot due to the orphan list operations needing an +* inode_lock()). If we happen to instantiate blocks beyond EOF, it is +* because we race with a truncate operation, which already has added +* the inode onto the orphan list. +*/ +if (!(flags &IOMAP_FAULT ) && map->m_lblk + map->m_len > + (i_size_read (inode) + (1 << blkbits) -1 ) >> blkbits) { +int err; + + err =ext4_orphan_add (handle, inode); +if (err <0 ) + ret = err; + } + +journal_stop: +ext4_journal_stop (handle); +if (ret == -ENOSPC &&ext4_should_retry_alloc (inode->i_sb, &retries)) + goto retry; + +return ret; +} +static int ext4_iomap_begin (struct inode *inode,loff_t offset,loff_t length,unsigned flags,struct iomap *iomap) {@@ -3502,62 +3558,14 @@ static int ext4_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length, } } }else if (flags &IOMAP_WRITE ) { -int dio_credits; -handle_t *handle; -int retries =0 ; - -/* Trim mapping request to maximum we can map at once for DIO */ -if (map.m_len >DIO_MAX_BLOCKS ) - map.m_len =DIO_MAX_BLOCKS ; - dio_credits =ext4_chunk_trans_blocks (inode, map.m_len); -retry: -/* -* Either we allocate blocks and then we don't get unwritten -* extent so we have reserved enough credits, or the blocks -* are already allocated and unwritten and in that case -* extent conversion fits in the credits as well. -*/ - handle =ext4_journal_start (inode,EXT4_HT_MAP_BLOCKS , - dio_credits); -if (IS_ERR (handle)) -return PTR_ERR (handle); - - ret =ext4_map_blocks (handle, inode, &map, -EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE_ZERO ); -if (ret <0 ) { -ext4_journal_stop (handle); -if (ret == -ENOSPC && -ext4_should_retry_alloc (inode->i_sb, &retries)) - goto retry; -return ret; - } - -/* -* If we added blocks beyond i_size, we need to make sure they -* will get truncated if we crash before updating i_size in -* ext4_iomap_end(). For faults we don't need to do that (and -* even cannot because for orphan list operations inode_lock is -* required) - if we happen to instantiate block beyond i_size, -* it is because we race with truncate which has already added -* the inode to the orphan list. -*/ -if (!(flags &IOMAP_FAULT ) && first_block + map.m_len > - (i_size_read (inode) + (1 << blkbits) -1 ) >> blkbits) { -int err; - - err =ext4_orphan_add (handle, inode); -if (err <0 ) { -ext4_journal_stop (handle); -return err; - } - } -ext4_journal_stop (handle); + ret =ext4_iomap_alloc (inode, &map, flags); }else { ret =ext4_map_blocks (NULL , inode, &map,0 ); -if (ret <0 ) -return ret; } +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; +ext4_set_iomap (inode, iomap, &map, offset, length);if (delalloc && iomap->type ==IOMAP_HOLE ) iomap->type =IOMAP_DELALLOC ;Signature · 3 lines
2.20.1 --<M>--
Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR
Re: [PATCH v5 03/12] ext4: split IOMAP_WRITE branch in ext4_iomap_begin() into helper
In reply to Matthew BobrowskiQuoted 7 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
In preparation for porting across the ext4 direct I/O path for reads and writes over to the iomap infrastructure, split up the
IOMAP_WRITEchunk of code into a separate helperext4_alloc_iomap(). This way, when we add the necessary bits for direct I/O, we don't end up withext4_iomap_begin()becoming a behemoth twisty maze.Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>
Patch looks good to me. You may add:
Quoted 139 lines
--- fs/ext4/inode.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)fs/ext4/inode.c +60
-52@@ -3442,6 +3442,62 @@ static void ext4_set_iomap(struct inode *inode, struct iomap *iomap, } } +static int ext4_iomap_alloc (struct inode *inode,struct ext4_map_blocks *map, +unsigned int flags) +{ +handle_t *handle; +u8 blkbits = inode->i_blkbits; +int ret, dio_credits, retries =0 ; + +/* +* Trim the mapping request to the maximum value that we can map at +* once for direct I/O. +*/ +if (map->m_len >DIO_MAX_BLOCKS ) + map->m_len =DIO_MAX_BLOCKS ; + dio_credits =ext4_chunk_trans_blocks (inode, map->m_len); + +retry: +/* +* Either we allocate blocks and then don't get an unwritten extent, so +* in that case we have reserved enough credits. Or, the blocks are +* already allocated and and unwritten. In that case, the extent +* conversion fits into the credits too. +*/ + handle =ext4_journal_start (inode,EXT4_HT_MAP_BLOCKS , dio_credits); +if (IS_ERR (handle)) +return PTR_ERR (handle); + + ret =ext4_map_blocks (handle, inode, map,EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE_ZERO ); +if (ret <0 ) + goto journal_stop; + +/* +* If we have allocated blocks beyond EOF, we need to ensure that +* they're truncated if we crash before updating the inode size +* metadata within ext4_iomap_end(). For faults, we don't need to do +* that (and cannot due to the orphan list operations needing an +* inode_lock()). If we happen to instantiate blocks beyond EOF, it is +* because we race with a truncate operation, which already has added +* the inode onto the orphan list. +*/ +if (!(flags &IOMAP_FAULT ) && map->m_lblk + map->m_len > + (i_size_read (inode) + (1 << blkbits) -1 ) >> blkbits) { +int err; + + err =ext4_orphan_add (handle, inode); +if (err <0 ) + ret = err; + } + +journal_stop: +ext4_journal_stop (handle); +if (ret == -ENOSPC &&ext4_should_retry_alloc (inode->i_sb, &retries)) + goto retry; + +return ret; +} +static int ext4_iomap_begin (struct inode *inode,loff_t offset,loff_t length,unsigned flags,struct iomap *iomap) {@@ -3502,62 +3558,14 @@ static int ext4_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length, } } }else if (flags &IOMAP_WRITE ) { -int dio_credits; -handle_t *handle; -int retries =0 ; - -/* Trim mapping request to maximum we can map at once for DIO */ -if (map.m_len >DIO_MAX_BLOCKS ) - map.m_len =DIO_MAX_BLOCKS ; - dio_credits =ext4_chunk_trans_blocks (inode, map.m_len); -retry: -/* -* Either we allocate blocks and then we don't get unwritten -* extent so we have reserved enough credits, or the blocks -* are already allocated and unwritten and in that case -* extent conversion fits in the credits as well. -*/ - handle =ext4_journal_start (inode,EXT4_HT_MAP_BLOCKS , - dio_credits); -if (IS_ERR (handle)) -return PTR_ERR (handle); - - ret =ext4_map_blocks (handle, inode, &map, -EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE_ZERO ); -if (ret <0 ) { -ext4_journal_stop (handle); -if (ret == -ENOSPC && -ext4_should_retry_alloc (inode->i_sb, &retries)) - goto retry; -return ret; - } - -/* -* If we added blocks beyond i_size, we need to make sure they -* will get truncated if we crash before updating i_size in -* ext4_iomap_end(). For faults we don't need to do that (and -* even cannot because for orphan list operations inode_lock is -* required) - if we happen to instantiate block beyond i_size, -* it is because we race with truncate which has already added -* the inode to the orphan list. -*/ -if (!(flags &IOMAP_FAULT ) && first_block + map.m_len > - (i_size_read (inode) + (1 << blkbits) -1 ) >> blkbits) { -int err; - - err =ext4_orphan_add (handle, inode); -if (err <0 ) { -ext4_journal_stop (handle); -return err; - } - } -ext4_journal_stop (handle); + ret =ext4_iomap_alloc (inode, &map, flags); }else { ret =ext4_map_blocks (NULL , inode, &map,0 ); -if (ret <0 ) -return ret; } +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; +ext4_set_iomap (inode, iomap, &map, offset, length);if (delalloc && iomap->type ==IOMAP_HOLE ) iomap->type =IOMAP_DELALLOC ;
PATCH v5 4/12 ext4: introduce new callback for IOMAP_REPORT
In reply to Matthew BobrowskiAs part of the ext4_iomap_begin() cleanups that precede this patch, here we also split up the IOMAP_REPORT branch into a completely separate ->iomap_begin() callback named ext4_iomap_begin_report(). Again, the raionale for this change is to reduce the overall clutter that's starting to become apparent as we start to port more functionality over to the iomap infrastructure.
--- fs/ext4/ext4.h | 1 + fs/ext4/file.c | 6 ++- fs/ext4/inode.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 3 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
fs/ext4/ext4.h +1 -0
@@ -3379,6 +3379,7 @@ static inline void ext4_clear_io_unwritten_flag(ext4_io_end_t *io_end) }extern const struct iomap_ops ext4_iomap_ops; +extern const struct iomap_ops ext4_iomap_report_ops;static inline int ext4_buffer_uptodate (struct buffer_head *bh) {
fs/ext4/file.c +4 -2
@@ -494,12 +494,14 @@ loff_t ext4_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence) maxbytes, i_size_read(inode));case SEEK_HOLE :inode_lock_shared (inode); - offset =iomap_seek_hole (inode, offset, &ext4_iomap_ops); + offset =iomap_seek_hole (inode, offset, + &ext4_iomap_report_ops);inode_unlock_shared (inode);break ;case SEEK_DATA :inode_lock_shared (inode); - offset =iomap_seek_data (inode, offset, &ext4_iomap_ops); + offset =iomap_seek_data (inode, offset, + &ext4_iomap_report_ops);inode_unlock_shared (inode);break ; }
fs/ext4/inode.c +83 -54
163 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 3 lines
2.20.1 --<M>--
Re: [PATCH v5 04/12] ext4: introduce new callback for IOMAP_REPORT
Quoted 8 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
As part of the
ext4_iomap_begin()cleanups that precede this patch, here we also split up theIOMAP_REPORTbranch into a completely separate ->iomap_begin() callback namedext4_iomap_begin_report(). Again, the raionale for this change is to reduce the overall clutter that's starting to become apparent as we start to port more functionality over to the iomap infrastructure.Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>
The patch looks good to me. You can add:
One nit below.
fs/ext4/inode.c const struct iomap_ops ext4_iomap_ops = { · line 3608
Quoted 12 lines
fs/ext4/inode.c +12
-0+ext4_es_find_extent_range (inode, &ext4_es_is_delayed, + map->m_lblk, end, &es); + +if (!es.es_len || es.es_lblk > end) +return false; + +if (es.es_lblk > map->m_lblk) { + map->m_len = es.es_lblk - map->m_lblk; +return false; + } + +if (es.es_lblk <= map->m_lblk)
This condition must be always true AFAICT.
fs/ext4/inode.c const struct iomap_ops ext4_iomap_ops = { · line 3615
Quoted 7 lines
fs/ext4/inode.c +7
-0+ offset = map->m_lblk - es.es_lblk; + + map->m_lblk = es.es_lblk + offset; + map->m_len = es.es_len - offset; + +return true; +}
Honza
Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR
Re: [PATCH v5 04/12] ext4: introduce new callback for IOMAP_REPORT
Quoted 16 lines · Jan Kara
On Mon 21-10-19 20:18:09, Matthew Bobrowski wrote:
One nit below.fs/ext4/inode.c const struct iomap_ops ext4_iomap_ops = { · line 3608
Quoted 12 lines
fs/ext4/inode.c +12
-0+ext4_es_find_extent_range (inode, &ext4_es_is_delayed, + map->m_lblk, end, &es); + +if (!es.es_len || es.es_lblk > end) +return false; + +if (es.es_lblk > map->m_lblk) { + map->m_len = es.es_lblk - map->m_lblk; +return false; + } + +if (es.es_lblk <= map->m_lblk)This condition must be always true AFAICT.
That would make sense. I will remove this condition in v6.
Quoted 7 lines
fs/ext4/inode.c const struct iomap_ops ext4_iomap_ops = { · line 3615
Quoted 7 lines
fs/ext4/inode.c +7
-0+ offset = map->m_lblk - es.es_lblk; + + map->m_lblk = es.es_lblk + offset; + map->m_len = es.es_len - offset; + +return true; +}
--<M>--
Re: [PATCH v5 04/12] ext4: introduce new callback for IOMAP_REPORT
Quoted 18 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
Quoted 16 lines · Jan Kara
On Mon 21-10-19 20:18:09, Matthew Bobrowski wrote:
One nit below.fs/ext4/inode.c const struct iomap_ops ext4_iomap_ops = { · line 3608
Quoted 12 lines
fs/ext4/inode.c +12
-0+ext4_es_find_extent_range (inode, &ext4_es_is_delayed, + map->m_lblk, end, &es); + +if (!es.es_len || es.es_lblk > end) +return false; + +if (es.es_lblk > map->m_lblk) { + map->m_len = es.es_lblk - map->m_lblk; +return false; + } + +if (es.es_lblk <= map->m_lblk)This condition must be always true AFAICT.
Quoted 5 lines
That would make sense. I will remove this condition in v6.
Quoted 3 lines
fs/ext4/inode.c const struct iomap_ops ext4_iomap_ops = { · line 3611
Quoted 3 lines
fs/ext4/inode.c +3
-0+ offset = map->m_lblk - es.es_lblk; + + map->m_lblk = es.es_lblk + offset;
And so, this above line will also be redundant.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
fs/ext4/inode.c const struct iomap_ops ext4_iomap_ops = { · line 3615
Quoted 4 lines
fs/ext4/inode.c +4
-0+ map->m_len = es.es_len - offset; + +return true; +}--<M>--
Re: [PATCH v5 04/12] ext4: introduce new callback for IOMAP_REPORT
Quoted 4 lines · Ritesh Harjani
Quoted 3 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
Quoted 2 lines · Jan Kara
On Mon 21-10-19 20:18:09, Matthew Bobrowski wrote:
One nit below.
Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
fs/ext4/inode.c +6
-0+ext4_es_find_extent_range (inode, &ext4_es_is_delayed, + map->m_lblk, end, &es); + +if (!es.es_len || es.es_lblk > end) +return false; +Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
fs/ext4/inode.c const struct iomap_ops ext4_iomap_ops = { · line 3611
Quoted 8 lines
fs/ext4/inode.c +8
-0+if (es.es_lblk > map->m_lblk) { + map->m_len = es.es_lblk - map->m_lblk; +return false; + } + +if (es.es_lblk <= map->m_lblk) + offset = map->m_lblk - es.es_lblk; + map->m_lblk = es.es_lblk + offset;And so, this above line will also be redundant.
And, you're absolutely right. Nice catch. Who knew basic math could go such a long way? :P
Thanks Ritesh!
--<M>--
PATCH v5 5/12 iomap: Allow forcing of waiting for running DIO in iomap_dio_rw()
In reply to Matthew BobrowskiFilesystems do not support doing IO as asynchronous in some cases. For example in case of unaligned writes or in case file size needs to be extended (e.g. for ext4). Instead of forcing filesystem to wait for AIO in such cases, add argument to iomap_dio_rw() which makes the function wait for IO completion. This also results in executing iomap_dio_complete() inline in iomap_dio_rw() providing its return value to the caller as for ordinary sync IO.
---
This patch has already been posted through by Jan, but I've just included it within this patch series to mark that it's a clear dependency.
fs/gfs2/file.c | 6 ++++-- fs/iomap/direct-io.c | 7 +++++-- fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 5 +++-- include/linux/iomap.h | 3 ++- 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
fs/gfs2/file.c +4 -2
@@ -732,7 +732,8 @@ static ssize_t gfs2_file_direct_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)if (ret) goto out_uninit; - ret =iomap_dio_rw (iocb, to, &gfs2_iomap_ops,NULL ); + ret =iomap_dio_rw (iocb, to, &gfs2_iomap_ops,NULL , +is_sync_kiocb (iocb));gfs2_glock_dq (&gh); out_uninit:
@@ -767,7 +768,8 @@ static ssize_t gfs2_file_direct_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)if (offset + len >i_size_read (&ip->i_inode)) goto out; - ret =iomap_dio_rw (iocb, from, &gfs2_iomap_ops,NULL ); + ret =iomap_dio_rw (iocb, from, &gfs2_iomap_ops,NULL , +is_sync_kiocb (iocb)); out:gfs2_glock_dq (&gh);
fs/iomap/direct-io.c +5 -2
@@ -392,7 +392,8 @@ iomap_dio_actor(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t length,*/ ssize_t iomap_dio_rw (struct kiocb *iocb,struct iov_iter *iter, -const struct iomap_ops *ops,const struct iomap_dio_ops *dops) +const struct iomap_ops *ops,const struct iomap_dio_ops *dops, +bool wait_for_completion) {struct address_space *mapping = iocb->ki_filp->f_mapping;struct inode *inode =file_inode (iocb->ki_filp);
@@ -400,7 +401,6 @@ iomap_dio_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,loff_t pos = iocb->ki_pos, start = pos;loff_t end = iocb->ki_pos + count -1 , ret =0 ;unsigned int flags =IOMAP_DIRECT ; -bool wait_for_completion =is_sync_kiocb (iocb);struct blk_plug plug;struct iomap_dio *dio;
@@ -409,6 +409,9 @@ iomap_dio_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,if (!count)return 0 ; +if (WARN_ON (is_sync_kiocb (iocb) && !wait_for_completion)) +return -EIO ; + dio =kmalloc (sizeof (*dio),GFP_KERNEL );if (!dio)return -ENOMEM ;
fs/xfs/xfs_file.c +3 -2
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ xfs_file_dio_aio_read(file_accessed (iocb->ki_filp);xfs_ilock (ip,XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED ); - ret =iomap_dio_rw (iocb, to, &xfs_iomap_ops,NULL ); + ret =iomap_dio_rw (iocb, to, &xfs_iomap_ops,NULL ,is_sync_kiocb (iocb));xfs_iunlock (ip,XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED );return ret;
@@ -547,7 +547,8 @@ xfs_file_dio_aio_write( }trace_xfs_file_direct_write (ip, count, iocb->ki_pos); - ret =iomap_dio_rw (iocb, from, &xfs_iomap_ops, &xfs_dio_write_ops); + ret =iomap_dio_rw (iocb, from, &xfs_iomap_ops, &xfs_dio_write_ops, +is_sync_kiocb (iocb));/* * If unaligned, this is the only IO in-flight. If it has not yet
include/linux/iomap.h +2 -1
@@ -195,7 +195,8 @@ struct iomap_dio_ops { };ssize_t iomap_dio_rw (struct kiocb *iocb,struct iov_iter *iter, -const struct iomap_ops *ops,const struct iomap_dio_ops *dops); +const struct iomap_ops *ops,const struct iomap_dio_ops *dops, +bool wait_for_completion);int iomap_dio_iopoll (struct kiocb *kiocb,bool spin);#ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
Signature · 3 lines
2.20.1 --<M>--
Re: [PATCH v5 05/12] iomap: Allow forcing of waiting for running DIO in iomap_dio_rw()
Quoted 3 lines · On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 08:18:18PM +1100, [email protected] wrote:
This patch has already been posted through by Jan, but I've just included it within this patch series to mark that it's a clear dependency.
You probably want to resend the next iteration against the iomap-for-next branch, which includes this plus an iomap_begin API change. Darrick plans to have it as a stable branch, so that it can also be pulled into the ext4 tree.
Re: [PATCH v5 05/12] iomap: Allow forcing of waiting for running DIO in iomap_dio_rw()
Quoted 9 lines · Christoph Hellwig
Quoted 3 lines · On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 08:18:18PM +1100, [email protected] wrote:
This patch has already been posted through by Jan, but I've just included it within this patch series to mark that it's a clear dependency.
You probably want to resend the next iteration against the iomap-for-next branch, which includes this plus an
iomap_beginAPI change. Darrick plans to have it as a stable branch, so that it can also be pulled into the ext4 tree.
OK, noted! Checking out and rebasing. :)
--<M>--
PATCH v5 6/12 xfs: Use iomap_dio_rw_wait()
In reply to Matthew BobrowskiUse iomap_dio_rw() to wait for unaligned direct IO instead of opencoding the wait.
---
This patch has already been posted through by Jan, but I've just included it within this patch series to mark that it's a clear dependency.
fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 12 ++++-------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
fs/xfs/xfs_file.c +4 -8
@@ -547,16 +547,12 @@ xfs_file_dio_aio_write( }trace_xfs_file_direct_write (ip, count, iocb->ki_pos); - ret =iomap_dio_rw (iocb, from, &xfs_iomap_ops, &xfs_dio_write_ops, -is_sync_kiocb (iocb)); -/* -* If unaligned, this is the only IO in-flight. If it has not yet -* completed, wait on it before we release the iolock to prevent -* subsequent overlapping IO. +* If unaligned, this is the only IO in-flight. Wait on it before we +* release the iolock to prevent subsequent overlapping IO. */ -if (ret == -EIOCBQUEUED && unaligned_io) -inode_dio_wait (inode); + ret =iomap_dio_rw (iocb, from, &xfs_iomap_ops, &xfs_dio_write_ops, +is_sync_kiocb (iocb) || unaligned_io); out:xfs_iunlock (ip, iolock);
Signature · 3 lines
2.20.1 --<M>--
Jan Kara
reviewerRe: [PATCH v5 06/12] xfs: Use iomap_dio_rw_wait()
Quoted 9 lines · On Mon 21-10-19 20:18:27, [email protected] wrote:
Use
iomap_dio_rw()to wait for unaligned direct IO instead of opencoding the wait.Signed-off-by Jan Kara <[email protected]>---
This patch has already been posted through by Jan, but I've just included it within this patch series to mark that it's a clear dependency.
This patch actually is not a dependency. But that doesn't really matter...
Honza
Quoted 33 lines
fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 12 ++++-------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)fs/xfs/xfs_file.c +4
-8@@ -547,16 +547,12 @@ xfs_file_dio_aio_write( }trace_xfs_file_direct_write (ip, count, iocb->ki_pos); - ret =iomap_dio_rw (iocb, from, &xfs_iomap_ops, &xfs_dio_write_ops, -is_sync_kiocb (iocb)); -/* -* If unaligned, this is the only IO in-flight. If it has not yet -* completed, wait on it before we release the iolock to prevent -* subsequent overlapping IO. +* If unaligned, this is the only IO in-flight. Wait on it before we +* release the iolock to prevent subsequent overlapping IO. */ -if (ret == -EIOCBQUEUED && unaligned_io) -inode_dio_wait (inode); + ret =iomap_dio_rw (iocb, from, &xfs_iomap_ops, &xfs_dio_write_ops, +is_sync_kiocb (iocb) || unaligned_io); out:xfs_iunlock (ip, iolock);Signature · 3 lines
2.20.1 --<M>--
Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR
PATCH v5 7/12 ext4: introduce direct I/O read using iomap infrastructure
In reply to Matthew BobrowskiThis patch introduces a new direct I/O read path which makes use of the iomap infrastructure.
The new function ext4_do_read_iter() is responsible for calling into the iomap infrastructure via iomap_dio_rw(). If the read operation performed on the inode is not supported, which is checked via ext4_dio_supported(), then we simply fallback and complete the I/O using buffered I/O.
Existing direct I/O read code path has been removed, as it is no longer required.
--- fs/ext4/file.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- fs/ext4/inode.c | 32 +------------------------------- 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
fs/ext4/file.c +45 -1
@@ -34,6 +34,46 @@#include "xattr.h" #include "acl.h" +static bool ext4_dio_supported (struct inode *inode) +{ +if (IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION ) &&IS_ENCRYPTED (inode)) +return false; +if (fsverity_active (inode)) +return false; +if (ext4_should_journal_data (inode)) +return false; +if (ext4_has_inline_data (inode)) +return false; +return true; +} + +static int ext4_dio_read_iter (struct kiocb *iocb,struct iov_iter *to) +{ +ssize_t ret; +struct inode *inode =file_inode (iocb->ki_filp); + +inode_lock_shared (inode); +if (!ext4_dio_supported (inode)) { +inode_unlock_shared (inode); +/* +* Fallback to buffered I/O if the operation being performed on +* the inode is not supported by direct I/O. The IOCB_DIRECT +* flag needs to be cleared here in order to ensure that the +* direct I/O path within generic_file_read_iter() is not +* taken. +*/ + iocb->ki_flags &= ~IOCB_DIRECT ; +return generic_file_read_iter (iocb, to); + } + + ret =iomap_dio_rw (iocb, to, &ext4_iomap_ops,NULL , +is_sync_kiocb (iocb)); +inode_unlock_shared (inode); + +file_accessed (iocb->ki_filp); +return ret; +} +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_DAX static ssize_t ext4_dax_read_iter (struct kiocb *iocb,struct iov_iter *to) {
@@ -64,7 +104,9 @@ static ssize_t ext4_dax_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)static ssize_t ext4_file_read_iter (struct kiocb *iocb,struct iov_iter *to) { -if (unlikely (ext4_forced_shutdown (EXT4_SB (file_inode (iocb->ki_filp)->i_sb)))) +struct inode *inode =file_inode (iocb->ki_filp); + +if (unlikely (ext4_forced_shutdown (EXT4_SB (inode->i_sb))))return -EIO ;if (!iov_iter_count (to))
@@ -74,6 +116,8 @@ static ssize_t ext4_file_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)if (IS_DAX (file_inode (iocb->ki_filp)))return ext4_dax_read_iter (iocb, to);#endif +if (iocb->ki_flags &IOCB_DIRECT ) +return ext4_dio_read_iter (iocb, to);return generic_file_read_iter (iocb, to); }
fs/ext4/inode.c +1 -31
@@ -863,9 +863,6 @@ int ext4_dio_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock, {/* We don't expect handle for direct IO */ WARN_ON_ONCE (ext4_journal_current_handle ()); - -if (!create) -return _ext4_get_block (inode, iblock, bh,0 );return ext4_get_block_trans (inode, iblock, bh,EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE ); }
@@ -3865,30 +3862,6 @@ static ssize_t ext4_direct_IO_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)return ret; } -static ssize_t ext4_direct_IO_read (struct kiocb *iocb,struct iov_iter *iter) -{ -struct address_space *mapping = iocb->ki_filp->f_mapping; -struct inode *inode = mapping->host; -size_t count =iov_iter_count (iter); -ssize_t ret; - -/* -* Shared inode_lock is enough for us - it protects against concurrent -* writes & truncates and since we take care of writing back page cache, -* we are protected against page writeback as well. -*/ -inode_lock_shared (inode); - ret =filemap_write_and_wait_range (mapping, iocb->ki_pos, - iocb->ki_pos + count -1 ); -if (ret) - goto out_unlock; - ret =__blockdev_direct_IO (iocb, inode, inode->i_sb->s_bdev, - iter, ext4_dio_get_block,NULL ,NULL ,0 ); -out_unlock: -inode_unlock_shared (inode); -return ret; -} -static ssize_t ext4_direct_IO (struct kiocb *iocb,struct iov_iter *iter) {struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
@@ -3915,10 +3888,7 @@ static ssize_t ext4_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)return 0 ;trace_ext4_direct_IO_enter (inode, offset, count,iov_iter_rw (iter)); -if (iov_iter_rw (iter) ==READ ) - ret =ext4_direct_IO_read (iocb, iter); -else - ret =ext4_direct_IO_write (iocb, iter); + ret =ext4_direct_IO_write (iocb, iter);trace_ext4_direct_IO_exit (inode, offset, count,iov_iter_rw (iter), ret);return ret; }
Signature · 3 lines
2.20.1 --<M>--
Re: [PATCH v5 07/12] ext4: introduce direct I/O read using iomap infrastructure
Quoted 9 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
This patch introduces a new direct I/O read path which makes use of the iomap infrastructure.
The new function
ext4_do_read_iter()is responsible for calling into the iomap infrastructure viaiomap_dio_rw(). If the read operation performed on the inode is not supported, which is checked viaext4_dio_supported(), then we simply fallback and complete the I/O using buffered I/O.
Quoted 4 lines
Existing direct I/O read code path has been removed, as it is no longer required.
Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>
Looks good to me. You can add:
BTW, I think I gave you my Reviewed-by tag for this patch also last time and this patch didn't change since then. You can just include the tag in your posting in that case.
Honza
Quoted 137 lines
--- fs/ext4/file.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- fs/ext4/inode.c | 32 +------------------------------- 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)fs/ext4/file.c +45
-1@@ -34,6 +34,46 @@#include "xattr.h" #include "acl.h" +static bool ext4_dio_supported (struct inode *inode) +{ +if (IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION ) &&IS_ENCRYPTED (inode)) +return false; +if (fsverity_active (inode)) +return false; +if (ext4_should_journal_data (inode)) +return false; +if (ext4_has_inline_data (inode)) +return false; +return true; +} + +static int ext4_dio_read_iter (struct kiocb *iocb,struct iov_iter *to) +{ +ssize_t ret; +struct inode *inode =file_inode (iocb->ki_filp); + +inode_lock_shared (inode); +if (!ext4_dio_supported (inode)) { +inode_unlock_shared (inode); +/* +* Fallback to buffered I/O if the operation being performed on +* the inode is not supported by direct I/O. The IOCB_DIRECT +* flag needs to be cleared here in order to ensure that the +* direct I/O path within generic_file_read_iter() is not +* taken. +*/ + iocb->ki_flags &= ~IOCB_DIRECT ; +return generic_file_read_iter (iocb, to); + } + + ret =iomap_dio_rw (iocb, to, &ext4_iomap_ops,NULL , +is_sync_kiocb (iocb)); +inode_unlock_shared (inode); + +file_accessed (iocb->ki_filp); +return ret; +} +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_DAX static ssize_t ext4_dax_read_iter (struct kiocb *iocb,struct iov_iter *to) {@@ -64,7 +104,9 @@ static ssize_t ext4_dax_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)static ssize_t ext4_file_read_iter (struct kiocb *iocb,struct iov_iter *to) { -if (unlikely (ext4_forced_shutdown (EXT4_SB (file_inode (iocb->ki_filp)->i_sb)))) +struct inode *inode =file_inode (iocb->ki_filp); + +if (unlikely (ext4_forced_shutdown (EXT4_SB (inode->i_sb))))return -EIO ;if (!iov_iter_count (to))@@ -74,6 +116,8 @@ static ssize_t ext4_file_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)if (IS_DAX (file_inode (iocb->ki_filp)))return ext4_dax_read_iter (iocb, to);#endif +if (iocb->ki_flags &IOCB_DIRECT ) +return ext4_dio_read_iter (iocb, to);return generic_file_read_iter (iocb, to); }fs/ext4/inode.c +1
-31@@ -863,9 +863,6 @@ int ext4_dio_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock, {/* We don't expect handle for direct IO */ WARN_ON_ONCE (ext4_journal_current_handle ()); - -if (!create) -return _ext4_get_block (inode, iblock, bh,0 );return ext4_get_block_trans (inode, iblock, bh,EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE ); }@@ -3865,30 +3862,6 @@ static ssize_t ext4_direct_IO_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)return ret; } -static ssize_t ext4_direct_IO_read (struct kiocb *iocb,struct iov_iter *iter) -{ -struct address_space *mapping = iocb->ki_filp->f_mapping; -struct inode *inode = mapping->host; -size_t count =iov_iter_count (iter); -ssize_t ret; - -/* -* Shared inode_lock is enough for us - it protects against concurrent -* writes & truncates and since we take care of writing back page cache, -* we are protected against page writeback as well. -*/ -inode_lock_shared (inode); - ret =filemap_write_and_wait_range (mapping, iocb->ki_pos, - iocb->ki_pos + count -1 ); -if (ret) - goto out_unlock; - ret =__blockdev_direct_IO (iocb, inode, inode->i_sb->s_bdev, - iter, ext4_dio_get_block,NULL ,NULL ,0 ); -out_unlock: -inode_unlock_shared (inode); -return ret; -} -static ssize_t ext4_direct_IO (struct kiocb *iocb,struct iov_iter *iter) {struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;@@ -3915,10 +3888,7 @@ static ssize_t ext4_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)return 0 ;trace_ext4_direct_IO_enter (inode, offset, count,iov_iter_rw (iter)); -if (iov_iter_rw (iter) ==READ ) - ret =ext4_direct_IO_read (iocb, iter); -else - ret =ext4_direct_IO_write (iocb, iter); + ret =ext4_direct_IO_write (iocb, iter);trace_ext4_direct_IO_exit (inode, offset, count,iov_iter_rw (iter), ret);return ret; }Signature · 3 lines
2.20.1 --<M>--
Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR
Re: [PATCH v5 07/12] ext4: introduce direct I/O read using iomap infrastructure
Quoted 15 lines · Jan Kara
Quoted 9 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
This patch introduces a new direct I/O read path which makes use of the iomap infrastructure.
The new function
ext4_do_read_iter()is responsible for calling into the iomap infrastructure viaiomap_dio_rw(). If the read operation performed on the inode is not supported, which is checked viaext4_dio_supported(), then we simply fallback and complete the I/O using buffered I/O.Quoted 4 lines
Existing direct I/O read code path has been removed, as it is no longer required.
Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>
Quoted 7 lines
Looks good to me. You can add:
Reviewed-by Jan Kara <[email protected]>BTW, I think I gave you my Reviewed-by tag for this patch also last time and this patch didn't change since then. You can just include the tag in your posting in that case.
The lock pattern was dropped here, so I thought I'd just have you review it again to be sure that you didn't object. But anyway, thank you!
--<M>--
Re: [PATCH v5 07/12] ext4: introduce direct I/O read using iomap infrastructure
In reply to Matthew BobrowskiQuoted 9 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
This patch introduces a new direct I/O read path which makes use of the iomap infrastructure.
The new function
ext4_do_read_iter()is responsible for calling into the iomap infrastructure viaiomap_dio_rw(). If the read operation performed on the inode is not supported, which is checked viaext4_dio_supported(), then we simply fallback and complete the I/O using buffered I/O.
Quoted 4 lines
Existing direct I/O read code path has been removed, as it is no longer required.
Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>
Patch looks good to me. You may add:
Quoted 134 lines
--- fs/ext4/file.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- fs/ext4/inode.c | 32 +------------------------------- 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)fs/ext4/file.c +45
-1@@ -34,6 +34,46 @@#include "xattr.h" #include "acl.h" +static bool ext4_dio_supported (struct inode *inode) +{ +if (IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION ) &&IS_ENCRYPTED (inode)) +return false; +if (fsverity_active (inode)) +return false; +if (ext4_should_journal_data (inode)) +return false; +if (ext4_has_inline_data (inode)) +return false; +return true; +} + +static int ext4_dio_read_iter (struct kiocb *iocb,struct iov_iter *to) +{ +ssize_t ret; +struct inode *inode =file_inode (iocb->ki_filp); + +inode_lock_shared (inode); +if (!ext4_dio_supported (inode)) { +inode_unlock_shared (inode); +/* +* Fallback to buffered I/O if the operation being performed on +* the inode is not supported by direct I/O. The IOCB_DIRECT +* flag needs to be cleared here in order to ensure that the +* direct I/O path within generic_file_read_iter() is not +* taken. +*/ + iocb->ki_flags &= ~IOCB_DIRECT ; +return generic_file_read_iter (iocb, to); + } + + ret =iomap_dio_rw (iocb, to, &ext4_iomap_ops,NULL , +is_sync_kiocb (iocb)); +inode_unlock_shared (inode); + +file_accessed (iocb->ki_filp); +return ret; +} +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_DAX static ssize_t ext4_dax_read_iter (struct kiocb *iocb,struct iov_iter *to) {@@ -64,7 +104,9 @@ static ssize_t ext4_dax_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)static ssize_t ext4_file_read_iter (struct kiocb *iocb,struct iov_iter *to) { -if (unlikely (ext4_forced_shutdown (EXT4_SB (file_inode (iocb->ki_filp)->i_sb)))) +struct inode *inode =file_inode (iocb->ki_filp); + +if (unlikely (ext4_forced_shutdown (EXT4_SB (inode->i_sb))))return -EIO ;if (!iov_iter_count (to))@@ -74,6 +116,8 @@ static ssize_t ext4_file_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)if (IS_DAX (file_inode (iocb->ki_filp)))return ext4_dax_read_iter (iocb, to);#endif +if (iocb->ki_flags &IOCB_DIRECT ) +return ext4_dio_read_iter (iocb, to);return generic_file_read_iter (iocb, to); }fs/ext4/inode.c +1
-31@@ -863,9 +863,6 @@ int ext4_dio_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock, {/* We don't expect handle for direct IO */ WARN_ON_ONCE (ext4_journal_current_handle ()); - -if (!create) -return _ext4_get_block (inode, iblock, bh,0 );return ext4_get_block_trans (inode, iblock, bh,EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE ); }@@ -3865,30 +3862,6 @@ static ssize_t ext4_direct_IO_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)return ret; } -static ssize_t ext4_direct_IO_read (struct kiocb *iocb,struct iov_iter *iter) -{ -struct address_space *mapping = iocb->ki_filp->f_mapping; -struct inode *inode = mapping->host; -size_t count =iov_iter_count (iter); -ssize_t ret; - -/* -* Shared inode_lock is enough for us - it protects against concurrent -* writes & truncates and since we take care of writing back page cache, -* we are protected against page writeback as well. -*/ -inode_lock_shared (inode); - ret =filemap_write_and_wait_range (mapping, iocb->ki_pos, - iocb->ki_pos + count -1 ); -if (ret) - goto out_unlock; - ret =__blockdev_direct_IO (iocb, inode, inode->i_sb->s_bdev, - iter, ext4_dio_get_block,NULL ,NULL ,0 ); -out_unlock: -inode_unlock_shared (inode); -return ret; -} -static ssize_t ext4_direct_IO (struct kiocb *iocb,struct iov_iter *iter) {struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;@@ -3915,10 +3888,7 @@ static ssize_t ext4_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)return 0 ;trace_ext4_direct_IO_enter (inode, offset, count,iov_iter_rw (iter)); -if (iov_iter_rw (iter) ==READ ) - ret =ext4_direct_IO_read (iocb, iter); -else - ret =ext4_direct_IO_write (iocb, iter); + ret =ext4_direct_IO_write (iocb, iter);trace_ext4_direct_IO_exit (inode, offset, count,iov_iter_rw (iter), ret);return ret; }
PATCH v5 8/12 ext4: update direct I/O read to do trylock in IOCB_NOWAIT cases
In reply to Matthew BobrowskiThis patch updates the lock pattern in ext4_dio_read_iter() to only perform the trylock in IOCB_NOWAIT cases.
--- fs/ext4/file.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
fs/ext4/file.c +7 -1
@@ -52,7 +52,13 @@ static int ext4_dio_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)ssize_t ret;struct inode *inode =file_inode (iocb->ki_filp); -inode_lock_shared (inode); +if (iocb->ki_flags &IOCB_NOWAIT ) { +if (!inode_trylock_shared (inode)) +return -EAGAIN ; + }else { +inode_lock_shared (inode); + } +if (!ext4_dio_supported (inode)) {inode_unlock_shared (inode);/*
Signature · 3 lines
2.20.1 --<M>--
Jan Kara
reviewerRe: [PATCH v5 08/12] ext4: update direct I/O read to do trylock in IOCB_NOWAIT cases
Quoted 2 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
This patch updates the lock pattern in
ext4_dio_read_iter()to only perform the trylock inIOCB_NOWAITcases.
The changelog is actually misleading. It should say something like "This patch updates the lock pattern in ext4_dio_read_iter() to not block on inode lock in case of IOCB_NOWAIT direct IO reads."
Also to ease backporting of easy fixes, we try to put patches like this early in the series (fixing code in ext4_direct_IO_read(), and then the fixed code would just carry over to ext4_dio_read_iter()).
The change itself looks good to me.
Honza
Quoted 25 lines
Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>--- fs/ext4/file.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)fs/ext4/file.c +7
-1@@ -52,7 +52,13 @@ static int ext4_dio_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)ssize_t ret;struct inode *inode =file_inode (iocb->ki_filp); -inode_lock_shared (inode); +if (iocb->ki_flags &IOCB_NOWAIT ) { +if (!inode_trylock_shared (inode)) +return -EAGAIN ; + }else { +inode_lock_shared (inode); + } +if (!ext4_dio_supported (inode)) {inode_unlock_shared (inode);/*
Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR
Re: [PATCH v5 08/12] ext4: update direct I/O read to do trylock in IOCB_NOWAIT cases
Quoted 11 lines · Jan Kara
Quoted 2 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
This patch updates the lock pattern in
ext4_dio_read_iter()to only perform the trylock inIOCB_NOWAITcases.The changelog is actually misleading. It should say something like "This patch updates the lock pattern in
ext4_dio_read_iter()to not block on inode lock in case ofIOCB_NOWAITdirect IO reads."Also to ease backporting of easy fixes, we try to put patches like this early in the series (fixing code in
ext4_direct_IO_read(), and then the fixed code would just carry over toext4_dio_read_iter()).
OK, understood. Now I know this for next time. :)
Providing that I have this patch precede the ext4_dio_read_iter() patch and implement this lock pattern in ext4_direct_IO_read(), am I OK to add the 'Reviewed-by' tag?
--<M>--
Jan Kara
reviewerRe: [PATCH v5 08/12] ext4: update direct I/O read to do trylock in IOCB_NOWAIT cases
Quoted 13 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
Quoted 11 lines · Jan Kara
Quoted 2 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
This patch updates the lock pattern in
ext4_dio_read_iter()to only perform the trylock inIOCB_NOWAITcases.The changelog is actually misleading. It should say something like "This patch updates the lock pattern in
ext4_dio_read_iter()to not block on inode lock in case ofIOCB_NOWAITdirect IO reads."Also to ease backporting of easy fixes, we try to put patches like this early in the series (fixing code in
ext4_direct_IO_read(), and then the fixed code would just carry over toext4_dio_read_iter()).
Quoted 5 lines
OK, understood. Now I know this for next time. :)
Providing that I have this patch precede the
ext4_dio_read_iter()patch and implement this lock pattern inext4_direct_IO_read(), am I OK to add the 'Reviewed-by' tag?
Yes.
Honza
Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR
Re: [PATCH v5 08/12] ext4: update direct I/O read to do trylock in IOCB_NOWAIT cases
In reply to Matthew BobrowskiQuoted 4 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
This patch updates the lock pattern in
ext4_dio_read_iter()to only perform the trylock inIOCB_NOWAITcases.Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>
This shall need a rebase (as mentioned in patch-1 discussion). It will be good to mention that the locking condition is kept similar to 942491c9e6d6 ("xfs: fix AIM7 regression").
Also, I think it may also need a fixes tag.
It seems unconditional inode_lock_shared was added by below commit.
Otherwise, this patch looks good to me. You may add:
Quoted 24 lines
--- fs/ext4/file.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)fs/ext4/file.c +7
-1@@ -52,7 +52,13 @@ static int ext4_dio_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)ssize_t ret;struct inode *inode =file_inode (iocb->ki_filp); -inode_lock_shared (inode); +if (iocb->ki_flags &IOCB_NOWAIT ) { +if (!inode_trylock_shared (inode)) +return -EAGAIN ; + }else { +inode_lock_shared (inode); + } +if (!ext4_dio_supported (inode)) {inode_unlock_shared (inode);/*
PATCH v5 9/12 ext4: move inode extension/truncate code out from ->iomap_end() callback
In reply to Matthew BobrowskiIn preparation for implementing the iomap direct I/O modifications, the inode extension/truncate code needs to be moved out from the ext4_iomap_end() callback. For direct I/O, if the current code remained, it would behave incorrrectly. Updating the inode size prior to converting unwritten extents would potentially allow a racing direct I/O read to find unwritten extents before being converted correctly.
The inode extension/truncate code now resides within a new helper ext4_handle_inode_extension(). This function has been designed so that it can accommodate for both DAX and direct I/O extension/truncate operations.
--- fs/ext4/file.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- fs/ext4/inode.c | 48 +-------------------------------- 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
fs/ext4/file.c +70 -1
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@#include "ext4_jbd2.h" #include "xattr.h" #include "acl.h" +#include "truncate.h" static bool ext4_dio_supported (struct inode *inode) {
@@ -233,12 +234,77 @@ static ssize_t ext4_write_checks(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)return iov_iter_count (from); } +static ssize_t ext4_handle_inode_extension (struct inode *inode,ssize_t written, +loff_t offset,size_t count) +{ +handle_t *handle; +bool truncate = false; +u8 blkbits = inode->i_blkbits; +ext4_lblk_t written_blk, end_blk; + +/* +* Note that EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize can get extended up to +* inode->i_size while the I/O was running due to the writeback of +* delalloc blocks. But, the code in ext4_iomap_alloc() is careful to +* use zeroed/unwritten extents if this is possible and thus we won't +* leave uninitialized blocks in a file even if we didn't succeed in +* writing as much as we planned. +*/ +WARN_ON_ONCE (i_size_read (inode) <EXT4_I (inode)->i_disksize); +if (offset + count <=EXT4_I (inode)->i_disksize) +return written; + +if (written <0 ) + goto truncate; + + handle =ext4_journal_start (inode,EXT4_HT_INODE ,2 ); +if (IS_ERR (handle)) { + written =PTR_ERR (handle); + goto truncate; + } + +if (ext4_update_inode_size (inode, offset + written)) +ext4_mark_inode_dirty (handle, inode); + +/* +* We may need to truncate allocated but not written blocks beyond EOF. +*/ + written_blk =ALIGN (offset + written,1 << blkbits); + end_blk =ALIGN (offset + count,1 << blkbits); +if (written_blk < end_blk &&ext4_can_truncate (inode)) + truncate = true; + +/* +* Remove the inode from the orphan list if it has been extended and +* everything went OK. +*/ +if (!truncate && inode->i_nlink) +ext4_orphan_del (handle, inode); +ext4_journal_stop (handle); + +if (truncate) { +truncate: +ext4_truncate_failed_write (inode); +/* +* If the truncate operation failed early, then the inode may +* still be on the orphan list. In that case, we need to try +* remove the inode from the in-memory linked list. +*/ +if (inode->i_nlink) +ext4_orphan_del (NULL , inode); + } + +return written; +} +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_DAX static ssize_t ext4_dax_write_iter (struct kiocb *iocb,struct iov_iter *from) { -struct inode *inode =file_inode (iocb->ki_filp);ssize_t ret; +size_t count; +loff_t offset; +struct inode *inode =file_inode (iocb->ki_filp);if (!inode_trylock (inode)) {if (iocb->ki_flags &IOCB_NOWAIT )
@@ -255,7 +321,10 @@ ext4_dax_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)if (ret) goto out; + offset = iocb->ki_pos; + count =iov_iter_count (from); ret =dax_iomap_rw (iocb, from, &ext4_iomap_ops); + ret =ext4_handle_inode_extension (inode, ret, offset, count); out:inode_unlock (inode);if (ret >0 )
fs/ext4/inode.c +1 -47
54 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 3 lines
2.20.1 --<M>--
Re: [PATCH v5 09/12] ext4: move inode extension/truncate code out from ->iomap_end() callback
Quoted 13 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
In preparation for implementing the iomap direct I/O modifications, the inode extension/truncate code needs to be moved out from the
ext4_iomap_end()callback. For direct I/O, if the current code remained, it would behave incorrrectly. Updating the inode size prior to converting unwritten extents would potentially allow a racing direct I/O read to find unwritten extents before being converted correctly.The inode extension/truncate code now resides within a new helper
ext4_handle_inode_extension(). This function has been designed so that it can accommodate for both DAX and direct I/O extension/truncate operations.
Quoted 6 lines
Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>--- fs/ext4/file.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- fs/ext4/inode.c | 48 +-------------------------------- 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
The patch looks good to me. You can add:
One nit below:
fs/ext4/file.c static ssize_t ext4_write_checks(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from) · line 238
Quoted 2 lines
fs/ext4/file.c +2
-0+static ssize_t ext4_handle_inode_extension (struct inode *inode,ssize_t written, +loff_t offset,size_t count)
IMHO a bit more logical ordering of arguments would be 'inode, offset, written, count'...
Honza
Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR
Re: [PATCH v5 09/12] ext4: move inode extension/truncate code out from ->iomap_end() callback
Quoted 21 lines · Jan Kara
Quoted 13 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
In preparation for implementing the iomap direct I/O modifications, the inode extension/truncate code needs to be moved out from the
ext4_iomap_end()callback. For direct I/O, if the current code remained, it would behave incorrrectly. Updating the inode size prior to converting unwritten extents would potentially allow a racing direct I/O read to find unwritten extents before being converted correctly.The inode extension/truncate code now resides within a new helper
ext4_handle_inode_extension(). This function has been designed so that it can accommodate for both DAX and direct I/O extension/truncate operations.Quoted 6 lines
Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>--- fs/ext4/file.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- fs/ext4/inode.c | 48 +-------------------------------- 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
Quoted 3 lines
The patch looks good to me. You can add:
Reviewed-by Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Thank you!
Quoted 5 lines
fs/ext4/file.c static ssize_t ext4_write_checks(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from) · line 238
Quoted 2 lines
fs/ext4/file.c +2
-0+static ssize_t ext4_handle_inode_extension (struct inode *inode,ssize_t written, +loff_t offset,size_t count)IMHO a bit more logical ordering of arguments would be 'inode, offset, written, count'...
Funnily enough, I originally had the arguments ordered as you've suggested, but then decided to reorder them this way last minute. No objections to reshuffling them around.
--<M>--
PATCH v5 10/12 ext4: move inode extension check out from ext4_iomap_alloc()
In reply to Matthew BobrowskiLift the inode extension/orphan list handling code out from ext4_iomap_alloc() and apply it within the ext4_dax_write_iter() function.
--- fs/ext4/file.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- fs/ext4/inode.c | 22 ---------------------- 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
fs/ext4/file.c +20 -1
@@ -304,6 +304,8 @@ ext4_dax_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)ssize_t ret;size_t count;loff_t offset; +handle_t *handle; +bool extend = false;struct inode *inode =file_inode (iocb->ki_filp);if (!inode_trylock (inode)) {
@@ -323,8 +325,25 @@ ext4_dax_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from) offset = iocb->ki_pos; count =iov_iter_count (from); +if (offset + count >EXT4_I (inode)->i_disksize) { + handle =ext4_journal_start (inode,EXT4_HT_INODE ,2 ); +if (IS_ERR (handle)) { + ret =PTR_ERR (handle); + goto out; + } + + ret =ext4_orphan_add (handle, inode); +if (ret) { +ext4_journal_stop (handle); + goto out; + } + extend = true; +ext4_journal_stop (handle); + } + ret =dax_iomap_rw (iocb, from, &ext4_iomap_ops); - ret =ext4_handle_inode_extension (inode, ret, offset, count); +if (extend) + ret =ext4_handle_inode_extension (inode, ret, offset, count); out:inode_unlock (inode);if (ret >0 )
fs/ext4/inode.c +0 -22
@@ -3443,7 +3443,6 @@ static int ext4_iomap_alloc(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_map_blocks *map, unsigned int flags) {handle_t *handle; -u8 blkbits = inode->i_blkbits;int ret, dio_credits, retries =0 ;/*
@@ -3466,28 +3465,7 @@ static int ext4_iomap_alloc(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_map_blocks *map,return PTR_ERR (handle); ret =ext4_map_blocks (handle, inode, map,EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE_ZERO ); -if (ret <0 ) - goto journal_stop; - -/* -* If we have allocated blocks beyond EOF, we need to ensure that -* they're truncated if we crash before updating the inode size -* metadata within ext4_iomap_end(). For faults, we don't need to do -* that (and cannot due to the orphan list operations needing an -* inode_lock()). If we happen to instantiate blocks beyond EOF, it is -* because we race with a truncate operation, which already has added -* the inode onto the orphan list. -*/ -if (!(flags &IOMAP_FAULT ) && map->m_lblk + map->m_len > - (i_size_read (inode) + (1 << blkbits) -1 ) >> blkbits) { -int err; - - err =ext4_orphan_add (handle, inode); -if (err <0 ) - ret = err; - } -journal_stop:ext4_journal_stop (handle);if (ret == -ENOSPC &&ext4_should_retry_alloc (inode->i_sb, &retries)) goto retry;
Signature · 3 lines
2.20.1 --<M>--
PATCH v5 11/12 ext4: reorder map->m_flags checks in ext4_set_iomap()
In reply to Matthew BobrowskiFor the direct I/O iomap write changes that follow in this patch series, we need to accommodate for the case where the block mapping flags passed to ext4_map_blocks() result in map->m_flags having both EXT4_MAP_MAPPED and EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN bits set. In order for allocated unwritten extents to be converted correctly in the ->end_io() handler, the iomap->type must be set to IOMAP_UNWRITTEN for cases where map->m_flags has EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN set. Hence the reason why we reshuffle the conditional statement in this patch.
This change is a no-op for DAX as the block mapping flags passed to ext4_map_blocks() when the inode IS_DAX never results in both EXT4_MAP_MAPPED and EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN being set at once.
--- fs/ext4/inode.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
fs/ext4/inode.c +12 -3
@@ -3428,10 +3428,19 @@ static void ext4_set_iomap(struct inode *inode, struct iomap *iomap, iomap->length = (u64 ) map->m_len << blkbits;if (map->m_flags & (EXT4_MAP_MAPPED |EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN )) { -if (map->m_flags &EXT4_MAP_MAPPED ) - iomap->type =IOMAP_MAPPED ; -else if (map->m_flags &EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN ) +/* +* Flags passed into ext4_map_blocks() for direct I/O writes +* can result in map->m_flags having both EXT4_MAP_MAPPED and +* EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN bits set. In order for any allocated +* extents to be converted to written extents correctly in the +* ->end_io() handler, we need to ensure that the iomap->type +* is set appropriately. Hence the reason why we need to check +* whether EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN is set first. +*/ +if (map->m_flags &EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN ) iomap->type =IOMAP_UNWRITTEN ; +else if (map->m_flags &EXT4_MAP_MAPPED ) + iomap->type =IOMAP_MAPPED ; iomap->addr = (u64 ) map->m_pblk << blkbits; }else { iomap->type =IOMAP_HOLE ;
Signature · 3 lines
2.20.1 --<M>--
PATCH v5 12/12 ext4: introduce direct I/O write using iomap infrastructure
In reply to Matthew BobrowskiThis patch introduces a new direct I/O write path which makes use of the iomap infrastructure.
All direct I/O writes are now passed from the ->write_iter() callback through to the new direct I/O handler ext4_dio_write_iter(). This function is responsible for calling into the iomap infrastructure via iomap_dio_rw().
Code snippets from the existing direct I/O write code within ext4_file_write_iter() such as, checking whether the I/O request is unaligned asynchronous I/O, or whether the write will result in an overwrite have effectively been moved out and into the new direct I/O ->write_iter() handler.
The block mapping flags that are eventually passed down to ext4_map_blocks() from the *_get_block_*() suite of routines have been taken out and introduced within ext4_iomap_alloc().
For inode extension cases, ext4_handle_inode_extension() is effectively the function responsible for performing such metadata updates. This is called after iomap_dio_rw() has returned so that we can safely determine whether we need to potentially truncate any allocated blocks that may have been prepared for this direct I/O write. We don't perform the inode extension, or truncate operations from the ->end_io() handler as we don't have the original I/O 'length' available there. The ->end_io() however is responsible fo converting allocated unwritten extents to written extents.
In the instance of a short write, we fallback and complete the remainder of the I/O using buffered I/O via ext4_buffered_write_iter().
The existing buffer_head direct I/O implementation has been removed as it's now redundant.
--- fs/ext4/ext4.h | 3 - fs/ext4/extents.c | 4 +- fs/ext4/file.c | 236 ++++++++++++++++++-------- fs/ext4/inode.c | 411 +++++----------------------------------------- 4 files changed, 207 insertions(+), 447 deletions(-)
fs/ext4/ext4.h +0 -3
@@ -1579,7 +1579,6 @@ enum {EXT4_STATE_NO_EXPAND ,/* No space for expansion */ EXT4_STATE_DA_ALLOC_CLOSE ,/* Alloc DA blks on close */ EXT4_STATE_EXT_MIGRATE ,/* Inode is migrating */ -EXT4_STATE_DIO_UNWRITTEN ,/* need convert on dio done*/ EXT4_STATE_NEWENTRY ,/* File just added to dir */ EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA ,/* may have in-inode data */ EXT4_STATE_EXT_PRECACHED, /* extents have been precached */
@@ -2560,8 +2559,6 @@ int ext4_get_block_unwritten(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock, struct buffer_head *bh_result, int create);int ext4_get_block (struct inode *inode,sector_t iblock,struct buffer_head *bh_result,int create); -int ext4_dio_get_block (struct inode *inode,sector_t iblock, -struct buffer_head *bh_result,int create);int ext4_da_get_block_prep (struct inode *inode,sector_t iblock,struct buffer_head *bh,int create); int ext4_walk_page_buffers(handle_t *handle,
fs/ext4/extents.c +1 -3
@@ -1760,9 +1760,7 @@ ext4_can_extents_be_merged(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_extent *ex1,* case. */ if (ext4_ext_is_unwritten (ex1) && - (ext4_test_inode_state (inode,EXT4_STATE_DIO_UNWRITTEN ) || -atomic_read (&EXT4_I (inode)->i_unwritten) || - (ext1_ee_len + ext2_ee_len >EXT_UNWRITTEN_MAX_LEN ))) + ext1_ee_len + ext2_ee_len >EXT_UNWRITTEN_MAX_LEN )return 0 ;#ifdef AGGRESSIVE_TEST if (ext1_ee_len >=4 )
fs/ext4/file.c +164 -72
295 lines not on this page · raw message
fs/ext4/inode.c +42 -369
459 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 3 lines
2.20.1 --<M>--
Re: [PATCH v5 12/12] ext4: introduce direct I/O write using iomap infrastructure
Quoted 35 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
This patch introduces a new direct I/O write path which makes use of the iomap infrastructure.
All direct I/O writes are now passed from the ->write_iter() callback through to the new direct I/O handler
ext4_dio_write_iter(). This function is responsible for calling into the iomap infrastructure viaiomap_dio_rw().Code snippets from the existing direct I/O write code within
ext4_file_write_iter()such as, checking whether the I/O request is unaligned asynchronous I/O, or whether the write will result in an overwrite have effectively been moved out and into the new direct I/O ->write_iter() handler.The block mapping flags that are eventually passed down to
ext4_map_blocks()from the *_get_block_*() suite of routines have been taken out and introduced withinext4_iomap_alloc().For inode extension cases,
ext4_handle_inode_extension()is effectively the function responsible for performing such metadata updates. This is called afteriomap_dio_rw()has returned so that we can safely determine whether we need to potentially truncate any allocated blocks that may have been prepared for this direct I/O write. We don't perform the inode extension, or truncate operations from the ->end_io() handler as we don't have the original I/O 'length' available there. The ->end_io() however is responsible fo converting allocated unwritten extents to written extents.In the instance of a short write, we fallback and complete the remainder of the I/O using buffered I/O via
ext4_buffered_write_iter().The existing
buffer_headdirect I/O implementation has been removed as it's now redundant.
Quoted 7 lines
Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>--- fs/ext4/ext4.h | 3 - fs/ext4/extents.c | 4 +- fs/ext4/file.c | 236 ++++++++++++++++++-------- fs/ext4/inode.c | 411 +++++----------------------------------------- 4 files changed, 207 insertions(+), 447 deletions(-)
The patch looks good to me! You can add:
One nitpick below:
Quoted 10 lines
fs/ext4/file.c +10
-0+if (extend) { + ret =ext4_handle_inode_extension (inode, ret, offset, count); + +/* +* We may have failed to remove the inode from the orphan list +* in the case that the i_disksize got update due to delalloc +* writeback while the direct I/O was running. We need to make +* sure we remove it from the orphan list as if we've +* prematurely popped it onto the list. +*/
fs/ext4/file.c static ssize_t ext4_handle_inode_extension(struct inode *inode, ssize_t written, · line 432
Quoted 10 lines
fs/ext4/file.c +10
-0+if (!list_empty (&EXT4_I (inode)->i_orphan)) { + handle =ext4_journal_start (inode,EXT4_HT_INODE ,2 ); +if (IS_ERR (handle)) { + ret =PTR_ERR (handle); +if (inode->i_nlink) +ext4_orphan_del (NULL , inode); + goto out; + } + +if (inode->i_nlink)
This check can be joined with the list_empty() check above to save us from unnecessarily starting a transaction. Also I was wondering whether it would not make more sense have this orphan handling bit also in ext4_handle_inode_extension(). ext4_dax_write_iter() doesn't strictly need it (as for DAX i_disksize cannot currently change while ext4_dax_write_iter() is running) but it would look more robust to me for the future users and it certainly doesn't hurt ext4_dax_write_iter() case.
fs/ext4/file.c static ssize_t ext4_handle_inode_extension(struct inode *inode, ssize_t written, · line 436
Quoted 4 lines
fs/ext4/file.c +4
-0+ext4_orphan_del (handle, inode); +ext4_journal_stop (handle); + } + }
Honza
Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR
Re: [PATCH v5 12/12] ext4: introduce direct I/O write using iomap infrastructure
Quoted 44 lines · Jan Kara
Quoted 35 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
This patch introduces a new direct I/O write path which makes use of the iomap infrastructure.
All direct I/O writes are now passed from the ->write_iter() callback through to the new direct I/O handler
ext4_dio_write_iter(). This function is responsible for calling into the iomap infrastructure viaiomap_dio_rw().Code snippets from the existing direct I/O write code within
ext4_file_write_iter()such as, checking whether the I/O request is unaligned asynchronous I/O, or whether the write will result in an overwrite have effectively been moved out and into the new direct I/O ->write_iter() handler.The block mapping flags that are eventually passed down to
ext4_map_blocks()from the *_get_block_*() suite of routines have been taken out and introduced withinext4_iomap_alloc().For inode extension cases,
ext4_handle_inode_extension()is effectively the function responsible for performing such metadata updates. This is called afteriomap_dio_rw()has returned so that we can safely determine whether we need to potentially truncate any allocated blocks that may have been prepared for this direct I/O write. We don't perform the inode extension, or truncate operations from the ->end_io() handler as we don't have the original I/O 'length' available there. The ->end_io() however is responsible fo converting allocated unwritten extents to written extents.In the instance of a short write, we fallback and complete the remainder of the I/O using buffered I/O via
ext4_buffered_write_iter().The existing
buffer_headdirect I/O implementation has been removed as it's now redundant.Quoted 7 lines
Signed-off-by Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>--- fs/ext4/ext4.h | 3 - fs/ext4/extents.c | 4 +- fs/ext4/file.c | 236 ++++++++++++++++++-------- fs/ext4/inode.c | 411 +++++----------------------------------------- 4 files changed, 207 insertions(+), 447 deletions(-)
Quoted 3 lines
The patch looks good to me! You can add:
Reviewed-by Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Thanks Jan! :)
Quoted 17 lines
One nitpick below:
Quoted 15 lines
fs/ext4/file.c +15
-0+if (extend) { + ret =ext4_handle_inode_extension (inode, ret, offset, count); + +/* +* We may have failed to remove the inode from the orphan list +* in the case that the i_disksize got update due to delalloc +* writeback while the direct I/O was running. We need to make +* sure we remove it from the orphan list as if we've +* prematurely popped it onto the list. +*/ +if (!list_empty (&EXT4_I (inode)->i_orphan)) { + handle =ext4_journal_start (inode,EXT4_HT_INODE ,2 ); +if (IS_ERR (handle)) { + ret =PTR_ERR (handle); +if (inode->i_nlink)
Quoted 8 lines
fs/ext4/file.c static ssize_t ext4_handle_inode_extension(struct inode *inode, ssize_t written, · line 432
Quoted 5 lines
fs/ext4/file.c +5
-0+ext4_orphan_del (NULL , inode); + goto out; + } + +if (inode->i_nlink)This check can be joined with the
list_empty()check above to save us from unnecessarily starting a transaction.
Yes, easy done.
Quoted 7 lines
Also I was wondering whether it would not make more sense have this orphan handling bit also in
ext4_handle_inode_extension().ext4_dax_write_iter()doesn't strictly need it (as for DAXi_disksizecannot currently change whileext4_dax_write_iter()is running) but it would look more robust to me for the future users and it certainly doesn't hurtext4_dax_write_iter()case.
I was thinking the same, but to be honest I wasn't entirely sure how it would pan out for the DAX code path. However, seeing as though you don't forsee there being any problems, then I can't really think of a reason not to roll this up into ext4_handle_inode_extension().
So, in ext4_handle_inode_extension() for the initial check against i_disksize, rather than returning 'written' and then having ext4_dio_write_iter() perform the cleanup, we could simply jump to a chunk of code in ext4_handle_inode_extension() and deal with it there, or quite literally just cleanup if that branch is taken there and then seeing as though it's not really needed in any other case? What do you think?
--<M>--
Jan Kara
reviewerRe: [PATCH v5 12/12] ext4: introduce direct I/O write using iomap infrastructure
Quoted 40 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
Quoted 15 lines · Jan Kara
Quoted 15 lines
fs/ext4/file.c +15
-0+if (extend) { + ret =ext4_handle_inode_extension (inode, ret, offset, count); + +/* +* We may have failed to remove the inode from the orphan list +* in the case that the i_disksize got update due to delalloc +* writeback while the direct I/O was running. We need to make +* sure we remove it from the orphan list as if we've +* prematurely popped it onto the list. +*/ +if (!list_empty (&EXT4_I (inode)->i_orphan)) { + handle =ext4_journal_start (inode,EXT4_HT_INODE ,2 ); +if (IS_ERR (handle)) { + ret =PTR_ERR (handle); +if (inode->i_nlink)Quoted 8 lines
fs/ext4/file.c static ssize_t ext4_handle_inode_extension(struct inode *inode, ssize_t written, · line 432
Quoted 5 lines
fs/ext4/file.c +5
-0+ext4_orphan_del (NULL , inode); + goto out; + } + +if (inode->i_nlink)This check can be joined with the
list_empty()check above to save us from unnecessarily starting a transaction.Yes, easy done.
Quoted 7 lines
Also I was wondering whether it would not make more sense have this orphan handling bit also in
ext4_handle_inode_extension().ext4_dax_write_iter()doesn't strictly need it (as for DAXi_disksizecannot currently change whileext4_dax_write_iter()is running) but it would look more robust to me for the future users and it certainly doesn't hurtext4_dax_write_iter()case.I was thinking the same, but to be honest I wasn't entirely sure how it would pan out for the DAX code path. However, seeing as though you don't forsee there being any problems, then I can't really think of a reason not to roll this up into
ext4_handle_inode_extension().
Quoted 7 lines
So, in
ext4_handle_inode_extension()for the initial check againsti_disksize, rather than returning 'written' and then havingext4_dio_write_iter()perform the cleanup, we could simply jump to a chunk of code inext4_handle_inode_extension()and deal with it there, or quite literally just cleanup if that branch is taken there and then seeing as though it's not really needed in any other case? What do you think?
Yeah, the last option makes the most sense to me.
Honza
Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR
Theodore Y. Ts'o
maintainerHi Matthew, thanks for your work on this patch series!
I applied it against 4c3, and ran a quick test run on it, and found the following locking problem. To reproduce:
kvm-xfstests -c nojournal generic/113
generic/113 [09:27:19][ 5.841937] run fstests generic/113 at 2019-10-21 09:27:19
[ 7.959477]
[ 7.959798] ============================================
[ 7.960518] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ 7.961225] 5.4.0-rc3-xfstests-00012-g7fe6ea084e48 #1238 Not tainted
[ 7.961991] --------------------------------------------
[ 7.962569] aio-stress/1516 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 7.963129] ffff9fd4791148c8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){++++}, at: __generic_file_fsync+0x3e/0xb0
[ 7.964109]
[ 7.964109] but task is already holding lock:
[ 7.964740] ffff9fd4791148c8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){++++}, at: ext4_dio_write_iter+0x15b/0x430
[ 7.965763]
[ 7.965763] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 7.966630] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 7.966630]
[ 7.967424] CPU0
[ 7.967760] ----
[ 7.968097] lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12);
[ 7.968827] lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12);
[ 7.969558]
[ 7.969558] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 7.969558]
[ 7.970518] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 7.970518]
[ 7.971592] 1 lock held by aio-stress/1516:
[ 7.972267] #0: ffff9fd4791148c8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){++++}, at: ext4_dio_write_iter+0x15b/0x430
[ 7.973807]
[ 7.973807] stack backtrace:
[ 7.974510] CPU: 0 PID: 1516 Comm: aio-stress Not tainted 5.4.0-rc3-xfstests-00012-g7fe6ea084e48 #1238
[ 7.976053] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014
[ 7.977327] Call Trace:
[ 7.977700] dump_stack+0x67/0x90
[ 7.978198] __lock_acquire.cold+0x130/0x1f7
[ 7.978829] ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
[ 7.979659] lock_acquire+0x9a/0x160
[ 7.980320] ? __generic_file_fsync+0x3e/0xb0
[ 7.981014] down_write+0x40/0x110
[ 7.981717] ? __generic_file_fsync+0x3e/0xb0
[ 7.982676] __generic_file_fsync+0x3e/0xb0
[ 7.983454] ext4_sync_file+0x277/0x4e0
[ 7.984188] iomap_dio_complete+0x112/0x130
[ 7.984971] ? iomap_dio_rw+0x3a0/0x4b0
[ 7.985647] iomap_dio_rw+0x419/0x4b0
[ 7.986317] ? ext4_dio_write_iter+0x296/0x430
[ 7.987039] ext4_dio_write_iter+0x296/0x430
[ 7.987786] aio_write+0xef/0x1c0
[ 7.988284] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x14/0x30
[ 7.988822] ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10
[ 7.989234] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xc/0xc0
[ 7.989719] __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x399/0x5f0
[ 7.990315] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x14/0x30
[ 7.990917] ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10
[ 7.991473] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xc/0xc0
[ 7.992097] ? io_submit_one+0x141/0x5a0
[ 7.992741] io_submit_one+0x141/0x5a0
[ 7.993354] __x64_sys_io_submit+0x9a/0x290
[ 7.993853] ? do_syscall_64+0x50/0x1b0
[ 7.994250] ? __ia32_sys_io_destroy+0x10/0x10
[ 7.994748] do_syscall_64+0x50/0x1b0
[ 7.995175] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[ 7.995761] RIP: 0033:0x55d1268c2d17
[ 7.996270] Code: 00 75 08 8b 47 0c 39 47 08 74 08 e9 b3 ff ff ff 0f 1f 00 31 c0 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 b8 d1 00 00 00 0f 05 <c3> 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 48 63 ff b8 ce 00 00 00 0f 05 c3 0f 1f
[ 7.999131] RSP: 002b:00007f090fb0bd88 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000d1
[ 7.999994] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055d128135010 RCX: 000055d1268c2d17
[ 8.000881] RDX: 000055d128135010 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: 00007f0907263000
[ 8.001765] RBP: 000055d128129560 R08: 00007fff421ae080 R09: 00007f090fb0bd68
[ 8.002824] R10: 00007f090fb0bd60 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000008
[ 8.004016] R13: 00007f090fb0bdb0 R14: 00007f090fb0bda0 R15: 000055d128129560I'm other test configurations are still running, and I haven't had a chance to do a detailed review on it, but I'll try to get to it this week.
Thanks,
- Ted
Jan Kara
reviewerQuoted 8 lines · Theodore Y. Ts'o
Hi Matthew, thanks for your work on this patch series!
I applied it against 4c3, and ran a quick test run on it, and found the following locking problem. To reproduce:
kvm-xfstests -c nojournal generic/113
generic/113 [09:27:19][ 5.841937] run fstests generic/113 at 2019-10-21 09:27:19
Quoted 10 lines
[ 7.959477]
[ 7.959798] ============================================
[ 7.960518] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ 7.961225] 5.4.0-rc3-xfstests-00012-g7fe6ea084e48 #1238 Not tainted
[ 7.961991] --------------------------------------------
[ 7.962569] aio-stress/1516 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 7.963129] ffff9fd4791148c8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){++++}, at: __generic_file_fsync+0x3e/0xb0
[ 7.964109]
[ 7.964109] but task is already holding lock:
[ 7.964740] ffff9fd4791148c8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){++++}, at: ext4_dio_write_iter+0x15b/0x430This is going to be a tricky one. With iomap, the inode locking is handled by the filesystem while calling generic_write_sync() is done by iomap_dio_rw(). I would really prefer to avoid tweaking iomap_dio_rw() not to call generic_write_sync(). So we need to remove inode_lock from __generic_file_fsync() (used from ext4_sync_file()). This locking is mostly for legacy purposes and we don't need this in ext4 AFAICT - but removing the lock from __generic_file_fsync() would mean auditing all legacy filesystems that use this to make sure flushing inode & its metadata buffer list while it is possibly changing cannot result in something unexpected. I don't want to clutter this series with it so we are left with reimplementing __generic_file_fsync() inside ext4 without inode_lock. Not too bad but not great either. Thoughts?
Honza
Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR
Quoted 20 lines · Jan Kara
Quoted 8 lines · Theodore Y. Ts'o
Hi Matthew, thanks for your work on this patch series!
I applied it against 4c3, and ran a quick test run on it, and found the following locking problem. To reproduce:
kvm-xfstests -c nojournal generic/113
generic/113 [09:27:19][ 5.841937] run fstests generic/113 at 2019-10-21 09:27:19
Quoted 10 lines
[ 7.959477] [ 7.959798] ============================================ [ 7.960518] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 7.961225] 5.4.0-rc3-xfstests-00012-g7fe6ea084e48 #1238 Not tainted [ 7.961991] -------------------------------------------- [ 7.962569] aio-stress/1516 is trying to acquire lock: [ 7.963129] ffff9fd4791148c8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){++++}, at: __generic_file_fsync+0x3e/0xb0 [ 7.964109] [ 7.964109] but task is already holding lock: [ 7.964740] ffff9fd4791148c8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){++++}, at: ext4_dio_write_iter+0x15b/0x430
Quoted 4 lines
This is going to be a tricky one. With iomap, the inode locking is handled by the filesystem while calling
generic_write_sync()is done byiomap_dio_rw(). I would really prefer to avoid tweakingiomap_dio_rw()not to callgeneric_write_sync().
You can't remove it from there, because that will break O_DSYNC AIO+DIO. i.e. generic_write_sync() needs to be called before iocb->ki_complete() is called in the AIO completion path, and that means filesystems using iomap_dio_rw need to be be able to run generic_write_sync() without taking the inode_lock().
Quoted 9 lines
So we need to remove
inode_lockfrom__generic_file_fsync()(used fromext4_sync_file()). This locking is mostly for legacy purposes and we don't need this in ext4 AFAICT - but removing the lock from__generic_file_fsync()would mean auditing all legacy filesystems that use this to make sure flushing inode & its metadata buffer list while it is possibly changing cannot result in something unexpected. I don't want to clutter this series with it so we are left with reimplementing__generic_file_fsync()inside ext4 withoutinode_lock. Not too bad but not great either. Thoughts?
XFS has implemented it's own ->fsync operation pretty much forever without issues. It's basically:
1. flush dirty cached data w/ WB_SYNC_ALL
2. flush dirty cached metadata (i.e. journal force)
3. flush device caches if journal force didn't, keeping in mind the requirements of data and journal being placed on different devices.
The ext4 variant shouldn't need to be any more complex than that...
Cheers,
Dave.
Signature · 2 lines
Dave Chinner [email protected]
Jan Kara
reviewerQuoted 45 lines · Dave Chinner
Quoted 20 lines · Jan Kara
Quoted 8 lines · Theodore Y. Ts'o
Hi Matthew, thanks for your work on this patch series!
I applied it against 4c3, and ran a quick test run on it, and found the following locking problem. To reproduce:
kvm-xfstests -c nojournal generic/113
generic/113 [09:27:19][ 5.841937] run fstests generic/113 at 2019-10-21 09:27:19
Quoted 10 lines
[ 7.959477] [ 7.959798] ============================================ [ 7.960518] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 7.961225] 5.4.0-rc3-xfstests-00012-g7fe6ea084e48 #1238 Not tainted [ 7.961991] -------------------------------------------- [ 7.962569] aio-stress/1516 is trying to acquire lock: [ 7.963129] ffff9fd4791148c8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){++++}, at: __generic_file_fsync+0x3e/0xb0 [ 7.964109] [ 7.964109] but task is already holding lock: [ 7.964740] ffff9fd4791148c8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){++++}, at: ext4_dio_write_iter+0x15b/0x430Quoted 4 lines
This is going to be a tricky one. With iomap, the inode locking is handled by the filesystem while calling
generic_write_sync()is done byiomap_dio_rw(). I would really prefer to avoid tweakingiomap_dio_rw()not to callgeneric_write_sync().You can't remove it from there, because that will break
O_DSYNCAIO+DIO. i.e.generic_write_sync()needs to be called beforeiocb->ki_complete()is called in the AIO completion path, and that means filesystems usingiomap_dio_rwneed to be be able to rungeneric_write_sync()without taking theinode_lock().Quoted 9 lines
So we need to remove
inode_lockfrom__generic_file_fsync()(used fromext4_sync_file()). This locking is mostly for legacy purposes and we don't need this in ext4 AFAICT - but removing the lock from__generic_file_fsync()would mean auditing all legacy filesystems that use this to make sure flushing inode & its metadata buffer list while it is possibly changing cannot result in something unexpected. I don't want to clutter this series with it so we are left with reimplementing__generic_file_fsync()inside ext4 withoutinode_lock. Not too bad but not great either. Thoughts?XFS has implemented it's own ->fsync operation pretty much forever without issues. It's basically:
Quoted 7 lines
1. flush dirty cached data w/
WB_SYNC_ALL
2. flush dirty cached metadata (i.e. journal force)
3. flush device caches if journal force didn't, keeping in mind the requirements of data and journal being placed on different devices.The ext4 variant shouldn't need to be any more complex than that...
Yeah, that's what we do for the common case as well. But when the filesystem is created without a journal (i.e., ext2 compatibility mode) we currently use the old fsync implementation including __generic_file_fsync(). But as I wrote above, duplicating those ~5 lines out of __generic_file_fsync() we really care about is not a big deal.
Honza
Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR
Quoted 20 lines · Jan Kara
Quoted 8 lines · Theodore Y. Ts'o
Hi Matthew, thanks for your work on this patch series!
I applied it against 4c3, and ran a quick test run on it, and found the following locking problem. To reproduce:
kvm-xfstests -c nojournal generic/113
generic/113 [09:27:19][ 5.841937] run fstests generic/113 at 2019-10-21 09:27:19
Quoted 10 lines
[ 7.959477] [ 7.959798] ============================================ [ 7.960518] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 7.961225] 5.4.0-rc3-xfstests-00012-g7fe6ea084e48 #1238 Not tainted [ 7.961991] -------------------------------------------- [ 7.962569] aio-stress/1516 is trying to acquire lock: [ 7.963129] ffff9fd4791148c8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){++++}, at: __generic_file_fsync+0x3e/0xb0 [ 7.964109] [ 7.964109] but task is already holding lock: [ 7.964740] ffff9fd4791148c8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){++++}, at: ext4_dio_write_iter+0x15b/0x430
Quoted 12 lines
This is going to be a tricky one. With iomap, the inode locking is handled by the filesystem while calling
generic_write_sync()is done byiomap_dio_rw(). I would really prefer to avoid tweakingiomap_dio_rw()not to callgeneric_write_sync(). So we need to removeinode_lockfrom__generic_file_fsync()(used fromext4_sync_file()). This locking is mostly for legacy purposes and we don't need this in ext4 AFAICT - but removing the lock from__generic_file_fsync()would mean auditing all legacy filesystems that use this to make sure flushing inode & its metadata buffer list while it is possibly changing cannot result in something unexpected. I don't want to clutter this series with it so we are left with reimplementing__generic_file_fsync()inside ext4 withoutinode_lock. Not too bad but not great either. Thoughts?
So, I just looked at this on my lunch break and I think the simplest approach would be to just transfer the necessary chunks of code from within __generic_file_fsync() into ext4_sync_file() for !journal cases, minus the inode lock, and minus calling into __generic_file_fsync(). I don't forsee this causing any issues, but feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
If this is deemed to be OK, then I will go ahead and include this as a separate patch in my series.
--<M>--
Jan Kara
reviewerQuoted 34 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
Quoted 20 lines · Jan Kara
Quoted 8 lines · Theodore Y. Ts'o
Hi Matthew, thanks for your work on this patch series!
I applied it against 4c3, and ran a quick test run on it, and found the following locking problem. To reproduce:
kvm-xfstests -c nojournal generic/113
generic/113 [09:27:19][ 5.841937] run fstests generic/113 at 2019-10-21 09:27:19
Quoted 10 lines
[ 7.959477] [ 7.959798] ============================================ [ 7.960518] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 7.961225] 5.4.0-rc3-xfstests-00012-g7fe6ea084e48 #1238 Not tainted [ 7.961991] -------------------------------------------- [ 7.962569] aio-stress/1516 is trying to acquire lock: [ 7.963129] ffff9fd4791148c8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){++++}, at: __generic_file_fsync+0x3e/0xb0 [ 7.964109] [ 7.964109] but task is already holding lock: [ 7.964740] ffff9fd4791148c8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){++++}, at: ext4_dio_write_iter+0x15b/0x430Quoted 12 lines
This is going to be a tricky one. With iomap, the inode locking is handled by the filesystem while calling
generic_write_sync()is done byiomap_dio_rw(). I would really prefer to avoid tweakingiomap_dio_rw()not to callgeneric_write_sync(). So we need to removeinode_lockfrom__generic_file_fsync()(used fromext4_sync_file()). This locking is mostly for legacy purposes and we don't need this in ext4 AFAICT - but removing the lock from__generic_file_fsync()would mean auditing all legacy filesystems that use this to make sure flushing inode & its metadata buffer list while it is possibly changing cannot result in something unexpected. I don't want to clutter this series with it so we are left with reimplementing__generic_file_fsync()inside ext4 withoutinode_lock. Not too bad but not great either. Thoughts?
Quoted 6 lines
So, I just looked at this on my lunch break and I think the simplest approach would be to just transfer the necessary chunks of code from within
__generic_file_fsync()intoext4_sync_file()for !journal cases, minus the inode lock, and minus calling into__generic_file_fsync(). I don't forsee this causing any issues, but feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
Yes, that's what I'd suggest as well. In fact when doing that you can share file_write_and_wait_range() call with the one already in ext4_sync_file() use for other cases. Similarly with file_check_and_advance_wb_err(). So the copied bit will be really only:
ret = sync_mapping_buffers(inode->i_mapping);
if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_ALL))
goto out;
if (datasync && !(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_DATASYNC))
goto out;
err = sync_inode_metadata(inode, 1);
if (ret == 0)
ret = err;Quoted 2 lines
If this is deemed to be OK, then I will go ahead and include this as a separate patch in my series.
Yes, please.
Honza
Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR
Quoted 57 lines · Jan Kara
Quoted 34 lines · Matthew Bobrowski
Quoted 20 lines · Jan Kara
Quoted 8 lines · Theodore Y. Ts'o
Hi Matthew, thanks for your work on this patch series!
I applied it against 4c3, and ran a quick test run on it, and found the following locking problem. To reproduce:
kvm-xfstests -c nojournal generic/113
generic/113 [09:27:19][ 5.841937] run fstests generic/113 at 2019-10-21 09:27:19
Quoted 10 lines
[ 7.959477] [ 7.959798] ============================================ [ 7.960518] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 7.961225] 5.4.0-rc3-xfstests-00012-g7fe6ea084e48 #1238 Not tainted [ 7.961991] -------------------------------------------- [ 7.962569] aio-stress/1516 is trying to acquire lock: [ 7.963129] ffff9fd4791148c8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){++++}, at: __generic_file_fsync+0x3e/0xb0 [ 7.964109] [ 7.964109] but task is already holding lock: [ 7.964740] ffff9fd4791148c8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){++++}, at: ext4_dio_write_iter+0x15b/0x430Quoted 12 lines
This is going to be a tricky one. With iomap, the inode locking is handled by the filesystem while calling
generic_write_sync()is done byiomap_dio_rw(). I would really prefer to avoid tweakingiomap_dio_rw()not to callgeneric_write_sync(). So we need to removeinode_lockfrom__generic_file_fsync()(used fromext4_sync_file()). This locking is mostly for legacy purposes and we don't need this in ext4 AFAICT - but removing the lock from__generic_file_fsync()would mean auditing all legacy filesystems that use this to make sure flushing inode & its metadata buffer list while it is possibly changing cannot result in something unexpected. I don't want to clutter this series with it so we are left with reimplementing__generic_file_fsync()inside ext4 withoutinode_lock. Not too bad but not great either. Thoughts?Quoted 6 lines
So, I just looked at this on my lunch break and I think the simplest approach would be to just transfer the necessary chunks of code from within
__generic_file_fsync()intoext4_sync_file()for !journal cases, minus the inode lock, and minus calling into__generic_file_fsync(). I don't forsee this causing any issues, but feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.Yes, that's what I'd suggest as well. In fact when doing that you can share
file_write_and_wait_range()call with the one already inext4_sync_file()use for other cases. Similarly withfile_check_and_advance_wb_err(). So the copied bit will be really only:ret = sync_mapping_buffers(inode->i_mapping); if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_ALL)) goto out; if (datasync && !(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_DATASYNC)) goto out; err = sync_inode_metadata(inode, 1); if (ret == 0) ret = err;
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
If this is deemed to be OK, then I will go ahead and include this as a separate patch in my series.
Yes, please.
Heh!
I just finished writing and testing it and exactly what I've done (attached). Anyway, I will include it in v6. :)
--<M>--
From 4c82edb34324f91788c941956954d4e7e1886c2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matthew Bobrowski <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:43:23 +1100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: update ext4_sync_file() to not use
__generic_file_fsync()
When the filesystem is created without a journal, we eventually call into __generic_file_fsync() in order to write out all the modified in-core data to the permanent storage device. This function happens to try and obtain an inode_lock() while synchronizing the files buffer and it's associated metadata.
Generally, this is fine, however it becomes a problem when there is higher level code that has already obtained an inode_lock() as this leads to a recursive lock situation. This case is especially true when porting across direct I/O to iomap infrastructure as we obtain an inode_lock() early on in the I/O within ext4_dio_write_iter() and hold it until the I/O has been completed. Consequently, to not run into this specific issue, we move away from calling into __generic_file_fsync() and perform the necessary synchronization tasks within ext4_sync_file().
--- fs/ext4/fsync.c | 18 ++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
fs/ext4/fsync.c +14 -4
@@ -116,8 +116,21 @@ int ext4_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync) goto out; } + ret =file_write_and_wait_range (file, start, end); +if (ret) +return ret; +if (!journal) { - ret =__generic_file_fsync (file, start, end, datasync); + ret =sync_mapping_buffers (inode->i_mapping); +if (!(inode->i_state &I_DIRTY_ALL )) + goto out; +if (datasync && !(inode->i_state &I_DIRTY_DATASYNC )) + goto out; + + err =sync_inode_metadata (inode,1 ); +if (!ret) + ret = err; +if (!ret) ret =ext4_sync_parent (inode);if (test_opt (inode->i_sb,BARRIER ))
@@ -125,9 +138,6 @@ int ext4_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync) goto out; } - ret =file_write_and_wait_range (file, start, end); -if (ret) -return ret;/* * data=writeback,ordered: * The caller's filemap_fdatawrite()/wait will sync the data.
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
Maybe something like the version below which declutter the thing a bit?
fs/ext4/fsync.c +43 -22
@@ -80,6 +80,41 @@ static int ext4_sync_parent(struct inode *inode)return ret; } +static int ext4_fsync_nojournal (struct inode *inode,bool datasync, +bool *needs_barrier) +{ +int ret, err; + + ret =sync_mapping_buffers (inode->i_mapping); +if (!(inode->i_state &I_DIRTY_ALL )) +return ret; +if (datasync && !(inode->i_state &I_DIRTY_DATASYNC )) +return ret; + + err =sync_inode_metadata (inode,1 ); +if (!ret) + ret = err; + +if (!ret) + ret =ext4_sync_parent (inode); +if (test_opt (inode->i_sb,BARRIER )) + *needs_barrier = true; +return ret; +} + +static int ext4_fsync_journal (struct inode *inode,bool datasync, +bool *needs_barrier) +{ +struct ext4_inode_info *ei =EXT4_I (inode); +journal_t *journal =EXT4_SB (inode->i_sb)->s_journal; +tid_t commit_tid = datasync ? ei->i_datasync_tid : ei->i_sync_tid; + +if (journal->j_flags &JBD2_BARRIER && + !jbd2_trans_will_send_data_barrier (journal, commit_tid)) + *needs_barrier = true; +return jbd2_complete_transaction (journal, commit_tid); +} +/* * akpm: A new design for ext4_sync_file(). *
@@ -95,13 +130,11 @@ static int ext4_sync_parent(struct inode *inode)int ext4_sync_file (struct file *file,loff_t start,loff_t end,int datasync) {struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host; -struct ext4_inode_info *ei =EXT4_I (inode); -journal_t *journal =EXT4_SB (inode->i_sb)->s_journal; +struct ext4_sb_info *sbi =EXT4_SB (inode->i_sb);int ret =0 , err; -tid_t commit_tid;bool needs_barrier = false; -if (unlikely (ext4_forced_shutdown (EXT4_SB (inode->i_sb)))) +if (unlikely (ext4_forced_shutdown (sbi)))return -EIO ;J_ASSERT (ext4_journal_current_handle () ==NULL );
@@ -116,18 +149,10 @@ int ext4_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync) goto out; } -if (!journal) { - ret =__generic_file_fsync (file, start, end, datasync); -if (!ret) - ret =ext4_sync_parent (inode); -if (test_opt (inode->i_sb,BARRIER )) - goto issue_flush; - goto out; - } - ret =file_write_and_wait_range (file, start, end);if (ret)return ret; +/* * data=writeback,ordered: * The caller's filemap_fdatawrite()/wait will sync the data.
@@ -142,18 +167,14 @@ int ext4_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)* (they were dirtied by commit). But that's OK - the blocks are * safe in-journal, which is all fsync() needs to ensure. */ -if (ext4_should_journal_data (inode)) { +if (!sbi->s_journal) + ret =ext4_fsync_nojournal (inode, datasync, &needs_barrier); +else if (ext4_should_journal_data (inode)) ret =ext4_force_commit (inode->i_sb); - goto out; - } +else + ret =ext4_fsync_journal (inode, datasync, &needs_barrier); - commit_tid = datasync ? ei->i_datasync_tid : ei->i_sync_tid; -if (journal->j_flags &JBD2_BARRIER && - !jbd2_trans_will_send_data_barrier (journal, commit_tid)) - needs_barrier = true; - ret =jbd2_complete_transaction (journal, commit_tid);if (needs_barrier) { - issue_flush: err =blkdev_issue_flush (inode->i_sb->s_bdev,GFP_KERNEL ,NULL );if (!ret) ret = err;
Quoted 1 line · Christoph Hellwig
Maybe something like the version below which declutter the thing a bit?
Yeah, I like this suggestion Christoph. Super awesome.
Thank you!
--<M>--