WAN: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
PATCH 1/1 WAN: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
--- drivers/net/wan/farsync.h | 2 +- drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/net/wan/farsync.h +1 -1
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@struct fstioc_write {unsigned int size;unsigned int offset; -unsigned char data[0 ]; +unsigned char data[]; };
drivers/net/wan/wanxl.c +1 -1
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ struct card {struct sk_buff *rx_skbs[RX_QUEUE_LENGTH ];struct card_status *status;/* shared between host and card */ dma_addr_t status_address; -struct port ports[0 ];/* 1 - 4 port structures follow */ +struct port ports[];/* 1 - 4 port structures follow */ };
Signature · 1 line
2.25.0
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:23:17 -0600
Quoted 22 lines
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99:
struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; };By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
Quoted 7 lines
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit76497732932f("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")Signed-off-by Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Applied.