net: ip_fib: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 net: ip_fib: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
--- include/net/ip_fib.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
include/net/ip_fib.h +2 -2
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ struct fib_info {bool nh_updated;struct nexthop *nh;struct rcu_head rcu; -struct fib_nh fib_nh[0 ]; +struct fib_nh fib_nh[]; };
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ struct fib_table {int tb_num_default;struct rcu_head rcu;unsigned long *tb_data; -unsigned long __data[0 ]; +unsigned long __data[]; };struct fib_dump_filter {
Signature · 1 line
2.25.0
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 06:03:52 -0600
Quoted 22 lines
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99:
struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; };By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
Quoted 7 lines
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit76497732932f("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")Signed-off-by Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Applied.