NXP DSPI bugfixes and support for LS1028A
Subsystems (4)
Vladimir Oltean
maintainerv3 cover NXP DSPI bugfixes and support for LS1028A
From: Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]>
This series addresses a few issues that were missed during the previous series "[PATCH 00/12] TCFQ to XSPI migration for NXP DSPI driver", on SoCs other than LS1021A and LS1043A. DMA mode has been completely broken by that series, and XSPI mode never worked on little-endian controllers.
Then it introduces support for the LS1028A chip, whose compatible has recently been documented here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/[email protected]/
The device tree for the LS1028A SoC is extended with DMA channels definition, such that even though the default operating mode is XSPI, one can simply change DSPI_XSPI_MODE to DSPI_DMA_MODE in the devtype_data structure of the driver and use that instead.
I don't expect the "fixes" patches to reach very far down the stable pipe, since there has been pretty heavy refactoring in this driver.
For testing, benchmarking and debugging, the mikroBUS connector on the LS1028A-RDB is made available via spidev.
Vladimir Oltean (7):
spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Don't access reserved fields in SPI_MCR
spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Avoid use-after-free in interrupt mode
spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Fix little endian access to PUSHR CMD and TXDATA
spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Fix bits-per-word acceleration in DMA mode
spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Add support for LS1028A
arm64: dts: ls1028a: Specify the DMA channels for the DSPI controllers
arm64: dts: ls1028a-rdb: Add a spidev node for the mikroBUS
.../boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts | 14 ++ .../arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi | 6 + drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c | 188 +++++++++++------- 3 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
Vladimir Oltean
maintainerPATCH v3 1/7 spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Don't access reserved fields in SPI_MCR
From: Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]>
The SPI_MCR_PCSIS macro assumes that the controller has a number of chip select signals equal to 6. That is not always the case, but actually is described through the driver-specific "spi-num-chipselects" device tree binding. LS1028A for example only has 4 chip selects.
Don't write to the upper bits of the PCSIS field, which are reserved in the reference manual.
---
Changes in v3:
None.
Changes in v2:
Remove duplicate phrase in commit message.
drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c +5 -2
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@#define SPI_MCR 0x00#define SPI_MCR_MASTER BIT(31) -#define SPI_MCR_PCSIS (0x3F << 16) +#define SPI_MCR_PCSIS (x) ((x) << 16)#define SPI_MCR_CLR_TXF BIT(11)#define SPI_MCR_CLR_RXF BIT(10)#define SPI_MCR_XSPI BIT(3)
@@ -1197,7 +1197,10 @@ static const struct regmap_config dspi_xspi_regmap_config[] = {static void dspi_init (struct fsl_dspi *dspi) { -unsigned int mcr =SPI_MCR_PCSIS ; +unsigned int mcr; + +/* Set idle states for all chip select signals to high */ + mcr =SPI_MCR_PCSIS (GENMASK (dspi->ctlr->num_chipselect -1 ,0 ));if (dspi->devtype_data->trans_mode ==DSPI_XSPI_MODE ) mcr |=SPI_MCR_XSPI ;
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
Vladimir Oltean
maintainerPATCH v3 2/7 spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Avoid use-after-free in interrupt mode
In reply to Vladimir OlteanFrom: Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]>
When the wait_event_interruptible call fails, there is still a chance that the dspi_interrupt may arrive (for example the kernel thread doing the SPI pump really is interrupted).
In that case, dspi_transfer_one_message will return execution all the way to the spi_device driver, which may free the spi_message and spi_transfer structures.
But when the interrupt arrives, the driver still accesses those structures, leading to use-after-free issues as can be seen below:
hexdump -C /dev/mtd0
00000000 00 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
|.uhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * ^C[ 38.495955] fsl-dspi 2120000.spi: Waiting for transfer to complete failed! [ 38.503097] spi_master spi2: failed to transfer one message from queue [ 38.509729] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff800095ab3377 [ 38.517676] Mem abort info: [ 38.520474] ESR = 0x96000045 [ 38.523533] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 38.528861] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 38.531921] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 38.535067] Data abort info: [ 38.537952] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000045 [ 38.541797] CM = 0, WnR = 1 [ 38.544771] swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000082621000 [ 38.551494] [ffff800095ab3377] pgd=00000020fffff003, p4d=00000020fffff003, pud=0000000000000000 [ 38.560229] Internal error: Oops: 96000045 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 38.565819] Modules linked in: [ 38.568882] CPU: 0 PID: 2729 Comm: hexdump Not tainted 5.6.0-rc4-next-20200306-00052-gd8730cdc8a0b-dirty #193 [ 38.578834] Hardware name: Kontron SMARC-sAL28 (Single PHY) on SMARC Eval 2.0 carrier (DT) [ 38.587129] pstate: 20000085 (nzCv daIf -PAN -UAO) [ 38.591941] pc : ktime_get_real_ts64+0x3c/0x110 [ 38.596487] lr : spi_take_timestamp_pre+0x40/0x90 [ 38.601203] sp : ffff800010003d90 [ 38.604525] x29: ffff800010003d90 x28: ffff80001200e000 [ 38.609854] x27: ffff800011da9000 x26: ffff002079c40400 [ 38.615184] x25: ffff8000117fe018 x24: ffff800011daa1a0 [ 38.620513] x23: ffff800015ab3860 x22: ffff800095ab3377 [ 38.625841] x21: 000000000000146e x20: ffff8000120c3000 [ 38.631170] x19: ffff0020795f6e80 x18: ffff800011da9948 [ 38.636498] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 38.641826] x15: ffff800095ab3377 x14: 0720072007200720 [ 38.647155] x13: 0720072007200765 x12: 0775076507750771 [ 38.652483] x11: 0720076d076f0772 x10: 0000000000000040 [ 38.657812] x9 : ffff8000108e2100 x8 : ffff800011dcabe8 [ 38.663139] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff800015ab3a60 [ 38.668468] x5 : 0000000007200720 x4 : ffff800095ab3377 [ 38.673796] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000ab0 [ 38.679125] x1 : ffff800011daa000 x0 : 0000000000000026 [ 38.684454] Call trace: [ 38.686905] ktime_get_real_ts64+0x3c/0x110 [ 38.691100] spi_take_timestamp_pre+0x40/0x90 [ 38.695470] dspi_fifo_write+0x58/0x2c0 [ 38.699315] dspi_interrupt+0xbc/0xd0 [ 38.702987] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x78/0x2c0 [ 38.707706] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x3c/0x90 [ 38.712161] handle_irq_event+0x4c/0xd0 [ 38.716008] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xbc/0x170 [ 38.720115] generic_handle_irq+0x2c/0x40 [ 38.724135] __handle_domain_irq+0x68/0xc0 [ 38.728243] gic_handle_irq+0xc8/0x160 [ 38.732000] el1_irq+0xb8/0x180 [ 38.735149] spi_nor_spimem_read_data+0xe0/0x140 [ 38.739779] spi_nor_read+0xc4/0x120 [ 38.743364] mtd_read_oob+0xa8/0xc0 [ 38.746860] mtd_read+0x4c/0x80 [ 38.750007] mtdchar_read+0x108/0x2a0 [ 38.753679] __vfs_read+0x20/0x50 [ 38.757002] vfs_read+0xa4/0x190 [ 38.760237] ksys_read+0x6c/0xf0 [ 38.763471] __arm64_sys_read+0x20/0x30 [ 38.767319] el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0x90/0x160 [ 38.772125] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x90 [ 38.775449] el0_sync_handler+0x118/0x190 [ 38.779468] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 38.782793] Code: 91000294 1400000f d50339bf f9405e80 (f90002c0) [ 38.788910] ---[ end trace 55da560db4d6bef7 ]--- [ 38.793540] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt [ 38.799914] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs [ 38.803849] Kernel Offset: disabled [ 38.807344] CPU features: 0x10002,20006008 [ 38.811451] Memory Limit: none [ 38.814513] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt ]---
The solution is to mask interrupts when we know we can't deal with them. Also, to make sure they won't bite when we enable them back, we clear the status register such that stale interrupt requests will just be lost (as is expected on timeout or wait interruption).
---
Changes in v3:
Patch is new.
drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c +38 -25
@@ -911,15 +911,39 @@ static irqreturn_t dspi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)return IRQ_HANDLED ; } +static void dspi_enable_interrupts (struct fsl_dspi *dspi,bool on) +{ +u32 spi_rser =0 ; + +if (on) { +switch (dspi->devtype_data->trans_mode) { +case DSPI_EOQ_MODE : + spi_rser =SPI_RSER_EOQFE ; +break ; +case DSPI_XSPI_MODE : + spi_rser =SPI_RSER_CMDTCFE ; +break ; +default : +/* Interrupts not necessary for DMA mode */ +return ; + } + } + +regmap_write (dspi->regmap,SPI_SR ,SPI_SR_CLEAR ); +regmap_write (dspi->regmap,SPI_RSER , spi_rser); +} +static int dspi_transfer_one_message (struct spi_controller *ctlr,struct spi_message *message) {struct fsl_dspi *dspi =spi_controller_get_devdata (ctlr);struct spi_device *spi = message->spi; -enum dspi_trans_mode trans_mode;struct spi_transfer *transfer;int status =0 ; +if (dspi->irq) +dspi_enable_interrupts (dspi, true); + message->actual_length =0 ;list_for_each_entry (transfer, &message->transfers, transfer_list) {
@@ -965,37 +989,24 @@ static int dspi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_controller *ctlr,spi_take_timestamp_pre (dspi->ctlr, dspi->cur_transfer, dspi->progress, !dspi->irq); - trans_mode = dspi->devtype_data->trans_mode; -switch (trans_mode) { -case DSPI_EOQ_MODE : -regmap_write (dspi->regmap,SPI_RSER ,SPI_RSER_EOQFE ); -dspi_fifo_write (dspi); -break ; -case DSPI_XSPI_MODE : -regmap_write (dspi->regmap,SPI_RSER ,SPI_RSER_CMDTCFE ); -dspi_fifo_write (dspi); -break ; -case DSPI_DMA_MODE : +if (dspi->devtype_data->trans_mode ==DSPI_DMA_MODE ) {regmap_write (dspi->regmap,SPI_RSER ,SPI_RSER_TFFFE |SPI_RSER_TFFFD |SPI_RSER_RFDFE |SPI_RSER_RFDFD ); status =dspi_dma_xfer (dspi); -break ; -default : -dev_err (&dspi->pdev->dev,"unsupported trans_mode %u\n" , - trans_mode); - status = -EINVAL ; - goto out; - } +if (status) + goto out; + }else if (dspi->irq) { +/* Kick off the interrupt train */ +dspi_fifo_write (dspi); -if (!dspi->irq) { -do { - status =dspi_poll (dspi); - }while (status == -EINPROGRESS ); - }else if (trans_mode !=DSPI_DMA_MODE ) { status =wait_event_interruptible (dspi->waitq, dspi->waitflags); dspi->waitflags =0 ; + }else { +do { + status =dspi_poll (dspi); + }while (status == -EINPROGRESS ); }if (status) dev_err(&dspi->pdev->dev,
@@ -1005,6 +1016,9 @@ static int dspi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_controller *ctlr, } out: +if (dspi->irq) +dspi_enable_interrupts (dspi, false); + message->status = status;spi_finalize_current_message (ctlr);
@@ -1208,7 +1222,6 @@ static void dspi_init(struct fsl_dspi *dspi) mcr |=SPI_MCR_MASTER ;regmap_write (dspi->regmap,SPI_MCR , mcr); -regmap_write (dspi->regmap,SPI_SR ,SPI_SR_CLEAR ); }static int dspi_slave_abort (struct spi_master *master)
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
Vladimir Oltean
maintainerPATCH v3 3/7 spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Fix little endian access to PUSHR CMD and TXDATA
In reply to Vladimir OlteanFrom: Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]>
In XSPI mode, the 32-bit PUSHR register can be written to separately:
the higher 16 bits are for commands and the lower 16 bits are for data.
This has nicely been hacked around, by defining a second regmap with a width of 16 bits, and effectively splitting a 32-bit register into 2 16-bit ones, from the perspective of this regmap_pushr.
The problem is the assumption about the controller's endianness. If the controller is little endian (such as anything post-LS1046A), then the first 2 bytes, in the order imposed by memory layout, will actually hold the TXDATA, and the last 2 bytes will hold the CMD.
So take the controller's endianness into account when performing split writes to PUSHR. The obvious and simple solution would have been to call regmap_get_val_endian(), but that is an internal regmap function and we don't want to change regmap just for this. Therefore, we just re-read the "big-endian" device tree property.
---
Changes in v3:
None.
Changes in v2:
Parse "big-endian" device tree bindings instead of taking the decision based on compatible SoC.
drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c +20 -6
@@ -103,10 +103,6 @@#define SPI_FRAME_BITS (bits) SPI_CTAR_FMSZ((bits) - 1)#define SPI_FRAME_EBITS (bits) SPI_CTARE_FMSZE(((bits) - 1) >> 4) -/* Register offsets for regmap_pushr */ -#define PUSHR_CMD 0x0 -#define PUSHR_TX 0x2 -#define DMA_COMPLETION_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(3000)struct chip_data {
@@ -240,6 +236,13 @@ struct fsl_dspi {int words_in_flight; +/* +* Offsets for CMD and TXDATA within SPI_PUSHR when accessed +* individually (in XSPI mode) +*/ +int pushr_cmd; +int pushr_tx; +void (*host_to_dev)(struct fsl_dspi *dspi,u32 *txdata);void (*dev_to_host)(struct fsl_dspi *dspi,u32 rxdata); };
@@ -670,12 +673,12 @@ static void dspi_pushr_cmd_write(struct fsl_dspi *dspi, u16 cmd)*/ if (dspi->len > dspi->oper_word_size) cmd |=SPI_PUSHR_CMD_CONT ; -regmap_write (dspi->regmap_pushr,PUSHR_CMD , cmd); +regmap_write (dspi->regmap_pushr, dspi->pushr_cmd, cmd); }static void dspi_pushr_txdata_write (struct fsl_dspi *dspi,u16 txdata) { -regmap_write (dspi->regmap_pushr,PUSHR_TX , txdata); +regmap_write (dspi->regmap_pushr, dspi->pushr_tx, txdata); }static void dspi_xspi_write (struct fsl_dspi *dspi,int cnt,bool eoq)
@@ -1269,6 +1272,7 @@ static int dspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)struct fsl_dspi *dspi;struct resource *res;void __iomem *base; +bool big_endian; ctlr =spi_alloc_master (&pdev->dev,sizeof (struct fsl_dspi ));if (!ctlr)
@@ -1294,6 +1298,7 @@ static int dspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)/* Only Coldfire uses platform data */ dspi->devtype_data = &devtype_data[MCF5441X ]; + big_endian = true; }else { ret =of_property_read_u32 (np,"spi-num-chipselects" , &cs_num);
@@ -1315,6 +1320,15 @@ static int dspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ret = -EFAULT ; goto out_ctlr_put; } + + big_endian =of_device_is_big_endian (np); + } +if (big_endian) { + dspi->pushr_cmd =0 ; + dspi->pushr_tx =2 ; + }else { + dspi->pushr_cmd =2 ; + dspi->pushr_tx =0 ; }if (dspi->devtype_data->trans_mode ==DSPI_XSPI_MODE )
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
Vladimir Oltean
maintainerPATCH v3 4/7 spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Fix bits-per-word acceleration in DMA mode
In reply to Vladimir OlteanFrom: Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]>
In DMA mode, dspi_setup_accel does not get called, which results in the dspi->oper_word_size variable (which is used by dspi_dma_xfer) to not be initialized properly.
Because oper_word_size is zero, a few calculations end up being incorrect, and the DMA transfer eventually times out instead of sending anything on the wire.
Set up native transfers (or 8-on-16 acceleration) using dspi_setup_accel for DMA mode too.
Also take the opportunity and simplify the DMA buffer handling a little bit.
---
Changes in v3:
Pretty much re-did the patch. Before, dspi_setup_accel was called just once at the beginning of dspi_dma_xfer. Now it is called in the while loop. Everything else is just refactoring that follows along.
Changes in v2:
None.
drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c | 7 +++++-- drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c +42 -41
@@ -119,7 +119,6 @@ struct fsl_dspi_devtype_data {enum dspi_trans_mode trans_mode;u8 max_clock_factor;int fifo_size; -int dma_bufsize; };enum {
@@ -138,7 +137,6 @@ static const struct fsl_dspi_devtype_data devtype_data[] = { [VF610] = { .trans_mode = DSPI_DMA_MODE, .max_clock_factor = 2, - .dma_bufsize = 4096, .fifo_size = 4, }, [LS1021A] = {
@@ -167,19 +165,16 @@ static const struct fsl_dspi_devtype_data devtype_data[] = { }, [LS2080A] = { .trans_mode = DSPI_DMA_MODE, - .dma_bufsize = 8, .max_clock_factor = 8, .fifo_size = 4, }, [LS2085A] = { .trans_mode = DSPI_DMA_MODE, - .dma_bufsize = 8, .max_clock_factor = 8, .fifo_size = 4, }, [LX2160A] = { .trans_mode = DSPI_DMA_MODE, - .dma_bufsize = 8, .max_clock_factor = 8, .fifo_size = 4, },
@@ -191,9 +186,6 @@ static const struct fsl_dspi_devtype_data devtype_data[] = { };struct fsl_dspi_dma { -/* Length of transfer in words of dspi->fifo_size */ -u32 curr_xfer_len; -u32 *tx_dma_buf;struct dma_chan *chan_tx;dma_addr_t tx_dma_phys;
@@ -352,7 +344,7 @@ static void dspi_rx_dma_callback(void *arg)int i;if (dspi->rx) { -for (i =0 ; i < dma->curr_xfer_len; i++) +for (i =0 ; i < dspi->words_in_flight; i++)dspi_push_rx (dspi, dspi->dma->rx_dma_buf[i]); }
@@ -366,12 +358,12 @@ static int dspi_next_xfer_dma_submit(struct fsl_dspi *dspi)int time_left;int i; -for (i =0 ; i < dma->curr_xfer_len; i++) +for (i =0 ; i < dspi->words_in_flight; i++) dspi->dma->tx_dma_buf[i] =dspi_pop_tx_pushr (dspi); dma->tx_desc =dmaengine_prep_slave_single (dma->chan_tx, dma->tx_dma_phys, - dma->curr_xfer_len * + dspi->words_in_flight *DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES ,DMA_MEM_TO_DEV ,DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT |DMA_CTRL_ACK );
@@ -389,7 +381,7 @@ static int dspi_next_xfer_dma_submit(struct fsl_dspi *dspi) dma->rx_desc =dmaengine_prep_slave_single (dma->chan_rx, dma->rx_dma_phys, - dma->curr_xfer_len * + dspi->words_in_flight *DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES ,DMA_DEV_TO_MEM ,DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT |DMA_CTRL_ACK );
@@ -437,46 +429,56 @@ static int dspi_next_xfer_dma_submit(struct fsl_dspi *dspi)return 0 ; } +static void dspi_setup_accel (struct fsl_dspi *dspi); +static int dspi_dma_xfer (struct fsl_dspi *dspi) {struct spi_message *message = dspi->cur_msg;struct device *dev = &dspi->pdev->dev; -struct fsl_dspi_dma *dma = dspi->dma; -int curr_remaining_bytes; -int bytes_per_buffer; +int bytes_in_flight = dspi->len; +int chunk_size;int ret =0 ; - curr_remaining_bytes = dspi->len; - bytes_per_buffer = dspi->devtype_data->dma_bufsize / - dspi->devtype_data->fifo_size; -while (curr_remaining_bytes) { +/* +* dspi->len gets decremented by dspi_pop_tx_pushr in +* dspi_next_xfer_dma_submit +*/ +while (dspi->len) { +/* Figure out operational bits-per-word for this chunk */ +dspi_setup_accel (dspi); + +/* +* If the 16-bit TXDATA of the PUSHR is underutilized, then +* each DMA buffer will be able to hold only up to fifo_size +* useful bytes. +*/ +if (dspi->oper_word_size ==1 ) + chunk_size = dspi->devtype_data->fifo_size; +else + chunk_size = dspi->devtype_data->fifo_size *2 ; +/* Check if current transfer fits the DMA buffer */ - dma->curr_xfer_len = curr_remaining_bytes / - dspi->oper_word_size; -if (dma->curr_xfer_len > bytes_per_buffer) - dma->curr_xfer_len = bytes_per_buffer; + bytes_in_flight = dspi->len; +if (bytes_in_flight > chunk_size) + bytes_in_flight = chunk_size; + + dspi->words_in_flight = bytes_in_flight / dspi->oper_word_size; ret =dspi_next_xfer_dma_submit (dspi);if (ret) {dev_err (dev,"DMA transfer failed\n" ); - goto exit; - - }else { -const int len = dma->curr_xfer_len * - dspi->oper_word_size; - curr_remaining_bytes -= len; - message->actual_length += len; -if (curr_remaining_bytes <0 ) - curr_remaining_bytes =0 ; +break ; } + + message->actual_length += bytes_in_flight; } -exit:return ret; }static int dspi_request_dma (struct fsl_dspi *dspi,phys_addr_t phy_addr) { +int dma_bufsize = dspi->devtype_data->fifo_size *2 ;struct device *dev = &dspi->pdev->dev;struct dma_slave_config cfg;struct fsl_dspi_dma *dma;
@@ -500,14 +502,14 @@ static int dspi_request_dma(struct fsl_dspi *dspi, phys_addr_t phy_addr) goto err_tx_channel; } - dma->tx_dma_buf =dma_alloc_coherent (dev, dspi->devtype_data->dma_bufsize, + dma->tx_dma_buf =dma_alloc_coherent (dev, dma_bufsize, &dma->tx_dma_phys,GFP_KERNEL );if (!dma->tx_dma_buf) { ret = -ENOMEM ; goto err_tx_dma_buf; } - dma->rx_dma_buf =dma_alloc_coherent (dev, dspi->devtype_data->dma_bufsize, + dma->rx_dma_buf =dma_alloc_coherent (dev, dma_bufsize, &dma->rx_dma_phys,GFP_KERNEL );if (!dma->rx_dma_buf) { ret = -ENOMEM ;
@@ -544,10 +546,10 @@ static int dspi_request_dma(struct fsl_dspi *dspi, phys_addr_t phy_addr)return 0 ; err_slave_config: -dma_free_coherent (dev, dspi->devtype_data->dma_bufsize, +dma_free_coherent (dev, dma_bufsize, dma->rx_dma_buf, dma->rx_dma_phys); err_rx_dma_buf: -dma_free_coherent (dev, dspi->devtype_data->dma_bufsize, +dma_free_coherent (dev, dma_bufsize, dma->tx_dma_buf, dma->tx_dma_phys); err_tx_dma_buf:dma_release_channel (dma->chan_tx);
@@ -562,6 +564,7 @@ static int dspi_request_dma(struct fsl_dspi *dspi, phys_addr_t phy_addr)static void dspi_release_dma (struct fsl_dspi *dspi) { +int dma_bufsize = dspi->devtype_data->fifo_size *2 ;struct fsl_dspi_dma *dma = dspi->dma;struct device *dev = &dspi->pdev->dev;
@@ -570,15 +573,13 @@ static void dspi_release_dma(struct fsl_dspi *dspi)if (dma->chan_tx) {dma_unmap_single (dev, dma->tx_dma_phys, - dspi->devtype_data->dma_bufsize, -DMA_TO_DEVICE ); + dma_bufsize,DMA_TO_DEVICE );dma_release_channel (dma->chan_tx); }if (dma->chan_rx) {dma_unmap_single (dev, dma->rx_dma_phys, - dspi->devtype_data->dma_bufsize, -DMA_FROM_DEVICE ); + dma_bufsize,DMA_FROM_DEVICE );dma_release_channel (dma->chan_rx); } }
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
Vladimir Oltean
maintainerPATCH v3 5/7 spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Add support for LS1028A
In reply to Vladimir OlteanFrom: Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]>
This is similar to the DSPI instantiation on LS1028A, except that:
- The A-011218 erratum has been fixed, so DMA works
- The endianness is different, which has implications on XSPI mode
Some benchmarking with the following command:
spidev_test --device /dev/spidev2.0 --bpw 8 --size 256 --cpha --iter 10000000 --speed 20000000
shows that in DMA mode, it can achieve around 2400 kbps, and in XSPI mode, the same command goes up to 4700 kbps. This is somewhat to be expected, since the DMA buffer size is extremely small at 8 bytes, the winner becomes whomever can prepare the buffers for transmission quicker, and DMA mode has higher overhead there. So XSPI FIFO mode has been chosen as the operating mode for this chip.
---
Changes in v3:
Removed the dma_bufsize variable (obsoleted by 4/7).
Changes in v2:
Switch to DSPI_XSPI_MODE.
drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c +9 -0
@@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ struct fsl_dspi_devtype_data {enum {LS1021A ,LS1012A , +LS1028A ,LS1043A ,LS1046A ,LS2080A ,
@@ -151,6 +152,11 @@ static const struct fsl_dspi_devtype_data devtype_data[] = { .max_clock_factor = 8, .fifo_size = 16, }, + [LS1028A] = { + .trans_mode = DSPI_XSPI_MODE, + .max_clock_factor = 8, + .fifo_size = 4, + }, [LS1043A] = {/* Has A-011218 DMA erratum */ .trans_mode = DSPI_XSPI_MODE,
@@ -1112,6 +1118,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id fsl_dspi_dt_ids[] = { }, { .compatible = "fsl,ls1012a-dspi", .data = &devtype_data[LS1012A], + }, { + .compatible = "fsl,ls1028a-dspi", + .data = &devtype_data[LS1028A], }, { .compatible = "fsl,ls1043a-dspi", .data = &devtype_data[LS1043A],
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
Vladimir Oltean
maintainerPATCH v3 6/7 arm64: dts: ls1028a: Specify the DMA channels for the DSPI controllers
In reply to Vladimir OlteanFrom: Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]>
LS1028A has a functional connection to the eDMA module. Even if the spi-fsl-dspi.c driver is not using DMA for LS1028A now, define the slots in the DMAMUX for connecting the eDMA channels to the 3 DSPI controllers.
---
Changes in v3:
None.
Changes in v2:
None.
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi +6 -0
@@ -298,6 +298,8 @@ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 26 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; clock-names = "dspi"; clocks = <&clockgen 4 1>; + dmas = <&edma0 0 62>, <&edma0 0 60>; + dma-names = "tx", "rx"; spi-num-chipselects = <4>; little-endian; status = "disabled";
@@ -311,6 +313,8 @@ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 26 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; clock-names = "dspi"; clocks = <&clockgen 4 1>; + dmas = <&edma0 0 58>, <&edma0 0 56>; + dma-names = "tx", "rx"; spi-num-chipselects = <4>; little-endian; status = "disabled";
@@ -324,6 +328,8 @@ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 26 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; clock-names = "dspi"; clocks = <&clockgen 4 1>; + dmas = <&edma0 0 54>, <&edma0 0 2>; + dma-names = "tx", "rx"; spi-num-chipselects = <3>; little-endian; status = "disabled";
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
Vladimir Oltean
maintainerPATCH v3 7/7 arm64: dts: ls1028a-rdb: Add a spidev node for the mikroBUS
In reply to Vladimir OlteanFrom: Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]>
For debugging, it is useful to have access to the DSPI controller signals. On the reference design board, these are exported to either the mikroBUS1 or mikroBUS2 connector (according to the CPLD register BRDCFG3[SPI3]).
---
Changes in v3:
None.
Changes in v2:
Change compatible string for spidev node.
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts +14 -0
@@ -83,6 +83,20 @@ }; }; +&dspi2 { + bus-num = <2>; + status = "okay"; + + /* mikroBUS1 */ + spidev@0 { + compatible = "rohm,dh2228fv"; + spi-max-frequency = <20000000>; + fsl,spi-cs-sck-delay = <100>; + fsl,spi-sck-cs-delay = <100>; + reg = <0>; + }; +}; + &esdhc { sd-uhs-sdr104; sd-uhs-sdr50;
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
Hi Vladimir,
Am 2020-03-10 13:55, schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
Quoted 17 lines
From: Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]>
This series addresses a few issues that were missed during the previous series "[PATCH 00/12] TCFQ to XSPI migration for NXP DSPI driver", on SoCs other than LS1021A and LS1043A. DMA mode has been completely broken by that series, and XSPI mode never worked on little-endian controllers.
Then it introduces support for the LS1028A chip, whose compatible has recently been documented here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/[email protected]/
The device tree for the LS1028A SoC is extended with DMA channels definition, such that even though the default operating mode is XSPI, one can simply change
DSPI_XSPI_MODEtoDSPI_DMA_MODEin thedevtype_datastructure of the driver and use that instead.
Quoted 5 lines
I don't expect the "fixes" patches to reach very far down the stable pipe, since there has been pretty heavy refactoring in this driver.
For testing, benchmarking and debugging, the mikroBUS connector on the LS1028A-RDB is made available via spidev.
XSPI mode, while now I cannot reproduce the kernel oops anymore, I've found two other problems (1), (2). Which are likely the same underlying problem. DMA mode works "better" now, still one problem (3).
(1) It seems like the first write/read/erase after the aborted instruction don't get through:
# hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * [ 627.914654] fsl-dspi 2120000.spi: Waiting for transfer to complete failed! ^C[ 627.921649] spi_master spi1: failed to transfer one message from queue
#
# echo huhu > /dev/mtd0 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * hexdump: /dev/mtd0: Input/output error 003df000 # echo huhu > /dev/mtd0 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * [ 642.738905] fsl-dspi 2120000.spi: Waiting for transfer to complete failed! ^C[ 642.745832] spi_master spi1: failed to transfer one message from queue # # flash_erase /dev/mtd0 0 1 Erasing 4 Kibyte @ 0 -- 100 % complete # # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * hexdump: /dev/mtd0: Input/output error 0023d000 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| *
(2) Also, reading the flash, every second time there is (reproducibly) an IO error:
# hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * 01000000 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * hexdump: /dev/mtd0: Input/output error 00dc0000 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * 01000000 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * hexdump: /dev/mtd0: Input/output error 00e6a000
(3) Depening on the content length there is also an IO error. Funny enough, the content is still written to the SPI flash.
# echo -n 1 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 12 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 123 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 1234 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 12345 > /dev/mtd10 sh: write error: Input/output error # echo -n 123456 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 1234567 > /dev/mtd10 sh: write error: Input/output error # echo -n 12345678 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 123456789 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 1234567890 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 12345678901 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 123456789012 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 1234567890123 > /dev/mtd10 sh: write error: Input/output error # echo -n 12345678901234 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 123456789012345 > /dev/mtd10 sh: write error: Input/output error # echo -n 1234567890123456 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 12345678901234567 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 123456789012345678 > /dev/mtd10
# flash_erase /dev/mtd10 0 1 Erasing 4 Kibyte @ 0 -- 100 % complete # hexdump -C /dev/mtd10 00000000 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * ^C # echo -n 12345 > /dev/mtd10 sh: write error: Input/output error # hexdump -C /dev/mtd10 00000000 31 32 33 34 35 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |12345...........| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * ^C
-michael
Quoted 15 lines
Vladimir Oltean (7):
spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Don't access reserved fields inSPI_MCR
spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Avoid use-after-free in interrupt mode
spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Fix little endian access to PUSHR CMD and TXDATA
spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Fix bits-per-word acceleration in DMA mode
spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Add support for LS1028A
arm64: dts: ls1028a: Specify the DMA channels for the DSPI
controllers
arm64: dts: ls1028a-rdb: Add a spidev node for the mikroBUS.../boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts | 14 ++ .../arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi | 6 + drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c | 188 +++++++++++------- 3 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
Vladimir Oltean
maintainerHi Michael,
Quoted 86 lines · Michael Walle
XSPI mode, while now I cannot reproduce the kernel oops anymore, I've found two
other problems (1), (2). Which are likely the same underlying problem. DMA mode
works "better" now, still one problem (3).(1) It seems like the first write/read/erase after the aborted instruction
don't get through:# hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * [ 627.914654] fsl-dspi 2120000.spi: Waiting for transfer to complete failed! ^C[ 627.921649] spi_master spi1: failed to transfer one message from queue#
# echo huhu > /dev/mtd0 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * hexdump: /dev/mtd0: Input/output error 003df000 # echo huhu > /dev/mtd0 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * [ 642.738905] fsl-dspi 2120000.spi: Waiting for transfer to complete failed! ^C[ 642.745832] spi_master spi1: failed to transfer one message from queue # # flash_erase /dev/mtd0 0 1 Erasing 4 Kibyte @ 0 -- 100 % complete # # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * hexdump: /dev/mtd0: Input/output error 0023d000 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| *(2) Also, reading the flash, every second time there is (reproducibly) an
IO error:# hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * 01000000 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * hexdump: /dev/mtd0: Input/output error 00dc0000 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * 01000000
Quoted 9 lines
# hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * hexdump: /dev/mtd0: Input/output error 00e6a000
Just to be clear, issue 2 is seen only after you abort another transaction, right?
Quoted 28 lines
(3) Depening on the content length there is also an IO error. Funny enough,
the content is still written to the SPI flash.# echo -n 1 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 12 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 123 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 1234 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 12345 > /dev/mtd10 sh: write error: Input/output error # echo -n 123456 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 1234567 > /dev/mtd10 sh: write error: Input/output error # echo -n 12345678 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 123456789 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 1234567890 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 12345678901 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 123456789012 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 1234567890123 > /dev/mtd10 sh: write error: Input/output error # echo -n 12345678901234 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 123456789012345 > /dev/mtd10 sh: write error: Input/output error # echo -n 1234567890123456 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 12345678901234567 > /dev/mtd10 # echo -n 123456789012345678 > /dev/mtd10
Quoted 17 lines
# flash_erase /dev/mtd10 0 1 Erasing 4 Kibyte @ 0 -- 100 % complete # hexdump -C /dev/mtd10 00000000 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * ^C # echo -n 12345 > /dev/mtd10 sh: write error: Input/output error # hexdump -C /dev/mtd10 00000000 31 32 33 34 35 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |12345...........| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * ^C
For this one, I think the reported message->actual_length is incorrect in dspi_dma_xfer, which makes spi-mem scream.
Quoted 18 lines
-michael
Quoted 15 lines
Vladimir Oltean (7):
spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Don't access reserved fields inSPI_MCR
spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Avoid use-after-free in interrupt mode
spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Fix little endian access to PUSHR CMD and TXDATA
spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Fix bits-per-word acceleration in DMA mode
spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Add support for LS1028A
arm64: dts: ls1028a: Specify the DMA channels for the DSPI
controllers
arm64: dts: ls1028a-rdb: Add a spidev node for the mikroBUS.../boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts | 14 ++ .../arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi | 6 + drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c | 188 +++++++++++------- 3 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
Thanks,
-Vladimir
Hi Vladimir,
Am 2020-03-10 15:56, schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
Quoted 36 lines
Quoted 26 lines
(2) Also, reading the flash, every second time there is (reproducibly) an
IO error:# hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * 01000000 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * hexdump: /dev/mtd0: Input/output error 00dc0000 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * 01000000Quoted 9 lines
# hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * hexdump: /dev/mtd0: Input/output error 00e6a000
Quoted 2 lines
Just to be clear, issue 2 is seen only after you abort another transaction, right?
No, just normal uninterrupted reading. Just tried it right after reboot. Doesn't seem to be every second time though, just random which makes me wonder if that is another problem now. Also the last successful reading is random.
buildroot login: root
# hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 31 32 33 34 35 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |12345...........| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * [ 32.359156] random: crng init done 01000000 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 31 32 33 34 35 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |12345...........| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * 01000000 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 31 32 33 34 35 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |12345...........| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * hexdump: /dev/mtd0: Input/output error 00166000 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 31 32 33 34 35 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |12345...........| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * hexdump: /dev/mtd0: Input/output error 00c68000 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 31 32 33 34 35 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |12345...........| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * hexdump: /dev/mtd0: Input/output error 00243000 #
-michael
Am 2020-03-10 16:22, schrieb Michael Walle:
Quoted 39 lines
Hi Vladimir,
Am 2020-03-10 15:56, schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
Quoted 36 lines
Quoted 35 lines
(2) Also, reading the flash, every second time there is (reproducibly) an
IO error:# hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * 01000000 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * hexdump: /dev/mtd0: Input/output error 00dc0000 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * 01000000 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * hexdump: /dev/mtd0: Input/output error 00e6a000
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Just to be clear, issue 2 is seen only after you abort another transaction, right?
No, just normal uninterrupted reading. Just tried it right after reboot. Doesn't seem to be every second time though, just random which makes me wonder if that is another problem now. Also the last successful reading is random.
Ok I guess I know what the root cause is. This is an extract of the current code:
Quoted 14 lines
static int dspi_transfer_one_message(struct
spi_controller*ctlr,
structspi_message*message)
{
../* Kick off the interrupt train */ dspi_fifo_write(dspi); status = wait_event_interruptible(dspi->waitq, dspi->waitflags); dspi->waitflags = 0;..
}static int
dspi_rxtx(struct fsl_dspi *dspi)
Quoted 11 lines
{
dspi_fifo_read(dspi);
if (!dspi->len)
/* Success! */
return 0;
dspi_fifo_write(dspi);
return -EINPROGRESS;
}dspi_rxtx() is used in the ISR. Both dspi_fifo_write() and dspi_rxtx() access shared data like, dspi->words_in_flight. In the EIO error case the following bytes_sent is -1, because dspi->words_in_flight is -1.
Quoted 2 lines
/* Update total number of bytes that were transferred */
bytes_sent=dspi->words_in_flight*dspi->oper_word_size;
words_in_flight is always -1 after dspi_fifo_read() was called. In the error case, the ISR kicks in right in the middle of the execution of dspi_fifo_write() in dspi_transfer_one_message().
Quoted 7 lines
static void
dspi_fifo_write(struct fsl_dspi *dspi){
..if (dspi->devtype_data->trans_mode == DSPI_EOQ_MODE) dspi_eoq_fifo_write(dspi); else dspi_xspi_fifo_write(dspi);
Now if the ISR is executed right here..
Quoted 3 lines
/* Update total number of bytes that were transferred */ bytes_sent = dspi->words_in_flight * dspi->oper_word_size;
.. words_in_flight might be -1.
Quoted 1 line
msg->actual_length += bytes_sent;
and bytes_sent is negative. And this causes an IO error because the returned overall message length doesn't match.
Quoted 3 lines
dspi->progress += bytes_sent / DIV_ROUND_UP(xfer->bits_per_word, 8);..
}
I could not reproduce the issue with the following patch. I don't know if I got the locking correct though or if there is a better way to go.
drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c +12 -1
@@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ struct fsl_dspi {u16 tx_cmd;const struct fsl_dspi_devtype_data *devtype_data; +spinlock_t lock;wait_queue_head_t waitq;u32 waitflags;
@@ -873,14 +874,20 @@ static void dspi_fifo_write(struct fsl_dspi *dspi)static int dspi_rxtx (struct fsl_dspi *dspi) { +unsigned long flags; + +spin_lock_irqsave (&dspi->lock, flags);dspi_fifo_read (dspi); -if (!dspi->len) +if (!dspi->len) {/* Success! */ +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&dspi->lock, flags);return 0 ; + }dspi_fifo_write (dspi); +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&dspi->lock, flags);return -EINPROGRESS ; }
@@ -950,7 +957,9 @@ static int dspi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_controller *ctlr,struct fsl_dspi *dspi =spi_controller_get_devdata (ctlr);struct spi_device *spi = message->spi;struct spi_transfer *transfer; +unsigned long flags;int status =0 ; +int i =0 ;if (dspi->irq)dspi_enable_interrupts (dspi, true);
@@ -1009,7 +1018,9 @@ static int dspi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_controller *ctlr, goto out; }else if (dspi->irq) {/* Kick off the interrupt train */ +spin_lock_irqsave (&dspi->lock, flags);dspi_fifo_write (dspi); +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&dspi->lock, flags); status = wait_event_interruptible(dspi->waitq,
dspi->waitflags);
@@ -1301,6 +1312,7 @@ static int dspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ctlr->cleanup = dspi_cleanup;
ctlr->slave_abort = dspi_slave_abort;
ctlr->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA | SPI_LSB_FIRST;+ spin_lock_init(&dspi->lock);
pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
if (pdata) {-michael
Vladimir Oltean
maintainerHi Michael,
Quoted 190 lines · Michael Walle
Am 2020-03-10 16:22, schrieb Michael Walle:
Quoted 40 lines
Hi Vladimir,
Am 2020-03-10 15:56, schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
Quoted 37 lines
Quoted 36 lines
(2) Also, reading the flash, every second time there is (reproducibly)
an
IO error:# hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * 01000000 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * hexdump: /dev/mtd0: Input/output error 00dc0000 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * 01000000 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * hexdump: /dev/mtd0: Input/output error 00e6a000Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Just to be clear, issue 2 is seen only after you abort another transaction, right?
No, just normal uninterrupted reading. Just tried it right after reboot. Doesn't seem to be every second time though, just random which makes me wonder if that is another problem now. Also the last successful reading is random.
Ok I guess I know what the root cause is. This is an extract of the current code:
Quoted 14 lines
static int dspi_transfer_one_message(struct
spi_controller*ctlr,
structspi_message*message)
{
../* Kick off the interrupt train */ dspi_fifo_write(dspi); status = wait_event_interruptible(dspi->waitq, dspi->waitflags); dspi->waitflags = 0;..
}static int
dspi_rxtx(struct fsl_dspi *dspi)Quoted 11 lines
{ dspi_fifo_read(dspi); if (!dspi->len) /* Success! */ return 0; dspi_fifo_write(dspi); return -EINPROGRESS; }
dspi_rxtx()is used in the ISR. Bothdspi_fifo_write()anddspi_rxtx()access shared data like,dspi->words_in_flight. In the EIO error case the followingbytes_sentis -1, becausedspi->words_in_flightis -1.Quoted 2 lines
/* Update total number of bytes that were transferred */
bytes_sent=dspi->words_in_flight*dspi->oper_word_size;
words_in_flightis always -1 afterdspi_fifo_read()was called. In the error case, the ISR kicks in right in the middle of the execution ofdspi_fifo_write()indspi_transfer_one_message().Quoted 7 lines
static void
dspi_fifo_write(struct fsl_dspi *dspi){
..if (dspi->devtype_data->trans_mode == DSPI_EOQ_MODE) dspi_eoq_fifo_write(dspi); else dspi_xspi_fifo_write(dspi);Now if the ISR is executed right here..
Quoted 3 lines
/* Update total number of bytes that were transferred */ bytes_sent = dspi->words_in_flight * dspi->oper_word_size;..
words_in_flightmight be -1.Quoted 1 line
msg->actual_length += bytes_sent;and
bytes_sentis negative. And this causes an IO error because the returned overall message length doesn't match.Quoted 3 lines
dspi->progress += bytes_sent / DIV_ROUND_UP(xfer->bits_per_word, 8);..
}I could not reproduce the issue with the following patch. I don't know if I got the locking correct though or if there is a better way to go.
drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c +10
-1@@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ struct fsl_dspi {u16 tx_cmd;const struct fsl_dspi_devtype_data *devtype_data; +spinlock_t lock;wait_queue_head_t waitq;u32 waitflags;@@ -873,14 +874,20 @@ static void dspi_fifo_write(struct fsl_dspi *dspi)static int dspi_rxtx (struct fsl_dspi *dspi) { +unsigned long flags; + +spin_lock_irqsave (&dspi->lock, flags);dspi_fifo_read (dspi); -if (!dspi->len) +if (!dspi->len) {/* Success! */ +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&dspi->lock, flags);return 0 ; + }dspi_fifo_write (dspi); +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&dspi->lock, flags);return -EINPROGRESS ; }@@ -950,7 +957,9 @@ static int dspi_transfer_one_message(structspi_controller *ctlr, struct fsl_dspi *dspi = spi_controller_get_devdata(ctlr);struct spi_device *spi = message->spi;struct spi_transfer *transfer; +unsigned long flags;int status =0 ; +int i =0 ;if (dspi->irq)dspi_enable_interrupts(dspi, true);drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c +2
-0@@ -1009,7 +1018,9 @@ static int dspi_transfer_one_message(structspi_controller *ctlr, goto out; }else if (dspi->irq) {/* Kick off the interrupt train */ +spin_lock_irqsave (&dspi->lock, flags);dspi_fifo_write (dspi); +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&dspi->lock, flags); status = wait_event_interruptible(dspi->waitq,
dspi->waitflags);drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c +1
-0@@ -1301,6 +1312,7 @@ static int dspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ctlr->cleanup = dspi_cleanup; ctlr->slave_abort = dspi_slave_abort; ctlr->mode_bits =SPI_CPOL |SPI_CPHA |SPI_LSB_FIRST ; +spin_lock_init (&dspi->lock); pdata =dev_get_platdata (&pdev->dev);if (pdata) {
Quoted 1 line
-michael
Thanks for taking such a close look. I haven't had the time to follow up. Indeed, the ISR, and therefore dspi_fifo_read, can execute before dspi->words_in_flight was populated correctly. And bad things will happen in that case.
But I wouldn't introduce a spin lock that disables interrupts on the local CPU just for that - it's too complicated for this driver. I would just keep the SPI interrupt quiesced via SPI_RSER and enable it only once it's safe, aka after updating dspi->words_in_flight.
Thanks,
-Vladimir
Am 2020-03-13 17:37, schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
Quoted 195 lines
Hi Michael,
Quoted 192 lines · Michael Walle
Am 2020-03-10 16:22, schrieb Michael Walle:
Quoted 40 lines
Hi Vladimir,
Am 2020-03-10 15:56, schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
Quoted 37 lines
Quoted 36 lines
(2) Also, reading the flash, every second time there is (reproducibly)
an
IO error:# hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * 01000000 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * hexdump: /dev/mtd0: Input/output error 00dc0000 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * 01000000 # hexdump -C /dev/mtd0 00000000 68 75 68 75 0a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |huhu............| 00000010 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff |................| * hexdump: /dev/mtd0: Input/output error 00e6a000Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Just to be clear, issue 2 is seen only after you abort another transaction, right?
No, just normal uninterrupted reading. Just tried it right after reboot. Doesn't seem to be every second time though, just random which makes me wonder if that is another problem now. Also the last successful reading is random.
Ok I guess I know what the root cause is. This is an extract of the current code:
Quoted 14 lines
static int dspi_transfer_one_message(struct
spi_controller*ctlr,
structspi_message*message)
{
../* Kick off the interrupt train */ dspi_fifo_write(dspi); status = wait_event_interruptible(dspi->waitq, dspi->waitflags); dspi->waitflags = 0;..
}static int
dspi_rxtx(struct fsl_dspi *dspi)Quoted 11 lines
{ dspi_fifo_read(dspi); if (!dspi->len) /* Success! */ return 0; dspi_fifo_write(dspi); return -EINPROGRESS; }
dspi_rxtx()is used in the ISR. Bothdspi_fifo_write()anddspi_rxtx()access shared data like,dspi->words_in_flight. In the EIO error case the followingbytes_sentis -1, becausedspi->words_in_flightis -1.Quoted 2 lines
/* Update total number of bytes that were transferred */
bytes_sent=dspi->words_in_flight*dspi->oper_word_size;
words_in_flightis always -1 afterdspi_fifo_read()was called. In the error case, the ISR kicks in right in the middle of the execution ofdspi_fifo_write()indspi_transfer_one_message().Quoted 7 lines
static void
dspi_fifo_write(struct fsl_dspi *dspi){
..if (dspi->devtype_data->trans_mode == DSPI_EOQ_MODE) dspi_eoq_fifo_write(dspi); else dspi_xspi_fifo_write(dspi);Now if the ISR is executed right here..
Quoted 3 lines
/* Update total number of bytes that were transferred */ bytes_sent = dspi->words_in_flight * dspi->oper_word_size;..
words_in_flightmight be -1.Quoted 1 line
msg->actual_length += bytes_sent;and
bytes_sentis negative. And this causes an IO error because the returned overall message length doesn't match.Quoted 3 lines
dspi->progress += bytes_sent / DIV_ROUND_UP(xfer->bits_per_word, 8);..
}I could not reproduce the issue with the following patch. I don't know if I got the locking correct though or if there is a better way to go.
drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c +10
-1@@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ struct fsl_dspi {u16 tx_cmd;const struct fsl_dspi_devtype_data *devtype_data; +spinlock_t lock;wait_queue_head_t waitq;u32 waitflags;@@ -873,14 +874,20 @@ static void dspi_fifo_write(struct fsl_dspi *dspi)static int dspi_rxtx (struct fsl_dspi *dspi) { +unsigned long flags; + +spin_lock_irqsave (&dspi->lock, flags);dspi_fifo_read (dspi); -if (!dspi->len) +if (!dspi->len) {/* Success! */ +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&dspi->lock, flags);return 0 ; + }dspi_fifo_write (dspi); +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&dspi->lock, flags);return -EINPROGRESS ; }@@ -950,7 +957,9 @@ static int dspi_transfer_one_message(structspi_controller *ctlr, struct fsl_dspi *dspi = spi_controller_get_devdata(ctlr);struct spi_device *spi = message->spi;struct spi_transfer *transfer; +unsigned long flags;int status =0 ; +int i =0 ;if (dspi->irq)dspi_enable_interrupts(dspi, true);drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c +2
-0@@ -1009,7 +1018,9 @@ static int dspi_transfer_one_message(structspi_controller *ctlr, goto out; }else if (dspi->irq) {/* Kick off the interrupt train */ +spin_lock_irqsave (&dspi->lock, flags);dspi_fifo_write (dspi); +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&dspi->lock, flags); status =wait_event_interruptible(dspi->waitq,
dspi->waitflags);drivers/spi/spi-fsl-dspi.c +1
-0@@ -1301,6 +1312,7 @@ static int dspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ctlr->cleanup = dspi_cleanup; ctlr->slave_abort = dspi_slave_abort; ctlr->mode_bits =SPI_CPOL |SPI_CPHA |SPI_LSB_FIRST ; +spin_lock_init (&dspi->lock); pdata =dev_get_platdata (&pdev->dev);if (pdata) {
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
-michael
Thanks for taking such a close look. I haven't had the time to follow up. Indeed, the ISR, and therefore
dspi_fifo_read, can execute beforedspi->words_in_flightwas populated correctly. And bad things will happen in that case.
But I wouldn't introduce a spin lock that disables interrupts on the local CPU just for that - it's too complicated for this driver.
Sure. It was just a quick test whether the problem actually goes away.
Quoted 2 lines
I would just keep the SPI interrupt quiesced via
SPI_RSERand enable it only once it's safe, aka after updatingdspi->words_in_flight.
I didn't want to move the interrupt_enable() around. I leave this up to you ;)
-michael