Kill(2) and pthread_create(2) interact poorly in 5.4.28-rt19
Subsystems (3)
Kill(2) and pthread_create(2) interact poorly in 5.4.28-rt19.
The following kernel splat can be made to occur when running the attached test program:
virt_to_cache: Object is not a Slab page!
...
Call Trace:
free_uid+0x93/0xa0
__dequeue_signal+0x21c/0x230
dequeue_signal+0xb7/0x1b0
get_signal+0x266/0xce0
do_signal+0x36/0x640This was discovered on 5.4.28-rt19. That kernel was compiled nort, with preemption, and with lots of debug options selected. Subsequent tests on the following kernels show:
5.4.26-rt17 passes
5.4.28-rt18 fails
5.4.28-rt19 fails
5.4.34-rt21 fails
5.6.4-rt3 passesThe attached test, tb.c, does a pthread_create-n-join in a continuous loop, while from other threads in the process group, SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 are continually being sent to the process group.
When I revert this rt patch in 5.4.28-rt19,
signals-allow-rt-tasks-to-cache-one-sigqueue-struct.patch
the kernel cannot be made to fail. However, since two of the above kernels pass without removing this patch, I do not believe that removing it will address whatever the root cause is.
Normally, it takes five or six runs for the test to oops the kernel. For some reason, when I run it as:
sudo chrt -f 1 taskset 2 ./tb
it fails, if it is going to fail, on first try.
once I get a splat the system keeps on running. But I find I must reboot to be able to get another splat.
Regards,
Joe
/*
* Test interaction between pthread_create(2) and kill(2). *
* Algorithm: In a loop, as fast as possible, create
* and wait on a NOP thread. While doing so, from other
* threads, send SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 to the process group
* as fast as possible. All threads except for the targeted
* test thread are blocked from receiving SIGUSR[12]. *
* This test runs for one second. It is known to generate
* a kernel splat on 5.4.28-rt19 when compiled preempt,
* nort, and with lots of debug options selected. Fails at
* most once per boot. Test may have to be run several
* times times before failure. The below seems to trigger
* the problem more easily:
*
* chrt -f 1 taskset 2 ./tb
*
* This program is a revamp/simplification of the LTP test
* pthread_create/14-1.c.
*
* Signed-off-by: Joe Korty <[email protected]> */
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <semaphore.h>
#include <pthread.h>
sigset_t usersigs;
sem_t semsig1;sem_t semsig2;
volatile int doit = 1;
volatile unsigned long threaded_count, siguser1_count, siguser2_count;
/* thread to send SIGUSR1 serially to this process as fast as possible */ void *sendsig1(void *arg)
{
pid_t pid = getpid();
pthread_sigmask(SIG_BLOCK, &usersigs, NULL);
while (doit) {
siguser1_count++;
sem_wait(&semsig1);
kill(pid, SIGUSR1);
}
return NULL;
}/* SIGUSR1 handler merely lets the sender know it can send another signal */ void siguser1(int sig)
{
sem_post(&semsig1);
}/* thread to send SIGUSR2 serially to this process as fast as possible */ void *sendsig2(void *arg)
{
pid_t pid = getpid();
pthread_sigmask(SIG_BLOCK, &usersigs, NULL);
while (doit) {
siguser2_count++;
sem_wait(&semsig2);
kill(pid, SIGUSR2);
}
return NULL;
}void siguser2(int sig)
{
sem_post(&semsig2);
}/* dummy thread, does no work */
void *threaded(void *arg)
{
return NULL;
}void *test(void *arg)
{
pthread_t child_id;
/* expose this thread & its children to SIGUSR[12] */
pthread_sigmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, &usersigs, NULL);
/* create and re-create a thread as fast as possible */
while (doit) {
threaded_count++;
pthread_create(&child_id, NULL, threaded, NULL);
pthread_join(child_id, NULL);
}
return NULL;
}int main(void)
{
pthread_t th_work, th_sig1, th_sig2;
struct sigaction sa;
sigemptyset(&sa.sa_mask);
sa.sa_flags = 0;
sa.sa_handler = siguser1;
sigaction(SIGUSR1, &sa, NULL);
sa.sa_handler = siguser2;
sigaction(SIGUSR2, &sa, NULL);
/* block the main thread from seeing SIGUSR[12] */
sigemptyset(&usersigs);
sigaddset(&usersigs, SIGUSR1);
sigaddset(&usersigs, SIGUSR2);
pthread_sigmask(SIG_BLOCK, &usersigs, NULL);
sem_init(&semsig1, 0, 1);
sem_init(&semsig2, 0, 1);
pthread_create(&th_work, NULL, test, NULL);
pthread_create(&th_sig1, NULL, sendsig1, NULL);
pthread_create(&th_sig2, NULL, sendsig2, NULL);
sleep(1);
doit = 0;
pthread_join(th_sig1, NULL);
pthread_join(th_sig2, NULL);
pthread_join(th_work, NULL);
printf("#threads %lu, #sigusr1's %lu, #sigusr2's %lu\n",
threaded_count, siguser1_count, siguser2_count);
return 0;
}PATCH 1/1 signals: Allow tasks to cache one sigqueue struct, version 2
[5.4.28-rt19] Cache up to one sigqueue per task.
This replaces an earlier version of this rt patch,
signals-allow-rt-tasks-to-cache-one-sigqueue-struct.patch
which is able to generate a kernel splat of the form,
virt_to_cache: Object is not a Slab page!
...
Call Trace:
free_uid+0x93/0xa0
__dequeue_signal+0x21c/0x230
dequeue_signal+0xb7/0x1b0
get_signal+0x266/0xce0
do_signal+0x36/0x640This most easily happens when the test program, tb.c, is executed. That test program can be found in an earlier linux-rt-users posting,
Kill(2) and pthread_create(2) interact poorly in 5.4.28-rt19
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:45:36 -0400
After poking around the original patch, not making any progress, I tried revamping the patch down to its simpliest possible implementation. This revamped version has been tested in both an rt and nort compiled 5.4.28-rt19 kernel. No issues have been seen so far.
Please consider
1) dropping the original cache-sigqueue patch, or
2) replace that patch with this new version, or
3) rewrite the original patch using your own criteria for what a correct patch should be.
and backport whatever fix is selected to all versions of the rt kernel that have the original patch applied.
Thanks,
Joe
---
signals: Allow tasks to cache one sigqueue struct, version 2
To avoid allocation overhead, allow all tasks to cache one sigqueue struct in task struct.
[ This replaces version 1, which is unstable in several versions of the rt patch. ]
include/linux/sched.h +1 -0
@@ -935,6 +935,7 @@ struct task_struct {/* Signal handlers: */ struct signal_struct *signal;struct sighand_struct *sighand; +struct sigqueue *sigqueue_cache;sigset_t blocked;sigset_t real_blocked;/* Restored if set_restore_sigmask() was used: */
include/linux/signal.h +1 -0
@@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ static inline void init_sigpending(struc }extern void flush_sigqueue (struct sigpending *queue); +extern void flush_task_sigqueue (struct task_struct *tsk);/* Test if 'sig' is valid signal. Use this instead of testing _NSIG directly */ static inline int valid_signal (unsigned long sig)
kernel/exit.c +1 -0
@@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ static void __exit_signal(struct task_stflush_sigqueue (&sig->shared_pending);tty_kref_put (tty); } +flush_task_sigqueue (tsk); }static void delayed_put_task_struct (struct rcu_head *rhp)
kernel/fork.c +2 -0
@@ -1587,6 +1587,7 @@ static int copy_signal(unsigned long cloinit_waitqueue_head (&sig->wait_chldexit); sig->curr_target = tsk;init_sigpending (&sig->shared_pending); + tsk->sigqueue_cache =NULL ;INIT_HLIST_HEAD (&sig->multiprocess);seqlock_init (&sig->stats_lock);prev_cputime_init (&sig->prev_cputime);
@@ -1924,6 +1925,7 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_struspin_lock_init (&p->alloc_lock);init_sigpending (&p->pending); + p->sigqueue_cache =NULL ; p->utime = p->stime = p->gtime =0 ;#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SCALED_CPUTIME
kernel/signal.c +15 -2
@@ -431,7 +431,9 @@ __sigqueue_alloc(int sig, struct task_strcu_read_unlock ();if (override_rlimit ||likely (sigpending <=task_rlimit (t,RLIMIT_SIGPENDING ))) { - q =kmem_cache_alloc (sigqueue_cachep, flags); + q =xchg (&t->sigqueue_cache,NULL ); +if (!q) + q =kmem_cache_alloc (sigqueue_cachep, flags); }else {print_dropped_signal (sig); }
@@ -454,7 +456,9 @@ static void __sigqueue_free(struct sigqureturn ;if (atomic_dec_and_test (&q->user->sigpending))free_uid (q->user); -kmem_cache_free (sigqueue_cachep, q); + q =xchg (¤t->sigqueue_cache, q); +if (q) +kmem_cache_free (sigqueue_cachep, q); }void flush_sigqueue (struct sigpending *queue)
@@ -469,6 +473,15 @@ void flush_sigqueue(struct sigpending *q } } +void flush_task_sigqueue (struct task_struct *t) +{ +struct sigqueue *q; + + q =xchg (&t->sigqueue_cache,NULL ); +if (q) +kmem_cache_free (sigqueue_cachep, q); +} +/* * Flush all pending signals for this kthread. */
Re: [PATCH] signals: Allow tasks to cache one sigqueue struct, version 2
Quoted 7 lines · Joe Korty
[5.4.28-rt19] Cache up to one sigqueue per task.
This replaces an earlier version of this rt patch,
signals-allow-rt-tasks-to-cache-one-sigqueue-struct.patch
which is able to generate a kernel splat of the form,
Does this
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
help the problem you see?
Sebastian
Re: [PATCH] signals: Allow tasks to cache one sigqueue struct, version 2
Quoted 5 lines · Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Quoted 4 lines · Joe Korty
[5.4.28-rt19] Cache up to one sigqueue per task.
This replaces an earlier version of this rt patch,
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
signals-allow-rt-tasks-to-cache-one-sigqueue-struct.patch
which is able to generate a kernel splat of the form,
Does this
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]help the problem you see?
Yes it does!
Thanks,
Joe