fscrypt: make '-o test_dummy_encryption' support v2 policies
Subsystems (4)
Eric Biggers
maintainercover fscrypt: make '-o test_dummy_encryption' support v2 policies
v1 encryption policies are deprecated in favor of v2, and some new features (e.g. encryption+casefolding) are only being added for v2.
As a result, the "test_dummy_encryption" mount option (which is used for encryption I/O testing with xfstests) needs to support v2 policies.
Therefore, this patchset adds support for specifying "test_dummy_encryption=v2" (or "test_dummy_encryption=v1"). To make this possible, it reworks the way the test_dummy_encryption mount option is handled to make it more flexible than a flag, and to automatically add the test dummy key to the filesystem's keyring.
Patch 4 additionally changes the default to "v2".
This patchset applies to v5.7-rc4.
Eric Biggers (4):
linux/parser.h: add include guards
fscrypt: add fscrypt_add_test_dummy_key()
fscrypt: support test_dummy_encryption=v2
fscrypt: make test_dummy_encryption use v2 by default
Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.rst | 6 +- fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h | 3 + fs/crypto/keyring.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++---------- fs/crypto/keysetup.c | 15 ++-- fs/crypto/policy.c | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ fs/ext4/ext4.h | 7 +- fs/ext4/super.c | 68 ++++++++++++---- fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 4 +- fs/f2fs/super.c | 85 ++++++++++++++------ include/linux/fscrypt.h | 52 ++++++++++-- include/linux/parser.h | 5 +- 11 files changed, 383 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.26.2
Eric Biggers
maintainerPATCH 1/4 linux/parser.h: add include guards
From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
<linux/parser.h> is missing include guards. Add them.
This is needed to allow declaring a function in <linux/fscrypt.h> that takes a substring_t parameter.
--- include/linux/parser.h | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
include/linux/parser.h +4 -1
@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@* but could potentially be used anywhere else that simple option=arg * parsing is required. */ - +#ifndef _LINUX_PARSER_H +#define _LINUX_PARSER_H/* associates an integer enumerator with a pattern string. */ struct match_token {
@@ -34,3 +35,5 @@ int match_hex(substring_t *, int *result);bool match_wildcard (const char *pattern,const char *str);size_t match_strlcpy (char *,const substring_t *,size_t );char *match_strdup (const substring_t *); + +#endif /* _LINUX_PARSER_H */
Signature · 1 line
2.26.2
Re: [PATCH 1/4] linux/parser.h: add include guards
Quoted 8 lines · Eric Biggers
From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
<
linux/parser.h> is missing include guards. Add them.This is needed to allow declaring a function in <
linux/fscrypt.h> that takes asubstring_tparameter.Signed-off-by Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
Re: [PATCH 1/4] linux/parser.h: add include guards
Quoted 11 lines · Theodore Y. Ts'o
Quoted 8 lines · Eric Biggers
From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
<
linux/parser.h> is missing include guards. Add them.This is needed to allow declaring a function in <
linux/fscrypt.h> that takes asubstring_tparameter.Signed-off-by Eric Biggers <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]>
Eric Biggers
maintainerPATCH 2/4 fscrypt: add fscrypt_add_test_dummy_key()
In reply to Eric BiggersFrom: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
Currently, the test_dummy_encryption mount option (which is used for encryption I/O testing with xfstests) uses v1 encryption policies, and it relies on userspace inserting a test key into the session keyring.
We need test_dummy_encryption to support v2 encryption policies too. Requiring userspace to add the test key doesn't work well with v2 policies, since v2 policies only support the filesystem keyring (not the session keyring), and keys in the filesystem keyring are lost when the filesystem is unmounted. Hooking all test code that unmounts and re-mounts the filesystem would be difficult.
Instead, let's make the filesystem automatically add the test key to its keyring when test_dummy_encryption is enabled.
That puts the responsibility for choosing the test key on the kernel. We could just hard-code a key. But out of paranoia, let's first try using a per-boot random key, to prevent this code from being misused. A per-boot key will work as long as no one expects dummy-encrypted files to remain accessible after a reboot. (gce-xfstests doesn't.)
Therefore, this patch adds a function fscrypt_add_test_dummy_key() which implements the above. The next patch will use it.
--- fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h | 3 + fs/crypto/keyring.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h +3 -0
@@ -440,6 +440,9 @@ extern struct key * fscrypt_find_master_key(struct super_block *sb, const struct fscrypt_key_specifier *mk_spec); +int fscrypt_add_test_dummy_key (struct super_block *sb, +struct fscrypt_key_specifier *key_spec); +extern int fscrypt_verify_key_added (struct super_block *sb,const u8 identifier[FSCRYPT_KEY_IDENTIFIER_SIZE ]);
fs/crypto/keyring.c +74 -43
155 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.26.2
Re: [PATCH 2/4] fscrypt: add fscrypt_add_test_dummy_key()
Quoted 22 lines · Eric Biggers
From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
Currently, the
test_dummy_encryptionmount option (which is used for encryption I/O testing with xfstests) uses v1 encryption policies, and it relies on userspace inserting a test key into the session keyring.We need
test_dummy_encryptionto support v2 encryption policies too. Requiring userspace to add the test key doesn't work well with v2 policies, since v2 policies only support the filesystem keyring (not the session keyring), and keys in the filesystem keyring are lost when the filesystem is unmounted. Hooking all test code that unmounts and re-mounts the filesystem would be difficult.Instead, let's make the filesystem automatically add the test key to its keyring when
test_dummy_encryptionis enabled.That puts the responsibility for choosing the test key on the kernel. We could just hard-code a key. But out of paranoia, let's first try using a per-boot random key, to prevent this code from being misused. A per-boot key will work as long as no one expects dummy-encrypted files to remain accessible after a reboot. (gce-xfstests doesn't.)
Quoted 4 lines
Therefore, this patch adds a function
fscrypt_add_test_dummy_key()which implements the above. The next patch will use it.Signed-off-by Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
Re: [PATCH 2/4] fscrypt: add fscrypt_add_test_dummy_key()
Quoted 23 lines · Theodore Y. Ts'o
Quoted 22 lines · Eric Biggers
From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
Currently, the
test_dummy_encryptionmount option (which is used for encryption I/O testing with xfstests) uses v1 encryption policies, and it relies on userspace inserting a test key into the session keyring.We need
test_dummy_encryptionto support v2 encryption policies too. Requiring userspace to add the test key doesn't work well with v2 policies, since v2 policies only support the filesystem keyring (not the session keyring), and keys in the filesystem keyring are lost when the filesystem is unmounted. Hooking all test code that unmounts and re-mounts the filesystem would be difficult.Instead, let's make the filesystem automatically add the test key to its keyring when
test_dummy_encryptionis enabled.That puts the responsibility for choosing the test key on the kernel. We could just hard-code a key. But out of paranoia, let's first try using a per-boot random key, to prevent this code from being misused. A per-boot key will work as long as no one expects dummy-encrypted files to remain accessible after a reboot. (gce-xfstests doesn't.)
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Therefore, this patch adds a function
fscrypt_add_test_dummy_key()which implements the above. The next patch will use it.Signed-off-by Eric Biggers <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]>
Eric Biggers
maintainerPATCH 3/4 fscrypt: support test_dummy_encryption=v2
In reply to Eric BiggersFrom: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
v1 encryption policies are deprecated in favor of v2, and some new features (e.g. encryption+casefolding) are only being added for v2.
Therefore, the "test_dummy_encryption" mount option (which is used for encryption I/O testing with xfstests) needs to support v2 policies.
To do this, extend its syntax to be "test_dummy_encryption=v1" or "test_dummy_encryption=v2". The existing "test_dummy_encryption" (no argument) also continues to be accepted, to specify the default setting -- currently v1, but the next patch changes it to v2.
To cleanly support both v1 and v2 while also making it easy to support specifying other encryption settings in the future (say, accepting "$contents_mode:$filenames_mode:v2"), make ext4 and f2fs maintain a pointer to the dummy fscrypt_context rather than using mount flags.
To avoid concurrency issues, don't allow test_dummy_encryption to be set or changed during a remount. (The former restriction is new, but xfstests doesn't run into it, so no one should notice.)
Tested with 'gce-xfstests -c {ext4,f2fs}/encrypt -g auto'. On ext4, there are two regressions, both of which are test bugs: ext4/023 and ext4/028 fail because they set an xattr and expect it to be stored inline, but the increase in size of the fscrypt_context from 24 to 40 bytes causes this xattr to be spilled into an external block.
--- Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.rst | 6 +- fs/crypto/keysetup.c | 15 ++-- fs/crypto/policy.c | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ fs/ext4/ext4.h | 7 +- fs/ext4/super.c | 68 ++++++++++++---- fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 4 +- fs/f2fs/super.c | 85 ++++++++++++++------ include/linux/fscrypt.h | 52 ++++++++++-- 8 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.rst +5 -1
@@ -225,8 +225,12 @@ fsync_mode=%s Control the policy of fsync. Currently supports "posix", pass, but the performance will regress. "nobarrier" is based on "posix", but doesn't issue flush command for non-atomic files likewise "nobarrier" mount option. -test_dummy_encryption Enable dummy encryption, which provides a fake fscrypt +test_dummy_encryption +test_dummy_encryption=%s + Enable dummy encryption, which provides a fake fscrypt context. The fake fscrypt context is used by xfstests. + The argument may be either "v1" or "v2", in order to + select the corresponding fscrypt policy version. checkpoint=%s[:%u[%]] Set to "disable" to turn off checkpointing. Set to "enable" to reenable checkpointing. Is enabled by default. While disabled, any unmounting or unexpected shutdowns will cause
fs/crypto/keysetup.c +6 -9
@@ -395,21 +395,18 @@ int fscrypt_get_encryption_info(struct inode *inode) res = inode->i_sb->s_cop->get_context (inode, &ctx,sizeof (ctx));if (res <0 ) { -if (!fscrypt_dummy_context_enabled (inode) || -IS_ENCRYPTED (inode)) { +const union fscrypt_context *dummy_ctx = +fscrypt_get_dummy_context (inode->i_sb); + +if (IS_ENCRYPTED (inode) || !dummy_ctx) {fscrypt_warn (inode,"Error %d getting encryption context" , res);return res; }/* Fake up a context for an unencrypted directory */ -memset (&ctx,0 ,sizeof (ctx)); - ctx.version =FSCRYPT_CONTEXT_V1 ; - ctx.v1.contents_encryption_mode =FSCRYPT_MODE_AES_256_XTS ; - ctx.v1.filenames_encryption_mode =FSCRYPT_MODE_AES_256_CTS ; -memset (ctx.v1.master_key_descriptor,0x42 , -FSCRYPT_KEY_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE ); - res =sizeof (ctx.v1); + res =fscrypt_context_size (dummy_ctx); +memcpy (&ctx, dummy_ctx, res); } crypt_info =kmem_cache_zalloc (fscrypt_info_cachep,GFP_NOFS );
fs/crypto/policy.c +125 -0
134 lines not on this page · raw message
fs/ext4/ext4.h +4 -3
@@ -1357,11 +1357,9 @@ struct ext4_super_block {*/ #define EXT4_MF_MNTDIR_SAMPLED 0x0001#define EXT4_MF_FS_ABORTED 0x0002/* Fatal error detected */ -#define EXT4_MF_TEST_DUMMY_ENCRYPTION 0x0004#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION -#define DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_ENABLED (sbi) (unlikely((sbi)->s_mount_flags & \ - EXT4_MF_TEST_DUMMY_ENCRYPTION)) +#define DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_ENABLED (sbi) ((sbi)->s_dummy_enc_ctx.ctx != NULL)#else #define DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_ENABLED (sbi) (0)#endif
@@ -1551,6 +1549,9 @@ struct ext4_sb_info {struct ratelimit_state s_warning_ratelimit_state;struct ratelimit_state s_msg_ratelimit_state; +/* Encryption context for '-o test_dummy_encryption' */ +struct fscrypt_dummy_context s_dummy_enc_ctx; +/* * Barrier between writepages ops and changing any inode's JOURNAL_DATA * or EXTENTS flag.
fs/ext4/super.c +54 -14
123 lines not on this page · raw message
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h +2 -2
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ struct f2fs_mount_info {int fsync_mode;/* fsync policy */ int fs_mode;/* fs mode: LFS or ADAPTIVE */ int bggc_mode;/* bggc mode: off, on or sync */ -bool test_dummy_encryption;/* test dummy encryption */ +struct fscrypt_dummy_context dummy_enc_ctx;/* test dummy encryption */ block_t unusable_cap;/* Amount of space allowed to be * unusable when disabling checkpoint */
@@ -1259,7 +1259,7 @@ enum fsync_mode {#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION #define DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_ENABLED (sbi) \ - (unlikely(F2FS_OPTION(sbi).test_dummy_encryption)) + (unlikely(F2FS_OPTION(sbi).dummy_enc_ctx.ctx != NULL))#else #define DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_ENABLED (sbi) (0)#endif
fs/f2fs/super.c +61 -24
159 lines not on this page · raw message
include/linux/fscrypt.h +45 -7
102 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.26.2
Re: [PATCH 3/4] fscrypt: support test_dummy_encryption=v2
Quoted 22 lines · Eric Biggers
From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
v1 encryption policies are deprecated in favor of v2, and some new features (e.g. encryption+casefolding) are only being added for v2.
Therefore, the "
test_dummy_encryption" mount option (which is used for encryption I/O testing with xfstests) needs to support v2 policies.To do this, extend its syntax to be "test_dummy_encryption=v1" or "test_dummy_encryption=v2". The existing "
test_dummy_encryption" (no argument) also continues to be accepted, to specify the default setting -- currently v1, but the next patch changes it to v2.To cleanly support both v1 and v2 while also making it easy to support specifying other encryption settings in the future (say, accepting "$contents_mode:$filenames_mode:v2"), make ext4 and f2fs maintain a pointer to the dummy
fscrypt_contextrather than using mount flags.To avoid concurrency issues, don't allow
test_dummy_encryptionto be set or changed during a remount. (The former restriction is new, but xfstests doesn't run into it, so no one should notice.)
Quoted 7 lines
Tested with 'gce-xfstests -c {ext4,f2fs}/encrypt -g auto'. On ext4, there are two regressions, both of which are test bugs: ext4/023 and ext4/028 fail because they set an xattr and expect it to be stored inline, but the increase in size of the
fscrypt_contextfrom 24 to 40 bytes causes this xattr to be spilled into an external block.Signed-off-by Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
Quoted 676 lines
--- Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.rst | 6 +- fs/crypto/keysetup.c | 15 ++-- fs/crypto/policy.c | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ fs/ext4/ext4.h | 7 +- fs/ext4/super.c | 68 ++++++++++++---- fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 4 +- fs/f2fs/super.c | 85 ++++++++++++++------ include/linux/fscrypt.h | 52 ++++++++++-- 8 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.rst +5
-1@@ -225,8 +225,12 @@ fsync_mode=%s Control the policy of fsync. Currently supports "posix", pass, but the performance will regress. "nobarrier" is based on "posix", but doesn't issue flush command for non-atomic files likewise "nobarrier" mount option. -test_dummy_encryption Enable dummy encryption, which provides a fake fscrypt +test_dummy_encryption +test_dummy_encryption=%s + Enable dummy encryption, which provides a fake fscrypt context. The fake fscrypt context is used by xfstests. + The argument may be either "v1" or "v2", in order to + select the corresponding fscrypt policy version. checkpoint=%s[:%u[%]] Set to "disable" to turn off checkpointing. Set to "enable" to reenable checkpointing. Is enabled by default. While disabled, any unmounting or unexpected shutdowns will causefs/crypto/keysetup.c +6
-9@@ -395,21 +395,18 @@ int fscrypt_get_encryption_info(struct inode *inode) res = inode->i_sb->s_cop->get_context (inode, &ctx,sizeof (ctx));if (res <0 ) { -if (!fscrypt_dummy_context_enabled (inode) || -IS_ENCRYPTED (inode)) { +const union fscrypt_context *dummy_ctx = +fscrypt_get_dummy_context (inode->i_sb); + +if (IS_ENCRYPTED (inode) || !dummy_ctx) {fscrypt_warn (inode,"Error %d getting encryption context" , res);return res; }/* Fake up a context for an unencrypted directory */ -memset (&ctx,0 ,sizeof (ctx)); - ctx.version =FSCRYPT_CONTEXT_V1 ; - ctx.v1.contents_encryption_mode =FSCRYPT_MODE_AES_256_XTS ; - ctx.v1.filenames_encryption_mode =FSCRYPT_MODE_AES_256_CTS ; -memset (ctx.v1.master_key_descriptor,0x42 , -FSCRYPT_KEY_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE ); - res =sizeof (ctx.v1); + res =fscrypt_context_size (dummy_ctx); +memcpy (&ctx, dummy_ctx, res); } crypt_info =kmem_cache_zalloc (fscrypt_info_cachep,GFP_NOFS );fs/crypto/policy.c +125
-0@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@*/ #include <linux/random.h> +#include <linux/seq_file.h> #include <linux/string.h> #include <linux/mount.h> #include "fscrypt_private.h" @@ -605,3 +606,127 @@ int fscrypt_inherit_context(struct inode *parent, struct inode *child,return preload ?fscrypt_get_encryption_info (child):0 ; }EXPORT_SYMBOL (fscrypt_inherit_context); + +/** +* fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption() - handle '-o test_dummy_encryption' +* @sb: the filesystem on which test_dummy_encryption is being specified +* @arg: the argument to the test_dummy_encryption option. +* If no argument was specified, then @arg->from == NULL. +* @dummy_ctx: the filesystem's current dummy context (input/output, see below) +* +* Handle the test_dummy_encryption mount option by creating a dummy encryption +* context, saving it in @dummy_ctx, and adding the corresponding dummy +* encryption key to the filesystem. If the @dummy_ctx is already set, then +* instead validate that it matches @arg. Don't support changing it via +* remount, as that is difficult to do safely. +* +* The reason we use an fscrypt_context rather than an fscrypt_policy is because +* we mustn't generate a new nonce each time we access a dummy-encrypted +* directory, as that would change the way filenames are encrypted. +* +* Return: 0 on success (dummy context set, or the same context is already set); +* -EEXIST if a different dummy context is already set; +* or another -errno value. +*/ +int fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption (struct super_block *sb, +const substring_t *arg, +struct fscrypt_dummy_context *dummy_ctx) +{ +const char *argstr ="v1" ; +const char *argstr_to_free =NULL ; +struct fscrypt_key_specifier key_spec = {0 }; +int version; +union fscrypt_context *ctx =NULL ; +int err; + +if (arg->from) { + argstr = argstr_to_free =match_strdup (arg); +if (!argstr) +return -ENOMEM ; + } + +if (!strcmp (argstr,"v1" )) { + version =FSCRYPT_CONTEXT_V1 ; + key_spec.type =FSCRYPT_KEY_SPEC_TYPE_DESCRIPTOR ; +memset (key_spec.u.descriptor,0x42 , +FSCRYPT_KEY_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE ); + }else if (!strcmp (argstr,"v2" )) { + version =FSCRYPT_CONTEXT_V2 ; + key_spec.type =FSCRYPT_KEY_SPEC_TYPE_IDENTIFIER ; +/* key_spec.u.identifier gets filled in when adding the key */ + }else { + err = -EINVAL ; + goto out; + } + +if (dummy_ctx->ctx) { +/* +* Note: if we ever make test_dummy_encryption support +* specifying other encryption settings, such as the encryption +* modes, we'll need to compare those settings here. +*/ +if (dummy_ctx->ctx->version == version) + err =0 ; +else + err = -EEXIST ; + goto out; + } + + ctx =kzalloc (sizeof (*ctx),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!ctx) { + err = -ENOMEM ; + goto out; + } + + err =fscrypt_add_test_dummy_key (sb, &key_spec); +if (err) + goto out; + + ctx->version = version; +switch (ctx->version) { +case FSCRYPT_CONTEXT_V1 : + ctx->v1.contents_encryption_mode =FSCRYPT_MODE_AES_256_XTS ; + ctx->v1.filenames_encryption_mode =FSCRYPT_MODE_AES_256_CTS ; +memcpy (ctx->v1.master_key_descriptor, key_spec.u.descriptor, +FSCRYPT_KEY_DESCRIPTOR_SIZE ); +break ; +case FSCRYPT_CONTEXT_V2 : + ctx->v2.contents_encryption_mode =FSCRYPT_MODE_AES_256_XTS ; + ctx->v2.filenames_encryption_mode =FSCRYPT_MODE_AES_256_CTS ; +memcpy (ctx->v2.master_key_identifier, key_spec.u.identifier, +FSCRYPT_KEY_IDENTIFIER_SIZE ); +break ; +default : +WARN_ON (1 ); + err = -EINVAL ; + goto out; + } + dummy_ctx->ctx = ctx; + ctx =NULL ; + err =0 ; +out: +kfree (ctx); +kfree (argstr_to_free); +return err; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption); + +/** +* fscrypt_show_test_dummy_encryption() - show '-o test_dummy_encryption' +* @seq: the seq_file to print the option to +* @sep: the separator character to use +* @sb: the filesystem whose options are being shown +* +* Show the test_dummy_encryption mount option, if it was specified. +* This is mainly used for /proc/mounts. +*/ +void fscrypt_show_test_dummy_encryption (struct seq_file *seq,char sep, +struct super_block *sb) +{ +const union fscrypt_context *ctx =fscrypt_get_dummy_context (sb); + +if (!ctx) +return ; +seq_printf (seq,"%ctest_dummy_encryption=v%d" , sep, ctx->version); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (fscrypt_show_test_dummy_encryption);fs/ext4/ext4.h +4
-3@@ -1357,11 +1357,9 @@ struct ext4_super_block {*/ #define EXT4_MF_MNTDIR_SAMPLED 0x0001#define EXT4_MF_FS_ABORTED 0x0002/* Fatal error detected */ -#define EXT4_MF_TEST_DUMMY_ENCRYPTION 0x0004#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION -#define DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_ENABLED (sbi) (unlikely((sbi)->s_mount_flags & \ - EXT4_MF_TEST_DUMMY_ENCRYPTION)) +#define DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_ENABLED (sbi) ((sbi)->s_dummy_enc_ctx.ctx != NULL)#else #define DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_ENABLED (sbi) (0)#endif @@ -1551,6 +1549,9 @@ struct ext4_sb_info {struct ratelimit_state s_warning_ratelimit_state;struct ratelimit_state s_msg_ratelimit_state; +/* Encryption context for '-o test_dummy_encryption' */ +struct fscrypt_dummy_context s_dummy_enc_ctx; +/* * Barrier between writepages ops and changing any inode's JOURNAL_DATA * or EXTENTS flag. fs/ext4/super.c +54
-14@@ -1106,6 +1106,7 @@ static void ext4_put_super(struct super_block *sb)crypto_free_shash (sbi->s_chksum_driver);kfree (sbi->s_blockgroup_lock);fs_put_dax (sbi->s_daxdev); +fscrypt_free_dummy_context (&sbi->s_dummy_enc_ctx);#ifdef CONFIG_UNICODE utf8_unload (sbi->s_encoding);#endif @@ -1389,9 +1390,10 @@ static int ext4_set_context(struct inode *inode, const void *ctx, size_t len,return res; } -static bool ext4_dummy_context (struct inode *inode) +static const union fscrypt_context * +ext4_get_dummy_context (struct super_block *sb) { -return DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_ENABLED (EXT4_SB (inode->i_sb)); +return EXT4_SB (sb)->s_dummy_enc_ctx.ctx; }static bool ext4_has_stable_inodes (struct super_block *sb)@@ -1410,7 +1412,7 @@ static const struct fscrypt_operations ext4_cryptops = { .key_prefix = "ext4:", .get_context = ext4_get_context, .set_context = ext4_set_context, - .dummy_context = ext4_dummy_context, + .get_dummy_context = ext4_get_dummy_context, .empty_dir = ext4_empty_dir, .max_namelen = EXT4_NAME_LEN, .has_stable_inodes = ext4_has_stable_inodes,@@ -1605,6 +1607,7 @@ static const match_table_t tokens = { {Opt_init_itable, "init_itable"}, {Opt_noinit_itable, "noinit_itable"}, {Opt_max_dir_size_kb, "max_dir_size_kb=%u"}, + {Opt_test_dummy_encryption, "test_dummy_encryption=%s"}, {Opt_test_dummy_encryption, "test_dummy_encryption"}, {Opt_nombcache, "nombcache"}, {Opt_nombcache, "no_mbcache"}, /* for backward compatibility */@@ -1816,7 +1819,7 @@ static const struct mount_opts { {Opt_jqfmt_vfsv0, QFMT_VFS_V0, MOPT_QFMT}, {Opt_jqfmt_vfsv1, QFMT_VFS_V1, MOPT_QFMT}, {Opt_max_dir_size_kb, 0, MOPT_GTE0}, - {Opt_test_dummy_encryption, 0, MOPT_GTE0}, + {Opt_test_dummy_encryption, 0, MOPT_STRING}, {Opt_nombcache, EXT4_MOUNT_NO_MBCACHE, MOPT_SET}, {Opt_err, 0, 0} };@@ -1851,6 +1854,48 @@ static int ext4_sb_read_encoding(const struct ext4_super_block *es, }#endif +static int ext4_set_test_dummy_encryption (struct super_block *sb, +const char *opt, +const substring_t *arg, +bool is_remount) +{ +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION +struct ext4_sb_info *sbi =EXT4_SB (sb); +int err; + +/* +* This mount option is just for testing, and it's not worthwhile to +* implement the extra complexity (e.g. RCU protection) that would be +* needed to allow it to be set or changed during remount. We do allow +* it to be specified during remount, but only if there is no change. +*/ +if (is_remount && !sbi->s_dummy_enc_ctx.ctx) { +ext4_msg (sb,KERN_WARNING , +"Can't set test_dummy_encryption on remount" ); +return -1 ; + } + err =fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption (sb, arg, &sbi->s_dummy_enc_ctx); +if (err) { +if (err == -EEXIST ) +ext4_msg (sb,KERN_WARNING , +"Can't change test_dummy_encryption on remount" ); +else if (err == -EINVAL ) +ext4_msg (sb,KERN_WARNING , +"Value of option \"%s\" is unrecognized" , opt); +else +ext4_msg (sb,KERN_WARNING , +"Error processing option \"%s\" [%d]" , + opt, err); +return -1 ; + } +ext4_msg (sb,KERN_WARNING ,"Test dummy encryption mode enabled" ); +#else +ext4_msg (sb,KERN_WARNING , +"Test dummy encryption mount option ignored" ); +#endif +return 1 ; +} +static int handle_mount_opt (struct super_block *sb,char *opt,int token,substring_t *args,unsigned long *journal_devnum,unsigned int *journal_ioprio,int is_remount)@@ -2047,14 +2092,8 @@ static int handle_mount_opt(struct super_block *sb, char *opt, int token, *journal_ioprio =IOPRIO_PRIO_VALUE (IOPRIO_CLASS_BE , arg); }else if (token == Opt_test_dummy_encryption) { -#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION - sbi->s_mount_flags |=EXT4_MF_TEST_DUMMY_ENCRYPTION ; -ext4_msg (sb,KERN_WARNING , -"Test dummy encryption mode enabled" ); -#else -ext4_msg (sb,KERN_WARNING , -"Test dummy encryption mount option ignored" ); -#endif +return ext4_set_test_dummy_encryption (sb, opt, &args[0 ], + is_remount); }else if (m->flags &MOPT_DATAJ ) {if (is_remount) {if (!sbi->s_journal)@@ -2311,8 +2350,8 @@ static int _ext4_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct super_block *sb,SEQ_OPTS_PRINT ("max_dir_size_kb=%u" , sbi->s_max_dir_size_kb);if (test_opt (sb,DATA_ERR_ABORT ))SEQ_OPTS_PUTS ("data_err=abort" ); -if (DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_ENABLED (sbi)) -SEQ_OPTS_PUTS ("test_dummy_encryption" ); + +fscrypt_show_test_dummy_encryption (seq, sep, sb);ext4_show_quota_options (seq, sb);return 0 ;@@ -4780,6 +4819,7 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)for (i =0 ; i <EXT4_MAXQUOTAS ; i++)kfree (get_qf_name (sb, sbi, i));#endif +fscrypt_free_dummy_context (&sbi->s_dummy_enc_ctx);ext4_blkdev_remove (sbi);brelse (bh); out_fail:fs/f2fs/f2fs.h +2
-2@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ struct f2fs_mount_info {int fsync_mode;/* fsync policy */ int fs_mode;/* fs mode: LFS or ADAPTIVE */ int bggc_mode;/* bggc mode: off, on or sync */ -bool test_dummy_encryption;/* test dummy encryption */ +struct fscrypt_dummy_context dummy_enc_ctx;/* test dummy encryption */ block_t unusable_cap;/* Amount of space allowed to be * unusable when disabling checkpoint */ @@ -1259,7 +1259,7 @@ enum fsync_mode {#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION #define DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_ENABLED (sbi) \ - (unlikely(F2FS_OPTION(sbi).test_dummy_encryption)) + (unlikely(F2FS_OPTION(sbi).dummy_enc_ctx.ctx != NULL))#else #define DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_ENABLED (sbi) (0)#endif fs/f2fs/super.c +61
-24@@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ static match_table_t f2fs_tokens = { {Opt_whint, "whint_mode=%s"}, {Opt_alloc, "alloc_mode=%s"}, {Opt_fsync, "fsync_mode=%s"}, + {Opt_test_dummy_encryption, "test_dummy_encryption=%s"}, {Opt_test_dummy_encryption, "test_dummy_encryption"}, {Opt_checkpoint_disable, "checkpoint=disable"}, {Opt_checkpoint_disable_cap, "checkpoint=disable:%u"},@@ -394,7 +395,52 @@ static int f2fs_check_quota_options(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) }#endif -static int parse_options (struct super_block *sb,char *options) +static int f2fs_set_test_dummy_encryption (struct super_block *sb, +const char *opt, +const substring_t *arg, +bool is_remount) +{ +struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi =F2FS_SB (sb); +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION +int err; + +if (!f2fs_sb_has_encrypt (sbi)) { +f2fs_err (sbi,"Encrypt feature is off" ); +return -EINVAL ; + } + +/* +* This mount option is just for testing, and it's not worthwhile to +* implement the extra complexity (e.g. RCU protection) that would be +* needed to allow it to be set or changed during remount. We do allow +* it to be specified during remount, but only if there is no change. +*/ +if (is_remount && !F2FS_OPTION (sbi).dummy_enc_ctx.ctx) { +f2fs_warn (sbi,"Can't set test_dummy_encryption on remount" ); +return -EINVAL ; + } + err =fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption ( + sb, arg, &F2FS_OPTION (sbi).dummy_enc_ctx); +if (err) { +if (err == -EEXIST ) +f2fs_warn (sbi, +"Can't change test_dummy_encryption on remount" ); +else if (err == -EINVAL ) +f2fs_warn (sbi,"Value of option \"%s\" is unrecognized" , + opt); +else +f2fs_warn (sbi,"Error processing option \"%s\" [%d]" , + opt, err); +return -EINVAL ; + } +f2fs_warn (sbi,"Test dummy encryption mode enabled" ); +#else +f2fs_warn (sbi,"Test dummy encryption mount option ignored" ); +#endif +return 0 ; +} + +static int parse_options (struct super_block *sb,char *options,bool is_remount) {struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi =F2FS_SB (sb);substring_t args[MAX_OPT_ARGS ];@@ -403,9 +449,7 @@ static int parse_options(struct super_block *sb, char *options)int arg =0 , ext_cnt;kuid_t uid;kgid_t gid; -#ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA int ret; -#endif if (!options)return 0 ;@@ -778,17 +822,10 @@ static int parse_options(struct super_block *sb, char *options)kvfree (name);break ;case Opt_test_dummy_encryption: -#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION -if (!f2fs_sb_has_encrypt (sbi)) { -f2fs_err (sbi,"Encrypt feature is off" ); -return -EINVAL ; - } - -F2FS_OPTION (sbi).test_dummy_encryption = true; -f2fs_info (sbi,"Test dummy encryption mode enabled" ); -#else -f2fs_info (sbi,"Test dummy encryption mount option ignored" ); -#endif + ret =f2fs_set_test_dummy_encryption (sb, p, &args[0 ], + is_remount); +if (ret) +return ret;break ;case Opt_checkpoint_disable_cap_perc:if (args->from &&match_int (args, &arg))@@ -1213,6 +1250,7 @@ static void f2fs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)for (i =0 ; i <MAXQUOTAS ; i++)kvfree (F2FS_OPTION (sbi).s_qf_names[i]);#endif +fscrypt_free_dummy_context (&F2FS_OPTION (sbi).dummy_enc_ctx);destroy_percpu_info (sbi);for (i =0 ; i <NR_PAGE_TYPE ; i++)kvfree (sbi->write_io[i]);@@ -1543,10 +1581,8 @@ static int f2fs_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct dentry *root)seq_printf (seq,",whint_mode=%s" ,"user-based" ); else if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).whint_mode == WHINT_MODE_FS) seq_printf(seq, ",whint_mode=%s", "fs-based"); -#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION -if (F2FS_OPTION (sbi).test_dummy_encryption) -seq_puts (seq,",test_dummy_encryption" ); -#endif + +fscrypt_show_test_dummy_encryption (seq,',' , sbi->sb);if (F2FS_OPTION (sbi).alloc_mode ==ALLOC_MODE_DEFAULT )seq_printf (seq,",alloc_mode=%s" ,"default" );@@ -1575,7 +1611,6 @@ static void default_options(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)F2FS_OPTION (sbi).whint_mode =WHINT_MODE_OFF ;F2FS_OPTION (sbi).alloc_mode =ALLOC_MODE_DEFAULT ;F2FS_OPTION (sbi).fsync_mode =FSYNC_MODE_POSIX ; -F2FS_OPTION (sbi).test_dummy_encryption = false;F2FS_OPTION (sbi).s_resuid =make_kuid (&init_user_ns,F2FS_DEF_RESUID );F2FS_OPTION (sbi).s_resgid =make_kgid (&init_user_ns,F2FS_DEF_RESGID );F2FS_OPTION (sbi).compress_algorithm =COMPRESS_LZ4 ;@@ -1734,7 +1769,7 @@ static int f2fs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)default_options (sbi);/* parse mount options */ - err =parse_options (sb, data); + err =parse_options (sb, data, true);if (err) goto restore_opts; checkpoint_changed =@@ -2410,9 +2445,10 @@ static int f2fs_set_context(struct inode *inode, const void *ctx, size_t len, ctx, len, fs_data, XATTR_CREATE); } -static bool f2fs_dummy_context (struct inode *inode) +static const union fscrypt_context * +f2fs_get_dummy_context (struct super_block *sb) { -return DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_ENABLED (F2FS_I_SB (inode)); +return F2FS_OPTION (F2FS_SB (sb)).dummy_enc_ctx.ctx; }static bool f2fs_has_stable_inodes (struct super_block *sb)@@ -2431,7 +2467,7 @@ static const struct fscrypt_operations f2fs_cryptops = { .key_prefix = "f2fs:", .get_context = f2fs_get_context, .set_context = f2fs_set_context, - .dummy_context = f2fs_dummy_context, + .get_dummy_context = f2fs_get_dummy_context, .empty_dir = f2fs_empty_dir, .max_namelen = F2FS_NAME_LEN, .has_stable_inodes = f2fs_has_stable_inodes,@@ -3366,7 +3402,7 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) goto free_sb_buf; } - err =parse_options (sb, options); + err =parse_options (sb, options, false);if (err) goto free_options;@@ -3769,6 +3805,7 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)for (i =0 ; i <MAXQUOTAS ; i++)kvfree (F2FS_OPTION (sbi).s_qf_names[i]);#endif +fscrypt_free_dummy_context (&F2FS_OPTION (sbi).dummy_enc_ctx);kvfree (options); free_sb_buf:kvfree (raw_super);include/linux/fscrypt.h +45
-7@@ -15,12 +15,15 @@#include <linux/fs.h> #include <linux/mm.h> +#include <linux/parser.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <uapi/linux/fscrypt.h> #define FS_CRYPTO_BLOCK_SIZE 16 +union fscrypt_context ;struct fscrypt_info ; +struct seq_file ;struct fscrypt_str {unsigned char *name;@@ -58,7 +61,8 @@ struct fscrypt_operations {const char *key_prefix;int (*get_context)(struct inode *,void *,size_t );int (*set_context)(struct inode *,const void *,size_t ,void *); -bool (*dummy_context)(struct inode *); +const union fscrypt_context *(*get_dummy_context)( +struct super_block *sb);bool (*empty_dir)(struct inode *);unsigned int max_namelen;bool (*has_stable_inodes)(struct super_block *sb);@@ -87,10 +91,12 @@ static inline bool fscrypt_needs_contents_encryption(const struct inode *inode)return IS_ENCRYPTED (inode) &&S_ISREG (inode->i_mode); } -static inline bool fscrypt_dummy_context_enabled (struct inode *inode) +static inline const union fscrypt_context * +fscrypt_get_dummy_context (struct super_block *sb) { -return inode->i_sb->s_cop->dummy_context && - inode->i_sb->s_cop->dummy_context (inode); +if (!sb->s_cop->get_dummy_context) +return NULL ; +return sb->s_cop->get_dummy_context (sb); }/* @@ -143,6 +149,23 @@ extern int fscrypt_ioctl_get_nonce(struct file *filp, void __user *arg);extern int fscrypt_has_permitted_context (struct inode *,struct inode *);extern int fscrypt_inherit_context (struct inode *,struct inode *,void *,bool ); + +struct fscrypt_dummy_context { +const union fscrypt_context *ctx; +}; + +int fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption (struct super_block *sb, +const substring_t *arg, +struct fscrypt_dummy_context *dummy_ctx); +void fscrypt_show_test_dummy_encryption (struct seq_file *seq,char sep, +struct super_block *sb); +static inline void +fscrypt_free_dummy_context (struct fscrypt_dummy_context *dummy_ctx) +{ +kfree (dummy_ctx->ctx); + dummy_ctx->ctx =NULL ; +} +/* keyring.c */ extern void fscrypt_sb_free (struct super_block *sb);extern int fscrypt_ioctl_add_key (struct file *filp,void __user *arg);@@ -222,9 +245,10 @@ static inline bool fscrypt_needs_contents_encryption(const struct inode *inode)return false; } -static inline bool fscrypt_dummy_context_enabled (struct inode *inode) +static inline const union fscrypt_context * +fscrypt_get_dummy_context (struct super_block *sb) { -return false; +return NULL ; }static inline void fscrypt_handle_d_move (struct dentry *dentry)@@ -319,6 +343,20 @@ static inline int fscrypt_inherit_context(struct inode *parent,return -EOPNOTSUPP ; } +struct fscrypt_dummy_context { +}; + +static inline void fscrypt_show_test_dummy_encryption (struct seq_file *seq, +char sep, +struct super_block *sb) +{ +} + +static inline void +fscrypt_free_dummy_context (struct fscrypt_dummy_context *dummy_ctx) +{ +} +/* keyring.c */ static inline void fscrypt_sb_free (struct super_block *sb) {@@ -676,7 +714,7 @@ static inline int fscrypt_prepare_symlink(struct inode *dir, unsigned int max_len, struct fscrypt_str *disk_link) { - if (IS_ENCRYPTED(dir) || fscrypt_dummy_context_enabled(dir)) + if (IS_ENCRYPTED(dir) || fscrypt_get_dummy_context(dir->i_sb) != NULL) return __fscrypt_prepare_symlink(dir, len, max_len, disk_link); disk_link->name = (unsigned char *)target;Signature · 1 line
2.26.2
Theodore Y. Ts'o
maintainerRe: [PATCH 3/4] fscrypt: support test_dummy_encryption=v2
In reply to Eric BiggersQuoted 22 lines · Eric Biggers
From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
v1 encryption policies are deprecated in favor of v2, and some new features (e.g. encryption+casefolding) are only being added for v2.
Therefore, the "
test_dummy_encryption" mount option (which is used for encryption I/O testing with xfstests) needs to support v2 policies.To do this, extend its syntax to be "test_dummy_encryption=v1" or "test_dummy_encryption=v2". The existing "
test_dummy_encryption" (no argument) also continues to be accepted, to specify the default setting -- currently v1, but the next patch changes it to v2.To cleanly support both v1 and v2 while also making it easy to support specifying other encryption settings in the future (say, accepting "$contents_mode:$filenames_mode:v2"), make ext4 and f2fs maintain a pointer to the dummy
fscrypt_contextrather than using mount flags.To avoid concurrency issues, don't allow
test_dummy_encryptionto be set or changed during a remount. (The former restriction is new, but xfstests doesn't run into it, so no one should notice.)
Quoted 7 lines
Tested with 'gce-xfstests -c {ext4,f2fs}/encrypt -g auto'. On ext4, there are two regressions, both of which are test bugs: ext4/023 and ext4/028 fail because they set an xattr and expect it to be stored inline, but the increase in size of the
fscrypt_contextfrom 24 to 40 bytes causes this xattr to be spilled into an external block.Signed-off-by Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
Looks good, but could you do me a favor and merge in this?
fs/ext4/sysfs.c +2 -0
@@ -293,6 +293,7 @@ EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE(batched_discard);EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE (meta_bg_resize);#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE (encryption); +EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE (test_dummy_encryption_v2);#endif #ifdef CONFIG_UNICODE EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE (casefold);
@@ -308,6 +309,7 @@ static struct attribute *ext4_feat_attrs[] = { ATTR_LIST(meta_bg_resize),#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION ATTR_LIST(encryption), + ATTR_LIST(test_dummy_encryption_v2),#endif #ifdef CONFIG_UNICODE ATTR_LIST(casefold),
This will make it easier to have the gce-xfstests test runner know whether or not test_dummy_encryption=v1 / test_dummy_encryption=v2 will work, and whether test_dummy_encryption tests v1 or v2.
Thanks!
- Ted
Eric Biggers
maintainerRe: [PATCH 3/4] fscrypt: support test_dummy_encryption=v2
Quoted 56 lines · Theodore Y. Ts'o
Quoted 22 lines · Eric Biggers
From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
v1 encryption policies are deprecated in favor of v2, and some new features (e.g. encryption+casefolding) are only being added for v2.
Therefore, the "
test_dummy_encryption" mount option (which is used for encryption I/O testing with xfstests) needs to support v2 policies.To do this, extend its syntax to be "test_dummy_encryption=v1" or "test_dummy_encryption=v2". The existing "
test_dummy_encryption" (no argument) also continues to be accepted, to specify the default setting -- currently v1, but the next patch changes it to v2.To cleanly support both v1 and v2 while also making it easy to support specifying other encryption settings in the future (say, accepting "$contents_mode:$filenames_mode:v2"), make ext4 and f2fs maintain a pointer to the dummy
fscrypt_contextrather than using mount flags.To avoid concurrency issues, don't allow
test_dummy_encryptionto be set or changed during a remount. (The former restriction is new, but xfstests doesn't run into it, so no one should notice.)Quoted 7 lines
Tested with 'gce-xfstests -c {ext4,f2fs}/encrypt -g auto'. On ext4, there are two regressions, both of which are test bugs: ext4/023 and ext4/028 fail because they set an xattr and expect it to be stored inline, but the increase in size of the
fscrypt_contextfrom 24 to 40 bytes causes this xattr to be spilled into an external block.Signed-off-by Eric Biggers <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]>Looks good, but could you do me a favor and merge in this?
fs/ext4/sysfs.c +2
-0@@ -293,6 +293,7 @@ EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE(batched_discard);EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE (meta_bg_resize);#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE (encryption); +EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE (test_dummy_encryption_v2);#endif #ifdef CONFIG_UNICODE EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE (casefold);@@ -308,6 +309,7 @@ static struct attribute *ext4_feat_attrs[] = { ATTR_LIST(meta_bg_resize),#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION ATTR_LIST(encryption), + ATTR_LIST(test_dummy_encryption_v2),#endif #ifdef CONFIG_UNICODE ATTR_LIST(casefold),
Quoted 4 lines
This will make it easier to have the gce-xfstests test runner know whether or not test_dummy_encryption=v1 / test_dummy_encryption=v2 will work, and whether
test_dummy_encryptiontests v1 or v2.
Thanks, I'll add that. I assume you meant "Reviewed-by"?
- Eric
Eric Biggers
maintainerRe: [PATCH 3/4] fscrypt: support test_dummy_encryption=v2
Quoted 57 lines · Eric Biggers
Quoted 56 lines · Theodore Y. Ts'o
Quoted 22 lines · Eric Biggers
From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
v1 encryption policies are deprecated in favor of v2, and some new features (e.g. encryption+casefolding) are only being added for v2.
Therefore, the "
test_dummy_encryption" mount option (which is used for encryption I/O testing with xfstests) needs to support v2 policies.To do this, extend its syntax to be "test_dummy_encryption=v1" or "test_dummy_encryption=v2". The existing "
test_dummy_encryption" (no argument) also continues to be accepted, to specify the default setting -- currently v1, but the next patch changes it to v2.To cleanly support both v1 and v2 while also making it easy to support specifying other encryption settings in the future (say, accepting "$contents_mode:$filenames_mode:v2"), make ext4 and f2fs maintain a pointer to the dummy
fscrypt_contextrather than using mount flags.To avoid concurrency issues, don't allow
test_dummy_encryptionto be set or changed during a remount. (The former restriction is new, but xfstests doesn't run into it, so no one should notice.)Quoted 7 lines
Tested with 'gce-xfstests -c {ext4,f2fs}/encrypt -g auto'. On ext4, there are two regressions, both of which are test bugs: ext4/023 and ext4/028 fail because they set an xattr and expect it to be stored inline, but the increase in size of the
fscrypt_contextfrom 24 to 40 bytes causes this xattr to be spilled into an external block.Signed-off-by Eric Biggers <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]>Looks good, but could you do me a favor and merge in this?
fs/ext4/sysfs.c +2
-0@@ -293,6 +293,7 @@ EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE(batched_discard);EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE (meta_bg_resize);#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE (encryption); +EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE (test_dummy_encryption_v2);#endif #ifdef CONFIG_UNICODE EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE (casefold);@@ -308,6 +309,7 @@ static struct attribute *ext4_feat_attrs[] = { ATTR_LIST(meta_bg_resize),#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION ATTR_LIST(encryption), + ATTR_LIST(test_dummy_encryption_v2),#endif #ifdef CONFIG_UNICODE ATTR_LIST(casefold),
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
This will make it easier to have the gce-xfstests test runner know whether or not test_dummy_encryption=v1 / test_dummy_encryption=v2 will work, and whether
test_dummy_encryptiontests v1 or v2.Thanks, I'll add that. I assume you meant "Reviewed-by"?
Jaegeuk, do you want /sys/fs/f2fs/features/test_dummy_encryption_v2 as well, to match what Ted wants for ext4? It would be the following change:
fs/f2fs/sysfs.c +4 -0
@@ -446,6 +446,7 @@ enum feat_id {FEAT_SB_CHECKSUM ,FEAT_CASEFOLD ,FEAT_COMPRESSION , + FEAT_TEST_DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_V2, }; static ssize_t f2fs_feature_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,
@@ -466,6 +467,7 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_feature_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,case FEAT_SB_CHECKSUM :case FEAT_CASEFOLD :case FEAT_COMPRESSION : +case FEAT_TEST_DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_V2 :return sprintf (buf,"supported\n" ); }return 0 ;
@@ -563,6 +565,7 @@ F2FS_GENERAL_RO_ATTR(avg_vblocks);#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION F2FS_FEATURE_RO_ATTR (encryption,FEAT_CRYPTO ); +F2FS_FEATURE_RO_ATTR (test_dummy_encryption_v2,FEAT_TEST_DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_V2 );#endif #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED F2FS_FEATURE_RO_ATTR (block_zoned,FEAT_BLKZONED );
@@ -647,6 +650,7 @@ ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(f2fs); static struct attribute *f2fs_feat_attrs[] = {#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION ATTR_LIST(encryption), + ATTR_LIST(test_dummy_encryption_v2),#endif #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED ATTR_LIST(block_zoned),
Jaegeuk Kim
maintainerRe: [PATCH 3/4] fscrypt: support test_dummy_encryption=v2
Quoted 65 lines · Eric Biggers
Quoted 57 lines · Eric Biggers
Quoted 56 lines · Theodore Y. Ts'o
Quoted 22 lines · Eric Biggers
From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
v1 encryption policies are deprecated in favor of v2, and some new features (e.g. encryption+casefolding) are only being added for v2.
Therefore, the "
test_dummy_encryption" mount option (which is used for encryption I/O testing with xfstests) needs to support v2 policies.To do this, extend its syntax to be "test_dummy_encryption=v1" or "test_dummy_encryption=v2". The existing "
test_dummy_encryption" (no argument) also continues to be accepted, to specify the default setting -- currently v1, but the next patch changes it to v2.To cleanly support both v1 and v2 while also making it easy to support specifying other encryption settings in the future (say, accepting "$contents_mode:$filenames_mode:v2"), make ext4 and f2fs maintain a pointer to the dummy
fscrypt_contextrather than using mount flags.To avoid concurrency issues, don't allow
test_dummy_encryptionto be set or changed during a remount. (The former restriction is new, but xfstests doesn't run into it, so no one should notice.)Quoted 7 lines
Tested with 'gce-xfstests -c {ext4,f2fs}/encrypt -g auto'. On ext4, there are two regressions, both of which are test bugs: ext4/023 and ext4/028 fail because they set an xattr and expect it to be stored inline, but the increase in size of the
fscrypt_contextfrom 24 to 40 bytes causes this xattr to be spilled into an external block.Signed-off-by Eric Biggers <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]>Looks good, but could you do me a favor and merge in this?
fs/ext4/sysfs.c +2
-0@@ -293,6 +293,7 @@ EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE(batched_discard);EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE (meta_bg_resize);#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE (encryption); +EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE (test_dummy_encryption_v2);#endif #ifdef CONFIG_UNICODE EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE (casefold);@@ -308,6 +309,7 @@ static struct attribute *ext4_feat_attrs[] = { ATTR_LIST(meta_bg_resize),#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION ATTR_LIST(encryption), + ATTR_LIST(test_dummy_encryption_v2),#endif #ifdef CONFIG_UNICODE ATTR_LIST(casefold),Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
This will make it easier to have the gce-xfstests test runner know whether or not test_dummy_encryption=v1 / test_dummy_encryption=v2 will work, and whether
test_dummy_encryptiontests v1 or v2.Thanks, I'll add that. I assume you meant "Reviewed-by"?
Quoted 2 lines
Jaegeuk, do you want
/sys/fs/f2fs/features/test_dummy_encryption_v2as well, to match what Ted wants for ext4? It would be the following change:
Yes, please. Thank you.
Quoted 37 lines
fs/f2fs/sysfs.c +4
-0@@ -446,6 +446,7 @@ enum feat_id {FEAT_SB_CHECKSUM ,FEAT_CASEFOLD ,FEAT_COMPRESSION , + FEAT_TEST_DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_V2, }; static ssize_t f2fs_feature_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,@@ -466,6 +467,7 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_feature_show(struct f2fs_attr *a,case FEAT_SB_CHECKSUM :case FEAT_CASEFOLD :case FEAT_COMPRESSION : +case FEAT_TEST_DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_V2 :return sprintf (buf,"supported\n" ); }return 0 ;@@ -563,6 +565,7 @@ F2FS_GENERAL_RO_ATTR(avg_vblocks);#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION F2FS_FEATURE_RO_ATTR (encryption,FEAT_CRYPTO ); +F2FS_FEATURE_RO_ATTR (test_dummy_encryption_v2,FEAT_TEST_DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_V2 );#endif #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED F2FS_FEATURE_RO_ATTR (block_zoned,FEAT_BLKZONED );@@ -647,6 +650,7 @@ ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(f2fs); static struct attribute *f2fs_feat_attrs[] = {#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION ATTR_LIST(encryption), + ATTR_LIST(test_dummy_encryption_v2),#endif #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED ATTR_LIST(block_zoned),
Re: [PATCH 3/4] fscrypt: support test_dummy_encryption=v2
In reply to Eric BiggersQuoted 2 lines · Eric Biggers
Thanks, I'll add that. I assume you meant "Reviewed-by"?
Yes, thanks.
- Ted
Eric Biggers
maintainerPATCH 4/4 fscrypt: make test_dummy_encryption use v2 by default
In reply to Eric BiggersFrom: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
Since v1 encryption policies are deprecated, make test_dummy_encryption test v2 policies by default.
Note that this causes ext4/023 and ext4/028 to start failing due to known bugs in those tests (see previous commit).
--- fs/crypto/policy.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
fs/crypto/policy.c +1 -1
@@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ int fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption(struct super_block *sb,const substring_t *arg, struct fscrypt_dummy_context *dummy_ctx) { - const char *argstr = "v1"; + const char *argstr = "v2";const char *argstr_to_free =NULL ;struct fscrypt_key_specifier key_spec = {0 };int version;
Signature · 1 line
2.26.2
Re: [PATCH 4/4] fscrypt: make test_dummy_encryption use v2 by default
Quoted 9 lines · Eric Biggers
From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
Since v1 encryption policies are deprecated, make
test_dummy_encryptiontest v2 policies by default.Note that this causes ext4/023 and ext4/028 to start failing due to known bugs in those tests (see previous commit).
Signed-off-by Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
Quoted 19 lines
--- fs/crypto/policy.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)fs/crypto/policy.c +1
-1@@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ int fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption(struct super_block *sb,const substring_t *arg, struct fscrypt_dummy_context *dummy_ctx) { - const char *argstr = "v1"; + const char *argstr = "v2";const char *argstr_to_free =NULL ;struct fscrypt_key_specifier key_spec = {0 };int version;Signature · 1 line
2.26.2
Theodore Y. Ts'o
maintainerRe: [PATCH 4/4] fscrypt: make test_dummy_encryption use v2 by default
In reply to Eric BiggersQuoted 9 lines · Eric Biggers
From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
Since v1 encryption policies are deprecated, make
test_dummy_encryptiontest v2 policies by default.Note that this causes ext4/023 and ext4/028 to start failing due to known bugs in those tests (see previous commit).
Signed-off-by Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
- Ted
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
Eric Biggers
maintainerQuoted 14 lines · Eric Biggers
v1 encryption policies are deprecated in favor of v2, and some new features (e.g. encryption+casefolding) are only being added for v2.
As a result, the "
test_dummy_encryption" mount option (which is used for encryption I/O testing with xfstests) needs to support v2 policies.Therefore, this patchset adds support for specifying "test_dummy_encryption=v2" (or "test_dummy_encryption=v1"). To make this possible, it reworks the way the
test_dummy_encryptionmount option is handled to make it more flexible than a flag, and to automatically add the test dummy key to the filesystem's keyring.Patch 4 additionally changes the default to "v2".
Quoted 8 lines
This patchset applies to v5.7-rc4.
Eric Biggers (4):
linux/parser.h: add include guards
fscrypt: addfscrypt_add_test_dummy_key()
fscrypt: support test_dummy_encryption=v2
fscrypt: maketest_dummy_encryptionuse v2 by default
All applied to fscrypt.git#master for 5.8 (including the sysfs additions to patch 3, as was discussed)
- Eric