liquidio: Replace vmalloc_node + memset with vzalloc_node and use array_size
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 liquidio: Replace vmalloc_node + memset with vzalloc_node and use array_size
Use vzalloc/vzalloc_node instead of the vmalloc/vzalloc_node and memset.
Also, notice that vzalloc_node() function has no 2-factor argument form to calculate the size for the allocation, so multiplication factors need to be wrapped in array_size().
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle and, audited and fixed manually.
Addresses-KSPP-ID: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/83
--- drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/request_manager.c | 10 +++------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/request_manager.c +3 -7
@@ -95,12 +95,10 @@ int octeon_init_instr_queue(struct octeon_device *oct,/* Initialize a list to holds requests that have been posted to Octeon * but has yet to be fetched by octeon */ - iq->request_list =vmalloc_node ((sizeof (*iq->request_list) * num_descs), - numa_node); + iq->request_list =vzalloc_node (array_size (num_descs,sizeof (*iq->request_list)), + numa_node);if (!iq->request_list) - iq->request_list = -vmalloc (array_size (num_descs, -sizeof (*iq->request_list))); + iq->request_list =vzalloc (array_size (num_descs,sizeof (*iq->request_list)));if (!iq->request_list) {lio_dma_free (oct, q_size, iq->base_addr, iq->base_addr_dma); dev_err(&oct->pci_dev->dev, "Alloc failed for IQ[%d] nr free list\n",
@@ -108,8 +106,6 @@ int octeon_init_instr_queue(struct octeon_device *oct,return 1 ; } -memset (iq->request_list,0 ,sizeof (*iq->request_list) * num_descs); -dev_dbg (&oct->pci_dev->dev,"IQ[%d]: base: %p basedma: %pad count: %d\n" , iq_no, iq->base_addr, &iq->base_addr_dma, iq->max_count);
Signature · 1 line
2.27.0
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:18:55 -0500
Quoted 11 lines
Use vzalloc/vzalloc_node instead of the vmalloc/vzalloc_node and memset.
Also, notice that
vzalloc_node()function has no 2-factor argument form to calculate the size for the allocation, so multiplication factors need to be wrapped inarray_size().This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle and, audited and fixed manually.
Addresses-KSPP-ID: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/83
Signed-off-by Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Applied to net-next, thanks.