ASoC: dt-bindings: simple-card: Fix 'make dt_binding_check' warnings
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 ASoC: dt-bindings: simple-card: Fix 'make dt_binding_check' warnings
The following build warnings are seen with 'make dt_binding_check':
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:209.46-211.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-4/sound/simple-audio-card,cpu@0: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:213.37-215.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-4/sound/simple-audio-card,cpu@1: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:250.42-261.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@0: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:263.42-288.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:270.32-272.19: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1/cpu@0: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:273.23-275.19: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1/cpu@1: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:276.23-278.19: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1/cpu@2: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:279.23-281.19: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1/cpu@3: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:290.42-303.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@2: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
Fix them all.
--- .../devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.yaml | 17 +++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.yaml +13 -4
@@ -378,6 +378,8 @@ examples: - | sound { compatible = "simple-audio-card"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; simple-audio-card,name = "rsnd-ak4643"; simple-audio-card,format = "left_j";
@@ -391,10 +393,12 @@ examples: "ak4642 Playback", "DAI1 Playback"; dpcmcpu: simple-audio-card,cpu@0 { + reg = <0>; sound-dai = <&rcar_sound 0>; }; simple-audio-card,cpu@1 { + reg = <1>; sound-dai = <&rcar_sound 1>; };
@@ -418,6 +422,8 @@ examples: - | sound { compatible = "simple-audio-card"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; simple-audio-card,routing = "pcm3168a Playback", "DAI1 Playback",
@@ -426,6 +432,7 @@ examples: "pcm3168a Playback", "DAI4 Playback"; simple-audio-card,dai-link@0 { + reg = <0>; format = "left_j"; bitclock-master = <&sndcpu0>; frame-master = <&sndcpu0>;
@@ -439,22 +446,23 @@ examples: }; simple-audio-card,dai-link@1 { + reg = <1>; format = "i2s"; bitclock-master = <&sndcpu1>; frame-master = <&sndcpu1>; convert-channels = <8>; /* TDM Split */ - sndcpu1: cpu@0 { + sndcpu1: cpu0 { sound-dai = <&rcar_sound 1>; }; - cpu@1 { + cpu1 { sound-dai = <&rcar_sound 2>; }; - cpu@2 { + cpu2 { sound-dai = <&rcar_sound 3>; }; - cpu@3 { + cpu3 { sound-dai = <&rcar_sound 4>; }; codec {
@@ -466,6 +474,7 @@ examples: }; simple-audio-card,dai-link@2 { + reg = <2>; format = "i2s"; bitclock-master = <&sndcpu2>; frame-master = <&sndcpu2>;
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
Mark Brown
maintainerQuoted 12 lines · Fabio Estevam
The following build warnings are seen with 'make
dt_binding_check':Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:209.46-211.15: Warning (
unit_address_vs_reg): /example-4/sound/simple-audio-card,cpu@0: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:213.37-215.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-4/sound/simple-audio-card,cpu@1: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:250.42-261.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@0: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:263.42-288.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:270.32-272.19: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1/cpu@0: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:273.23-275.19: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1/cpu@1: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:276.23-278.19: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1/cpu@2: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:279.23-281.19: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1/cpu@3: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:290.42-303.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@2: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
Quoted 1 line
[...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: dt-bindings: simple-card: Fix 'make dt_binding_check' warnings
commit: 88ba5f4a642e4fb6ab7058254967f55375ca068d
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
Quoted 14 lines · Mark Brown
Quoted 12 lines · Fabio Estevam
The following build warnings are seen with 'make
dt_binding_check':Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:209.46-211.15: Warning (
unit_address_vs_reg): /example-4/sound/simple-audio-card,cpu@0: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:213.37-215.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-4/sound/simple-audio-card,cpu@1: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:250.42-261.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@0: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:263.42-288.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:270.32-272.19: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1/cpu@0: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:273.23-275.19: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1/cpu@1: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:276.23-278.19: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1/cpu@2: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:279.23-281.19: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1/cpu@3: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:290.42-303.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@2: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
[...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Can you apply this for v5.8 or drop and I can apply with all the other warning fixes I have queued. This is the last one.
Rob
Kuninori Morimoto
maintainerHi Rob
I'm posting same patch and waiting review/response.
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: simple-card: care missing address #address-cells Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 12:54:56 +0900
and am sending question mail accordingly
Subject: Question about "xxx,yyy" style property Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 11:41:53 +0900
Nothing happen until now...
Quoted 17 lines · Mark Brown
Quoted 16 lines · Fabio Estevam
Quoted 13 lines
The following build warnings are seen with 'make
dt_binding_check':Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:209.46-211.15: Warning (
unit_address_vs_reg): /example-4/sound/simple-audio-card,cpu@0: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:213.37-215.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-4/sound/simple-audio-card,cpu@1: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:250.42-261.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@0: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:263.42-288.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:270.32-272.19: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1/cpu@0: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:273.23-275.19: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1/cpu@1: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:276.23-278.19: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1/cpu@2: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:279.23-281.19: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1/cpu@3: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:290.42-303.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@2: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property[...]
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Can you apply this for v5.8 or drop and I can apply with all the other warning fixes I have queued. This is the last one.
Rob
Thank you for your help !!
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto
Quoted 8 lines · Kuninori Morimoto
Hi Rob
I'm posting same patch and waiting review/response.
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: simple-card: care missing address #address-cells
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 12:54:56 +0900
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20200528223916.GA804926@bogus/
Quoted 7 lines
and am sending question mail accordingly
Subject: Question about "xxx,yyy" style property
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 11:41:53 +0900Nothing happen until now...
Sorry, if it's not a patch queued in patchwork, I may or may not see it.
Rob
Kuninori Morimoto
maintainerHi Rob
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
I'm posting same patch and waiting review/response.
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: simple-card: care missing address #address-cells
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 12:54:56 +0900https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20200528223916.GA804926@bogus/
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
and am sending question mail accordingly
Subject: Question about "xxx,yyy" style property
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 11:41:53 +0900Nothing happen until now...
Sorry, if it's not a patch queued in patchwork, I may or may not see it.
Yes, you suggested to add "additionalProperties",
and I had trouble, and asked.
Now you replayed to it, Thank you, I will re-try.
Thank you for your help !!
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto
Mark Brown
maintainerQuoted 12 lines · Fabio Estevam
The following build warnings are seen with 'make
dt_binding_check':Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:209.46-211.15: Warning (
unit_address_vs_reg): /example-4/sound/simple-audio-card,cpu@0: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:213.37-215.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-4/sound/simple-audio-card,cpu@1: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:250.42-261.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@0: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:263.42-288.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:270.32-272.19: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1/cpu@0: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:273.23-275.19: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1/cpu@1: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:276.23-278.19: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1/cpu@2: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:279.23-281.19: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@1/cpu@3: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/simple-card.example.dts:290.42-303.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-5/sound/simple-audio-card,dai-link@2: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
Quoted 1 line
[...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: dt-bindings: simple-card: Fix 'make dt_binding_check' warnings
commit: 88ba5f4a642e4fb6ab7058254967f55375ca068d
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark