usb-storage: always set hw_max_sectors in slave_configure to avoid inappropriate clamping
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 usb-storage: always set hw_max_sectors in slave_configure to avoid inappropriate clamping
When the scsi request queue is initialized/allocated, the scsi driver clamps hw_max_sectors against the dma max mapping size of sdev->host->dma_dev. The clamping is apparently inappriorate to USB drives.
Either way we are calling blk_queue_max_hw_sectors() in the usb drivers for some (but not all) cases, which causes the clamping to be overriden (inconsistently) anyway.
Therefore the usb driver should always set hw_max_sectors and do the clamping against the right device itself.
--- drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++------------------ drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c +17 -20
@@ -120,6 +120,23 @@ static int slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev)* better throughput on most devices. */ blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,2048 ); + }else { +/* +* Some devices are known to choke with anything larger. It seems like +* the problem stems from the fact that original IDE controllers had +* only an 8-bit register to hold the number of sectors in one transfer +* and even those couldn't handle a full 256 sectors. +* +* Because we want to make sure we interoperate with as many devices as +* possible, we will maintain a 240 sector transfer size limit for USB +* Mass Storage devices. +* +* Tests show that other operating have similar limits with Microsoft +* Windows 7 limiting transfers to 128 sectors for both USB2 and USB3 +* and Apple Mac OS X 10.11 limiting transfers to 256 sectors for USB2 +* and 2048 for USB3 devices. +*/ +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); }/*
@@ -626,26 +643,6 @@ static const struct scsi_host_template usb_stor_host_template = {/* lots of sg segments can be handled */ .sg_tablesize = SG_MAX_SEGMENTS, - -/* -* Limit the total size of a transfer to 120 KB. -* -* Some devices are known to choke with anything larger. It seems like -* the problem stems from the fact that original IDE controllers had -* only an 8-bit register to hold the number of sectors in one transfer -* and even those couldn't handle a full 256 sectors. -* -* Because we want to make sure we interoperate with as many devices as -* possible, we will maintain a 240 sector transfer size limit for USB -* Mass Storage devices. -* -* Tests show that other operating have similar limits with Microsoft -* Windows 7 limiting transfers to 128 sectors for both USB2 and USB3 -* and Apple Mac OS X 10.11 limiting transfers to 256 sectors for USB2 -* and 2048 for USB3 devices. -*/ - .max_sectors = 240, -/* emulated HBA */ .emulated = 1,
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +18 -5
@@ -827,11 +827,6 @@ static int uas_slave_alloc(struct scsi_device *sdev)*/ blk_queue_update_dma_alignment (sdev->request_queue, (512 -1 )); -if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ) -blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); -else if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240 ) -blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); -return 0 ; }
@@ -839,6 +834,24 @@ static int uas_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev) {struct uas_dev_info *devinfo = sdev->hostdata; +struct us_data *us =host_to_us (sdev->host); +struct device *dev = us->pusb_dev->bus->sysdev; + +if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); +else if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240 ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); +else +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,SCSI_DEFAULT_MAX_SECTORS ); + +/* +* The max_hw_sectors should be up to maximum size of a mapping for +* the device. Otherwise, a DMA API might fail on swiotlb environment. +*/ +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue, +min_t (size_t,queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue), +dma_max_mapping_size (dev) >>SECTOR_SHIFT )); +if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_NO_REPORT_OPCODES ) sdev->no_report_opcodes =1 ;
Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Alan Stern
maintainerPatch submissions should have text lines limited to fewer than 80 columns.
Quoted 4 lines · Tom Yan
When the scsi request queue is initialized/allocated, the scsi driver clamps
hw_max_sectorsagainst the dma max mapping size ofsdev->host->dma_dev. The clamping is apparently inappriorate to USB drives.
Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that the clamping _is_ appropriate, but it should be performed using the sysdev device rather than the nominal parent? Thus the error lies in allowing shost->dma_dev to be set incorrectly.
Quoted 6 lines
Either way we are calling
blk_queue_max_hw_sectors()in the usb drivers for some (but not all) cases, which causes the clamping to be overriden (inconsistently) anyway.Therefore the usb driver should always set
hw_max_sectorsand do the clamping against the right device itself.
How about fixing the dma_dev assignment instead?
Alan Stern
Quoted 105 lines
Signed-off-by Tom Yan <[email protected]>--- drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++------------------ drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c +17
-20@@ -120,6 +120,23 @@ static int slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev)* better throughput on most devices. */ blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,2048 ); + }else { +/* +* Some devices are known to choke with anything larger. It seems like +* the problem stems from the fact that original IDE controllers had +* only an 8-bit register to hold the number of sectors in one transfer +* and even those couldn't handle a full 256 sectors. +* +* Because we want to make sure we interoperate with as many devices as +* possible, we will maintain a 240 sector transfer size limit for USB +* Mass Storage devices. +* +* Tests show that other operating have similar limits with Microsoft +* Windows 7 limiting transfers to 128 sectors for both USB2 and USB3 +* and Apple Mac OS X 10.11 limiting transfers to 256 sectors for USB2 +* and 2048 for USB3 devices. +*/ +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); }/* @@ -626,26 +643,6 @@ static const struct scsi_host_template usb_stor_host_template = {/* lots of sg segments can be handled */ .sg_tablesize = SG_MAX_SEGMENTS, - -/* -* Limit the total size of a transfer to 120 KB. -* -* Some devices are known to choke with anything larger. It seems like -* the problem stems from the fact that original IDE controllers had -* only an 8-bit register to hold the number of sectors in one transfer -* and even those couldn't handle a full 256 sectors. -* -* Because we want to make sure we interoperate with as many devices as -* possible, we will maintain a 240 sector transfer size limit for USB -* Mass Storage devices. -* -* Tests show that other operating have similar limits with Microsoft -* Windows 7 limiting transfers to 128 sectors for both USB2 and USB3 -* and Apple Mac OS X 10.11 limiting transfers to 256 sectors for USB2 -* and 2048 for USB3 devices. -*/ - .max_sectors = 240, -/* emulated HBA */ .emulated = 1,drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +18
-5@@ -827,11 +827,6 @@ static int uas_slave_alloc(struct scsi_device *sdev)*/ blk_queue_update_dma_alignment (sdev->request_queue, (512 -1 )); -if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ) -blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); -else if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240 ) -blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); -return 0 ; }@@ -839,6 +834,24 @@ static int uas_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev) {struct uas_dev_info *devinfo = sdev->hostdata; +struct us_data *us =host_to_us (sdev->host); +struct device *dev = us->pusb_dev->bus->sysdev; + +if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); +else if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240 ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); +else +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,SCSI_DEFAULT_MAX_SECTORS ); + +/* +* The max_hw_sectors should be up to maximum size of a mapping for +* the device. Otherwise, a DMA API might fail on swiotlb environment. +*/ +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue, +min_t (size_t,queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue), +dma_max_mapping_size (dev) >>SECTOR_SHIFT )); +if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_NO_REPORT_OPCODES ) sdev->no_report_opcodes =1 ;Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Quoted 15 lines · Alan Stern
Patch submissions should have text lines limited to fewer than 80 columns.
Quoted 4 lines · Tom Yan
When the scsi request queue is initialized/allocated, the scsi driver clamps
hw_max_sectorsagainst the dma max mapping size ofsdev->host->dma_dev. The clamping is apparently inappriorate to USB drives.Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that the clamping _is_ appropriate, but it should be performed using the sysdev device rather than the nominal parent? Thus the error lies in allowing
shost->dma_devto be set incorrectly.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Either way we are calling
blk_queue_max_hw_sectors()in the usb drivers for some (but not all) cases, which causes the clamping to be overriden (inconsistently) anyway.Therefore the usb driver should always set
hw_max_sectorsand do the clamping against the right device itself.How about fixing the
dma_devassignment instead?
That won't really help unless we also do the clamping on the USB side *conditionally* (i.e. only after when we call blk_queue_max_hw_sectors() again there). I'm not sure there's a good reason for doing so.
Although this might seem a bit redundant/clumsy at first glance, it's also much easier to follow (e.g. we don't have to dive into the SCSI side to know where the hw_max_sectors came from).
Besides, the whole DMA thing is quite beyond my knowledge.
I'm going to fix the commit message, and use 2048 blocks for SS UAS drives.
Quoted 108 lines
Alan Stern
Quoted 105 lines
Signed-off-by Tom Yan <[email protected]>--- drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++------------------ drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c +17
-20@@ -120,6 +120,23 @@ static int slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev)* better throughput on most devices. */ blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,2048 ); + }else { +/* +* Some devices are known to choke with anything larger. It seems like +* the problem stems from the fact that original IDE controllers had +* only an 8-bit register to hold the number of sectors in one transfer +* and even those couldn't handle a full 256 sectors. +* +* Because we want to make sure we interoperate with as many devices as +* possible, we will maintain a 240 sector transfer size limit for USB +* Mass Storage devices. +* +* Tests show that other operating have similar limits with Microsoft +* Windows 7 limiting transfers to 128 sectors for both USB2 and USB3 +* and Apple Mac OS X 10.11 limiting transfers to 256 sectors for USB2 +* and 2048 for USB3 devices. +*/ +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); }/* @@ -626,26 +643,6 @@ static const struct scsi_host_template usb_stor_host_template = {/* lots of sg segments can be handled */ .sg_tablesize = SG_MAX_SEGMENTS, - -/* -* Limit the total size of a transfer to 120 KB. -* -* Some devices are known to choke with anything larger. It seems like -* the problem stems from the fact that original IDE controllers had -* only an 8-bit register to hold the number of sectors in one transfer -* and even those couldn't handle a full 256 sectors. -* -* Because we want to make sure we interoperate with as many devices as -* possible, we will maintain a 240 sector transfer size limit for USB -* Mass Storage devices. -* -* Tests show that other operating have similar limits with Microsoft -* Windows 7 limiting transfers to 128 sectors for both USB2 and USB3 -* and Apple Mac OS X 10.11 limiting transfers to 256 sectors for USB2 -* and 2048 for USB3 devices. -*/ - .max_sectors = 240, -/* emulated HBA */ .emulated = 1,drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +18
-6@@ -827,11 +827,6 @@ static int uas_slave_alloc(struct scsi_device *sdev)*/ blk_queue_update_dma_alignment (sdev->request_queue, (512 -1 )); -if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ) -blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); -else if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240 ) -blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); -return 0 ; }@@ -839,6 +834,24 @@ static int uas_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev) {struct uas_dev_info *devinfo = sdev->hostdata; +struct us_data *us =host_to_us (sdev->host); +struct device *dev = us->pusb_dev->bus->sysdev; + +if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); +else if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240 ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); +else +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,SCSI_DEFAULT_MAX_SECTORS ); + +/* +* The max_hw_sectors should be up to maximum size of a mapping for +* the device. Otherwise, a DMA API might fail on swiotlb environment. +*/ +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue, +min_t (size_t,queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue), +dma_max_mapping_size (dev) >>SECTOR_SHIFT )); +if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_NO_REPORT_OPCODES ) sdev->no_report_opcodes =1 ; --2.28.0
Oh I think I see your point now. If/When dma_dev is fixed / the same as bus->sysdev, it wouldn't hurt / matter if the clamping is done twice at different stages. max_sectors will be clamped to the same value no matter if it's set on the SCSI side or the USB side.
But again, fixing the dma_dev is beyond my knowledge. Probably need someone else to look into it.
Quoted 147 lines · Tom Yan
Quoted 15 lines · Alan Stern
Patch submissions should have text lines limited to fewer than 80 columns.
Quoted 4 lines · Tom Yan
When the scsi request queue is initialized/allocated, the scsi driver clamps
hw_max_sectorsagainst the dma max mapping size ofsdev->host->dma_dev. The clamping is apparently inappriorate to USB drives.Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that the clamping _is_ appropriate, but it should be performed using the sysdev device rather than the nominal parent? Thus the error lies in allowing
shost->dma_devto be set incorrectly.Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Either way we are calling
blk_queue_max_hw_sectors()in the usb drivers for some (but not all) cases, which causes the clamping to be overriden (inconsistently) anyway.Therefore the usb driver should always set
hw_max_sectorsand do the clamping against the right device itself.How about fixing the
dma_devassignment instead?That won't really help unless we also do the clamping on the USB side *conditionally* (i.e. only after when we call
blk_queue_max_hw_sectors()again there). I'm not sure there's a good reason for doing so.Although this might seem a bit redundant/clumsy at first glance, it's also much easier to follow (e.g. we don't have to dive into the SCSI side to know where the
hw_max_sectorscame from).Besides, the whole DMA thing is quite beyond my knowledge.
I'm going to fix the commit message, and use 2048 blocks for SS UAS drives.
Quoted 108 lines
Alan Stern
Quoted 105 lines
Signed-off-by Tom Yan <[email protected]>--- drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++------------------ drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c +17
-20@@ -120,6 +120,23 @@ static int slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev)* better throughput on most devices. */ blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,2048 ); + }else { +/* +* Some devices are known to choke with anything larger. It seems like +* the problem stems from the fact that original IDE controllers had +* only an 8-bit register to hold the number of sectors in one transfer +* and even those couldn't handle a full 256 sectors. +* +* Because we want to make sure we interoperate with as many devices as +* possible, we will maintain a 240 sector transfer size limit for USB +* Mass Storage devices. +* +* Tests show that other operating have similar limits with Microsoft +* Windows 7 limiting transfers to 128 sectors for both USB2 and USB3 +* and Apple Mac OS X 10.11 limiting transfers to 256 sectors for USB2 +* and 2048 for USB3 devices. +*/ +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); }/* @@ -626,26 +643,6 @@ static const struct scsi_host_template usb_stor_host_template = {/* lots of sg segments can be handled */ .sg_tablesize = SG_MAX_SEGMENTS, - -/* -* Limit the total size of a transfer to 120 KB. -* -* Some devices are known to choke with anything larger. It seems like -* the problem stems from the fact that original IDE controllers had -* only an 8-bit register to hold the number of sectors in one transfer -* and even those couldn't handle a full 256 sectors. -* -* Because we want to make sure we interoperate with as many devices as -* possible, we will maintain a 240 sector transfer size limit for USB -* Mass Storage devices. -* -* Tests show that other operating have similar limits with Microsoft -* Windows 7 limiting transfers to 128 sectors for both USB2 and USB3 -* and Apple Mac OS X 10.11 limiting transfers to 256 sectors for USB2 -* and 2048 for USB3 devices. -*/ - .max_sectors = 240, -/* emulated HBA */ .emulated = 1,drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +18
-6@@ -827,11 +827,6 @@ static int uas_slave_alloc(struct scsi_device *sdev)*/ blk_queue_update_dma_alignment (sdev->request_queue, (512 -1 )); -if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ) -blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); -else if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240 ) -blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); -return 0 ; }@@ -839,6 +834,24 @@ static int uas_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev) {struct uas_dev_info *devinfo = sdev->hostdata; +struct us_data *us =host_to_us (sdev->host); +struct device *dev = us->pusb_dev->bus->sysdev; + +if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); +else if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240 ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); +else +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,SCSI_DEFAULT_MAX_SECTORS ); + +/* +* The max_hw_sectors should be up to maximum size of a mapping for +* the device. Otherwise, a DMA API might fail on swiotlb environment. +*/ +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue, +min_t (size_t,queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue), +dma_max_mapping_size (dev) >>SECTOR_SHIFT )); +if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_NO_REPORT_OPCODES ) sdev->no_report_opcodes =1 ; --2.28.0
Alan Stern
maintainerQuoted 7 lines · Tom Yan
Oh I think I see your point now. If/When
dma_devis fixed / the same asbus->sysdev, it wouldn't hurt / matter if the clamping is done twice at different stages.max_sectorswill be clamped to the same value no matter if it's set on the SCSI side or the USB side.But again, fixing the
dma_devis beyond my knowledge. Probably need someone else to look into it.
It's straightforward. All you have to do is convert the calls to scsi_add_host() in usb.c and uas.c. Make them call scsi_add_host_with_dma() instead. The extra third argument should be a pointer to the sysdev device.
Once you do this, presumably your second patch will become unnecessary. Instead, maybe you can remove the clamping code in usb-storage.
Alan Stern
PATCH v2 1/2 uas: bump hw_max_sectors to 2048 blocks for SS or faster drives
In reply to Alan SternThere's no reason for uas to use a smaller value of max_sectors than usb-storage.
Also copying the dma max mapping size clamping from usb-storage.
--- drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 19 ++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +14 -5
@@ -827,11 +827,6 @@ static int uas_slave_alloc(struct scsi_device *sdev)*/ blk_queue_update_dma_alignment (sdev->request_queue, (512 -1 )); -if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ) -blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); -else if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240 ) -blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); -return 0 ; }
@@ -839,6 +834,20 @@ static int uas_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev) {struct uas_dev_info *devinfo = sdev->hostdata; +struct us_data *us =host_to_us (sdev->host); +struct device *dev = us->pusb_dev->bus->sysdev; + +if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); +else if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240 ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); +else if (us->pusb_dev->speed >=USB_SPEED_SUPER ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,2048 ); + +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue, +min_t (size_t,queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue), +dma_max_mapping_size (dev) >>SECTOR_SHIFT )); +if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_NO_REPORT_OPCODES ) sdev->no_report_opcodes =1 ;
Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
PATCH v2 2/2 usb-storage: always set hw_max_sectors in slave_configure to avoid inappropriate clamping
When the scsi request queue is initialized/allocated, the scsi driver clamps hw_max_sectors against the dma max mapping size of sdev->host->dma_dev. The device is currently inappriorate to use for USB drives.
Therefore, always (re)set hw_max_sectors in the usb drivers to invalidate the clamping.
--- drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++------------------ drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c +17 -20
@@ -120,6 +120,23 @@ static int slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev)* better throughput on most devices. */ blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,2048 ); + }else { +/* +* Some devices are known to choke with anything larger. It seems like +* the problem stems from the fact that original IDE controllers had +* only an 8-bit register to hold the number of sectors in one transfer +* and even those couldn't handle a full 256 sectors. +* +* Because we want to make sure we interoperate with as many devices as +* possible, we will maintain a 240 sector transfer size limit for USB +* Mass Storage devices. +* +* Tests show that other operating have similar limits with Microsoft +* Windows 7 limiting transfers to 128 sectors for both USB2 and USB3 +* and Apple Mac OS X 10.11 limiting transfers to 256 sectors for USB2 +* and 2048 for USB3 devices. +*/ +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); }/*
@@ -626,26 +643,6 @@ static const struct scsi_host_template usb_stor_host_template = {/* lots of sg segments can be handled */ .sg_tablesize = SG_MAX_SEGMENTS, - -/* -* Limit the total size of a transfer to 120 KB. -* -* Some devices are known to choke with anything larger. It seems like -* the problem stems from the fact that original IDE controllers had -* only an 8-bit register to hold the number of sectors in one transfer -* and even those couldn't handle a full 256 sectors. -* -* Because we want to make sure we interoperate with as many devices as -* possible, we will maintain a 240 sector transfer size limit for USB -* Mass Storage devices. -* -* Tests show that other operating have similar limits with Microsoft -* Windows 7 limiting transfers to 128 sectors for both USB2 and USB3 -* and Apple Mac OS X 10.11 limiting transfers to 256 sectors for USB2 -* and 2048 for USB3 devices. -*/ - .max_sectors = 240, -/* emulated HBA */ .emulated = 1,
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +2 -0
@@ -843,6 +843,8 @@ static int uas_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev)blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); else if (us->pusb_dev->speed >= USB_SPEED_SUPER) blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue, 2048); + else + blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue, SCSI_DEFAULT_MAX_SECTORS); blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue, min_t(size_t, queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue),
Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
I split it into two patches:
1. bump hw_max_sectors to 2048 for SS UAS drives and do the clamping for all UAS drives
2. make sure there's a "fallback" hw_max_sectors "change" so that the clamping on the SCSI side is invalidated.
If anyone can help fix the dma_dev, the second one can be omitted (better make the clamping on the USB side to use shost->dev->dma_dev though).
Quoted 85 lines · Tom Yan
When the scsi request queue is initialized/allocated, the scsi driver clamps
hw_max_sectorsagainst the dma max mapping size ofsdev->host->dma_dev. The device is currently inappriorate to use for USB drives.Therefore, always (re)set
hw_max_sectorsin the usb drivers to invalidate the clamping.Signed-off-by Tom Yan <[email protected]>--- drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++------------------ drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c +17
-20@@ -120,6 +120,23 @@ static int slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev)* better throughput on most devices. */ blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,2048 ); + }else { +/* +* Some devices are known to choke with anything larger. It seems like +* the problem stems from the fact that original IDE controllers had +* only an 8-bit register to hold the number of sectors in one transfer +* and even those couldn't handle a full 256 sectors. +* +* Because we want to make sure we interoperate with as many devices as +* possible, we will maintain a 240 sector transfer size limit for USB +* Mass Storage devices. +* +* Tests show that other operating have similar limits with Microsoft +* Windows 7 limiting transfers to 128 sectors for both USB2 and USB3 +* and Apple Mac OS X 10.11 limiting transfers to 256 sectors for USB2 +* and 2048 for USB3 devices. +*/ +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); }/* @@ -626,26 +643,6 @@ static const struct scsi_host_template usb_stor_host_template = {/* lots of sg segments can be handled */ .sg_tablesize = SG_MAX_SEGMENTS, - -/* -* Limit the total size of a transfer to 120 KB. -* -* Some devices are known to choke with anything larger. It seems like -* the problem stems from the fact that original IDE controllers had -* only an 8-bit register to hold the number of sectors in one transfer -* and even those couldn't handle a full 256 sectors. -* -* Because we want to make sure we interoperate with as many devices as -* possible, we will maintain a 240 sector transfer size limit for USB -* Mass Storage devices. -* -* Tests show that other operating have similar limits with Microsoft -* Windows 7 limiting transfers to 128 sectors for both USB2 and USB3 -* and Apple Mac OS X 10.11 limiting transfers to 256 sectors for USB2 -* and 2048 for USB3 devices. -*/ - .max_sectors = 240, -/* emulated HBA */ .emulated = 1,drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +2
-1@@ -843,6 +843,8 @@ static int uas_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev)blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); else if (us->pusb_dev->speed >= USB_SPEED_SUPER) blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue, 2048); + else + blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue, SCSI_DEFAULT_MAX_SECTORS); blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue, min_t(size_t, queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue), --2.28.0
Alan Stern
maintainerRe: [PATCH v2 1/2] uas: bump hw_max_sectors to 2048 blocks for SS or faster drives
In reply to Tom YanQuoted 27 lines · Tom Yan
There's no reason for uas to use a smaller value of
max_sectorsthan usb-storage.Also copying the dma max mapping size clamping from usb-storage.
Signed-off-by Tom Yan <[email protected]>--- drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 19 ++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +0
-5@@ -827,11 +827,6 @@ static int uas_slave_alloc(struct scsi_device *sdev)*/ blk_queue_update_dma_alignment (sdev->request_queue, (512 -1 )); -if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ) -blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); -else if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240 ) -blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); -return 0 ; }
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c static int uas_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev) · line 838
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +2
-0@@ -839,6 +834,20 @@ static int uas_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev) {struct uas_dev_info *devinfo = sdev->hostdata; +struct us_data *us =host_to_us (sdev->host); +struct device *dev = us->pusb_dev->bus->sysdev;
Yeah, this won't work. The uas driver doesn't use struct us_data at all. Instead you should have:
struct device *dev = devinfo->udev->bus->sysdev;
except that now you probably don't need it.
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c static int uas_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev) · line 844
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +6
-0+ +if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); +else if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240 ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); +else if (us->pusb_dev->speed >=USB_SPEED_SUPER )
Same thing here: devinfo->udev->speed.
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c static int uas_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev) · line 845
Quoted 1 line
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +1
-0+blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,2048 );
Also, you might want to check before doing this. If it would decrease the max_hw_sectors value, there's no point doing it.
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c static int uas_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev) · line 849
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +4
-0+ +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue, +min_t (size_t,queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue), +dma_max_mapping_size (dev) >>SECTOR_SHIFT ));
And presumably this will be unnecessary.
Alan Stern
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] uas: bump hw_max_sectors to 2048 blocks for SS or faster drives
Quoted 49 lines · Alan Stern
Quoted 27 lines · Tom Yan
There's no reason for uas to use a smaller value of
max_sectorsthan usb-storage.Also copying the dma max mapping size clamping from usb-storage.
Signed-off-by Tom Yan <[email protected]>--- drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 19 ++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +0
-5@@ -827,11 +827,6 @@ static int uas_slave_alloc(struct scsi_device *sdev)*/ blk_queue_update_dma_alignment (sdev->request_queue, (512 -1 )); -if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ) -blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); -else if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240 ) -blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); -return 0 ; }drivers/usb/storage/uas.c static int uas_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev) · line 838
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +2
-0@@ -839,6 +834,20 @@ static int uas_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev) {struct uas_dev_info *devinfo = sdev->hostdata; +struct us_data *us =host_to_us (sdev->host); +struct device *dev = us->pusb_dev->bus->sysdev;Yeah, this won't work. The uas driver doesn't use struct
us_dataat all. Instead you should have:struct device *dev = devinfo->udev->bus->sysdev;except that now you probably don't need it.
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c static int uas_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev) · line 844
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +6
-0+ +if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); +else if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240 ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); +else if (us->pusb_dev->speed >=USB_SPEED_SUPER )
Quoted 6 lines
Same thing here:
devinfo->udev->speed.drivers/usb/storage/uas.c static int uas_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev) · line 845
Quoted 1 line
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +1
-0+blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,2048 );Also, you might want to check before doing this. If it would decrease the
max_hw_sectorsvalue, there's no point doing it.
It wouldn't. Current SCSI_DEFAULT_MAX_SECTORS (which is used for "normal" uas drives) is 1024.
I'm not entirely sure if there's a point in doing more than that,
although BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS is 2560 (which originates from an odd
context: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/d2be537c3ba3568acd79cd178327b842e60d035e).
It just seems odd to me that we do less for SS UAS drives anyway.
(Maybe it was never necessary to go up to 2048 for SS BOT drives, I
don't know.)
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c static int uas_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev) · line 849
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +4
-0+ +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue, +min_t (size_t,queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue), +dma_max_mapping_size (dev) >>SECTOR_SHIFT ));And presumably this will be unnecessary.
It will still be. Whenever we change hw_max_sectors, it needs to be clamped again afterwards, because the original clamping would be invalidated.
Quoted 2 lines
Alan Stern
PATCH v3 1/2 usb-storage: fix sdev->host->dma_dev
Use scsi_add_host_with_dma() instead of scsi_add_host() in usb.c and uas.c.
When the scsi request queue is initialized/allocated, hw_max_sectors is clamped to the dma max mapping size. Therefore, the correct device that should be used for the clamping needs to be set.
The same clamping is still needed in the USB drivers as hw_max_sectors could be changed there. The original clamping would be invalidated in such cases.
--- drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c | 2 +- drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 17 +++++++++++------ drivers/usb/storage/usb.c | 5 +++-- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c +1 -1
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static int slave_alloc (struct scsi_device *sdev)static int slave_configure (struct scsi_device *sdev) {struct us_data *us =host_to_us (sdev->host); -struct device *dev = us->pusb_dev->bus->sysdev; +struct device *dev = sdev->host->dma_dev;/* * Many devices have trouble transferring more than 32KB at a time,
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +11 -6
@@ -827,17 +827,22 @@ static int uas_slave_alloc(struct scsi_device *sdev)*/ blk_queue_update_dma_alignment (sdev->request_queue, (512 -1 )); -if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ) -blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); -else if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240 ) -blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); -return 0 ; }static int uas_slave_configure (struct scsi_device *sdev) {struct uas_dev_info *devinfo = sdev->hostdata; +struct device *dev = sdev->host->dma_dev; + +if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); +else if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240 ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); + +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue, +min_t (size_t,queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue), +dma_max_mapping_size (dev) >>SECTOR_SHIFT ));if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_NO_REPORT_OPCODES ) sdev->no_report_opcodes =1 ;
@@ -1023,7 +1028,7 @@ static int uas_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_id *id) shost->can_queue = devinfo->qdepth -2 ;usb_set_intfdata (intf, shost); - result =scsi_add_host (shost, &intf->dev); + result =scsi_add_host_with_dma (shost, &intf->dev, udev->bus->sysdev);if (result) goto free_streams;
drivers/usb/storage/usb.c +3 -2
@@ -1049,8 +1049,9 @@ int usb_stor_probe2(struct us_data *us) goto BadDevice;usb_autopm_get_interface_no_resume (us->pusb_intf);snprintf (us->scsi_name,sizeof (us->scsi_name),"usb-storage %s" , -dev_name (&us->pusb_intf->dev)); - result =scsi_add_host (us_to_host (us), dev); +dev_name (dev)); + result =scsi_add_host_with_dma (us_to_host (us), dev, + us->pusb_dev->bus->sysdev);if (result) {dev_warn (dev,"Unable to add the scsi host\n" );
Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
PATCH v3 2/2 uas: bump hw_max_sectors to 2048 blocks for SS or faster drives
There's no reason for uas to use a smaller value of max_sectors than usb-storage.
--- drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +2 -0
@@ -839,6 +839,8 @@ static int uas_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev)blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); else if (devinfo->flags & US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240) blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue, 240); + else if (devinfo->udev->speed >= USB_SPEED_SUPER) + blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue, 2048); blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue, min_t(size_t, queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue),
Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Greg KH
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 1/2] usb-storage: fix sdev->host->dma_dev
In reply to Tom YanQuoted 9 lines · Tom Yan
Use
scsi_add_host_with_dma()instead ofscsi_add_host()inusb.canduas.c.When the scsi request queue is initialized/allocated,
hw_max_sectorsis clamped to the dma max mapping size. Therefore, the correct device that should be used for the clamping needs to be set.The same clamping is still needed in the USB drivers as
hw_max_sectorscould be changed there. The original clamping would be invalidated in such cases.
Quoted 6 lines
Signed-off-by Tom Yan <[email protected]>--- drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c | 2 +- drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 17 +++++++++++------ drivers/usb/storage/usb.c | 5 +++-- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
What changed from the previous version? Always include that below the --- line as is documented to do so.
Please fix up and resend.
thanks,
greg k-h
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] usb-storage: fix sdev->host->dma_dev
Hmm, actually the older versions were pretty much an entirely different approach/patch (not involving fixing the dma_dev at all). Should I just resend without the "v3"?
Quoted 26 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 9 lines · Tom Yan
Use
scsi_add_host_with_dma()instead ofscsi_add_host()inusb.canduas.c.When the scsi request queue is initialized/allocated,
hw_max_sectorsis clamped to the dma max mapping size. Therefore, the correct device that should be used for the clamping needs to be set.The same clamping is still needed in the USB drivers as
hw_max_sectorscould be changed there. The original clamping would be invalidated in such cases.Quoted 6 lines
Signed-off-by Tom Yan <[email protected]>--- drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c | 2 +- drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 17 +++++++++++------ drivers/usb/storage/usb.c | 5 +++-- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)What changed from the previous version? Always include that below the --- line as is documented to do so.
Please fix up and resend.
thanks,
greg k-h
Greg KH
maintainerRe: [PATCH v3 1/2] usb-storage: fix sdev->host->dma_dev
Quoted 3 lines · Tom Yan
Hmm, actually the older versions were pretty much an entirely different approach/patch (not involving fixing the
dma_devat all). Should I just resend without the "v3"?
As you already sent a v3 patch series, the next one would be v4, right? :)
thanks,
greg k-h
PATCH v4 1/2 usb-storage: fix sdev->host->dma_dev
Use scsi_add_host_with_dma() instead of scsi_add_host() in usb.c and uas.c.
When the scsi request queue is initialized/allocated, hw_max_sectors is clamped to the dma max mapping size. Therefore, the correct device that should be used for the clamping needs to be set.
The same clamping is still needed in the USB drivers as hw_max_sectors could be changed there. The original clamping would be invalidated in such cases.
---
v2: fix commit message line length; bump hw_max_sectors to 2048 for SS UAS drives; split the "fallback" hw_max_sectors setting into another patch
v3: use a different approach: fix the dma_dev instead
v4: add the changelog of the patch series
drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c | 2 +- drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 17 +++++++++++------ drivers/usb/storage/usb.c | 5 +++-- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c +1 -1
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static int slave_alloc (struct scsi_device *sdev)static int slave_configure (struct scsi_device *sdev) {struct us_data *us =host_to_us (sdev->host); -struct device *dev = us->pusb_dev->bus->sysdev; +struct device *dev = sdev->host->dma_dev;/* * Many devices have trouble transferring more than 32KB at a time,
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +11 -6
@@ -827,17 +827,22 @@ static int uas_slave_alloc(struct scsi_device *sdev)*/ blk_queue_update_dma_alignment (sdev->request_queue, (512 -1 )); -if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ) -blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); -else if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240 ) -blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); -return 0 ; }static int uas_slave_configure (struct scsi_device *sdev) {struct uas_dev_info *devinfo = sdev->hostdata; +struct device *dev = sdev->host->dma_dev; + +if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); +else if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240 ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); + +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue, +min_t (size_t,queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue), +dma_max_mapping_size (dev) >>SECTOR_SHIFT ));if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_NO_REPORT_OPCODES ) sdev->no_report_opcodes =1 ;
@@ -1023,7 +1028,7 @@ static int uas_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_id *id) shost->can_queue = devinfo->qdepth -2 ;usb_set_intfdata (intf, shost); - result =scsi_add_host (shost, &intf->dev); + result =scsi_add_host_with_dma (shost, &intf->dev, udev->bus->sysdev);if (result) goto free_streams;
drivers/usb/storage/usb.c +3 -2
@@ -1049,8 +1049,9 @@ int usb_stor_probe2(struct us_data *us) goto BadDevice;usb_autopm_get_interface_no_resume (us->pusb_intf);snprintf (us->scsi_name,sizeof (us->scsi_name),"usb-storage %s" , -dev_name (&us->pusb_intf->dev)); - result =scsi_add_host (us_to_host (us), dev); +dev_name (dev)); + result =scsi_add_host_with_dma (us_to_host (us), dev, + us->pusb_dev->bus->sysdev);if (result) {dev_warn (dev,"Unable to add the scsi host\n" );
Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
PATCH v4 2/2 uas: bump hw_max_sectors to 2048 blocks for SS or faster drives
There's no reason for uas to use a smaller value of max_sectors than usb-storage.
--- drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +2 -0
@@ -839,6 +839,8 @@ static int uas_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev)blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); else if (devinfo->flags & US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240) blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue, 240); + else if (devinfo->udev->speed >= USB_SPEED_SUPER) + blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue, 2048); blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue, min_t(size_t, queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue),
Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
PATCH v5 1/2 usb-storage: fix sdev->host->dma_dev
In reply to Greg KHUse scsi_add_host_with_dma() instead of scsi_add_host() in usb.c and uas.c.
When the scsi request queue is initialized/allocated, hw_max_sectors is clamped to the dma max mapping size. Therefore, the correct device that should be used for the clamping needs to be set.
The same clamping is still needed in the USB drivers as hw_max_sectors could be changed there. The original clamping would be invalidated in such cases.
---
v2: fix commit message line length; bump hw_max_sectors to 2048 for SS UAS drives; split the "fallback" hw_max_sectors setting into another patch
v3: use a different approach: fix the dma_dev instead
v4: add the changelog of the patch series
v5: fix changelog line length
drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c | 2 +- drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 17 +++++++++++------ drivers/usb/storage/usb.c | 5 +++-- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c +1 -1
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static int slave_alloc (struct scsi_device *sdev)static int slave_configure (struct scsi_device *sdev) {struct us_data *us =host_to_us (sdev->host); -struct device *dev = us->pusb_dev->bus->sysdev; +struct device *dev = sdev->host->dma_dev;/* * Many devices have trouble transferring more than 32KB at a time,
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +11 -6
@@ -827,17 +827,22 @@ static int uas_slave_alloc(struct scsi_device *sdev)*/ blk_queue_update_dma_alignment (sdev->request_queue, (512 -1 )); -if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ) -blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); -else if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240 ) -blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); -return 0 ; }static int uas_slave_configure (struct scsi_device *sdev) {struct uas_dev_info *devinfo = sdev->hostdata; +struct device *dev = sdev->host->dma_dev; + +if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); +else if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240 ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); + +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue, +min_t (size_t,queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue), +dma_max_mapping_size (dev) >>SECTOR_SHIFT ));if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_NO_REPORT_OPCODES ) sdev->no_report_opcodes =1 ;
@@ -1023,7 +1028,7 @@ static int uas_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_id *id) shost->can_queue = devinfo->qdepth -2 ;usb_set_intfdata (intf, shost); - result =scsi_add_host (shost, &intf->dev); + result =scsi_add_host_with_dma (shost, &intf->dev, udev->bus->sysdev);if (result) goto free_streams;
drivers/usb/storage/usb.c +3 -2
@@ -1049,8 +1049,9 @@ int usb_stor_probe2(struct us_data *us) goto BadDevice;usb_autopm_get_interface_no_resume (us->pusb_intf);snprintf (us->scsi_name,sizeof (us->scsi_name),"usb-storage %s" , -dev_name (&us->pusb_intf->dev)); - result =scsi_add_host (us_to_host (us), dev); +dev_name (dev)); + result =scsi_add_host_with_dma (us_to_host (us), dev, + us->pusb_dev->bus->sysdev);if (result) {dev_warn (dev,"Unable to add the scsi host\n" );
Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
PATCH v5 2/2 uas: bump hw_max_sectors to 2048 blocks for SS or faster drives
There's no reason for uas to use a smaller value of max_sectors than usb-storage.
--- drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +2 -0
@@ -839,6 +839,8 @@ static int uas_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev)blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); else if (devinfo->flags & US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240) blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue, 240); + else if (devinfo->udev->speed >= USB_SPEED_SUPER) + blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue, 2048); blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue, min_t(size_t, queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue),
Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Alan Stern
maintainerRe: [PATCH v5 1/2] usb-storage: fix sdev->host->dma_dev
In reply to Tom YanQuoted 93 lines · Tom Yan
Use
scsi_add_host_with_dma()instead ofscsi_add_host()inusb.canduas.c.When the scsi request queue is initialized/allocated,
hw_max_sectorsis clamped to the dma max mapping size. Therefore, the correct device that should be used for the clamping needs to be set.The same clamping is still needed in the USB drivers as
hw_max_sectorscould be changed there. The original clamping would be invalidated in such cases.Signed-off-by Tom Yan <[email protected]>---
v2: fix commit message line length; bumphw_max_sectorsto 2048 for SS UAS drives; split the "fallback"hw_max_sectorssetting into another patch
v3: use a different approach: fix thedma_devinstead
v4: add the changelog of the patch series
v5: fix changelog line lengthdrivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c | 2 +- drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 17 +++++++++++------ drivers/usb/storage/usb.c | 5 +++-- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c +1
-1@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static int slave_alloc (struct scsi_device *sdev)static int slave_configure (struct scsi_device *sdev) {struct us_data *us =host_to_us (sdev->host); -struct device *dev = us->pusb_dev->bus->sysdev; +struct device *dev = sdev->host->dma_dev;/* * Many devices have trouble transferring more than 32KB at a time, drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +11
-6@@ -827,17 +827,22 @@ static int uas_slave_alloc(struct scsi_device *sdev)*/ blk_queue_update_dma_alignment (sdev->request_queue, (512 -1 )); -if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ) -blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); -else if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240 ) -blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); -return 0 ; }static int uas_slave_configure (struct scsi_device *sdev) {struct uas_dev_info *devinfo = sdev->hostdata; +struct device *dev = sdev->host->dma_dev; + +if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); +else if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240 ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); + +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue, +min_t (size_t,queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue), +dma_max_mapping_size (dev) >>SECTOR_SHIFT ));if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_NO_REPORT_OPCODES ) sdev->no_report_opcodes =1 ;@@ -1023,7 +1028,7 @@ static int uas_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_id *id) shost->can_queue = devinfo->qdepth -2 ;usb_set_intfdata (intf, shost); - result =scsi_add_host (shost, &intf->dev); + result =scsi_add_host_with_dma (shost, &intf->dev, udev->bus->sysdev);if (result) goto free_streams;drivers/usb/storage/usb.c +3
-2@@ -1049,8 +1049,9 @@ int usb_stor_probe2(struct us_data *us) goto BadDevice;usb_autopm_get_interface_no_resume (us->pusb_intf);snprintf (us->scsi_name,sizeof (us->scsi_name),"usb-storage %s" , -dev_name (&us->pusb_intf->dev)); - result =scsi_add_host (us_to_host (us), dev); +dev_name (dev)); + result =scsi_add_host_with_dma (us_to_host (us), dev, + us->pusb_dev->bus->sysdev);if (result) {dev_warn (dev,"Unable to add the scsi host\n" );Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
These changes look fine.
However, usb-storage and uas are two separate drivers. Could you split the patch into two, one containing the changes to usb.c and scsiglue.c (those are part of usb-storage) and the other containing the changes to uas.c?
Alan Stern
PATCH v6 1/3 usb-storage: fix sdev->host->dma_dev
Use scsi_add_host_with_dma() instead of scsi_add_host().
When the scsi request queue is initialized/allocated, hw_max_sectors is clamped to the dma max mapping size. Therefore, the correct device that should be used for the clamping needs to be set.
The same clamping is still needed in usb-storage as hw_max_sectors could be changed there. The original clamping would be invalidated in such cases.
---
v2: fix commit message line length; bump hw_max_sectors to 2048 for SS UAS drives; split the "fallback" hw_max_sectors setting into another patch
v3: use a different approach: fix the dma_dev instead
v4: add the changelog of the patch series
v5: fix changelog line length
v6: split dma_dev fix for usb-storage and uas
drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c | 2 +- drivers/usb/storage/usb.c | 5 +++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c +1 -1
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static int slave_alloc (struct scsi_device *sdev)static int slave_configure (struct scsi_device *sdev) {struct us_data *us =host_to_us (sdev->host); -struct device *dev = us->pusb_dev->bus->sysdev; +struct device *dev = sdev->host->dma_dev;/* * Many devices have trouble transferring more than 32KB at a time,
drivers/usb/storage/usb.c +3 -2
@@ -1049,8 +1049,9 @@ int usb_stor_probe2(struct us_data *us) goto BadDevice;usb_autopm_get_interface_no_resume (us->pusb_intf);snprintf (us->scsi_name,sizeof (us->scsi_name),"usb-storage %s" , -dev_name (&us->pusb_intf->dev)); - result =scsi_add_host (us_to_host (us), dev); +dev_name (dev)); + result =scsi_add_host_with_dma (us_to_host (us), dev, + us->pusb_dev->bus->sysdev);if (result) {dev_warn (dev,"Unable to add the scsi host\n" );
Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
PATCH v6 2/3 uas: fix sdev->host->dma_dev
Use scsi_add_host_with_dma() instead of scsi_add_host().
When the scsi request queue is initialized/allocated, hw_max_sectors is clamped to the dma max mapping size. Therefore, the correct device that should be used for the clamping needs to be set.
The same clamping is still needed in uas as hw_max_sectors could be changed there. The original clamping would be invalidated in such cases.
--- drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 17 +++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +11 -6
@@ -827,17 +827,22 @@ static int uas_slave_alloc(struct scsi_device *sdev)*/ blk_queue_update_dma_alignment (sdev->request_queue, (512 -1 )); -if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ) -blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); -else if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240 ) -blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); -return 0 ; }static int uas_slave_configure (struct scsi_device *sdev) {struct uas_dev_info *devinfo = sdev->hostdata; +struct device *dev = sdev->host->dma_dev; + +if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); +else if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240 ) +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,240 ); + +blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue, +min_t (size_t,queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue), +dma_max_mapping_size (dev) >>SECTOR_SHIFT ));if (devinfo->flags &US_FL_NO_REPORT_OPCODES ) sdev->no_report_opcodes =1 ;
@@ -1023,7 +1028,7 @@ static int uas_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_id *id) shost->can_queue = devinfo->qdepth -2 ;usb_set_intfdata (intf, shost); - result =scsi_add_host (shost, &intf->dev); + result =scsi_add_host_with_dma (shost, &intf->dev, udev->bus->sysdev);if (result) goto free_streams;
Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
PATCH v6 3/3 uas: bump hw_max_sectors to 2048 blocks for SS or faster drives
In reply to Tom YanThere's no reason for uas to use a smaller value of max_sectors than usb-storage.
--- drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c +2 -0
@@ -839,6 +839,8 @@ static int uas_slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev)blk_queue_max_hw_sectors (sdev->request_queue,64 ); else if (devinfo->flags & US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_240) blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue, 240); + else if (devinfo->udev->speed >= USB_SPEED_SUPER) + blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue, 2048); blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue, min_t(size_t, queue_max_hw_sectors(sdev->request_queue),
Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] usb-storage: fix sdev->host->dma_dev
In reply to Tom YanQuoted 52 lines · Tom Yan
Use
scsi_add_host_with_dma()instead ofscsi_add_host().When the scsi request queue is initialized/allocated,
hw_max_sectorsis clamped to the dma max mapping size. Therefore, the correct device that should be used for the clamping needs to be set.The same clamping is still needed in usb-storage as
hw_max_sectorscould be changed there. The original clamping would be invalidated in such cases.Signed-off-by Tom Yan <[email protected]>---
v2: fix commit message line length; bumphw_max_sectorsto 2048 for SS UAS drives; split the "fallback"hw_max_sectorssetting into another patch
v3: use a different approach: fix thedma_devinstead
v4: add the changelog of the patch series
v5: fix changelog line length
v6: splitdma_devfix for usb-storage and uasdrivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c | 2 +- drivers/usb/storage/usb.c | 5 +++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c +1
-1@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static int slave_alloc (struct scsi_device *sdev)static int slave_configure (struct scsi_device *sdev) {struct us_data *us =host_to_us (sdev->host); -struct device *dev = us->pusb_dev->bus->sysdev; +struct device *dev = sdev->host->dma_dev;/* * Many devices have trouble transferring more than 32KB at a time, drivers/usb/storage/usb.c +3
-2@@ -1049,8 +1049,9 @@ int usb_stor_probe2(struct us_data *us) goto BadDevice;usb_autopm_get_interface_no_resume (us->pusb_intf);snprintf (us->scsi_name,sizeof (us->scsi_name),"usb-storage %s" , -dev_name (&us->pusb_intf->dev)); - result =scsi_add_host (us_to_host (us), dev); +dev_name (dev)); + result =scsi_add_host_with_dma (us_to_host (us), dev, + us->pusb_dev->bus->sysdev);if (result) {dev_warn (dev,"Unable to add the scsi host\n" );Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
For all three patches: