arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Remove clock for bluetooth on SC7180 IDP board
Subsystems (5)
PATCH RESEND 1/1 arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Remove clock for bluetooth on SC7180 IDP board
Removed voting for RPMH_RF_CLK2 which is not required as it is getting managed by BT SoC through SW_CTRL line.
--- arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts +0 -1
@@ -348,7 +348,6 @@ vddrf-supply = <&vreg_l2c_1p3>; vddch0-supply = <&vreg_l10c_3p3>; max-speed = <3200000>; - clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_RF_CLK2>; }; };
Signature · 2 lines
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Marcel Holtmann
maintainerHi,
Quoted 13 lines
Removed voting for
RPMH_RF_CLK2which is not required as it is getting managed by BT SoC throughSW_CTRLline.Signed-off-by Venkata Lakshmi Narayana Gubba <[email protected]>---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts| 1 -1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts +0
-0
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts line 352
Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts +0
-1@@ -348,7 +348,6 @@ vddrf-supply = <&vreg_l2c_1p3>; vddch0-supply = <&vreg_l10c_3p3>; max-speed = <3200000>; - clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_RF_CLK2>; }; };
is anybody picking up this patch or should I take it through the bluetooth-next tree?
Regards
Marcel
Quoted 2 lines · Marcel Holtmann
Hi,
Hi Marcel,
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Removed voting for
RPMH_RF_CLK2which is not required as it is getting managed by BT SoC throughSW_CTRLline.Signed-off-by Venkata Lakshmi Narayana Gubba <[email protected]>---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts| 1 -1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
Quoted 14 lines
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts line 352
Quoted 11 lines
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts +0
-1@@ -348,7 +348,6 @@ vddrf-supply = <&vreg_l2c_1p3>; vddch0-supply = <&vreg_l10c_3p3>; max-speed = <3200000>; - clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_RF_CLK2>; }; };is anybody picking up this patch or should I take it through the bluetooth-next tree?
I've now picked it through the qcom tree.
Thanks,
Bjorn