intel-pinctrl for 5.9-2
Hi Linus,
One fix for v5.9 cycle from Hans.
Thanks,
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
The following changes since commit f4d51dffc6c01a9e94650d95ce0104964f8ae822:
Linux 5.9-rc4 (2020-09-06 17:11:40 -0700)
are available in the Git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pinctrl/intel.git tags/intel-pinctrl-v5.9-2
for you to fetch changes up to 3488737093e7f60c7764b9a3cc66648adcbddca4:
pinctrl: cherryview: Preserve CHV_PADCTRL1_INVRXTX_TXDATA flag on GPIOs (2020-09-07 11:56:43 +0300)
----------------------------------------------------------------
intel-pinctrl for v5.9-2
* Preserve Tx buffer inversion on Cherriview GPIOs
The following is an automated git shortlog grouped by driver:
cherryview:
- Preserve CHV_PADCTRL1_INVRXTX_TXDATA flag on GPIOs
----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans de Goede (1):
pinctrl: cherryview: Preserve CHV_PADCTRL1_INVRXTX_TXDATA flag on GPIOs
drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-cherryview.c | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Signature · 2 lines
With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Quoted 1 line · Andy Shevchenko
One fix for v5.9 cycle from Hans.
Hm the pinctrl fixes are based on v5.9-rc2 and I got a ton of changes with this so I suppose it is based on some other -rc.
I will attempt to just cherry-pick it to fixes.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Quoted 10 lines · Linus Walleij
Quoted 1 line · Andy Shevchenko
One fix for v5.9 cycle from Hans.
Hm the pinctrl fixes are based on v5.9-rc2 and I got a ton of changes with this so I suppose it is based on some other -rc.
I will attempt to just cherry-pick it to fixes.
It will break fast forward. Is it a problem to have v5.9-rc4 there?
Signature · 2 lines
With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Quoted 5 lines · Andy Shevchenko
Quoted 4 lines · Linus Walleij
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 5:57 PM Andy Shevchenko
<[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
One fix for v5.9 cycle from Hans.
Hm the pinctrl fixes are based on v5.9-rc2 and I got a ton of changes with this so I suppose it is based on some other -rc.
I will attempt to just cherry-pick it to fixes.
It will break fast forward. Is it a problem to have v5.9-rc4 there?
Not really other than it is kludgy to merge it in, but is it a problem that I just cherry-picked it and signed it off instead? Is something built on top of it since you're concerned about fast-forwarding?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Quoted 13 lines · Linus Walleij
Quoted 10 lines · Andy Shevchenko
Quoted 9 lines · Linus Walleij
Quoted 1 line · Andy Shevchenko
One fix for v5.9 cycle from Hans.
Hm the pinctrl fixes are based on v5.9-rc2 and I got a ton of changes with this so I suppose it is based on some other -rc.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
I will attempt to just cherry-pick it to fixes.
It will break fast forward. Is it a problem to have v5.9-rc4 there?
Not really other than it is kludgy to merge it in, but is it a problem that I just cherry-picked it and signed it off instead? Is something built on top of it since you're concerned about fast-forwarding?
I rethought the scenario and I guess it should be fine. Please, go ahead with cherry picking (it's only one commit anyway).
Thanks!
Signature · 2 lines
With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko