Qemu SEV-ES guest support
v3 cover Qemu SEV-ES guest support
From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
This patch series provides support for launching an SEV-ES guest.
Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State (SEV-ES) expands on the SEV support to protect the guest register state from the hypervisor. See "AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Volume 2: System Programming", section "15.35 Encrypted State (SEV-ES)" [1].
In order to allow a hypervisor to perform functions on behalf of a guest, there is architectural support for notifying a guest's operating system when certain types of VMEXITs are about to occur. This allows the guest to selectively share information with the hypervisor to satisfy the requested function. The notification is performed using a new exception, the VMM Communication exception (#VC). The information is shared through the Guest-Hypervisor Communication Block (GHCB) using the VMGEXIT instruction. The GHCB format and the protocol for using it is documented in "SEV-ES Guest-Hypervisor Communication Block Standardization" [2].
The main areas of the Qemu code that are updated to support SEV-ES are around the SEV guest launch process and AP booting in order to support booting multiple vCPUs.
There are no new command line switches required. Instead, the desire for SEV-ES is presented using the SEV policy object. Bit 2 of the SEV policy object indicates that SEV-ES is required.
The SEV launch process is updated in two ways. The first is that a the KVM_SEV_ES_INIT ioctl is used to initialize the guest instead of the standard KVM_SEV_INIT ioctl. The second is that before the SEV launch measurement is calculated, the LAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSA SEV API is invoked for each vCPU that Qemu has created. Once the LAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSA API has been invoked, no direct changes to the guest register state can be made.
AP booting poses some interesting challenges. The INIT-SIPI-SIPI sequence is typically used to boot the APs. However, the hypervisor is not allowed to update the guest registers. For the APs, the reset vector must be known in advance. An OVMF method to provide a known reset vector address exists by providing an SEV information block, identified by UUID, near the end of the firmware [3]. OVMF will program the jump to the actual reset vector in this area of memory. Since the memory location is known in advance, an AP can be created with the known reset vector address as its starting CS:IP. The GHCB document [2] talks about how SMP booting under SEV-ES is performed. SEV-ES also requires the use of the in-kernel irqchip support in order to minimize the changes required to Qemu to support AP booting.
[1] https://www.amd.com/system/files/TechDocs/24593.pdf
[2] https://developer.amd.com/wp-content/resources/56421.pdf
[3] 30937f2f98c4 ("OvmfPkg: Use the SEV-ES work area for the SEV-ES AP reset vector")
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/commit/30937f2f98c42496f2f143fe8374ae7f7e684847
---
These patches are based on commit:d0ed6a69d3 ("Update version for v5.1.0 release")
(I tried basing on the latest Qemu commit, but I was having build issues that level)
A version of the tree can be found at:
https://github.com/AMDESE/qemu/tree/sev-es-v11
Changes since v2:
- Add in-kernel irqchip requirement for SEV-ES guests
Changes since v1:
- Fixed checkpatch.pl errors/warnings
Tom Lendacky (5):
sev/i386: Add initial support for SEV-ES
sev/i386: Require in-kernel irqchip support for SEV-ES guests sev/i386: Allow AP booting under SEV-ES
sev/i386: Don't allow a system reset under an SEV-ES guest sev/i386: Enable an SEV-ES guest based on SEV policy
accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ accel/stubs/kvm-stub.c | 5 ++ hw/i386/pc_sysfw.c | 10 +++- include/sysemu/cpus.h | 2 + include/sysemu/hw_accel.h | 5 ++ include/sysemu/kvm.h | 18 +++++++ include/sysemu/sev.h | 3 ++ softmmu/cpus.c | 5 ++ softmmu/vl.c | 5 +- target/i386/cpu.c | 1 + target/i386/kvm.c | 2 + target/i386/sev-stub.c | 5 ++ target/i386/sev.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- target/i386/sev_i386.h | 1 + 14 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
PATCH v3 1/5 sev/i386: Add initial support for SEV-ES
From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
Provide initial support for SEV-ES. This includes creating a function to indicate the guest is an SEV-ES guest (which will return false until all support is in place), performing the proper SEV initialization and ensuring that the guest CPU state is measured as part of the launch.
--- target/i386/cpu.c | 1 + target/i386/sev-stub.c | 5 +++++ target/i386/sev.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- target/i386/sev_i386.h | 1 + 4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
target/i386/cpu.c +1 -0
@@ -5969,6 +5969,7 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count,break ;case 0x8000001F : *eax =sev_enabled () ?0x2 :0 ; + *eax |=sev_es_enabled () ?0x8 :0 ; *ebx =sev_get_cbit_position (); *ebx |=sev_get_reduced_phys_bits () <<6 ; *ecx =0 ;
target/i386/sev-stub.c +5 -0
@@ -49,3 +49,8 @@ SevCapability *sev_get_capabilities(Error **errp)error_setg (errp,"SEV is not available in this QEMU" );return NULL ; } + +bool sev_es_enabled (void ) +{ +return false; +}
target/i386/sev.c +44 -2
77 lines not on this page · raw message
target/i386/sev_i386.h +1 -0
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@#define SEV_POLICY_SEV 0x20extern bool sev_enabled (void ); +extern bool sev_es_enabled (void );extern uint64_t sev_get_me_mask (void );extern SevInfo *sev_get_info (void );extern uint32_t sev_get_cbit_position (void );
Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] sev/i386: Add initial support for SEV-ES
Quoted 22 lines · * Tom Lendacky ([email protected]) wrote:
From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
Provide initial support for SEV-ES. This includes creating a function to indicate the guest is an SEV-ES guest (which will return false until all support is in place), performing the proper SEV initialization and ensuring that the guest CPU state is measured as part of the launch.
Co-developed-by Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>--- target/i386/cpu.c | 1 + target/i386/sev-stub.c | 5 +++++ target/i386/sev.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- target/i386/sev_i386.h | 1 + 4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)target/i386/cpu.c +0
-0
target/i386/cpu.c void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count, · line 5972
Quoted 4 lines
target/i386/cpu.c +1
-0@@ -5969,6 +5969,7 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count,break ;case 0x8000001F : *eax =sev_enabled () ?0x2 :0 ; + *eax |=sev_es_enabled () ?0x8 :0 ;
If that also came from a nicely defined constant it would be great.
Other than that;
Quoted 117 lines
target/i386/cpu.c +0
-0*ebx =sev_get_cbit_position (); *ebx |=sev_get_reduced_phys_bits () <<6 ; *ecx =0 ;target/i386/sev-stub.c +5
-0@@ -49,3 +49,8 @@ SevCapability *sev_get_capabilities(Error **errp)error_setg (errp,"SEV is not available in this QEMU" );return NULL ; } + +bool sev_es_enabled (void ) +{ +return false; +}target/i386/sev.c +44
-2@@ -359,6 +359,12 @@ sev_enabled(void)return !!sev_guest; } +bool +sev_es_enabled (void ) +{ +return false; +} +uint64_t sev_get_me_mask (void ) {@@ -578,6 +584,22 @@ sev_launch_update_data(SevGuestState *sev, uint8_t *addr, uint64_t len)return ret; } +static int +sev_launch_update_vmsa (SevGuestState *sev) +{ +int ret, fw_error; + + ret =sev_ioctl (sev->sev_fd,KVM_SEV_LAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSA ,NULL , &fw_error); +if (ret) { +error_report ("%s: LAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSA ret=%d fw_error=%d '%s'" , + __func__, ret, fw_error,fw_error_to_str (fw_error)); + goto err; + } + +err: +return ret; +} +static void sev_launch_get_measure (Notifier *notifier,void *unused) {@@ -590,6 +612,14 @@ sev_launch_get_measure(Notifier *notifier, void *unused)return ; } +if (sev_es_enabled ()) { +/* measure all the VM save areas before getting launch_measure */ + ret =sev_launch_update_vmsa (sev); +if (ret) { +exit (1 ); + } + } + measurement = g_new0(struct kvm_sev_launch_measure, 1);/* query the measurement blob length */ @@ -684,7 +714,7 @@ sev_guest_init(const char *id) {SevGuestState *sev;char *devname; -int ret, fw_error; +int ret, fw_error, cmd;uint32_t ebx;uint32_t host_cbitpos;struct sev_user_data_status status = {};@@ -745,8 +775,20 @@ sev_guest_init(const char *id) sev->api_major = status.api_major; sev->api_minor = status.api_minor; +if (sev_es_enabled ()) { +if (!(status.flags &SEV_STATUS_FLAGS_CONFIG_ES )) { +error_report ("%s: guest policy requires SEV-ES, but " +"host SEV-ES support unavailable" , + __func__); + goto err; + } + cmd =KVM_SEV_ES_INIT ; + }else { + cmd =KVM_SEV_INIT ; + } +trace_kvm_sev_init (); - ret =sev_ioctl (sev->sev_fd,KVM_SEV_INIT ,NULL , &fw_error); + ret =sev_ioctl (sev->sev_fd, cmd,NULL , &fw_error);if (ret) {error_report ("%s: failed to initialize ret=%d fw_error=%d '%s'" , __func__, ret, fw_error,fw_error_to_str (fw_error));target/i386/sev_i386.h +1
-0@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@#define SEV_POLICY_SEV 0x20extern bool sev_enabled (void ); +extern bool sev_es_enabled (void );extern uint64_t sev_get_me_mask (void );extern SevInfo *sev_get_info (void );extern uint32_t sev_get_cbit_position (void );Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Signature · 1 line
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / [email protected] / Manchester, UK
Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] sev/i386: Add initial support for SEV-ES
In reply to Tom LendackyQuoted 63 lines · Tom Lendacky
From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
Provide initial support for SEV-ES. This includes creating a function to indicate the guest is an SEV-ES guest (which will return false until all support is in place), performing the proper SEV initialization and ensuring that the guest CPU state is measured as part of the launch.
Co-developed-by Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>--- target/i386/cpu.c | 1 + target/i386/sev-stub.c | 5 +++++ target/i386/sev.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- target/i386/sev_i386.h | 1 + 4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)target/i386/cpu.c +1
-0@@ -5969,6 +5969,7 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count,break ;case 0x8000001F : *eax =sev_enabled () ?0x2 :0 ; + *eax |=sev_es_enabled () ?0x8 :0 ; *ebx =sev_get_cbit_position (); *ebx |=sev_get_reduced_phys_bits () <<6 ; *ecx =0 ;target/i386/sev-stub.c +5
-0@@ -49,3 +49,8 @@ SevCapability *sev_get_capabilities(Error **errp)error_setg (errp,"SEV is not available in this QEMU" );return NULL ; } + +bool sev_es_enabled (void ) +{ +return false; +}target/i386/sev.c +6
-0@@ -359,6 +359,12 @@ sev_enabled(void)return !!sev_guest; } +bool +sev_es_enabled (void ) +{ +return false; +} +uint64_t sev_get_me_mask (void ) {@@ -578,6 +584,22 @@ sev_launch_update_data(SevGuestState *sev, uint8_t *addr, uint64_t len)return ret; }
target/i386/sev.c sev_launch_update_data(SevGuestState *sev, uint8_t *addr, uint64_t len) · line 596
Quoted 10 lines
target/i386/sev.c +10
-0+static int +sev_launch_update_vmsa (SevGuestState *sev) +{ +int ret, fw_error; + + ret =sev_ioctl (sev->sev_fd,KVM_SEV_LAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSA ,NULL , &fw_error); +if (ret) { +error_report ("%s: LAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSA ret=%d fw_error=%d '%s'" , + __func__, ret, fw_error,fw_error_to_str (fw_error)); + goto err;
goto (and the err: label) is not needed.
Quoted 10 lines
target/i386/sev.c +6
-0+ } + +err: +return ret; +} +static void sev_launch_get_measure (Notifier *notifier,void *unused) {
target/i386/sev.c sev_launch_get_measure(Notifier *notifier, void *unused) · line 619
Quoted 8 lines
target/i386/sev.c +5
-0@@ -590,6 +612,14 @@ sev_launch_get_measure(Notifier *notifier, void *unused)return ; } +if (sev_es_enabled ()) { +/* measure all the VM save areas before getting launch_measure */ + ret =sev_launch_update_vmsa (sev); +if (ret) { +exit (1 );
Other error cases in this function just return on error. Why quit QEMU here?
Quoted 50 lines
target/i386/sev.c +17
-2+ } + } + measurement = g_new0(struct kvm_sev_launch_measure, 1);/* query the measurement blob length */ @@ -684,7 +714,7 @@ sev_guest_init(const char *id) {SevGuestState *sev;char *devname; -int ret, fw_error; +int ret, fw_error, cmd;uint32_t ebx;uint32_t host_cbitpos;struct sev_user_data_status status = {};@@ -745,8 +775,20 @@ sev_guest_init(const char *id) sev->api_major = status.api_major; sev->api_minor = status.api_minor; +if (sev_es_enabled ()) { +if (!(status.flags &SEV_STATUS_FLAGS_CONFIG_ES )) { +error_report ("%s: guest policy requires SEV-ES, but " +"host SEV-ES support unavailable" , + __func__); + goto err; + } + cmd =KVM_SEV_ES_INIT ; + }else { + cmd =KVM_SEV_INIT ; + } +trace_kvm_sev_init (); - ret =sev_ioctl (sev->sev_fd,KVM_SEV_INIT ,NULL , &fw_error); + ret =sev_ioctl (sev->sev_fd, cmd,NULL , &fw_error);if (ret) {error_report ("%s: failed to initialize ret=%d fw_error=%d '%s'" , __func__, ret, fw_error,fw_error_to_str (fw_error));target/i386/sev_i386.h +1
-0@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@#define SEV_POLICY_SEV 0x20extern bool sev_enabled (void ); +extern bool sev_es_enabled (void );extern uint64_t sev_get_me_mask (void );extern SevInfo *sev_get_info (void );extern uint32_t sev_get_cbit_position (void );
Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] sev/i386: Add initial support for SEV-ES
Quoted 66 lines · Dov Murik
Quoted 65 lines · Tom Lendacky
From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
Provide initial support for SEV-ES. This includes creating a function to indicate the guest is an SEV-ES guest (which will return false until all support is in place), performing the proper SEV initialization and ensuring that the guest CPU state is measured as part of the launch.
Co-developed-by Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>---
target/i386/cpu.c | 1 +
target/i386/sev-stub.c| 5 +++++
target/i386/sev.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--target/i386/sev_i386.h| 1 +4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)target/i386/cpu.c +0
-0@@ -5969,6 +5969,7 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count, break;case
0x8000001F:
*eax =sev_enabled()?0x2: 0;
+ *eax |=sev_es_enabled()?0x8: 0; *ebx =sev_get_cbit_position(); *ebx |=sev_get_reduced_phys_bits()<< 6; *ecx = 0;target/i386/sev-stub.c +5
-0@@ -49,3 +49,8 @@ SevCapability *sev_get_capabilities(Error **errp) error_setg(errp, "SEV is not available in this QEMU"); return NULL; } + +bool sev_es_enabled (void ) +{ + return false; +}target/i386/sev.c +6
-0@@ -359,6 +359,12 @@ sev_enabled(void) return !!sev_guest; } +bool +sev_es_enabled (void ) +{ + return false; +} +
uint64_t
sev_get_me_mask(void)
{target/i386/sev.c +0
-0@@ -578,6 +584,22 @@ sev_launch_update_data(SevGuestState *sev, uint8_t *addr, uint64_t len) return ret; }
Quoted 13 lines
target/i386/sev.c sev_launch_update_data(SevGuestState *sev, uint8_t *addr, uint64_t len) · line 596
Quoted 11 lines
target/i386/sev.c +10
-0+static int +sev_launch_update_vmsa (SevGuestState *sev) +{ + int ret, fw_error; + + ret = sev_ioctl(sev->sev_fd, KVM_SEV_LAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSA, NULL, &fw_error); + if (ret) { + error_report("%s: LAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSA ret=%d fw_error=%d '%s'", + __func__, ret, fw_error, fw_error_to_str(fw_error)); + goto err;goto (and the err: label) is not needed.
Yup, will remove both.
Quoted 15 lines
Quoted 15 lines
target/i386/sev.c +6
-0+ } + +err: + return ret; +} +static void
sev_launch_get_measure(Notifier *notifier, void *unused){target/i386/sev.c +0
-0@@ -590,6 +612,14 @@ sev_launch_get_measure(Notifier *notifier, void *unused) return; }
Quoted 7 lines
target/i386/sev.c sev_launch_get_measure(Notifier *notifier, void *unused) · line 619
Quoted 5 lines
target/i386/sev.c +5
-0+ if (sev_es_enabled()) { + /* measure all the VM save areas before getting launch_measure */ + ret = sev_launch_update_vmsa(sev); + if (ret) { + exit(1);Other error cases in this function just return on error. Why quit QEMU here?
This is inside an void return function so an error can't be returned. It matches what happens if sev_launch_finish() fails. To that end, a LAUNCH_MEASURE error should probably exit(), also.
Thanks,
Tom
Quoted 51 lines
Quoted 51 lines
target/i386/sev.c +3
-0+ } + } + measurement = g_new0(struct kvm_sev_launch_measure, 1);/* query the measurement blob length */
target/i386/sev.c +14
-2@@ -684,7 +714,7 @@ sev_guest_init(const char *id) { SevGuestState *sev; char *devname; - int ret, fw_error; + int ret, fw_error, cmd; uint32_t ebx; uint32_t host_cbitpos; struct sev_user_data_status status = {};@@ -745,8 +775,20 @@ sev_guest_init(const char *id) sev->api_major = status.api_major; sev->api_minor = status.api_minor; + if (sev_es_enabled()) { + if (!(status.flags & SEV_STATUS_FLAGS_CONFIG_ES)) { + error_report("%s: guest policy requires SEV-ES, but " + "host SEV-ES support unavailable", + __func__); + goto err; + } + cmd = KVM_SEV_ES_INIT; + } else { + cmd = KVM_SEV_INIT; + } + trace_kvm_sev_init(); - ret = sev_ioctl(sev->sev_fd, KVM_SEV_INIT, NULL, &fw_error); + ret = sev_ioctl(sev->sev_fd, cmd, NULL, &fw_error); if (ret) { error_report("%s: failed to initialize ret=%d fw_error=%d '%s'", __func__, ret, fw_error, fw_error_to_str(fw_error));target/i386/sev_i386.h +1
-0@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ #define SEV_POLICY_SEV 0x20 extern bool sev_enabled(void); +extern bool sev_es_enabled (void ); extern uint64_t sev_get_me_mask(void); extern SevInfo *sev_get_info(void); extern uint32_t sev_get_cbit_position(void);
PATCH v3 2/5 sev/i386: Require in-kernel irqchip support for SEV-ES guests
In reply to Tom LendackyFrom: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
In prep for AP booting, require the use of in-kernel irqchip support. This lessens the Qemu support burden required to boot APs.
--- target/i386/sev.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
target/i386/sev.c +6 -0
@@ -776,6 +776,12 @@ sev_guest_init(const char *id) sev->api_minor = status.api_minor;if (sev_es_enabled ()) { +if (!kvm_kernel_irqchip_allowed ()) { +error_report ("%s: SEV-ES guests require in-kernel irqchip support" , + __func__); + goto err; + } +if (!(status.flags &SEV_STATUS_FLAGS_CONFIG_ES )) { error_report("%s: guest policy requires SEV-ES, but " "host SEV-ES support unavailable",
Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
PATCH v3 3/5 sev/i386: Allow AP booting under SEV-ES
In reply to Tom LendackyFrom: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
When SEV-ES is enabled, it is not possible modify the guests register state after it has been initially created, encrypted and measured.
Normally, an INIT-SIPI-SIPI request is used to boot the AP. However, the hypervisor cannot emulate this because it cannot update the AP register state. For the very first boot by an AP, the reset vector CS segment value and the EIP value must be programmed before the register has been encrypted and measured.
--- accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ accel/stubs/kvm-stub.c | 5 ++++ hw/i386/pc_sysfw.c | 10 ++++++- include/sysemu/kvm.h | 16 +++++++++++ include/sysemu/sev.h | 3 ++ target/i386/kvm.c | 2 ++ target/i386/sev.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 7 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
accel/kvm/kvm-all.c +64 -0
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@#include "qemu/main-loop.h" #include "trace.h" #include "hw/irq.h" +#include "sysemu/kvm.h" #include "sysemu/sev.h" #include "qapi/visitor.h" #include "qapi/qapi-types-common.h"
@@ -120,6 +121,12 @@ struct KVMState/* memory encryption */ void *memcrypt_handle;int (*memcrypt_encrypt_data)(void *handle,uint8_t *ptr,uint64_t len); +int (*memcrypt_save_reset_vector)(void *handle,void *flash_ptr, +uint64_t flash_size,uint32_t *addr); + +unsigned int reset_cs; +unsigned int reset_ip; +bool reset_valid;/* For "info mtree -f" to tell if an MR is registered in KVM */ int nr_as;
@@ -239,6 +246,62 @@ int kvm_memcrypt_encrypt_data(uint8_t *ptr, uint64_t len)return 1 ; } +void kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector (CPUState *cpu) +{ +X86CPU *x86; +CPUX86State *env; + +/* Only update if we have valid reset information */ +if (!kvm_state->reset_valid) { +return ; + } + +/* Do not update the BSP reset state */ +if (cpu->cpu_index ==0 ) { +return ; + } + + x86 =X86_CPU (cpu); + env = &x86->env; + +cpu_x86_load_seg_cache (env,R_CS ,0xf000 , kvm_state->reset_cs,0xffff , +DESC_P_MASK |DESC_S_MASK |DESC_CS_MASK | +DESC_R_MASK |DESC_A_MASK ); + + env->eip = kvm_state->reset_ip; +} + +int kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector (void *flash_ptr,uint64_t flash_size) +{ +CPUState *cpu; +uint32_t addr; +int ret; + +if (kvm_memcrypt_enabled () && + kvm_state->memcrypt_save_reset_vector) { + + addr =0 ; + ret = kvm_state->memcrypt_save_reset_vector (kvm_state->memcrypt_handle, + flash_ptr, flash_size, + &addr); +if (ret) { +return ret; + } + +if (addr) { + kvm_state->reset_cs = addr &0xffff0000 ; + kvm_state->reset_ip = addr &0x0000ffff ; + kvm_state->reset_valid = true; + +CPU_FOREACH (cpu) { +kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector (cpu); + } + } + } + +return 0 ; +} +/* Called with KVMMemoryListener.slots_lock held */ static KVMSlot *kvm_get_free_slot (KVMMemoryListener *kml) {
@@ -2193,6 +2256,7 @@ static int kvm_init(MachineState *ms) } kvm_state->memcrypt_encrypt_data = sev_encrypt_data; + kvm_state->memcrypt_save_reset_vector = sev_es_save_reset_vector; } ret =kvm_arch_init (ms, s);
accel/stubs/kvm-stub.c +5 -0
@@ -114,6 +114,11 @@ int kvm_memcrypt_encrypt_data(uint8_t *ptr, uint64_t len)return 1 ; } +int kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector (void *flash_ptr,uint64_t flash_size) +{ +return -ENOSYS ; +} +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY int kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route (KVMState *s,int vector,PCIDevice *dev) {
hw/i386/pc_sysfw.c +9 -1
@@ -156,7 +156,8 @@ static void pc_system_flash_map(PCMachineState *pcms,PFlashCFI01 *system_flash;MemoryRegion *flash_mem;void *flash_ptr; -int ret, flash_size; +uint64_t flash_size; +int ret;assert (PC_MACHINE_GET_CLASS (pcms)->pci_enabled);
@@ -204,6 +205,13 @@ static void pc_system_flash_map(PCMachineState *pcms,if (kvm_memcrypt_enabled ()) { flash_ptr =memory_region_get_ram_ptr (flash_mem); flash_size =memory_region_size (flash_mem); + + ret =kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector (flash_ptr, flash_size); +if (ret) { +error_report ("failed to locate and/or save reset vector" ); +exit (1 ); + } + ret =kvm_memcrypt_encrypt_data (flash_ptr, flash_size);if (ret) {error_report ("failed to encrypt pflash rom" );
include/sysemu/kvm.h +16 -0
@@ -247,6 +247,22 @@ bool kvm_memcrypt_enabled(void);*/ int kvm_memcrypt_encrypt_data (uint8_t *ptr,uint64_t len); +/** +* kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector - sets the CS/IP value for the AP if SEV-ES +* is active. +*/ +void kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector (CPUState *cpu); + +/** +* kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector - locates and saves the reset vector to be +* used as the initial CS/IP value for APs +* if SEV-ES is active. +* +* Return: 1 SEV-ES is active and failed to locate a valid reset vector +* 0 SEV-ES is not active or successfully located and saved the +* reset vector address +*/ +int kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector (void *flash_prt,uint64_t flash_size);#ifdef NEED_CPU_H #include "cpu.h"
include/sysemu/sev.h +3 -0
@@ -18,4 +18,7 @@void *sev_guest_init (const char *id);int sev_encrypt_data (void *handle,uint8_t *ptr,uint64_t len); +int sev_es_save_reset_vector (void *handle,void *flash_ptr, +uint64_t flash_size,uint32_t *addr); +#endif
target/i386/kvm.c +2 -0
@@ -1912,6 +1912,8 @@ void kvm_arch_reset_vcpu(X86CPU *cpu) }/* enabled by default */ env->poll_control_msr =1 ; + +kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector (CPU (cpu)); }void kvm_arch_do_init_vcpu (X86CPU *cpu)
target/i386/sev.c +51 -0
63 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] sev/i386: Allow AP booting under SEV-ES
Hi Tom,
sorry for the random feedback -- I haven't followed (and don't really intend to follow) the QEMU side of the feature. Just one style idea:
Quoted 228 lines · Tom Lendacky
From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
When SEV-ES is enabled, it is not possible modify the guests register state after it has been initially created, encrypted and measured.
Normally, an INIT-SIPI-SIPI request is used to boot the AP. However, the hypervisor cannot emulate this because it cannot update the AP register state. For the very first boot by an AP, the reset vector CS segment value and the EIP value must be programmed before the register has been encrypted and measured.
Signed-off-by Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>--- accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ accel/stubs/kvm-stub.c | 5 ++++ hw/i386/pc_sysfw.c | 10 ++++++- include/sysemu/kvm.h | 16 +++++++++++ include/sysemu/sev.h | 3 ++ target/i386/kvm.c | 2 ++ target/i386/sev.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 7 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)accel/kvm/kvm-all.c +64
-0@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@#include "qemu/main-loop.h" #include "trace.h" #include "hw/irq.h" +#include "sysemu/kvm.h" #include "sysemu/sev.h" #include "qapi/visitor.h" #include "qapi/qapi-types-common.h" @@ -120,6 +121,12 @@ struct KVMState/* memory encryption */ void *memcrypt_handle;int (*memcrypt_encrypt_data)(void *handle,uint8_t *ptr,uint64_t len); +int (*memcrypt_save_reset_vector)(void *handle,void *flash_ptr, +uint64_t flash_size,uint32_t *addr); + +unsigned int reset_cs; +unsigned int reset_ip; +bool reset_valid;/* For "info mtree -f" to tell if an MR is registered in KVM */ int nr_as;@@ -239,6 +246,62 @@ int kvm_memcrypt_encrypt_data(uint8_t *ptr, uint64_t len)return 1 ; } +void kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector (CPUState *cpu) +{ +X86CPU *x86; +CPUX86State *env; + +/* Only update if we have valid reset information */ +if (!kvm_state->reset_valid) { +return ; + } + +/* Do not update the BSP reset state */ +if (cpu->cpu_index ==0 ) { +return ; + } + + x86 =X86_CPU (cpu); + env = &x86->env; + +cpu_x86_load_seg_cache (env,R_CS ,0xf000 , kvm_state->reset_cs,0xffff , +DESC_P_MASK |DESC_S_MASK |DESC_CS_MASK | +DESC_R_MASK |DESC_A_MASK ); + + env->eip = kvm_state->reset_ip; +} + +int kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector (void *flash_ptr,uint64_t flash_size) +{ +CPUState *cpu; +uint32_t addr; +int ret; + +if (kvm_memcrypt_enabled () && + kvm_state->memcrypt_save_reset_vector) { + + addr =0 ; + ret = kvm_state->memcrypt_save_reset_vector (kvm_state->memcrypt_handle, + flash_ptr, flash_size, + &addr); +if (ret) { +return ret; + } + +if (addr) { + kvm_state->reset_cs = addr &0xffff0000 ; + kvm_state->reset_ip = addr &0x0000ffff ; + kvm_state->reset_valid = true; + +CPU_FOREACH (cpu) { +kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector (cpu); + } + } + } + +return 0 ; +} +/* Called with KVMMemoryListener.slots_lock held */ static KVMSlot *kvm_get_free_slot (KVMMemoryListener *kml) {@@ -2193,6 +2256,7 @@ static int kvm_init(MachineState *ms) } kvm_state->memcrypt_encrypt_data = sev_encrypt_data; + kvm_state->memcrypt_save_reset_vector = sev_es_save_reset_vector; } ret =kvm_arch_init (ms, s);accel/stubs/kvm-stub.c +5
-0@@ -114,6 +114,11 @@ int kvm_memcrypt_encrypt_data(uint8_t *ptr, uint64_t len)return 1 ; } +int kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector (void *flash_ptr,uint64_t flash_size) +{ +return -ENOSYS ; +} +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY int kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route (KVMState *s,int vector,PCIDevice *dev) {hw/i386/pc_sysfw.c +9
-1@@ -156,7 +156,8 @@ static void pc_system_flash_map(PCMachineState *pcms,PFlashCFI01 *system_flash;MemoryRegion *flash_mem;void *flash_ptr; -int ret, flash_size; +uint64_t flash_size; +int ret;assert (PC_MACHINE_GET_CLASS (pcms)->pci_enabled);@@ -204,6 +205,13 @@ static void pc_system_flash_map(PCMachineState *pcms,if (kvm_memcrypt_enabled ()) { flash_ptr =memory_region_get_ram_ptr (flash_mem); flash_size =memory_region_size (flash_mem); + + ret =kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector (flash_ptr, flash_size); +if (ret) { +error_report ("failed to locate and/or save reset vector" ); +exit (1 ); + } + ret =kvm_memcrypt_encrypt_data (flash_ptr, flash_size);if (ret) {error_report ("failed to encrypt pflash rom" );include/sysemu/kvm.h +16
-0@@ -247,6 +247,22 @@ bool kvm_memcrypt_enabled(void);*/ int kvm_memcrypt_encrypt_data (uint8_t *ptr,uint64_t len); +/** +* kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector - sets the CS/IP value for the AP if SEV-ES +* is active. +*/ +void kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector (CPUState *cpu); + +/** +* kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector - locates and saves the reset vector to be +* used as the initial CS/IP value for APs +* if SEV-ES is active. +* +* Return: 1 SEV-ES is active and failed to locate a valid reset vector +* 0 SEV-ES is not active or successfully located and saved the +* reset vector address +*/ +int kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector (void *flash_prt,uint64_t flash_size);#ifdef NEED_CPU_H #include "cpu.h" include/sysemu/sev.h +3
-0@@ -18,4 +18,7 @@void *sev_guest_init (const char *id);int sev_encrypt_data (void *handle,uint8_t *ptr,uint64_t len); +int sev_es_save_reset_vector (void *handle,void *flash_ptr, +uint64_t flash_size,uint32_t *addr); +#endif target/i386/kvm.c +2
-0@@ -1912,6 +1912,8 @@ void kvm_arch_reset_vcpu(X86CPU *cpu) }/* enabled by default */ env->poll_control_msr =1 ; + +kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector (CPU (cpu)); }void kvm_arch_do_init_vcpu (X86CPU *cpu)target/i386/sev.c +6
-0@@ -70,6 +70,19 @@ struct SevGuestState {#define DEFAULT_GUEST_POLICY 0x1/* disable debug */ #define DEFAULT_SEV_DEVICE "/dev/sev" +/* SEV Information Block GUID = 00f771de-1a7e-4fcb-890e-68c77e2fb44e */ +#define SEV_INFO_BLOCK_GUID \ + "\xde\x71\xf7\x00\x7e\x1a\xcb\x4f\x89\x0e\x68\xc7\x7e\x2f\xb4\x4e" + +typedef struct __attribute__((__packed__)) SevInfoBlock { + /* SEV-ES Reset Vector Address */
target/i386/sev.c struct SevGuestState { · line 88
Quoted 10 lines
target/i386/sev.c +7
-0+uint32_t reset_addr; + +/* SEV Information Block size and GUID */ +uint16_t size; +char guid[16 ]; +} SevInfoBlock; +static SevGuestState *sev_guest;static Error *sev_mig_blocker;
Can we replace "char guid[16]" with "QemuUUID guid"?
Also, can we replace the SEV_INFO_BLOCK_GUID macro with a static const structure, initialized with UUID_LE()?
Something like
static const QemuUUID sev_info_block_guid_le = {
.data = UUID_LE(...)
};Thanks
Laszlo
Quoted 46 lines
target/i386/sev.c +38
-0@@ -833,6 +846,44 @@ sev_encrypt_data(void *handle, uint8_t *ptr, uint64_t len)return 0 ; } +int +sev_es_save_reset_vector (void *handle,void *flash_ptr,uint64_t flash_size, +uint32_t *addr) +{ +SevInfoBlock *info; + +assert (handle); + +/* +* Initialize the address to zero. An address of zero with a successful +* return code indicates that SEV-ES is not active. +*/ + *addr =0 ; +if (!sev_es_enabled ()) { +return 0 ; + } + +/* +* Extract the AP reset vector for SEV-ES guests by locating the SEV GUID. +* The SEV GUID is located 32 bytes from the end of the flash. Use this +* address to base the SEV information block. +*/ + info = flash_ptr + flash_size -0x20 -sizeof (*info); +if (memcmp (info->guid,SEV_INFO_BLOCK_GUID ,16 )) { +error_report ("SEV information block not found in pflash rom" ); +return 1 ; + } + +if (!info->reset_addr) { +error_report ("SEV-ES reset address is zero" ); +return 1 ; + } + + *addr = info->reset_addr; + +return 0 ; +} +static void sev_register_types (void ) {
Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] sev/i386: Allow AP booting under SEV-ES
Quoted 1 line · Laszlo Ersek
Hi Tom,
Hi Laszlo,
Quoted 246 lines
sorry for the random feedback -- I haven't followed (and don't really intend to follow) the QEMU side of the feature. Just one style idea:
Quoted 228 lines · Tom Lendacky
From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
When SEV-ES is enabled, it is not possible modify the guests register state after it has been initially created, encrypted and measured.
Normally, an INIT-SIPI-SIPI request is used to boot the AP. However, the hypervisor cannot emulate this because it cannot update the AP register state. For the very first boot by an AP, the reset vector CS segment value and the EIP value must be programmed before the register has been encrypted and measured.
Signed-off-by Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>--- accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ accel/stubs/kvm-stub.c | 5 ++++ hw/i386/pc_sysfw.c | 10 ++++++- include/sysemu/kvm.h | 16 +++++++++++ include/sysemu/sev.h | 3 ++ target/i386/kvm.c | 2 ++ target/i386/sev.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 7 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)accel/kvm/kvm-all.c +64
-0@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@#include "qemu/main-loop.h" #include "trace.h" #include "hw/irq.h" +#include "sysemu/kvm.h" #include "sysemu/sev.h" #include "qapi/visitor.h" #include "qapi/qapi-types-common.h" @@ -120,6 +121,12 @@ struct KVMState/* memory encryption */ void *memcrypt_handle;int (*memcrypt_encrypt_data)(void *handle,uint8_t *ptr,uint64_t len); +int (*memcrypt_save_reset_vector)(void *handle,void *flash_ptr, +uint64_t flash_size,uint32_t *addr); + +unsigned int reset_cs; +unsigned int reset_ip; +bool reset_valid;/* For "info mtree -f" to tell if an MR is registered in KVM */ int nr_as;@@ -239,6 +246,62 @@ int kvm_memcrypt_encrypt_data(uint8_t *ptr, uint64_t len)return 1 ; } +void kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector (CPUState *cpu) +{ +X86CPU *x86; +CPUX86State *env; + +/* Only update if we have valid reset information */ +if (!kvm_state->reset_valid) { +return ; + } + +/* Do not update the BSP reset state */ +if (cpu->cpu_index ==0 ) { +return ; + } + + x86 =X86_CPU (cpu); + env = &x86->env; + +cpu_x86_load_seg_cache (env,R_CS ,0xf000 , kvm_state->reset_cs,0xffff , +DESC_P_MASK |DESC_S_MASK |DESC_CS_MASK | +DESC_R_MASK |DESC_A_MASK ); + + env->eip = kvm_state->reset_ip; +} + +int kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector (void *flash_ptr,uint64_t flash_size) +{ +CPUState *cpu; +uint32_t addr; +int ret; + +if (kvm_memcrypt_enabled () && + kvm_state->memcrypt_save_reset_vector) { + + addr =0 ; + ret = kvm_state->memcrypt_save_reset_vector (kvm_state->memcrypt_handle, + flash_ptr, flash_size, + &addr); +if (ret) { +return ret; + } + +if (addr) { + kvm_state->reset_cs = addr &0xffff0000 ; + kvm_state->reset_ip = addr &0x0000ffff ; + kvm_state->reset_valid = true; + +CPU_FOREACH (cpu) { +kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector (cpu); + } + } + } + +return 0 ; +} +/* Called with KVMMemoryListener.slots_lock held */ static KVMSlot *kvm_get_free_slot (KVMMemoryListener *kml) {@@ -2193,6 +2256,7 @@ static int kvm_init(MachineState *ms) } kvm_state->memcrypt_encrypt_data = sev_encrypt_data; + kvm_state->memcrypt_save_reset_vector = sev_es_save_reset_vector; } ret =kvm_arch_init (ms, s);accel/stubs/kvm-stub.c +5
-0@@ -114,6 +114,11 @@ int kvm_memcrypt_encrypt_data(uint8_t *ptr, uint64_t len)return 1 ; } +int kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector (void *flash_ptr,uint64_t flash_size) +{ +return -ENOSYS ; +} +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY int kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route (KVMState *s,int vector,PCIDevice *dev) {hw/i386/pc_sysfw.c +9
-1@@ -156,7 +156,8 @@ static void pc_system_flash_map(PCMachineState *pcms,PFlashCFI01 *system_flash;MemoryRegion *flash_mem;void *flash_ptr; -int ret, flash_size; +uint64_t flash_size; +int ret;assert (PC_MACHINE_GET_CLASS (pcms)->pci_enabled);@@ -204,6 +205,13 @@ static void pc_system_flash_map(PCMachineState *pcms,if (kvm_memcrypt_enabled ()) { flash_ptr =memory_region_get_ram_ptr (flash_mem); flash_size =memory_region_size (flash_mem); + + ret =kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector (flash_ptr, flash_size); +if (ret) { +error_report ("failed to locate and/or save reset vector" ); +exit (1 ); + } + ret =kvm_memcrypt_encrypt_data (flash_ptr, flash_size);if (ret) {error_report ("failed to encrypt pflash rom" );include/sysemu/kvm.h +16
-0@@ -247,6 +247,22 @@ bool kvm_memcrypt_enabled(void);*/ int kvm_memcrypt_encrypt_data (uint8_t *ptr,uint64_t len); +/** +* kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector - sets the CS/IP value for the AP if SEV-ES +* is active. +*/ +void kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector (CPUState *cpu); + +/** +* kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector - locates and saves the reset vector to be +* used as the initial CS/IP value for APs +* if SEV-ES is active. +* +* Return: 1 SEV-ES is active and failed to locate a valid reset vector +* 0 SEV-ES is not active or successfully located and saved the +* reset vector address +*/ +int kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector (void *flash_prt,uint64_t flash_size);#ifdef NEED_CPU_H #include "cpu.h" include/sysemu/sev.h +3
-0@@ -18,4 +18,7 @@void *sev_guest_init (const char *id);int sev_encrypt_data (void *handle,uint8_t *ptr,uint64_t len); +int sev_es_save_reset_vector (void *handle,void *flash_ptr, +uint64_t flash_size,uint32_t *addr); +#endif target/i386/kvm.c +2
-0@@ -1912,6 +1912,8 @@ void kvm_arch_reset_vcpu(X86CPU *cpu) }/* enabled by default */ env->poll_control_msr =1 ; + +kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector (CPU (cpu)); }void kvm_arch_do_init_vcpu (X86CPU *cpu)target/i386/sev.c +6
-0@@ -70,6 +70,19 @@ struct SevGuestState {#define DEFAULT_GUEST_POLICY 0x1/* disable debug */ #define DEFAULT_SEV_DEVICE "/dev/sev" +/* SEV Information Block GUID = 00f771de-1a7e-4fcb-890e-68c77e2fb44e */ +#define SEV_INFO_BLOCK_GUID \ + "\xde\x71\xf7\x00\x7e\x1a\xcb\x4f\x89\x0e\x68\xc7\x7e\x2f\xb4\x4e" + +typedef struct __attribute__((__packed__)) SevInfoBlock { + /* SEV-ES Reset Vector Address */target/i386/sev.c struct SevGuestState { · line 88
Quoted 10 lines
target/i386/sev.c +7
-0+uint32_t reset_addr; + +/* SEV Information Block size and GUID */ +uint16_t size; +char guid[16 ]; +} SevInfoBlock; +static SevGuestState *sev_guest;static Error *sev_mig_blocker;Can we replace "char guid[16]" with "QemuUUID guid"?
Quoted 9 lines
Also, can we replace the
SEV_INFO_BLOCK_GUIDmacro with a static const structure, initialized withUUID_LE()?Something like
static const QemuUUID sev_info_block_guid_le = { .data = UUID_LE(...) };
Can do.
Thanks,
Tom
Quoted 50 lines
Thanks
LaszloQuoted 46 lines
target/i386/sev.c +38
-0@@ -833,6 +846,44 @@ sev_encrypt_data(void *handle, uint8_t *ptr, uint64_t len)return 0 ; } +int +sev_es_save_reset_vector (void *handle,void *flash_ptr,uint64_t flash_size, +uint32_t *addr) +{ +SevInfoBlock *info; + +assert (handle); + +/* +* Initialize the address to zero. An address of zero with a successful +* return code indicates that SEV-ES is not active. +*/ + *addr =0 ; +if (!sev_es_enabled ()) { +return 0 ; + } + +/* +* Extract the AP reset vector for SEV-ES guests by locating the SEV GUID. +* The SEV GUID is located 32 bytes from the end of the flash. Use this +* address to base the SEV information block. +*/ + info = flash_ptr + flash_size -0x20 -sizeof (*info); +if (memcmp (info->guid,SEV_INFO_BLOCK_GUID ,16 )) { +error_report ("SEV information block not found in pflash rom" ); +return 1 ; + } + +if (!info->reset_addr) { +error_report ("SEV-ES reset address is zero" ); +return 1 ; + } + + *addr = info->reset_addr; + +return 0 ; +} +static void sev_register_types (void ) {
Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] sev/i386: Allow AP booting under SEV-ES
In reply to Tom LendackyQuoted 35 lines · * Tom Lendacky ([email protected]) wrote:
From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
When SEV-ES is enabled, it is not possible modify the guests register state after it has been initially created, encrypted and measured.
Normally, an INIT-SIPI-SIPI request is used to boot the AP. However, the hypervisor cannot emulate this because it cannot update the AP register state. For the very first boot by an AP, the reset vector CS segment value and the EIP value must be programmed before the register has been encrypted and measured.
Signed-off-by Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>--- accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ accel/stubs/kvm-stub.c | 5 ++++ hw/i386/pc_sysfw.c | 10 ++++++- include/sysemu/kvm.h | 16 +++++++++++ include/sysemu/sev.h | 3 ++ target/i386/kvm.c | 2 ++ target/i386/sev.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 7 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)accel/kvm/kvm-all.c +1
-0@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@#include "qemu/main-loop.h" #include "trace.h" #include "hw/irq.h" +#include "sysemu/kvm.h" #include "sysemu/sev.h" #include "qapi/visitor.h" #include "qapi/qapi-types-common.h"
accel/kvm/kvm-all.c struct KVMState · line 128
Quoted 8 lines
accel/kvm/kvm-all.c +5
-0@@ -120,6 +121,12 @@ struct KVMState/* memory encryption */ void *memcrypt_handle;int (*memcrypt_encrypt_data)(void *handle,uint8_t *ptr,uint64_t len); +int (*memcrypt_save_reset_vector)(void *handle,void *flash_ptr, +uint64_t flash_size,uint32_t *addr); + +unsigned int reset_cs; +unsigned int reset_ip;
uint32_t's ?
Quoted 182 lines
accel/kvm/kvm-all.c +58
-0+bool reset_valid;/* For "info mtree -f" to tell if an MR is registered in KVM */ int nr_as;@@ -239,6 +246,62 @@ int kvm_memcrypt_encrypt_data(uint8_t *ptr, uint64_t len)return 1 ; } +void kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector (CPUState *cpu) +{ +X86CPU *x86; +CPUX86State *env; + +/* Only update if we have valid reset information */ +if (!kvm_state->reset_valid) { +return ; + } + +/* Do not update the BSP reset state */ +if (cpu->cpu_index ==0 ) { +return ; + } + + x86 =X86_CPU (cpu); + env = &x86->env; + +cpu_x86_load_seg_cache (env,R_CS ,0xf000 , kvm_state->reset_cs,0xffff , +DESC_P_MASK |DESC_S_MASK |DESC_CS_MASK | +DESC_R_MASK |DESC_A_MASK ); + + env->eip = kvm_state->reset_ip; +} + +int kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector (void *flash_ptr,uint64_t flash_size) +{ +CPUState *cpu; +uint32_t addr; +int ret; + +if (kvm_memcrypt_enabled () && + kvm_state->memcrypt_save_reset_vector) { + + addr =0 ; + ret = kvm_state->memcrypt_save_reset_vector (kvm_state->memcrypt_handle, + flash_ptr, flash_size, + &addr); +if (ret) { +return ret; + } + +if (addr) { + kvm_state->reset_cs = addr &0xffff0000 ; + kvm_state->reset_ip = addr &0x0000ffff ; + kvm_state->reset_valid = true; + +CPU_FOREACH (cpu) { +kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector (cpu); + } + } + } + +return 0 ; +} +/* Called with KVMMemoryListener.slots_lock held */ static KVMSlot *kvm_get_free_slot (KVMMemoryListener *kml) {@@ -2193,6 +2256,7 @@ static int kvm_init(MachineState *ms) } kvm_state->memcrypt_encrypt_data = sev_encrypt_data; + kvm_state->memcrypt_save_reset_vector = sev_es_save_reset_vector; } ret =kvm_arch_init (ms, s);accel/stubs/kvm-stub.c +5
-0@@ -114,6 +114,11 @@ int kvm_memcrypt_encrypt_data(uint8_t *ptr, uint64_t len)return 1 ; } +int kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector (void *flash_ptr,uint64_t flash_size) +{ +return -ENOSYS ; +} +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY int kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route (KVMState *s,int vector,PCIDevice *dev) {hw/i386/pc_sysfw.c +9
-1@@ -156,7 +156,8 @@ static void pc_system_flash_map(PCMachineState *pcms,PFlashCFI01 *system_flash;MemoryRegion *flash_mem;void *flash_ptr; -int ret, flash_size; +uint64_t flash_size; +int ret;assert (PC_MACHINE_GET_CLASS (pcms)->pci_enabled);@@ -204,6 +205,13 @@ static void pc_system_flash_map(PCMachineState *pcms,if (kvm_memcrypt_enabled ()) { flash_ptr =memory_region_get_ram_ptr (flash_mem); flash_size =memory_region_size (flash_mem); + + ret =kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector (flash_ptr, flash_size); +if (ret) { +error_report ("failed to locate and/or save reset vector" ); +exit (1 ); + } + ret =kvm_memcrypt_encrypt_data (flash_ptr, flash_size);if (ret) {error_report ("failed to encrypt pflash rom" );include/sysemu/kvm.h +16
-0@@ -247,6 +247,22 @@ bool kvm_memcrypt_enabled(void);*/ int kvm_memcrypt_encrypt_data (uint8_t *ptr,uint64_t len); +/** +* kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector - sets the CS/IP value for the AP if SEV-ES +* is active. +*/ +void kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector (CPUState *cpu); + +/** +* kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector - locates and saves the reset vector to be +* used as the initial CS/IP value for APs +* if SEV-ES is active. +* +* Return: 1 SEV-ES is active and failed to locate a valid reset vector +* 0 SEV-ES is not active or successfully located and saved the +* reset vector address +*/ +int kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector (void *flash_prt,uint64_t flash_size);#ifdef NEED_CPU_H #include "cpu.h" include/sysemu/sev.h +3
-0@@ -18,4 +18,7 @@void *sev_guest_init (const char *id);int sev_encrypt_data (void *handle,uint8_t *ptr,uint64_t len); +int sev_es_save_reset_vector (void *handle,void *flash_ptr, +uint64_t flash_size,uint32_t *addr); +#endif target/i386/kvm.c +2
-0@@ -1912,6 +1912,8 @@ void kvm_arch_reset_vcpu(X86CPU *cpu) }/* enabled by default */ env->poll_control_msr =1 ; + +kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector (CPU (cpu)); }void kvm_arch_do_init_vcpu (X86CPU *cpu)target/i386/sev.c +3
-0@@ -70,6 +70,19 @@ struct SevGuestState {#define DEFAULT_GUEST_POLICY 0x1/* disable debug */ #define DEFAULT_SEV_DEVICE "/dev/sev" +/* SEV Information Block GUID = 00f771de-1a7e-4fcb-890e-68c77e2fb44e */ +#define SEV_INFO_BLOCK_GUID \ + "\xde\x71\xf7\x00\x7e\x1a\xcb\x4f\x89\x0e\x68\xc7\x7e\x2f\xb4\x4e"
target/i386/sev.c struct SevGuestState { · line 85
Quoted 10 lines
target/i386/sev.c +10
-0+ +typedef struct __attribute__((__packed__ ))SevInfoBlock { +/* SEV-ES Reset Vector Address */ +uint32_t reset_addr; + +/* SEV Information Block size and GUID */ +uint16_t size; +char guid[16 ]; +}SevInfoBlock ; +
Is that all signed off and happy from the OVMF guys?
Quoted 18 lines
target/i386/sev.c +11
-0static SevGuestState *sev_guest;static Error *sev_mig_blocker;@@ -833,6 +846,44 @@ sev_encrypt_data(void *handle, uint8_t *ptr, uint64_t len)return 0 ; } +int +sev_es_save_reset_vector (void *handle,void *flash_ptr,uint64_t flash_size, +uint32_t *addr) +{ +SevInfoBlock *info; + +assert (handle); + +/* +* Initialize the address to zero. An address of zero with a successful +* return code indicates that SEV-ES is not active.
target/i386/sev.c sev_encrypt_data(void *handle, uint8_t *ptr, uint64_t len) · line 869
Quoted 10 lines
target/i386/sev.c +10
-0+*/ + *addr =0 ; +if (!sev_es_enabled ()) { +return 0 ; + } + +/* +* Extract the AP reset vector for SEV-ES guests by locating the SEV GUID. +* The SEV GUID is located 32 bytes from the end of the flash. Use this +* address to base the SEV information block.
It surprises me a bit it's at a fixed offset.
Dave
Quoted 23 lines
target/i386/sev.c +17
-0+*/ + info = flash_ptr + flash_size -0x20 -sizeof (*info); +if (memcmp (info->guid,SEV_INFO_BLOCK_GUID ,16 )) { +error_report ("SEV information block not found in pflash rom" ); +return 1 ; + } + +if (!info->reset_addr) { +error_report ("SEV-ES reset address is zero" ); +return 1 ; + } + + *addr = info->reset_addr; + +return 0 ; +} +static void sev_register_types (void ) {Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Signature · 1 line
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / [email protected] / Manchester, UK
Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] sev/i386: Allow AP booting under SEV-ES
Quoted 38 lines · Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Quoted 37 lines · * Tom Lendacky ([email protected]) wrote:
From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
When SEV-ES is enabled, it is not possible modify the guests register state after it has been initially created, encrypted and measured.
Normally, an INIT-SIPI-SIPI request is used to boot the AP. However, the hypervisor cannot emulate this because it cannot update the AP register state. For the very first boot by an AP, the reset vector CS segment value and the EIP value must be programmed before the register has been encrypted and measured.
Signed-off-by Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>--- accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ accel/stubs/kvm-stub.c | 5 ++++ hw/i386/pc_sysfw.c | 10 ++++++- include/sysemu/kvm.h | 16 +++++++++++ include/sysemu/sev.h | 3 ++ target/i386/kvm.c | 2 ++ target/i386/sev.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 7 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)accel/kvm/kvm-all.c +1
-0@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@#include "qemu/main-loop.h" #include "trace.h" #include "hw/irq.h" +#include "sysemu/kvm.h" #include "sysemu/sev.h" #include "qapi/visitor.h" #include "qapi/qapi-types-common.h" @@ -120,6 +121,12 @@ struct KVMState/* memory encryption */ void *memcrypt_handle;
Quoted 8 lines
accel/kvm/kvm-all.c struct KVMState · line 128
Quoted 6 lines
accel/kvm/kvm-all.c +5
-0int (*memcrypt_encrypt_data)(void *handle,uint8_t *ptr,uint64_t len); +int (*memcrypt_save_reset_vector)(void *handle,void *flash_ptr, +uint64_t flash_size,uint32_t *addr); + +unsigned int reset_cs; +unsigned int reset_ip;uint32_t's ?
I can change those.
Quoted 180 lines
Quoted 180 lines
accel/kvm/kvm-all.c +58
-0+bool reset_valid;/* For "info mtree -f" to tell if an MR is registered in KVM */ int nr_as;@@ -239,6 +246,62 @@ int kvm_memcrypt_encrypt_data(uint8_t *ptr, uint64_t len)return 1 ; } +void kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector (CPUState *cpu) +{ +X86CPU *x86; +CPUX86State *env; + +/* Only update if we have valid reset information */ +if (!kvm_state->reset_valid) { +return ; + } + +/* Do not update the BSP reset state */ +if (cpu->cpu_index ==0 ) { +return ; + } + + x86 =X86_CPU (cpu); + env = &x86->env; + +cpu_x86_load_seg_cache (env,R_CS ,0xf000 , kvm_state->reset_cs,0xffff , +DESC_P_MASK |DESC_S_MASK |DESC_CS_MASK | +DESC_R_MASK |DESC_A_MASK ); + + env->eip = kvm_state->reset_ip; +} + +int kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector (void *flash_ptr,uint64_t flash_size) +{ +CPUState *cpu; +uint32_t addr; +int ret; + +if (kvm_memcrypt_enabled () && + kvm_state->memcrypt_save_reset_vector) { + + addr =0 ; + ret = kvm_state->memcrypt_save_reset_vector (kvm_state->memcrypt_handle, + flash_ptr, flash_size, + &addr); +if (ret) { +return ret; + } + +if (addr) { + kvm_state->reset_cs = addr &0xffff0000 ; + kvm_state->reset_ip = addr &0x0000ffff ; + kvm_state->reset_valid = true; + +CPU_FOREACH (cpu) { +kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector (cpu); + } + } + } + +return 0 ; +} +/* Called with KVMMemoryListener.slots_lock held */ static KVMSlot *kvm_get_free_slot (KVMMemoryListener *kml) {@@ -2193,6 +2256,7 @@ static int kvm_init(MachineState *ms) } kvm_state->memcrypt_encrypt_data = sev_encrypt_data; + kvm_state->memcrypt_save_reset_vector = sev_es_save_reset_vector; } ret =kvm_arch_init (ms, s);accel/stubs/kvm-stub.c +5
-0@@ -114,6 +114,11 @@ int kvm_memcrypt_encrypt_data(uint8_t *ptr, uint64_t len)return 1 ; } +int kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector (void *flash_ptr,uint64_t flash_size) +{ +return -ENOSYS ; +} +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY int kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route (KVMState *s,int vector,PCIDevice *dev) {hw/i386/pc_sysfw.c +9
-1@@ -156,7 +156,8 @@ static void pc_system_flash_map(PCMachineState *pcms,PFlashCFI01 *system_flash;MemoryRegion *flash_mem;void *flash_ptr; -int ret, flash_size; +uint64_t flash_size; +int ret;assert (PC_MACHINE_GET_CLASS (pcms)->pci_enabled);@@ -204,6 +205,13 @@ static void pc_system_flash_map(PCMachineState *pcms,if (kvm_memcrypt_enabled ()) { flash_ptr =memory_region_get_ram_ptr (flash_mem); flash_size =memory_region_size (flash_mem); + + ret =kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector (flash_ptr, flash_size); +if (ret) { +error_report ("failed to locate and/or save reset vector" ); +exit (1 ); + } + ret =kvm_memcrypt_encrypt_data (flash_ptr, flash_size);if (ret) {error_report ("failed to encrypt pflash rom" );include/sysemu/kvm.h +16
-0@@ -247,6 +247,22 @@ bool kvm_memcrypt_enabled(void);*/ int kvm_memcrypt_encrypt_data (uint8_t *ptr,uint64_t len); +/** +* kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector - sets the CS/IP value for the AP if SEV-ES +* is active. +*/ +void kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector (CPUState *cpu); + +/** +* kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector - locates and saves the reset vector to be +* used as the initial CS/IP value for APs +* if SEV-ES is active. +* +* Return: 1 SEV-ES is active and failed to locate a valid reset vector +* 0 SEV-ES is not active or successfully located and saved the +* reset vector address +*/ +int kvm_memcrypt_save_reset_vector (void *flash_prt,uint64_t flash_size);#ifdef NEED_CPU_H #include "cpu.h" include/sysemu/sev.h +3
-0@@ -18,4 +18,7 @@void *sev_guest_init (const char *id);int sev_encrypt_data (void *handle,uint8_t *ptr,uint64_t len); +int sev_es_save_reset_vector (void *handle,void *flash_ptr, +uint64_t flash_size,uint32_t *addr); +#endif target/i386/kvm.c +2
-0@@ -1912,6 +1912,8 @@ void kvm_arch_reset_vcpu(X86CPU *cpu) }/* enabled by default */ env->poll_control_msr =1 ; + +kvm_memcrypt_set_reset_vector (CPU (cpu)); }void kvm_arch_do_init_vcpu (X86CPU *cpu)target/i386/sev.c +0
-0@@ -70,6 +70,19 @@ struct SevGuestState {#define DEFAULT_GUEST_POLICY 0x1/* disable debug */ #define DEFAULT_SEV_DEVICE "/dev/sev"
Quoted 15 lines
target/i386/sev.c struct SevGuestState { · line 85
Quoted 13 lines
target/i386/sev.c +13
-0+/* SEV Information Block GUID = 00f771de-1a7e-4fcb-890e-68c77e2fb44e */ +#define SEV_INFO_BLOCK_GUID \ + "\xde\x71\xf7\x00\x7e\x1a\xcb\x4f\x89\x0e\x68\xc7\x7e\x2f\xb4\x4e" + +typedef struct __attribute__((__packed__ ))SevInfoBlock { +/* SEV-ES Reset Vector Address */ +uint32_t reset_addr; + +/* SEV Information Block size and GUID */ +uint16_t size; +char guid[16 ]; +}SevInfoBlock ; +Is that all signed off and happy from the OVMF guys?
Yes, upstream already.
Quoted 23 lines
Quoted 23 lines
target/i386/sev.c +15
-0static SevGuestState *sev_guest;static Error *sev_mig_blocker;@@ -833,6 +846,44 @@ sev_encrypt_data(void *handle, uint8_t *ptr, uint64_t len)return 0 ; } +int +sev_es_save_reset_vector (void *handle,void *flash_ptr,uint64_t flash_size, +uint32_t *addr) +{ +SevInfoBlock *info; + +assert (handle); + +/* +* Initialize the address to zero. An address of zero with a successful +* return code indicates that SEV-ES is not active. +*/ + *addr =0 ; +if (!sev_es_enabled ()) { +return 0 ;
Quoted 8 lines
target/i386/sev.c sev_encrypt_data(void *handle, uint8_t *ptr, uint64_t len) · line 869
Quoted 6 lines
target/i386/sev.c +6
-0+ } + +/* +* Extract the AP reset vector for SEV-ES guests by locating the SEV GUID. +* The SEV GUID is located 32 bytes from the end of the flash. Use this +* address to base the SEV information block. It surprises me a bit it's at a fixed offset.
It's based on the end of flash having fixed offsets for the reset vector code. So going just before those results in a fixed offset for the first GUID entry. After that, more entries can be included and accessed based on the size value of the structure.
Thanks,
Tom
Quoted 26 lines
Dave
Quoted 23 lines
target/i386/sev.c +17
-0+*/ + info = flash_ptr + flash_size -0x20 -sizeof (*info); +if (memcmp (info->guid,SEV_INFO_BLOCK_GUID ,16 )) { +error_report ("SEV information block not found in pflash rom" ); +return 1 ; + } + +if (!info->reset_addr) { +error_report ("SEV-ES reset address is zero" ); +return 1 ; + } + + *addr = info->reset_addr; + +return 0 ; +} +static void sev_register_types (void ) {Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
PATCH v3 4/5 sev/i386: Don't allow a system reset under an SEV-ES guest
In reply to Tom LendackyFrom: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
An SEV-ES guest does not allow register state to be altered once it has been measured. When a SEV-ES guest issues a reboot command, Qemu will reset the vCPU state and resume the guest. This will cause failures under SEV-ES, so prevent that from occurring.
--- accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 9 +++++++++ include/sysemu/cpus.h | 2 ++ include/sysemu/hw_accel.h | 5 +++++ include/sysemu/kvm.h | 2 ++ softmmu/cpus.c | 5 +++++ softmmu/vl.c | 5 ++++- 6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
accel/kvm/kvm-all.c +9 -0
@@ -2388,6 +2388,15 @@ void kvm_flush_coalesced_mmio_buffer(void) s->coalesced_flush_in_progress = false; } +bool kvm_cpu_check_resettable (void ) +{ +/* +* If we have a valid reset vector override, then SEV-ES is active +* and the CPU can't be reset. +*/ +return !kvm_state->reset_valid; +} +static void do_kvm_cpu_synchronize_state (CPUState *cpu,run_on_cpu_data arg) {if (!cpu->vcpu_dirty) {
include/sysemu/cpus.h +2 -0
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ void dump_drift_info(void);void qemu_cpu_kick_self (void );void qemu_timer_notify_cb (void *opaque,QEMUClockType type); +bool cpu_is_resettable (void ); +void cpu_synchronize_all_states (void );void cpu_synchronize_all_post_reset (void );void cpu_synchronize_all_post_init (void );
include/sysemu/hw_accel.h +5 -0
@@ -17,6 +17,11 @@#include "sysemu/hvf.h" #include "sysemu/whpx.h" +static inline bool cpu_check_resettable (void ) +{ +return kvm_enabled () ?kvm_cpu_check_resettable () : true; +} +static inline void cpu_synchronize_state (CPUState *cpu) {if (kvm_enabled ()) {
include/sysemu/kvm.h +2 -0
@@ -494,6 +494,8 @@ int kvm_physical_memory_addr_from_host(KVMState *s, void *ram_addr,#endif /* NEED_CPU_H */ +bool kvm_cpu_check_resettable (void ); +void kvm_cpu_synchronize_state (CPUState *cpu);void kvm_cpu_synchronize_post_reset (CPUState *cpu);void kvm_cpu_synchronize_post_init (CPUState *cpu);
softmmu/cpus.c +5 -0
@@ -927,6 +927,11 @@ void hw_error(const char *fmt, ...)abort (); } +bool cpu_is_resettable (void ) +{ +return cpu_check_resettable (); +} +void cpu_synchronize_all_states (void ) {CPUState *cpu;
softmmu/vl.c +4 -1
@@ -1475,7 +1475,10 @@ void qemu_system_guest_crashloaded(GuestPanicInformation *info)void qemu_system_reset_request (ShutdownCause reason) { -if (no_reboot && reason !=SHUTDOWN_CAUSE_SUBSYSTEM_RESET ) { +if (!cpu_is_resettable ()) { +error_report ("cpus are not resettable, terminating" ); + shutdown_requested = reason; + }else if (no_reboot && reason !=SHUTDOWN_CAUSE_SUBSYSTEM_RESET ) { shutdown_requested = reason; }else { reset_requested = reason;
Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] sev/i386: Don't allow a system reset under an SEV-ES guest
Quoted 22 lines · * Tom Lendacky ([email protected]) wrote:
From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
An SEV-ES guest does not allow register state to be altered once it has been measured. When a SEV-ES guest issues a reboot command, Qemu will reset the vCPU state and resume the guest. This will cause failures under SEV-ES, so prevent that from occurring.
Signed-off-by Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>--- accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 9 +++++++++ include/sysemu/cpus.h | 2 ++ include/sysemu/hw_accel.h | 5 +++++ include/sysemu/kvm.h | 2 ++ softmmu/cpus.c | 5 +++++ softmmu/vl.c | 5 ++++- 6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)accel/kvm/kvm-all.c +0
-0
accel/kvm/kvm-all.c void kvm_flush_coalesced_mmio_buffer(void) · line 2397
Quoted 10 lines
accel/kvm/kvm-all.c +7
-0@@ -2388,6 +2388,15 @@ void kvm_flush_coalesced_mmio_buffer(void) s->coalesced_flush_in_progress = false; } +bool kvm_cpu_check_resettable (void ) +{ +/* +* If we have a valid reset vector override, then SEV-ES is active +* and the CPU can't be reset. +*/ +return !kvm_state->reset_valid;
This seems a bit weird since it's in generic rather than x86 specific code.
Dave
Quoted 82 lines
accel/kvm/kvm-all.c +2
-0+} +static void do_kvm_cpu_synchronize_state (CPUState *cpu,run_on_cpu_data arg) {if (!cpu->vcpu_dirty) {include/sysemu/cpus.h +2
-0@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ void dump_drift_info(void);void qemu_cpu_kick_self (void );void qemu_timer_notify_cb (void *opaque,QEMUClockType type); +bool cpu_is_resettable (void ); +void cpu_synchronize_all_states (void );void cpu_synchronize_all_post_reset (void );void cpu_synchronize_all_post_init (void );include/sysemu/hw_accel.h +5
-0@@ -17,6 +17,11 @@#include "sysemu/hvf.h" #include "sysemu/whpx.h" +static inline bool cpu_check_resettable (void ) +{ +return kvm_enabled () ?kvm_cpu_check_resettable () : true; +} +static inline void cpu_synchronize_state (CPUState *cpu) {if (kvm_enabled ()) {include/sysemu/kvm.h +2
-0@@ -494,6 +494,8 @@ int kvm_physical_memory_addr_from_host(KVMState *s, void *ram_addr,#endif /* NEED_CPU_H */ +bool kvm_cpu_check_resettable (void ); +void kvm_cpu_synchronize_state (CPUState *cpu);void kvm_cpu_synchronize_post_reset (CPUState *cpu);void kvm_cpu_synchronize_post_init (CPUState *cpu);softmmu/cpus.c +5
-0@@ -927,6 +927,11 @@ void hw_error(const char *fmt, ...)abort (); } +bool cpu_is_resettable (void ) +{ +return cpu_check_resettable (); +} +void cpu_synchronize_all_states (void ) {CPUState *cpu;softmmu/vl.c +4
-1@@ -1475,7 +1475,10 @@ void qemu_system_guest_crashloaded(GuestPanicInformation *info)void qemu_system_reset_request (ShutdownCause reason) { -if (no_reboot && reason !=SHUTDOWN_CAUSE_SUBSYSTEM_RESET ) { +if (!cpu_is_resettable ()) { +error_report ("cpus are not resettable, terminating" ); + shutdown_requested = reason; + }else if (no_reboot && reason !=SHUTDOWN_CAUSE_SUBSYSTEM_RESET ) { shutdown_requested = reason; }else { reset_requested = reason;Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Signature · 1 line
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / [email protected] / Manchester, UK
Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] sev/i386: Don't allow a system reset under an SEV-ES guest
Quoted 26 lines · Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Quoted 25 lines · * Tom Lendacky ([email protected]) wrote:
From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
An SEV-ES guest does not allow register state to be altered once it has been measured. When a SEV-ES guest issues a reboot command, Qemu will reset the vCPU state and resume the guest. This will cause failures under SEV-ES, so prevent that from occurring.
Signed-off-by Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>--- accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 9 +++++++++ include/sysemu/cpus.h | 2 ++ include/sysemu/hw_accel.h | 5 +++++ include/sysemu/kvm.h | 2 ++ softmmu/cpus.c | 5 +++++ softmmu/vl.c | 5 ++++- 6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)accel/kvm/kvm-all.c +0
-0@@ -2388,6 +2388,15 @@ void kvm_flush_coalesced_mmio_buffer(void) s->coalesced_flush_in_progress = false; }
Quoted 10 lines
accel/kvm/kvm-all.c void kvm_flush_coalesced_mmio_buffer(void) · line 2397
Quoted 7 lines
accel/kvm/kvm-all.c +7
-0+bool kvm_cpu_check_resettable (void ) +{ +/* +* If we have a valid reset vector override, then SEV-ES is active +* and the CPU can't be reset. +*/ +return !kvm_state->reset_valid;This seems a bit weird since it's in generic rather than x86 specific code.
I could push it down to arch specific code. Is there a way to do that without defining the function for all the other arches?
Thanks,
Tom
Quoted 85 lines
Dave
Quoted 82 lines
accel/kvm/kvm-all.c +2
-0+} +static void do_kvm_cpu_synchronize_state (CPUState *cpu,run_on_cpu_data arg) {if (!cpu->vcpu_dirty) {include/sysemu/cpus.h +2
-0@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ void dump_drift_info(void);void qemu_cpu_kick_self (void );void qemu_timer_notify_cb (void *opaque,QEMUClockType type); +bool cpu_is_resettable (void ); +void cpu_synchronize_all_states (void );void cpu_synchronize_all_post_reset (void );void cpu_synchronize_all_post_init (void );include/sysemu/hw_accel.h +5
-0@@ -17,6 +17,11 @@#include "sysemu/hvf.h" #include "sysemu/whpx.h" +static inline bool cpu_check_resettable (void ) +{ +return kvm_enabled () ?kvm_cpu_check_resettable () : true; +} +static inline void cpu_synchronize_state (CPUState *cpu) {if (kvm_enabled ()) {include/sysemu/kvm.h +2
-0@@ -494,6 +494,8 @@ int kvm_physical_memory_addr_from_host(KVMState *s, void *ram_addr,#endif /* NEED_CPU_H */ +bool kvm_cpu_check_resettable (void ); +void kvm_cpu_synchronize_state (CPUState *cpu);void kvm_cpu_synchronize_post_reset (CPUState *cpu);void kvm_cpu_synchronize_post_init (CPUState *cpu);softmmu/cpus.c +5
-0@@ -927,6 +927,11 @@ void hw_error(const char *fmt, ...)abort (); } +bool cpu_is_resettable (void ) +{ +return cpu_check_resettable (); +} +void cpu_synchronize_all_states (void ) {CPUState *cpu;softmmu/vl.c +4
-1@@ -1475,7 +1475,10 @@ void qemu_system_guest_crashloaded(GuestPanicInformation *info)void qemu_system_reset_request (ShutdownCause reason) { -if (no_reboot && reason !=SHUTDOWN_CAUSE_SUBSYSTEM_RESET ) { +if (!cpu_is_resettable ()) { +error_report ("cpus are not resettable, terminating" ); + shutdown_requested = reason; + }else if (no_reboot && reason !=SHUTDOWN_CAUSE_SUBSYSTEM_RESET ) { shutdown_requested = reason; }else { reset_requested = reason;Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] sev/i386: Don't allow a system reset under an SEV-ES guest
Quoted 37 lines · * Tom Lendacky ([email protected]) wrote:
Quoted 27 lines · Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Quoted 26 lines · * Tom Lendacky ([email protected]) wrote:
From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
An SEV-ES guest does not allow register state to be altered once it has been measured. When a SEV-ES guest issues a reboot command, Qemu will reset the vCPU state and resume the guest. This will cause failures under SEV-ES, so prevent that from occurring.
Signed-off-by Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>--- accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 9 +++++++++ include/sysemu/cpus.h | 2 ++ include/sysemu/hw_accel.h | 5 +++++ include/sysemu/kvm.h | 2 ++ softmmu/cpus.c | 5 +++++ softmmu/vl.c | 5 ++++- 6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)accel/kvm/kvm-all.c +2
-0@@ -2388,6 +2388,15 @@ void kvm_flush_coalesced_mmio_buffer(void) s->coalesced_flush_in_progress = false; } +bool kvm_cpu_check_resettable (void ) +{Quoted 8 lines
accel/kvm/kvm-all.c void kvm_flush_coalesced_mmio_buffer(void) · line 2397
Quoted 5 lines
accel/kvm/kvm-all.c +5
-0+/* +* If we have a valid reset vector override, then SEV-ES is active +* and the CPU can't be reset. +*/ +return !kvm_state->reset_valid;This seems a bit weird since it's in generic rather than x86 specific code.
Quoted 1 line
I could push it down to arch specific code.
It seems best to me.
Quoted 2 lines
Is there a way to do that
without defining the function for all the other arches?
I don't know this interface too well.
Dave
Quoted 84 lines
Thanks,
TomQuoted 79 lines
Dave
Quoted 76 lines
accel/kvm/kvm-all.c +2
-0+} +static void do_kvm_cpu_synchronize_state (CPUState *cpu,run_on_cpu_data arg) {if (!cpu->vcpu_dirty) {include/sysemu/cpus.h +2
-0@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ void dump_drift_info(void);void qemu_cpu_kick_self (void );void qemu_timer_notify_cb (void *opaque,QEMUClockType type); +bool cpu_is_resettable (void ); +void cpu_synchronize_all_states (void );void cpu_synchronize_all_post_reset (void );void cpu_synchronize_all_post_init (void );include/sysemu/hw_accel.h +5
-0@@ -17,6 +17,11 @@#include "sysemu/hvf.h" #include "sysemu/whpx.h" +static inline bool cpu_check_resettable (void ) +{ +return kvm_enabled () ?kvm_cpu_check_resettable () : true; +} +static inline void cpu_synchronize_state (CPUState *cpu) {if (kvm_enabled ()) {include/sysemu/kvm.h +2
-0@@ -494,6 +494,8 @@ int kvm_physical_memory_addr_from_host(KVMState *s, void *ram_addr,#endif /* NEED_CPU_H */ +bool kvm_cpu_check_resettable (void ); +void kvm_cpu_synchronize_state (CPUState *cpu);void kvm_cpu_synchronize_post_reset (CPUState *cpu);void kvm_cpu_synchronize_post_init (CPUState *cpu);softmmu/cpus.c +5
-0@@ -927,6 +927,11 @@ void hw_error(const char *fmt, ...)abort (); } +bool cpu_is_resettable (void ) +{ +return cpu_check_resettable (); +} +void cpu_synchronize_all_states (void ) {CPUState *cpu;softmmu/vl.c +4
-1@@ -1475,7 +1475,10 @@ void qemu_system_guest_crashloaded(GuestPanicInformation *info)void qemu_system_reset_request (ShutdownCause reason) { -if (no_reboot && reason !=SHUTDOWN_CAUSE_SUBSYSTEM_RESET ) { +if (!cpu_is_resettable ()) { +error_report ("cpus are not resettable, terminating" ); + shutdown_requested = reason; + }else if (no_reboot && reason !=SHUTDOWN_CAUSE_SUBSYSTEM_RESET ) { shutdown_requested = reason; }else { reset_requested = reason;Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Signature · 1 line
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / [email protected] / Manchester, UK
PATCH v3 5/5 sev/i386: Enable an SEV-ES guest based on SEV policy
In reply to Tom LendackyFrom: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
Update the sev_es_enabled() function return value to be based on the SEV policy that has been specified. SEV-ES is enabled if SEV is enabled and the SEV-ES policy bit is set in the policy object.
--- target/i386/sev.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
target/i386/sev.c +3 -1
@@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ struct SevGuestState {#define DEFAULT_GUEST_POLICY 0x1/* disable debug */ #define DEFAULT_SEV_DEVICE "/dev/sev" +#define GUEST_POLICY_SEV_ES_BIT (1 << 2) +/* SEV Information Block GUID = 00f771de-1a7e-4fcb-890e-68c77e2fb44e */ #define SEV_INFO_BLOCK_GUID \ "\xde\x71\xf7\x00\x7e\x1a\xcb\x4f\x89\x0e\x68\xc7\x7e\x2f\xb4\x4e"
@@ -375,7 +377,7 @@ sev_enabled(void)bool sev_es_enabled (void ) { -return false; +return sev_enabled () && (sev_guest->policy &GUEST_POLICY_SEV_ES_BIT ); }uint64_t
Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] sev/i386: Enable an SEV-ES guest based on SEV policy
Quoted 16 lines · * Tom Lendacky ([email protected]) wrote:
From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
Update the
sev_es_enabled()function return value to be based on the SEV policy that has been specified. SEV-ES is enabled if SEV is enabled and the SEV-ES policy bit is set in the policy object.Signed-off-by Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>--- target/i386/sev.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)target/i386/sev.c +0
-0
target/i386/sev.c struct SevGuestState { · line 74
Quoted 5 lines
target/i386/sev.c +2
-0@@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ struct SevGuestState {#define DEFAULT_GUEST_POLICY 0x1/* disable debug */ #define DEFAULT_SEV_DEVICE "/dev/sev" +#define GUEST_POLICY_SEV_ES_BIT (1 << 2) +
I'm surprised that all the policy bits aren't defined in a header somewhere.
But other than that,
Quoted 15 lines
target/i386/sev.c +1
-1/* SEV Information Block GUID = 00f771de-1a7e-4fcb-890e-68c77e2fb44e */ #define SEV_INFO_BLOCK_GUID \ "\xde\x71\xf7\x00\x7e\x1a\xcb\x4f\x89\x0e\x68\xc7\x7e\x2f\xb4\x4e"@@ -375,7 +377,7 @@ sev_enabled(void)bool sev_es_enabled (void ) { -return false; +return sev_enabled () && (sev_guest->policy &GUEST_POLICY_SEV_ES_BIT ); }uint64_t Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Signature · 1 line
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / [email protected] / Manchester, UK
Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] sev/i386: Enable an SEV-ES guest based on SEV policy
Quoted 20 lines · Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Quoted 19 lines · * Tom Lendacky ([email protected]) wrote:
From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
Update the
sev_es_enabled()function return value to be based on the SEV policy that has been specified. SEV-ES is enabled if SEV is enabled and the SEV-ES policy bit is set in the policy object.Signed-off-by Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>--- target/i386/sev.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)target/i386/sev.c +0
-0@@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ struct SevGuestState {#define DEFAULT_GUEST_POLICY 0x1/* disable debug */ #define DEFAULT_SEV_DEVICE "/dev/sev"
Quoted 4 lines
target/i386/sev.c struct SevGuestState { · line 74
Quoted 2 lines
target/i386/sev.c +2
-0+#define GUEST_POLICY_SEV_ES_BIT (1 << 2) +I'm surprised that all the policy bits aren't defined in a header somewhere.
I have another version to be issued with changes to use QemuUUID, so I can look at moving the bits to a header.
Thanks,
Tom
Quoted 21 lines
But other than that,
Reviewed-by Dr. David Alan Gilbert <[email protected]>Quoted 15 lines
target/i386/sev.c +1
-1/* SEV Information Block GUID = 00f771de-1a7e-4fcb-890e-68c77e2fb44e */ #define SEV_INFO_BLOCK_GUID \ "\xde\x71\xf7\x00\x7e\x1a\xcb\x4f\x89\x0e\x68\xc7\x7e\x2f\xb4\x4e"@@ -375,7 +377,7 @@ sev_enabled(void)bool sev_es_enabled (void ) { -return false; +return sev_enabled () && (sev_guest->policy &GUEST_POLICY_SEV_ES_BIT ); }uint64_t Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] sev/i386: Enable an SEV-ES guest based on SEV policy
Quoted 25 lines · Tom Lendacky
Quoted 12 lines · Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Quoted 11 lines · * Tom Lendacky ([email protected]) wrote:
From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
Update the
sev_es_enabled()function return value to be based on the SEV policy that has been specified. SEV-ES is enabled if SEV is enabled and the SEV-ES policy bit is set in the policy object.Signed-off-by Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>---
target/i386/sev.c| 4 +++-1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)Quoted 11 lines
target/i386/sev.c struct SevGuestState { · line 73
Quoted 9 lines
target/i386/sev.c +2
-0@@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ struct SevGuestState { #define DEFAULT_GUEST_POLICY 0x1 /* disable debug */ #define DEFAULT_SEV_DEVICE "/dev/sev" +#define GUEST_POLICY_SEV_ES_BIT (1 << 2) +I'm surprised that all the policy bits aren't defined in a header somewhere.
Quoted 1 line
I have another version to be issued with changes to use QemuUUID, so I can look at moving the bits to a header.
Hmmm... and they already are defined in target/i386/sev_i386.h. I guess I was looking for sev.h and didn't notice sev_i386.h. So I'll update to use the values in sev_i386.h.
Thanks,
Tom
Quoted 25 lines
Thanks,
TomQuoted 21 lines
But other than that,
Reviewed-by Dr. David Alan Gilbert <[email protected]>Quoted 15 lines
target/i386/sev.c +0
-0/* SEV Information Block GUID = 00f771de-1a7e-4fcb-890e-68c77e2fb44e */ #define SEV_INFO_BLOCK_GUID \"\xde\x71\xf7\x00\x7e\x1a\xcb\x4f\x89\x0e\x68\xc7\x7e\x2f\xb4\x4e"
target/i386/sev.c +0
-0@@ -375,7 +377,7 @@ sev_enabled(void)bool
sev_es_enabled(void)
{
- return false;
+ returnsev_enabled()&& (sev_guest->policy&GUEST_POLICY_SEV_ES_BIT);
}
uint64_tSignature · 1 line
2.28.0
Quoted 34 lines · * Tom Lendacky ([email protected]) wrote:
From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
This patch series provides support for launching an SEV-ES guest.
Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State (SEV-ES) expands on the SEV support to protect the guest register state from the hypervisor. See "AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Volume 2: System Programming", section "15.35 Encrypted State (SEV-ES)" [1].
In order to allow a hypervisor to perform functions on behalf of a guest, there is architectural support for notifying a guest's operating system when certain types of VMEXITs are about to occur. This allows the guest to selectively share information with the hypervisor to satisfy the requested function. The notification is performed using a new exception, the VMM Communication exception (#VC). The information is shared through the Guest-Hypervisor Communication Block (GHCB) using the VMGEXIT instruction. The GHCB format and the protocol for using it is documented in "SEV-ES Guest-Hypervisor Communication Block Standardization" [2].
The main areas of the Qemu code that are updated to support SEV-ES are around the SEV guest launch process and AP booting in order to support booting multiple vCPUs.
There are no new command line switches required. Instead, the desire for SEV-ES is presented using the SEV policy object. Bit 2 of the SEV policy object indicates that SEV-ES is required.
The SEV launch process is updated in two ways. The first is that a the
KVM_SEV_ES_INITioctl is used to initialize the guest instead of the standardKVM_SEV_INITioctl. The second is that before the SEV launch measurement is calculated, theLAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSASEV API is invoked for each vCPU that Qemu has created. Once theLAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSAAPI has been invoked, no direct changes to the guest register state can be made.
Quoted 11 lines
AP booting poses some interesting challenges. The INIT-SIPI-SIPI sequence is typically used to boot the APs. However, the hypervisor is not allowed to update the guest registers. For the APs, the reset vector must be known in advance. An OVMF method to provide a known reset vector address exists by providing an SEV information block, identified by UUID, near the end of the firmware [3]. OVMF will program the jump to the actual reset vector in this area of memory. Since the memory location is known in advance, an AP can be created with the known reset vector address as its starting CS:IP. The GHCB document [2] talks about how SMP booting under SEV-ES is performed. SEV-ES also requires the use of the in-kernel irqchip support in order to minimize the changes required to Qemu to support AP booting.
Some random thoughts:
a) Is there something that explicitly disallows SMM?
b) I think all the interfaces you're using are already defined in
Linux header files - even if the code to implement them isn't actually upstream in the kernel yet (the launch_update in particular) - we normally wait for the kernel interface to be accepted before taking the QEMU patches, but if the constants are in the headers already I'm not sure what the rule is.
c) What happens if QEMU reads the register values from the state if
the guest is paused - does it just see junk? I'm just wondering if you need to add checks in places it might try to.
Dave
Quoted 48 lines
[1] https://www.amd.com/system/files/TechDocs/24593.pdf
[2] https://developer.amd.com/wp-content/resources/56421.pdf
[3]30937f2f98c4("OvmfPkg: Use the SEV-ES work area for the SEV-ES AP reset vector")https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/commit/30937f2f98c42496f2f143fe8374ae7f7e684847---
These patches are based on commit:
d0ed6a69d3("Update version for v5.1.0 release")(I tried basing on the latest Qemu commit, but I was having build issues that level)
A version of the tree can be found at:
https://github.com/AMDESE/qemu/tree/sev-es-v11Changes since v2:
- Add in-kernel irqchip requirement for SEV-ES guestsChanges since v1:
- Fixed checkpatch.pl errors/warningsTom Lendacky (5):
sev/i386: Add initial support for SEV-ES
sev/i386: Require in-kernel irqchip support for SEV-ES guests sev/i386: Allow AP booting under SEV-ES
sev/i386: Don't allow a system reset under an SEV-ES guest sev/i386: Enable an SEV-ES guest based on SEV policyaccel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ accel/stubs/kvm-stub.c | 5 ++ hw/i386/pc_sysfw.c | 10 +++- include/sysemu/cpus.h | 2 + include/sysemu/hw_accel.h | 5 ++ include/sysemu/kvm.h | 18 +++++++ include/sysemu/sev.h | 3 ++ softmmu/cpus.c | 5 ++ softmmu/vl.c | 5 +- target/i386/cpu.c | 1 + target/i386/kvm.c | 2 + target/i386/sev-stub.c | 5 ++ target/i386/sev.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- target/i386/sev_i386.h | 1 + 14 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Signature · 1 line
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / [email protected] / Manchester, UK
Quoted 47 lines · Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Quoted 34 lines · * Tom Lendacky ([email protected]) wrote:
From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
This patch series provides support for launching an SEV-ES guest.
Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State (SEV-ES) expands on the SEV support to protect the guest register state from the hypervisor. See "AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Volume 2: System Programming", section "15.35 Encrypted State (SEV-ES)" [1].
In order to allow a hypervisor to perform functions on behalf of a guest, there is architectural support for notifying a guest's operating system when certain types of VMEXITs are about to occur. This allows the guest to selectively share information with the hypervisor to satisfy the requested function. The notification is performed using a new exception, the VMM Communication exception (#VC). The information is shared through the Guest-Hypervisor Communication Block (GHCB) using the VMGEXIT instruction. The GHCB format and the protocol for using it is documented in "SEV-ES Guest-Hypervisor Communication Block Standardization" [2].
The main areas of the Qemu code that are updated to support SEV-ES are around the SEV guest launch process and AP booting in order to support booting multiple vCPUs.
There are no new command line switches required. Instead, the desire for SEV-ES is presented using the SEV policy object. Bit 2 of the SEV policy object indicates that SEV-ES is required.
The SEV launch process is updated in two ways. The first is that a the
KVM_SEV_ES_INITioctl is used to initialize the guest instead of the standardKVM_SEV_INITioctl. The second is that before the SEV launch measurement is calculated, theLAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSASEV API is invoked for each vCPU that Qemu has created. Once theLAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSAAPI has been invoked, no direct changes to the guest register state can be made.Quoted 11 lines
AP booting poses some interesting challenges. The INIT-SIPI-SIPI sequence is typically used to boot the APs. However, the hypervisor is not allowed to update the guest registers. For the APs, the reset vector must be known in advance. An OVMF method to provide a known reset vector address exists by providing an SEV information block, identified by UUID, near the end of the firmware [3]. OVMF will program the jump to the actual reset vector in this area of memory. Since the memory location is known in advance, an AP can be created with the known reset vector address as its starting CS:IP. The GHCB document [2] talks about how SMP booting under SEV-ES is performed. SEV-ES also requires the use of the in-kernel irqchip support in order to minimize the changes required to Qemu to support AP booting.
Quoted 2 lines
Some random thoughts:
a) Is there something that explicitly disallows SMM?
There isn't currently. Is there a way to know early on that SMM is enabled? Could I just call x86_machine_is_smm_enabled() to check that?
Quoted 6 lines
b) I think all the interfaces you're using are already defined in
Linux header files - even if the code to implement them isn't actually upstream in the kernel yet (thelaunch_updatein particular) - we normally wait for the kernel interface to be accepted before taking the QEMU patches, but if the constants are in the headers already I'm not sure what the rule is.
Correct, everything was already present from a Linux header perspective.
Quoted 3 lines
c) What happens if QEMU reads the register values from the state if
the guest is paused - does it just see junk? I'm just wondering if you need to add checks in places it might try to.
I thought about what to do about calls to read the registers once the guest state has become encrypted. I think it would take a lot of changes to make Qemu "protected state aware" for what I see as little gain. Qemu is likely to see a lot of zeroes or actual register values from the GHCB protocol for previous VMGEXITs that took place.
Thanks,
Tom
Quoted 51 lines
Dave
Quoted 48 lines
[1] https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.amd.com%2Fsystem%2Ffiles%2FTechDocs%2F24593.pdf&data=02%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7Cb07b788e09054a91143308d85b2f1a89%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637359606292398926&sdata=B2naGIEXuhD7a%2Fi4NDsRzeHwvDvNJ%2FP7nf5HmAzk9CU%3D&reserved=0
[2] https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdeveloper.amd.com%2Fwp-content%2Fresources%2F56421.pdf&data=02%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7Cb07b788e09054a91143308d85b2f1a89%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637359606292398926&sdata=0HrHZxdTEK%2FWM1KxxasMAghpzTNGvuKKSlg6nBgPjJY%3D&reserved=0
[3]30937f2f98c4("OvmfPkg: Use the SEV-ES work area for the SEV-ES AP reset vector")https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ftianocore%2Fedk2%2Fcommit%2F30937f2f98c42496f2f143fe8374ae7f7e684847&data=02%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7Cb07b788e09054a91143308d85b2f1a89%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637359606292408916&sdata=ISAjIahZH4izDHnXgdWDX0GK61kwgtTw%2BEE%2BS8FBls0%3D&reserved=0---
These patches are based on commit:
d0ed6a69d3("Update version for v5.1.0 release")(I tried basing on the latest Qemu commit, but I was having build issues that level)
A version of the tree can be found at:
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FAMDESE%2Fqemu%2Ftree%2Fsev-es-v11&data=02%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7Cb07b788e09054a91143308d85b2f1a89%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637359606292408916&sdata=pWd8HAZkAILIMRb1i5TNz9XoHyrhCgRu%2Bq%2BXN2NJ4ag%3D&reserved=0Changes since v2:
- Add in-kernel irqchip requirement for SEV-ES guestsChanges since v1:
- Fixed checkpatch.pl errors/warningsTom Lendacky (5):
sev/i386: Add initial support for SEV-ES
sev/i386: Require in-kernel irqchip support for SEV-ES guests sev/i386: Allow AP booting under SEV-ES
sev/i386: Don't allow a system reset under an SEV-ES guest sev/i386: Enable an SEV-ES guest based on SEV policyaccel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ accel/stubs/kvm-stub.c | 5 ++ hw/i386/pc_sysfw.c | 10 +++- include/sysemu/cpus.h | 2 + include/sysemu/hw_accel.h | 5 ++ include/sysemu/kvm.h | 18 +++++++ include/sysemu/sev.h | 3 ++ softmmu/cpus.c | 5 ++ softmmu/vl.c | 5 +- target/i386/cpu.c | 1 + target/i386/kvm.c | 2 + target/i386/sev-stub.c | 5 ++ target/i386/sev.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- target/i386/sev_i386.h | 1 + 14 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Quoted 48 lines · Tom Lendacky
Quoted 47 lines · Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Quoted 45 lines · * Tom Lendacky ([email protected]) wrote:
From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
This patch series provides support for launching an SEV-ES guest.
Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State (SEV-ES) expands on the SEV support to protect the guest register state from the hypervisor. See "AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Volume 2: System Programming", section "15.35 Encrypted State (SEV-ES)" [1].
In order to allow a hypervisor to perform functions on behalf of a guest, there is architectural support for notifying a guest's operating system when certain types of VMEXITs are about to occur. This allows the guest to selectively share information with the hypervisor to satisfy the requested function. The notification is performed using a new exception, the VMM Communication exception (#VC). The information is shared through the Guest-Hypervisor Communication Block (GHCB) using the VMGEXIT instruction. The GHCB format and the protocol for using it is documented in "SEV-ES Guest-Hypervisor Communication Block Standardization" [2].
The main areas of the Qemu code that are updated to support SEV-ES are around the SEV guest launch process and AP booting in order to support booting multiple vCPUs.
There are no new command line switches required. Instead, the desire for SEV-ES is presented using the SEV policy object. Bit 2 of the SEV policy object indicates that SEV-ES is required.
The SEV launch process is updated in two ways. The first is that a the
KVM_SEV_ES_INITioctl is used to initialize the guest instead of the standardKVM_SEV_INITioctl. The second is that before the SEV launch measurement is calculated, theLAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSASEV API is invoked for each vCPU that Qemu has created. Once theLAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSAAPI has been invoked, no direct changes to the guest register state can be made.AP booting poses some interesting challenges. The INIT-SIPI-SIPI sequence is typically used to boot the APs. However, the hypervisor is not allowed to update the guest registers. For the APs, the reset vector must be known in advance. An OVMF method to provide a known reset vector address exists by providing an SEV information block, identified by UUID, near the end of the firmware [3]. OVMF will program the jump to the actual reset vector in this area of memory. Since the memory location is known in advance, an AP can be created with the known reset vector address as its starting CS:IP. The GHCB document [2] talks about how SMP booting under SEV-ES is performed. SEV-ES also requires the use of the in-kernel irqchip support in order to minimize the changes required to Qemu to support AP booting.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Some random thoughts:
a) Is there something that explicitly disallows SMM?There isn't currently. Is there a way to know early on that SMM is enabled? Could I just call
x86_machine_is_smm_enabled()to check that?
KVM_CAP_X86_SMM is currently checked as a KVM-wide capability. One option is to change that to use a per-VM ioctl() and then have KVM return 0 for SEV-ES VMs.
target/i386/kvm.c +1 -1
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ int kvm_has_pit_state2(void)bool kvm_has_smm (void ) { -return kvm_check_extension (kvm_state,KVM_CAP_X86_SMM ); +return kvm_vm_check_extension (kvm_state,KVM_CAP_X86_SMM ); }bool kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable (void )
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 6 lines
b) I think all the interfaces you're using are already defined in
Linux header files - even if the code to implement them isn't actually upstream in the kernel yet (thelaunch_updatein particular) - we normally wait for the kernel interface to be accepted before taking the QEMU patches, but if the constants are in the headers already I'm not sure what the rule is.Correct, everything was already present from a Linux header perspective.
Quoted 3 lines
c) What happens if QEMU reads the register values from the state if
the guest is paused - does it just see junk? I'm just wondering if you need to add checks in places it might try to.
Quoted 5 lines
I thought about what to do about calls to read the registers once the guest state has become encrypted. I think it would take a lot of changes to make Qemu "protected state aware" for what I see as little gain. Qemu is likely to see a lot of zeroes or actual register values from the GHCB protocol for previous VMGEXITs that took place.
Yeah, we more or less came to the same conclusion for TDX. It's easy enough to throw an error if QEMU attempts to read protected state, but without other invasive changes, it's too easy to unintentionally kill the VM. MSRs are a bit of a special case, but for REGS, SREGS, and whatever other state is read out, simply letting KVM return zeros/garbage seems like the lesser of all evils.
Quoted 64 lines · Sean Christopherson
Quoted 48 lines · Tom Lendacky
Quoted 47 lines · Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Quoted 45 lines · * Tom Lendacky ([email protected]) wrote:
From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
This patch series provides support for launching an SEV-ES guest.
Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State (SEV-ES) expands on the SEV support to protect the guest register state from the hypervisor. See "AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Volume 2: System Programming", section "15.35 Encrypted State (SEV-ES)" [1].
In order to allow a hypervisor to perform functions on behalf of a guest, there is architectural support for notifying a guest's operating system when certain types of VMEXITs are about to occur. This allows the guest to selectively share information with the hypervisor to satisfy the requested function. The notification is performed using a new exception, the VMM Communication exception (#VC). The information is shared through the Guest-Hypervisor Communication Block (GHCB) using the VMGEXIT instruction. The GHCB format and the protocol for using it is documented in "SEV-ES Guest-Hypervisor Communication Block Standardization" [2].
The main areas of the Qemu code that are updated to support SEV-ES are around the SEV guest launch process and AP booting in order to support booting multiple vCPUs.
There are no new command line switches required. Instead, the desire for SEV-ES is presented using the SEV policy object. Bit 2 of the SEV policy object indicates that SEV-ES is required.
The SEV launch process is updated in two ways. The first is that a the
KVM_SEV_ES_INITioctl is used to initialize the guest instead of the standardKVM_SEV_INITioctl. The second is that before the SEV launch measurement is calculated, theLAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSASEV API is invoked for each vCPU that Qemu has created. Once theLAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSAAPI has been invoked, no direct changes to the guest register state can be made.AP booting poses some interesting challenges. The INIT-SIPI-SIPI sequence is typically used to boot the APs. However, the hypervisor is not allowed to update the guest registers. For the APs, the reset vector must be known in advance. An OVMF method to provide a known reset vector address exists by providing an SEV information block, identified by UUID, near the end of the firmware [3]. OVMF will program the jump to the actual reset vector in this area of memory. Since the memory location is known in advance, an AP can be created with the known reset vector address as its starting CS:IP. The GHCB document [2] talks about how SMP booting under SEV-ES is performed. SEV-ES also requires the use of the in-kernel irqchip support in order to minimize the changes required to Qemu to support AP booting.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Some random thoughts:
a) Is there something that explicitly disallows SMM?There isn't currently. Is there a way to know early on that SMM is enabled? Could I just call
x86_machine_is_smm_enabled()to check that?
KVM_CAP_X86_SMMis currently checked as a KVM-wide capability. One option is to change that to use a per-VMioctl()and then have KVM return 0 for SEV-ES VMs.target/i386/kvm.c +0
-0
target/i386/kvm.c int kvm_has_pit_state2(void) · line 149
Quoted 6 lines
target/i386/kvm.c +1
-1@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ int kvm_has_pit_state2(void)bool kvm_has_smm (void ) { -return kvm_check_extension (kvm_state,KVM_CAP_X86_SMM ); +return kvm_vm_check_extension (kvm_state,KVM_CAP_X86_SMM ); }
This will work. I'll have to modify the has_emulated_msr() op in the kernel as part of the the SEV-ES support to take a struct kvm argument. I'll be sure to include a comment that the struct kvm argument could be NULL, since that op is also used during KVM module initialization and is called before VM initialization (and therefore a struct kvm instance), too.
Thanks,
Tom
Quoted 29 lines
target/i386/kvm.c +0
-0bool kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable (void )Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 6 lines
b) I think all the interfaces you're using are already defined in
Linux header files - even if the code to implement them isn't actually upstream in the kernel yet (thelaunch_updatein particular) - we normally wait for the kernel interface to be accepted before taking the QEMU patches, but if the constants are in the headers already I'm not sure what the rule is.Correct, everything was already present from a Linux header perspective.
Quoted 3 lines
c) What happens if QEMU reads the register values from the state if
the guest is paused - does it just see junk? I'm just wondering if you need to add checks in places it might try to.Quoted 5 lines
I thought about what to do about calls to read the registers once the guest state has become encrypted. I think it would take a lot of changes to make Qemu "protected state aware" for what I see as little gain. Qemu is likely to see a lot of zeroes or actual register values from the GHCB protocol for previous VMGEXITs that took place.
Yeah, we more or less came to the same conclusion for TDX. It's easy enough to throw an error if QEMU attempts to read protected state, but without other invasive changes, it's too easy to unintentionally kill the VM. MSRs are a bit of a special case, but for REGS, SREGS, and whatever other state is read out, simply letting KVM return zeros/garbage seems like the lesser of all evils.
Quoted 67 lines · * Tom Lendacky ([email protected]) wrote:
Quoted 47 lines · Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Quoted 34 lines · * Tom Lendacky ([email protected]) wrote:
From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
This patch series provides support for launching an SEV-ES guest.
Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State (SEV-ES) expands on the SEV support to protect the guest register state from the hypervisor. See "AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Volume 2: System Programming", section "15.35 Encrypted State (SEV-ES)" [1].
In order to allow a hypervisor to perform functions on behalf of a guest, there is architectural support for notifying a guest's operating system when certain types of VMEXITs are about to occur. This allows the guest to selectively share information with the hypervisor to satisfy the requested function. The notification is performed using a new exception, the VMM Communication exception (#VC). The information is shared through the Guest-Hypervisor Communication Block (GHCB) using the VMGEXIT instruction. The GHCB format and the protocol for using it is documented in "SEV-ES Guest-Hypervisor Communication Block Standardization" [2].
The main areas of the Qemu code that are updated to support SEV-ES are around the SEV guest launch process and AP booting in order to support booting multiple vCPUs.
There are no new command line switches required. Instead, the desire for SEV-ES is presented using the SEV policy object. Bit 2 of the SEV policy object indicates that SEV-ES is required.
The SEV launch process is updated in two ways. The first is that a the
KVM_SEV_ES_INITioctl is used to initialize the guest instead of the standardKVM_SEV_INITioctl. The second is that before the SEV launch measurement is calculated, theLAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSASEV API is invoked for each vCPU that Qemu has created. Once theLAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSAAPI has been invoked, no direct changes to the guest register state can be made.Quoted 11 lines
AP booting poses some interesting challenges. The INIT-SIPI-SIPI sequence is typically used to boot the APs. However, the hypervisor is not allowed to update the guest registers. For the APs, the reset vector must be known in advance. An OVMF method to provide a known reset vector address exists by providing an SEV information block, identified by UUID, near the end of the firmware [3]. OVMF will program the jump to the actual reset vector in this area of memory. Since the memory location is known in advance, an AP can be created with the known reset vector address as its starting CS:IP. The GHCB document [2] talks about how SMP booting under SEV-ES is performed. SEV-ES also requires the use of the in-kernel irqchip support in order to minimize the changes required to Qemu to support AP booting.
Quoted 2 lines
Some random thoughts:
a) Is there something that explicitly disallows SMM?There isn't currently. Is there a way to know early on that SMM is enabled? Could I just call
x86_machine_is_smm_enabled()to check that?Quoted 6 lines
b) I think all the interfaces you're using are already defined in
Linux header files - even if the code to implement them isn't actually upstream in the kernel yet (thelaunch_updatein particular) - we normally wait for the kernel interface to be accepted before taking the QEMU patches, but if the constants are in the headers already I'm not sure what the rule is.Correct, everything was already present from a Linux header perspective.
Quoted 3 lines
c) What happens if QEMU reads the register values from the state if
the guest is paused - does it just see junk? I'm just wondering if you need to add checks in places it might try to.
Quoted 5 lines
I thought about what to do about calls to read the registers once the guest state has become encrypted. I think it would take a lot of changes to make Qemu "protected state aware" for what I see as little gain. Qemu is likely to see a lot of zeroes or actual register values from the GHCB protocol for previous VMGEXITs that took place.
Yep, that's fair enough - I was curious if we'll hit anything accidentally still reading it.
How does SEV-ES interact with the 'NODBG' flag of the guest policy - if that's 0, and 'debugging of the guest' is allowed, what can you actually do?
Dave
Quoted 55 lines
Thanks,
TomQuoted 51 lines
Dave
Quoted 48 lines
[1] https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.amd.com%2Fsystem%2Ffiles%2FTechDocs%2F24593.pdf&data=02%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7Cb07b788e09054a91143308d85b2f1a89%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637359606292398926&sdata=B2naGIEXuhD7a%2Fi4NDsRzeHwvDvNJ%2FP7nf5HmAzk9CU%3D&reserved=0
[2] https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdeveloper.amd.com%2Fwp-content%2Fresources%2F56421.pdf&data=02%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7Cb07b788e09054a91143308d85b2f1a89%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637359606292398926&sdata=0HrHZxdTEK%2FWM1KxxasMAghpzTNGvuKKSlg6nBgPjJY%3D&reserved=0
[3]30937f2f98c4("OvmfPkg: Use the SEV-ES work area for the SEV-ES AP reset vector")https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ftianocore%2Fedk2%2Fcommit%2F30937f2f98c42496f2f143fe8374ae7f7e684847&data=02%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7Cb07b788e09054a91143308d85b2f1a89%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637359606292408916&sdata=ISAjIahZH4izDHnXgdWDX0GK61kwgtTw%2BEE%2BS8FBls0%3D&reserved=0---
These patches are based on commit:
d0ed6a69d3("Update version for v5.1.0 release")(I tried basing on the latest Qemu commit, but I was having build issues that level)
A version of the tree can be found at:
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FAMDESE%2Fqemu%2Ftree%2Fsev-es-v11&data=02%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7Cb07b788e09054a91143308d85b2f1a89%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637359606292408916&sdata=pWd8HAZkAILIMRb1i5TNz9XoHyrhCgRu%2Bq%2BXN2NJ4ag%3D&reserved=0Changes since v2:
- Add in-kernel irqchip requirement for SEV-ES guestsChanges since v1:
- Fixed checkpatch.pl errors/warningsTom Lendacky (5):
sev/i386: Add initial support for SEV-ES
sev/i386: Require in-kernel irqchip support for SEV-ES guests sev/i386: Allow AP booting under SEV-ES
sev/i386: Don't allow a system reset under an SEV-ES guest sev/i386: Enable an SEV-ES guest based on SEV policyaccel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ accel/stubs/kvm-stub.c | 5 ++ hw/i386/pc_sysfw.c | 10 +++- include/sysemu/cpus.h | 2 + include/sysemu/hw_accel.h | 5 ++ include/sysemu/kvm.h | 18 +++++++ include/sysemu/sev.h | 3 ++ softmmu/cpus.c | 5 ++ softmmu/vl.c | 5 +- target/i386/cpu.c | 1 + target/i386/kvm.c | 2 + target/i386/sev-stub.c | 5 ++ target/i386/sev.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- target/i386/sev_i386.h | 1 + 14 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Signature · 1 line
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / [email protected] / Manchester, UK
Quoted 74 lines · Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Quoted 67 lines · * Tom Lendacky ([email protected]) wrote:
Quoted 47 lines · Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Quoted 34 lines · * Tom Lendacky ([email protected]) wrote:
From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
This patch series provides support for launching an SEV-ES guest.
Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State (SEV-ES) expands on the SEV support to protect the guest register state from the hypervisor. See "AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Volume 2: System Programming", section "15.35 Encrypted State (SEV-ES)" [1].
In order to allow a hypervisor to perform functions on behalf of a guest, there is architectural support for notifying a guest's operating system when certain types of VMEXITs are about to occur. This allows the guest to selectively share information with the hypervisor to satisfy the requested function. The notification is performed using a new exception, the VMM Communication exception (#VC). The information is shared through the Guest-Hypervisor Communication Block (GHCB) using the VMGEXIT instruction. The GHCB format and the protocol for using it is documented in "SEV-ES Guest-Hypervisor Communication Block Standardization" [2].
The main areas of the Qemu code that are updated to support SEV-ES are around the SEV guest launch process and AP booting in order to support booting multiple vCPUs.
There are no new command line switches required. Instead, the desire for SEV-ES is presented using the SEV policy object. Bit 2 of the SEV policy object indicates that SEV-ES is required.
The SEV launch process is updated in two ways. The first is that a the
KVM_SEV_ES_INITioctl is used to initialize the guest instead of the standardKVM_SEV_INITioctl. The second is that before the SEV launch measurement is calculated, theLAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSASEV API is invoked for each vCPU that Qemu has created. Once theLAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSAAPI has been invoked, no direct changes to the guest register state can be made.Quoted 11 lines
AP booting poses some interesting challenges. The INIT-SIPI-SIPI sequence is typically used to boot the APs. However, the hypervisor is not allowed to update the guest registers. For the APs, the reset vector must be known in advance. An OVMF method to provide a known reset vector address exists by providing an SEV information block, identified by UUID, near the end of the firmware [3]. OVMF will program the jump to the actual reset vector in this area of memory. Since the memory location is known in advance, an AP can be created with the known reset vector address as its starting CS:IP. The GHCB document [2] talks about how SMP booting under SEV-ES is performed. SEV-ES also requires the use of the in-kernel irqchip support in order to minimize the changes required to Qemu to support AP booting.
Quoted 2 lines
Some random thoughts:
a) Is there something that explicitly disallows SMM?There isn't currently. Is there a way to know early on that SMM is enabled? Could I just call
x86_machine_is_smm_enabled()to check that?Quoted 6 lines
b) I think all the interfaces you're using are already defined in
Linux header files - even if the code to implement them isn't actually upstream in the kernel yet (thelaunch_updatein particular) - we normally wait for the kernel interface to be accepted before taking the QEMU patches, but if the constants are in the headers already I'm not sure what the rule is.Correct, everything was already present from a Linux header perspective.
Quoted 3 lines
c) What happens if QEMU reads the register values from the state if
the guest is paused - does it just see junk? I'm just wondering if you need to add checks in places it might try to.Quoted 5 lines
I thought about what to do about calls to read the registers once the guest state has become encrypted. I think it would take a lot of changes to make Qemu "protected state aware" for what I see as little gain. Qemu is likely to see a lot of zeroes or actual register values from the GHCB protocol for previous VMGEXITs that took place.
Quoted 6 lines
Yep, that's fair enough - I was curious if we'll hit anything accidentally still reading it.
How does SEV-ES interact with the 'NODBG' flag of the guest policy - if that's 0, and 'debugging of the guest' is allowed, what can you actually do?
The SEV-ES KVM patches will disallow debugging of the guest, or at least setting breakpoints using the debug registers. Gdb can still break in, but you wont get anything reasonable with register dumps and memory dumps.
The NODBG policy bit enables or disables the DBG_DECRYPT and DBG_ENCRYPT APIs. So if the guest has allowed debugging, memory dumps could be done using those APIs (for encrypted pages). Registers are a different story because you simply can't update from the hypervisor side under SEV-ES.
Under SEV you could do actual debugging if the support was developed and in place.
Thanks,
Tom
Quoted 58 lines
Dave
Quoted 55 lines
Thanks,
TomQuoted 51 lines
Dave
Quoted 48 lines
[1] https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.amd.com%2Fsystem%2Ffiles%2FTechDocs%2F24593.pdf&data=02%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7Cecf88d6f7bd0494d1b0e08d85bb9c19b%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637360201727448609&sdata=e6CbpjDDvCUG2q9pk6OSsty0QB5HuhueVAM4t8iygT8%3D&reserved=0
[2] https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdeveloper.amd.com%2Fwp-content%2Fresources%2F56421.pdf&data=02%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7Cecf88d6f7bd0494d1b0e08d85bb9c19b%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637360201727448609&sdata=%2FUzJB5K%2F8rOMF%2B%2BVPXjg%2BJBLgD4uLW6U82Wvf8pXq%2BA%3D&reserved=0
[3]30937f2f98c4("OvmfPkg: Use the SEV-ES work area for the SEV-ES AP reset vector")https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ftianocore%2Fedk2%2Fcommit%2F30937f2f98c42496f2f143fe8374ae7f7e684847&data=02%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7Cecf88d6f7bd0494d1b0e08d85bb9c19b%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637360201727458605&sdata=0FmiYEdIEtDjw1VIGaeeRrto%2FZpvH1esIgE93gXyagM%3D&reserved=0---
These patches are based on commit:
d0ed6a69d3("Update version for v5.1.0 release")(I tried basing on the latest Qemu commit, but I was having build issues that level)
A version of the tree can be found at:
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FAMDESE%2Fqemu%2Ftree%2Fsev-es-v11&data=02%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7Cecf88d6f7bd0494d1b0e08d85bb9c19b%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637360201727458605&sdata=w1tfrMDgruZBDxNHgKLhpKtQ50Ua%2FMy9IfkSXfne2xg%3D&reserved=0Changes since v2:
- Add in-kernel irqchip requirement for SEV-ES guestsChanges since v1:
- Fixed checkpatch.pl errors/warningsTom Lendacky (5):
sev/i386: Add initial support for SEV-ES
sev/i386: Require in-kernel irqchip support for SEV-ES guests sev/i386: Allow AP booting under SEV-ES
sev/i386: Don't allow a system reset under an SEV-ES guest sev/i386: Enable an SEV-ES guest based on SEV policyaccel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ accel/stubs/kvm-stub.c | 5 ++ hw/i386/pc_sysfw.c | 10 +++- include/sysemu/cpus.h | 2 + include/sysemu/hw_accel.h | 5 ++ include/sysemu/kvm.h | 18 +++++++ include/sysemu/sev.h | 3 ++ softmmu/cpus.c | 5 ++ softmmu/vl.c | 5 +- target/i386/cpu.c | 1 + target/i386/kvm.c | 2 + target/i386/sev-stub.c | 5 ++ target/i386/sev.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- target/i386/sev_i386.h | 1 + 14 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Quoted 86 lines · * Tom Lendacky ([email protected]) wrote:
Quoted 74 lines · Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Quoted 67 lines · * Tom Lendacky ([email protected]) wrote:
Quoted 47 lines · Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Quoted 34 lines · * Tom Lendacky ([email protected]) wrote:
From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
This patch series provides support for launching an SEV-ES guest.
Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State (SEV-ES) expands on the SEV support to protect the guest register state from the hypervisor. See "AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Volume 2: System Programming", section "15.35 Encrypted State (SEV-ES)" [1].
In order to allow a hypervisor to perform functions on behalf of a guest, there is architectural support for notifying a guest's operating system when certain types of VMEXITs are about to occur. This allows the guest to selectively share information with the hypervisor to satisfy the requested function. The notification is performed using a new exception, the VMM Communication exception (#VC). The information is shared through the Guest-Hypervisor Communication Block (GHCB) using the VMGEXIT instruction. The GHCB format and the protocol for using it is documented in "SEV-ES Guest-Hypervisor Communication Block Standardization" [2].
The main areas of the Qemu code that are updated to support SEV-ES are around the SEV guest launch process and AP booting in order to support booting multiple vCPUs.
There are no new command line switches required. Instead, the desire for SEV-ES is presented using the SEV policy object. Bit 2 of the SEV policy object indicates that SEV-ES is required.
The SEV launch process is updated in two ways. The first is that a the
KVM_SEV_ES_INITioctl is used to initialize the guest instead of the standardKVM_SEV_INITioctl. The second is that before the SEV launch measurement is calculated, theLAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSASEV API is invoked for each vCPU that Qemu has created. Once theLAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSAAPI has been invoked, no direct changes to the guest register state can be made.Quoted 11 lines
AP booting poses some interesting challenges. The INIT-SIPI-SIPI sequence is typically used to boot the APs. However, the hypervisor is not allowed to update the guest registers. For the APs, the reset vector must be known in advance. An OVMF method to provide a known reset vector address exists by providing an SEV information block, identified by UUID, near the end of the firmware [3]. OVMF will program the jump to the actual reset vector in this area of memory. Since the memory location is known in advance, an AP can be created with the known reset vector address as its starting CS:IP. The GHCB document [2] talks about how SMP booting under SEV-ES is performed. SEV-ES also requires the use of the in-kernel irqchip support in order to minimize the changes required to Qemu to support AP booting.
Quoted 2 lines
Some random thoughts:
a) Is there something that explicitly disallows SMM?There isn't currently. Is there a way to know early on that SMM is enabled? Could I just call
x86_machine_is_smm_enabled()to check that?Quoted 6 lines
b) I think all the interfaces you're using are already defined in
Linux header files - even if the code to implement them isn't actually upstream in the kernel yet (thelaunch_updatein particular) - we normally wait for the kernel interface to be accepted before taking the QEMU patches, but if the constants are in the headers already I'm not sure what the rule is.Correct, everything was already present from a Linux header perspective.
Quoted 3 lines
c) What happens if QEMU reads the register values from the state if
the guest is paused - does it just see junk? I'm just wondering if you need to add checks in places it might try to.Quoted 5 lines
I thought about what to do about calls to read the registers once the guest state has become encrypted. I think it would take a lot of changes to make Qemu "protected state aware" for what I see as little gain. Qemu is likely to see a lot of zeroes or actual register values from the GHCB protocol for previous VMGEXITs that took place.
Quoted 6 lines
Yep, that's fair enough - I was curious if we'll hit anything accidentally still reading it.
How does SEV-ES interact with the 'NODBG' flag of the guest policy - if that's 0, and 'debugging of the guest' is allowed, what can you actually do?
The SEV-ES KVM patches will disallow debugging of the guest, or at least setting breakpoints using the debug registers. Gdb can still break in, but you wont get anything reasonable with register dumps and memory dumps.
Quoted 7 lines
The NODBG policy bit enables or disables the
DBG_DECRYPTandDBG_ENCRYPTAPIs. So if the guest has allowed debugging, memory dumps could be done using those APIs (for encrypted pages). Registers are a different story because you simply can't update from the hypervisor side under SEV-ES.Under SEV you could do actual debugging if the support was developed and in place.
Thanks for the explanation - it might be interesting to wire the DBG_DECRYPT support up to dump/dump.c for doing full guest memory dumps
- if the policy has it enabled.
Dave
Quoted 62 lines
Thanks,
TomQuoted 58 lines
Dave
Quoted 55 lines
Thanks,
TomQuoted 51 lines
Dave
Quoted 48 lines
[1] https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.amd.com%2Fsystem%2Ffiles%2FTechDocs%2F24593.pdf&data=02%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7Cecf88d6f7bd0494d1b0e08d85bb9c19b%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637360201727448609&sdata=e6CbpjDDvCUG2q9pk6OSsty0QB5HuhueVAM4t8iygT8%3D&reserved=0
[2] https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdeveloper.amd.com%2Fwp-content%2Fresources%2F56421.pdf&data=02%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7Cecf88d6f7bd0494d1b0e08d85bb9c19b%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637360201727448609&sdata=%2FUzJB5K%2F8rOMF%2B%2BVPXjg%2BJBLgD4uLW6U82Wvf8pXq%2BA%3D&reserved=0
[3]30937f2f98c4("OvmfPkg: Use the SEV-ES work area for the SEV-ES AP reset vector")https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ftianocore%2Fedk2%2Fcommit%2F30937f2f98c42496f2f143fe8374ae7f7e684847&data=02%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7Cecf88d6f7bd0494d1b0e08d85bb9c19b%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637360201727458605&sdata=0FmiYEdIEtDjw1VIGaeeRrto%2FZpvH1esIgE93gXyagM%3D&reserved=0---
These patches are based on commit:
d0ed6a69d3("Update version for v5.1.0 release")(I tried basing on the latest Qemu commit, but I was having build issues that level)
A version of the tree can be found at:
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FAMDESE%2Fqemu%2Ftree%2Fsev-es-v11&data=02%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7Cecf88d6f7bd0494d1b0e08d85bb9c19b%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637360201727458605&sdata=w1tfrMDgruZBDxNHgKLhpKtQ50Ua%2FMy9IfkSXfne2xg%3D&reserved=0Changes since v2:
- Add in-kernel irqchip requirement for SEV-ES guestsChanges since v1:
- Fixed checkpatch.pl errors/warningsTom Lendacky (5):
sev/i386: Add initial support for SEV-ES
sev/i386: Require in-kernel irqchip support for SEV-ES guests sev/i386: Allow AP booting under SEV-ES
sev/i386: Don't allow a system reset under an SEV-ES guest sev/i386: Enable an SEV-ES guest based on SEV policyaccel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ accel/stubs/kvm-stub.c | 5 ++ hw/i386/pc_sysfw.c | 10 +++- include/sysemu/cpus.h | 2 + include/sysemu/hw_accel.h | 5 ++ include/sysemu/kvm.h | 18 +++++++ include/sysemu/sev.h | 3 ++ softmmu/cpus.c | 5 ++ softmmu/vl.c | 5 +- target/i386/cpu.c | 1 + target/i386/kvm.c | 2 + target/i386/sev-stub.c | 5 ++ target/i386/sev.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- target/i386/sev_i386.h | 1 + 14 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Signature · 1 line
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / [email protected] / Manchester, UK
Quoted 92 lines · Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Quoted 91 lines · * Tom Lendacky ([email protected]) wrote:
Quoted 74 lines · Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Quoted 67 lines · * Tom Lendacky ([email protected]) wrote:
Quoted 47 lines · Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Quoted 34 lines · * Tom Lendacky ([email protected]) wrote:
From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
This patch series provides support for launching an SEV-ES guest.
Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State (SEV-ES) expands on the SEV support to protect the guest register state from the hypervisor. See "AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Volume 2: System Programming", section "15.35 Encrypted State (SEV-ES)" [1].
In order to allow a hypervisor to perform functions on behalf of a guest, there is architectural support for notifying a guest's operating system when certain types of VMEXITs are about to occur. This allows the guest to selectively share information with the hypervisor to satisfy the requested function. The notification is performed using a new exception, the VMM Communication exception (#VC). The information is shared through the Guest-Hypervisor Communication Block (GHCB) using the VMGEXIT instruction. The GHCB format and the protocol for using it is documented in "SEV-ES Guest-Hypervisor Communication Block Standardization" [2].
The main areas of the Qemu code that are updated to support SEV-ES are around the SEV guest launch process and AP booting in order to support booting multiple vCPUs.
There are no new command line switches required. Instead, the desire for SEV-ES is presented using the SEV policy object. Bit 2 of the SEV policy object indicates that SEV-ES is required.
The SEV launch process is updated in two ways. The first is that a the
KVM_SEV_ES_INITioctl is used to initialize the guest instead of the standardKVM_SEV_INITioctl. The second is that before the SEV launch measurement is calculated, theLAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSASEV API is invoked for each vCPU that Qemu has created. Once theLAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSAAPI has been invoked, no direct changes to the guest register state can be made.Quoted 11 lines
AP booting poses some interesting challenges. The INIT-SIPI-SIPI sequence is typically used to boot the APs. However, the hypervisor is not allowed to update the guest registers. For the APs, the reset vector must be known in advance. An OVMF method to provide a known reset vector address exists by providing an SEV information block, identified by UUID, near the end of the firmware [3]. OVMF will program the jump to the actual reset vector in this area of memory. Since the memory location is known in advance, an AP can be created with the known reset vector address as its starting CS:IP. The GHCB document [2] talks about how SMP booting under SEV-ES is performed. SEV-ES also requires the use of the in-kernel irqchip support in order to minimize the changes required to Qemu to support AP booting.
Quoted 2 lines
Some random thoughts:
a) Is there something that explicitly disallows SMM?There isn't currently. Is there a way to know early on that SMM is enabled? Could I just call
x86_machine_is_smm_enabled()to check that?Quoted 6 lines
b) I think all the interfaces you're using are already defined in
Linux header files - even if the code to implement them isn't actually upstream in the kernel yet (thelaunch_updatein particular) - we normally wait for the kernel interface to be accepted before taking the QEMU patches, but if the constants are in the headers already I'm not sure what the rule is.Correct, everything was already present from a Linux header perspective.
Quoted 3 lines
c) What happens if QEMU reads the register values from the state if
the guest is paused - does it just see junk? I'm just wondering if you need to add checks in places it might try to.Quoted 5 lines
I thought about what to do about calls to read the registers once the guest state has become encrypted. I think it would take a lot of changes to make Qemu "protected state aware" for what I see as little gain. Qemu is likely to see a lot of zeroes or actual register values from the GHCB protocol for previous VMGEXITs that took place.
Quoted 6 lines
Yep, that's fair enough - I was curious if we'll hit anything accidentally still reading it.
How does SEV-ES interact with the 'NODBG' flag of the guest policy - if that's 0, and 'debugging of the guest' is allowed, what can you actually do?
The SEV-ES KVM patches will disallow debugging of the guest, or at least setting breakpoints using the debug registers. Gdb can still break in, but you wont get anything reasonable with register dumps and memory dumps.
The NODBG policy bit enables or disables the
DBG_DECRYPTandDBG_ENCRYPTAPIs. So if the guest has allowed debugging, memory dumps could be done using those APIs (for encrypted pages). Registers are a different story because you simply can't update from the hypervisor side under SEV-ES.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Under SEV you could do actual debugging if the support was developed and in place.
Thanks for the explanation - it might be interesting to wire the
DBG_DECRYPTsupport up todump/dump.cfor doing full guest memory dumps
- if the policy has it enabled.
Someone on our team is looking at hooking in those APIs for displaying / dumping memory. I'll forward this on to them.
Thanks,
Tom
Quoted 65 lines
Dave
Quoted 62 lines
Thanks,
TomQuoted 58 lines
Dave
Quoted 55 lines
Thanks,
TomQuoted 51 lines
Dave
Quoted 48 lines
[1] https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.amd.com%2Fsystem%2Ffiles%2FTechDocs%2F24593.pdf&data=02%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7C8287b3e99fdc41c682fe08d85e244ee0%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637362858215616687&sdata=d9n0rRa2AvVS1dmKyBoCF%2BapDhV6UUc8mfGpWD2%2FxMU%3D&reserved=0
[2] https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdeveloper.amd.com%2Fwp-content%2Fresources%2F56421.pdf&data=02%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7C8287b3e99fdc41c682fe08d85e244ee0%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637362858215616687&sdata=84imjHi1kXbEf2omr1sS%2Brl7gKYeGFGKk%2BeTavyluN4%3D&reserved=0
[3]30937f2f98c4("OvmfPkg: Use the SEV-ES work area for the SEV-ES AP reset vector")https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ftianocore%2Fedk2%2Fcommit%2F30937f2f98c42496f2f143fe8374ae7f7e684847&data=02%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7C8287b3e99fdc41c682fe08d85e244ee0%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637362858215616687&sdata=BTWlq%2BqgpjRtUrbEZE1wasyXxs3YFmfKioEvzvWlsYc%3D&reserved=0---
These patches are based on commit:
d0ed6a69d3("Update version for v5.1.0 release")(I tried basing on the latest Qemu commit, but I was having build issues that level)
A version of the tree can be found at:
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FAMDESE%2Fqemu%2Ftree%2Fsev-es-v11&data=02%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7C8287b3e99fdc41c682fe08d85e244ee0%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637362858215626678&sdata=1o51C3GUrPwodt4yP6ZlkORcrtSfxLUytJtC66OSjSQ%3D&reserved=0Changes since v2:
- Add in-kernel irqchip requirement for SEV-ES guestsChanges since v1:
- Fixed checkpatch.pl errors/warningsTom Lendacky (5):
sev/i386: Add initial support for SEV-ES
sev/i386: Require in-kernel irqchip support for SEV-ES guests sev/i386: Allow AP booting under SEV-ES
sev/i386: Don't allow a system reset under an SEV-ES guest sev/i386: Enable an SEV-ES guest based on SEV policyaccel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ accel/stubs/kvm-stub.c | 5 ++ hw/i386/pc_sysfw.c | 10 +++- include/sysemu/cpus.h | 2 + include/sysemu/hw_accel.h | 5 ++ include/sysemu/kvm.h | 18 +++++++ include/sysemu/sev.h | 3 ++ softmmu/cpus.c | 5 ++ softmmu/vl.c | 5 +- target/i386/cpu.c | 1 + target/i386/kvm.c | 2 + target/i386/sev-stub.c | 5 ++ target/i386/sev.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- target/i386/sev_i386.h | 1 + 14 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)Signature · 1 line
2.28.0