dmaengine: at_hdmac: Fix memory leak
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 dmaengine: at_hdmac: Fix memory leak
This fixes memory leak in at_hdmac. Mainline does not have the same problem.
drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c +3 -1
@@ -1714,8 +1714,10 @@ static struct dma_chan *at_dma_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec, atslave->dma_dev = &dmac_pdev->dev; chan =dma_request_channel (mask, at_dma_filter, atslave); -if (!chan) +if (!chan) { +kfree (atslave);return NULL ; + } atchan =to_at_dma_chan (chan); atchan->per_if = dma_spec->args[0 ] &0xff ;
Signature · 2 lines
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Quoted 9 lines · Pavel Machek
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 10:28:38 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Greg KH <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19] dmaengine:at_hdmac: Fix memory leak
Quoted 4 lines
This fixes memory leak in
at_hdmac. Mainline does not have the same problem.Signed-off-by Pavel Machek (CIP) <[email protected]>
Thanks.
Quoted 21 lines
drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c +3
-1@@ -1714,8 +1714,10 @@ static struct dma_chan *at_dma_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec, atslave->dma_dev = &dmac_pdev->dev; chan =dma_request_channel (mask, at_dma_filter, atslave); -if (!chan) +if (!chan) { +kfree (atslave);return NULL ; + } atchan =to_at_dma_chan (chan); atchan->per_if = dma_spec->args[0 ] &0xff ;Signature · 3 lines
-- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Hi, Pavel,
Quoted 12 lines · Pavel Machek
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
This fixes memory leak in
at_hdmac. Mainline does not have the same problem.Signed-off-by Pavel Machek (CIP) <[email protected]>drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c +0
-0
drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c static struct dma_chan *at_dma_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec, · line 1720
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c +3
-1@@ -1714,8 +1714,10 @@ static struct dma_chan *at_dma_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec, atslave->dma_dev = &dmac_pdev->dev; chan =dma_request_channel (mask, at_dma_filter, atslave); -if (!chan) +if (!chan) { +kfree (atslave);return NULL ; + }
Thanks for submitting this to stable. While the fix is good, you can instead cherry-pick the commit that hit upstream. In order to do that cleanly on top of v4.19.145, you have to pick two other fixes:
commit a6e7f19c9100 ("dmaengine: at_hdmac: Substitute kzalloc with kmalloc") commit 3832b78b3ec2 ("dmaengine: at_hdmac: add missing put_device() call in at_dma_xlate()") commit a6e7f19c9100 ("dmaengine: at_hdmac: Substitute kzalloc with kmalloc")
There are also some locking/deadlock fixes in mainline for this driver, depending on the time you can allocate for this, the list of patches can increase. I should have Cc'ed [email protected] in the first place, my bad.
Also it may worth to read the rules for submitting to stable at:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
Cheers,
ta
Quoted 28 lines · On 9/23/20 11:13 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Hi, Pavel,
Quoted 12 lines · Pavel Machek
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
This fixes memory leak in
at_hdmac. Mainline does not have the same problem.Signed-off-by Pavel Machek (CIP) <[email protected]>drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c +0
-0drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c static struct dma_chan *at_dma_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec, · line 1720
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c +3
-1@@ -1714,8 +1714,10 @@ static struct dma_chan *at_dma_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec, atslave->dma_dev = &dmac_pdev->dev; chan =dma_request_channel (mask, at_dma_filter, atslave); -if (!chan) +if (!chan) { +kfree (atslave);return NULL ; + }Thanks for submitting this to stable. While the fix is good, you can instead cherry-pick the commit that hit upstream. In order to do that cleanly on top of v4.19.145, you have to pick two other fixes:
Quoted 3 lines
commit
a6e7f19c9100("dmaengine:at_hdmac: Substitute kzalloc with kmalloc") commit3832b78b3ec2("dmaengine:at_hdmac: add missingput_device()call inat_dma_xlate()") commita6e7f19c9100("dmaengine:at_hdmac: Substitute kzalloc with kmalloc")
this last commit should have been
commit e097eb7473d9 ("dmaengine: at_hdmac: add missing kfree() call in at_dma_xlate()")
bad copy and paste :)
Quoted 16 lines
There are also some locking/deadlock fixes in mainline for this driver, depending on the time you can allocate for this, the list of patches can increase. I should have Cc'ed [email protected] in the first place, my bad.
Also it may worth to read the rules for submitting to stable at:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.htmlCheers,
ta_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Greg KH
maintainerQuoted 29 lines · On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 08:19:18AM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
Quoted 28 lines · On 9/23/20 11:13 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Hi, Pavel,
Quoted 12 lines · Pavel Machek
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
This fixes memory leak in
at_hdmac. Mainline does not have the same problem.Signed-off-by Pavel Machek (CIP) <[email protected]>drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c +0
-0drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c static struct dma_chan *at_dma_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec, · line 1720
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c +3
-1@@ -1714,8 +1714,10 @@ static struct dma_chan *at_dma_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec, atslave->dma_dev = &dmac_pdev->dev; chan =dma_request_channel (mask, at_dma_filter, atslave); -if (!chan) +if (!chan) { +kfree (atslave);return NULL ; + }Thanks for submitting this to stable. While the fix is good, you can instead cherry-pick the commit that hit upstream. In order to do that cleanly on top of v4.19.145, you have to pick two other fixes:
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
commit
a6e7f19c9100("dmaengine:at_hdmac: Substitute kzalloc with kmalloc") commit3832b78b3ec2("dmaengine:at_hdmac: add missingput_device()call inat_dma_xlate()") commita6e7f19c9100("dmaengine:at_hdmac: Substitute kzalloc with kmalloc")this last commit should have been
commite097eb7473d9("dmaengine:at_hdmac: add missingkfree()call inat_dma_xlate()")bad copy and paste :)
So are all 3 of those needed on both 5.4.y and 4.19.y to resolve this issue?
thanks,
greg k-h
Quoted 35 lines · Greg KH
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
Quoted 32 lines · On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 08:19:18AM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
Quoted 30 lines · On 9/23/20 11:13 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Hi, Pavel,
Quoted 12 lines · Pavel Machek
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
This fixes memory leak in
at_hdmac. Mainline does not have the same problem.Signed-off-by Pavel Machek (CIP) <[email protected]>drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c +0
-0drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c static struct dma_chan *at_dma_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec, · line 1720
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c +3
-1@@ -1714,8 +1714,10 @@ static struct dma_chan *at_dma_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec, atslave->dma_dev = &dmac_pdev->dev; chan =dma_request_channel (mask, at_dma_filter, atslave); -if (!chan) +if (!chan) { +kfree (atslave);return NULL ; + }Thanks for submitting this to stable. While the fix is good, you can instead cherry-pick the commit that hit upstream. In order to do that cleanly on top of v4.19.145, you have to pick two other fixes:
commit
a6e7f19c9100("dmaengine:at_hdmac: Substitute kzalloc with kmalloc")
commit3832b78b3ec2("dmaengine:at_hdmac: add missingput_device()call inat_dma_xlate()")>>> commita6e7f19c9100("dmaengine:at_hdmac: Substitute kzalloc with kmalloc")
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
this last commit should have been
commite097eb7473d9("dmaengine:at_hdmac: add missingkfree()call inat_dma_xlate()")bad copy and paste :)
So are all 3 of those needed on both 5.4.y and 4.19.y to resolve this issue?
Yes. I've just cherry-picked all three commits on both v5.4.86 and v4.19.164, everything looks ok. I also compiled using sama5_defconfig, all good.
The order in which they should be taken is 1/ a6e7f19c9100, then 2/ 3832b78b3ec2, and 3/ e097eb7473d9.
Cheers,
ta
Greg KH
maintainerQuoted 45 lines · On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 08:03:20AM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
Quoted 35 lines · Greg KH
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
Quoted 32 lines · On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 08:19:18AM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
Quoted 30 lines · On 9/23/20 11:13 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Hi, Pavel,
Quoted 12 lines · Pavel Machek
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
This fixes memory leak in
at_hdmac. Mainline does not have the same problem.Signed-off-by Pavel Machek (CIP) <[email protected]>drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c +0
-0drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c static struct dma_chan *at_dma_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec, · line 1720
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c +3
-1@@ -1714,8 +1714,10 @@ static struct dma_chan *at_dma_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec, atslave->dma_dev = &dmac_pdev->dev; chan =dma_request_channel (mask, at_dma_filter, atslave); -if (!chan) +if (!chan) { +kfree (atslave);return NULL ; + }Thanks for submitting this to stable. While the fix is good, you can instead cherry-pick the commit that hit upstream. In order to do that cleanly on top of v4.19.145, you have to pick two other fixes:
commit
a6e7f19c9100("dmaengine:at_hdmac: Substitute kzalloc with kmalloc")
commit3832b78b3ec2("dmaengine:at_hdmac: add missingput_device()call inat_dma_xlate()")>>> commita6e7f19c9100("dmaengine:at_hdmac: Substitute kzalloc with kmalloc")Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
this last commit should have been
commite097eb7473d9("dmaengine:at_hdmac: add missingkfree()call inat_dma_xlate()")bad copy and paste :)
So are all 3 of those needed on both 5.4.y and 4.19.y to resolve this issue?
Quoted 5 lines
Yes. I've just cherry-picked all three commits on both v5.4.86 and v4.19.164, everything looks ok. I also compiled using
sama5_defconfig, all good.The order in which they should be taken is 1/
a6e7f19c9100, then 2/3832b78b3ec2, and 3/e097eb7473d9.
Thanks, will go queue those up now.
greg k-h