Skip to contentSkip to conversation

linux-next: build warnings after merge of the akpm-current tree

DISCUSSION Stephen Rothwell 2 participants 3 messages Oct 6, 2020

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hi all,

After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (sparc defconfig) produced this warning:

mm/memory.c: In function 'copy_present_page':
mm/memory.c:800:20: warning: unused variable 'dst_mm' [-Wunused-variable]

  struct mm_struct *dst_mm = dst_vma->vm_mm;
                    ^~~~~~
mm/memory.c: In function 'copy_present_pte':
mm/memory.c:889:20: warning: unused variable 'dst_mm' [-Wunused-variable]
  struct mm_struct *dst_mm = dst_vma->vm_mm;
                    ^~~~~~

Maybe introduced by commit

7e6cdccef3df ("mm-remove-src-dst-mm-parameter-in-copy_page_range-v2")

Signature · 2 lines
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
#1 lore raw
Quoted 14 lines · Stephen Rothwell

Hi all,

After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (sparc defconfig) produced this warning:

mm/memory.c: In function 'copy_present_page':
mm/memory.c:800:20: warning: unused variable 'dst_mm' [-Wunused-variable]

  struct mm_struct *dst_mm = dst_vma->vm_mm;
                    ^~~~~~
mm/memory.c: In function 'copy_present_pte':
mm/memory.c:889:20: warning: unused variable 'dst_mm' [-Wunused-variable]
  struct mm_struct *dst_mm = dst_vma->vm_mm;
                    ^~~~~~
Quoted 3 lines

Maybe introduced by commit

7e6cdccef3df ("mm-remove-src-dst-mm-parameter-in-copy_page_range-v2")

Yes it is. The mm pointer is only used by set_pte_at(), while I just noticed that some of the archs do not use the mm pointer at all, hence this warning.

The required change attached; this is quite special that we only referenced the mm once in each of the function, so that temp variable can actually be avoided. Ideally there should be some way to only define the variable on archs that need this mm pointer (e.g., when set_pte_at() or some similar function is called multiple times in some function, it should still be helpful to introduce a local variable to keep dst_vma->vm_mm). However I don't know a good way to do this...

Thanks,

------------8<------------

mm/memory.c +2 -5
index 8ade87e8600a..d9b16136014c 100644
@@ -798,7 +798,6 @@ copy_present_page(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma
                  pte_t *dst_pte, pte_t *src_pte, unsigned long addr, int *rss,
                  struct page **prealloc, pte_t pte, struct page *page)
 {
-       struct mm_struct *dst_mm = dst_vma->vm_mm;
        struct mm_struct *src_mm = src_vma->vm_mm;
        struct page *new_page;
 
@@ -874,7 +873,7 @@ copy_present_page(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma
        /* All done, just insert the new page copy in the child */
        pte = mk_pte(new_page, dst_vma->vm_page_prot);
        pte = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(pte), dst_vma);
-       set_pte_at(dst_mm, addr, dst_pte, pte);
+       set_pte_at(dst_vma->vm_mm, addr, dst_pte, pte);
        return 0;
 }
 
@@ -887,7 +886,6 @@ copy_present_pte(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma,
                 pte_t *dst_pte, pte_t *src_pte, unsigned long addr, int *rss,
                 struct page **prealloc)
 {
-       struct mm_struct *dst_mm = dst_vma->vm_mm;
        struct mm_struct *src_mm = src_vma->vm_mm;
        unsigned long vm_flags = src_vma->vm_flags;
        pte_t pte = *src_pte;
@@ -932,7 +930,7 @@ copy_present_pte(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma,
        if (!(vm_flags & VM_UFFD_WP))
                pte = pte_clear_uffd_wp(pte);
 
-       set_pte_at(dst_mm, addr, dst_pte, pte);
+       set_pte_at(dst_vma->vm_mm, addr, dst_pte, pte);
        return 0;
 }
------------8<------------
Signature · 1 line
Peter Xu
#2 lore raw

Hi all,

Quoted 63 lines · On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 16:01:38 -0400 Peter Xu <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 13 lines · Stephen Rothwell

After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (sparc defconfig) produced this warning:

mm/memory.c: In function 'copy_present_page':
mm/memory.c:800:20: warning: unused variable 'dst_mm' [-Wunused-variable]

  struct mm_struct *dst_mm = dst_vma->vm_mm;
                    ^~~~~~
mm/memory.c: In function 'copy_present_pte':
mm/memory.c:889:20: warning: unused variable 'dst_mm' [-Wunused-variable]
  struct mm_struct *dst_mm = dst_vma->vm_mm;
                    ^~~~~~
Quoted 3 lines

Maybe introduced by commit

7e6cdccef3df ("mm-remove-src-dst-mm-parameter-in-copy_page_range-v2")

Yes it is. The mm pointer is only used by set_pte_at(), while I just noticed that some of the archs do not use the mm pointer at all, hence this warning.

The required change attached; this is quite special that we only referenced the mm once in each of the function, so that temp variable can actually be avoided. Ideally there should be some way to only define the variable on archs that need this mm pointer (e.g., when set_pte_at() or some similar function is called multiple times in some function, it should still be helpful to introduce a local variable to keep dst_vma->vm_mm). However I don't know a good way to do this...

Thanks,

------------8<------------

mm/memory.c +1 -3
index 8ade87e8600a..d9b16136014c 100644
@@ -798,7 +798,6 @@ copy_present_page(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma
                  pte_t *dst_pte, pte_t *src_pte, unsigned long addr, int *rss,
                  struct page **prealloc, pte_t pte, struct page *page)
 {
-       struct mm_struct *dst_mm = dst_vma->vm_mm;
        struct mm_struct *src_mm = src_vma->vm_mm;
        struct page *new_page;
 
@@ -874,7 +873,7 @@ copy_present_page(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma
        /* All done, just insert the new page copy in the child */
        pte = mk_pte(new_page, dst_vma->vm_page_prot);
        pte = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(pte), dst_vma);
-       set_pte_at(dst_mm, addr, dst_pte, pte);
+       set_pte_at(dst_vma->vm_mm, addr, dst_pte, pte);
        return 0;
 }
 
@@ -887,7 +886,6 @@ copy_present_pte(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma,
                 pte_t *dst_pte, pte_t *src_pte, unsigned long addr, int *rss,
                 struct page **prealloc)
 {
-       struct mm_struct *dst_mm = dst_vma->vm_mm;
        struct mm_struct *src_mm = src_vma->vm_mm;
        unsigned long vm_flags = src_vma->vm_flags;
        pte_t pte = *src_pte;

mm/memory.c copy_present_pte(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma, · line 935

Quoted 7 lines
mm/memory.c +1 -1
@@ -932,7 +930,7 @@ copy_present_pte(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma,
        if (!(vm_flags & VM_UFFD_WP))
                pte = pte_clear_uffd_wp(pte);
 
-       set_pte_at(dst_mm, addr, dst_pte, pte);
+       set_pte_at(dst_vma->vm_mm, addr, dst_pte, pte);
        return 0;
 }

Thanks, I have applied that to linux-next today.

Signature · 2 lines
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell