sh: Drop ARCH_NR_GPIOS definition
PATCH 1/1 sh: Drop ARCH_NR_GPIOS definition
The default by generic header is the same, hence drop unnecessary definition.
--- arch/sh/include/asm/gpio.h | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
arch/sh/include/asm/gpio.h +0 -1
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@#include <cpu/gpio.h> #endif -#define ARCH_NR_GPIOS 512#include <asm-generic/gpio.h> #ifdef CONFIG_GPIOLIB
Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Quoted 1 line · Andy Shevchenko
The default by generic header is the same, hence drop unnecessary definition.
Any comment on this?
Quoted 20 lines
Signed-off-by Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>--- arch/sh/include/asm/gpio.h | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)arch/sh/include/asm/gpio.h +0
-1@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@#include <cpu/gpio.h> #endif -#define ARCH_NR_GPIOS 512#include <asm-generic/gpio.h> #ifdef CONFIG_GPIOLIB Signature · 1 line
2.28.0
Signature · 2 lines
With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Rob Landley
Acked-byQuoted 4 lines · Andy Shevchenko
Quoted 1 line · Andy Shevchenko
The default by generic header is the same, hence drop unnecessary definition.
Any comment on this?
It's in the stack I forwarded to Rich to look at this weekend.
Rob
Quoted 7 lines · Rob Landley
Quoted 4 lines · Andy Shevchenko
Quoted 1 line · Andy Shevchenko
The default by generic header is the same, hence drop unnecessary definition.
Any comment on this?
Acked-by Rob Landley <[email protected]>
Thanks!
Quoted 1 line
It's in the stack I forwarded to Rich to look at this weekend.
Unfortunately I still do not see this in the latest Linux Next.
Signature · 2 lines
With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
maintainerHi Andy!
Quoted 7 lines · Andy Shevchenko
Quoted 6 lines · Rob Landley
Quoted 4 lines · Andy Shevchenko
Quoted 1 line · Andy Shevchenko
The default by generic header is the same, hence drop unnecessary definition.
Any comment on this?
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line
Acked-by Rob Landley <[email protected]>Thanks!
Quoted 1 line
It's in the stack I forwarded to Rich to look at this weekend.
Unfortunately I still do not see this in the latest Linux Next.
Rich already mentioned that he planned to pick up any patches the next weeks/days.
I'm currently testing all the patches recently posted for any regressions.
Adrian
Signature · 4 lines
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - [email protected] `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - [email protected] `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Quoted 14 lines · John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Andy!
Quoted 11 lines · Andy Shevchenko
Quoted 7 lines · Rob Landley
Quoted 4 lines · Andy Shevchenko
Quoted 1 line · Andy Shevchenko
The default by generic header is the same, hence drop unnecessary definition.
Any comment on this?
Acked-by Rob Landley <[email protected]>Thanks!
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
It's in the stack I forwarded to Rich to look at this weekend.
Unfortunately I still do not see this in the latest Linux Next.
Rich already mentioned that he planned to pick up any patches the next weeks/days.
I'm currently testing all the patches recently posted for any regressions.
I spoke to him on wednesday and he said he was working on it.
Rob
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
maintainerHi Rob!
Quoted 6 lines · Rob Landley
Quoted 4 lines
Rich already mentioned that he planned to pick up any patches the next weeks/days.
I'm currently testing all the patches recently posted for any regressions.
I spoke to him on wednesday and he said he was working on it.
Any news on this? I have tested or acked all patches now that I found on the list that are not applied yet. I can assemble a list of these if necessary.
Adrian
Signature · 4 lines
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - [email protected] `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - [email protected] `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Quoted 6 lines · John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Rob!
Quoted 3 lines · Rob Landley
Quoted 3 lines
Rich already mentioned that he planned to pick up any patches the next weeks/days.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
I'm currently testing all the patches recently posted for any regressions.
I spoke to him on wednesday and he said he was working on it.
Any news on this? I have tested or acked all patches now that I found on the list that are not applied yet. I can assemble a list of these if necessary.
I spoke to him on the 13th and he said he was working on it, just like I spoke to him on the 6th and he said he was working on it. And so on for a few months now.
Assembling a list wouldn't hurt, but I've assembled a list at him multiple times. I suspect what I need to do is assemble a git tree and submit a pull request.
Rob
Hi Andy!
Quoted 13 lines · Andy Shevchenko
The default by generic header is the same, hence drop unnecessary definition.
Signed-off-by Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>--- arch/sh/include/asm/gpio.h | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)arch/sh/include/asm/gpio.h +0
-0
arch/sh/include/asm/gpio.h line 21
Quoted 7 lines
arch/sh/include/asm/gpio.h +0
-1@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@#include <cpu/gpio.h> #endif -#define ARCH_NR_GPIOS 512#include <asm-generic/gpio.h> #ifdef CONFIG_GPIOLIB
Verified on my SH-7785LCR board. Boots fine.
Signature · 4 lines
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - [email protected] `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - [email protected] `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Quoted 12 lines · Andy Shevchenko
The default by generic header is the same, hence drop unnecessary definition.
Signed-off-by Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>--- arch/sh/include/asm/gpio.h | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)arch/sh/include/asm/gpio.h +0
-0
arch/sh/include/asm/gpio.h line 21
Quoted 7 lines
arch/sh/include/asm/gpio.h +0
-1@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@#include <cpu/gpio.h> #endif -#define ARCH_NR_GPIOS 512#include <asm-generic/gpio.h> #ifdef CONFIG_GPIOLIB
Signature · 4 lines
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - [email protected] `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - [email protected] `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913